Hat tip LGF via Solomonia.

In response to some queries on why I haven't written something specifically on the abuse of the Prophet (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam), then that is because:These are the people that scare me - seeming moderates who are against the current violence (like the editor of Arab American News who was on MSNBC tonight) yet when they speak frankly, they are only against the violence because it makes them look bad - but they truly believe that the cartoonists deserve to die for their "crime."
1. Many good people have written enough about it already
2. I feel too ashamed, living in Europe, to write when I know what the Shari'ah demands of us
Let there be no doubt: the crime of belittling the Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam) results in instant death for the Muslim by unanimous opinion of the scholars, and the majority believe it to be the case as well for the Dhimmi and the Musta'man (those who have peace treaties etc) living in the Muslim lands under Islamic Law. That is how serious a crime this is.
As for these Europeans that are reviling the Prophet under their 'law' then we're at a dead end. As these non-Muslims are our own people living under their own law, we are forbidden to do anything that would contravene that law. How shameful for us.
Want to get an inside opinion on how I'm feeling at the moment on this subject? Have a little read of al-Shifa by Qadhi 'Iyadh (r) or if you're feeling really upto it, al-Sarim al-Maslul by Ibn Taymiyyah (r) and then tell me to calm down.
Why do we not have Shari'ah to preserve the Prophet's honour? Where is our Ameer al-Mu'mineen to run and avenge the Prophet (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam)? Where is that strength of the Believers that would make these criminals think twice before they lie under the banner of 'free speech'?
Seeing as we have no Shari'ah and seeing as we have no Leader and seeing as that we're struggling to gather even a motley crew of good enough 'believers' to grace the word 'Islam', then let us put our heads down in shame and humiliation, and let all those who can do something they feel worthwhile, do it.
Let us boycott, let us demonstrate, let us make our feelings known, let us educate, let us show the higher ethic - but let us also realise our individual pathetic state when we know the greatest of creation has been reviled and the criminals walk around smiling, and we just talk the talk and sell more European newspapers.
Wa Allahu Musta'an.
I know I shouldn't have written anything, because I find it difficult with such topics to control anything I write or say (cf the khutbah) descending into uncontrolled emotional rhetoric - so let me stop there and have mercy on my head and let the honourable Shaykh Riyad Nadwi put it a whole lot better than I ever will.
A stereotypical Jewish caricature is shown pointing to an acquiescent President Bush saying "He understands Hebrew, not Arabic."
Uncle Sam is shown cleaning up after the bloody tracks of Israel,
shown as a stereotypical Jewish caricature.
Jewish caricature is writing the "The USA's modern history."
A Jewish caricature writes President Bush's speech. The caption reads "America's attitude towards Gaza's massacre."
A Jewish devil - possibly Ariel Sharon - walks over the skulls of its victims.
The controversial interdict passed on Friday by the Johannesburg High Court, banning the publication of the infamous Danish cartoon strip depicting caricatures of the revered Islamic figure Prophet Mohammed, may be frustrating to the media fraternity but it does well to remind us that most of the rights in the Bill of Rights are not absolute and can – and will – be limited should the need arise.In the real world, it is true that there are limits on freedom of the press from inciting violence. But that is inciting violence against the victims, not by the victims! Cartoons that call for the eradication of Islam could be considered incitement, but these cartoons that are less offensive than even the commentary above in its description of Flemming Rose's motivations.
An obvious example is the limitation of the right to equality in labour practice, where fair discrimination is condoned.
The section within the Bill of Rights granting the right to freedom of expression also expressly limits the right. In other words, the right to freedom of expression is inherently limited even before being limited by other competing rights, such as the right to dignity.
According to the Bill of Rights, the right to freedom of expression, which includes freedom of the press and other media, “does not extend to incitement of imminent violence or advocacy of hatred that is based on race, ethnicity, gender or religion, and that constitutes incitement to cause harm”.
The caricature cartoons, which were commissioned by one Flemming Rose, a supporter of the anti-Islamic Zionist "clash of civilizations" Neo-Cons behind the “war on terror”, were drafted with the intention to insult and outrage Muslims – an aim well achieved.
The surge of violent protests emanating from the Arab world in response to the cartoons is an indication that the publication of the cartoons in South Africa may incite violence from the Muslim community and, because the source intended the cartoons to advocate hatred based on religion, the publication in South Africa could very well constitute “incitement to cause harm”.
A law professor at Wits University has said that although the cartoons did not amount to hate speech, they did amount to an incitement of violence and, as such, limit the press’ right to publish them.
The Media Institute of Southern Africa – a member of the International Freedom of Expression Exchange – has said that the interdict is an “unacceptable intrusion on media freedom and freedom of expression by the courts and believes it is unconstitutional”.
The interdict will be challenged in court by at least one media organisation on 28 February 2006.
Let me step back for a moment to give a little background information that may help you make better sense of what is happening.The deluded author subconsciously reveals the true roots of Muslim rage: it is Muslim impotence.
For a number of years now Western nations have suffered from a growing doubt; they fear that the global hegemony the West has enjoyed for the last couple of centuries is finally coming to an end.
This uncomfortable realization is by no means confined to Westerners; in fact most non-Western people have come to believe this as well.
So a gradual, but perceptible, fading of their global hegemony coupled with a growing fear of an uncertain future motivates Western society to intimidate weak nations in an attempt to keep their power unchallenged and intact.
A US neocon put it very succinctly when he said (I am not quoting exactly): “We must periodically find a weak country, hold it against the wall and slap it around to impress others”.
