Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

Wednesday, May 14, 2014

05/14 Links Pt1: Turkey Hosts UN Anti Israel Conference; Israel Offers Help for Turkey Mine Disaster

From Ian:

Michael Lumish: And Peace to You, Jimmy Baby

Some say that Jimmy Carter is an anti-Semite, although I have never drawn that conclusion. What I think is that Carter remains entrenched within the kind of left-leaning, soft-hearted, soft-minded, Vietnam War era sensibility that vilified western imperialism and romanticized anti-imperialist forces of any sort – however violent, however vile – so long as they represented “people of color.”
How else to explain Carter’s equanimity with Hamas’s articulated genocidal intentions? How else to explain that he honestly believes that murderous lunatics make for good negotiating partners?
I tell you what. I have a better idea. Instead of folding Hamas into the PLO – which, itself, is a terrorist organization, of course – why do we not defeat Hamas and thereby make them go away?
I know that wishing to actually defeat one’s mortal enemies is today considered dangerously hard-right radical, but I feel reasonably certain that Franklin Roosevelt approved of the notion.

Netanyahu: In Unity Deal, Abbas Would be Held Responsible for Gaza Rocket Attacks

Speaking ahead of meeting Japanese Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida, in Tokyo, as part of a state visit, Netanyahu described the unity pact as “a turn for the worst” because “Hamas is committed to our destruction.” But he said, “We remain committed to advancing the peace, preferably a negotiated peace.”
“We can only negotiate with a government whose constituent parts are committed to peace. If President Abbas goes ahead with this national unity with Hamas, a terrorist organization that regularly fires rockets into Israel, then we’ll have to hold him accountable for every rocket that is fired from Gaza, to Israel,” he said. “We hope that this pact is dissolved and we can find a way to return to genuine negotiations with a genuine peace partner.”

Missile from Gaza fired at southern Israel

A missile alert went off in the Hof Ashkelon Regional Council before 7 a.m. Wednesday morning after a rocket was fired out of the Gaza Strip at southern Israel.
There were no reports of injuries or damage and security forces began searching for the impact site, apparently in an open area, Israel Radio reported.

Caroline Glick: Believing Obama on Iran

The malevolent slander of Israel’s actions and intentions is of course only the opening act in this new administration campaign to discredit Israel ahead of a nuclear deal with Iran. Speaking to The Washington Free Beacon, former Bush administration deputy national security advisor Elliott Abrams said he believes the administration will frame the issue “saying that it’s this deal or war.”
He’s doubtlessly correct. After all that what the administration did in November when it signed the interim deal and when it forced the Senate to mothball its sanctions bill against Iran.
The truth is that the choice isn’t between war and an agreement. It is between doing something to stop Iran from becoming a nuclear power, or doing nothing to prevent that from happening. The administration has opted to do nothing. Unfortunately for the world, the price for doing nothing to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons is exponentially higher – in the cost of lives that would otherwise be saved – than the price of doing something.

Proposed "unity" PA minister says Jews want to take over the world

Palestine Today lists the so-called "technocrats" who are proposed as ministers for the unified Fatah-Hamas terror government.

The person earmarked to be the Religious Affairs minister is Sheikh Yusuf Salama, a preacher at the Al Aqsa mosque.

Here is what he wrote about Jews in a 2010 article:

[We must] expose the Jews and their nature, and this is the duty of the nation's scholars and opinion leaders ...relying on the Holy Quran and the Sunnah, [which have the most] detailed description of the Jews, then the history books and the writings of contemporaries with them - Muslims and non-Muslims - written in Arabic or other languages such as book by French Muslim philosopher Roger Garaudy [a well-known Holocaust denier - EoZ] It is contemporary reality, ...Their most prominent qualities are racist. They see themselves as God's chosen people, and their aspirations are for an expansionist Greater Israel from the Nile to the Euphrates are not limited to that, but they want to control the whole world.

