Sunday, September 22, 2024

  • Sunday, September 22, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
This is a guest post whose author wishes to remain anonymous - and the reason says volumes. - EoZ


Calling All Jewish Democrats: It’s An Emergency

 Why I have requested anonymity for this piece:

In my place of work there is intense hostility to Israel. If I openly argued what I am about to argue, that anyone who cares about Israel cannot support the Democratic candidate for President and must seriously consider supporting the other candidate, the one they all hate, my professional status would be seriously compromised. To borrow the point made by another recent essay, that is why this essay both needs to be published, and to be anonymous. The situation is that dire.

 ======

 I am a lifelong Democrat.

 But I also support Israel and American Jewry.

 After October 7 the two are no longer compatible.

 There are many issues I care about, for which the Democratic Party has traditionally been the better vehicle; but the current existential emergency for Israel and American-Jewry means that that issue must now take priority. Though it hurts to say it, this lifelong Democrat cannot vote for the current Democratic candidate for President. I am not the first to reach this conclusion. There’s even now a whole organization called “Jexit,” for Jews exiting the Democratic Party. With great regret I realize I must now join them, for the following now strikes me as indisputable:

 Harris-Walz will be a disaster for Israel and for American Jewry.

 There have been some positive moments. Biden-Harris said the right things immediately after October 7, and allowed the U.S. Navy to be present in the region at a couple of important times, for which an Israel-advocate rightly feels gratitude. But aside from these and their occasional banal remark about believing in Israel’s right to defend itself—doesn’t every country have the right to defend itself?—heaps and mounds of evidence point unambiguously toward that dire conclusion. As I write, in September of 2024, Hamas leader Khaled Meshal is praising Biden-Harris for helping Hamas to remain in power, for always waiting patiently for and listening to Hamas’s demands in negotiations and for pressuring Israel to submit, and for recognizing Hamas as a legitimate diplomatic partner. What Meshal is gushing over is not the behavior of an ally of Israel, but of an administration that has largely taken the side of Israel’s enemies.

 Since Harris has so far given no indication that her relevant policies will differ from Biden’s, and also repeatedly expressed her support for Biden’s, we may treat the Biden-Harris record as an indication of her own tendencies. If anything, in fact, the evidence suggests that Harris’s policies and actions will be worse. In September of 2024 here is Harris gloating about withholding weapons from Israel in order to put leverage on Israel to “accept the deal”: the deal, that is, that does not return all the hostages, that leaves Hamas in power, and forces Israel to withdraw in defeat. That is not the behavior of an ally, again, but of a friend of the enemy.

 But that is just the tip of the iceberg.

 Iran

 (1)

Biden-Harris supported the disastrous JCPOA treaty with Iran, have continued to make efforts to reestablish it, and Harris states that she will rejoin it if elected. That treaty enriched the Islamic Republic with hundreds of billions of dollars, enabling it to fund its proxies Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis, and to fund its “Ring of Fire” surrounding Israel (including jihadi groups in Syria, Iraq, the West Bank, and Yemen). Biden-Harris funding is thus directly responsible for the seven-front war currently be waged against Israel. That treaty and the Biden-Harris administration have also failed to adequately monitor and prevent the regime’s uranium enrichment. Iran is now perilously close to the nuclear weapon they have repeatedly proclaimed they will use to destroy the Jewish state and murder its seven million Jews.

 (2)

Biden-Harris continued to waive the sanctions on Iran even after October 7, and even after Iran directly fired upwards of 300 missiles at Israeli homes. They are renewing these waivers many months into a war where now over 20,000 Iranian-funded missiles have been fired at Israel. Just this week the Senate Foreign Relations Committee sent an angry letter to the Biden administration for violating federal law by not enforcing Congress-mandated sanctions. And it’s not just about waiving sanctions. Just recently it was reported that the Biden-Harris administration has been working around internal sanctions on Iran in order to produce a trade increase of 43% with Iran this past year—after October 7. Biden-Harris appear to be doing everything in their power to flood Iran with the cash that funds its goal of destroying Israel. Harris’s running mate Walz also endorses JCPOA and supports waiving sanctions.

 (3)

Harris has close ties with many members of and has received a top 100% rating from the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), the pro-Khamenei lobby that advances the Islamic Republic’s interests in Washington D.C. NIAC was founded by rabid antisemite Trita Parsi. The rating is no surprise, given Harris’s record above of supporting the Iranian regime and its global campaign of terror. This alone should dissuade anyone who cares about Israel and Jews from voting for her: Harris got the top rating from the lobby group that represents the greatest enemy of Israel and the Jewish people, the enemy that funded and orchestrated the October 7 massacre and the year of war since. Running mate Walz also received a top NIAC rating.

 Funding Palestinian Violence

 (4)

Biden-Harris reinstated funding to the Palestinian Authority (P.A.), which supports its “pay-to-slay” program, thus incentivizing Palestinians to murder Jews. Numerous terrorist attacks, including and after October 7, and including those against American citizens, are thus rewarded with the American taxpayer money. They continue to fund the P.A. despite its regularly failing to meet State Department requirements for fiscal transparency, which helps the P.A. keep “pay-to-slay” going. Biden-Harris also continue to fund the P.A. in direct violation of the Taylor Force Act, which prohibits it precisely due to “pay-to-slay.” There seems to be no federal law they are unwilling to break to keep the cash flowing to the declared enemies of Israel. 

 Biden-Harris also reinstated funding to UNRWA, thus providing a direct funding line to Hamas—which, the current war has revealed, has entirely infiltrated UNRWA. Many Hamas (and Islamic Jihad) members are employees of UNRWA and at least 19 UNRWA employees were active participants in the October 7 massacre, all while their salaries are paid by Biden-Harris. None of this is a secret. The P.A.’s “pay-to-slay” program is highly publicized, as is the UNRWA-Hamas link. But Biden-Harris keep pouring the money in.

 The Israel-Hamas War

 (5)

Biden-Harris have shown far more concern for Palestinian civilians than for Israeli civilians,

at one point even dictating to Israel (through their Secretary of State) that Israel’s “Job Number One” in fighting Hamas had to be protecting and aiding Palestinian civilians. One doesn’t even know where to start with that remark. It is not addressed to Hamas, the governing authority in Gaza that is (a) responsible both for the war in the first place, (b) is responsible, in refusing to return hostages, for the war’s continuation, and (c) is actually responsible for the welfare of Gazan civilians. Instead this disrespectful and condescending remark is addressed to the supposed ally of the U.S., and is simply absurd in suggesting that Israel should (a) have more concern for enemy civilians than in protecting its own civilians, which is its reason for waging war, and (b) more concern for enemy civilians than their actual governing power has for those civilians. The remark is also both ignorant and offensive, implying that Israel is not already doing more than any modern army in attempting to minimize civilian casualties, and doing so in nearly impossible conditions. And it expresses such profound incompetence that should be disqualifying in a commander-in-chief, as it amounts to open support for Hamas’s use of human shields: Israel cannot go after Hamas if, as Hamas openly does, they hide behind civilians. Needless to say that would be a disastrous policy for any democracy engaged with a terrorist group. With such remarks Biden-Harris seem to be doing everything they can to restrict Israel’s ability to wage this existential war.

 (6)

Speaking of incompetence, Biden-Harris have bent over backwards to provide massive amounts of “humanitarian aid” to Gaza. That on its own isn’t necessarily objectionable, but the execution has been both laughable and directly harmful. Start with the expensive boondoggle pier that wasted hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars and the lives of several soldiers defending it in order to deliver essentially nothing before being dismantled; that alone should have had those supporting the policy fired, including the policy-makers-in-chief. But the relentless insistence that Israel facilitate aid, the prioritizing of aid over essential war efforts and aims, has produced an even greater disaster. From the start of the war it has been widely publicized that Hamas steals the aid that Biden-Harris compel Israel to facilitate. Yet Biden-Harris continued anyway to insist that Israel facilitate the aid, and in so doing have created a situation where, eleven months into the war, Hamas has not only has earned some half billion dollars from selling the stolen aid to Gazans, but is now sitting on enormous stockpiles of supplies, literally “overflowing warehouses,” allowing it to entrench itself indefinitely in the tunnels. This is worse than incompetence. Funding Iran (above) was bad enough, but this amounts to directly funding the Hamas war effort and thus perpetuating the war on behalf of Hamas. Biden-Harris behavior here is literally indistinguishable from that of a party openly supporting Hamas over Israel in the war.

