Host: Do you agree today that we should invest in this—for instance, by creating tourism for these holy places where visitors can come?
AAR: Every day, discussing this topic creates controversy because people will ask, "How can you talk about Jews [owning/visiting property] today?" But we have to admit—both you as a media professional and I as an archaeology expert—that accepting to discuss such a sensitive topic takes a high level of boldness. It requires careful phrasing. When I am asked about this, we must differentiate between Judaism (Jews) and Zionism.
Host: Sure, absolutely.
AAR: But practically speaking, we cannot easily make that distinction. As an archaeology expert, a human being, and a presenter, do you agree that these properties belong to Jews and that they should repossess them? In my opinion, I do not agree.
Host: You don't agree?
AAR: I do not agree. Because I do not trust—there are around 13,000 real estate properties—I do not trust them. Can we really separate people from the Zionist entity, which I call a destructive, terrorist movement against humanity and culture? We cannot separate them. They are tied to it, and according to their narratives, they have a promised land. Their religion is tied to their state (Israel), even if they live outside it.
Host: Indeed.
AAR: I have even heard suggestions not only about reclaiming their old buildings and land, but asking: "Why don't we allow them to buy new properties?" How could we allow them to buy land and risk turning Baghdad or Iraq into a second Palestine? Their projects and plans are extremely dangerous.
Host : You mentioned a very important point—asking how Baghdad could be turned into a second Palestine. Do you believe Jews are planning for that today?
AAR: Yes, they are planning for that using attractive concepts: brotherhood, peace, accepting the other, the Abrahamic Faith, and integration. Look at how broad and dangerous these concepts are—presented under shiny, beautiful covers, but dangerous to the extreme.