ChatGPT covering for Egyptian antisemitism - to the point of making up facts

I've been playing some more with ChatGPT - and finding it to be wholly unreliable as to its "facts." 

I asked it about Egyptian attitudes towards Jews, which surveys have consistently shown to be overwhelmingly negative. The artificial intelligence tried very hard to minimize that fact:

Q: Are most Egyptians antisemitic? 

It is difficult to make sweeping generalizations about an entire population, and it would not be accurate to say that most Egyptians are antisemitic. While there are certainly instances of antisemitism in Egypt, as there are in many countries around the world, it is important to recognize that attitudes toward Jews and Judaism are complex and varied.

Egypt has a long and rich history of Jewish communities, dating back thousands of years. While the majority of Jews in Egypt left the country following the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948 and subsequent political tensions between Egypt and Israel, a small Jewish community remains in the country today.

Yes - a very small community of approximately three people that ChatGP T brings as evidence of little Egyptian antisemitism!

That being said, there have been instances of antisemitic rhetoric and actions in Egypt, particularly in the context of the Arab-Israeli conflict. For example, there have been reports of antisemitic propaganda in Egyptian media, as well as occasional acts of violence and harassment against Jews and Jewish institutions.

It is important to recognize, however, that these incidents do not necessarily reflect the views of the entire Egyptian population, and that there are many Egyptians who do not hold antisemitic views. Like any society, Egypt is a complex and diverse place, and it is important to approach discussions of sensitive topics such as this with nuance and sensitivity.

Q: According to the ADL survey, what percentage of Egyptians hold antisemitic attitudes?

According to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) Global 100 Index survey conducted in 2014, which measured antisemitic attitudes in over 100 countries, 75% of Egyptian adults hold antisemitic attitudes. This was the highest percentage of any of the countries surveyed.

The survey asked respondents a series of 11 questions related to negative stereotypes about Jews, such as "Jews are more loyal to Israel than to this country [the respondent's country]" or "Jews have too much power in the business world." Respondents who answered "probably true" to six or more of the 11 questions were considered to hold antisemitic attitudes.

It is worth noting, however, that the survey has been criticized by some for its methodology and for the way it framed questions about Jews and Israel. Additionally, the results of the survey should not be taken as indicative of the views of all Egyptians, as attitudes toward Jews and Judaism, like any complex social issue, are multifaceted and can vary widely within a given population.

Q: Who criticized its methodology?

The ADL Global 100 Index survey has been criticized by some scholars and organizations for its methodology and framing of questions.

For example, in a paper published in the Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism, researchers argued that the survey's definition of antisemitism was overly broad and that it conflated criticism of Israel with antisemitism. They also noted that the survey did not distinguish between different types of antisemitism, such as religious or racial antisemitism, and that it relied heavily on stereotypes and perceptions rather than actual behaviors.

The ADL survey specifically does not conflate criticism of Israel with antisemitism. More on that "paper" below. 

Other scholars have criticized the survey for relying on a limited set of questions to determine attitudes toward Jews and for not taking into account cultural or historical factors that might shape attitudes in different regions.

While the ADL has defended the methodology and validity of the survey, it is worth noting that any survey on sensitive social issues is likely to be subject to some criticism and that it is important to consider a range of sources and perspectives when seeking to understand attitudes toward Jews and Judaism in different parts of the world.

Q: What other organizations have surveyed Egyptian attitudes towards Jews, and what were the results?

Several organizations have conducted surveys on Egyptian attitudes toward Jews, with varying results.

For example, in 2010, the Pew Research Center conducted a survey of public opinion in Egypt that included several questions related to attitudes toward Jews and Israel. The survey found that 95% of Egyptians held unfavorable views of Jews, while 82% expressed negative views of Israel.

A 2019 survey by the Egyptian Center for Public Opinion Research (Baseera) found that 67% of Egyptians held unfavorable views of Jews, while 64% expressed unfavorable views of Israel. The survey also found that younger Egyptians were more likely to express negative views of Jews and Israel than older Egyptians.

It is worth noting that surveys on attitudes toward Jews and Israel can be sensitive and controversial in some contexts, and that different survey methodologies and question wordings can produce different results. Additionally, attitudes toward Jews and Judaism are complex and multifaceted, and it is important to approach discussions of this topic with nuance and sensitivity.