 (7)

The relentless insistence that Israel focus on facilitating aid is only one of many ways in which Biden-Harris have consistently hampered Israel’s war effort. For only one particularly heinous example, they demanded that Israel not enter Rafah, causing a months-long delay in that essential operation. Biden threatened Israel with withholding weapons if they went in; Kamala “I’ve studied the maps” Harris condescendingly reproached Israel even for thinking about Rafah, claiming the operation was impossible and warning Israel about crossing her “red line.” She said, “We have been clear in multiple conversations and in every way that any major military operation in Rafah would be a huge mistake … I have studied the maps. There’s nowhere for those folks to go.” For several months Israel complied, the delay not only extending the war by months but likely leading to the deaths of multiple hostages. Harris in particular was then made to look like an incompetent fool when Israel managed to evacuate a million people from Rafah in just over a week and take control of the strategically essential Philadelphi corridor in just days. She has yet to acknowledge her error but instead continues to threaten to withhold weapons from Israel. Just this week she reiterated yet again that she supports withholding weapons from Israel as leverage over Israel, implying that she would emphasize that strategy if elected.

 It’s not just the incompetence of the current and potential future commander-in-chief that matters here. It’s the policy they repeatedly emphasize: they didn’t merely threaten to withhold weapons, they acted on it, and continue to. This stunning fact must be repeated: Biden-Harris withheld weapons for many months, that is, withheld weapons from its alleged ally while that ally is engaged in an existential war with a radical Islamist terrorist group.

 That behavior is indistinguishable from that of a party supporting Hamas over Israel in the war.

 (8)

Biden-Harris both regularly parrot Hamas talking points, including citing Hamas’s alleged numbers of casualties, repeatedly suggesting “far too many innocent civilians have died”—even after numerous analysts have demonstrated that Hamas’s numbers are simply not credible (just one example here), and despite it being notably striking that Hamas does not bother distinguishing civilians from combatants so there is literally no way to know how many “innocent civilians” have died. They just take the terrorists’ word for it, treating those who perpetrate barbaric massacres as credible sources. The Biden-Harris comments are also deeply offensive, given that the Israel Defense Force (IDF) is achieving perhaps the lowest civilian:militant casualty record in modern warfare and doing so in the most adverse conditions possible (urban warfare, tunnels, an enemy who deliberately uses human shields etc). Nor have Biden-Harris been able to spare a single word of praise for the IDF’s professional concern to minimize civilian casualties, just the repeated condemnations. These comments are again designed to hamper Israel’s war effort, to raise the bar so high against military operations (“not a single civilian may die”) that they become impossible, and doing so by applying to Israel alone a standard no one applies to any other military conflict elsewhere. The best Harris can offer is the banal “Israel has the right to defend itself” which is then instantly followed by “but it matters how they do so,” followed by the criticisms above—all of which amounts to preventing Israel from defending itself, exactly as an ally of Hamas and enemy of Israel would do.

 (9)

Throughout the war Biden-Harris have pressured Israel not only to negotiate with the terrorist group responsible for October 7 but to make massive concessions to them. They have pressured Israel to accept defeat from Hamas, in other words, by withdrawing from Gaza without all the hostages and without removing Hamas from power, which is a sure guarantee that Hamas will rearm and rebuild (not least by stealing international aid) and do October 7 again and again—as they have openly said they plan to do. They have put absolutely no pressure on Hamas to surrender, which was in their power to do—for example by their leverage over Hamas allies Qatar (which funds and lavishly hosts Hamas leaders to this day) and Egypt (which allowed Hamas to build its massive arsenal and tunnel system). To the contrary, not only do Biden-Harris-Qatar relations remain healthy and flourishing eleven months into the war against Israel that Qatar supports and partially funded, but Biden-Harris even just rewarded Egypt with hundreds of millions in aid despite Egypt’s (a) refusing to accept a single Gazan refugee, (b) demanding Israel vacate the essential Philadelphi corridor, and (c) operating the massive smuggling that made October 7 possible in the first place. Harris, when asked in an interview this week what she would do “differently” from Biden, answered by emphasizing the importance of applying leverage over Israel to capitulate. Leverage over Israel, while lavishly rewarding the parties who openly support the enemy of Israel.

 Biden-Harris’s behavior here is indistinguishable from that of a Hamas ally and enemy of Israel.

 (10)

Harris snubbed Netanyahu’s speech on Congress. This came after months of repeated Biden-Harris interference in Israel’s own democracy, including outright efforts to unseat Israel’s democratically elected leader. Whether one is for or against Netanyahu as a politician, he is the elected leader of an alleged ally in the midst of an existential war; the lack of respect, and the lack of support for that alleged ally while it is engaged in an existential war, was a disgrace. The disgrace was only magnified by the simultaneous boycott of the speech by many Democratic members of congress, following Harris’s lead, which alone gives a strong indication of what her leadership will bring. When Harris did meet with Netanyahu individually she publicly reproached him (“We have a lot to talk about it,” she announced sternly) and spread unsubstantiated claims (i.e. libels) about mass starvation in Gaza.

 This is not the behavior of an ally

 The Two-State Delusion

 (11)

Biden-Harris repeatedly demand that those who committed the October 7 atrocities should be rewarded with a "state" of their own. Harris repeats this demand every single time the question arises, including in the debate with Trump and the handful of interviews she has given since. Not only does this demand reward the barbaric massacre and incentivize jihadi violence both against Israel and the West in general—why wouldn’t they perpetrate mass violence, when they get their demands met by doing so?—but she constantly repeats the demand despite the fact that Hamas leaders repeatedly, openly, proclaim their intention to perpetrate October 7 again and again and again, until all the Jews are murdered. Let that point sink in: Hamas openly proclaims their desire to murder as many Jews as possible, and Harris then insists on giving them a state—the land, the resources—to empower them toward achieving that genocidal ambition. Note that she insists on this while also forcefully pressuring Israel to accept a ceasefire “deal” that leaves Hamas in power, and thus in the position of continuing its jihad against Israel and Jews. Nor can you imagine that somehow Hamas won’t be in charge of the future Palestinian state that Harris is working hard to produce. Hamas’s October 7 operation enjoyed massive support from the Palestinian population, even many months into the war, and nearly a year into the war Hamas remains the most popular party among Palestinians. Hamas conquered Gaza from the P.A. back in 2007 in a matter of days, and will easily overrun any future Palestinian state within days as well, particularly with the support of Harris who insists that they emerge undefeated from the war. So put that all together: Hamas aims to destroy Israel and murder all its Jews, undertakes October 7 as a step in that direction, and Harris responds by (a) working to keep them in power and (b) to give them a state, land, and resources, in order to advance their genocidal campaign against the Jews.

 This behavior is indistinguishable from that of a direct Hamas ally and declared enemy of Israel.

 Bias Against Israelis

 (12)

Biden-Harris repeatedly denounce Israelis in Judea-Samaria for defending themselves from Palestinian violence, and have repeatedly imposed sanctions on numerous Israelis there while literally doing nothing about the far more serious and more frequent violence of Palestinians against Israelis. The Biden-Harris sanctions go beyond those deplorable thugs who occasionally perpetrate unacceptable violence against Palestinian civilians; they are being applied broadly, to protesters within the Green Line, civic organizations, community leaders, security forces, and even those who tried to provide relief to those sanctioned. They amount to a determined battle against Israel to restrain Israel from exercising its sovereignty, being perpetrated against Israel while Israel is engaged in an existential war. At the same time as they work to hamper Israel,  Biden-Harris are, per above, (a) funding the P.A. that pays Palestinians to attack Israelis, (b) funding Hamas through UNRWA and supplying it through aid in order to maintain its war against Israel, (c) waiving sanctions on Iran which funds and supplies Palestinian violence against Israelis in the West Bank as well, then (d) ignoring that Palestinian violence against Israelis that results.

 This behavior is indistinguishable from that of an ally of the Palestinians and their war against Israel, and of an enemy of Israel.

 Lawfare Against Israel

 (13)

Beyond some lip service denouncements, Biden-Harris have done nothing serious or substantial to support or defend Israel from the international lawfare being waged against it from the United Nations (U.N.), the International Criminal Court (ICC), and the International Court of Justice (ICJ). For just one example, they simply allowed the ICC to move forward toward the mass arrest of Israeli Jews, starting with the Jewish state’s political leaders and soldiers, and the subsequent crippling of the Israeli economy. (In contrast, when the ICC attacked the U.S. in the past, the U.S. responded with crippling sanctions against the members of the court, and the court backed off.) Just this week Israel, frustrated with the Biden-Harris inactivity, initiated its own legal activity at the ICC. Biden-Harris shockingly allowed a U.N. Security Council resolution to pass demanding an “immediate ceasefire” in Gaza while leaving Hamas rin power and still holding 130 hostages, thus empowering the terrorist group committed to Israel’s destruction. (Why should it negotiate and concede anything if the U.N., with U.S. support, will force Israel to withdraw?) Biden-Harris then offered no substantial resistance to the U.N.—whose budget depends heavily on U.S. contributions—for “seating” the alleged state of “Palestine” in the General Assembly, and took no public actions to prevent “Palestine” from submitting its anti-Israel resolution that just produced the General Assembly calling for Israel to be unilaterally removed from Judea/Samaria, to be removed from the Old City of Jerusalem, for sanctions on Israeli officials, and an arms embargo preventing Israel from defending itself. The U.S. did at least vote against the resolution, and it’s true that the U.S. Representative to the U.N. released a statement criticizing the resolution—though one that went on at length condemning Israeli “settlements” in Judea-Samaria and affirming its general support for the ICJ despite is reprehensible behavior toward Israel. I’m unable to find either Biden or Harris bothering themselves to comment on the resolution afterward. In contrast, 30 Republican Senators publicly and unambiguously denounced that resolution—joined by zero Democrats, apparently following the silence of their Biden-Harris Democrats-in-chief. Meanwhile Biden-Harris continue to fund the P.A., whose budget also depends on those contributions, even as the P.A. initiates these extreme unilateral measures against Israel—measures proscribed, by the way, by the same Oslo Accords that the U.S. signed as a guarantor.