There will of course be a global uproar at the very idea that the PA government would have such an antisemite as a minister. Jodi Rudoren will have an above-the-fold feature in the New York Times about this. President Obama, who recently received an award for his role in fighting antisemitism, will publicly call for Salama's removal. Ken Roth of Human Rights Watch will write an op-ed about how it is unacceptable for a government to incite such hate. Palestinian NGOs like Miftah will call for the PA to drop Salama immediately. Mondoweiss and Ali Abunimah and Max Blumenthal and Juan Cole will be writing outraged blog posts about this.

Because all of these people and organizations solemnly insist that antisemitism has no place in today's world, and they all claim that they are against wanton Jew-hatred.

Certainly if a Jewish minister in Israel would say such bigoted things about Arabs in private and it was leaked, all these people and organizations would make a huge deal over it and force him or her out of office in disgrace. The idea of a minister of a government publicly holding such views is certainly anathema and will cause a worldwide uproar.

It's not like all these people are hypocrites, right? It cannot be that they believe that some antisemitism, from, say, Arabs, is acceptable and no big deal. They are all people of principle, who publicly disavow any vestige of Jew-hatred.

All we have to do is sit back and wait for the avalanche of criticism to materialize. The upcoming uproar will make the Donald Sterling story seem like nothing in comparison, since - objectively speaking - Sheikh Salama is much, much worse.

The outrage will begin any minute now.

The argument that Israel is an "apartheid state" rests on the fact that Arabs who live in the West Bank and Gaza do not have the same rights as Israeli citizens.One common example given is that they cannot vote in Israeli elections.

The reason for them being treated differently is, of course, is because they are not Israeli citizens. They can vote for their own PA government, and once upon a time they did. Given that Arab citizens of Israel do have equal rights under the law (although they do suffer from discrimination, as minorities in every nation do) calling Israel an apartheid state for not allowing non-citizens to vote is absurd.

However, there are millions of full citizens of the United States who are not allowed, by law, to vote in national elections.

Residents of Puerto Rico, the US Virgin Islands, Guam and other territories cannot vote in federal elections. The US Constitution requires a voter to be resident in one of the 50 states, or in the District of Columbia, to vote in federal elections.

That's about 4.2 million US citizens who are disenfranchised - by law - from voting for their president.

But that is only one group of US citizens who are not allowed to vote. Another group is even larger.

About six million people who committed crimes cannot vote in US. In some states, even after prisoners are released they do not regain voting rights.

Not only that, but about three quarters of the US citizens who are denied the right to vote in federal elections are minorities - about 60% of prisoners and nearly all of the residents of the US territories, - which is even further indication of US apartheid based on race!

Obviously, to call the US an apartheid state is absurd. But anyone who claims that Israel is an "apartheid state" must believe that the United States is far more guilty of the crime of apartheid than Israel is, given its legal discrimination against about 10 million US citizens.

For some reason, none of the Israel haters, who pretend to care so much about equal rights, are bothered by US legal discrimination against far more people who are actual US citizens. Isn't that a shocker.

(Note: In Israel, prisoners can vote for Knesset and arrangements are made for them to do so.)

Isn't it awful when buildings are demolished?

Ma'an's top story:

Israeli bulldozers demolished three Palestinian structures in East Jerusalem early Wednesday, locals told Ma'an.

Accompanied by Israeli forces and police officers, bulldozers entered the Palestinian neighborhoods of Beit Hanina, Shuafat, and Ras al-Amoud, where they destroyed two shops and a workshop.

Look at those racist Israelis, doing things to Arabs they would never do to Jews.

Oh, wait:

Security forces began an operation to demolish 10 illegal structures in the West Bank outpost of Ma’ale Rehavam early Wednesday afternoon, after the High Court rejected claims by settlers that the land the buildings are on was purchased legally.

...[S]ecurity forces geared up for violent resistance as they carry out a court order to demolish 28 structures in three West Bank outposts, including a synagogue.

After the court rejected the settlers’ claims, forces were given the go-ahead to begin demolishing the structures, three of which house families.

Three Arab shops in Jerusalem being demolished are Ma'an's main story, and it ignores Israel demolishing 28 Jewish-owned buildings on the same day.

Like most modern states, Israel is a nation of laws. If you build something illegally, very possibly you will lose your investment. If you move a family there, they will lose their home. Whether you are Jewish or Arab.

