Thursday, March 05, 2020

By Petra Marquardt-Bigman

  
If you read part 1 of this documentation, you know already that Bernie Sanders surrogate Amer Zahr hates Israel, but got an Israeli passport for himself and regularly visits to perform his “comedic routines” – which presumably include an act on the topic “BDS for thee but not for me.”

Unsurprisingly, it turned out that Zahr is also not particularly honest when he claims that he comes from a family of Palestinian refugees. His maternal grandparents apparently decided to emigrate from Israel to the US; but what about his paternal grandparents – and how come Zahr was born in Jordan?

The relevant story is recounted in a post on Zahr’s website, which – all too predictably – includes some creative re-writing of history. The two sentences that deal with the birth of Zahr’s father are a good example: “In March 1948, George [i.e. Zahr’s father], their first child, was born. […] One month later, Zionist forces (with the support of the British government) took Yafa by military force, forcing tens of thousands of Arabs from the city, including Elias, Salma, and their infant child” [i.e. Zahr’s grandparents, who were Christians, and his father].

Zahr could probably learn a lot about what really happened in Jaffa from the book of his maternal great-grandfather (see Part 1) – though he might not like what his great-grandfather wrote. In any case, Zahr is wrong: “Zionist forces” – which did NOT have “the support of the British government” – didn’t take Jaffa in April 1948, but only on May 13, 1948. Most importantly, however, the “Zionist forces” did NOT force “tens of thousands of Arabs from the city.”

The supposed ethnic cleansing of Jaffa by evil Zionists is a fairly popular myth, but it is well documented that the more affluent Arab residents of Jaffa set an example for the rest of the population by starting to leave the city soon after the United Nations Partition Resolution of November 29, 1947. Jaffa’s poor neighborhoods had been swelled by tens of thousands of migrants since the early 1920s, and many of the local migrants soon decided to return to the villages they had come from, while migrants who were from further away may have tried to get back to wherever they had come from.

More recent research has also shown that tensions between the politically moderate Arab upper- and middle classes in Jaffa and supporters of the militant mufti and Nazi collaborator Amin al-Husseini (whom the French had allowed to escape to Egypt) created chaos in Jaffa – indeed, as Amer Zahr surely knows full well, his own maternal great-grandfather “fled from Jaffa to Ramallah in December 1947” because he feared being assassinated by Husseini’s people. In addition, “violent clashes erupted and tensions ran high between the local population and the Arab Army of Salvation recruited by the Arab League, which consisted of Syrian, Iraqi and other volunteers, if not mercenaries […] Many Arab testimonies […] describe cases in which the foreigners engaged in looting and arbitrary confiscation of merchandise from local Arab shopkeepers.”

The vast majority of Jaffa residents who left the city well before “Zionist forces” took over in mid-May 1948 fled preparations for a war instigated and pursued by an Arab leadership and Arab governments resolved to prevent Israel’s re-establishment with “a war of extermination and momentous massacre.” Already in October 1947, Arab League secretary-general Azzam anticipated that this war would “be an opportunity for vast plunder,” but while he insisted it would be seen “as dignifying every Arab and every Muslim throughout the world,” he also expected “horrible battles.”

In order to avoid getting caught up in these “horrible battles,” Amer Zahr’s grandparents left Jaffa with their newborn son and, as Zahr puts it, “refuged to Amman.” According to Zahr, the family had a “hard life in Amman,” because although “Palestinians were granted citizenship in Jordan, they were and remain second-class citizens. King Hussein constantly cracked down on them, most notably during the fighting of the fall of 1970, dubbed ‘Black September.’ During that time, the Jordanian army killed at least 10,000 Palestinians.”

Zahr apparently hopes that those who have no clue about the “Black September” fighting won’t suspect that it was a result of the reckless conduct of Arafat’s Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO), which used Jordan as a base for a terrorist war against Israel in total disregard for the interests of Jordan’s government and King Hussein.

But it seems that Amer Zahr’s grandparents managed to get through “Black September” unscathed, and after his father George Zahr “graduated from college in Jordan,” he went “to study further in Beirut, and eventually earned a PhD from the University of California-Berkeley, where he married a fellow Palestinian refugee.”

However, Zahr’s mother was not a “refugee,” and it also doesn’t make much sense to describe his father as a “refugee.” It’s true that Zahr’s paternal grandparents had left Jaffa with their newborn son to escape the bloody war that Arab League secretary-general Azzam had anticipated so eagerly, and they may not have intended to settle permanently in Amman. But as Amer Zahr acknowledges, “Palestinians were granted citizenship in Jordan,” i.e. both his grandparents and his father, who grew up in Jordan, presumably had Jordanian citizenship.

Moreover, by the time George Zahr met his future wife during his studies at Berkeley, she was already living in the US for about a decade, and it’s reasonable to assume that she had acquired American citizenship (in addition to her Israeli citizenship). Since George Zahr participated in research “sponsored by the United States Government” at Berkeley, he also might have applied for, or acquired, American citizenship.

After finishing his studies (in chemistry) in 1976, George Zahr was apparently hoping to pursue an academic career, and in 1977, “he returned to Amman and became a professor at the University of Jordan.” Soon afterwards, Amer Zahr was born, but he didn’t get to grow up in Amman, because in 1979, “as a result of an ugly and unjust political episode, George, wildly popular with his students, was fired from his post.  He was exiled from Jordan and found a new life in America.”

Needless to say, Amer Zahr thinks that this made him a “refugee”. As he wrote in a 2001 article entitled “On visiting the place of my birth”:

“While I am Palestinian, my roots in Jordan are deep. After being expelled as a refugee at the age of one month in 1948 as a result of the creation of the state of Israel, my father was raised and attended university in Amman. Amman was his home in exile, and it was also the place of my birth. At the age of three, amid my father’s political “disagreements” with the government of Jordan, I became a refugee and was subsequently raised just outside of Philadelphia, PA (Incidentally, the ancient Roman name for the city of Amman was ‘Philadelphia’). When it comes down to it, my father and his families were expelled from Palestine in 1948 for being Palestinian and expelled from Jordan in 1980 for acting Palestinian.”