 In other words: In addition to violating various laws (per above), Biden-Harris are violating U.S. international legal commitments in order to support the actions of the declared enemy of Israel.

 Other Anti-Israel Foreign Policy

 (14)

(a) One of the very first Biden-Harris foreign policy decisions was to remove the Iran-funded Houthis from the list of designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations. They have continued to resist relisting them as recently as this week, despite numerous calls by others to do so, despite the Houthis’ ongoing attacks on Red Sea shipping and their repeatedly attacking Israel. Here, again, their behavior is indistinguishable from that of an enemy of Israel.

 (b) In 2022 Biden-Harris envoy Amos Hochstein was sent to negotiate a deal for (i.e. pressure) Israel to surrender 100% of its claim to Eastern Mediterranean gas fields to Lebanon and thus Hezbollah. That one-sided deal, much to Israel’s detriment, was sold to Israel by claiming that it would bring peace, by mollifying Hezbollah—which has now used the profits from that gas to fund and fire at least 9000 rockets at Israel over the course of eleven months. In recent weeks Hochstein was back trying to force a deal in which Israel gives up more land to Hezbollah, to mollify them, because the first deal clearly worked so well. Biden-Harris are either unable to understand that any resources given to an Islamist jihadi enemy of Israel will only be used to advance their genocidal campaign against Israel, or they actively support that jihadi campaign.

 (c) The disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan—Harris proudly notes she was the “last person in the room”—not only consigned Afghani women to their painfully subservient fate but emboldened all of the United States’ enemies who recognized that they had nothing to fear from the U.S. for their aggression: Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, China’s belligerency toward Taiwan, and Iran-Hamas’s invasion of Israel. Biden-Harris’s behavior is indistinguishable from that of an enemy of Israel.

 Support for Campus Jew-Haters

 (15)

Many campus enemies of Israel and of the Jews responded to October 7 by celebrating, endorsing, and calling for more mass genocidal violence against Jews, demanding the destruction of Israel, and then spent eleven months ostracizing, harassing, and in dozens of instances physically assaulting Jewish students on our campuses. Harris has repeatedly expressed support for these people; “They’re showing exactly what the emotions should be” was only her most recent example. One might have thought that the appropriate emotions in response to an attempted genocide would be something other than celebrating it and calling for more. Meanwhile Harris has said essentially not a word in support of the Jewish students who have confronted a year of terror and record-setting antisemitism on their campuses. In one of her first speeches as presumptive presidential nominee, instead, Harris slammed Donald Trump for promising to deport foreign students who engage in pro-Hamas protests and terrify Jewish students; in so doing she described harassing Jewish students and defending and celebrating a U.S.-proscribed terrorist organization as “free speech.”

 It's true that in May of 2024 Biden-Harris did eventually unveil their “National Strategy to Combat Antisemitism.” This was about as useless a program against antisemitism as could be expected from policymakers who think glee at the genocide of Jews is the “right emotion.” That utter incompetence can no better be displayed than by their appointing the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), an antisemitic, Hamas-affiliated hate group, to be one of its partner organizations in combating antisemitism. As I write, CAIR is busy protesting against a proposed Los Angeles city ordinance that would protect houses of worship from rioting mobs because they support the pro-Hamas mobs who have been attacking synagogues, and suing the University of Maryland for the right of pro-Hamas students to co-opt the painful date of October 7 itself for a mass campus celebration of the Hamas massacre. Either Biden-Harris are utterly clueless to the nature of CAIR, or, more sinisterly, they deliberately included CAIR on the list knowing that would necessarily dilute the battle against antisemitism. Massive incompetence or sinister anti-Jewishness? Unfortunately, given their intimate familiarity with anti-Israel activists (see the section on personnel below), and given their consistent tendency to side with the enemies of Israel in items (1)-(14) above, I can no longer insist on the mere incompetence.

 That Harris-Walz will continue the unhappy tradition, and worse, is quite clear. In a recent speech Walz, after giving the requisite “October 7 was bad” disclaimer, blamed Netanyahu for all the problems, entirely ignored Hamas’s responsibility for the ongoing war, praised the pro-genocide-of-the-Jews protesters, and insisted on the immediate creation of a Palestinian state (i.e. reward for October 7, see above): “I think those folks who are speaking out loudly in Michigan are speaking out for all the right reasons,” he said. The folks, that is, openly supporting the genocidal agenda of Hamas.

 (16)

The Biden-Harris Justice Department has been entirely missing in action this past year. It has not only ignored the widely reported mass wave of antisemitism occurring on campuses and in many major cities (including vandalism, incitement to mass murder, violence, and more), but has actively ignored requests that they get involved. There are many actions they could take, or could have taken, that they have simply chosen not to, as described here: invoke the Ku Klux Klan act against pro-Hamas activists blockading public spaces, invoke the FACE act against them attacking Hillels and synagogues, prosecute the threats of violence and actual physical assaults directed at Jewish students, investigate the flow of money to pro-Hamas campus groups from foreign entities and terrorist groups, investigate and prosecute the undeclared funds that countries such as Hamas ally Qatar have contributed to universities, and more. At the same time Democratic District Attorneys have been notoriously lax in prosecuting the crimes perpetrated by pro-Hamas protestors on campuses and in city streets, including promptly dismissing charges against numerous violators. Stunningly, Biden-Harris Attorney General Garland just issued an opinion that UNRWA, whose members participated in the October 7 massacre, should be immune to prosecution, aiming to protect that Hamas-ridden organization from being sued! The message this behavior sends is clear: It’s open season on Jews, you can harass, assault, vandalize Jews and Jewish institutions, and the Biden-Harris admin will stand down.

 It’s more than just that “The Golden Age of American Jews is Ending and that we are witnessing “The Vanishing: The Erasure of Jews From American Life”:  American Jews are being removed from leadership and public positions, withdrawing from the public square, hunkering down into ghettos and making plans to get out. Biden-Harris policies in fact are a direct threat to the future of American Jewry. And Harris-Walz will only be worse: a recent report suggests that Keith Ellison—Israel-hating, antisemitic Farrakhan-devotee, current Walz-supported Attorney General of Minnesota—is on Harris’ shortlist to become the Attorney General of the United States.

 Miscellaneous

 (17) The Biden-Harris administration, through its National Security Council, recently hosted the leader of a group with a track record of collaborating in Gaza with Hamas officials. That meeting was of a piece with its extensive courting and platforming of various anti-Israel activists, as part of its ongoing campaign strategy: Biden-Harris, and now Harris-Walz, actively seek the votes of the most Israel-hating members of its demographic, in particular in the swing state of Michigan. Harris herself secretly met with the openly pro-Hamas mayor of Dearborn, MI. If these were one-offs they could perhaps be forgiven; politicians also have to meet with people they disagree with or even dislike, and sometimes even court their votes. But not only is the widescale pattern of such meetings clear, the Biden-Harris administration in fact has met over 60 times with a rabidly anti-Israel, Boycott-Divestment-Sanctions(BDS)-supporting group. The evidence is clear: the Harris-Walz administration will keep the door wide open for even the most Israel-hating constituents and parties.

 (18) A few things collected together.

(a) As a Senator Harris voted against anti-BDS Legislation and aid to Israel. In 2019 she joined Israel-hater Bernie Sanders in voting against the Strengthening America’s Security in the Middle East Act (S.1). The bill pledged security assistance to Israel and clarified that state and local governments have the right to counter boycotts of Israel.

 (b) Harris has defended Rep. Ilhan Omar’s antisemitism. When Omar tweeted that support for Israel was “all about the Benjamins,” for example, Harris rushed to her defense and insisted anti-Zionism is not antisemitism, saying, “Like some of my colleagues in the Congressional Black Caucus, I am concerned that the spotlight being put on Congresswoman Omar may put her at risk… I also believe there is a difference between criticism of policy or political leaders, and anti-Semitism.”

 (c) Harris downplays the threat, and even existence, of radical Islamic terrorism. For example, she insisted that we should have the courage to not use the term “radical Islamic terrorism.”

 (d) Harris enjoys the endorsement of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Bernie Sanders, Mehdi Hasan, numerous celebrities, and countless others among the leading public antisemites and Israel-haters. Perhaps that is not unrelated to her policy of leaving her door wide open for meetings with that demographic. But how could a supporter of Jews and Israel vote for the person endorsed by all the haters of Jews and Israel?