What are the statistics of how many Jewish buildings have been demolished in recent years? I don't know - I can't find any European-funded NGO that spends the time to count them. One report finds that in the late 1990s/early 2000s there were far more demolitions of Jewish homes than Arab homes in Jerusalem. Israel has certainly demolished a number of illegal Jewish settlements since then.

I suspect that there are a lot more Jewish buildings being destroyed than you see in the news.

The Jewish home demolitions are not something to be publicized, because the fact that it ever happens completely contradicts the main thesis of B'Tselem and ICAHD and all the other well-funded organizations that claim that Israel is discriminating against Arabs. They won't ever dare count demolitions of Jewish homes or make a comparison. The UN and Amnesty and Human Rights Watch doesn't care whether homes are built legally or illegally - they only care if the homes being demolished don't belong to Jews.

And once again, the truth is sacrificed on the altar of hate.

(UPDATE: Removed the sentence " I can say that between 1993 and 2001, far more Jewish homes were demolished in Jerusalem than Arab homes." since I could not verify that in that linked paper, which is worth reading anyway. But the same author wrote the more comprehensive study that is excerpted in the link above. H/t Alexi.)

Surprise! Arabs hate Jews more than anyone else does

The ADL released its statistics on worldwide antisemitism. There is a lot to go through but one fact is clear: Arab nations in the Middle East, hate Jews far more than the rest of the world.

Here are the aggregate scores by region of the percent of people with antisemitic attitudes. Not surprisingly, the Middle East has by far the highest concentration of antisemites.

In the Arab Middle East, the scores range from a low of 74% of Saudis with antisemitic attitudes up to 93% of Palestinian Arabs, who hate Jews the most in the world.

Interestingly, the Arab countries considered the most moderate and friendly to Jews had very high scores. Morocco and the supposedly liberal UAE are at 80% and Tunisia, in the news this week for the allowing Jews to go on pilgrimage there, scores 86% antisemitic.

The non-Arab countries who hate Jews the most in the world are Turkey and Greece (69%), Malaysia (61%), Armenia (58%) and Iran (56%).

The country with the least antisemitism, by far, was ...Laos, with a score of a mere 0.2%. Compare that to the US, with 9%.

Interestingly, the ADL didn't survey Israel.

05/13 Links Pt2: J Street Challenged to Condemn PA War Crimes; Vassar SJP Tweets Nazi Propaganda

From Ian:

J Street, I Dare You to Condemn PA War Crimes

Hey J Street, I dare you to create one Facebook post that puts part of the blame for the failed peace talks on the PA’s incitement to kill Jews. Seems like a no-brainer for a “pro-Israel” and “pro-peace” organization, right?
In the past six days on its official Facebook page, J Street has blamed settlements and/or Bibi for the collapse of the peace processes three times. Meanwhile, it has yet to mention even once the PA’s unwillingness to make any concessions, the PA’s glorification of terrorism, and the PA’s continuous incitement to genocide (which is a war crime) as even slight obstacles to peace.
J Street claims to be “pro-Israel” and pro-peace,” but it only condemns Israel and it ignores obvious obstacles to peace committed by the PA.
War crimes and the glorification of terrorism seem to me to be pretty large obstacles to peace; shouldn’t these PA actions be blamed at least partially for the collapse of the peace process? Or how about the PA’s recent partnership with the terrorist group Hamas?

Amos Oz is a Dangerous Opportunist

He sent an autographed copy of his book along with a love letter to Marwan Barghouti, convicted murderer of innocent Jews and planner of the Second Intifada, Israel's greatest massacre of civilians.
Now Amos Oz has called the unidentified price taggers, whom he has considers exemplars of right wing Jews in Judea and Samaria, "neo-Nazis", condemning them to a similarly sinister, diabolical fate. Oz previously referred to traditional Jews as "filth." (h/t Elder of Lobby)