But it seems Zahr doesn’t really bear a grudge against Jordan. After all, it’s an Arab country where hatred of the world’s only Jewish state runs deep – which is something that makes Amer Zahr very happy. As he posted in December 2018: “Jumana Ghunaimat, Jordan’s minister of media affairs and communications, stepped on the Israeli flag at a building in Amman. Jumana, that leaves with me with one question: Are you single? #FreePalestine #Palestine #Jordan.”



It’s worthwhile to look at one more version Amer Zahr offers for the “refugee” story of his father. In a post written in May of last year under the title “DON’T MESS WITH PALESTINIANS!”, Zahr pondered the Palestinian “nakba”, i.e. catastrophe, and presented his father as an example for his claim that “this whole Nakba-Naksa-Youm El Ard stuff has actually made us [i.e. Palestinians] stronger.” According to Zahr, Palestinians are now “the hardest working people in the world” and “the smartest people in the world”:

“To illustrate all these points, I’d like to tell you of the case of a particular refugee I know quite well. His name is George Zahr. He was born in Yafa, Palestine in March 1948. At one month old, he became a refugee. He grew up in Jordan, starting his education in UNRWA schools. Then, he finished high school with honors, college with honors, master’s degree with honors, and a doctorate degree in chemistry with honors. As you can see, there’s a theme.
His education got him a professorship, then a well-paying research position in America for thirty-five years. A big house. Nice cars. College-educated kids. That’s the Palestinian story. From nothing to everything.
Education catapulted my dad from a shoeless Palestinian refugee to a spoiled American who owns a triple-control, seven-jet, multi-functional, Bluetooth-enabled, state-of-the-art, voice-activated shower. I love this country.
And it all happened because Israel tried to get rid of him.”

It’s nice to hear that Amer Zahr loves America – which you wouldn’t always know from his social media posts. And it’s of course very nice to hear that his father was so successful in pursuing the American dream. But it didn’t “all happened because Israel tried to get rid of him”: Zahr’s father was born before Israel was established, and his parents fled the preparations for “a war of extermination” that Arab leaders and governments threatened and incited in order to prevent Israel’s re-establishment.

Reading Zahr’s “nakba” post from last year illustrates not only his usual disregard for facts and his seething hatred for Israel, but it also reveals his almost pathological Palestinian nationalism. This is how he concludes his post:

“Remember how I said Israel created 800,000 Palestinian refugees in 1948? Well, that was true. But they didn’t get everyone. About 150,000 Palestinians remained in what is today Israel. Now, if those 150,000 people had increased at the average global population growth rate, today they should number about 350,000-400,000 people. But they’re not 350,000-400,000 people. Nope. They’re 1.8 million people. That’s right, they drop bombs, we drop babies. They have tanks and helicopters, but we have the strongest weapon in the world.
And that population spike is not our fault. When you shut down the roads, deprive us jobs, and confine us to ghettos, there’s a lot of free time to fill. And don’t forget, two thousand years ago, we got a woman pregnant without touching her. What did you think was gonna happen when we started touching each other?
So, I guess my message is this. Don’t push us. Don’t challenge us. We end up as multilingual, super-educated, hyper-reproductive, overachieving marvels.
That’s right. Don’t mess with us Palestinians. If you do, we will outwork you, we will outsmart you, and we will, if necessary, outfuck you too.”

Perhaps Zahr feels he can write like this because people will keep in mind that he’s a comedian and be inclined not to take him too seriously. But when he boasts that “two thousand years ago, we [Palestinians] got a woman pregnant without touching her,” he picks up a recurring theme of his activism that should be taken seriously, because it echoes the long and bloody history of Christian antisemitism.

It’s unclear if Zahr identifies as a Christian because his father was born to Christian parents. Zahr’s mother is Muslim, and it seems that Zahr sometimes performs at events where organizers probably assume that he is Muslim. Most likely, Zahr views religion like he views facts: as something that can be twisted, or ignored altogether, depending on what’s more convenient.

But Zahr’s efforts to use Christianity in order to promote an antisemitic message are quite serious and sustained. At the time of this writing, Zahr’s pinned tweet is from December 2018 and announces: “Merry PALESTINIAN Christmas! Jesus was one of us! Palestine is full of history. Could you be named after a Palestinian? #MerryChristmas #Palestine #FreePalestine #Jesus #JesusIsPalestinian”



The clip featured in the tweet is downright idiotic and leaves you wondering if Amer Zahr is perhaps not particularly bright, or if he just thinks his followers are hopelessly dim.

Zahr starts out claiming that celebrating Christmas means “celebrating the birth of a Palestinian.” He goes on to list figures from the New Testament, including Mary, the mother of Jesus, and tells his viewers that anyone sharing any of the names of these New Testament figures is named after a Palestinian.

It gets even more ridiculous when Zahr asserts: “Jesus fought against occupation and tyranny” – but if that’s what you believe, it’s obvious that Jesus would have fought against the Roman occupation of his ancestral Jewish homeland. When the Romans executed Jesus, they mocked him as “King of the Jews”; and it was of course the Romans who eventually “exiled the majority of the Jewish people and renamed Judea ‘Palestina’. To be clear, ‘Syria Palestine’ officially became a Roman province about a century after Jesus’ crucifixion. The idea was to erase the Jewish presence from Judea and to designate their homeland with reference to their Biblical enemies”,  i.e. the Aegean people (from what is now Greece) called “Philistines”/ “Plishtim.” The “Philistines” had disappeared centuries earlier, but the Roman renaming of the Jewish homeland was obviously intended as “a last humiliation.”

The Jew-haters of today may enjoy it when people like Zahr try to re-enact the Roman humiliation of the Jews, and Zahr is only too happy to promote antisemitic Palestinian propaganda by abusing Christian holidays for his “Jesus was a Palestinian” nonsense.  


