![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh6p6_Lny3T4fjO-cnTS_6to4VnNw24lHoJEuciKtIBcVy_2IJoGLco1SMhet_FfiT5x_1Q-4ms5zxfN39V74m0VFRzVw8yFYrhDu4gLWDz3iqjGt07FaX6qsNsdQ2vDINTlJheRw/s200/camera5.png)
A subthread opened up from Mairav Zonszein, who styles herself as a journalist and has published in The Guardian, the New York Times, the Forward and elsewhere:
Two of the major principles that journalists are supposed to adhere to are fairness and accuracy. We've already shown that Zonszein violates both of those principles, yet calls herself a journalist.
A third major principle is accountability, that journalists must issue corrections and apologies when they violate the other principles. By attacking a media watchdog, Zonszein shows that she is also violating that principle.
So what exactly makes her - and the other critics of CAMERA in the field who refuse to adhere to basic journalistic standards - "journalists"?
I am on the record that I will correct any errors I write no matter what the political orientation of the critic. Why do left-wing journalists have such a problem adhering to the same, basic standard? Even worse, why do they castigate the people who find the errors?
It is almost as if these so-called "journalists" value bias over truth.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhPXC-7JCBQFt3Hukw7FNw-DmUIZOfoU4LByJP1a4E3cmARPBMqdnc5H_N8LBOQTm2UqxmuhjTS7ZI611229Sd4a8l5zqALzSaW0TVkubkQkVGb6hiF8IzkMY1NGZZW5tezbnLv5g/s1600/donate+sparkles.gif)
![](http://img2.blogblog.com/img/icon18_edit_allbkg.gif)