Americans secretly meeting with Hamas?

The only source for this story is the bizarro Iranian news agency IRNA, but they don't usually make things up out of thin air. And it is altogether possible that they have sources in the PA that others do not.

Several European and Western diplomats have secretly been meeting with leaders of the Islamic Resistance Group, Hamas lately, Palestinian Islamic sources said.

The sources intimated that American, British, French and Scandinavian diplomats met lately with Hamas leaders, including newly-elected lawmakers, in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Hamas leader and elected lawmaker Muhammed Abu Tir was quoted as saying on Tuesday that he had met with a British diplomat who is close to British Prime Minister Tony Blair.

Abu Tir did not reveal the identity of the diplomat nor did he say when the meeting took place.

Last week, a number of British diplomats as well as several former American diplomats met with Hamas leaders in the Hebron area as well as the northern part of the West Bank.

The two sides reportedly discussed Hamas's political outlook following its resounding victory over Fatah in the January 25 elections.

Hamas, observers say, has been displaying moderation.

(I wasn't kidding when I said "bizarro.")

The story is somewhat believable. I could see a former US ambassador to some Arab state talking to Hamas with unofficial US approval.

The Western desire to do something, anything to make it look like there is progress in the moribund "peace process" means that they will inevitably inch towards dealing with Hamas. There is zero chance that the West will throw up their hands and admit that there will be no peace with Hamas in power. The strong instinct for wishful thinking will kick in soon enough, and that means that any absence of outright calls for genocide on the part of Hamas will require pressure on Israel to reciprocate with money or land to reward Hamas' "pragmatism."

Read More

Zionist technology used for Iranian Jew-hatred

At least some Jews are getting rich off the Iranian mass psychosis.

The larger-than-life mural lionising Reem Saleh al-Riyashi, a Palestinian female suicide bomber, is as vivid an illustration as any of the Islamic republic's implacable hostility to Israel.

Two years ago, al-Riyashi entered the realms of Palestinian martyrdom when she blew herself up, killing four Israelis in the process, at the Erez crossing point in Gaza. Today, motorists and passersby gazing down from Motahari Street, in central Tehran, can contemplate her grimly resolute features as she holds her young son in one hand and a gun in the other.

Next to her portrait, set against a backdrop showing the Jerusalem landmark the Dome of the Rock and two booted feet trampling an Israeli flag, is another giant picture celebrating the actions of a further seven Palestinian women suicide bombers.

On the face of it, the banners are the highly predictable artistic reflection of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's recent wave of fervently anti-Zionist rhetoric, in which he called for Israel to be "wiped off the map" and dismissed the Holocaust as a myth. But there is one twist: they have been created with technology made in Israel.

Experts in Iran's printing industry say they are typical of images produced by hi-tech digital printers made by Scitiex Vision, based in Tel Aviv. Printing equipment originating in Israel is commonly used in Iran.

"Those two banners are five metres wide, and no printing company other than Scitex produces that kind of technology," said one Tehran printing company owner, who requested anonymity. "The large-format printing industry is Israeli-led. Their equipment is very reliable. The result is that Israeli-made equipment is sold in Iran, and a lot of the anti-Israeli and anti-American propaganda you see here is made by this kind of equipment.

"Last year a company run by a friend of mine produced a mural listing a number of goods produced in Israel and saying: 'By boycotting these products, let's give a punch in the mouth to Israel.' But he made it using a Scitex machine. We laughed about it."

Iranian intermediary companies import the Israeli-made printing machines into the country, bypassing the Islamic regime's ban on trade with Israel by buying the equipment in a third country and then rebranding it under another name. Scitex machines are purchased in Holland under the brand Blaze and then exported to Iran; printers made by another Israeli firm, Nur, are bought in Belgium and disguised for the Iranian market under various names, including Salsa.

Printing industry insiders say the Iranian authorities are either unaware of the practice or turn a blind eye. As a result, most of the campaign posters for this year's presidential election - including those for Mr Ahmadinejad - were churned out using Israeli technology. Experts also believe it was Israeli printers that produced the banner for the recent World Without Zionism conference, at which Mr Ahmadinejad made his first call for the Jewish state to be wiped out.

