Monday, October 21, 2024

  • Monday, October 21, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
Earlier this month, World Beyond War published an article claiming that the death count from the Hamas-run sources was vastly underestimated.

Palestinian Fatalities in Gaza 41,615
Palestinians Missing/Estimated Dead Under the Rubble 10,000
Estimated Deaths from Starvation: 62,413
Estimated Deaths from Lack of Access to Care for Chronic Diseases: 5,000
Estimated Deaths from Infectious Diseases, Maternal/Neonatal Deaths, and Others: ?
We've looked at the bogus "10,000 under rubble" statistic before. But where do they get the 62,413 estimated to have died of starvation?

Following the links, it comes from a "Costs of War" article, which took it from a letter to Joe Biden by Gaza physicians, which included it in an appendix.

Here's what the appendix said:

The fact that Palestinians in Gaza are so hungry that many have died, or that this is the
result of deliberate Israeli policy, is not in dispute. However, the scale of this starvation is
not widely appreciated.

The IPC released reports on Gaza in January, March, and July 2024. Death from starvation of course takes time, and it is not clear how many people in Gaza have died from starvation and its complications or how many will die in the future. Still, according to the IPC technical manual: in the catastrophe phase of food insecurity the crude death rate rises to at least 2 deaths per 10,000 people per day, and in the emergency phase the crude death rate rises to 1-2 deaths per 10,000 people per day. The IPC data is summarized in the table below:

In total it is likely that 62,413 people have died of starvation and its compilations in Gaza from October 7, 2023 to September 30, 2024. Most of these will have been young children.
So they are estimating the number of people starved based on IPC projections which were never true, which were in turn based on faulty data

Hamas, which has every incentive to exaggerate the number of people who starved to death, still claims only 37 deaths from starvation since October 7. That is a far cry from 62,413.

No one seems to be asking where, exactly, these 62,000 people are buried, or how many are children, or where the photos of thousands of starving children with distended stomachs are like we see in real famines, or why Al Jazeera isn't creating lists of thousands of dead, starved children since they have full access to Gaza hospitals.

No, the methodology of these "professionals" is  to find any source claiming high fatalities, no matter how absurd, and make it look official by reproducing it in a respected venue from where it can be in turn republished and laundered as if it came from a more reliable source than the original just making up numbers out of thin air. (Yes, the article also quoted the debunked Lancet letter claiming 186,000  deaths in Gaza inJuly.)

And let me be perfectly clear: The supposed medical professionals who claim the 62,000 number literally just made it up based on a probably purposeful misunderstanding of how the IPC classification system works. 





Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Monday, October 21, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon



An op-ed in Lebanon's L'Orient Today is understandably upset at Israel for bombing their country:

We have every reason to oppose the ongoing Israeli offensive and even more to the prospect of a possible occupation of our territory by a foreign force. Israel is bombing Lebanon, erasing entire villages, and invading its lands, and this cannot in any case — regardless of what one thinks of Hezbollah — be tolerated, let alone approved. 
But, unusually, it then lays partial blame on Lebanon's woes on the Lebanese tolerating Hezbollah taking over their country for Iran.

However, for decades, we have tolerated and even ended up normalizing a totally absurd situation that grants a foreign country the right to decide on war or peace on our territory. Admittedly, we did not have the means to escape an Iranian grip imposed by force, but nothing obligated us to offer it institutional and popular cover. To say that the issue of Hezbollah could not be resolved at the Lebanese level is one thing; to accept this ‘fait accompli’ while waiting for the regional situation to evolve is another. The attacks, coups, and threats of civil war have contributed to making the unacceptable acceptable.

But the fault does not lie only with Iran and Hezbollah, who at least deserve credit for having had a clear project and for having done everything to implement it. It falls on us, the Lebanese people, across all backgrounds, for having succumbed to fear, relativism and especially opportunism. This war may be that ‘of others,’ but we are indeed the primary responsible parties!

The immediate priority is to silence the weapons. We have no leverage over Israel or the United States, and therefore our only chance to achieve this as Lebanese is to convince Hezbollah to accept its defeat. The likelihood that this will work is infinitesimal, but we at least have a duty to try.

Only in a second phase, once a cease-fire is established, will we need to engage in a great dialogue to rethink the Lebanese formula with the aim of laying the foundations for a viable state. A state that protects and unites all communities and that can present itself as a credible alternative to the militia party. Because one of the outcomes of this national dialogue, if it ever takes place, must be the disarmament of Hezbollah and Lebanon's departure from the Iranian sphere of influence.
The Lebanese people have more power than they realize. 

As I have argued for months, Hezbollah is sensitive to Lebanese public opinion, because they claim that they are the "resistance" protecting Lebanon from Israel. Hezbollah's "honor" does not allow them to back down from war because of Israeli airstrikes, but that same honor can be utilized to do what the Lebanese people demand from it. 

Since then, the facade that Hezbollah built that it was defending Lebanon has been torn down, and it is obvious to everyone that Iran is calling the shots. But Hezbollah still maintains the fiction that it is a Lebanese party dedicated to Lebanese interests. That is its entire claim to legitimacy. 

Hezbollah has taken advantage of Lebanese fears of another civil war and used that fear to take over the country. Yet there doesn't have to be another civil war: the Lebanese people simply need to take to the streets to tell Hezbollah to stop shooting at an Israel that they cannot possibly defeat. The people need to show anger at Hezbollah for holding them hostage.

Articles like this are still rare in Lebanese media. Most Arabic media are still pretending that Hezbollah is winning, by highlighting and amplifying stories like how Haifa's shopowners are losing business from rocket warnings. 

The Lebanese have turned timid in the wake of years of internal strife. But the entire world will benefit if they regain their pride and tell Hezbollah that its "resistance" is not wanted and that they do not want to be an Iranian satellite. Hezbollah won't give up, but it could stop the fighting now and give the Lebanese a chance to take back their country.




Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Monday, October 21, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
This photo of a "sukkah" at Columbia University made the rounds yesterday:


People immediately pointed out that the "sukkah" was built under a tree, invalidating it - a sukkah must be under the sky. 

Others noted that there was apparently no "schach" roof covering, but this photo was taken while it was being constructed. They did build a roof - but it wouldn't be valid either since it doesn't cover the required percentage of area.