Auschwitz Survivor's Son Hits Back at Oz's 'Nazi' Slur

Nationalistic screen writer and satirist Tal Gilad, whose father is a famous Holocaust survivor, has fired back at famed writer Amos Oz for his statement that so-called Hilltop Youth and perpetrators of Price Tag attacks are “Hebrew neo-Nazis.”
Gilad's Facebook post Sunday was widely shared and lauded.
"Hello Amos Oz,” wrote Gilad, who was the main scriptwriter for the Latma satire show.
"The word 'Nazi,' or – in the form that is considered somehow softer – 'neo-Nazi', is too often used as a doomsday weapon on any subject, apparently because people like you, who blurt it out freely, are unable of fathoming the depth of horror of Nazism and what it perpetrated," he accused.
"People are always trying to place this term in a mold that will make it understandable for our consciousness. But that is impossible, because a Nazi is not simply someone very bad, or a nationalist, or a traffic policeman. A Nazi is something else, from a different reality. (h/t Elder of Lobby)

PCUSA Activists Promote Three Big Lies in Zionism Unsettled

Since its founding in 2004, the Israel Palestine Mission Network of the Presbyterian Church (USA) has been engaged in an ongoing effort to delegitimize Israel and its supporters, Jews especially, in the United States.
Three Big Lies
Zionism Unsettled promotes three big lies.
The first big lie is that Zionism as a political movement and Israel as a country have been sheltered from debate, particularly in mainline churches in the U.S.
The second big lie is that Jews were well treated in Muslim countries in the Middle East until Israel's founding in 1948.
The third big lie is that Israel is singularly responsible for the suffering of the Palestinians. “Zionism is the problem,” the text states on page 56.

A story of 19th century Jewish-Muslim cooperation - and current Muslim hate

Here is an enlightening 2007 article from YNet, by Yehuda Litani:

Dome of the Rock in 1890

In the years 1992-3 the late King Hussein of Jordan financed the renovations of the golden dome, which was carried out by a construction company from Northern Ireland. On a visit to the site during those renovations I discovered a story that wasn’t known until then, regarding the Jewish-Ottoman-Palestinian connection to the mosques on Temple Mount.

The Dome of the Rock was surrounded with scaffolding, and before ascending one of them a friend of mine drew my attention to an iron panel that lay on the floor and was inscribed in French. The foreman of the Irish construction company said the panel had been found between the two halves of the crescents at on top of the mosque, and was temporarily dismantled so that the dome could be coated in gold.

The words in French revealed that the Mosque had been renovated in 1899 during Turkish rule, and that the works had been assisted by the Jewish community in Jerusalem led by a public figure called Avraham (Albert) Entebbe, who among his numerous other activities was also the principal of the city's "Kol Israel Haverim" school.

Entebbe, who was the undersigned on the French inscription, was known for his courageous ties with the heads of the Ottoman rule, and the inscription noted that for the purpose of renovating the mosques on the Temple Mount five acclaimed Jewish artists had been invited to Jerusalem. The Jewish stone carvers, wood carvers and iron mongers from various cities in the Mediterranean basin, shared their skills with their Muslim brothers during months of work.

The inscription also noted that all the students at Entebbe's school were given a three-month leave in order to assist their Muslim brothers in the renovations works on Temple Mount. In the last lines of the inscription, Entebbe described the ideal cooperation and understanding that prevailed between Jews and Muslims in the Holy City, which reached its zenith when the Jews undertook renovations of the Temple Mount mosques in 1899.

I told the Irish foreman about my discovery, and asked him to look after the iron panel so that I could take a photograph of it. The foreman apparently told Waqf representatives about the panel, and when we came back to the site the next day the panel was no longer there. The foreman said the Waqf had taken it away. When I asked one of them a few days later where the iron panel was, he said that he didn’t know what I was talking about.

The iron panel, which told the story of the wonderful cooperation between the Jews and Muslims under Turkish rule, disappeared. There is no chance of it reappearing in the future, because it doesn't serve the Waqf's current interests. Yet at a time of harsh words and hatred it's rather nice to reminisce on days gone by.

Besides the already stunning story about Jews helping renovate one of the most iconic Muslim symbols, think about what kind of hate the Waqf has where it cannot consider having anyone ever finding out about it.

(h/t JW)

I am pleased to say that EoZ will be publishing a regular column from the excellent humor site, PreOccupied Territory.