Iranian print specialists are convinced the Israeli manufacturers know their products are bound for Iran. "The whole thing is to the benefit of the Israeli companies," said the printing company boss. "They sell to a country that is officially banned from trading with them, meaning they have no after-sale service obligation.

But the move towards printed propaganda, especially using Israeli technology, has left many revolutionary artists disillusioned. Falling demand has forced Khasrow Karami to pay off several artists at his gallery, in an old disused cinema. Having once specialised in images of Ayatollah Khomeini and the Iran-Iraq war - in which he was seriously wounded - Mr Karami, 43, is now painting advertising posters for the Canadian government urging Iranians to emigrate to Canada.

"I would rather be painting martyrs from the war than doing this. It's a big contradiction," said Mr Karami. "When I heard that this banner-printing equipment was being imported from Israel, it was a heavy blow for me. It leaves us confused about what we should believe. Do we accept the government's propaganda against Israel or do we admire the Israelis' brilliant technological innovation?"

Read More

Those infidel, Mohammed cartoon-printing Egyptians

Sandmonkey saw that Egyptian newspaper Al Fagr printed the Mohammed cartoons - last October!

Hat tip LGF via Solomonia.

Read More

Well-spoken fanaticism

I stumbled onto Islamiblog, where a devout Muslim tries to describe his feelings about the cartoons. He is clearly in pain, soft-spoken, earnest, literate - and wishes dearly that we should all live in a shari'a state where the people who publish such blasphemy would be killed.

In response to some queries on why I haven't written something specifically on the abuse of the Prophet (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam), then that is because:

1. Many good people have written enough about it already

2. I feel too ashamed, living in Europe, to write when I know what the Shari'ah demands of us

Let there be no doubt: the crime of belittling the Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam) results in instant death for the Muslim by unanimous opinion of the scholars, and the majority believe it to be the case as well for the Dhimmi and the Musta'man (those who have peace treaties etc) living in the Muslim lands under Islamic Law. That is how serious a crime this is.

As for these Europeans that are reviling the Prophet under their 'law' then we're at a dead end. As these non-Muslims are our own people living under their own law, we are forbidden to do anything that would contravene that law. How shameful for us.

Want to get an inside opinion on how I'm feeling at the moment on this subject? Have a little read of al-Shifa by Qadhi 'Iyadh (r) or if you're feeling really upto it, al-Sarim al-Maslul by Ibn Taymiyyah (r) and then tell me to calm down.

Why do we not have Shari'ah to preserve the Prophet's honour? Where is our Ameer al-Mu'mineen to run and avenge the Prophet (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam)? Where is that strength of the Believers that would make these criminals think twice before they lie under the banner of 'free speech'?

Seeing as we have no Shari'ah and seeing as we have no Leader and seeing as that we're struggling to gather even a motley crew of good enough 'believers' to grace the word 'Islam', then let us put our heads down in shame and humiliation, and let all those who can do something they feel worthwhile, do it.

Let us boycott, let us demonstrate, let us make our feelings known, let us educate, let us show the higher ethic - but let us also realise our individual pathetic state when we know the greatest of creation has been reviled and the criminals walk around smiling, and we just talk the talk and sell more European newspapers.

Wa Allahu Musta'an.

I know I shouldn't have written anything, because I find it difficult with such topics to control anything I write or say (cf the khutbah) descending into uncontrolled emotional rhetoric - so let me stop there and have mercy on my head and let the honourable Shaykh Riyad Nadwi put it a whole lot better than I ever will.

These are the people that scare me - seeming moderates who are against the current violence (like the editor of Arab American News who was on MSNBC tonight) yet when they speak frankly, they are only against the violence because it makes them look bad - but they truly believe that the cartoonists deserve to die for their "crime."

They sound so normal on TV, yet their goal is the exact same as Bin Laden and Ahmadinejad - world Islamic domination where they can enforce strict Islamic law on everyone.

