Israeli President Isaac Herzog gave a speech to a joint session of Congress in Washington on Wednesday.
When he entered the chambers he was greeted with a standing ovation that lasted more than three minutes.
After his introduction, there was another standing ovation. The only person I see not applauding (or otherwise busy) is Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) who had tried so hard to ingratiate herself with the Israel haters at Netroots on Saturday - but they stopped the proceedings for 16 minutes as soon as she was introduced. She pathetically tried to tell the modern antisemites, "I'm on your side!"
It is a good speech, addressing all the important topics that need to be addressed.
_________________________________________
Mr. Speaker, Madam Vice President, on November 10th, 1987, I was sitting at home with my wife, Michal, expecting our first child. We were watching the first Israeli President invited to address a Joint Session of Congress, in honor of the State of Israel’s 40th year of independence. That president was my father. Standing here today, representing the Jewish, democratic State of Israel in its 75th year, at the very podium from which my late father, President Chaim Herzog spoke, is the honor of a lifetime.
I was born and raised in Israel. But my father's diplomatic post at the United Nations, brought my family to New York in the 1970’s. During high school I volunteered with the Legal Aid Society for the Elderly in Brooklyn, New York. I volunteered with the impoverished and underprivileged elderly, including War Veterans and Holocaust survivors, who gave their best years to the country they loved.
My mentor at the organization was a subtle, reserved professional. She was strictly business. The moment she broke character has remained with me for nearly 50 years. It was the day she told me the love of her life died fighting for Israel. Her fiancé, a tall, bright- eyed American Jewish boy, was inspired by the Zionist dream and the Jewish people's desire for independence.
He voluntarily boarded a ship to Haifa, fought in the Israeli military, and fell in the battle for Israel’s Independence – just weeks before their wedding. Although decades had gone by, and she had rebuilt her life, the cracks in her heart remained.
That moment, in which I learned of the life he gave for the State of Israel spoke to the very core of the bond forged between the people of the United States and the people of Israel. How the nations we built overcame loss. How deeply our stories complement each other’s. How far we have all come, together.
Speaker McCarthy, I thank you for hosting this festive joint session of Congress celebrating the first 75 years of the State of Israel. Just a few weeks ago, during your first trip abroad as Speaker, you honored the Israeli people by addressing the Knesset in Jerusalem, the capital of the State of Israel and the Jewish people.
Your sincere expression of friendship on behalf of the United States of America truly resonated with the Israelis. Thank you.
Vice President Harris, it is such a pleasure to see you again. I vividly recall hosting you at the Knesset a few years back. Your stirring remarks at the Israeli Embassy’s Independence Day reception a few weeks ago, reflect both yours and President Biden’s decades- long, ironclad friendship with Israel.
A special thanks goes to Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi who first invited me less than a year ago, together with Senator Chuck Schumer.
Thank you to my dear friends, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, and House Minority Leader Congressman Hakeem Jeffries, for this bipartisan, bicameral invitation.
My thanks also to the distinguished members of the escort committee, for greeting me so warmly.
Mr. Speaker, dear friends. In Jewish weddings, a glass is placed on the ground, intentionally stomped on. This ritual evokes the destruction of our temple in Jerusalem two thousand years ago. Only after the glass is broken, can the celebration truly begin. Amidst the most joyous occasion in the lives of two individuals who have come together to build something whole, we recall what was once broken in our nation. Thus, the bitter blends with the sweet. Today, the Hebrew calendar points to the 1st day of the month of Av.
In Jewish tradition this is a somber period in which we mourn the loss of
our sovereignty. Jewish communities all over the world lament the beginning of our national exile, where throughout two millennia, we continuously expressed a spiritual connection to our ancestral Holy Land and a longing to return home and regain our independence.
Yet today, at this moment in my people's history, gathering on Capitol Hill to celebrate 75 years of Israeli independence with our greatest partner and friend, the United States of America, my soul is overflowing with pride and joy. The people of Israel are grateful to no end for the ancient promise fulfilled and for the friendship we have formed.
In 1949, the President of the United States of America, Harry S. Truman, met with the Chief Rabbi of the newly established State of Israel, my grandfather Rabbi Yitzhak Isaac Halevi Herzog, in the Oval Office. This was just a few years after each of them had pleaded and campaigned for the rescue of Europe’s Jews being slaughtered in the Holocaust by the Nazis.
In speaking to President Truman, Rabbi Herzog thanked him for being the first world leader to officially recognize the State of Israel, eleven minutes after its foundation. He spoke of the Divine Providence that destined President Truman to help bring about the rebirth of Israel, after two thousand years of exile. Witnesses of the encounter recalled tears running down President Truman’s cheeks. We are honored to have President Truman’s grandson, Clifton Truman Daniel with us here today.
When the State of Israel was established in 1948, the land which the Almighty promised to Abraham, to which Moses lead the Israelites, the land of the Bible, of milk and honey, evolved into an exquisite land of democracy. Against all odds, the Jewish people returned home and built a national home, which became a beautiful Israeli democracy, a mosaic of Jews, Muslims, Christians, Druze and Circassians, secular, traditional and orthodox, of all denominations, and all possible views and lifestyles. A land which welcomed the ingathering of exiles from one hundred different countries.
A land which became the Startup Nation – a bustling hub of innovation and creativity, social action and intellectual discovery, spiritual awakening and business ventures, scientific ingenuity and lifesaving medical breakthroughs.
We built a nation-state which has faced relentless war, terror, and delegitimization since its birth. A country fighting to defend itself from enemy and foe, yet whose citizens continue to greet each other with the word “peace”, Shalom.
A country which takes pride in its vibrant democracy, its protection of minorities, human rights, and civil liberties, as laid down by its parliament, the Knesset, and safeguarded by its strong Supreme Court and independent judiciary.
A state founded on complete equality of social and political rights for all its inhabitants irrespective of religion, race or gender – as stipulated explicitly in Israel’s Declaration of Independence.
A country which is ever evolving. A diverse amalgam of accents, beliefs, backgrounds and customs. Truly, a modern-day miracle.
This is the sweetness with which our country has been blessed. However, dear friends, the bitter casts a dark shadow on our country, on our region, on our world.
Mr. Speaker, perhaps the greatest challenge Israel and the United States face at this time, is the Iranian nuclear program.
Let there be no doubt: Iran does not strive to attain nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Iran is building nuclear capabilities, that pose a threat to the stability of the Middle East and beyond. Every country or region controlled or infiltrated by Iran has experienced utter havoc. We have seen this in Yemen, Gaza, in Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq. In fact, we have seen this in Iran itself where the regime has lost its people and is suppressing them brutally.
Iran has spread hatred, terror and suffering throughout the Middle East and beyond, adding fuel to the disastrous fire and suffering in Ukraine.
Iran is the only nation on the planet publicly calling, plotting, and developing means to annihilate another nation, a member of the family of nations, the State of Israel.
Israel has no border with Iran. Israel has no resources contested by Iran. Israel has no conflict with the Iranian people. And yet, the Iranian regime – together with its proxies throughout the Middle East – is aiming and working towards destroying the State of Israel, killing the Jews and challenging the entire free world.
