The Palestine Liberation Organization has decided to wind up its Negotiations Support Unit after damaging leaks about the concessions it was prepared to make to Israel, an official told AFP on Monday.The leaked papers reveal how exactly the NSU was trying to manipulate world opinion and influence the US towards their position and against Israel.
The decision by the PLO Executive Committee will take effect next month, the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
Committee member Ahmad Majdalani told AFP that the unit would be restructured and placed under the direct supervision of Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas.
Formed in 1999 to provide technical assistance to the Palestinian negotiating team, the unit had received funding from a number of European governments, particularly Britain and the Scandinavian countries.
Is it appropriate for European countries to fund a group whose entire purpose is to go against Israel in negotiations? Would they have funded an Israeli negotiations unit? Why is it not considered a conflict of interest when some members of the Quartet are openly supporting one side in negotiations?
Furthermore, are these countries reviewing the papers to see if their money was spent appropriately?
When the PLO, through the NSU, says that there is no such thing as a Jewish people - does that reflect the intent of the Scandinavian and British funders of the NSU?
There are a lot of issues that the leaks bring up, and these issues are being ignored by the media.