
Monday, October 04, 2021
Monday, October 04, 2021
Elder of Ziyon
HRW
In 2020, Roth used the term "apartheid" to describe Israel 22 times, Myanmar 3 times, and China once.
In 2021, Roth has used the term to refer to Israel 129 times - and has not referred to any other nation with that appellation even once since the his first use of that term in January.
The "apartheid" claim is ludicrous. Beyond that, Roth's obsession with painting Israel exclusively with that term this year means that Human Rights Watch has decided that only Israel is guilty of the crime of apartheid - giving Myanmar and China a pass in 2021.
HRW's definition of "apartheid," when applied to Israel, means little more than "discrimination" - something that pretty much every nation on Earth is guilty of in some way.
Even though Muslims in many European nations suffer discriminatory laws that Israel doesn't have. Even though Palestinians suffer worse under Arab rule than they do under Jewish rule.
The "Zionism is Apartheid" lie was started, not surprisingly, by Stalinists - people who didn't hide their antisemitism.
HRW's singling out of Israel as being uniquely evil is nothing short of obsessive - and its not using that term against any other state since January proves that this obsession has nothing to do with Israel's supposed crimes but rather HRW's underlying Jew-hatred.

Related Posts:
HRW researcher's disturbing hobbyMarc Garlasco, the HRW senior military analyst who has written a number of reports harshly critical of Israel and whose own expertise has been called into question, has a side hobby:Collecting Nazi memorabilia.I noticed his o… Read More
HRW's pattern of bias in its "Precisely Wrong" reportNo one denies that civilians were tragically killed in Gaza. The major question that human rights organizations like HRW and Amnesty International have to deal with is whether the civilian casualties could have been reasonabl… Read More
HRW report on IDF - one sided and deceptiveI just looked a little at the Human Rights Watch report on Israeli drones killing civilians in Gaza.The report was mainly written by Marc Garlasco, who had famously blamed Israel for the very ambiguous Gaza beach blast in 200… Read More
HRW responds, and so do IHuman Rights Watch is providing an offense (in every sense of the word) to defend their researcher Marc Garlasco. Earlier this evening I, and other bloggers who commented on the story of Garlasco's obsession with Nazi artifac… Read More
Human Rights Watch doesn't give a damn about human rights, example #2843Ken Roth, the outgoing head of Human Rights Watch, revealed how little he actually cares about human rights yet again, in just one tweet: The Israeli government should not be conditioning Palestinians' basic rights (to be ab… Read More