Allowing Iran to become a nuclear threshold state – whether by omission or by diplomatic commission – is unacceptable. The world cannot remain indifferent to the Iranian regime’s call to wipe Israel off the map. Tolerating this call and Iran’s measures to realize it, is an inexcusable moral collapse. Backed by the free world, Israel and the United States must act forcefully together to prevent Iran’s fundamental threat to international security. I am here to reiterate what every Israeli leader has declared for decades: the State of Israel is determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapon capabilities.
Mr. Speaker, we are proud to be the United States’ closest partner and friend. We are grateful to the United States for the necessary means you have provided us to keep our qualitative military edge, and to enable us to defend ourselves, by ourselves. This reflects your ongoing commitment to Israel's security. We are also tremendously proud that ours is a two-way alliance, in which Israel has been making critical contributions to the national security and interests of the United States in numerous ways.
Thank you, dear members of Congress, for your support of Israel throughout history, and at this critical moment in time.
Mr. Speaker, there is no question that the peace which the United States brokered between Israel and its neighbors, has revolutionized the Middle East. The historic peace treaties with the Arab Republic of Egypt and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan have demonstrated the many blessings of opting out of the cycle of war. Both Jordan and Egypt have contributed tremendously to solidifying the precious peace and enhancing our region’s stability and wellbeing.
Three years ago, the Abraham Accords realigned our imaginations and our region. Israel eagerly welcomed the United Arab Emirates, the Kingdom of Bahrain and the Kingdom of Morocco into an exclusive, warm peace between our peoples. Since signing the accords, over one million Israelis have visited the Abraham Nations – a clear expression of our will to become integrated in the region.
This is a peace anchored in trust, hope and prosperity. A true game changer. Each of these historic agreements, which have altered the trajectory of the Middle East, was facilitated by our greatest friend the United States of America.
Israel’s hand is extended, and our heart is open, to any partner in peace – near or far.
Israel thanks the United States for working towards establishing peaceful relations between Israel and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, a leading nation in the region and in the Muslim world. We pray for this moment to come. This would be a huge sea change in the course of history in the Middle East and the world at large.
My deep yearning, Mr. Speaker, is for Israel to one day make peace with our Palestinian neighbors. Over the years, Israel has taken bold steps towards peace and made far reaching proposals to our Palestinian neighbors. Notwithstanding the deep political differences, and the numerous challenges that surround Israeli-Palestinian relations – and I do not ignore them – but it should be clear that one cannot talk about peace while condoning or legitimizing terror, implicitly or explicitly. True peace cannot be anchored in violence.
Palestinian terror against Israel or Israelis undermines any possibility for a future of peace between our peoples. Israelis are targeted while waiting for busses, while taking a stroll on the promenade, while spending time with their family. At the same time, successful terror attacks are celebrated, terrorists are glorified, and their families are financially rewarded for every Israeli they attack. This is inconceivable. It is a moral disgrace. Terror is not a bump in the road. Terror is hatred and bloodshed. It contradicts humanity’s most basic principles of peace. Israel cannot and will not tolerate terror, and we know that in this we are joined by the United States of America.
Two Israeli officers, Oron Shaul and Hadar Goldin, and two civilians, Hisham al-sayed, and Avera Mengistu, are being held hostage by Hamas for years, for the sole purpose of torturing the families they left behind. Lieutenant Hadar Goldin was abducted in violation of a UN-sponsored humanitarian cease-fire, negotiated by the United States. His family has been fighting for nine years to bring him home. I asked Hadar Goldin’s mother, Leah, to be here with us today. We pray for her son’s return, as well as the three other Israelis.
We pray for the fulfillment of Isaiah’s prophecy, “Nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore.”
The younger generation of Israelis and Palestinians deserve better. They are all worthy of a future to look towards, a future of peace and prosperity. A future of hope. I am wholeheartedly committed to this vision, a vision of hope and peace, true peace, without any terror.
Mr. Speaker, the sacred bond we share is unique in scope and quality because it is based on values that reach across generations and administrations, governments and coalitions, carrying us through times of turmoil and elation.
One hundred and sixty years ago, President Abraham Lincoln spoke of the dream to restore the Jews to their national home, as one shared by many Americans. The inscription on Philadelphia’s Liberty Bell articulates the Hebrew Bible’s code of ethics: “Proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof.” This verse from Leviticus, shining through the crack of the Liberty Bell, underscores the principles that fuel the American dream. These words have bound our nations through the ages. Coming together today, in this chamber of liberty and freedom, we are all realizing the hopes of our founding fathers and mothers. We are so very proud of the true friendship we have forged.
A mutually beneficial partnership that has withstood challenges and weathered great disagreements, because it is based not on uniformity of approach, but on the ultimate currency of trust. It is not dependent upon operating in harmony, but on the history we share, on the truths we cherish, on the values we embody. This partnership is based also on the similarities and the affinity between our peoples, the courageous immigrants, and the trailblazing pioneers.
It is rooted deep in our respective declarations of independence. In the American Declaration of Independence, the founders appealed to the “Supreme Judge of the World.” In the Israeli Declaration of Independence, influenced by America’s, our founders placed their trust in “the Rock of Israel.”
The revered American Jewish spiritual leader Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel, embodied the bridge between our peoples and the story of American Jewry. After escaping from the Holocaust, Rabbi Heschel publicly advocated interfaith dialogue. He fought for civil liberties in America and marched alongside Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in the historic march from Selma to Montgomery, in March of 1965.
Rabbi Heschel wrote: “To be is to stand for”. I am so pleased to have his daughter, Professor Susannah Heschel of Dartmouth, join us here today. Susannah, your father reminds us that the principles we defend make us what we are.
Rabbi Heschel wrote: “To be is to stand for”. I am so pleased to have his daughter, Professor Susannah Heschel of Dartmouth, join us here today. Susannah, your father reminds us that the principles we defend make us what we are.
Ultimately, Israel and the United States stand — and indeed, have always stood for the same values. Our two nations are both diverse, life- affirming societies that stand for liberty, equality, and freedom. At our core, both our peoples seek to repair the cracks in our world. Having said this, I am well aware that our world is changing. A new generation of Israelis and Americans are assuming leadership roles. A generation that was not privy to the hardship of Israel’s formative years. A generation that is less engaged in the roots that connect our peoples. A generation that, perhaps, takes for granted the U.S.-Israel relationship.
Yet, at this moment I choose optimism. Because to me it is clear that the shift in generations does not reflect changing values. Nor does it indicate changes in our interests. When the United States is strong, Israel is stronger. And when Israel is strong, the United States is more secure.
Today, dear friends, we are provided the opportunity to reaffirm and redefine the future of our relationship. Each of us here has a decisive role in the future we are building. Many of the challenges Israel and the United States face are similar. We are all experiencing a tumultuous shift in balance, evident in countless areas: geopolitical unrest, big power competition, catastrophic war in Ukraine, pandemics, climate crisis, the unknown of artificial intelligence, energy shortages, food insecurity, scarcity of water and desertification, global terror, social polarization, and the attempts to destabilize democracy.