 (e) Harris’s pastor, Amos Brown, has a history of radical, anti-American statements as well as antisemitic political alliances, including serving as a delegate at the notoriously antisemitic 2001 Durban Conference that launched the modern Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions campaign against Israel; Harris says of him that he is “an inspiration to me always,” that he has been “on this journey with me every step of the way, from when I first thought about running for public office almost two decades ago,” and she has invited him multiple times to the White House.

 (19)

As for her immediate family, her step-daughter, Ella Emhoff, raised over eight million dollars for Hamas-affiliated UNRWA after revelations of its direct involvement with Hamas were published. Harris is obviously not responsible for her adult step-daughter but this is the company she keeps, and this who she has regular dinner conversations with. Ella Emhoff also disavows her Jewish identity, which again is her business but also puts all the sweet talk about Doug Emhoff being “First Mensch,” and his stories about brisket and plastic-covered couches in Brooklyn, into perspective. Jews have no reason to be comforted by this Jew being First Gentleman. Speaking of Doug Emhoff, his law firm represented avowed Israel-enemies Qatar and the PLO, suggesting where their sympathies may lay. Though Harris’s family is her business, surely these very public activities reveal a little bit about the world she inhabits.

 The Personnel

 They say “personnel is policy”; given the glimpse of policy in the many points above, one can only recoil in horror as one contemplates what is yet to come from the current, and likely future, personnel of a Harris-Walz administration. The personnel issue is only that much more pressing given that Harris is not exactly considered a policy wonk; the influence the following people might therefore have in formulating and executing policy could be simply enormous.

 As one article title puts it, “Harris would fill her administration with anti-Israel radicals”—and supporters of Iran, the greatest enemy of Israel and of Jews on the planet.

 (1)

Harris’s Arab-American outreach coordinator, Brenda Abdelall, once complained that “The Zionists have a strong voice in American politics... I would say they’re controlling a lot of it,” and further complained that the defeat of a particular congressman “shows the Jewish influence in politics.” Needless to say, the trope of Jewish control of governments and politics is a classic antisemitic one.

 (2)

Harris’s Muslim outreach coordinator, Nasrina Bargzie, is an Afghan Muslim immigrant who was interviewed by the FBI after 9/11. They were interested in her because of “troubling comments” she made to friends, who reported her to the FBI. She has active ties to the pro-Hamas advocacy group CAIR and is directly linked to the main perpetrator of campus antisemitism and Israel-hatred, Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP). She allegedly used her power and influence to shut down Jewish students complaining about harassment in Berkeley by SJP.

 (3)

Perhaps Harris’s appointments to Arab and Muslim outreach might be expected to be unfriendly to Jews and Israel (though one might reflect on just why that must be, and what it portends when a very Arab-Muslim-friendly Harris starts appointing personnel across many departments: genocidal hatred toward Jews is apparently not disqualifying). But then there’s her general “faith outreach director,” i.e. Christian outreach coordinator: Jen Butler, another anti-Zionist, despite the fact that large swaths of the Christian community are quite pro-Israel. Butler is a staunch follower of prominent antisemite Linda Sarsour, and referred to Jesus as “a brown skin Palestinian Jew.” Was there really no other Christian available who might be a little friendlier to the Jews? The massive organization Christians United for Israel indicates that there is, so Harris’s choice here, regrettably, is clearly quite intentional.

 (4)

Well surely her director of Jewish outreach … Meet Ilan Goldenberg. Goldenberg currently serves as Harris’s Mideast advisor, and is likely to continue in that important position or something similar in her administration, while being recently appointed to Jewish outreach as well.  Goldenberg has a history of working with Iranian advocacy group NIAC lobbying for the interests of the Islamic Republic. His friends on Facebook include anti-Israel activists such as Khamenei agent Trita Parsi, Jeremy Ben-Ami, Ben Rhodes, Matt Duss, and Shadi Hamid, and he has retweeted noted antisemite Rep. Ilhan Omar. Goldenberg currently is responsible for crafting the extensive sanctions that the Biden-Harris Administration is imposing on Jewish Israelis (above), while simultaneously relieving sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran. There is hardly an anti-Israel position that Goldenberg does not endorse. He advocates for a divided Jerusalem, a return of pre-1967 borders, including dismantling every Jewish town in Judea and Samaria and the Golan Heights, and giving the terrorist-loving P.A. a state and international recognition. He opposes recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, opposes the Taylor Force Act (which ends economic aid to the P.A. as long as it maintains the “pay-for-slay” program), supports the Iran Deal, and wants to fund UNRWA, the Hamas front group.

 This is the person who will likely be formulating Harris’s Israel policy moving forward—or should we say “Anti-Israel policy” (or “pro-Iran” policy)—whom she also thinks is well suited to appeal to the Jewish community. With friends like these, they say, who needs enemies….

 Put differently: the Jews she aims to appeal to are the Jews who are opposed to Israel.

 (5)

Already mentioned above: Keith Ellison on the shortlist for Attorney General. Ellison’s antisemitism emerged when he became a contender for the top spot at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) in 2017. His ties with the Nation of Islam and its founder Louis Farrakhan were exposed, Farrakhan being about as extreme and explicit an antisemite as they come. In 2010, a recording of Ellison claiming that American foreign policy is “governed” by Israeli interests came out. His bid for DNC chair was perhaps undermined when reports emerged of his suggesting that “European white Jews are trying to oppress minorities all over the world.” This is the person likely to be in charge of the Harris Department of Justice, tasked with deciding whether to prosecute antisemitic Israel-hatred on college campuses and the mobs calling for the end of Israel on city streets and in front of synagogues. Ellison could not possibly do less for the Jewish community than the Biden-Harris Justice Department has done (per above), but, frighteningly, he could do worse: begin prosecuting Jewish students when they push back against the onslaught against them. Recently when a pro-Hamas activist charged and tackled from behind a pro-Israel activist peacefully standing and protesting in Newton, MA, the Democratic District Attorney chose to prosecute the pro-Israel activist for defending himself. A preview of what’s to come, across the land?

 (6)

Meet Maher Bitar. Bitar is already in place in the Biden-Harris administration: In 2021 he was appointed Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Intelligence Programs at the National Security Council—the same NSC that recently met with the pro-Hamas group (per above). In 2024 Bitar became, in the NSC, Deputy Assistant to the President and coordinator for intelligence and defense policy, the highest-ranking official coordinating U.S. policy in that area. His 2021 appointment was praised by Israel-hating Iran negotiator Rob Malley, currently under investigation for various malfeasance, and by the antisemitic Israel-hating American Task Force on Palestine. That tells you most of what you need to know about the man, who in that role is among the people briefing Biden on the Middle East on a regular basis, and perhaps tells you much about the Biden-Harris approach on all the matters outlined above. It will come as no surprise to learn that Bitar was a board member and leader of SJP at Georgetown University, a major proponent of the anti-Israel BDS movement who organized a BDS conference there, was pictured in a yearbook dancing in front of a banner demanding “Divest From Israeli Apartheid,” and even apparently spent some time working for the Hamas-front-group UNRWA.  Recall that SJP and the BDS movement are the same actors primarily responsible for the massive assaults on Jews on campus this past year. As I write Congressman Mike Lawler (R-NY) has written a letter to Biden-Harris expressing his concern that “Mr. Bitar’s resume features a distinct and decades long theme of controversial associations with antisemitic parties,” and depicts “an activist with a clear bias against and disregard for Israel, our closest ally and the only multicultural, multi-ethnic, multi-racial, and multi-religious democracy in the Middle East.”

 Bitar will almost surely at least retain his role in a Harris-Walz administration, or perhaps even be promoted to Director of National Intelligence. This is the man who is likely to have the ear, every morning, of a President Harris.

 (7) And front runner for National Security Advisor, or perhaps even Secretary of State? According to the Wall Street Journal, Harris is thinking of installing Phil Gordon, currently Harris’s National Security Advisor, as Secretary of State. Gordon is an ally of Iran-loving Ben Rhodes, has ties with numerous other pro-Iran individuals, did substantial work with the pro-Khameini lobby NIAC, has written numerous pro-Iran articles and even a book arguing for appeasement of the Iranian regime (that at the same time blames America for Muslim hatred), and is currently under congressional investigation about these ties and proclivities, including his participation in an Iranian operation to “expand Tehran’s soft power in the United States.” Senator Tom Cotton’s and Rep. Elise Stefanik’s concerns about him were addressed in a letter directly to Vice President Harris back in July, who appears unmoved. It’s no surprise that Gordon is a dedicated Israel-hater who has argued to reverse the move of the American Embassy to Jerusalem and to apply various sanctions to Israel.

 A Secretary of State who works to empower Iran, the great enemy of Israel and Jews, while disempowering Israel?

 Welcome to a Harris administration.

