
Friday, April 23, 2021
Friday, April 23, 2021
Elder of Ziyon
B'Tselem polled Israelis about a number of topics, and it heavily publicizing one result.
The question was:
“A regime in which one group controls, and perpetuates its control over another, through laws, practices and coercive/forced means is considered an apartheid regime. In your opinion, does this description fit or it doesn’t fit Israel?”
25% of Israeli Jews said it fits (8%), or somewhat fits (17%.)
So the headlines are saying "25% of Israeli Jews Acknowledge Israel’s Apartheid."
Only one problem: B'Tselem made up that definition for this poll. You can't find that as a definition of apartheid anywhere.
Dictionary definitions of "apartheid" vary between a specific reference to South Africa's racist system of discrimination against Blacks, or a very general definition of segregating groups. None of them say that treating non-citizens differently from citizens is apartheid - which would be absurd, since every nation on Earth does that.
The Rome Statute defines it as "an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime." It specifies racial groups - not national groups.
Israel's laws that specifically prohibit discrimination against any citizen shows that the "other group" B'Tselem refers to cannot refer to anything religious or racial, but only national.
We have a classic case of a leading question. The people answering didn't have a choice to say "I disagree with your premise." This pressures the people being surveyed to accept the definition as stated, and base their answer on that - and some did. But changing the question even slightly would result in a very different result.
Anyone can make surveys to make people say what they want them to say. Anti-Israel groups do this all the time. And here's a perfect example.

Related Posts:
Another lie by Amnesty International. Why are they respected by anyone?In the Jerusalem Post, Philip Luther, the director of Amnesty International’s Middle Eastern and North African program, responded to NGO Monitor's criticism of the "Gaza Platform." "We are not claiming that the Gaza Platfor… Read More
Saudis create UNESCO template for textbooks worldwideBack in October 2012, Fox News reported: The UN agency that promotes education wants a say in how future textbooks are written, and Saudi Arabia -- a nation whose own school books have been criticized for promoting hatred of… Read More
07/08 Links Pt2: Lumish: American-Left Politically-Correct Chicken-Shit; An Unpopular ManFrom Ian: Michael Lumish: American-Left Politically-Correct Chicken-Shit There is a moral disconnect between western-left opposition to racism, since the end of World War II, and its general disdain for the lone, sole Jewis… Read More
William Schabas lies on HardtalkWilliam Schabas, the original chair of the UNHRC commission designed to malign Israel's conduct in the Gaza war last summer, appeared on BBC's HardTalk to defend himself from accusations of bias and to defend the report… Read More
Amnesty's true colors revealed with fake civilians, even fake children, in their "Gaza Platform" toolYesterday I reported that Amnesty International is releasing today an online application, The Gaza Platform, to do graphical analysis on Israeli attacks in Gaza. And that Amnesty's partners in gathering data were, to b… Read More