But while the kind of Palestinian propaganda promoted by Zahr might seem ridiculous, it shouldn’t be ignored that it reflects the roots of Christian antisemitism. As the eminent scholar Walter Russell Mead has emphasized, some of the writings in the Christian New Testament illustrate that it was considered “extremely important that Jesus was a Jew and that the story of Jesus is part of the story of God’s encounter with the Jewish people.” However, “Christians going back to the first century AD have often wished this wasn’t so. In ancient times, various Greek and Roman cults grew up that detached the figure of Jesus from this Jewish context […] More recently, the Nazis in particular hated the idea of Jesus being a Jew, and some of them went so far as to invent an “Aryan Christianity” with an Aryan Christ. The Nazis were picking up on a kind of anti-Semitism that flourished in the first and second centuries after Christ as theological writers like Marcion argued that the Jewish God of the Old Testament had nothing to do with the much higher, more noble, and philosophically acceptable deity proclaimed by Jesus.”

One of the links Mead provides leads to a book on “The Aryan Jesus: Christian Theologians and the Bible in Nazi Germany,” which seems sadly relevant for Palestinian efforts to “dejudaize” Jesus. Here is the introductory paragraph: 



The Palestinian need to deny that Jesus was a Jew is of course rooted in the refusal to acknowledge that the Jews are indigenous to today’s Israel and the historic areas of Judea and Samaria; needless to say, this also includes the denial of the fact that Jerusalem became a holy city for Christians and Muslims because the Temple Mount had first been – and remains – Judaism’s holiest site.

Putative “progressives” like Bernie Sanders surrogate Amer Zahr would never even dream of denying the history of indigenous people anywhere – except for the Jews. Zahr may be a comedian, but there’s nothing funny about the endless lies and fabrications he comes up with in order to demonize the world’s only Jewish state.





We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
  • Thursday, March 05, 2020
  • Elder of Ziyon


On Wednesday, jared Kushner gave a presentation to the House Foreign Affairs Committee on the administration's "Peace to Prosperity" plan.

According to Barak Ravid as reported by Axios, he showed the same Powerpoint presentation that he showed the UN Security Council last month.

The main point that Kushner pushed is that the status quo does not incentivize either Israel or the Palestinians to take any risks.

Here it is:




Interestingly, Kushner's argument was anti-settlement. A White House official was quoted, “Kushner’s message was that every time negotiations failed, the Palestinians got more money and Israel was able to keep expanding the settlements, but the peace process became a false notion and didn’t solve anything. Both parties' leaderships just kept getting what they want without improving the lives of the people."

Kushner told the committee that the plan was still quite alive. he said that there were several positive statements about the plan from Arab countries, that the EU was not united in opposition to the plan, and that the Palestinians push against the plan stalled at the UN when they tried and failed to create a Security Council resolution.





We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
  • Thursday, March 05, 2020
  • Elder of Ziyon
A 175-page lawsuit was reportedly filed in District Court, District of Columbia with the fascinating title of

COMPLAINT FOR AIDING AND ABETTING (1) THE DENATIONALIZATION AND
DEHUMANIZATION OF THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE, (2) THE INSTALLATION OF
AN APARTHEID REGIME IN THE OPT, AND (3) AND (4) SECURING AWARDS OF
DECLARATORY RELIEF THAT THE ISRAELI CITIZEN KNOWN AS MR.
NETANYAHU IS A WAR CRIMINAL AND THAT THE ISSUE OF THE LAND
TRANSFER COMPONENT OF DEFENDANT KUSHNER’S PEACE PLAN SHOULD
BE REFERED TO THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY. 

Plaintiffs include Ahed and Bassam Tamimi, the Dawabshe family, and a number of people whose names I don't recognize but who are supposedly Palestinians or Palestinian Americans.

The defendants include Donald Trump, Bibi Netanyahu, Andrew Cuomo, Miriam Adelson, AIPAC, David Friedman, Jared Kushner, Newt Gingrich, Rudolph Giuliani, Mike Huckabee and more.

The text looks more like a manifesto of a mass murderer than a real legal document. It is filled with completely nutty assertions, antisemitic allegations, and fantasies.

The antisemitism is clear. Some 15 times it accuses Israel of poisoning Palestinian water wells and livestock, an echo of one of the original blood libels.

Here is one of the introductory paragraphs that contain nothing but fantasies:

The war crimes inflicted on the Palestinian civilian population were necessary because the Zionist Organization of America (herein after ZOA) mandated in 1898 that the country of Palestine would be the location of the new Jewish homeland. Consistent with that mandate, PMN (Netanyahu) and former PM Sharon decided forty years ago that Palestinians had to become a denationalized, dehumanized, and an irrelevant population if Ben-Gurion’s vision of a sterile Jewish state was to be established in Palestine. The World Zionist platform (removal of all non-Jews from Palestine) dictated that Israel’s founding father, Ben-Gurion (1948)- “must take over all of Palestine,” as confirmed by former PM Golda Meir- “We must destroy any vestige of the Palestinian culture.” To accomplish these objectives, PMN gave a green light to his local guerilla army, i.e. settlement militia units, to maim and murder Palestinians, destroy their olive groves and their livestock, and steal their private property.
We learn, for example, that Jared Kushner is Netanyahu's adopted son.

Netanyahu changed the name of the "Israeli Army" to the "Israel Defense Forces" to make the world believe that it was meant for defense.

The main aim of AIPAC is to expel all Palestinians from the territories.

Trump planned to "defund the UN before being inaugurated so he could deprive Palestinians of any foreign aid and deny them healthcare, i.e. genocide."