Here's the first:

Berkeley, California, May 14 - Advocates of the Boycott, Divest, Sanctions movement against Israel expressed frustration today that their lobbying efforts targeting major cultural figures have yet to elicit a commitment from the world's most famous composer not to appear in Israel.

BDS activists have been focusing on high-profile figures in academia, the arts, film, music, and other fields, attempting to convince them not to maintain ties with fans or colleagues in Israel. Though it has enjoyed only mixed success at best, the movement continues to lobby those figures, especially celebrities, in the hope that such prominent people declaring a boycott will encourage others to behave in similar fashion. However, they have yet to succeed in scoring the endorsement of anyone with the stature of Ludwig van Beethoven.

Beethoven's music has provided the soundtrack for some of history's most enduring moments, such as the final victory over Napoleon in 1815. The choral finale of his Ninth Symphony, a setting of Schiller's Ode to Joy, is perhaps the most famous piece of music ever composed, surpassed perhaps only by the opening bars of his Fifth Symphony, and was adopted as the theme of the European Union. The chorus was conducted by none other than maestro Leonard Bernstein at a concert celebrating the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. Gaining the backing of a seminal figure such as Beethoven would put wind in the BDS movement's sails, but they have yet to come close to succeeding.

"Part of the difficulty is tracking him down," confesses Omar Barghouti, a BDS pioneer. "He seems to be a very private person. But I rather doubt he hasn't heard of us, as we've been attracting attention across Europe and North America for a number of years." Barghouti speculates that perhaps the composer does not wish to make any political statements, but other activists note that such neutrality would not be in keeping with Beethoven's character.

"Beethoven had no problem erasing the dedication to Napoleon at the top of his 'Eroica' Symphony when Napoleon declared himself emperor of France in 1804," said musicologist and BDS activist Hedda P'myass. "He was quite clear on where he stood when it came to international politics." P'myass, for her part, suggested that the composer had sympathies for Israel, but was uncomfortable voicing them in polite company.

Barghouti says the movement will keep trying. "We might not have convinced Mr. Beethoven not to have ties with Israel, but he hasn't yet visited there, either," he noted. "If we keep the pressure on, maybe it will stay that way."

"Or we will just declare that he supports boycotting Israel, as we usually do." [EoZ]

05/13 Links Pt1: Boko Haram and the Death of Feminism; Will Iran become North Korea?

From Ian:

Michael Lumish: Boko Haram and the Death of Feminism

One would expect that given the outrageous violations of the rights of women among Islamist groups that western feminists would vehemently object to those violations, yet they do not.
Nor, of course, do they tend to stand with Israel which is the only country in the entire Middle East which stands with them.
If western feminists honestly objected to the abuse of women in other parts of the world – and if they honestly believed in universal human rights – then we would see some expression of that objection on places like Daily Kos and the Huffington Post.

Israelis Are On The Ground Assisting In The Search For Nigeria’s Missing Schoolgirls

Israeli security forces are already on the ground in Nigeria, gathering intelligence and assisting in the search for hundreds of schoolgirls who were kidnapped by the extremist Islamist group Boko Haram.
“There are ongoing security ties and cooperation between Israel and Nigeria. In the wake of this crisis, Israel increased its assistance and we have been providing support in any manner possible,” said one military official, who only recently returned from Nigeria. “We have been involved on this from the beginning.”
A Nigerian delegation is also currently in Israel, an official at Israel’s Foreign Ministry said. The official declined to provide information on what exactly they were doing in the country or how Israeli forces were assisting in the search for the girls. Israeli radio commentators have suggested that Israeli commandos could be on the ground in Nigeria, but Israeli officials would not confirm or deny that report.
On Monday morning, Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan publicly accepted an Israeli offer of assistance made Sunday by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

King David Hotel Manager Dismisses Newsweek Spying Report – Air Conditioner Vent Too Small for ‘Even a Cat’

Speaking to The Algemeiner, Dror Danini-Forsyth, the hotel’s manager, said, unlike in big U.S. hotels, the air conditioning system in most Israeli hotels, including Jerusalem’s King David, is a set of small vents that heat or cool air in the rooms, rather than being pumped in through a large duct that a man could crawl through, as described in the Newsweek report.
“I can confirm that the story is ridiculous,” Danini-Forsyth said. “There is a small pipe that brings some fresh air into the room, and it is so small that even a cat cannot walk in it.”
The architectural inconsistency would invalidate the anecdote relayed by Stein from an unnamed U.S. Secret Service agent.