The students from JVP and other organizations pretended that they were doing this for religious purposes. “With Columbia’s chapter of Jewish Voice for Peace still unjustly suspended by the University, anti-Zionist students struggle to access space for Shabbat services and other religious programming,” they said. Building a non-kosher sukkah sort of proves that this is all a lie.

And they freely admit that they are twisting religion for political purposes. They handed out flyers with a prominent quote from Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel, saying “Prayer is meaningless unless it is subversive, unless it seeks to overthrow and to ruin the pyramids of callousness, hatred, opportunism, falsehoods." However, in that same 1969 essay, Heschel said, 

A great mystery has become a reality in our own days, as God’s response to a people’s prayer. After nearly two thousand years the city of David, the city of Jerusalem, is now restored to the people of Israel. This marvellous event proclaims a call for the renewal of worship, for the revival of prayer. We did not enter the city of Jerusalem on our own in 1967. Streams of endless craving, endless praying, clinging, dreaming, day and night, midnights, years, decades, centuries, millenia, streams of tears, pledging, waiting—from all over the world, from all comers of the earth, carried us of this generation to the Wall, to the city of Jerusalem.
I don't think they will be quoting those words. 

Sukkot is a pilgrimage festival where Jews would travel to the Temple in Jerusalem. You simply cannot separate Sukkot from the Jewish people's deep attachment to Israel.

Similarly, they placed pictures of the seven species on the "sukkah" - seven species of the Land of Israel. 

While it is humorous to see such ignorance and hypocrisy, the haters' blatant attempts to subvert Jewish rituals to attack basic Jewish concepts is thoroughly offensive and disgusting.

But at Northwestern University, they made it even worse.

The university repeatedly warned JVP that the sukkah they planned to build was a violation of policy, since JVP is not a registered student group and the sukkah did not adhere to their display guidelines. They built it anyway. When the university took it down, the hypocrites claimed that the university was antisemitic!




By pretending that this was an antisemitic attack on their beliefs, JVP is attempting to trivialize the actual antisemitism happening on campus for Jewish students who really cannot freely walk around campus without being harassed by these fake Jews and their pro-terrorist partners. 

Their false claims that they are simply wanting to perform Jewish rituals endangers real Jews doing real Jewish rituals. There have been hundreds of instances where synagogues and other Jewish spaces have been protested and targeted  - including violently - throughout the world over the past year. 

By pretending that they are the victims, not the perpetrators, of antisemitism, they are deliberately creating an environment where antisemitism can flourish and where real Jews are afraid. 

Which is the entire point.





Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Monday, October 21, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
Time magazine this week is putting Yahya Sinwar on their cover, with a red X across his face, something they have only done four previous times: Adolf Hitler, Saddam Hussein, Abu Mousab al-Zarqawi and Osama bin Laden.



What do they have in common? 

Palestinian Arabs supported all of them when they were at their most murderous.

For Hitler, I'm not only talking about the infamous Nazi corroborator the Mufti of Jerusalem. Palestinian Arabs helped Nazi parachutists in Palestine and they demanded the British free them when they were captured. And in 1945, for V-E day, the Palestinian Arab regiment joined the march of celebration - but displayed the swastika and a picture of the Mufti, much to the embarrassment of the British.


Saddam? Palestinians loved him, and he loved them back. Palestinians overwhelmingly supported Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, resulting in their being ethnically cleansed from that country. 

Palestinians also supported Bin Laden and Al Qaeda. The earliest poll I can find is 2003, when a far higher percentage of Palestinians - 72% - said they had confidence in Bin Laden than any other Arab group.


 And of course Palestinians have shown great love for Yahya Sinwar. Last December,  Sinwar had an approval rating of 69%, it only went down to 65% in June.


Palestinians consistently support the world's most notorious monsters. 

This isn't exactly what the "right side of history" looks like.




Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

Sunday, October 20, 2024

From Ian:

Supporting Palestinians Has Turned into Normalizing Terrorism
The West opposes violence to achieve political aims. The international community always drew a clear line between advocating for a Palestinian state and supporting Palestinian terrorism.

But Palestinians never rejected terrorism, and therefore, they never achieved a state.

The Palestinian Authority, a governing body created with world support when it pledged to oppose and actively stop terrorism from its people, has instead actively supported and incentivized Palestinian terrorism with its "pay to slay" program of stipends for Palestinian terrorists.

It has yet to condemn the Oct. 7 terror attacks, and many of its leading officials publicly praised them.

While most Palestinian supporters in the West won't directly say they support Palestinian terrorism, they use words that effectively mean the same thing to Palestinian ears.

In demonstrations around the world, Hizbullah and Hamas flags are proudly raised, and chants for the death of Jews and supporting resistance by any means are regularly heard on the streets of Western cities.
Bassam Tawil: The Biden-Harris Administration Owes Israel's Netanyahu An Apology
"Again and again we see that Israel absolutely made the right call in not heeding the Biden administration and the rest of the world's insistence that the IDF not invade Rafah." — Lahav Harkov, Israeli journalist, X, October 17, 2024.

"Pretty rich after a year of undermining Netanyahu, saying he MUST go to a ceasefire, MUST deescalate, trying to stop Israel from going into Rafah WHERE SINWAR WAS KILLED, and Kamala boycotting his joint address to Congress - now Biden & Harris have the nerve to congratulate him for setting the path to peace. I'm sure the phone call sounds something like 'You were right Bibi [Netanyahu], we apologize,'" — US Rep. Mike Waltz, X, October 18, 2024

Israel's killing Sinwar and destroying Hamas's military infrastructure in Rafah sadly show how steadfastly the Biden-Harris administration was trying to prevent Israel from achieving victory over the Iran-backed Islamist murderers and rapists responsible for the deadliest attack against Jews since the Holocaust.

Netanyahu deserves credit for ignoring the warnings and threats by Biden and his senior officials. Thanks to Netanyahu, Hamas has been significantly debilitated and Sinwar has been eliminated, making the Middle East a safer place. It now remains to be seen whether the Biden-Harris administration will reconsider its failed foreign policies and apologize to the Israeli prime minister for attempting to undermine his efforts to combat terrorism and bring more security and stability not only to Israel, but the entire Middle East as well.
Israel Fights Alone, Carrying by Itself a Catatonically Suicidal West
Little Israel is showing the world how to win again – and saving civilization and a free way of life into the bargain .... let Israel keep winning!