This story is especially idiotic and antisemitic:

In 1998, at the height of the Tiananem Square demonstrations, PMN wanted to remove approximately 50,000 non-Jews from the OPT, thinking the world’s focus would be elsewhere, which it was. He concluded that if Israeli leadership could not get rid of the Palestinians, he must exterminate them, much like the Nazi regime concluded with respect to the Warsaw Jewish population, i.e. the final solution. He knew he needed some major financial support to make this happen, so he assembled a group of zealous, wealthy Americans, a representative sample being the Defendants named herein. He also needed a propaganda campaign machine, enter AIPAC. He needed massive off the books funding, enter Adelson and Kushner families and phony 501(c)(3)s. He needed a core group of vile, disgusting individuals who would do his dirty work and that of the Adelson family, i.e. settlers from Brooklyn. They never owned property before, and they took advantage of the situation in the OPT. They basically proclaimed that Jesus gave them this property, and told a BBC work crew, “this is our land, get the fuck out of here.” 
The lawyer,  Martin McMahon, who seemingly drafted this stream of consciousness drivel, has done stunts like this before.

The Jewish Press also has an article about this absurd suit with more background.






We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
 Vic Rosenthal's Weekly Column

Rutgers professor Jasbir Puar has been invited to speak at Scripps College in California by its chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine and several of the college’s academic departments.

Puar is one of the most vicious antisemites and misozionists* in America. You can read excerpts from a 2016 speech she made at Vassar University to get an idea of her creative presentation of medieval blood libels in a more modern form. She is also a prolific “scholar,” casting her poisonous inventions in the form of just barely penetrable academic jargon (if you think you are capable of understanding her, see how long you can listen to this video).

Among other things, she accuses the IDF of deliberately stunting, maiming, and creating disabilities among Palestinians, in order to suppress their resistance. We would kill them, she argues, but then we would damage our claim to be the primary victims of genocide in history. And when we do kill them, we take their organs for scientific research. Of course she claims that we specialize in hurting Palestinian children – how can she reprise the story of Simon of Trent if she doesn’t accuse us of victimizing children?

The truth of the matter is that the IDF does its best to avoid any collateral damage, that the Palestinians employ child soldiers, and that Palestinian terrorism (the Ma’alot Massacre, the Coastal Road Massacre, the bombings of the Dolphinarium and the Sbarro Pizza restaurant for just a few) does disproportionately target children. But never mind.

Puar is inventive, and finds ways to turn what others believe to be moral behavior into examples of Israeli depravity. “Pinkwashing,” the supposed tactic of contrasting Israel’s tolerance of homosexuals with Arab and Muslim homophobia (which often rises to the level of murder) in order to “whitewash the occupation” is a favorite subject.

She also argues that Israel’s attempts to reduce collateral damage while at the same time defending herself against terrorism and rocket attacks actually constitute a deliberate policy to maim rather than kill Palestinians. The “knock on the roof” technique used in recent mini-wars when a structure in Gaza was about to be bombed is presented as merely a pretense at reducing casualties (she falsely claims the time between the knock and the destruction of a building is only 60 seconds, when it is typically closer to 15 minutes). According to Puar, phone calls warning residents of coming attacks are a form of psychological warfare “a reminder of how powerless they are,” and not a practical way of reducing civilian injuries and deaths.

Nonlethal methods to control riots, deter incursions across the Gaza border, and stop attempts to damage the security barrier are described by Puar as methods of torturing Palestinians or inducing permanent disability, instead of attempts to protect Israelis without killing their attackers. She believes we want to break their spirit, but keep them alive so we can exploit them economically. And we just plain enjoy hurting them.

Her obsessive attribution of the most evil motives imaginable to every action of Israelis to protect themselves against an enemy which, after all, wants to kill them, tries to do so on a regular basis, and often succeeds, is disconnected from reality – I would use the word fanatical. She advocates both BDS and “armed resistance.”

Puar’s fantastic anti-Israel polemic is interwoven with and connected to her discussion of sex, gender, “queer theory,” race, disability, and other topics characteristic of today’s post-modern academic milieu. She seems to have invented the concept of “homonationalism,” which explicates “how homosexuality – and in particular homonormativity, the adoption of heteronormative values by the ‘queer’ community – is instrumentalised as part of nationalist and geopolitical interventions.”

Why do I care?

Because there has never been a better contemporary example than Jasbir Puar of the distortion of the academic mission to find and teach the truth since that great fraud, Edward Said. I say this even though there has been a Ward Churchill and a Steven Salaita. Unlike the latter two, she is an academic star. She is a full Professor, and Graduate Director of Women’s and Gender Studies at Rutgers University, where she has taught since 2000. She holds graduate degrees in Ethnic and Women’s studies, and has a massive list of publications (although most are in marginal journals), speaking engagements, fellowships, and other academic honors. She has had three books published by Duke University Press, which has a disturbing record of anti-Israel bias.

And despite her reality-distorting obsession, she is welcomed to speak at places like Scripps College. She continues to receive grants and fellowships (although some of them, like the “Palestinian American Research Council Fellowship” she got in 2018 may simply constitute payment for her political activity). She is a tenured member of the Rutgers faculty.

The fact is that the Western academic world – particularly the portion of it called “Ethnic and Gender Studies” –  is so thoroughly indoctrinated with misoziony that it doesn’t see anything wrong with her ideas. What look to me like conspiratorial fantasies indicative of mental illness appear as perfectly normal academic discourse to them. This seems to be the case in most universities in the US, the UK and Canada – and to some extent, in certain institutions even in Israel.

Apparently the Scripps people think that her ideas are important and should be heard. But I am guessing that if a pro-Israel group of students wished to invite someone like me to discuss Palestinian terrorism against Israeli children (see, for example, this unrepentant murderess), I am certain that there would be no such event.

Part of the problem (at least outside of Israel) is that for years Arab countries (and Iran, too) have donated large sums of money to academic institutions, have made grants to individual academics, and have built up specific departments (usually Middle East Studies) in key colleges and universities. Combined with the traditional left-wing orientation of many academics, and the strong commitment in academia to “free speech” and “academic freedom” – as long as said speech or freedom is aimed in the proper direction – this has created an atmosphere in which Jasbir Puar is not considered an extremist.