The ideal target for Westerners has been the Muslim world, due to its extensiveness and perceived weakness.
The current assault on our Prophet by the Danes and other Europeans must be seen within this context.
A woman was murdered and five other people sustained wounds after a Palestinian terrorist of about 20 stabbed Route 51 minibus passengers in the town of Petach Tikva, east of Tel Aviv, Sunday morning.Just waiting for the condemnations pouring in from the Muslim world. Any minute now.
Four of the stab victims are reportedly in serious condition, while another was lightly injured. MDA Director-General Eli Bin said the murder victim, a woman of about 60, sustained numerous stab wounds in her chest and abdomen.
On the murder of an Israeli woman and injuring of five others near Tel Aviv earlier in the day by a Palestinian, the Hamas leader blamed the Israeli occupation.
He said if Israel wanted stability in the region, it should "stop its aggression and start to seriously think about leaving, and for the Palestinians to regain all their rights."
Damascus, (SANA) - Minister of Awqaf or religious Endowments urged the Danish government Thursday to deal with the issue of insulting Prophet Mohammed by Danish newspapers while the Danish ambassador called to open a new page via dialogue....“ This is to put an end to the Zionist lobby that damages ties among peoples … we note that Zionist hands that spread corruption among peoples and nations are behind such seditions,” the minister told the ambassador.And...
TEHRAN, Feb. 3 (MNA) -- The insulting caricatures of Prophet Mohammad (peace be upon him and his household) published by the Danish daily Jyllands-Posten, the Norwegian periodical Magazinet, and the German daily Die Welt have the potential to create a dangerous rift between Islam and the West.Meanwhile, in Lebanon...
Although the Western media have often insulted Islamic sanctities -- an obvious example is the book “The Satanic Verses” by Salman Rushdie – these publications’ recent insults of the prophet of Islam are a new development that had not occurred before.
The simultaneous measures definitely were not an accident. Rather, they are part of a comprehensive plan to confront Islam.
A careful analysis of similar events around the world over the past five years reveals that the U.S. neoconservatives and the Zionist lobby have formulated a plot to influence public opinion in the West so as to foster animosity between Islam and Christianity.
Vice-President of the Higher Islamic Shiite Council Sheikh Abdel-Amir Qabalan has demanded that the journalist responsible for publishing the 12 caricatures in the Danish daily Jyllands-Posten be put on trial.Yup, as always, it is the Jews pulling the strings behind the worldwide conspiracy to insult Islam.
Qabalan was speaking on Friday following a meeting with Danish Ambassador to Syria and Jordan Ole Egberg Mikkelsen who conveyed to the Shiite cleric a letter from Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen that included an apology for the insult made to Prophet Mohammad and Islam.
Qabalan said: "I believe that the person responsible for the caricatures is a Jew or Zionist, because such an insult is the work of a Zionist."
Aside from the large demonstrations today, what sort of reaction did you hear from more moderate Palestinians?The only conclusion one can reach is that when "moderate" Muslims want dialogue with others, it is only to push their agenda, but not to listen to a word that the other side may have to say. For someone to live in the West for a decade and not understand the basics of freedom of speech means that he was not listening.
Surprising anger. We spoke today to Dr. Asad Abu Sharak, a professor of linguistics at Al Azhar University in Gaza. He is considered to be a moderate and belongs to a group that sponsors an interfaith dialog with Christian and Jews, called Sabel.
Sharak said that he believes that this is part of a conspiracy against the Muslim community and “this is a premeditated campaign against the Muslims on the part of the West.”
He says that the publication of these cartoons is causing “a clash of civilizations that it will widen the gap of misunderstanding between the West and the East.”
He said he believed that this was an example of a double standard, that when someone denigrates the Holocaust they throw them in jail. But when someone denigrates the religious figure that Muslims hold most dear, they call it freedom of speech. He believes that the publication of the cartoons is actually a “premeditated crime” against Muslims and that “those people who published those cartoons should be brought to court.”
And this is coming from someone who is considered to be very moderate, but this was his attitude. Sharak lived in Ireland eight years and lived and taught at the University of Michigan for a year.
He doesn’t see this as an isolated incident, but rather as a campaign against Islam, and he was very vehement about that.
Tehran, Feb 1 - Iranian police announced on Tuesday that Israel is behind the smuggling of liquors into Iran.So over 11 months, they confiscated about five cans of beer a week.
"Foot print of Israeli companies and affiliated security organizations is seen in the smuggling of liquors to Iran," said local police commander Colonel Hossein Abdi in an interview with IRNA here on Tuesday.
Abdi said that Israeli companies, backed fully by the smugglers, transit liquors to Iraq via Ibrahim Khalil border and from there to Iran.
He said that Israeli security organizations are in efforts to spread flagrancy and corruption among young generation to harm the Islamic establishment.
He added that the facilities of the companies have been put at the disposal of the smugglers to motivate them to be active in the business.
To support his claim, Abdi said that the detained smugglers have confessed that the companies selling the liquors inside Iraqi territory receive the consignment when it is delivered safely to the destination.
He said since the start of the current Iranian year on March 21, 2005, more than 210 bottles and cans of liquors have been confiscated from smugglers in Mahabad.
Buy EoZ's books!
PROTOCOLS: EXPOSING MODERN ANTISEMITISM
If you want real peace, don't insist on a divided Jerusalem, @USAmbIsrael
The Apartheid charge, the Abraham Accords and the "right side of history"
With Palestinians, there is no need to exaggerate: they really support murdering random Jews
Great news for Yom HaShoah! There are no antisemites!