The problem with the JCPOA was, of course, its "sunset clauses." They assured Iran that it could legitimately have as many nuclear weapons as it can produce in just a few short years.

The West has left Israel to fight a war that should never have been Israel's alone. The Western nations, through diplomatic miscalculations, the need for votes, cowardice and a fear of conflict, have essentially outsourced their responsibilities for maintaining global peace to Israel, watching from the sidelines as the conflict ramps up.

If the West is too fearful or reluctant to engage directly in the fight against injustice, terror, and tyranny, the very least it can do is stand with Israel and stop trying to sabotage it at every turn. Support should not be limited to words but include political, diplomatic and military backing. By failing to support Israel fully, the West is empowering exactly those countries working to revise the world order -- from one of freedom to one of tyranny -- by displacing the West.

It is a grotesque reflection on the international community, particularly the Biden-Harris administration and the European Union, not to be offering unequivocal support. Israel's struggle is not just for its own survival but for the security and peace of the Free World. The West, through its passivity, is failing not only Israel, it is hollowing out its own survival.
  • Sunday, October 20, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
Here is a poster issued by Islamic Jihad's Palestine Today news outlet  on October 6 celebrating their count of terror attacks from the West Bank over the year.



Translation:

Since October 7, 2023, there have been 2,932  qualitative resistance operations in the West Bank that killed 50 "Israelis" and injured 377 others.

1797 Shooting operations

856 Explosive devices

23 car ramming operations

40 stabbing operations
I don't think these numbers are accurate (I count about 23 killed from West Bank attacks) but the very existence of this poster shows the depravity of the terrorists that the world wants to legitimize. They literally cheer murdering Jewish civilians and every elderly man or child they kill is something they brag about.

If there is any justification for continuing a war to destroy them, it is their own actions and words.



Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Sunday, October 20, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
There are lots of "experts" who are substituting wishful thinking for decent analysis in the wake of Yahya Sinwar's death. Let's look at what Hamas is likely to do, and what will happen next,  a bit more dispassionately.

Right now, Hamas is suffering a leadership vacuum. Even before Israel killed Hamas' "political leader" Ismail Haniyeh, Sinwar was really the real leader of Hamas, since he was the one on the ground in Gaza and only his decisions mattered. No matter what Hamas in Qatar or elsewhere decided, Sinwar was the one who held all the cards. He decided what the military strategy would be, what the negotiating strategy would be and what would happen to the hostages.

The idea that Hamas will simply replace Sinwar and everything will be the way it was, the way they have done in the past when Israel assassinated Hamas leaders, is fantasy fueled by Hamas propaganda. Israel has already killed most of the major figures in Gaza so there are very few who can step into his bloody shoes. 

Again, anyone outside Gaza is irrelevant.

This means that either Sinwar will be replaced by a unifying figure in Gaza or by some sort of committee. 

The vacuum created by Hassan Nasrallah's assassination in Hezbollah has seemingly been filled by Iranian officials, but this does not seem as likely for Hamas. Iran will need to approve any replacement but it cannot provide one.

Either way, the honor/shame mentality that the "experts" consistently ignore or downplay is, as always, the most important factor in what Hamas will do next.

The most likely single candidate appears to be Sinwar's younger brother Mohammed, who is equally ruthless. Whether he has the same leadership skills is an open question but he appears to be competent and just as much of a hardliner. He is not likely to want to show more flexibility in negotiations than his dead older brother did.

If a committee takes over, that also does not mean any realistic chance for leadership that would be pragmatic. The most extreme member of the committee would likely be the veto vote over any potential deal, and no one wants to be known as the person who knuckled under to Israel. 

In either scenario, Hamas is not likely to surrender, or to negotiate seriously for the hostages, unless they have a guarantee of survival as Gaza's leaders, and Israel will never accept that.

As it is today, Hamas is no longer an army. It is back to being mostly a guerilla group. As such, it is not going to be destroyed anytime soon. But as long as Gazans are still afraid of Hamas, Hamas has effective control of Gaza even in skeleton form. 

In short, Hamas has to be defeated in a way that no one can deny.  Which means it needs to be not just defeated, but replaced.

That is the real problem.

For Hamas to be defeated in the minds of Gazans,  someone has to fill the gap of day to day governance - and no one really wants to do that. 

The PA would love to take over Gaza but it needs Hamas to be completely destroyed first. It will do everything to avoid fighting Hamas' guerilla remnants because it is afraid of appearing to be doing what Israel wants.  

A multinational force, preferably led by Arab countries at peace with Israel, is a possibility but that is remote as well. 

I always felt that letting the UAE take over Gaza would be the best solution, and I still do, but no matter the benefits to making Gaza an emirate, they don't want to be put in that position.

As long as that question is not settled, Hamas remains the de facto government of Gaza, no matter how dysfunctional and weak it is. NGOs can take up a small amount of the government functions like delivering aid but any real replacement has to be willing to fight Hamas for that title, and no one is willing to do that.

It appears to me that the main factors for Hamas maintaining its grip on power are whether Hamas leaders still have effective communications with their operatives in the field,  whether the rank and file of Hamas are still dedicated to risk their lives for  the organization, and whether they can still assert an iron fist rule over the people of Gaza while still fighting Israel.  If any of those three are broken, Hamas is no longer nearly as much of a threat and can perhaps be replaced with an entity that is willing to tke over. But, again, someone has to be willing to step in.

Contrary to what the US and the West claim, Israel has little control over how Gaza will look in a post-Hamas world unless Israel wants to directly re-occupy Gaza and take over the governmental and security functions itself. That is not something anyone wants to see. The IDF itself would have to dedicate many tens of thousands of people indefinitely for a project like that, and most Israelis don't want that. This may be the least of all evils but no one is likely to support it. 

So the obstacle for peace is not Israel but that no one wants to seriously challenge Hamas for ruling Gaza. They still fear Hamas. Israel can deal with any leadership that is not dedicated to destroying Israel - but who could that be? 

Until those questions are answered, Israel needs to prioritize the cognitive war to make sure that the Arab world sees Hamas is defeated and impotent. Of course, it has to simultaneously continue to degrade Hamas' political and military abilities. If possible, Hamas should look like a joke to the Arab world. Because the weaker it looks, more more likely a substitute can be found. 