Each of these challenges present an opportunity to seek out solutions together, which will benefit the global community. Israel has the ability to contribute in a unique, significant fashion to addressing these challenges. Israel and the United States are world leaders in aiding countries whose people have suffered. Our collaborative capabilities, coupled with our mutually beneficial partnership are the key to the future of our children. To us, it is clear that America is irreplaceable to Israel, and Israel is irreplaceable to America. It is time to design the next stage of our evolving friendship and our growing partnership together.
Ladies and gentlemen, let’s do it together. Let’s elevate our partnership to new levels.
Mr. Speaker, I am not oblivious to criticism among friends, including some expressed by respected members of this House. I respect criticism, especially from friends, although one does not always have to accept it. But criticism of Israel must not cross the line into negation of the State of Israel’s right to exist. Questioning the Jewish people’s right to self-determination, is not legitimate diplomacy, it is antisemitism.
Vilifying and attacking Jews, whether in Israel, in the United States, or anywhere in the world is antisemitism. Antisemitism is a disgrace in every form, and I commend President Joe Biden for laying out the United States’ first ever National Strategy to Combat Antisemitism.
Dear friends, it’s no secret that over the past few months, the Israeli people have engaged in a heated and painful debate. We have been immersed in voicing our differences and revisiting and renegotiating the balance of our institutional powers in the absence of a written constitution. In practice, the intense debate going on back home, even as we speak, is the clearest tribute to the fortitude of Israel’s democracy. Israel’s democracy has always been based on free and fair elections, on honoring the people’s choice, on safeguarding minority rights, on protection of human and civil liberties, and on a strong and independent judiciary.
Our democracy is also 120 Members of Knesset, comprised of Jews, Muslims, Christians or Druze, representing every opinion under the Israeli sun, working and debating side by side. Our democracy is also late Friday afternoon, when the sound of the Muezzin calling to prayer, blends with the siren announcing the Sabbath in Jerusalem, while one of the largest and most impressive LGBTQ Pride Parades in the world is going on in Tel Aviv.
Our democracy is also reflected in protesters taking to the streets all across the country, to emphatically raise their voices and fervently demonstrate their point of view. Our democracy is the blue and white Israeli flag waved and loved by all Israelis taking part in the debate. I am well aware of the imperfections of Israeli democracy, and I am conscious of the questions posed by our greatest of friends. The momentous debate in Israel is painful, and deeply unnerving, because it highlights the cracks within the whole.
As President of Israel, I am here to tell the American people, and each of you, that I have great confidence in Israeli democracy. Although we are working through sore issues, just like you, I know our democracy is strong and resilient. Israel has democracy in its DNA.
I am deeply mindful of the challenge which this moment presents to Israeli society, and I have made it the priority of my presidency to play a leading role in this critical and emotional public discussion. I will say to you, our friends, in English, what I have said to my people, to my sisters and brothers, in Hebrew: as a nation, we must find the way to talk to each other no matter how long it takes. As head of state, I will continue doing everything to reach a broad public consensus, and to preserve, protect and defend the State of Israel’s democracy.
Mr. Speaker, for so many Israelis this very public debate is also very personal. It is now a little after 6pm in Israel. They will soon sit down to dinner, together, beside family or friends, with whom they may severely disagree. But they are, and they will always remain, family.
Israel and the United States will inevitably disagree on many matters. But we will always remain family. Our evolutionary societies have so much to give to the world, and so much to learn from each other. Our bond may be challenged at times, but it is
absolutely unbreakable. The Israeli national anthem, “Hatikva”, is a song of hope. The late Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks wrote that in Judaism, hope is an active virtue, which requires a great deal of courage. Hope is the belief that together we can make the world better, that we can overcome any setbacks, and heal the fractures in our world.
Israel’s first seventy-five years were rooted in an ancient dream. Let us base our next seventy-five years on hope. Our shared hope, that we can heal our fractured world, as the closest of allies and friends.
Thank you, members of both houses, for celebrating Israel’s independence. Am Yisrael Chai (The people of Israel lives.) God Bless the State of Israel! God Bless the United States of America!
If there was a core audience for Israeli President Isaac Herzog’s address on Wednesday to a joint session of Congress, it was the many Democrats who support Israel but don’t have the same connection (the “kishkes test”) with the Jewish state under the current right-wing government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Herzog championed Israel’s protection of minorities, human rights and civil liberties, touted Tel Aviv’s Pride parade as one of the largest in the world and even gave a shout-out to former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), a liberal Democrat with a long record of supporting Israel.
The nine far-left House Democrats who voted against a bipartisan resolution supporting Israel and condemning antisemitism — and who were no-shows at Herzog’s speech — are likely a lost cause for supporters of Israel. But the many other progressive Democrats who were in attendance are — in political parlance — persuadables. Herzog’s pitch was directed squarely at them, as the debate over the Netanyahu government's judicial overhaul, and the divisions within the Democratic Party over Israel, intensify.
Evidence of Herzog’s success could be judged by the frequent rounds of bipartisan applause, and the packed attendance in the House gallery. Indeed, many of the 58 Democratic lawmakers who in 2015 skipped Netanyahu’s speech before a similar joint session attended Herzog’s address on Wednesday, among them Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Brian Schatz (D-HI) and Tim Kaine (D-VA).
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon!
Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424.
Every month or so, Jewish pilgrims go to visit Joseph's Tomb in Shechem (Nablus).
Under the Oslo Accords, Jews should have free access to the holy site. But Palestinians would rather kill them.
So the IDF has to go in to protect the worshipers, and the worshipers go in the middle of the might, to cause as little of a disturbance to the nearby residents as possible.
Fat chance. Terror groups are hell-bent on blocking the Jews from visiting their holy spot, so they try to stop the pilgrimage - with bullets, with IEDs, and generally turning the city into a mini-war zone.
Every month.
On Wednesday night, one mujahid was killed as he tried to prevent Jews from visiting the site.
Terror-linked media gleefully brag about how much firepower they use to be active Jew-haters:
The Al-Quds Brigades - the Nablus Brigade responded to the storming of the occupation forces and settlers, by firing heavy salvoes of bullets at them and detonating a number of explosive devices in more than one area in the vicinity of Joseph's Tomb.
Al-Quds Brigades, the military wing of the Islamic Jihad Movement in Palestine, confirmed that its mujahideen in the Nablus Battalion repelled, tonight, the occupation forces' incursion into the eastern region of the city and the vicinity of Joseph's Tomb, with heavy salvoes of bullets and explosive devices.
The Saraya said in several military reports, "The soldiers of the Al-Mayamin Battalion targeted the occupation vehicles on Al-Hisba Street with heavy bullets, and they were also able to detonate a number of explosive devices in the occupation vehicles on Amman Street and Al-Hisba directly.
The terrorists up the ante to bury IEDs in the road. Israel brings in armored bulldozers to detonate them.
The only reason there is escalation on the Palestinian side is a burning desire to stop religious Jews - they type they claim that they don't hate - from worshiping.
The only reason there is escalation on the Israeli side is to continue to protect the Jewish worshipers, and not to knuckle under to terror.
The PA should be the ones protecting the Jews under signed agreements. Obviously, they cannot. And almost certainly some members of the Al Aqsa Brigades are there, shooting at and trying to bomb the Jews, who are also members of PA security forces during the day.