 So there you have it. Major people formulating policy, executing policy, communicating policy, are and will be avid, open haters of Israel. If Biden-Harris were bad for Israel and the Jews, Harris-Walz, with these folks on their roster, empowered and granted a mandate with an election win, will only be dramatically worse.

Conclusion

 As a lifelong Democrat, with the fate of Israel and American Jewry on the line, then, it is impossible for me to support this candidate. I find myself posting regularly on Twitter, in response to nearly every relevant news story about Biden-Harris-Walz policies and behavior: “Biden-Harris-Walz are and will be a DISASTER for Israel and for American Jews.” I find this conclusion literally indisputable, their occasional obligatory remark about “Israel has the right to defend itself” notwithstanding. I shudder when the phrase “ironclad commitment” occasionally pops in—because, given all the material above, it is nothing but a direct, open, bald-faced lie.

 Biden-Harris-Walz are and will be a disaster for Israel and for American Jews.

 As a lifelong Democrat it hurts me even more to admit that, this time around, given the prominence of the currently major issue for me, I believe I have to vote for the Orange Man.

 Much as there is to despise about him, much as I myself despise him, much as there is to dislike about the company he sometimes keeps and things that he sometimes says, much as I recognize that there are risks associated with his future presidency as well, and that he is nothing like a genuine panacea—when I cut through the noise, the personality, the character, and some of the behavior, when I focus just on the policy and the personnel, his is the administration that is far more likely to align with the issue that currently matters most to me, the future of Israel and of American Jews.

 It hurts to admit it, but Trump was perhaps the most pro-Israel President in American history, with a long list of actions supporting Israel.

 Just a few:

 (1) He recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and moved the U.S. embassy there, a feat in fact mandated by Congress but which decades of American presidents of both parties failed to do.

 (2) He shut down funding of Iran and thus support for its terrorist activities, for its proxies in Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and others. He imposed strict economic sanctions and had essentially stalled Iran's nuclear program due to lack of funds.

 (3) He shut down the funding of UNRWA, and thus direct U.S. funding of Hamas, funding that built the tunnels and the rockets and made the October 7 massacre possible.

 (4) He shut down the funding of the P.A., which was being used for “pay to slay.” He also removed Palestinian offices from Washington, D.C.

 (5) He withdrew the U.S. from the biased organs of the UN, such as the absurdly antisemitic UN Human Rights Council and UNESCO.

 (5) He aligned U.S. Central Command with Israel, fostering daily communications and overall military coordination with the IDF.

 (6) Most of all he brokered the Abraham Accords, the greatest advance toward Middle East peace since at least the Egypt-Israel accord, and perhaps providing a pathway to the only prospect of a just peace in the region.

 The conclusion is indisputable:

 Biden-Harris-Walz are and will be a disaster for Israel and for American Jews.

 Trump was the most Pro-Israel President ever.

 Nose held and deep breath taken, but:

 Orange Man it is.

 

 



Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Sunday, September 22, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
The Los Angeles Times coverage of the Israeli bombing of a group of Hezbollah leaders on Friday includes this telling detail:

Inside the Dahieh, the southern suburbs of the capital where Hezbollah is headquartered, it was a chaotic scene. Family members rushed to the area, but were kept away by Hezbollah operatives who erected a barricade around damaged buildings.
This isn't the police cordoning off a crime scene. It isn't health or authorities or civil engineers trying to keep people safe.

This is a terrorist group preventing families from visiting an building that was bombed.

No one even questions the right of Hezbollah to do whatever the hell it wants. 

The most ironic statements that come from Lebanese officials are where they complain that Israel is violating Lebanon's sovereignty. But Iran already controls all of Lebanon, sometimes tacitly and increasingly openly, through its proxy - and the Lebanese are too frightened to complain about that.

The photo accompanying the story was also interesting:


The terrorists were meeting in the basement. Israel bombed them - but the windows on the third floor of the building are not even broken. And the entire operation was planned and executed in only a few hours. 

No matter what the world says, no one takes more care to minimize civilian casualties in strikes on military targets in civilian areas than Israel does.





Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Sunday, September 22, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon


In yesterday's Torah portion, Rav Yosef Soloveitchik wrote decades ago that the words וַיָּרֵ֧עוּ אֹתָ֛נוּ הַמִּצְרִ֖ים, usually translated as "The Egyptians were evil to us", really should have used the word "לָנוּ" if that was its meaning. The word "אֹתָ֛נוּ" indicates that the translation should be "The Egyptians made us out to be evil," or in shorter terms, "The Egyptians demonized us." 

This is how antisemitism has been for thousands of years. Not only do the haters look down at Jews and treat them harshly, but they also ascribe the worst attributes to Jews. 

This hasn't changed. 

What has changed is that now Jews have the collective power to do something about this through the State of Israel.

Nothing Israel can do would make the world love us - that is very clear. The hate is not predicated on anything Israel does or doesn't do. It is absurd that so many believe, after millennia of irrational antisemitism, that suddenly the reasons given to hate Jews are suddenly rational. Their rationale for their Jew-hatred are excuses, not reasons. 

However, the events of the past week show that there is something that can be done. Not to make Israel's enemies love us, but to make them in awe of us.

Arthur C. Clarke famously formulated three laws about science, but they apply to Israel in other ways. The three laws are:
1. When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
2. The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.
3. Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
John Kerry said that it was literally impossible that any Arab states would make peace with Israel while there isn't a Palestinian state. He's one of many scientists" in the first law who have been consistently wrong about what Israel could or could not do. 

The first two laws correlate with a quote attributed to David Ben Gurion but that was around before him, "“The difficult we do immediately. The impossible takes a little longer.” Or to the joke:
God gathered a Jew, a Christian and a Muslim, and told them:
"I am tired of mankind's sins! In two weeks I'll unleash a great flood that will kill all humanity!"
The Christian said: "We have only two weeks to appease Him!"
The Muslim said: "-We have only two weeks to change our ways!"
The Jew said: "We have only two weeks to learn how to breathe underwater!"

 The third law is most relevant right now.

October 7 was not only a horrific massacre and the worst attack towards Jews since the Holocaust. It also made the Arab and Muslim worlds look at Israel as weak and attackable. It encouraged not only antisemitism but other attacks, from Hezbollah, the West Bank, Yemen and elsewhere. Arab media was filled with predictions and gleeful expectations that this was the beginning of the end of Israel.

They aren't laughing anymore.

To people in Hezbollah and Hamas and Iran, Israel is a supernatural jinn - it knows where they are, it knows what they say, it knows what they are thinking and are about to do. From all accounts, Israel even managed to get into Nasrallah's brain - to  convince him to abandon mobile phones and choose pagers instead, manufactured by a company he already trusted because they sold pagers to him two years earlier!

Israel not only discovered a top secret meeting of Hezbollah leaders in the sub-basement of a residential apartment building, but it managed to kill most of them while leaving most of the building intact. 

In Iran, Israel managed to plant a bomb under the bed of their top enemy in one of the most secure buildings in Tehran. 

Every terrorist, whether Iranian, Lebanese or Gazan, cannot even trust their closest comrades anymore. They cannot trust their communications devices. Nasrallah might be putting on a brave face, but the Hezbollah organization is now anything but organized. 

They might still hate Israel, but they are awed by it. They cannot make any decisions without worrying that those very decisions might be what Israel wants them to do, opening them up to doom. 

Meanwhile, despite the rhetoric, the larger Arab world is seeing that Israel is not only attacking terrorists with impunity, but they are targeting them to a degree that is simply unbelievable while minimizing civilian casualties. This is also magical. After ll, jinn can be good or evil - and an increasing number of Sunni Muslims are publicly mocking Hezbollah and tacitly cheering Israel. 

To a large degree, Israel has restored deterrence. Because you cannot fight magic. 






Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

Saturday, September 21, 2024

From Ian:

Seth Mandel: Israel’s Beirut Strike Was About Preventing Another October 7
Early in the war, Israeli TV personality Shlomi Eldar visited in Cairo with his friend and former senior Palestinian Authority official Sufyan Abu Zaydeh, who had lived in the Gaza Strip from 2019 until this year. If you had told him before October 7 what Hamas was hoping to accomplish, he told Eldar, “I would have answered like any Israeli intelligence officer: It’s inconceivable that this is what they’re planning.”

But it’s something that another Palestinian told Eldar that brings the full Hamas zealotry into sharp relief.

“Iyad” (an assumed name) and Eldar talk about the “last promise,” a kind of end-times prophecy that Hamas believed it was on the verge of bringing to fruition. Iyad tells Eldar a story: “One day, a well-known Hamas figure calls and tells me with pride and joy that they are preparing a full list of committee heads for the cantons that will be created in Palestine. He offers me the chairmanship of the Zarnuqa committee, where my family lived before 1948.”

That is Rehovot, in Israel. And Iyad was being offered the role, essentially, of military governor of the entire area for after Hamas defeated Israel and divided the entire country into such districts.

Sounds crazy, right? Iyad says he told them “You’re out of your minds” and asked the person not to call him again.