The universities and colleges are supposed to be beacons of light, which support humanist ideals of justice and fairness for all peoples. Instead, they have taken the easy, convenient, profitable, and cowardly path of joining the dark forces of Jew hatred and misoziony, while preening themselves for promoting “social justice.”

_______________________
Misoziony (pronounced mis-OZ-yoni) is the extreme, irrational, and obsessive hatred of the Jewish state. It is antisemitism raised to one degree of abstraction. Although it is not identical to antisemitism, most misozionists also hate Jews as individuals and the Jewish people as a group.




We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.

Wednesday, March 04, 2020

From Ian:

Anti-Israel HRW accepts Saudi funds to not criticize repression of gays
The Executive Director of Human Rights Watch (HRW), Ken Roth, accepted a major donation from a Saudi real estate tycoon by promising not to support advocacy of the LGBT community in the Middle East and North Africa.

The Intercept first reported Monday on the quid pro quo between Roth, who has gained a reputation for strident attacks against Israel, and Saudi billionaire Mohamed Bin Issa al-Jaber.

“Human Rights Watch [HRW] accepted a sizable donation from a Saudi billionaire shortly after its researchers documented labor abuses at one of the man’s companies, a potential violation of the rights group’s own fund-raising guidance,” wrote The Intercept’s Alex Emmons.

“In 2012, Roth signed a memorandum of understanding with al-Jaber containing language that said the gift could not be used for LGBT rights work in the region. He was later pictured next to Jaber at a 2013 ceremony to memorialize the funding,” the self-described online “adversarial journalism” site wrote.

“The controversial donation is at the center of a contentious internal debate about the judgment and leadership of Human Rights Watch executive director Kenneth Roth,” wrote The Intercept.

“The 2012 grant from al-Jaber’s UK-based charitable foundation amounted to $470,000,” the news site said.

The Jerusalem Post can report that last year Roth praised Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in a tweet, after he defended his regime’s execution of gays.


BBC ignores HRW’s dodgy donation
As regular readers are no doubt aware, the BBC is usually very quick off the mark when it comes to providing amplification for reports, campaigns or talking points promoted by the political NGO ‘Human Rights Watch’ (HRW).

Nevertheless, we have yet to find any BBC coverage (including on its website’s ‘human rights’ page) of a recent story concerning that organisation.

On February 27th HRW put out a “Statement on Return of Donation” which opens:

“In 2012, Human Rights Watch made a deeply regrettable decision to accept a donation that included conditions that the funds not be used to support HRW’s work on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights in the Middle East and North Africa. We also regret that the grant was made by the owner of a company that Human Rights Watch had previously identified as complicit in labor rights abuse. This decision stood in stark contrast to our core values and our longstanding commitment to LGBT rights as an integral part of human rights. Accepting a grant with such a condition was anathema to HRW’s commitment to protecting the human rights of all people.”

  • Wednesday, March 04, 2020
  • Elder of Ziyon

Mondoweiss has another wonderful article about Israel, this time about how Israel is selling water technology to the UK.

While the hate site is trying hard to say this is a bad thing, it shows how advanced Israel is and how many nations are clamoring to buy technology from Israel to make their water supplies safer and more efficient.

The article tries mightily to make all Israeli companies seem somehow evil:
Mapal (‘waterfall’ in Hebrew) Green Energy started at Kibbutz Yagur, still its head office, on land once owned by the Palestinian village of Yajur....Founded in 2008, Mapal uses a ‘patented’ method of treating sewage so it can be reused called Floating Fine Bubble Aeration (FFBA). As the Jerusalem Post, for instance, states Mapal ‘developed a diffuser that stays on the surface of the water and shoots air bubbles down into the pool, which is much more effective’. When Mapal entered the UK water market in 2013 its first customer was Anglian Water, a major supplier. Since then, two other  major suppliers, United Utilities and Thames Water, also installed FFBA. According to the Times of Israel “Mapal Green Energy’s Israeli-made aeration recycling system now serves some 30 million Britons.”
It should be mentioned that the author, Mark Govier, lives on usurped Aborigine lands of Australia.

Amiad (‘my nation forever’ in Hebrew) Water Systems [is] located in Kibbutz Amiad. It ‘was built after 1948 on the ruins of the Palestinian Bedouin village of Jib Yusuf’. Amiad manufactures products like hydraulic irrigation filters, and wholly owns its UK subsidiary, Amiad Water Systems (UK).

Amiad’s... big enough to justify listing on the London Stock Exchange where it states, “Amiad provides cost-effective ‘green’ solutions for the irrigation and industrial purposes … for filtration and water treatment, micro irrigation and membrane protection, wastewater and potable water treatment…” Naturally, not a word about Jib Yusuf. 
Philip Weiss, co-founder of Mondoweiss, lives in Putnam County, NY, on land usurped from Lenape and Wappinger tribes. Yet his website doesn't mention that fact a single time!

Arad Metering Services “designs, develops, manufactures, sells and supports its cutting-edge water meters to residential, bulk, irrigation and water management companies around the world’.  As to its history, Arad Ltd was founded in Palestine in 1941, and is based within what is now the ‘UNESCO biosphere reserve’ of Ramot Menashe. In The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited, Israeli historian Benny Morris explained Ramot Menashe is close to Daliyat al-Rawha’, a depopulated Palestinian village.
Whoa - it bought a company that was close to the spot of a former Palestinian village? That's got to be a war crime!

Adam Horowitz, the other co-founder of Mondoweiss, lives in Decatur, GA, on land stolen from the Muskogee tribe. Yet this fact is not mentioned on Mondoweiss at all, let alone on each of the many thousands of articles that Horowitz has written or co-written!

We should insist that every author of every Mondoweiss article mentions the name of the specific village or tribe that they live on top of,  in every single article, which seems to be the standard Mondoweiss holds Israeli people and companies to.