These are the facts around Joseph's Tomb. It is all antisemitism. But no media has the guts to report that.
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon!
Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424.
Defining anti-Semitism, reasserting law and order, and giving Jewish institutions the resources and training to protect themselves will help reduce anti-Semitic attacks, but these measures will not diminish the underlying anti-Semitic sentiments that cause them.
The Biden plan relies heavily on existing government-enabled diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives — now apparently called DEIA with the "A" standing for accessibility — to address root causes and promote anti-hate education. This is a worrisome development given that some DEI offices are more likely to house anti-Semitism than to combat it. A Heritage Foundation study of the social-media patterns of 800 campus DEI officers found that they tended to reflect a level of hostility toward Israel that went far beyond policy disagreement and often descended into anti-Semitism. One DEI officer who led a University of Maryland anti-Semitism task force accused Israel of an "ongoing genocide and ethnic cleansing of Palestine." Establishing organizations along similar lines and expecting them to combat anti-Semitism will only worsen matters. Thus, limited-government advocates who want to reduce anti-Semitism via public policy should be wary of DEI or DEIA initiatives.
Given that the State Department envoy for anti-Semitism is not tasked with addressing anti-Semitism at home, one potential step policymakers could take is creating a position within the U.S. government to focus on the issue domestically. Former envoy Carr proposes either authorizing a role for a special envoy within the White House Domestic Policy Council or expanding the existing envoy's charge to covering domestic as well as international anti-Semitism.
If the U.S. government is going to expend significant resources to address anti-Semitism, it makes sense to have someone in government monitoring the various offices dedicated to this purpose and attempting to establish some kind of coordination among them. But putting such a position within the White House's purview means it will be subject to the political and policy whims of each successive administration. Perhaps a better idea would be to establish the position within the Justice Department and make it a career job for a former law-enforcement official that would continue regardless of the winner of our quadrennial presidential elections.
The person appointed to this role should consider expanding early intervention programs. We now have a list of indicators that can help identify potential anti-Semitic assailants; for example, those inclined to anti-Semitic violence tend to have experienced some kind of trauma within their own communities and are often isolated. Given our knowledge of these indicators, the potential for group-oriented violence can often be identified at some point before the individual harms anyone — in schools or the corrections system, for instance.
The special envoy should also lead a thorough review of areas in which the federal government enables anti-Semitism. As noted above, the American government does not intentionally target Jews, and even tries to combat anti-Semitism. Yet several government-funded programs could be subsidizing anti-Semitism anyway.
Many if not most of these funds are given to anti-Semitic individuals and programs in educational institutions, including anti-Semitic professors, extremist anti-Israel speakers invited to campus, and public universities that form hostile environments for Jewish students. Title VI of the Higher Education Act provides funds to anti-Israel Middle East Studies programs, academic departments that have issued extremist anti-Israel statements, and public institutions that pay membership dues to the virulently anti-Israel Middle Eastern Studies Association. At the K-12 level, federal funds may go to public schools that assign textbooks containing anti-Semitic materials, encourage anti-Jewish attitudes through ethnic studies or anti-Israel programs, or pay for anti-Semitic critical-race-theory training.
Jason Bedrick, an education policy expert at the Heritage Foundation, has called for a congressional review of government funding for these types of programs, which is a good idea. But such review should take place on the executive-branch side as well, with the Office of Management and Budget taking the lead so that individual agencies are not charged with protecting their own pet projects from scrutiny.
In addition to these education-related expenditures that may have the unintended impact of increasing anti-Semitism, we should also consider cutting off certain types of foreign aid that have a similarly destructive effect. These include contributions to the U.N. Human Rights Council, UNESCO, UNRWA, and any funds that go to programs that subsidize anti-Semitic textbooks or Palestinian terrorism.
Eliminating these programs would not only save taxpayers money and reduce funding to those who purvey anti-Semitism but also send the strongest possible signal that the federal government does not tolerate this animus, whatever its source may be. The Biden administration plan in general refused to confront the problem of anti-Semitism among the anti-Israel left, and it unsurprisingly did not call for any kind of internal scrub of government funding for programs that could promote or harbor anti-Semitism. Yet such a comprehensive rescission would be a useful policy proposal for a future Republican administration to consider.
Tevi Troy joins the podcast to talk about what it’s like to work in a White House when the president seems infirm or out of touch or in a lot of trouble. And he discusses his important article, “How to Combat Anti-Semitism.” (starts 37:50)
Mohd Abdul Gaffar, a retired Pakistan Air Force officer from Green Town, reported that as he was returning home after morning prayers... he discovered a small pamphlet containing blasphemous content on the boundary wall of his house. The contents of the pamphlet were highly disrespectful towards Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and other revered figures. The pamphlet also contained derogatory comments against the holy Quran and even praised the recent burning of a Quran in Sweden.
Past incidents include those... where several people were murdered, some burned alive, while dozens of Christians are still languishing in prison, awaiting their fate. It is worth noting that all those accused of committing blasphemy (who were not murdered by lynch mobs) were eventually proven innocent in court and freed.
It is believed that, regrettably, certain individuals in Pakistan are exploiting the incident of the Quran burning in Sweden as an excuse to fuel the flames of hatred and seek revenge against local Christians, who are peaceful, believe in respect for all religions, and have no connection to the Swedish incident.
It is crucial for the Pakistani government to take necessary steps to stop the ongoing misuse of the Penal Code's blasphemy sections against Christians and other religious minorities in Pakistan.
JNS got a scoop last month that Florida was investigating investment giant Morningstar. On Monday, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, currently the second-ranked Republican presidential candidate, said in a video excerpting a speech he gave to the 2023 Christians United for Israel summit taking place this week in Washington, D.C.: “We’re not letting them target Israel and get away with it.”
DeSantis announced that Florida would officially investigate Morningstar, an investment firm, for violating the new law opposing the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement.
The law Morningstar may have broken went into effect in May. It forbids companies doing business with the state of Florida from “taking adverse action, including changes to published commercial financial ratings, risk ratings and controversy ratings based on non-pecuniary factors, to inflict economic harm on Israel or persons or entities doing business in Israel or in Israeli controlled territories.”
Morningstar is suspected of being in violation of the law because it has been accused of using investment ratings that discriminate against Israel. The parent company has experienced a crashing fall from grace, now under investigation in 20 states.
Dave Bender is a sensitive soul, thank God,
because that acute sensitivity informs his work from behind the lens. Bender is
a photographer and videographer, but then he is many things, for example, a
prize-winning radio journalist, beekeeper, and a husband to Miri. Still, it’s
the photographs that grab you as you scroll through your Instagram feed, if you’re
lucky enough to follow him. The viewer finds he must pause his mindless scrolling
to fully appreciate each arresting image as it appears. Dave Brian Bender has
an eye for the perfect moment and an uncommon artistry; his work is a thought-provoking
pleasure to behold.