Hamas was serious, though. In 2021, the group held a gathering called “The Promise of the Hereafter Conference.” Three guesses what it was about.

That is the background of today’s strikes in Lebanon. There is no more talk of how crazy these guys are, as if their apocalyptic visions are mere punchlines. Of course Hezbollah has plans for similarly ambitious invasions of Israel. That doesn’t mean such an invasion is imminent, but neither can it be assumed as not imminent. October 7 changed the stakes. It was a humbling experience for the Israeli national-security agencies, but a learning one, too.

Of course, Ibrahim Aqil wasn’t targeted only for what he might do. Forty years ago he helped plan attacks on U.S. diplomatic compounds in Beirut. Since then, he has been a key player in the planning of Hezbollah attacks both inside and outside Lebanon. At the time of his death, he was also leading the group’s elite Radwan Force.

But the bigger-picture lesson here is that Israel will assume its enemies mean what they say. After October 7, it can’t afford not to.
Jonathan Tobin: Why the reactions to Israel’s strikes on Hezbollah matter
Israel can do nothing right
At the root of this the same belief in Israel’s illegitimacy as a “settler/colonialist” and “apartheid” state that motivates the mobs who have marched in the streets of American cities and on college campuses in support of Hamas’s efforts to purge Jews “from the river to the sea.”

To such people, there is nothing that Israelis could do to defend itself under any circumstance that would be justified. And, as they have also shown, there is nothing that those who wish to eradicate Israeli—even the genocidal Islamists of Hamas who perpetrated an orgy of mass murder, rape, torture, kidnapping and wanton destruction on Oct. 7—can do that can’t be characterized as an act of justified “resistance” against “settlers” and “white” oppressors.

Just as important as that is the way the attack on Israel’s efforts to stop Hezbollah tells us about the way many in the West have lost any belief that there is such a thing as a just war.

The immediate reaction to the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, reminded the overwhelming majority of Americans that there were times when you had to fight to defend yourself and your country. That was a matter of consensus among the generation that fought in World War II but had gone out of fashion in the Vietnam War era. Amid the quagmires in Iraq and Afghanistan that followed 9/11, it is once again being attacked by the left.

Some wars are just
That sense that there is nothing worth fighting or dying for has been compounded by the success of the left’s long march through our institutions in recent years as a generation of American students were indoctrinated in the toxic neo-Marxist myths about critical race theory and intersectionality. This is not just a war against America and its history but against Western civilization itself. By this means, many Americans have been intellectually disarmed against threats to their values and their nation. Along with it comes a belief that “white” Westerners are, like Israelis, inherently illegitimate and should not resist those who label themselves (as does Hezbollah) as members of a class of victims who seek to do them harm and topple their civilization.

Unnecessary and aggressive wars are unjust. But those waged to defend against murderous regimes and those who seek to victimize the powerless are just. Most of all, a war waged to defend a nation’s existence is fully defensible and should be supported by anyone with a set of moral values.

But many contemporary Western liberals have either forgotten that or have embraced anti-Western and Marxist ideology that would render even the most obviously moral wars, such as those waged against Hitler’s regime and the perpetrators of Oct. 7, as somehow immoral. In this way, they are prepared to condemn Israel’s exploding beepers that are clearly aimed at killing only terrorists as much as they do anything to prevent Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis in Yemen and their Iranian paymasters from continuing to inflict suffering on Israel and the West. In their worldview, the terrorists should be protected from attack, and their Israeli and Western victims deserve none.

The issue this week isn’t so much whether it’s OK to laugh at the predicament of terrorists who have had the tables turned on them. It’s whether it’s ever right for Israelis or any citizen of a Western country to defend themselves against murderers with blood on their hands, and who wish to create more mayhem and death. Ethical people understand that there is only one answer to that question. The anger directed at Israel is because they have once again shown that they are prepared to try to make the killers pay for their crimes.
IDF confirms assassination of Ibrahim Aqil, names 15 Hezbollah commanders killed in strike
Israel Air Force jets, guided by the Intelligence Directorate, killed Ibrahim Aqil, in addition to 15 other Hezbollah Radwan Force commanders, during a meeting in the Dahieh neighborhood of Beirut on Friday evening, the IDF confirmed in a statement issued Saturday afternoon.

Among the terrorists killed was Abu Hassan Samir, who served as the head of the Radwan Force training unit.

He held various positions within Hezbollah and was commander of the Radwan Force for a decade until early 2024.

Samir was one of the orchestrators of the "Conquer the Galilee" attack plan. He was involved in furthering Hezbollah's entrenchment in southern Lebanon while strengthening the terrorist organization's ground combat abilities.

The Radwan Force commander had planned and executed numerous shooting attacks and infiltrations into Israeli territory.

Additional Hezbollah commanders who were killed in the strike
The additional Radwan Force commanders who were killed in the strike were Samer Abdul-Halim Halawi, commander of the coastal area; Abbas Sami Maslamani, commander of the Qana area; Abdullah Abbas Hajazi, commander of the Ramim Ridge area; Muhammed Ahmad Reda, commander of the Al-Khiam area; and Hassan Hussein Madi, commander of the Mount Dov area.

These commanders have been leading attacks against Israel for years.

Additionally, senior officials in Hezbollah and within the Radwan Force headquarters were killed. These include Hassan Yussef Abad Alssatar, who was responsible for Radwan Force operations. He led and advanced all of the force's rocket fire operations.

Hussein Ahmad Dahraj, Chief of Staff of the Radwan Force, was also killed in the strike. He was involved in the transfer of weapons and the strengthening of the organization.

Friday, September 20, 2024

From Ian:

Andrew Fox: The British Government Must Not Abandon Israel
In the last six months, I have visited Israel three times. I have had meetings with President Herzog, Prime Minister Netanyahu, Defence Minister Gallant and Foreign Minister Katz. I have met every level of the IDF, from strategic planners in Tel Aviv, to Commander Southern Command, two the commanders of both Divisions who fought in Gaza, to ordinary IDF soldiers. In the last month, I have been to Gaza and witnessed the destruction there first hand.

The international attacks on Israel come on three fronts: Israel’s reasons for going to war; Israel’s conduct during the war; and international lawfare. Israel’s reasons for going to war

Firstly, propaganda is used to diminish and downplay Israel’s reason for this war in the first place: 7 October. I have seen demonic footage of that day above and beyond that which is publicly available. I have watched video recorded by Hamas themselves as they slaughtered Jews with inhuman glee. I have walked in human ashes in Kibbutz Be’eri, Nir Oz, and Kfar Aza. I have seen the Nova festival site and spoken to survivors. I have visited the IDF base at Nahal Oz, where amongst other atrocities, Hamas burned alive 22 IDF soldiers. I am friends with hostage families. There is no question – none whatsoever – that Israel’s war in Gaza against the monsters of Hamas is both just and legitimate. Even after three fighting tours in Afghanistan, I have never seen horror that comes close to that which Hamas perpetrated on 7 October.

Israel’s conduct during the war
Secondly is the international propaganda campaign to force Israel to lay down their arms. Israel is fighting against a disinformation machine, funded by their allies in Iran, Qatar, Turkey and other nations. Their aim is to persuade the world that Israel is committing war crimes, so they will pressure Israel to ceasefire, so that Hamas can survive.

Have mistakes and errors been committed in this war? Of course, and Israel’s supporters must confront them head on and own them. That is what moral countries do. We have all seen the footage of the WCK aid convoy strike. An independent Australian investigation agreed with the IDF’s conclusions: it was a sloppy mistake that led to innocent deaths. The IDF has already undertaken procedural changes so it does not happen again.

We have all seen the videos of IDF soldiers misbehaving in the houses of Gaza: unconscionably stupid behaviour that has caused irreparable harm to Israel’s cause in the eyes of the world. Again, it should be easy for us to condemn this stupidity.

Personally, as a British soldier, I take issue with the IDF’s prisoner handling procedures in stripping detainees naked. By the same token, we have all read of the horrors of Sde Temain detention facility and the assaults on prisoners that have taken place. All of these are objectively wrong, but none amount to a pattern of war crimes, and certainly none of them would have been prevented by a ban on UK arms sales.

What really matters is how the broader IDF handled them. They have taken accountability, they have changed procedures and rules of engagement, and they have arrested soldiers where crimes are credibly alleged. They are behaving exactly as I would expect from any Western military in the same situation.

And Western militaries are innocent of none of these things. The cruel truth is that mistakes and law-breaking happen in wartime. When you train young men and women to be aggressive; arm them; and send them into the most extreme of situations; some of them will lose discipline and make bad decisions. This is a simple fact of war. The Australian SAS committed war crimes in Afghanistan, executing prisoners. The British SAS are undergoing an investigation into similar allegations. In Iraq, the British had Camp Breadbasket and Baha Musa. The Americans in Iraq had the Abu Ghraib scandal, the Fallujah killings and the Mahmudiyah rape and murder. In Afghanistan, they killed ten innocent civilians with a drone strike even as they were withdrawing from Kabul. War is never clean or easy. What matters is accountability for mistakes.
Seth Mandel: Can Bennett Follow Bibi’s Path to Power?
Naftali Bennett appears to be the leading candidate to replace Benjamin Netanyahu atop Israeli politics, and the reason is simple: He’s the rare Bibi disciple-turned-rival who has clearly learned from his former boss’s own political rise.