Without a substitute, peace is simply not possible and Gazans are the ones who will suffer the most. 





Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Sunday, October 20, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon


The Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization issued a statement which said, in part:
The Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization mourns to the sons of our Palestinian people and all national action factions the martyrdom of the great national leader Yahya Sinwar, head of the political bureau of Hamas .

The Executive Committee extends its deepest condolences to the brothers in the Hamas leadership and cadres and to the family of the martyr Yahya Sinwar, calling for moving forward to strengthen our national unity within the framework of our sole legitimate representative, the Palestine Liberation Organization, so that we may be one front to thwart the Israeli plan aimed at displacing our people from their homeland, whether in the Gaza Strip or the West Bank...
The Executive Committee has 16 members. Its chairman is none other than Mahmoud Abbas.

The statement pretends that Sinwar, the architect of October 7 massacre, was merely the head of the "political bureau" of Hamas. 

The official Palestinian Wafa news agency published this statement - but only in its Arabic site, not its English site. 

The PLO website also published the statement of the minor Arab Liberation Front, which has not done anything of note for decades and does not even have a current webpage, to add to its mourning for Sinwar. The only possible reason to publish this statement from the ALF is if the PLO agrees with it.

With great sadness and pain, the Arab Liberation Front mourns the great national martyr Yahya Sinwar, head of the Political Bureau of the Islamic Resistance Movement Hamas, who ascended to glory as a martyr following an armed clash with the Zionist occupation soldiers in the Tel al-Sultan neighborhood in the city of Rafah on the afternoon of Thursday, October 17, 2024. The Front, led by its Secretary-General Rakad Salem Abu Mahmoud, offered its condolences and sympathy to the brothers in the Political Bureau of the Islamic Resistance Movement Hamas, to the family of the martyr, and to all the sons of our steadfast people.

The Arab Liberation Front confirmed that the martyrdom of the leader Yahya Sinwar and before him the martyr leaders Yasser Arafat, Abu Ali Mustafa, Ahmed Yassin, Khalil Al-Wazir and other martyred leaders of the revolution will only increase the strength and steadfastness of our people in confronting this arrogant Zionist enemy.
The PLO, and Abbas, support Hamas. They might disagree with Hamas as to who should control the Palestinians politically but they far prefer Hamas to peace. 

The proof is in every Fatah, PLO and Palestinian Authority statement. And every time a Western leader says "two state solution." they are insisting that this Hamas-supporting Palestinian leadership control a Palestinian state that Israel is supposed to welcome - for its own security.







Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

Saturday, October 19, 2024

From Ian:

Brendan O'Neill: Death of a fascist
This is a man who deserved to die. His crimes against the Jews were legion. He took the postwar cry of ‘Never Again’ and stomped it into the dirt. ‘Again, again’ was his preferred slogan. His violent disregard for Jewish life was a function of his deep-seated anti-Semitism – you don’t get to be leader of a terror group whose founding covenant committed it to an apocalyptic war on the Jews without being a Jew-hater yourself. Yet he was horrendously cavalier about Palestinian life, too. He let Hamas’s war with Israel drag on because he believed the ‘spiralling civilian death toll in Gaza’ would drum up global hate for Israel and global pity for Hamas. He sacrificed Jews to his racist ideology, and Palestinians to his grotesque vanity.

So Gazans also benefit from the demise of this monster. They are a step closer to liberation from the tyrannical rule of the death-mongers of Hamas. Humankind benefits, too. For Israel’s righteous slaying of Yahya Sinwar is more than justice for 7 October. It is more than a brilliant and targeted strike in a now year-long war on terrorism. It is also a message to the world. It says this: you cannot kill Jews with impunity anymore. It reminds us that those days are gone. It reminds us it isn’t the Middle Ages anymore, when the Church would reward your Jew-hunting, or the 20th century, when pogroms had the blessing of governments. No, there are consequences now to singling out Jews for special opprobrium and wicked violence. Do that today and you might very well die. Do that now and you might get your head caved in, as Sinwar did.

And here’s the chilling thing, the thing that should truly unsettle those of us who live in the West: we needed this message. Our nations needed this reminder. Our young in particular needed to be told that fascist violence is intolerable and killing Jews will be rightfully avenged. For across America and Europe in the aftermath of 7 October, unreason reigned. On our campuses, our streets, in our art world and media world, the sympathies of the privileged went not to the victims of Hamas’s pogrom, but to Hamas. Israel was offered not support but condemnation – and the most shrill, hypocritical and borderline bigoted condemnation you could imagine. ‘You had it coming’ was the subtext of the Israelophobic insanity that swept our cities after the pogrom.

We found ourselves in the horrific situation where many of our fellow citizens were seemingly content to see Jews once again loaded into trucks, burnt to a cinder and killed on account of their ethnicity. This spoke to more than a failure of sense and solidarity. It spoke to how determinedly our societies had turned their backs on the values of the Enlightenment and the virtues of civilisation, and could thus find greater common cause with the anti-Jewish, anti-modernity hysterics of Hamas than with the democratic state of Israel.

So yes, we needed to hear it. We needed to hear that the murder of Jews will be met with the severest of consequences in the 21st century. The killing of Sinwar puts flesh on the bones of the cry of ‘Never Again’ that had come to be so weakened and withered in recent years. Jew-killers everywhere will tremble now, making this not a day of death, but a day of hope.
JPost Editorial: With Sinwar gone, Israel's next move must be decisive
Hamas and Hezbollah have both suffered heavy losses over the last year, but Israel did what many thought was impossible and took down those responsible for October 7. At long last, all the ringleaders are down and out – for good.

Decisions will need to be made about what to do next, and this war is still not over. Hezbollah remains a well-armed threat against Israel and continues to regularly fire rockets, drones, and missiles into the Jewish state. Hamas still has men under arms and rockets at their disposal, and 101 hostages still remain in their possession. The Houthis in Yemen are still a threat that could strike at any moment, boasting an arsenal of ballistic missiles and drones, and their leadership remains intact. And then there is the ever-looming threat of Iran, a well-equipped nation who backs all the aforementioned actors and hosts a formidably large army of its own.

What's next?


