About once a month, the New York Times "balances" its usual 9 or 10 anti-Israel op-eds with one that is pro-Israel. Here's
this month's token piece:
On Sept. 26, the Palestinian Authority’s president, Mahmoud Abbas, told the United Nations General Assembly that the Palestinians “keep reaching out to the Israelis saying: let us work to make the culture of peace reign.” Honorable sentiments, to be sure, but sadly not free of hypocrisy.
Just after returning from his U.N. speech, Mr. Abbas cleared time to host the celebrated Egyptian poet Hisham al-Gakh, author of a famous hit proclaiming that “our enemy is the fork-tailed Zionist devil.” That evening, Mr. al-Gakh had an opportunity to recite his “lovely” song upon receiving an award from the Palestinian minister of culture.
And in July, the program “Palestine This Morning” featured two sisters reciting a poem referring to “sons of Zion” and “barbaric monkeys” and “wretched pigs.”
These are but a few of the thousands of examples of Palestinian incitement against the Jewish state and the Jewish people. There are even numerous instances of the glorification of Hitler on the Facebook pages of some government-supported Palestinian schools and in children’s publications funded by the Palestinian Authority. Such messages, propagated daily in P.A. media and classrooms, are internalized by the population at large — and children in particular.
Two decades ago, I was a chartered member of Israel’s Peace Now movement and an unabashed supporter of the peace process. Since then, I — and many Israelis like me — have become deeply skeptical about Palestinians’ real intentions. And it’s not only because of the terrorist attacks which have emanated from areas handed over to Palestinian control, but also because of the repeated Palestinian calls for Israel’s destruction. Jewish history has taught us the hard way never to underestimate the power of hatred.
The Palestinian Authority’s television and radio stations, public schools, summer camps, children’s magazines and Web sites are being used to drive home four core messages. First, that the existence of a Jewish state (regardless of its borders) is illegitimate because there is no Jewish people and no Jewish history in this piece of land. Second, that Jews and Zionists are horrible creatures that corrupt those in their vicinity. Third, that Palestinians must continue to struggle until the inevitable replacement of Israel by an Arab-Palestinian state. And fourth, that all forms of resistance are honorable and valid, even if some forms of violence are not always expedient.
Instead of being schooled in the “culture of peace,” the next generation of Palestinians is being relentlessly fed a rhetorical diet that includes the idolization of terrorists, the demonization of Jews and the conviction that sooner or later Israel should cease to exist.
Even after Secretary of State John Kerry’s announcement of the resumption of peace talks, incitement remains prevalent. For example, P.A. television coverage of a “peace visit” to the West Bank’s Hebron district by the famed FC Barcelona soccer team took the trouble to remind viewers that Palestine extends “from Eilat to Rosh Hanikra” — that is, not just the West Bank and Gaza Strip, but the entire land of Israel. This remark was followed by a song performed by Muhammad Assaf, the winner of the popular TV show “Arab Idol.” The lyrics envisioned the “liberation” of Israeli cities such as Haifa, Tiberias and Safed.
The fact that this anti-Israeli and anti-Semitic indoctrination persists, despite the much-touted relaunch of Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations, constitutes a huge obstacle on the road to peace. It should have disappeared 20 years ago, as a result of a clear Palestinian commitment to end all forms of incitement included in the Oslo Accords. And until it ends, the current round of talks cannot hope to reach a successful outcome.
Progress toward a peace agreement requires that both Palestinians and Israelis foster an environment conducive to productive dialogue. Israel’s anguished decision on July 28 to release over 100 convicted terrorists, as well as to help the Palestinian economy, were a courageous attempt to build trust and improve the atmosphere surrounding the negotiations, and I supported it.
Palestinian leaders must now reciprocate by immediately and fully halting their encouragement and sponsorship of hatred.
If they do not, attempts at renewed diplomacy are doomed to fail, Israelis will become more skeptical about the peace process, and we in the Israeli government will have greater difficulty taking the additional confidence-building steps that we have been considering. Indeed, with each passing day, my colleagues and I will find it more and more problematic to authorize any further release of prisoners.
If Israelis are ever to believe that peace with Palestinians has a chance, the first step Mr. Abbas must take is to swiftly terminate the campaign to delegitimize the Jewish people and its state.
The usual response by the Israel-haters to facts like these is that there is anti-Arab incitement in Israeli media as well, and they can find some cherry-picked examples to make it look like both sides are equally guilty.
However, they - as well as Steinitz, media watchdogs like Palestinian Media Watch and others - are ignoring a key part of the core problem.
It isn't only that there is daily incitement in the PA media. It is that there is
an utter absence of contrary views, not only in PalArab media but in Arabic language media altogether.
It is more difficult to report on something's absence than its presence, but from years of searching through Arabic media, the number of articles that contradict the idea that Jews are devils, or that peace with Israel is desirable, or that Jews have a historic connection to the land, are virtually
nonexistent.
Sometimes there will be an article that acknowledges Jews' scientific accomplishments, usually to contrast with Arab backwardness. Sometimes there might be a nostalgic article about the vanished Jewish community of Egypt, for example. But
never have I seen an Arabic article that supports full peace with Israel that includes normalization.
Never have I seen an article calling on the PA to make compromises for the sake of peace.
Never have I seen an article that says that Talmud is anything but a Jewish supremacist tract.
Never have I seen an article that admits that Jews have emotional and historic ties to Jerusalem or to Israel altogether.
Never have I seen an article that condemns the PA's making terrorists into heroes. Never (except for very rarely in Lebanon) have I seen any Arabic paper call for the naturalization of Palestinians that were born in their countries. In fact, rarely have I even seen a user comment published that would say any of these things.
The Arab world's media has lots of opinions on different topics. They are not all government sponsored any more. But whether the newspaper is pro-Islamist or pro-secular, the idea of real peace with Israel or Jewish history in the Middle East is simply not to be found. It is a classic example of Orwell's groupthink - not only is the idea of true peace impossible to find, it is unthinkable.
Incitement is very bad, and often leads to violence. But
the absence of a contrary viewpoint is even worse.
There is nothing to blunt the hate. There is no marketplace of ideas when it comes to Israel and Jewish nationalism. That is the real story here, and it is one that no one is reporting.
Tuesday, October 15, 2013
Elder of Ziyon