UNRWA released a statement to several Arabic newspapers warning of serious health crisis on the horizon in Gaza.

There is a severe shortage of vaccines in Gaza, and those for polio, the mumps, rubella and meningitis have been completely depleted, while those for tetanus and whooping cough are dangerously low.

UNRWA warned that polio is starting to spread again in the Middle East because of the Syrian war.

As of this writing, this statement is not found at UNRWA's website. Their Twitter account only links to an Al Jazeera Arabic version of the story - a story that implies that Israel is responsible for the shortage, as it reports this story together with the launch of a "Popular Committee Against the Siege on Gaza." Even that is only mentioned in Arabic.

Why is UNRWA so reluctant to publicize this story of an impending heath catastrophe in English?

Perhaps their statement to Ma'an sheds some light.

In that statement, the UNRWA spokesperson Abu Hasna says that the responsibility of purchasing vaccines rests with the Gaza Ministry of Health and that UNRWA has warned them about this looming crisis for months.

Israel does not, and never has, restricted vaccines into Gaza. The Al Jazeera story, and the reporting of other Arabic media outlets, imply that this is part of the "siege" - but they are lying.

The looming health crisis is purely the result of Hamas either not caring about the health of people under its control, or a cynical purposeful creation of an epidemic by Hamas to make Israel look bad. That is not so far fetched, as Hamas has done exactly that by refusing imports of fuel to Gaza even when Israel was willing to provide it.

UNRWA, always eager to blame Israel for all problems, does not want to publicly say anything bad about Hamas. So instead of publicly shaming Hamas for refusing to allow life-saving vaccines to enter Gaza, UNRWA only discreetly planted stories about the issue in Arabic media and downplayed the reasons for the crisis, hoping that Hamas will take the hint without UNRWA having to go public to the West.

How much can UNRWA really care about the "refugees" when they are so reluctant to publicize how badly they are being treated by their Arab leaders?

Meanwhile, Israel has approved some 26 construction projects into Gaza, including 12 for UNRWA.

That isn't on their website either, because this is another story that doesn't fit UNRWA's anti-Israel agenda - and agenda that clearly trumps its mission.

(Similarly, I have not yet found this story on any of the usual "pro-Palestinian" websites.)

(h/t Ibn Boutros)

Arabic media has exploded in the past few hours claiming that Israeli authorities demanded that the Latin Patriarchate remove a poster welcoming Pope Francis that was put up on their building near Jaffa Gate, so "as not to provoke the wrath of the Jews."

Dmitry Dliany, Secretary-General of the National Assembly of Christians, is outraged, telling the media that this is one more example of how Israel is denying Christians and Muslims to have any rights in the city, and it is an example of ethnic cleansing, and probably that the IDF kills cute baby puppies.

I can't find any proof of this story anywhere. There are no photos of this supposed poster. The Latin Patriachate Facebook page doesn't mention a thing about this story.

While I can see, maybe, a situation where Jerusalem authorities would demand that a freestanding sign be taken down for zoning or safety reasons, the chances that any Israeli authority said that a poster of the Pope must be taken down so as "not to provoke the wrath of the Jews" is zero.

This story is just another anti-Israel lie.

UPDATE: Bob Knot found a photo of the poster with the story on Facebook:

The #Israeli police department asked the #Catholic #Church to remove welcome to the #Pope banner displayed on the wall of the #Christian Information Center, a Franciscan property, in order not offend the feelings of the #Jewish groups who oppose the Pope's visit. This Place is located in Jaffa Gate area in the Old City of occupied Jerusalem, which is in the Christian Quarter. Welcome to the only democracy in the Middle East!

I still don't believe that any Israeli authorities asked them to take it down because of possible Jewish reactions.