So what comes next? Will Israel be able to start returning evacuees to their homes? Will they press for another hostage deal on favorable terms? Will the IDF turn its focus to Iran or the Houthis?

Those questions will need to be answered very soon, and it remains to be seen how Israel’s allies such as the US will want the Jewish state to proceed. But for now, we can take solace in the fact that at the very least, Israel’s archenemy over the past year is dead, and that some measure of justice has been achieved for all the people who have lost and suffered since October 7. Zman simchateinu indeed.
Abe Greenwald: Sinwar Is Gone, Hamas Isn’t Far Behind
All of this also means that Hamas’s remnants might find themselves without the Iranian funds they’d have used to try to reconstitute the organization in the future. The regime in Iran has spent billions of dollars on its terrorist proxies. This was a good investment for decades, enabling Tehran to project power abroad and attack Israel without Iran sticking its neck out. But the mullahs can’t be happy looking at the present state of Hamas (and increasingly of Hezbollah). Iran’s return on its investment in proxy armies is vanishing fast. And with Israel about to take the fight straight to the regime, Iran needs to reallocate its resources.

So who wants to fill Sinwar’s shoes now? Israel took out Hamas leader Ismael Haniyeh in July. The crown then fell to Sinwar, and now he’s dead. The list of senior Hamas members killed by Israel is long and growing longer by the day. The same, rather suddenly, applies to the senior ranks of Hezbollah. There aren’t many takers for the job of next mole to be whacked. Especially if it means getting whacked for a crumbling cause with a spare and ruined fighting force. It’s not going to be easy recruiting new members to what’s left of Hamas.

But what about Hamas’s supporters over here in the U.S.? Are they still “exhilarated” by the October 7 attack? Do they still think that it was a “gift to Allah from the world”? That “Palestine has never been as within reach”? Are they satisfied with what Hamas has wrought for the people of Gaza? And do they still think they’re on the winning side against Israel? Even if they now recognize Hamas’s strategic failure, they undoubtedly still support its aims. And they’re the kind of enemy that’s truly hard to defeat because you can’t destroy moral imbecility. On October 7, 2023, Sinwar ensured his own demise and that of his monstrous organization. But the woke jihadists of the West will live to tweet another day.

And here’s a thought for the Biden administration. The U.S. has recently threatened to withhold arms shipments to Israel over concerns about humanitarian aid getting into Gaza. The greatest gift of humanitarian aid ever received by the people of Gaza was Israel’s killing of Yahya Sinwar. His death, and the destruction of Hamas, don’t by any means guarantee that the Palestinians will one day be able to thrive in freedom. But so long as he was in charge, that would have remained a certain impossibility. And if Israel had heeded the Biden administration’s calls for a ceasefire, this massive aid package would never have been delivered. Take the win, Mr. President.

Wednesday, October 16, 2024

From Ian:

Andrew Roberts: Churchill would have stood behind Israel. We must too
Although the USSR and USA were not fighting the Second World War beside Britain in 1940, and only came into the war as a result of Hitler’s decisions rather than their own in 1941, the British were supported stalwartly by Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, India and other possessions and dependencies around the globe.

By total contrast, much of the world has shunned Israel as she fights its battles against Islamist tyranny and terrorism, ultimately for them as well as for herself.

The recent scene in the United Nations where delegates filed out of the General Assembly room rather than even listen to Bibi Netanyahu sums up the situation.

Meanwhile, South Africa has tried to divert attention from the corruption of its own government by making unfounded charges against Israel at the International Criminal Court.

At least the neutral nations in 1940-41 were privately hoping that civilisation would destroy barbarism: today they cannot even be counted on to do that.

What Churchill said about Britain’s ability “to ride out the storm of war” has powerful echoes in modern-day Israel.

The performance of the IDF was woeful on October 7 itself but since then it has fought with superb professionalism in destroying and degrading Hamas in Gaza, although of course we still eagerly await the moment when Yahya Sinwar meets the same fate as the Führer in the Reich Chancellery on April 30, 1945. Similarly, the failures of the hitherto-much-vaunted Israeli intelligence were apparent for all to see on October 7, yet since then it has carried out the flawless supply-chain “grim beeper” attacks that have done so much to cripple Hezbollah. Churchill would recognise the phenomenon of these early humiliations – with hardly a significant victory from 1939 to El Alamein in 1942, except for the Battle of Britain – turning into later triumphs. The IDF’s steep but highly successful learning curve in Gaza and now southern Lebanon has been impressive, just as it was for the Allied armies in the Second World War.

To paraphrase Churchill in his and his country’s finest hour, Israel is proving herself yet again able to defend her home, to ride out the storm of war, and to outlive the menace of tyranny, if necessary for years, if necessary alone. At any rate, that is what she is going to try to do. It is the solemn duty of everyone who cares about the defeat of barbarism to stand beside her.
Hamasticide: Apocalyptic barbarians at the gates of Israel
Hamas senior leader Yahya Sinwar used his imagination well, ordering the tearing of children from their mothers’ arms and the killing of mothers in front of their children, inventing every possible way to make the terror more horrendous than that of ISIS, to exterminate in the cruelest manner possible. Sinwar commanded his men to kill babies; to brutally rape women of any age, whether alive or dead; to castrate men and boys; to decapitate; to burn entire families alive along with the symbols of their lives. Thus, he forever epitomized the savagery of his movement, making him the absolute leader of contemporary hatred.

Sinwar placed Hamas at the head of a worldwide movement for the deconstruction of history that legitimizes rage as the emblem of life. That believes that it must take this action against all of civilization. This movement has decided that the contemporary outcome of history and religion, including the Jewish-Christian civilization and the human rights culture, is advantageous only for those who created [it], and so it is a tool of oppression to be ripped to pieces. The diabolical choice to tear down this civilization permits any means to destroy the “colonialists,” the “imperialists,” the “racists,” the rich, the white men, and above all, of course, the Jews. This concept finds consensus far from Gaza, first in the Muslim world, which places the “Islamophobes” among the oppressors, and along with the students, the LGTBQ movements, the ecological movements that think the Earth will be destroyed by capitalist interests and the Jews.