Read More

OK, here are the cartoons

Here are some of the recent search keywords that hit my blog:

danish mohamed prophet cartoons turbine bomb
sam hamod on danish cartoons
danish cartoon mohamad turbine
flemming rose cartoons
flemming rose jewish
actual danish cartoon of prophet
is flemming rose jewish
flemming rose neocon
flemming rose
publication of the cartoon truly insults the dignity of muslims
view danish islamic cartoons
flemming rose caricature
arab cartoons jews

Clearly there is intense interest for people to actually see these cartoons.

So, as a public service, here is a reproduction of the cartoons that I found (just linking to Support Denmark):

To compare offensiveness, here are some random anti-Jewish cartoons from a 3 month period in 2002 of the sort that the Arab world publishes daily, courtesy of the ADL:

A stereotypical Jewish caricature is shown pointing to an acquiescent President Bush saying "He understands Hebrew, not Arabic."

Uncle Sam is shown cleaning up after the bloody tracks of Israel,
shown as a stereotypical Jewish caricature.

Jewish caricature is writing the "The USA's modern history."

A Jewish caricature writes President Bush's speech. The caption reads "America's attitude towards Gaza's massacre."

A Jewish devil - possibly Ariel Sharon - walks over the skulls of its victims.

The Jew on the right says: "Say: 'I hate the Arabs'!", and the American on the left repeats: "I hate the Arabs, I hate the Arabs".

Remember, a black hat and beard is not something Zionists or most Israelis wear; just religious Jews.

Read More

Why the Muslims will lose the cartoon war

As the cartoon kerfuffle spirals out of control and the death-toll increases, it is clear that this is one battle that the Muslims will lose.

I recently wrote that the reason that Arabs are so absurdly upset over the publication of the Mohammed cartoons was because it showed Arab impotence. Because their initial protests were not reacted to instantly the way that Europe usually does, they keep upping the ante until they get noticed and treated with respect. Recent history shows that threats of riots bring this bizarre respect that is craved, and the illusion of relevance.

The centuries-long slide into irrelevance of the Arab world that I described hit two major speedbumps in the middle of the 20th century:

1. Oil became the most important fuel in the world, and the Arab countries ended up on top of it.
2. The liberal backlash against European colonialism turned into a religion of its own where anyone who is not from old Europe is automatically presumed to have a moral advantage.

It took a couple of decades for Arabs to use oil as a weapon, but they wasted no time to take advantage of their newfound allies on the Left, painting their billion adherents as an oppressed minority.

Either way, these two developments gave the Arabs a taste of what they had been losing for so long - the feeling of power, the impression that they can influence world events again. Oil made the Arab world an economic power and their liberal friends gave them a way to start to literally take over Europe with little protest.

Their power over European colonial guilt became close to absolute, turning tiny Israel into a perceived colonialist state and shielding the Arabs themselves from most criticism. The European liberal press was a major component of their brief rise to relevance and perceived power.

Their friends in the Europress might be willing to go along with their agenda as long as it is only indirectly anti-semitic and anti-American (remember, the Europeans are chafing under their relative irrelevance since World War II as well), but when the Arab world starts attacking the freedom of the press in the Western world, they don't stand a chance.

After all, the press has its own religion, with only one commandment: We shall publish whatever we want.

Freedom of the press is far more difficult to limit than other freedoms, because in our increasingly connected world it is easier to read the newspapers from China on the Internet than to go outside and pick up the one delivered to your house. The almost total voluntary ban on the Mohammed cartoons in US newspapers is meaningless when anyone can find them online with a single click. (It is still instructive that the AP refuses to even distribute the pictures to its member newspapers for them to make theie own choice of publishing them.)

When Iran publishes its Holocaust denial cartoons, the reaction from blogs will be not just publishing mild caricatures of Mohammed. They will create cartoons of Mohammed screwing camels and raping little girls. The Muslim world will get an idea of what real bad taste is, comparable to the explicitly anti-semitic cartoons that they see daily in their mainstream newspapers. In comparison, the Danish cartoons will look like they published the Koran in Arabic.

While there will be speedbumps (such as Google's capitulation to Chinese censorship), the Internet will ensure that everything will be available to everyone, and the Arab world will get more and more used to it the way everyone else has.

And their allies in the European press are already thinking twice about their support for regimes that are so opposed to their own holy mission.

