I've been
reporting about how aid workers in Gaza have been
sexually abusing women, extorting sexual favors out of them in exchange for food or other aid. The UN even called that sexual abuse by aid workers could become an "
epidemic." (And this
pre-dates October 7.)
The UN reports on these but
buries them inside much larger reports. I have seen press releases on such abuse in other countries, but in Gaza, this news must be made as inaccessible as possible.
The
latest report from the UN warns that sexual abuse increases when access to food is limited. And, sure enough, buried within the report is the indication that aid workers are among the abusers, couched in language to make this seem as innocuous as possible. It says, at aid distribution points, "
Aid workers, guards, or community leaders
may exploit power asymmetries, demanding sex in exchange for food or access to other aid supplies."
It isn't a headline. It is practically a footnote.
This isn't the only problem with the report. It doesn't blame Palestinian men for abusing their wives and daughters. No, it is food insecurity that is the problem, and Palestinian men as just acting naturally. Look how this section is worded:
GBV [Gender-Based Violence] as a Consequence of
Household-Level Food Scarcity
When households face chronic
food shortages:
Tensions and conflict within
the home increase, often
escalating into intimate
partner violence (IPV),
particularly when men feel
their provider role is
threatened.
Women are blamed for unmet
expectations of feeding
children and managing
household needs—despite
having limited control over
food access.
Economic stress reduces
household resilience and may
lead to coercive coping
strategies, such as exchanging
sex for food or money
("survival sex") and pushing
young girls into marriage to
reduce family size with the
purpose of reducing pressure
on the head of the family.
In some cases, food deprivation
itself is used as a tool of control.
For example, abusive partners or
family members may deliberately
deny women or girls access to
food as a form of punishment.
Notice how it uses the passive voice to describe outrageous behavior. In reality, GBV isn't a consequence of food scarcity - it is exacerbated by it. A society that respects women would never resort to these kinds of activities no matter how bad things are - on the contrary, the men would be actively protecting their women. If it is true that obtaining aid is dangerous for women, why aren't the husbands getting the aid themselves?
The underlying theme of all UN reports that talk about gender based violence in Gaza is that the perpetrators are hardly ever to blame. It is a cultural thing.