The United Nations, the Palestinian Authority, and even the Ivy League universities have still not condemned Sinwar’s atrocities. It is a crime whose “context” is what counts, and nobody expected that after a massacre like Oct. 7, the destruction of contemporary civilization would piggyback on an antisemitic atrocity. The plan, unlike that of the Nazis in their time, was to destroy the Jews by publicizing as widely as possible the resolve to make them suffer one by one. Hamas leaders repeated the promise: “We did it, and we will do it again and again and again.”

Once the barbarians entered Israel, they roared down the roads by the hundreds in white pickup trucks and on motorbikes, shooting everyone they encountered, pedestrians and drivers, in the head and chasing those who tried to escape. They were divided into units, some assigned to close public roads, while others headed for the countryside and the kibbutzim. They were systematic, coming back to seize anyone who might have escaped them. They opened the doors of the cars abandoned at the sides of the roads to make sure everyone was dead and finish off the wounded. Then they came together to shout for joy over the bodies of the dead: Itbah el Yehud! Allah hu Akbar! They all shouted with the index finger raised, indicating their blasphemous oneness of God, the primal call of jihadism: “Allah is great.” By cutting off the head of a baby, the murderer was fulfilling the mission of reconquering the land occupied by the Jews, purifying it of the Western and democratic culture.
Jonathan Tobin: Jewish anti-Zionists can’t be part of our ‘big tent’ community
Historical memory lies at the heart of most Jewish holiday commemorations. During Sukkot, for example, Jews daily welcome ushpizin—“guests” or ancestors, including the patriarchs of Judaism—into their sukkahs, which themselves are a remembrance of the post-Exodus wanderings of the Jewish people in the desert. It is just one example of how identification with the past is very much part of the present. It also emphasizes the collective fate of a people on their way to their homeland, where shelter would hopefully no longer be a function of impermanent huts open to the stars. On Sukkot, we not only invite guests into our homes; it is a way we connect ourselves with that journey to Israel.

But for a small though noisy minority of contemporary American Jews, the fate of other Jews and Israel is no longer a matter with which they concern themselves. As a consequence, it is now more imperative than ever for Jews to stop pretending that one can join those chanting “from the river to the sea” and “globalize the intifada”—slogans that justify and encourage the genocide of the Jews of Israel—and still be considered part of the Jewish community.

Anti-Zionists may be considered Jewish according to religious law as well as mainstream by The New York Times. But in the post-Oct. 7 world, it should no longer be possible to pretend to speak for Jewish values or tradition, or to be part of the Jewish world, while opposing the right of the one Jewish state on the planet to exist and defend itself. That is true whether those who take that position explicitly—as do Jews who join the pro-Hamas demonstrators in America’s streets and on college campuses—or who merely rationalize their efforts from the sidelines or on the platforms provided to them by the liberal mainstream media.
From Ian:

Negotiating what with whom?
Does Austin not think Israel is trying to do that? What would make it “possible” sooner rather than later? Does he think that talking to Hamas will do it? Just this month, U.S. officials said Hamas senior leader Yahya Sinwar is the primary impediment to a deal. And again, to be fair to Austin, he goes where the president goes, and U.S. President Joe Biden said the country is “doubling down” on negotiations.

Instead of doubling down, the administration should try a different path—one with which the secretary of defense should be familiar.

In 1939, following years of belligerence and the Anschluss, Nazi Germany launched World War II with the invasion of Poland. The Blitzkrieg followed in May 1940. Then Dunkirk, the French surrender, the Battle of Britain, Operation Barbarossa and Stalingrad. The Axis surrendered in North Africa in May 1943.

Maybe that was enough. Maybe the Allies should have sued for a negotiated settlement, offering the Germans … what? Autonomy for France and a promise never to take back Alsace? It was, after all, largely German-speaking and not terribly happy with France anyhow.

Then, the siege of Leningrad ended in the east and Italy surrendered in the west; followed by D-Day and the liberation of Paris.

Maybe that was the time to offer the Nazis a deal they could live with; after all, a lot of civilians had already been killed.

While the Soviets moved westward, the Allies moved east. The Germans launched the Battle of the Bulge in December of 1944, intending to split the Allied forces and allow the Germans to encircle the Allied armies and force them to negotiate a peace treaty in Germany’s favor.

Maybe they’d only keep half the concentration camps.

The Allies kept going and on May 7, 1945, Germany surrendered. Unconditionally. VE Day was on May 8.

President Franklin Roosevelt was a very mixed bag for Jews, to put it kindly. But on unconditional surrender, he was right, opposing half-measures for temporary quiet in Europe that might have been mistaken for “peace.”

Back to the present: Negotiations work best when the parties agree on an endgame and discuss, even acrimoniously, how to get there. Israel seeks security for its people; the removal of the military and political power of Hamas and now Hezbollah as well; and the return of the hostages. As long as Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah and friends believe the endgame is the destruction of Israel, their surrender is necessary.

There was nothing then and there is nothing now to negotiate with evil.
Biden’s betrayal of Israel is clear weakness masquerading as policy
A refresher course on how we got here is apparently necessary for a White House that seems to have forgotten.

Hamas broke a cease-fire to launch the war with Israel more than a year ago with its barbaric invasion from Gaza.

Hezbollah, in a show of support, began its daily barrage of rockets and drones the very next day, forcing more than 60,000 Israelis to evacuate from their homes along the Lebanon border.

They still can’t go home, and Israel is still taking incoming fire from all sides, with Iran playing the role of puppet master and financier.

The mullahs are also firing on Israel, yet the White House is insisting all Israeli retaliation be modest.

Indeed, Biden reportedly extracted a promise from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that Israel’s response will not hit Iran’s oil fields or its nuclear facilities.

The argument against striking the oil fields is that taking Iran’s production off the global market would drive up prices everywhere.

The last thing Dems want is a spike in gasoline and heating oil prices as voters make their choice.

Perilous duel with Iran
The reason for the American ban on striking Iran’s nuclear facilities is less clear, although it surely reflects Biden’s constant fear of escalation.

It’s the same fear that has kept our ally Ukraine in a bloody stalemate with Russia.

Michael Oren, the former Israeli ambassador, likens the tit-for-tat limitation to a boxing strategy known as the “rope-a-dope.”

He cautions that “the knockout punch, the haymaker, is the Iranian nuclear weapon.”

Oren, writing in The Times of Israel, adds: “the only question is whether Israel is prepared to deliver ours first.”