Born in the Bronx, Dave grew up in a then small
town on Florida’s west coast, until 1972, when he made Aliyah with his dad while
still in middle school. In Israel, Bender was sent to boarding school for a
couple of years, and it was during this time that he had his first personal
experience with war in the form of the 1973 Yom Kippur War, a prominent marker
in his life. At this point, Dave returned to the States, where he remained for
a decade before making Aliyah once more, this time for good. Today, Dave and
Miri live near Tzfat (Safed, if you prefer your Hebrew Anglicized), where they
tend to their beehives and artisanal honey and honey products company, Neshikha. And of course, Dave is taking those
photos and shooting that footage—at events, and whenever the mood strikes or
something catches his eye, which is often.
Dave Bender with a young bee safari visitor.
Here, Dave talks about his early life, his craft,
and what inspires him today:
Varda
Epstein: We’ve been acquainted for some time. When I first knew you, I thought
of you mainly as a writer, something we share in common. Then more and more, I
began to see your photographs and videos. Would you say that today,
photographer/videographer is your main gig? Was it a conscious decision to
narrow your creative focus?
Dave Bender: Yes, on both counts – I was never
a good typist or note-taker; due to the distraction of sitting next to the
ebulliently lovely Susan Walton in Mrs. Haney's typing class. Susan was no less
than the head of the Stratford Sr. High School Spartanaires cheerleader team.
Let's just say that – for a neighborhood newbie dork like me - focusing on IBM
Selectric touch-typing inevitably took second place to sharpening my situational
awareness and side-glance visual acuity skills, which would later come in
useful in “reading” subtle cues by interviewees and covering breaking news
events.
So, Susan, if you’re reading this: thanks for,
well - just being you. And yes, I really did want to take you to the prom.
Nor did I ever formally learn the
news-gathering craft via Journalism or communications courses at university or
college, where fast, accurate typing is a prerequisite – never went to school
at all, actually. In fact, I was actually expelled from my sole journalism
class, being summarily told off by my instructor: “...face it, Dave: you're
never going to be a journalist.”
Guess I made up for it tho, even picking up a GA Associated Press radio award
or two along the way. So – maybe – her dismissal planted a hard seed of “Oh yeah?
Hold my beer...” that took a lot of tough living in the interim to germinate.
"Shacharit on the beehives in the backyard Beeyard during Covid. Their hum is very centering."
However, in my defense, I did later earn a BA
at The Life U School of Hard Knocks, and a second degree in news coverage at
Whossamotta U (Google it); I learned shoe-leather reporting the “old-skool” way
via the bullpen, first at the JPost
Breaking News Desk, and later at a raft of other outlets, locally and
internationally, and branching out into radio, and later video, as the Internet
came to the fore.
While I worked for decades as a print, radio, and, later, TV
reporter and editor in both Israel and the US, I'd always been attracted to
photography and videography; as time went by I'd often end up shooting more and
more stills and video footage covering breaking news events, at features, in
interviews, and commonly used the imaging as a tool to better describe and
flesh out the dry text.
When I worked a three-year stint at NPR
affiliate radio stations in Georgia (WJSP-FM as a bureau chief,
and WABE as a freelancer), I'd often record
audio and shoot simultaneously which sometimes seemed, at least to me – others
just stared - the only way to sufficiently absorb what the story was about.
Street scene, Shuk HaPishpeshim, Yaffo
Varda
Epstein: How did you get bit by the photography bug? When did you get your
first camera? Can you tell us a bit about that camera and your earliest days
behind the lens?
Dave Bender: About as far back as I can recall
as a kid, my dad “loaned” me his Yashika camera – then a Japanese mid-range
model, which stopped production around 2005. As I remember, not only did I use
it for photos, but it became my first “tear-down” device to see how it worked –
ages before YouTube creators glommed onto the idea; I'm insatiably curious like
that. The Yashika, regrettably, never went fully back together, and I seem to
recall having a few leftover parts after the reassembly... not long after that,
I came to own a cheapo Super-8 camera which I used to shoot clips of my model
car collection and whatnot.
Varda
Epstein: What do you enjoy most? Videography or photography? What can you capture
in a photo that you cannot in a video?
Dave Bender: I'm a quick study in both genres;
I shoot video nowadays mostly for marketing our honey and
bee products buzzness (see what I did there?), Neshikha, and the still photography for my
own professional development and
personal pleasure.
Both skill sets and philosophies really merge though; I really think that the
technical, compositional, and “telling a story in one shot” are crucial to
mastering both crafts. Indeed, as, for example, smartphone still and video
quality continue dramatically improving – and over 90 percent of my work
nowadays is shot and edited on my Samsung S22 Ultra (and previously, others,
and whatever comes down the pike next) – I believe we're starting to see a
melding of the genres, and – maybe next year or a decade from now – won’t even
understand the primitive dichotomy between still and moving images, and view
“imaging,” maybe with fully immersive tactile, aural, and other abilities – as
a continuum, and not as separate conceptual boxes. You already see glimmers of
it in AI-assisted photography - which nowadays means pretty much anything
digitally recorded, and not necessarily a clunky AI text or visual prompt.
Varda
Epstein: The black and white event photos you’ve shared on Instagram are
probably the main reason I wanted to do this interview. Those photos, are to
me, more beautiful than any color photos you might have taken of the same
scene. What can we see in black and white that we might not see in color?
Dave Bender: I’m really flattered - thank you
(and - as you know - I’m usually the kind to prefer chewing hot glass to
accepting a compliment. The check is already in the mail as we speak).
Anyway, in the words of advertising and documentary photographer, Elliot
Erwitt, “Color is descriptive. Black and White is interpretative.” Often,
visualizing, composing and shooting (or post editing) in black and white strips
away the visual clutter and distraction inherent in a color photo and forces
the viewer to quietly notice shape, form, and the geometry of buildings, poses,
and, hopefully, whatever the photographer wanted to feature in the image. And -
no less importantly - the sense of time passing; something about black and
white always looks contemporary, as it’s been said, and I’d sign off on that.
As legendary Canadian newspaper photographer, Ted Grant, once memorably put it:
“When you photograph people in color, you photograph their clothes. But when
you photograph people in black and white, you photograph their souls!” Just to
stress: I'm nobody's pretentious fotogsnob, and love photos and footage of
scenes drenched in color, or dulcet, pastel soft tones. Maybe it's a left
brain/right brain kind of thing. American film director, Samuel Fuller, once cleverly
quipped: “Life is in color, but black and white is more realistic.”
Hachnasat Sefer Torah, Kfar Hananya
Varda
Epstein: Who influences your work as a photographer and why?
Dave Bender: Well, one quote that really
grabbed me was by Jennifer Price: “What I love about Black & White
photographs is that they're more like reading the book than seeing the movie.”
so she’s on my list now, lol.
UK-based Sean
Tucker is among my current photographic “spirit animals,” among others, and
his achingly honest self-critique, soul quietude and Zen-like focus on the
philosophy of imaging really gets me where I live - or, at least, aspire to
rent.
"This one, of a greengrocer sorting through greens after hours, looked like a stage set as the play begins, with lights, dark shadows, and 'popp-eye' color - was already composed and all I had to do was notice the scene, and take the shot."