In the end, the middle-east Muslims (who are the only ones violently protesting the cartoons) will lose the cartoon war, just as their short stewardship over the world's energy reserves will disappear in a few decades. Unfortunately, there will be many more casualties before that happens.

UPDATE: When I predicted what the blogs would do, I wasn't aware that they already were doing it.

Read More

The Mufti's short-lived rival

The infamous Mufti of Jerusalem waged a reign of terror from 1936-39 in Palestine, not only against Jews but against Arab rivals as well.

His amazing and under-reported war against all who opposed his leadership resulted in 3000 murders and over 18,000 Arabs fleeing Palestine out of fear.

One man emerged as a rival to the Mufti. Fakhri Bey Nashashibi wrote a letter to the British High Commissioner in 1938 detailing the corruption and crimes of the supposed leader of the Palestinian Arabs:

Keep in mind that then, as today, "moderate" is a relative term. It is clear that Fakhri Bey was against partition, he was against legally selling any land to Jews to the point of condoning murder, he supported terror against Jews. But he was against corruption and against the Mufti.

His fight to marginalize the Mufti intensified in 1939, with a detailed letter to Arab leaders with more accusations against the Mufti, where censorship did not allow his original letter to become known to the mainstream Arab communities. Particularly stinging was his accusations of how money meant for charities were being diverted to the Mufti terror campaign, and how "no school was opened, no hospital built, no mosque erected, anywhere in Palestine during the long years of Haj Amin's administration."

The end of the story is predictable. Fakhri Bey was murdered by a "Palestinian terrorist" in Baghdad in November, 1941.

Read More

Arab comedian Hassan Al-Haifi

The Yemen Times employs one of the most talented Arab comedians on the planet. His name is Hassan Al-Haifi, and his is one of the most consistently hilarious voices on the Arab scene.

His main shtick is if anything happens on the planet that hurts anyone - it's gotta be the Jews.

Some priceless routines of his:

• The Zionists were behind the USS Cole attack.
• The Zionists were behind Monica Lewinsky.
• Zionist-backed Americans are behind the Iraqi insurgents;
• Mossad is also behind the Iraqi insurgents;
• Zionists plan to control the entire world production of fossil fuels;
• "The Arabs will someday wake up to find that they will only be able to buy meat with a coupon stamped by the Jewish Defense League or the Untied Jewish Appeal."
• AIPAC was behind a supposed decision by Yahoo to drop the Yemen Times from its distributions;
• Zionists were behind the French ban on Hezbollah Terror TV;
• Zionists were behind the kidnapping of four Christian workers in Iraq;
• Zionists bombed Iraqi churches;
  
• Zionists were behind the Istanbul bombings;
• Zionists were behind massacres in Bosnia;
• AIDS and "Foot and Mouth disease" are punishments from God for the Western support of Zionists.

Classic stuff! The guy should put out an album of his favorite rants.

Is it any surprise that he knows who is behind the cartoons?

Read More

South Africa Dhimmis

South Africa has chosen dhimmitude over freedom of the press, with an amazing display of tortured logic.

The controversial interdict passed on Friday by the Johannesburg High Court, banning the publication of the infamous Danish cartoon strip depicting caricatures of the revered Islamic figure Prophet Mohammed, may be frustrating to the media fraternity but it does well to remind us that most of the rights in the Bill of Rights are not absolute and can – and will – be limited should the need arise.

An obvious example is the limitation of the right to equality in labour practice, where fair discrimination is condoned.

The section within the Bill of Rights granting the right to freedom of expression also expressly limits the right. In other words, the right to freedom of expression is inherently limited even before being limited by other competing rights, such as the right to dignity.

According to the Bill of Rights, the right to freedom of expression, which includes freedom of the press and other media, “does not extend to incitement of imminent violence or advocacy of hatred that is based on race, ethnicity, gender or religion, and that constitutes incitement to cause harm”.

The caricature cartoons, which were commissioned by one Flemming Rose, a supporter of the anti-Islamic Zionist "clash of civilizations" Neo-Cons behind the “war on terror”, were drafted with the intention to insult and outrage Muslims – an aim well achieved.