UPDATE 2: Now, this makes sense: (h/t Bob K)

According to the sources, the church decided not to remove the sign, while police claimed they did not ask for the removal of these reasons, but for legal reasons relating to the law on placing banners on archaeological sites.

Verified here.

Any chance Dliany will apologize? Yeah, sure.

UPDATE 3: Too bad Israeli police don't enforce this rule on the Temple Mount:

Ha'aretz reveals its mission has nothing to do with journalism

What is the mission of a newspaper?

One might think that it is to help people stay informed, or to report the day's events objectively.

The New York Times describes its goal as "to cover the news as impartially as possible ...and to treat readers, news sources, advertisers and others fairly and openly, and to be seen to be doing so."

Various journalism outlets and professional societies describe their codes of ethics to include truthfulness, accuracy, objectivity, impartiality, fairness and public accountability.

How about Haaretz? What is its mission?

Here, in a remarkable article where Haaretz is begging for money, we find out:

Two years ago our website, Haaretz.com, introduced its subscription-based readership and many thousands of subscribers signed up. They enjoy full access to all Haaretz content. I want to urge you today to join them and purchase a subscription to Haaretz, Israel's leading source for news and opinion.

By doing so, you will become a partner in the ongoing effort to shape Israel as a liberal and constitutional democracy that cherishes the values of pluralism and civil and human rights. You will become a partner in actively supporting the two-state solution and the right to Palestinian self-determination, which will enable Israel to rid itself of the burdens of territorial occupation and the control of another people.

Haaretz, which as far as I can tell has no written code of ethics, has here provided a mission statement that has nothing to do with journalism and everything to do with advocacy.

Whether one supports Haaretz' editorial stance or not, this explicit description of Haaretz as being primarily a political actor should cause anyone to be against supporting it.

Let Haaretz register as an NGO or an Israeli political party, and let it ask for money to support its views. But don't call it a newspaper.

Judging from this article, Haaretz doesn't even define itself that way. It is a newsletter for a political organization, one that is begging for more members.

(h/t Zaba)

Ha'aretz buries a #BDSFail in an anti-Israel report

Here is a perfect example of why Haaretz is a joke. Keep in mind that this piece written by Esther Zandberg is considered a news article, not an editorial.

South Africa during the apartheid era was the only country to be thrown out of the International Union of Architects. Will Israel be the second? This issue is now on the union’s agenda.

Last month, the Royal Institute of British Architects resolved to ask the IUA to expel the Israel Association of United Architects from its ranks until the latter organization expressed opposition to illegal construction in the occupied territories, and took action against those Israeli professionals involved in construction and planning there. RIBA called upon the IAUA to abide by the international union's resolutions from 2005 and 2009, which condemn any act that violates the Fourth Geneva Convention (which protects civilian populations in occupied lands), including construction or development involving ethnic discrimination in illegally conquered territories.

The UIA’s upcoming congress will take place in August in Durban, South Africa, which in itself is quite symbolic. While the UIA’s agencies considered bringing up for a vote at that international event the RIBA demand to ban the Israeli architect's association – the UIA has now decided not to do so. But even if the vote is not taking place, the damage to the IAUA – and perhaps to Israeli architects in general, regardless of their individual political leanings – has been done. The mere threat of expulsion from the UIA, an organization that's more respected than important, constitutes yet another link in the chain of efforts to isolate Israeli society from the community of nations.

Since the call was issued by the British group to ban the Israelis – at the initiative of an organization called Architects and Planners for Justice in Palestine, whose members are active in RIBA – the IAUA's leadership had been working feverishly to thwart the vote, which would have had negative consequences. But, the Israeli association came by this situation honestly: Its insistence on claiming that it is an exclusively professional organization with no political agenda has led it to this point. Its statement that it does not concern itself with political issues, including the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and that each of its members behaves according to his own world view, sounds hollow in the international arena.

The mantra “I personally do not build in the territories” is no longer a solid defense. After all, being apolitical does not mean being neutral; rather, it is tantamount to taking a stance supporting the status quo. Since architecture is a tool through which political policy is implemented, even if not all the members of the IAUA are involved in planning and construction in the territories, the local organization representing them is now being asked to take a moral stance and use the profession as a tool for implementing it – with or without a decision by RIBA or other agencies.