Govier claims that the reason that the UK doesn't actively publicize these Israeli companies is because "the UK water business is eager to avoid negative publicity." Actually, there is no secret here. The reason that the companies' origins aren't trumpeted is because everyone knows that the Israel haters will harass anyone with any connection to Israel and they don't want to bother with dealing with these Israel-hating fanatics.

But, as Govier notes, these companies (and others he mentions) are prominently featured in English-language Israeli media. No one is hiding anything.

Govier and Mondoweiss are just trying to start a harassment campaign, posting the contact information of these companies. They know they have some truly unhinged readers who will start to call in death threats. How wonderfully woke they are.

And it isn't the first time- he has written previously on the connections of Australia with Israeli water companies as well, and no one cared then either.




We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
  • Wednesday, March 04, 2020
  • Elder of Ziyon


This article has been published in a few Iraqi news sites.
Annually, on the anniversary of the “Holocaust” imagined by the Jews of the Caspian Sea in occupied Palestine, the leaders of Israel's terrorist perpetrators stand and chant a clear message to Germany that “we will not forget and we will not forgive”, and they thus threaten Germany to continue blackmail and pressure it to pay unlimited compensation to the perpetrator of Israel, and this is another type of terrorism, organized state terrorism, through which they managed to win Germany in their favor.

These Khazars do not want to reveal the fact that Hitler, the Nazi, was one of the first Europeans to decide to get rid of Jews for their corruption, and to give them Palestine as a national homeland for them - not out of love for them, nor hatred of the Palestinians, but the European desire was urgent to get rid of them after their continuous treachery and dirty plots against he Christian West, as the reformer Martin Luther wrote.

These Khazars entered into an agreement with the Nazi Hitler to allow their youth to emigrate to Palestine to build the Zionist sustainable land there, and to give him the right to dispose of the  Jewish elderly how he wanted, and the deal took place.

When the Khazars in Palestine decided to open the imagined “Holocaust” story, they issued a statement in which they said that the Nazis killed 40 million Jews, but the world knew that the number of Jews at that time was not even close to that, so they promised a review and issued a second statement, they said that there were 24 million victims. The world did not accept this claim either, so they promised a second review in which they said that after research, they found that the victims of the Nazi Jews were only six million, stressing that they would not budge from this number.

Perhaps it was absent in the minds of these greedy moneylenders that during the war Hitler did not target Jews only - and that those who targeted them as Jews were victims of Zionism first - but rather Nazi victims were from many European, German, Russian, Roma, and Arab nationalities, but no one spoke of these victims, and the theater was open to Jewish slag to reap the way it wanted.

As for us Arabs who have been plagued by the fire of Zionism and lost many, we repeat the saying “We will not forget and we will not forgive” many times in every moment, and the day will come when we take revenge for our dignity, and teach the Zionists a lesson that will not be forgotten by those who will remain alive.

The signs of this approaching day are joyful and encouraging. Here is Jordan, and after discovering the truth of the enemy brothers in the Arabian Peninsula, the leadership and people are revolting, and His Majesty King Abdullah II Bin Al-Hussein is planning a new path. We hope his next step is to cancel the gas agreement, and after that the Wadi Araba treaty [peace with Israel] canceled, then we will officially announce that the hour for the account of the Khazar Jews in the occupied Palestine is approaching.
So the Holocaust was a hoax and it is past time to kill and exile all the Jews in the Middle East.

As usual, not a word of protest or dissent when articles like this appear in Arab media.



We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
From Ian:

Ruthie Blum: Is Netanyahu’s Significant Victory Sufficient?
Which brings us to the importance of the election results, and the reason that Netanyahu and his supporters were celebrating on Monday night with confetti and all.

This election constituted a defeat of the “anybody but Bibi” hysteria. It represented a win for the sane center-right that believes in Netanyahu’s handling of domestic and foreign affairs, and strongly opposes the tyranny of the courts. It also illustrated that Israelis care about ideas and actions, and that they are not as swayed by empty slogans and outrageous assertions as certain politicians seem to imagine.

Take Gantz, for example, who has spent his campaign trying to out-Bibi on the one hand and accuse him — appallingly — of behaving like Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan on the other. You know, the same Erdoğan who jails anyone who disagrees with him, including judges, lawyers, academics, and more journalists than any other autocrat or dictator in the world.

As all Israelis know, the only person in danger of getting locked up for his political views is Netanyahu himself. But never mind; the fact that he dares to criticize the police and Supreme Court is enough to stick him with the egregious label.

The good news is that Netanyahu is still Israel’s prime minister and likely to remain so in the foreseeable future. The bad news is that the makeup of the next government, if one is established without the need for a fourth election, could take weeks and be less than satisfactory to an electorate eager to move on.
Jonathan S. Tobin: Three Israeli elections reconfirm two basic facts
It took Israeli politics nearly a year to get back to square one.

That’s the basic fact to understand about the third round of general voting held within a year. While Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is right to claim the vote as a personal victory, it is only by comparison to his near defeat last September that it can be viewed as a great triumph. Israel’s crazy political system may have exhausted and infuriated its citizens, but the three contests held in this period changed very little about the way the country is governed.

As was the case before the first vote, Netanyahu is still the country’s most popular politician, though arguments can be made that no one under indictment should stay in power, even if the charges against him are questionable. And yet, a critical mass of Israeli voters doesn’t agree, let alone buy the claim that Netanyahu is a threat to democracy or the rule of law. Though it shouldn’t have taken three elections to clarify that point, when Netanyahu goes, it will be either of his own volition (something that he doesn’t seem to contemplate in the foreseeable future) or because the judicial system takes him down. As long as his fate is in the hands of the voters, he will remain prime minister.

The other main conclusion concerns policy, and it is one that many commentators are ignoring. Though the rest of the world, including some of those running for president of the United States, still advocates for Israel to make dangerous concessions to the Palestinians for peace, the vast majority of Israelis have more or less stopped discussing the issue. Even if many Americans refuse to accept reality, a broad consensus on the lack of a peace partner encompasses not only Netanyahu’s right-wing/religious bloc, but also the Blue and White Party, which campaigned on stands virtually identical to those of the prime minister.