The surge of violent protests emanating from the Arab world in response to the cartoons is an indication that the publication of the cartoons in South Africa may incite violence from the Muslim community and, because the source intended the cartoons to advocate hatred based on religion, the publication in South Africa could very well constitute “incitement to cause harm”.

A law professor at Wits University has said that although the cartoons did not amount to hate speech, they did amount to an incitement of violence and, as such, limit the press’ right to publish them.

The Media Institute of Southern Africa – a member of the International Freedom of Expression Exchange – has said that the interdict is an “unacceptable intrusion on media freedom and freedom of expression by the courts and believes it is unconstitutional”.

The interdict will be challenged in court by at least one media organisation on 28 February 2006.

In the real world, it is true that there are limits on freedom of the press from inciting violence. But that is inciting violence against the victims, not by the victims! Cartoons that call for the eradication of Islam could be considered incitement, but these cartoons that are less offensive than even the commentary above in its description of Flemming Rose's motivations.

In other words, by flipping the definition of "incitement to violence" into referring to violence from the supposed victims, it changes the intent of the law from reducing violence to increasing it! It gives effective veto power over any article by the press to the victim group - by threatening violence. This ridiculous reasoning ends up chilling freedom and rewarding violence, the exact opposite of its intent.

Not only that, but the hypocrisy in South Africa is stunning. It's Almost Supernatural points out to overtly anti-Jewish themes in recent SA "anti-Zionist" cartoons:
Also, there was a recent incident where a Muslim radio station in Cape Town broadcast explicitly anti-semitic material, and SA Muslims screamed about freedom of speech for over a year defending it.

As always, see It's Almost Supernatural for details on what's happening in South Africa.

Read More

Why Arabs are so pissed off

A lot of the pundits that are analyzing the cartoon kerfuffle are missing the point.

The reality is inadvertently revealed in this bizarre but neat bit of psychological projection, courtesy of Arab News:

Let me step back for a moment to give a little background information that may help you make better sense of what is happening.

For a number of years now Western nations have suffered from a growing doubt; they fear that the global hegemony the West has enjoyed for the last couple of centuries is finally coming to an end.

This uncomfortable realization is by no means confined to Westerners; in fact most non-Western people have come to believe this as well.

So a gradual, but perceptible, fading of their global hegemony coupled with a growing fear of an uncertain future motivates Western society to intimidate weak nations in an attempt to keep their power unchallenged and intact.

A US neocon put it very succinctly when he said (I am not quoting exactly): “We must periodically find a weak country, hold it against the wall and slap it around to impress others”.

The ideal target for Westerners has been the Muslim world, due to its extensiveness and perceived weakness.

The current assault on our Prophet by the Danes and other Europeans must be seen within this context.

The deluded author subconsciously reveals the true roots of Muslim rage: it is Muslim impotence.

Centuries of the Muslim world consistently losing against the West in every field of endeavor that matters - scientific, military, cultural - coupled with an almost genetic Arab (not Muslim) sense of pride - brings an incredible dissonance between their beliefs that the world will inevitably become a Muslim ummah, and reality.

When someone who craves control finds that he is irrelevant, he will latch onto anything to make himself feel important.

Almost worse than the fact that the cartoons were published at all, from the Muslim viewpoint, the fact that they were published by a small irrelevant Danish newspaper - and they still couldn't control even that. They couldn't get the automatic condemnation that they expected. They couldn't call upon one of their perceived bases of power - their ability to control the European Left with impunity.

Every Muslim demonstration, with imams whipping up the crowds into a frenzy, is an attempt at relevance - if they can scare the Western world to move even a little bit, their sense of pride is somewhat restored and they can go to sleep with their delusions that they matter. Threats of economic sanctions or oil boycotts are nothing more than pathetic attempts to show that they have a little bit of control left in this world.

Terror serves exactly the same purpose. The very asymmetry of terror, where a small number of people can instill fear in a much larger population, is a way to show relevance for a people who cannot compete on a level playing field. This is why terror is celebrated by such a huge percentage of the Arab world, even as they pretend to denounce it - they are proud that they can still make a difference.