Did you catch the actual news buried in this anti-Israel diatribe?

Here it is again, in the second sentence of the third paragraph:

While the UIA’s agencies considered bringing up for a vote at that international event the RIBA demand to ban the Israeli architect's association – the UIA has now decided not to do so.

RIBA failed to even bring the issue to be on the agenda - let alone to have it be voted upon. The Israel haters utterly failed. But Haaretz cannot stomach such bad news, so they write an entire article as if Israel's architects have been banned or are in imminent danger of being banned.

They are not.

(Haaretz also throws in that Judea and Samaria are "illegally conquered territories." Even if one holds that the occupation is illegal [which is not true either, since occupation is by definition a legal construct] there is no way to say that the West Bank was "illegally conquered," given that Jordan attacked Israel in 1967 and was thus the aggressor.)

(h/t Jonathan)

05/12 Links Pt2: What Is Going on at Vassar College?; BBC omits origin of Israeli Tech

From Ian:

Revisiting Jewish and Islamic Oppression during the Spanish Inquisition

The Spanish Inquisition was a time when considerable horror was visited upon the Jewish people of Spain, which subsequently spread to Portugal, one for which the authorities of both nations wish to make amends, even if in a belatedly tokenistic fashion.
Commentators, such as Robert Fisk, have taken issue with this offer of citizenship. Rather than welcoming the development, and using it to recommend that this legislation be extended to Muslims, it is framed as a pretext to suggest that lack of inclusion for Muslims is in some respect Islamophobic.
Likewise, when word of the plan spread a decade ago, Islamic groups began to demand Spanish citizenship for millions of the Muslim descendants, of the 325,000 expelled by the Spanish authorities in the early 17th Century, despite the fact that expulsion played a central role in the rapid expansion of the Islamic world itself.
"Fisking" history
Notably, Fisk white-washes the Moorish “Golden Age”, in which Jews, Muslims and Christians supposedly lived in a tolerant environment.

The Extremist Allegiances of Joel Beinin

Joel Beinin – Professor of History and of Middle East History at Stanford University – once threatened legal action after being named as a supporter of terrorism. That should have surprised even the most jaded observers of American academic “activism.” Ever since his days as a young Maoist on the campuses of Princeton, Harvard, and then Michigan, Beinin has competed in militancy with the most brutal terrorist foes of the Jewish state.
As a former student recalled, Beinin “had nothing but contempt for Israel, was well to the ‘left’ of the PLO, and was perfectly representative of the extremism of his milieu. One day, at a particular forum, he gave what I can only describe as a kind of beer-hall speech. Shouting and pumping his fist, he admonished the Arabs to forget any negotiating with Israel and to stay true to pure radicalism.”

Mick Jagger’s False Quote Spreads Through Social Media

As the owner of tickets for next month’s Rolling Stones concert in Tel Aviv, I’m very much looking forward to seeing Mick Jagger and the rest of the legendary rock band defying both their age and the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign.
It’s not surprising that Israel advocates are trumpeting the Stones concert as an epic BDS fail, leading to this quote and related images spreading like wildfire through the pro-Israel community on social media.
Unfortunately the quote isn’t true.

From The Malaysian Insider:

Relentless in his attacks against non-Muslims despite a public outcry over controversial remarks made recently, Ikatan Muslimin Malaysia (Isma) president Abdullah Zaik Abdul Rahman is now calling on Malays to fight for their rights or risk losing their Islamic identity in Malaysia to " proxies of capitalist Jewish groups".

In an open letter to the Malays, Abdullah Zaik said it was their collective responsibility to protect Islam and its supreme position in the country.

"Don't allow foreign races to impose their wants on us.

"Leave fear behind and step forward to state your stand, we are duty bound to protect our rights in determining the way forward in this country," he said in a statement.

He also cautioned against what he termed as "games of the enemy", with allegations of racism and extremism and the like.

"They are playing psychological mind games so that the sons of the soil will not rise up to protect their rights," he said.

Isn't it nice to live in a world where we don't have to worry about antisemitism anymore?