These are two basic facts about the country that its foreign friends, and especially its critics, should take to heart.
With 99% of votes counted, right-wing bloc slips to 58 seats, 3 shy of majority
As votes cast in so-called double envelopes in the Knesset elections were being tallied, the Central Election Committee updated the count Wednesday morning, giving Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party and the centrist rival Blue and White led by Benny Gantz an extra seat apiece, leaving the premier’s bloc of right-wing supporters at 58 seats.

After 99% of the votes were tallied, Likud gained a seat for a total of 36, with the rival Blue and White party also increasing its power from 32 to 33.

The Joint List of predominantly Arab parties dropped from 16 seats to 15, while the ultra-Orthodox Shas party dropped from 10 seats to 9.

The rest of the parties’ seat totals remained the same: seven for United Torah Judaism (UTJ), seven for Yisrael Beytenu, seven for Labor-Gesher-Meretz and six for Yamina.

Based on those seat totals, Likud and its allies would have 58 seats combined. The right-wing religious bloc supporting Netanyahu — consisting of Likud, Shas, UTJ and Yamina — though, falls short of the 61 seats needed to form a government.

The counting of the “double envelope” ballots of soldiers, police staff, diplomats, handicapped citizens, hospital patients and staff, and prisoners began overnight and was expected to conclude later in the day.

  • Wednesday, March 04, 2020
  • Elder of Ziyon

A Lebanese man of Palestinian descent who lives in Montreal claims that he will manufacture an all-electric supercar using Palestinian labor, to be available in the next few years.

Jihad Mohammed started the Electra car company, it seems, around 2018. He introduced some computer simulated models of his planned car, the Quds EE.



According to the website, the Quds EE can accelerate from 0-99 kmh in 2.8 seconds and can go over 800 km between charges - significantly more than any electric vehicle on the market today.

Mohammed tells Arab media that the Quds name is an inherent part of the car, and he will refuse to honor the warranty of anyone who removes that name from the car.

The front of the car has a representation of the Dome of the Rock, which the company claims also helps charge the battery somehow - solar or wind, it wasn't clear.

Besides Jihad, the Electra company appears to have two employees - a designer, who had no previous experience designing cars, and a virtualization engineer who is creating these pictures of the car.

Mohammed himself has an "investment company" with an empty website.

Today, you can pre-order one of these entirely fictional cars. Just choose the colors of the exterior and interior, and based on the flimsy information given at the website, you can send a down payment of anywhere from $1,000 to the $70,000 estimated price of the car, to be sent via wire transfer or PayPal, and kiss your money goodbye.





We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
  • Wednesday, March 04, 2020
  • Elder of Ziyon
PLO Executive Committee member Hanan Ashrawi, head of the Miftah NGO that even today has pro-terror and antisemitic articles like "Jews poison Palestinian wells" and "Jews steal organs of children", is calling Israelis racist.

"The results of the Israeli elections were a clear expression of the spread of a culture of hatred, racism and extremism in Israel," she was paraphrased as saying by Palestinian media.

But she's not the only hypocrite who suddenly pretends to care about racism. A leader of the Islamic Jihad terror group likewise called Israelis racist. Dr. Muhammad al-Hindi, a member of the Political Bureau of Islamic Jihad, said that "racism is rampant in the state of the Zionist entity, where everyone is racing to annex the West Bank and brag about the numbers of martyrs they kill."

Projection much?

Saeb Erekat said, "Netanyahu chose to perpetuate the pillars of the conflict and the spiral of violence, extremism, chaos and bloodshed, and thus requires that the region and its peoples live with the sword."

Again, projection much?

The PFLP said, "The election results are a clear expression of the racist Zionist society."

It is interesting how much these terrorists, Jew-haters and inciters of terror sound exactly like the "progressive" groups when talking about Israel. Their talking points are pretty much identical.





We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
  • Wednesday, March 04, 2020
  • Elder of Ziyon
Alison Mortell, the Deputy National Analytics Director for Bernie Sanders according to her Twitetr bio, has tweeted this joke:


Isn't the concept of a place for Jews to be safe from slaughter hilarious?

Mortell doesn't like the idea of a Jewish state. 

This thread shows how utterly uninformed she is- and she even justifies Palestinian terror.




 Mortell claims she is against any "ethnostate" but she only seems to care about the existence of the one that happens to be Jewish.

Can anyone find a single person working on the Sanders campaign that agrees with Sanders saying that he supports Israel's existence? Because every single person we are aware of that is working for him is against the existence of a Jewish state altogether.

And Bernie doesn't even try to tell them otherwise.





We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.

Tuesday, March 03, 2020

From Ian:

JPost Editorial: The bad faith behind ‘Free Palestine’
Today, enemies of the Jewish state use language to indicate Israel should cease to exist. A logical question ensues when calling to “Free Palestine” – what will be of the Jews once “Palestine” is freed? Three options emerge: 1) Israel becomes an Arab country and Jews once again take their historic place in Arab lands as dhimmis (second-class citizens), 2) all Jews will be exiled from Israel or 3) a war will be waged against Israel by her enemies with the goal to eliminate all Jews from the land.

There are real-world consequences to this type of deceptive language. A war is not fantasy. The Palestinian Authority regularly incites violence against the Jewish state. Its arch rival, the terror group Hamas, whose stated goal is the destruction of Israel, is responsible for launching thousands of rockets into Israel from Gaza. More than 1,350 innocent Israeli lives have been taken by Palestinian terrorists since 2000. Iran repeatedly calls for the destruction of Israel, and the leader of the terrorist group Hezbollah stated that it would be easier if all of the Jews moved to “occupied Palestine” in order to be chased down for the “final and decisive battle.”

