Here are some examples they dug up during May and June:
Yediot Ahronot dated 05/01/2013, mentions "the return of Palestinian terrorism" in reference to the stabbing murder of Evyatar Borovsky the day before.
Israel Hayom on May 5 said "the overwhelming number of terrorists are Muslim."
Israel Hayom, 5/5, had an article calling for striking Islamic terrorism in Judea and Samaria.
Yediot, 5/5, said the bedouin were taking over the Negev.
Makor Rishon, 5/13, said that Palestinian Arab prisoners were murderers and terrorists.
All the articles saying that Muhammad al-Dura was not killed by the IDF was considered to be incitement.
Israel Hayom, 5/20, discussed the Palestinian culture of lies that led to the Al Dura hoax.
They did bring a couple of cases that were close to legitimate examples of bias, for example the assumption that a bank robber in Beersheva was an Arab without (apparent) evidence, but I see very little that can be considered incitement in their examples - and this is without even checking if they were translating them accurately.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db604/db6040395bf182030f7b3256c75a436a86ae9a2e" alt=""