Locally, there are so many; if I named one,
I’d be inadvertently dissing another, but - offhand, on mobile, Ido Izsak does some funky fashion stuff; Dina Alfasi does phenomenal
iPhone street portraits - many of them on her daily commuter train route; I’ve
hired and would love to work with powerhouse, Rebecca Kowalski; Laura Ben-David has a
great eye; there’s a long list actually, and I see many of them via my social
media feeds.
Oh, also there’s an astounding collection of
fotog talent over at Fearless
Photographers that I’d frequent for sheer, bold inspiration when I was
actively shooting weddings and similar family events.
But - growing out of being a DSLR
photographic gearhead, and centering on mobile photography (which also has its
own gear - just commonly much smaller, lighter, and more inexpensive…) - forces
you to zone in on classic technique: subject, composition, and lighting, and
not rely on $5k DSLR bodies wedded to $10k lenses to get the “money shot.”
Apropos, there’s an amazingly instructive - and often unintentionally hilarious
- video series many of my fave, top-end shooters have taken part in over the
years dubbed, “The Toy Camera Challenge.”
There, world-famous fotogs head out for some impromptu street or fashion photography, but wielding a Playskool,
Lego, or - gawd help us - a Barbie camera, instead of a
heavy camera backpack or two of camera bodies, lenses, lights, and assistants.
What’s fascinating, and inspiring, is how
they’ll gamely - if sometimes ironically - take on the challenge, and, along
the way happily share their trade secrets, honed skills, comprehensive
technical knowledge, and flat-out talents - to get remarkable, and even
artistic, images, despite the limitations of the device. It really separates
the pros from the dilettantes…
"Still life with Scruff"
Varda
Epstein: Recently you shared some of your street photography. My husband
remarked that your work was reminiscent of Edward Hopper. What is it about
street photography that is so compelling for you as a genre?
Dave Bender: “Nighthawks” Hopper? We are not
worthy… shooting street - and I’m a relative newbie on this playing field -
demands a quick eye, absolutely knowing your gear and how to deal with
fast-changing lighting and composition - and an ability to discreetly meld into
the scene, and not draw attention to yourself. As Tucker calls it, one can be a
“hunter,” or “fisherman” fotog, and that’s a useful way to divvy up the
approaches: you either actively seek out or patiently wait out the “decisive
moment.”
I’m still learning.
Street scene
Varda
Epstein: Some years back, you did your first model shoot, right? Can you talk
about that? What was it like?
Dave Bender: There’s a fun, Israeli social
media-based photography group I belonged to that hires/barters a rotating cast
of models for remote shoots, like at the Dead Sea, Mitzpe Ramon, or sites at
various beaches. It was the first time I'd actually worked
with models, costumes, makeup and props, and it was invigorating to see how
the some three dozen photographers - at all experience and equipment levels -
succeeded in working with the professional (and patient) models and dancers.
It was a very intensive gig and set in an inspirational wild and desolate
setting, located in the desert at Mitzpe Ramon. I had a blast and learned a ton
about that side of the biz during the two-day event, including how to integrate
with the group as the (apparently) sole outwardly observant (kipa and tzitzit-out)
Jew; not being a particularly modest or subtle guy anyway, it never occurred to
me that - fortunately very few - others in the group would look askance, or
even aghast, at me for “daring” to be there, working the shots with the rest of
the fotogs, with the flamboyantly, lightly clad models. I really didn’t think
of it as immodest; there was nothing perverse or kinky going on - and, no, I’m
far from naive, having grown up totally secular and assimilated - since it was
a very respectful and informal scenario for both the models and the team. I
felt mostly at home and comfortable.
I’m proud of the shots I got and edited, and share here. Interestingly enough,
afterward, when I showed the photos to my wife and our coterie of strictly
religiously observant local female friends - all admired and loved the shots,
with some noting that they showed strong, independent, secure and proud women,
“owning” the visual space. Crazily, ironically, some secular, self-declared
feminist friends in the US took a far less kind take on the images, accusing me
of “the male gaze” and objectifying the models. The native Israeli female
fotogs I was ducking and weaving right along with at the shoot might take issue
with that reflexive presumption of guilt.
Varda Epstein: Okay, enough about you. Where and when did you meet your wife?
How did the two of you end up in Tzfat? What made Miri become a beekeeper? Did
she ever think, when she was a little girl, that she’d grow up and be a beekeeper
in Tzfat?
Dave Bender: Miri and I met via the
JWed/Frumster dating app, and met, dated in real life, and, married in Tzfat in
2013. Miri, as a 24-year US Army veteran, had made several close friends during
her service who had, eventually, made Aliyah (emigrated) to Israel, and some to
Tzfat, and she, essentially, made Aliyah in their wake.
She’d always viewed professional beekeeping as an intensive, creative, and
possibly profitable retirement activity, and, soon after we married signed on
to an intensive, year-long, weekly, hands-on beekeeping course taught by a
senior beekeeping professor. I, initially, thought it was, frankly, sweetly
eccentric, and shrugged, not even liking honey… I came around after a few years
of doing scut work, and, later, took my own year-long COVID-era online course
via Michigan State University’s “Hives
for Heroes” course for US military personnel and dependents - and, I was,
um, “stung” with the beekeeping bug.
Miri, in beekeeper mode.
Miri explains the business of making honey.
Varda
Epstein: A lot of people who make Aliyah find themselves doing things they’d
never thought of doing, to make a living. Would you say that’s true of you and
your wife? What do you think you would have ended up doing professionally in
the States?
Dave Bender: And how. After living here a year during the 1973 Yom Kippur War,
and, later, making final Aliyah a decade or so later in my mid-20s, we’ve collectively
invested five decades of our lives here. Frankly, not only do I have no earthly
idea what or where I’d be in the States by now - I’ve long since ceased
entertaining the question.
Dave and his daughter in-law feeding the bees in winter.
Varda
Epstein: What’s next for Dave Bender?
Dave Bender: In the inestimable words of Marlon
Brando in The Wild One, “Whaddya’ got?”
***
To learn more about Dave Bender and his professional event and editorial photography, video, editing, and mentoring services, or to purchase prints, see: http://www.davebrianbender.com/.
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon!
Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424.
I subscribe to a monthly UN bulletin that reproduces reports and speeches by UN committees and officials, as well as NGOs and non-UN international organizations, about Israel and the Palestinian territories.
The sources for this month's bulletin include these UN organizations that are dedicated full time to demonizing Israel:
Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People (CEIRPP)
Division for Palestinian Rights (DPR)
Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices
Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the OPT
United Nations Independent International Commission on the oPt, including E. Jerusalem, and Israel
United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA)
United Nations Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process (UNSCO)
In other months I also see:
Register of Damage caused by the construction of the Wall (UNROD)
United Nations Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator for the OPT
Not to mention under the Human Rights Council:
Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories
The United Nations Commission of Inquiry on the 2018 protests in the Occupied Palestinian Territory
The United Nations Independent Commission of Inquiry on the 2014 Gaza Conflict
This is not including the many committees that bash Israel incessantly in their international roles, like the
Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance; or the Special Rapporteur on the human rights of internally displaced persons.
I've probably missed a few.
This is obsession. And yes, to have such an absurd focus on the Jewish state is indeed antisemitic.
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon!
Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424.