Bennett in 2021 became Israel’s first post-Bibi premier in a decade as part of a rotating premiership with Yair Lapid, a centrist who had assembled a shaky coalition to oust the Likud from power. That government fell after about a year and a half and Netanyahu returned to the big chair.

Now Bennett is laying the groundwork for a comeback. A recent Channel 12 poll shows him leading Netanyahu in a head-to-head matchup by 11 and reveals that a party led by Bennett would be one of the largest in the Knesset. That combination shows a clear path to the premiership for Bennett if the trend holds.

Of course, opposition leader Benny Gantz has faded as a challenger to Netanyahu, but there’s reason to believe Bennett’s poll showing could be more resilient. In fact, the more Bennett seems to follow Netanyahu’s own path to power from earlier in his own career, the more the polls reward him.

Netanyahu began his political career in an ostensibly apolitical, or at least nonpartisan, role. Charismatic and telegenic, he was a diplomat and spokesman in the 1980s. He created a public profile in the media, built a rolodex of important political journalists, and ably made Israel’s case to the world from the outside. In the ’90s, he took over Likud leadership and then became Israel’s youngest-ever prime minister.

In 1999, he lost reelection to Ehud Barak, and made the decision to take a temporary break from politics. He resigned his Knesset seat and went into the private sector, speaking up on political issues as a self-described “concerned citizen” who was learning “to listen.” Within a couple years, Barak’s government was collapsing and Netanyahu passed up a rare opportunity to jump right back in to electoral politics to challenge him, choosing instead to bide his time.

Many see that decision as a mistake in retrospect because Bibi expected his Likud successor, Ariel Sharon, to be a caretaker premier and yet Sharon held on to office and reshaped Israeli politics. But it almost certainly paved the way for Netanyahu’s eventual turn as Israel’s longest-serving prime minister. By the time Sharon was felled by a stroke, he had splintered the Likud party. To complete the disengagement from Gaza, Sharon was forced to start his own centrist party. He took top deputies with him, which cleared the Likud of the main potential challengers to Bibi when he stood for party leadership in the wake of Sharon’s departure. The party was all his from that point on.

Bennett’s current strategy follows a similar path. In Israel, it has often been beneficial for aspiring leaders to avoid rancorous political moments and stay above the fray. That’s why Bennett is spending much time in the U.S. these days while party leaders in Israel fight over the prosecution of the war in Gaza and the possible war in Lebanon.
Jewish Professors Grapple With Shifting Roles on Campus
On Oct. 10, 2023, Susannah Heschel faced a packed audience in a Dartmouth classroom. Seated alongside Heschel were three other professors from Jewish studies and Middle Eastern studies. It was a Tuesday evening, and 80 people were crowded in the seats before her; a dozen were watching the livestream from an adjacent classroom; another 1,600 joined virtually.

The event, which Heschel organized together with her colleague Tarek El-Ariss, chair of Middle Eastern studies, was a forum for the Dartmouth College community titled “A Discussion on the Horrific Events Unfolding in Israel and Gaza.” Beyond trying to give Dartmouth students the opportunity to learn from experts in the field, Heschel and El-Ariss sought to model the type of thoughtful, respectful dialogue demanded of them as members of an academic institution.

And it worked: Less than two weeks later, the Forward ran an article proclaiming that, alone among our nation’s elite universities, “Dartmouth got it right.” By November, other universities began inviting Heschel and El-Ariss—billed as “Dartmouth experts” on fostering understanding and dialogue—to speak about their work, including Syracuse University, Trinity College, and the University of Virginia. And in February, Rep. Kathy Manning, co-chair of the House Antisemitism Task Force, stated that the Department of Education has been using Dartmouth as a model for other schools in the “best practices in handling discussions on antisemitism and the Middle East.” Over the past year, Heschel’s successful work has cemented her as the foremost expert in combating campus antisemitism through education.

Considering this impressive track record, you’d expect Heschel to be confident—or hopeful, at the very least—about her work as a Jewish professor on Dartmouth’s campus.

Yet that couldn’t be further from the truth.

“We were never trained on how to deal with these things,” Heschel told me in a telephone interview. Despite her nationally recognized success in educating and supporting Dartmouth students, I could hear Heschel’s frustration as she spoke. “We need advice.”

Heschel isn’t the only Jewish professor grappling with seemingly new expectations of her as an educator. Over the summer, I spoke with eight Jewish professors from American universities about their professional and personal experiences on campus since Oct. 7.

Across the board, every professor I spoke to was shocked by the explosion of antisemitism on campuses since Oct. 7. Some work in STEM fields and hadn’t encountered any anti-Israel rhetoric in their academic careers until recently; others, like Heschel, who work in Jewish studies or adjacent fields, have been keenly aware of academia’s dark underside for years.

Most professors reported that Oct. 7’s aftermath significantly changed their professional lives. Yet by far, I discovered, the most dramatic shift has been experienced by professors of Jewish studies. At many universities, the job description for Jewish studies is no longer just teaching Jewish history, culture, or thought—it’s solving antisemitism.
From Ian:

Melanie Phillips: An explosive moment of clarification
The Iranian war of extermination against Israel continues to be a clarifying moment for the supposedly civilised world. As this crisis continues, it is remorselessly spotlighting those who stand against such evil and those who are shamefully siding with it.

Israel’s astounding feat this week in killing or disabling thousands of senior Hezbollah operatives by causing their pagers and walkie-talkie radios to explode has sent its western enemies into a frenzy. Anti-Israel activists and the media have been falling over each other to claim that the attack indiscriminately endangered and killed innocent civilians and amounted to a reckless escalation of the war.

In fact, never in the history of warfare has there been a more precisely targeted attack against enemy combatants. The explosive devices had only been distributed to senior Hezbollah operatives. The small amount of explosive inside was designed to hurt only the carriers.

The number of civilian casualties was accordingly extremely small. All such casualties are regrettable. But those accusing Israel of recklessly endangering civilians and escalating the war fail to acknowledge the difference between deliberately aiming to kill civilians and inadvertently causing civilian casualties in a just war of defence.

They fail to register the dozens of Hezbollah missiles and rockets that Hezbollah is firing every day to kill Israelis. They fail to refer to the 12 Druze children and young people killed by such an attack in July on Majdal Shams. They fail to note that Hezbollah has been increasingly widening its target range ever more deeply into Israel.

Escalation, it seems, is a one-way street. It never applies to attacks on Israel, only to Israel when it defends itself.

The Biden administration continues to play a double game. Ever since the October 7 pogrom, it has pressured Israel not to take the steps needed to defeat Hamas, stop Hezbollah and neutralise Iran. That pressure has become frenzied in recent days as Israel has signalled it may have no alternative but to clear Hezbollah out of southern Lebanon altogether.

But at least the United States voted against the appalling resolution passed by the UN General Assembly on Wednesday — by 124-14 with 43 abstentions — demanding that Israel should end “its unlawful presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory” within 12 months.

The text of the resolution was based on the advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice in July that Israel’s “occupation of Palestinian territory” was illegal. But the ICJ is a kangaroo court, relying for its “evidence” entirely on falsehoods propagated by those who want to see the Jewish state destroyed.

That includes the United Nations itself, which is institutionally programmed for Israel’s destruction by singling it out for a campaign of lies, bullying, harassment, discrimination and demonisation that it deploys against no other country in the world.

This world body is morally bankrupt. So, too, is the British government, which couldn’t bring itself to vote against a resolution demanding Israel’s withdrawal to the 1948 ceasefire lines — dubbed by Israeli statesman Abba Eban “Auschwitz borders” because their indefensibility would guarantee Israel’s extermination — but instead abstained.
Richard Kemp: Israel is winning its war against Hezbollah. We should celebrate.
In the past 11 months they have killed an estimated 20,000 terrorists against 340 IDF deaths. On probably the most complex battlefield seen in modern warfare, they have also achieved great success in minimising civilian casualties and maximising aid deliveries.

Much of this experience from Gaza will be applied in Lebanon. There are differences of scale, terrain, population and tactics, but Hezbollah is another Iranian terror proxy like Hamas, trained, armed and equipped by Tehran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

Judging by events in Lebanon in the past few days, Israel’s intelligence penetration of Hezbollah is substantial, a factor that will have a major bearing on the prosecution of the war.

Severely damaging Hezbollah is not only in Israel’s interests but ours too.

In 2015, British security services, acting on Israeli intelligence, disrupted a Hezbollah bomb factory in London. Years before, Hezbollah was involved in killing hundreds of British and American soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan by Iranian proxies.

