Jews wearing a keffiyeh-style garment is "genocide." Eating falafel is "genocide." Israeli dance is "genocide." Who cares about real genocide anymore when you can associate it with Jews?

Yemenite Jew in the early 20th century wearing the sudra

Years ago we lampooned how Palestinians and their pals would freak out when Israelis would make their own Jewish versions of keffiyehs. Apparently Palestinian culture is so weak that the every existence of Jews eating hummus or wearing a headdress that Jews have worn for thousands of years threatens their cherished "symbol of resistance."

One Israeli, Rudy Rochman, is marketing his own sudra with a Star of David pattern, and he made this video describing it and its Jewish roots.

The only reason I found this video is because rabid anti-Zionist Rafael Shimunov stumbled upon it and labeled it "genocidal."

Yes, Jews wearing a scarf like their own Middle Eastern ancestors did is "genocide." Just like Israeli versions and adaptations of Middle Eastern foods are "genocide." Just like Israeli versions of Middle Eastern dance are "genocide."

Perhaps the ubiquitous olive wood camels that Arabs eagerly sold to Jewish tourists in the 1950s and 60s are also "genocide."

The constant associating Jews with genocide is, of course, deliberately meant to invert the Holocaust, the event that the term to be coined for. It is ironic that the people who pretend to care about genocide by using it for everything Israelis do are redefining and trivializing the term so that it becomes meaningless - and therefore all but ignored in cases that it really happens.

To the modern antisemites, applying the term to Jews is far more important than genocide itself.

---

---

Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon! Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424.  Read all about it here!