Unfortunately, this is not a problem that can be cured by counseling or self-esteem books.

There is an entire other dimension to this psychological history of the Arab (and to some extent the Muslim) world, but it will have to wait for another time.

Read More

Excellent Amona article at Treppenwitz

He says it better and with much more knowledge than I did.

Read More

Arab terrorist bravely stabs 60 year old woman to death

A woman was murdered and five other people sustained wounds after a Palestinian terrorist of about 20 stabbed Route 51 minibus passengers in the town of Petach Tikva, east of Tel Aviv, Sunday morning.

Four of the stab victims are reportedly in serious condition, while another was lightly injured. MDA Director-General Eli Bin said the murder victim, a woman of about 60, sustained numerous stab wounds in her chest and abdomen.

Just waiting for the condemnations pouring in from the Muslim world. Any minute now.

UPDATE: Hamas never disappoints:

On the murder of an Israeli woman and injuring of five others near Tel Aviv earlier in the day by a Palestinian, the Hamas leader blamed the Israeli occupation.

He said if Israel wanted stability in the region, it should "stop its aggression and start to seriously think about leaving, and for the Palestinians to regain all their rights."

Read More

A thought experiment

Islam not only frowns upon images of Mohammed, but also images of Moses, Jesus and Mary.

After seeing the riots and burning buildings as a result of the relatively innocuous cartoons of Mohammed published in Denmark....

Imagine what would happen if the Louvre would be taken over by Muslims.

Read More

The insidious Zionist cartoon cartel

Take a few Danish cartoons. Simmer for five months.
Add generous heapings of Muslim paranoia, unconstrained Jew-hatred, and a smattering of European media trying to belatedly prove they have freedom of the press, and you get:

The Zionist conspiracy to insult Mohammed!

Damascus, (SANA) - Minister of Awqaf or religious Endowments urged the Danish government Thursday to deal with the issue of insulting Prophet Mohammed by Danish newspapers while the Danish ambassador called to open a new page via dialogue....“ This is to put an end to the Zionist lobby that damages ties among peoples … we note that Zionist hands that spread corruption among peoples and nations are behind such seditions,” the minister told the ambassador.

And...

TEHRAN, Feb. 3 (MNA) -- The insulting caricatures of Prophet Mohammad (peace be upon him and his household) published by the Danish daily Jyllands-Posten, the Norwegian periodical Magazinet, and the German daily Die Welt have the potential to create a dangerous rift between Islam and the West.

Although the Western media have often insulted Islamic sanctities -- an obvious example is the book “The Satanic Verses” by Salman Rushdie – these publications’ recent insults of the prophet of Islam are a new development that had not occurred before.

The simultaneous measures definitely were not an accident. Rather, they are part of a comprehensive plan to confront Islam.

A careful analysis of similar events around the world over the past five years reveals that the U.S. neoconservatives and the Zionist lobby have formulated a plot to influence public opinion in the West so as to foster animosity between Islam and Christianity.

Meanwhile, in Lebanon...

Vice-President of the Higher Islamic Shiite Council Sheikh Abdel-Amir Qabalan has demanded that the journalist responsible for publishing the 12 caricatures in the Danish daily Jyllands-Posten be put on trial.

Qabalan was speaking on Friday following a meeting with Danish Ambassador to Syria and Jordan Ole Egberg Mikkelsen who conveyed to the Shiite cleric a letter from Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen that included an apology for the insult made to Prophet Mohammad and Islam.

Qabalan said: "I believe that the person responsible for the caricatures is a Jew or Zionist, because such an insult is the work of a Zionist."

Yup, as always, it is the Jews pulling the strings behind the worldwide conspiracy to insult Islam.

Many Muslims are calling for a boycott of Western goods altogether because of this kerfuffle.

Also interestingly is the reaction of so-called "moderate" Muslims. MSNBC notes:

Aside from the large demonstrations today, what sort of reaction did you hear from more moderate Palestinians?
Surprising anger. We spoke today to Dr. Asad Abu Sharak, a professor of linguistics at Al Azhar University in Gaza. He is considered to be a moderate and belongs to a group that sponsors an interfaith dialog with Christian and Jews, called Sabel.