Don't let that sideshow distract from the Democrats in the White House, whose decision to intrude into a matter of Israeli domestic politics is doing more harm to the U.S.-Israel relationship than the casual bigotry that has become a permanent feature of the American Left.
President Joe Biden and his ambassador to Israel, Tom Nides, don't approve of a series of judicial reforms that Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu supports. That sounds to us like something for Israelis to debate among themselves, but Biden has decided to throw spitballs from the sidelines, advising Bibi that Israel "cannot continue down this road"—and then icing him out, announcing in March that he had no plans to invite the prime minister to the White House.
Until Monday, it had been months since they spoke. Biden, at last, has grudgingly extended Bibi an invitation to meet in the United States—but not necessarily at the White House. His invitation to Herzog, who is a critic of the judicial reforms and whose position is purely symbolic, adds insult to injury.
The U.S. president's petulance, meanwhile, has forestalled conversations on important issues. News reports indicate Hezbollah has been crossing into Israeli territory, illegal weapons are proliferating in the West Bank, and the White House is trying to engineer another ill-conceived deal with Iran.
Jayapal's racism is not news, and the decision of a group of Democrats to boycott Herzog's speech makes clear their objection is not to any set of Israeli policies but to the existence of the Jewish state. Biden, on the other hand, has described himself as a "lifelong friend and supporter of the State of Israel." As on so much else, he has surrendered whatever principles he once held to his party's ascendant progressive orthodoxy.
The claim of a taboo against criticizing Israel is itself an anti-Semitic trope, the most obscenely common and casual one there is. But think of what it really means: You’re just calling people anti-Semitic because they’re saying things the Jews don’t want you to hear. No one put it more primitively than Omar, who tweeted “Israel has hypnotized the world, may Allah awaken the people and help them see the evil doings of Israel.” (Don’t worry, she “apologized.”) Michelle Goldberg’s own paper trades in it regularly and has for a long time, even as it throws up headline after headline describing Israel as a racist autocracy. In 2011, Times columnist Tom Friedman wrote that then-recent standing ovations for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Congress were “bought and paid for by the Israel lobby.” And Michelle Goldberg’s proposed lattice of taboos is so protective that Friedman wrote a piece just last week, 12 years later, describing how Israel is “engaged in unprecedented radical behavior” that’s threatening the U.S.-Israel alliance.
We’re hearing more and more naked anti-Semitism from public figures because Goldberg is precisely wrong. It’s open season on Israel. A new study by the Ruderman Family Foundation and the Network Contagion Research Institute found that Israel is attacked on social media more than any country in the world. China, Russia, and North Korea can’t compete. And, increasingly, social media is where politicians and the press get their cues.
This is no claim for Israel’s victim status. The Jewish state can take it. Swing away. Give it your best shot. The critics aren’t doing a very good job. Despite all the calumnies and hit jobs, Israel is thriving and building alliances. That’s because it isn’t protected by some invisible mesh of censorship. It’s defended by Iron Dome, the IDF, the faith and innovation of its people, and the workings of its rugged democracy. Joe Biden, having struck out with the scolding approach, has just invited Netanyahu to the United States. Let’s see just how restrained Israel’s critics are about that.
Yesterday, the Israeli president Isaac Herzog arrived in Washington for an official visit. Today, he will address a joint session of Congress, at the invitation of the Democratic leadership. At least five hard-left representatives—the so-called “Squad”—have made clear that they will not be attending, due to their hostility toward the Jewish state. Meanwhile, another representative, Pramila Jayapal, announced at a progressive conference last week that she and her colleagues “have been fighting to make it clear that Israel is a racist state.” Her statement provoked a forceful response from her fellow Democrats, after which she offered a half-hearted apology from which she then retreated. Noah Rothman comments:
It is no coincidence that Democratic support for Israel fell off a cliff between 2019 and 2020, when a Theory of Everything involving racial disparities became vogue inside the Democratic party. The same hyper-racial narrative that led Democrats to support defunding police forces now colors the way in which the party’s activist class views the Israeli conflict. While criticizing Israel isn’t inherently invalid or politically suicidal, the worldview that inspired Jayapal’s remarks is particularly toxic.
To reach their preferred conclusion, Jayapal and the activists for whom she spoke apply a distorted framework to the Israel-Palestinian conflict, reducing its complexities into digestible narratives around power dynamics and identity. Their reductive view holds Israelis to be powerful, moneyed, Europeanized aggressors, while Palestinians are a subjugated, colonized, brown monolith. It is seductive to those looking for clear good guys and bad guys in the conflict, and it has the added efficiency of allowing its believers to apply the same language they would in describing domestic conflicts to this entirely foreign one. It might insult anyone with more than a passing familiarity with the region and its dynamics, to say nothing of those who believe in Israel’s fundamental legitimacy, but tidy narratives are sometimes shallow.
It would be nice if Jayapal’s ill-considered decision to read the stage directions aloud produced a change of heart among Democratic lawmakers, but that is unlikely. What it has done is exposed Democrats’ worries about the ways in which they have antagonized the majority of Americans who support Israel.
Part of the problem seems to be Jayapal’s (and her friends’) complete unfamiliarity with the history of the conflict and the players involved. Forget the fact that the “progressive” caucus refuses to support the only democracy in the Middle East, and the only country in the region with full equality for women, the LGBT community, and freedom for all religions. This entire episode comes in the laughable context of her and several other progressives skipping an address by Israeli President Isaac Herzog to Congress, in an attempt to protest the policies of Prime Minister Netanyahu. None of them seem to be aware that before he was elected to his mostly ceremonial role Herzog served as the left-wing opposition leader against Netanyahu.
Her willful lack of knowledge is also clearly evident in what Jayapal’s “apology” does not say.
First, in her telling of the failures of the two-state solution there is only one party at fault: Israel. There is no mention of or accounting for the dismal leadership of the PA, which has consistently turned down numerous offers for an independent Palestinian state. For the record, Israel has repeatedly, more than 30 times, offered plans for peace and division of the land. Some of those deals, including the Clinton Peace Parameters, were even supported by Jayapal’s own party—along with much of the Arab world. Again, for the Squad’s edification, Israel (legitimately) gained a total of 26,178 square miles of territory in the defensive war of 1967. To date, it has ceded sovereignty over approximately 23,871 square miles or 87% of that territory. At various times in recent history (including deals proposed in 2000, 2008 and 2014), Israel has offered up to 99.3% of the remaining disputed territory in exchange for peace. Each time the Palestinians refused.
Second, while Jayapal’s statement contains vilification of Israel as a whole and its leaders in particular, there is no mention of the PA or its President, Mahmoud Abbas, who have repeatedly confirmed that the PA will use their very last penny if necessary to pay salaries and stipends to incentivize terrorists who kill innocent Americans and Israelis. There’s no mention of the fact that while Israeli schoolchildren are uniformly taught to yearn for peace, Arab schoolchildren in Israel, Gaza and PA controlled cities are taught to glorify war and terrorism, and that under official PA policy they stand to make more money for their families if they grow up to be killers and martyrs rather than doctors or lawyers.