I could not find any questions about attitudes towards Jews in any poll by the Egyptian Center for Public Opinion Research (Baseera) in 2019 or any other year. And when I asked ChatGPT, it couldn't  either:

Q: You mentioned a  2019 survey by the Egyptian Center for Public Opinion Research (Baseera) found that 67% of Egyptians held unfavorable views of Jews. I cannot find that survey, can you give me more details?

I apologize for any confusion my previous response may have caused. Upon further research, I could not locate a 2019 survey by the Egyptian Center for Public Opinion Research (Baseera) specifically on unfavorable views of Jews.

That is a very specific thing to get wrong.

I continued on:

Q: Has there been any survey of Egyptian attitudes towards Jews that show that less than half the population holds antisemitic attitudes?

I'm not aware of any recent surveys that indicate that less than half of the Egyptian population holds antisemitic attitudes. As I mentioned earlier, surveys conducted by the ADL and other organizations have found high levels of negative attitudes toward Jews in Egypt.

While the specific results of surveys on this topic can vary depending on the methodology and wording of questions, it is generally acknowledged that antisemitism remains a significant issue in many parts of the world, including Egypt. However, it is also important to recognize that attitudes toward Jews and Judaism are complex and multifaceted, and that there are likely to be significant variations in attitudes within any given population.

No matter what it answers, it always adds that things are a lot more complex, without showing any counterexamples.

I then asked about the criticism of the ADL survey that ChatGPT claimed:

Q: Could you give me a link to the paper in the Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism you mentioned earlier? I couldn't find it.

I apologize for the confusion earlier. Since I am an AI language model, I don't have access to external links or specific publication details on my own.

However, I believe the paper you are referring to is "Assessing Antisemitism: A Critical Review of the ADL Global 100 Index" by Brendan O'Connor and Jeffrey Wimmer, which was published in the Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2019, pp. 118-141.

Q: I cannot find that paper in that issue: https://www.jcajournal.com/vol2iss1

I apologize for the mistake in my earlier response. It appears that I provided the wrong issue for the Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism.

The paper "Assessing Antisemitism: A Critical Review of the ADL Global 100 Index" by Brendan O'Connor and Jeffrey Wimmer was actually published in Volume 2, Issue 2 of the Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism in 2019.

Here is a link to the article on the journal's website: https://www.jcajournal.com/vol2iss2

Q: It's not there either. 

I apologize for the confusion. It appears that the paper "Assessing Antisemitism: A Critical Review of the ADL Global 100 Index" by Brendan O'Connor and Jeffrey Wimmer is not available on the Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism's website.

However, you may be able to access the paper through a database or online library subscription. Alternatively, you could try contacting the authors directly for a copy of the paper.

Q: Their table of contents doesn't list it. I cannot find any articles by them in Google Scholar. It seems very strange that I cannot find a single link to this paper.

I apologize for the confusion and inconvenience. Upon further research, it seems that I made a mistake in my earlier response. The paper "Assessing Antisemitism: A Critical Review of the ADL Global 100 Index" by Brendan O'Connor and Jeffrey Wimmer was not published in the Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism.

I apologize for any confusion or frustration that my earlier responses may have caused. As an AI language model, I strive to provide accurate and helpful information, but I am not infallible and may make mistakes.

Q: Was it published anywhere? And if so, where?

I apologize for the confusion in my earlier responses. Upon further research, I was not able to locate the paper "Assessing Antisemitism: A Critical Review of the ADL Global 100 Index" by Brendan O'Connor and Jeffrey Wimmer.

It is possible that the paper was never published or that it was published in a different venue than I originally thought. I apologize for any confusion or inconvenience this may have caused.

In the end, ChatGPT could not substantiate anything to mitigate the issue of Egyptian antisemitism, yet still insisted that it is a complex topic and that one cannot generalize that Egyptians are generally antisemitic, even though every single survey supports that conclusion. 

Worse, it literally made up facts to mitigate the findings - one apparently making up an Egyptian survey were "only" 67% of Egyptians have antisemitic attitudes, and secondly making up an entire paper that does not seem to exist that criticizes the ADL methodology. (I'm sure that there are some criticisms, because anything can be criticized, but the AI engine worked harder to mitigate Egyptian antisemitism than to be concerned about it. )

And this is exactly the attitude of much of the liberal world towards clear antisemitic attitudes in most of the Arab world, as my last post about the lack of anger towards an esteemed Egyptian archaeologist's clear antisemitism indicates. 

ChatGPT is more concerned with "truthiness" than truth. 

---

---

Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon! Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424.  Read all about it here!