Iran is the controlling hand behind the conflict in the Middle East, including Houthi attacks on international shipping in the Red Sea and attacks on US bases in Syria, Jordan and Iraq. Tehran has set itself firmly against Western interests in Europe by supplying arms to Russia for attacking Ukraine, and it is on the threshold of becoming a nuclear armed state.

Israel deserves Britain’s support as its multi-front war with Iran shifts northwards. It does not deserve our shameful arms suspension, abstention on a Palestinian initiated anti Israel vote this week at the UN, or Starmer’s hand-wringing message of “deep concern” over the pager attacks.

At a time when this country is trying to weaken Iran with new sanctions for supplying ballistic missiles to Russia, these moves have the opposite effect and show diplomatic illiteracy.
Seth Frantzman: The Israel vs. Hezbollah War of 2024 Is Getting Closer to Reality
The exploding pagers now may push the Israel-Hezbollah conflict into a new phase. Hezbollah has suffered a large number of casualties. It is not clear how many Hezbollah fighters have been impacted. However, the group announced thirty-eight fallen members. This means the group has now lost 478 members since it began its attacks on Israel. The death toll for the September 17 exploding pagers incident is now the largest single-day death toll for the group since October 2023. Hezbollah will want to respond.

Meanwhile, the IDF is preparing for this eventuality. The IDF has sent its 98th Division, which is composed of commandos and paratroopers, to the north to prepare for escalation. The 98th Division played a key role in fighting in Gaza. It was the division that took Khan Younis from Hamas in January and February 2024, in tough fighting that required the commandos and combat engineers to enter tunnels to root out terrorists. The 98th gained more experience in a number of raids into Gaza between May and July 2024. The 98th Division will join the 36th Armored Division, which the IDF had redeployed from Gaza to the north earlier this year. Along with these units, the IDF has the 91st Division, which is the main division responsible for securing the Israeli border with Lebanon. These units have reserve brigades that have been rotated into the north and also trained throughout the war to prepare for possible confrontation with Hezbollah.

For the IDF, this has been a long waiting game. The IDF doesn’t train units to sit in bivouacs and stay on the defensive. Instead, Israel had trained for years for rapid ground maneuver of forces using the latest technology to work closely with the air force and navy to strike at enemies such as Hezbollah. In fact, the main training of units such as the 36th Division was for war in the north. Its constituent units, such as the Golani infantry and 7th Armored, often trained to assault hilly and mountainous terrain, as one would find in southern Lebanon. Israel’s soldiers are well prepared for a war in the north.

The question facing Israel’s political leadership and its security establishment is what kind of strategy it has now for the Lebanon front and Gaza. In Gaza, the fighting has been reduced since its heavy clashes during the opening months of the war. The IDF has two divisions in Gaza, one on the Egyptian border and one in central Gaza. Hamas has lost many fighters and has fewer rockets than when the war began. However, the terrorist group is still deadly. On September 17, the IDF announced that four soldiers had been killed and a number wounded in southern Gaza. The fight is ongoing against Hamas, which continues to control parts of central and northern Gaza.

Meanwhile, in Lebanon, Hezbollah has suffered a setback. Nonetheless, it still has more than 30,000 fighters under arms. It has dug into areas in southern Lebanon, tunneling into the rocky countryside and preparing for a major war. With Iranian backing, the group also expects to receive support from other fronts, such as Iranian proxy militias in Syria and Iraq.

Hezbollah also has forces in Syria. Hezbollah is aware of Israel’s capabilities, and it knows that Israel is now concentrating forces in the north. However, it also believes that it has enough capabilities to pose a serious threat to Israel. If Hezbollah chooses to strike Israel, it will be unleashing a war whose outcome and dynamics neither side could possibly predict.
  • Friday, September 20, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
Times of Israel says:
The IDF confirms the killing of senior Hezbollah commander Ibrahim Aqil in an airstrike in Lebanon’s capital Beirut earlier this afternoon.

In a statement, the IDF says Aqil was the head of Hezbollah’s military operations, the acting commander of the terror group’s elite Radwan Force, and the head of a plan to invade the Galilee.

Alongside Aqil, the top brass of Hezbollah’s operations array and the leadership of the Radwan Force were killed in the strike, according to the military.

“Aqil and the commanders who were eliminated were among the architects of the ‘plan for the occupation of the Galilee,’ in which Hezbollah planned to raid Israeli territory, occupy the communities of the Galilee, murder and kill innocents, similar to what the Hamas terror organization carried out in the murderous massacre on October 7,” the IDF says in the statement.
The US Government has a "Rewards for Justice" page for Aqil:
Rewards for Justice is offering a reward of up to $7 million for information on Hizballah key leader Ibrahim Aqil.

Ibrahim Aqil, also known as Tahsin, serves on Hizballah’s highest military body, the Jihad Council.

During the 1980s, Aqil was a principal member of Islamic Jihad Organization—Hizballah’s terrorist cell—that claimed the bombings of the U.S. Embassy in Beirut in April 1983, which killed 63 people, and the U.S. Marine barracks in October 1983, which killed 241 U.S. personnel.

In the 1980s, Aqil directed the taking of American and German hostages in Lebanon and held them there.

On July 21, 2015, the U.S. Department of the Treasury designated Aqil pursuant to Executive Order 13582 for acting for or on behalf of Hizballah. Subsequently, on September 10, 2019, the U.S. Department of State designated Aqil as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist pursuant to Executive Order 13224, as amended.
Well, he received justice, but I don't think there will be any reward. As of this writing, I don't see any official US reaction to the killing, even though he was involved in the deaths of hundreds of Americans.

Any reaction, or lack of reaction, tells more about how the current and potential next administration feels about Israel than any number of carefully crafted "both sides" statements.

One other detail: Aqil was killed in an underground bunker or basement beneath a residential building in Beirut. And somehow most or all of the dead are Hezbollah.

Nobody takes more care to avoid civilian casualties than Israel. 

Haaretz reports that Aqil was injured in a pager explosion and was released from the hospital this morning. Israel is probably monitoring the injured to track the top leaders  for future assassinations. 



Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Friday, September 20, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon



The New York Times reports:
Former President Donald J. Trump, speaking on Thursday at a campaign event in Washington centered on denouncing antisemitism in America, said that “if I don’t win this election,” then “the Jewish people would have a lot to do with a loss.”
Was what he said antisemitic?

First, we must look at the entire statement, not just the excerpt. At the IAC event, he said::
I'll put it to you very simply and as gently as I can.  I wasn't treated properly by the voters who happen to be Jewish. I don't know, do they know what the hell is happening?  

If I don't win this election, and the Jewish people would really have a lot to do with that if that happens because at 40% that means 60% of the people are voting for the enemy, Israel in my opinion will cease to exist within two years, and I believe I'm 100% right.
At the antisemitism event, he said:
In my opinion the the Jewish people would have a lot to do with a loss. If I'm at 40%, think of it, that means 60% of voting for Kamala who in particular is a bad Democrat .

My first impression was that the statement was not antisemitic, but it could incite antisemitism. If Trump loses, he pretty much told his supporters that it would be (partially) the Jews fault. This is a breathtakingly stupid and irresponsible thing to say. It is not purposeful incitement, but the effect is the same.

But gut instincts are not what is needed to determine whether a statement is antisemitic or not.  

This is a perfect application for the EoZ Algorithmic Definition of Antisemitism. As an algorithm, it is far more objective than any other definition out there. So let's run his statements through the algorithm:


Under this definition, Trump's statement was antisemitic. It was denigration of Jews as a group (whether he considers Jews a people, ethnic group or religion doesn't matter for this purpose.)  

Even if his statement is true, it doesn't make it less antisemitic. He attacked the (overwhelmingly Democratic) American Jewish community as a whole. 

One could argue that it is his respect for Jews that prompts him to say things like this, that he holds them to higher standards. But that is not a defense. Imagine if he had said that any potential loss would partially be the fault of Blacks - it is obvious that this would be considered racist. 

Trump could have used the same statistic and turned it into a positive from his perspective. He could have said that only 24% of Jews voted for him in 2016 and now polls say that number has gone up to 40%, a remarkable 67% increase, and he could have used that statistic to inspire the audience to increase that number even further. 

The statement was stupid, inciting and antisemitic, and although Trump would never do it, he should apologize. 




Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

AddToAny

EoZ Book:"Protocols: Exposing Modern Antisemitism"

Printfriendly

EoZTV Podcast

Podcast URL

Subscribe in podnovaSubscribe with FeedlyAdd to netvibes
addtomyyahoo4Subscribe with SubToMe

search eoz

comments

Speaking

translate

E-Book

For $18 donation








Sample Text

EoZ's Most Popular Posts in recent years

Hasbys!

Elder of Ziyon - حـكـيـم صـهـيـون



This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For 20 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.

Donate!

Donate to fight for Israel!

Monthly subscription:
Payment options


One time donation:

Follow EoZ on Twitter!

Interesting Blogs

Blog Archive