Third, as she made clear in her statement, Jayapal does not understand—and seemingly does not seek to understand—the Israeli point of view on the Arab-Israeli conflict. Contrasting the Jewish people’s historical trauma from pogroms, persecution and the Holocaust with the Palestinians’ feelings of hopelessness about peace, as her statement does, creates a false framework that depicts the debate incorrectly. The suffering of the Jewish people historically has nothing to do with their legitimate claim to the land of Israel, and implying that this generational suffering is all that they bring to their “side” of the “debate”—as opposed to the Palestinians who just want the same rights as their neighbors (which, again, they have)—completely denies the Jewish people’s religious, historic and indigenous ties to the land. The Jewish people’s rightful ownership long predates the United Nations and well precedes the horrors of the Holocaust. No one ever gave Israel to the Jews—certainly not the Palestinians—and no one can ever take her away. Any two-state solution needs to begin with this fundamental understanding that somehow eludes Jayapal: The Jews are in Israel, and always have been, and will continue to be there, by right and not on sufferance.
Palestine Today publishes a story about the heartbreak of a mother in Jenin:
A night of joy awaits Palestinian homes in preparation for the announcement of the results of the 2023 high school diploma exams. However, other homes were darkened and saddened, after their childrenfell to the bullets of the "Israeli" occupation, and they became "martyrs with honors"...
The family of student Majdi Arrawi, 17, did not hang decorations and did not prepare firecrackers, despite expectations of his success in exams. Arrawi is one of three students who were killed by the occupation army’s bullets during the aggression on Jenin camp.
His mother tells Palestine Today, “My heart is burning every day approaching the announcement of high school exam results.
Umm Muhammad, Majdi's mother, indicates that Majdi excelled in his studies, and obtained grades in the 80s during the school years.
"May God honor him with martyrdom"... are words she tries to console herself with, after she was deprived of her son's bosom when he received his results, in which he wished success in order to study, work and help his mother.
Majdi finished sitting the exams on the twenty-eighth of last month, after hardship and exhaustion, in order to obtain a study certificate, to fulfill his dream, and work for the sake of his family, but the family is deprived of this joy because of the treacherous bullets of the Zionist enemy.
Palestine Today is linked to Islamic Jihad.
But the terror wing of Islamic Jihad describes Majdi Arrawi in a much different way.
But children are more valuable as propaganda, as child victims of Zionist aggression after they die, than they ever were as terrorists when they were alive.
Other articles describe how Majdi Arrawi was an orphan whose father died of cancer when he was 11, and he was looking forward to studying engineering in college and supporting his family.
He evidently had other priorities that were more important to him.
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon!
Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424.
Hamas militia and the militants from the Al-Qassam Brigades attacked two members of the Al-Quds Brigades, the military wing of the Jihad Movement, in the city of Rafah.
Eyewitnesses reported that Hamas members stormed the Al-Awda Mosque, which is affiliated with Islamic Jihad, and assaulted the PIJ officials there. One of them, Yahya Mansour, had his hand broken and several other injuries, and another was injured as well.
Islamic Jihad issued a statement saying that they had met with Hamas on Tuesday morning to discuss some apparent (but unspecified) problems they are having with each other, and they thought the meeting went very well. They say they were surprised at the large numbers of Hamas members attacking the mosque.
According to Islamic Jihad's statement, Hamas members assaulted Mansour with chairs, knives and their bare hands, severely beating him. An elderly official was also attacked by them as he tried to defend Mansour, and he sustained serious injuries as well.
There are clearly tensions between Hamas and Islamic Jihad that no one is talking to the media about. And they are both trying to keep their differences quiet. Islamic Jihad's statement ended off with:
Brothers, the sons of this struggle, our weapons are pure, we advise you to restrain your anger and not pay attention to the problems created by some suspicious people and pay attention only to the direction of the Zionist enemy. Our guns are pure, our direction is known, and the compass can only be diverted by the enemies of the resistance.
The only thing that Palestinian groups can agree upon is hating Jews.
But notice how the media simply doesn't want to cover a story about major differences between the two largest armed groups in Gaza. It is almost like they agree with the terror groups that it is better to keep these things private and only attack Israel.
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon!
Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424.
Maria Maalouf is is a Lebanese Christian journalist and writer.
She has been outspoken in her criticism of Hezbollah and Hassan Nasrallah, and she is living in exile in the US.
She just attended the Christians United for Israel conference in Virginia, and posted selfie videos on her Twitter and Instagram, angering many Lebanese and other Arabs on social media.
Her recent posts prompted the Lebanese commissioner to the military court, Judge Fadi Akiki, to accuse Maalouf of crimes violating the law boycotting Israel and of making statements that would stir up sectarian and sectarian strife.
The controversy caused her to become a trending topic in Twitter. So Maalouf tweeted about that too, writing, "Thank you to my followers from Hezbollah. Thank you to all my enemies. If it weren't for you, I wouldn't be trending today #ماريا_معلوف."
Poking Islamists in the eye is something we can all agree is a wonderful thing.
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon!
Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424.
This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For 20 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.
Weekend long read
-
1) The ITIC reports on documents found in the Gaza Strip showing Iranian
support for Hamas. “Hamas documents captured by IDF forces during the...
The pos...
Weekend long read
-
1) The ITIC reports on documents found in the Gaza Strip showing Iranian
support for Hamas. “Hamas documents captured by IDF forces during the...
The pos...
Censor the Internet to Save the Planet
-
“Governments Should Act Now to Curb Climate Disinformation” demands a
letter backed by Greenpeace, the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and the Center
for Count...
A Friend Indeed
-
[image: Dry Bones cartoon, Trump, MAGA, President, Jerusalem, Embassy,
America, Huckabee,]
Welcome Ambassador Huckabee!
* * * And *IT'S TIME FOR YOU TO MAK...
▶ What Is the Crisis at CBS News?
-
View this post on Instagram A post shared by HonestReporting
(@honestreporting) From employing a Gaza producer with terror ties to
forcing journalists ...
An open letter to the police and CPS
-
To the police and CPS. With reference to complaints made by Gabriel
Kanter-Webber about Rupert Nathan. I understand that the matter has now
been referred...
7 Biggest Dungeons In Elder Scrolls Games
-
Please verify your email address. Labyrinthian in Skyrim is a maze of
Nordic ruins with fiends to battle and treasures to find. Sundercliff Watch
in Oblivi...
Gaza: A Brief Modern History Outline
-
Pre-1917 - Gaza part of the Ottoman Empire
1917 - Gaza conquered by British Army and subsequently becomes part of
Mandate Palestine
1948 - Gaza conquere...
One Choice: Fight to Win
-
Yesterday Israel preempted a potentially disastrous attack by Hezbollah on
the center of the country. Thirty minutes before launch time, our aircraft
destr...
Yom Hashoah 5784 – 2024
-
Israel’s Yom Hashoah began at sundown this evening with the annual ceremony
at Yad Vashem with torches lit in memory of the 6 million Jewish victims of
the...
Closing Jews Down Under Website
-
With a heavyish heart I am closing down the website after ten years.
It is and it isn’t an easy decision after 10 years of constant work. The
past...
‘Test & Trace’ is a mirage
-
Lockdown II thoughts: Day 1 Opposition politicians have been banging on
about the need for a ‘working’ Test & Trace system even more loudly than
the govern...