For anyone truly preoccupied with human rights, all three options, with varying intensity, leave Jews in a dangerous predicament all too familiar.

As this year’s high school seniors prepare to enter college, it’s vital they learn about slogans used to vilify Israel – such as “Free Palestine” – and how to counter them. In Club Z, we expose students to the language antisemitic activists use to demonize Israel. Our teens gain the tools they need to combat antisemitic activism and stand up for the Jewish state before they arrive on college campuses. It is critical that the next generation of proud and proactive Zionist leaders are adequately prepared to fight – and ultimately defeat – the PR battle waged against the Jewish state.
Islam, Global Muslim Jew-Hatred, And Failed Jewish “Leadership”
Today, the grotesque myth of Islamic tolerance of Jews, in particular, persists, even as we are in the midst of a global pandemic of Muslim Antisemitism and Anti-Jewish violence. This violent hatred is driven by the same unreformed and unrepentant canonical Islamic themes Perlmann described in the 1940s—which date to the advent of Islam—as promulgated, now, by Islam’s most authoritative religious teaching institutions, Sunni and Shiite alike.

Analyses from the ADL published between 2014 to Nov. 21, 2019, which determined the prevalence (occurrence) of “extreme antisemitism”—i.e., agreement with at least 6/11 antisemitic stereotypes, have demonstrated:
- The 16 most Antisemitic countries in the world are all in the Muslim Middle East, where extreme Antisemitism has a 74 to 93% prevalence.
- Extreme Antisemitism is 50-55% prevalent among Western European Muslims, i.e., ~3-fold the rate of Western European Christians, or non-Muslims overall.
- Extreme Antisemitism in the U.S., a much more philosemitic country, has a 34% prevalence among Muslims, 2.4-fold the 14% rate in non-Muslims

This excess of Muslim Jew-hatred is accompanied not only by endless jihad violence against Israeli Jews (450-500 thwarted attacks per year in 2018, and 2019; additionally, thousands of rocket barrages), but 3- to 10-fold increased rates of anti-Jewish violence, or violent threats, against Western European Jews, by Muslims, relative to violence from the Left, or Right, and 23 Muslim jihadist attacks against American Jews since 9/11, 16 of which were thwarted, thankfully, but 7 that were completed, resulting in 8 deaths and 8 serious injuries—the most recent being Muslim convert Grafton Thomas’s attack on a Monsey, New York synagogue, December 28, 2019, during a Chanukah candle lighting ceremony.

Current Al-Azhar University Grand Imam, and Sunni Muslim Papal equivalent, Ahmad al-Tayeb, during an October, 2013 interview, re-affirmed, authoritatively, the canonical Islamic animus which fuels this global orgy of Muslim Jew-hatred, and violence. Riveting on Koran 5:82, al-Tayeb stated brazenly:

A verse in the Koran explains the Muslims’ relations with the Jews…See how we suffer today from global Zionism and Judaism…Since the inception of Islam 1,400 years ago, we have been suffering from Jewish and Zionist interference in Muslim affairs. The Koran (5:82) said it and history has proven it: ‘You shall find the strongest among men in enmity to the believers to be the Jews…’
Noah Rothman: Whitewashing the Reds
Perhaps the guiltiest of perpetrators, in Lowry’s estimation, is the “simple passage of time.” The Millennial and post-Millennial generations were “never exposed to the threats of the Soviet Union,” she writes. They have no first-hand knowledge of how state-run industry affects prices and quality of service. They’ve only heard about the refugee crises that punctuated the Communist epoch second-hand, if they heard about them at all. They never experienced an air-raid drill, never read dissidents or met a Refusenik, and never participated in a black economy that wasn’t built up around the trade in illicit narcotics. For these voters, the Cold War is an academic concept.

What younger voters do know more intimately, Lowry observes, are conditions like “yawning inequality, heavy debt burdens, obscene costs of living, and stagnant wages.” And as these voters have become more favorable toward redistributionist politics, they’ve gravitated toward the “worker-centered” policies of Bernie Sanders, which are tempered by his “consistent” “opposition to totalitarianism and autocracy and street violence.” After all, “the guy has always been clear that he wants the United States to become more like Denmark, not Cuba.” That’s the kind of clarity afforded only to those committed to pretending Sanders’s career in the public eye began in 2015.

It’s difficult to think of a similar example of ignorance that would be waved off with such insouciance. Would American voters with no first-hand memory of the Holocaust be forgiven for drifting into the arms of neo-Nazi movements? Are younger Americans no longer expected to maintain some understanding of America’s experience with slavery and Jim Crow laws? Should we withhold judgment on Americans who “did not live through” the Apartheid era and have never heard the name P.W. Botha? Or is it incumbent on those of us who do have a passing familiarity with these abuses and those responsible for them to educate our benighted fellow citizens? Given the level of commitment popular liberal intellectual culture dedicates to cultivating awareness around these repugnant episodes in recent human history, it is conspicuous that many can only muster a shrug when confronted with post-Soviet amnesia.

Lowry appears to see the Great Forgetting as a source of exculpation for Americans who know nothing of the suffering endured by those who lived under collectivism. In fact, what she’s written is more of an indictment—not just of those voters but the institutions and enterprises devoted to socialism’s rehabilitation. If the right is guilty of seeing a Communist conspiracy down every blind alley, center-left media rarely misses a chance to highlight the virtues of life under the red star.

AddToAny

Printfriendly

EoZTV Podcast

Podcast URL

Subscribe in podnovaSubscribe with FeedlyAdd to netvibes
addtomyyahoo4Subscribe with SubToMe

search eoz

comments

Speaking

translate

E-Book

For $18 donation








Sample Text

EoZ's Most Popular Posts in recent years

Search2

Hasbys!

Elder of Ziyon - حـكـيـم صـهـيـون



This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For 20 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.

Donate!

Donate to fight for Israel!

Monthly subscription:
Payment options


One time donation:

Follow EoZ on Twitter!

Interesting Blogs

Blog Archive