That’s the crunch of the argument that Israel should strike the nuke plants before Iran gets a bomb and the missile to deliver it.

The clock is ticking, with some reports saying the mullahs could reach that point within weeks.

Netanyahu has often said Israel will never allow a nuclear-armed Iran because the mullahs have made it clear that eliminating Israel is their aim.

One former Iranian official even called Israel a “one bomb country,” meaning that’s all Iran would need.

Although Israel is said to be still debating how it will respond to Iran’s latest attack, it has greatly diminished both Hamas and Hezbollah and thus made Iran more vulnerable.

But Oren argues that a stalemate offers insufficient protection because Iran could throw its nuke punch without notice.

“Now is our chance to strike,” he concludes.

“We may not get another.”
Michael Oren: Israel Pays a Price for Delaying Its Retaliation against Iran
In a piece Mosaic published exactly one year ago today, Jonathan Schachter praised American military and rhetorical support for Israel, but also warned of the dangers of a “bear hug,” whereby U.S. aid becomes a tool for preventing the Jewish state from taking necessary actions to defend itself. Michael Oren fears Israel now finds itself in a similar situation in the wake of Iran’s October 1 missile attack, resulting in

a prolonged delay in Israel’s response that threatens our security no less than the missiles themselves. With each passing day of inaction, Israel’s casus belli grows weaker. If and when Israel acts, the world will scarcely remember why.

What, besides avoiding further friction with the White House, does Israel have to gain by waiting? . . . Can we use the American administration’s fear of our response to Iran to secure vital concessions from Washington?

One such concession would be the president’s agreement not to oppose Israel’s implementation of General Giora Eiland’s plan to declare northern Gaza a closed military zone and then trade territory for Hamas’s release of the hostages. Another concession would be a presidential commitment to intervene militarily against Iran’s nuclear plants once they enrich uranium above 60 percent. Yet another concession would be America’s agreement to sell us long-range strategic bombers capable of dropping 15,000 kilogram bunker-buster bombs from a height that Iran’s defenses cannot reach. Such a sale would say to the Iranians “we won’t bomb your facilities this time but we have the means to do so effectively in the future.”


In the past two days, as if to confirm Oren’s suspicions, the U.S. has begun transfer of the THAAD missile-defense system to Israel while reportedly extracting a promise that Israel will not attack Iran’s oil infrastructure or nuclear program. As to what Israel is getting in return, Washington also appears to be pressuring Jerusalem not to go through with the Eiland plan.
  • Wednesday, October 16, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
Another week, another long weekend holiday....(Don't forget Eruv Tavshilin!)

Here was the description of Sukkot in a Portland, Maine newspaper from 100 years ago:



And, as a bonus, a description of the Palestine Etrog trade in 1905 from The Jewish Herald:


Finally, a sukkah in Lebanon:



Chag kosher v'sameach! 




Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Wednesday, October 16, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon

By Forest Rain


Stress poisoning and bombs

On October 13th, I had a very interesting day. Too interesting. By the end of the day, I felt like I had been steam-rolled and it took me 24 hours to bring myself back to normal.

Of course, our normal here in Israel, particularly in the north, isn’t normal at all.

Our day began with a meeting with an important Israeli official in a Haifa coffee shop. The conversation was interrupted by the sound of sirens, screaming that we needed to race to the bomb shelter – only there was no shelter in the coffee shop. What do we do? Everyone got up, leaving their food and drinks on the table and ran across the street to the shelter in the nearest building.

Packed in the shelter of an apartment building with people we don’t know, we had to wait 10 minutes before leaving - because while the Iron Dome is excellent, no system works 100% of the time and shrapnel from the missile interceptions can continue to fall from the sky – so we continued our discussion with explosions overhead and a girl crying in the corner from stress.

Then we returned to the shop, paid our bill, and continued our day.

Later in the day, we drove toward the northern border.  

It’s not safe to travel to places under missile bombardment If you are in a shelter, that along with the Iron Dome is likely to keep you more or less safe (and even that is not 100% certain) but traveling between places, there is no shelter and no assurance that you won’t be hit.

But we wanted to see what was really happening to our country. Haifa is under bombardment and the communities along the way to the north have been bombarded even more than Haifa. Traveling that path is a risk but bombs can find you anywhere and the thought that any terrorist would succeed in terrorizing me into not going wherever I want in my own country made me so angry that there was no way I was staying home.

The communities bordering Lebanon have been evacuated for the last year. When the IDF entered Lebanon with ground forces, the area became a closed military zone – meaning that only the military or those approved by the military can travel there.

But from Haifa to Nahariya, life goes on. People live in their homes, go to work, shop, and send their kids to school (according to the assessments of the IDF Homefront Command which shuts down the schools when the bombings are too bad).

We decided to drive on the old road rather than the highway. The highway is faster but the old road has buildings along the way, making it possible to find shelter should we get caught outside when the sirens go off.

We popped in to check on our daughter-in-law who was by herself in their home near Nahariya. Our son, her husband, is enlisted and someplace in the north. That means worrying about him while being bombed. Fun stuff. She told us that although where they live there supposedly is 30 seconds to get to the shelter when the sirens go off, the explosions often come before the siren.

We had a nice visit and continued further north.

After Nahariya, soldiers stand guard closing the area to unnecessary travel – for the protection of civilians and to make it easier for the army to do what they need to do. The soldiers we talked to were pleasant (as our soldiers usually are) but also anxious (which is not usual at all). They were concerned about Hezbollah UAVs invading and bombing them. It was later in the day when we saw just how justified their concern was…

It was getting dark. Definitely, time to go home. That’s when the sirens went off.

We were on the road, nowhere near any kind of shelter. We did what other drivers did – stopped the car on the side of the road and ran down a small incline as far away from the cars as we could get. There was a ditch that provided some semblance of protection so we laid down and covered our heads, as the Home Front Command instructs us to do. When missiles hit shrapnel flies up at an angle so the best bet is to be flat on the ground and cover your head. 

The sound of the siren blaring from the nearest community and my phone was nerve-wracking enough. Then I saw on the app update that the sirens were due to an incoming UAV. Then we heard explosions - the IDF trying to intercept – which is more difficult to do than with missiles that have a defined trajectory.