Sharak said that he believes that this is part of a conspiracy against the Muslim community and “this is a premeditated campaign against the Muslims on the part of the West.”

He says that the publication of these cartoons is causing “a clash of civilizations that it will widen the gap of misunderstanding between the West and the East.”

He said he believed that this was an example of a double standard, that when someone denigrates the Holocaust they throw them in jail. But when someone denigrates the religious figure that Muslims hold most dear, they call it freedom of speech. He believes that the publication of the cartoons is actually a “premeditated crime” against Muslims and that “those people who published those cartoons should be brought to court.”

And this is coming from someone who is considered to be very moderate, but this was his attitude. Sharak lived in Ireland eight years and lived and taught at the University of Michigan for a year.

He doesn’t see this as an isolated incident, but rather as a campaign against Islam, and he was very vehement about that.

The only conclusion one can reach is that when "moderate" Muslims want dialogue with others, it is only to push their agenda, but not to listen to a word that the other side may have to say. For someone to live in the West for a decade and not understand the basics of freedom of speech means that he was not listening.

The hypocrisy is stunning. The freedoms that they are demanding only apply to them and not to any non-Muslim. The day that a Muslim stands up and says that Arab newspapers should not publish anti-semitic cartoons is the day that he has some legitimacy complaining about the (mostly innocuous) cartoons published in Denmark.

Read More

Iranian police: Israel smuggling liquor into Iran

Those crafty Joooooz!

Tehran, Feb 1 - Iranian police announced on Tuesday that Israel is behind the smuggling of liquors into Iran.

"Foot print of Israeli companies and affiliated security organizations is seen in the smuggling of liquors to Iran," said local police commander Colonel Hossein Abdi in an interview with IRNA here on Tuesday.

Abdi said that Israeli companies, backed fully by the smugglers, transit liquors to Iraq via Ibrahim Khalil border and from there to Iran.

He said that Israeli security organizations are in efforts to spread flagrancy and corruption among young generation to harm the Islamic establishment.

He added that the facilities of the companies have been put at the disposal of the smugglers to motivate them to be active in the business.

To support his claim, Abdi said that the detained smugglers have confessed that the companies selling the liquors inside Iraqi territory receive the consignment when it is delivered safely to the destination.

He said since the start of the current Iranian year on March 21, 2005, more than 210 bottles and cans of liquors have been confiscated from smugglers in Mahabad.

So over 11 months, they confiscated about five cans of beer a week.

But I think that they are onto something. The morality of the Persian people is way too high (blowing up millions of Jews - good, having a woman drive a car - bad) and the Zionists need to tempt them with Western vices. It is time for the Elders to work on an initiative to spread flagrancy and corruption.

It should be called the Immorality to Really Anger Nutcases initiative.

A few bottles of booze is just the beginning. Immorality takes many forms, and poisoning the pure minds of Persians is a worthy goal.

IRAN will use the global resources of the Zionists to undermine Iranian morality. The best way to do this is to disguise it as an anti-Zionist message, making it easy to infiltrate past the borders of the holy Islamic Republic.

First, we will publish pamphlets that show just how degraded and immoral the Zionist West has become. This pamphlet will be liberally illustrated with examples, such as the scandalous attire worn on the red carpet of the Oscars. Chapter 8 will be titled "Very Immoral Content! Do Not Read Unless You Are Pure of Mind!" and will include soft core porn, Budweiser ads and Mohammed cartoons.

Videos wil also have to be produced using our Hollywood connections. The storylines will be of a familiar theme: Hook-nosed cannibal rabbis stealing the eyes of Palestinian children, the normal Muslim prime-time fare. But then the bearded rabbis will make a trip to the beach in Eilat to plan to jam Iranian air force radar and in the background will be topless European women frollicking in the surf. After 30 minutes of this scene, the rabbis will join them to play volleyball. These videos will play on the Zionist Al-Jazeerah network.

In order to stop Iranian intelligence to find out about these plans, pictures of female ankles should be placed in strategic places of the written instructions. The pure Persians will be forced to avert their eyes and we can continue our nefarious plans to contaminate and ultimately dominate the Islamic world.

Read More