So there I was face down in a ditch, in the dark, shaking and cursing my curiosity. Len covered me with his body. He wanted me to feel safe and calm down so he made jokes to distract me. I laughed. Then I heard a little girl wailing in terror. She was further down the road with whoever it was that was trying to take her home. None of us were hurt but if I was shaking, how would a small child feel?


How long do you wait before moving when it’s a UAV attack and not a missile? I could see on my app that alerts were going off further south so obviously the UAV was moving in that direction, away from us. I assumed that it would be shot down closer to Haifa.

We got in the car and continued on the way home.

Outside Nahariya, the sirens went off again. This time missiles. Like all the other drivers on the road, we pulled over and got out to run to the nearest shelter. There wasn’t anything close and there wasn’t time. Some people stopped next to a wall that couldn’t really help. We were close to the mall so we ran in that direction, hoping to find an entrance. A building outside the mall looked like a bomb shelter but it was closed. It took us a moment to figure out that it was an electricity generator room for the mall (so not a place to go inside). So we stood in between the wall of that building and the wall of the mall, a relatively good place to be. Women from Nahariya were reluctant to stand where we were because they were wearing flip-flops and there were thorny bushes under our feet. But what’s a few scrapes in compared with flying shrapnel? We encouraged them to come in and they waited with us. One had a 10 or 12 year old daughter. She was silent but had tears in her eyes and her face was twisted in fear.

I swallowed my own pounding heart to smile and tell her she was very brave and doing a great job. It is absolutely infuriating to see children being terrorized – and children should not see grown-ups afraid.

There were no more sirens on the way to Haifa. When we arrived we thought we’d take some time to sit outside on the beautiful promenade overlooking the bay, breathe some fresh air, and relax before going home.

The weather was beautiful and the view stunning, as always.


And then, from the base at the bottom of the Carmel we heard their loudspeakers: “Warning! Be prepared for impact! Take shelter!”

What the hell?! First of all it was shocking that we could hear what was happening from so far away. And my reflexive response was, why do our soldiers have to be prepared for impact?! Hezbollah should be preparing for impact!!

And then they shot an intercept missile, bright like a streak of fire into the night sky. The trajectory was so steep, at first it wasn’t clear what direction it was going in – my body tensed before my mind understood what it was seeing. It looked like it went to Lebanon. The light disappeared and then we heard the sound of the explosion rolling back at us like a wave coming in from the sea.

Looking at my phone to see updates on what happened, I began seeing the lists of wounded roll in. The UAV that didn’t explode on us flew all the way to Benyamina and exploded on people there. A lot of people (later we learned that they were soldiers – 4 were killed, dozens wounded, some critically).

We went home and began to unwind from the too intense day. I understood that my body was washed with adrenaline, and I needed to decompress or suffer from stress poisoning, so I drank a lot of water.  

And then the sirens went off.

We raced down the stairs to the shelter and listened to the huge explosions of the missile interceptions over our house.

It wasn’t easy to relax and go to sleep after all that but finally we managed – only to be woken up too early in the morning by sirens.

That was just one day when nothing happened to us.

 



Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Wednesday, October 16, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon


France24 reports:

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should not forget his country was created as a result of a resolution adopted by the United Nations, French President Emmanuel Macron told cabinet on Tuesday, urging Israel to abide by UN decisions.

“Mr Netanyahu must not forget that his country was created by a decision of the UN,” Macron told the weekly French cabinet meeting, referring to the resolution adopted in November 1947 by the United Nations General Assembly on the plan to partition Palestine into a Jewish state and an Arab state.

“Therefore this is not the time to disregard the decisions of the UN,” he added, as Israel wages a ground offensive against the Iran-backed Shiite militant group Hezbollah in southern Lebanon, where the UN peacekeepers are deployed.
First of all, the statement is false. The UN did not create Israel, and the UN partition resolution was never implemented. 

Jews created Israel. Jews who worked tirelessly since the 19th century, buying land, building cities, draining swamps, building a government, all while defending themselves. When Israel declared its independence in 1948 it was despite UN and US) desires, not because of them. 

But there is a more insidious part of this friendly reminder, perfectly articulated by Arab Israeli diplomat George Deek:

As I hear a world leader reminding Israel that it “was created by a UN decision,” it’s a perfect moment to address why European elites seem particularly vexed by Israel’s independence— and why they expect obedience.

For those European elites, the right of self-determination of the French, Palestinians, or Chinese, is framed as a matter of justice: an inherent, unconditional right of a people to their land. But when it comes to the Jews, the narrative shifts. Their right to self-determination is not viewed as intrinsic, but as an act of European compassion—granted out of guilt for the Holocaust. In this view, Israel exists not because of a millennia-old connection to the land, or because of global rejection or because of Zionist activity, but because Europe, burdened by its conscience, graciously allowed the Jews a state through the UN.

This paternalist narrative strips Jews of their agency and their deep historical ties to Israel. But much worse, it turns their right to a homeland into something conditional—a “gift” from Europe. And like any gift, it can be revoked if the recipient misbehaves.

And this is where the obsession with Israel kicks in. If Europe believes it bestowed Israel’s right to exist, then it assumes the authority to judge Israel’s conduct. The Jews, unlike other nations, are expected to earn their right to sovereignty daily by conforming to the standards set by their “benefactors.” Fail to do so, and the right that was “given” can be questioned—or withdrawn.
This is exactly right. For all other peoples, self-determination is an eternal right - for Jews, it is only temporarily allowed against the world's better judgment. 

And that's the thing. The world doesn't really think the Jews are a people, or that they have any connection to the Land of Israel, or that they have the right to defend themselves.  They'll pretend that those things are true, but when it comes down to it, they don't act like they believe it. 



Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

AddToAny

EoZ Book:"Protocols: Exposing Modern Antisemitism"

Printfriendly

EoZTV Podcast

Podcast URL

Subscribe in podnovaSubscribe with FeedlyAdd to netvibes
addtomyyahoo4Subscribe with SubToMe

search eoz

comments

Speaking

translate

E-Book

For $18 donation








Sample Text

EoZ's Most Popular Posts in recent years

Hasbys!

Elder of Ziyon - حـكـيـم صـهـيـون



This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For 20 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.

Donate!

Donate to fight for Israel!

Monthly subscription:
Payment options


One time donation:

Follow EoZ on Twitter!

Interesting Blogs

Blog Archive