Increasingly, in our Universities, anti-Semitism travels under the guise of pro-Palestinian activism.
...Being Mein Kampf-y is back in vogue and Jews amassed in their homeland are the primary target. Islamic regimes claim the moral high ground by criticising Israel for using disproportionate force to protect state borders while they quietly bankroll illegal armies of jihadis. The use of non-state actors in the place of legitimate armies means Islamic regimes can fund illegal wars while avoiding accountability under international law, at the UN and in the media.
The UN General Assembly will convene for an emergency session this week regarding Gaza. Some Arab states object to Israel defending its borders against Hamas militants. Recent attempts to damn Israel while exculpating terrorists have failed. But they have gained support from powerful countries such as China, whose government rails against colonialism as it colonises international waters.
The Palestinian territories are so radicalised that Hamas governs Gaza. It is the foot soldiers of Islamist terror that you see running for Israel’s borders on the TV news at night. If the accompanying narration is anything to go by, we are supposed to be angry at Israel for gunning down the terrorists trying to invade it. What is the proposed alternative? Should the Israel Defence Forces lay down their arms and let the terrorists invade the only pluralistic democracy in the Middle East?
Israel was always going to be a risky venture. Theoretically, it secures a safe haven for Jews after centuries of persecution. However, their concentration in a small territory in a neighbourhood of Islamic states poses a significant threat.
Increasingly, anti-Semitism travels under the guise of pro-Palestinian activism. While it is possible to argue for the two-state solution and against Israeli policy without being anti-Semitic, it is dangerously naive to ignore the intent of Palestinian jihadis to enact the final solution by wiping Israel off the map.
Dangerously naive is the default position of progressive populists in relation to Israel. The alt-left champions jihadis while denouncing democracies. Many seem unaware of what they are defending when they criticise Israel’s national security measures.
Student activists [at the University of Sydney] have struck another blow for tyranny by celebrating a female suicide bomber who killed Israelis.
The student women’s collective at the University of Sydney featured Hamida al-Taher on the front page of campus newspaper Honi Soit. The edition was dedicated to the struggle against “Israeli colonisation”. The collective described her as a martyr. One may reason that a young woman being used as a bomb for jihad is cause for condemnation, not celebration. But the sisterhood between jihadis and Western feminism is no place for reason.
But he was mostly unarmed
In other words, it’s a reasonable calculation that for the majority of the day, he was “unarmed.” By the logic of the journalists who cover Israel, then, they should report that that the axe-wielder was another “mostly unarmed” civilian, a “protester” or “demonstrator” who had harmed nobody.A talk by Tom Gross on Israel and the media, and how Israeli PR could be improved (Feb 9, 2010)
I also expect journalists to try to cast doubt on whether he was even carrying the axe. They will probably write that the Israelis “claimed” or “alleged” he was carrying it, but there’s no proof. After all, since when do Palestinian terrorists carry axes?
I would bet that the residents of nearby Kibbutz Nirim, who were right in the path of the axe terrorist, have some sense of what lay in store for them if the Israeli soldiers had not shot him.
I doubt anybody at the kibbutz has forgotten about the terrorists who used an axe to butcher the five rabbis in the Har Nof (Jerusalem) synagogue, or Michael Nadler, the young man from Miami Beach whom axe-wielding terrorists butchered on the Golan Heights. They haven’t forgotten the Bat Ayin axe attack or the Ma’ale Adumim axe attack, the axe attacks in Afula and in the Old City of Jerusalem, and all the rest, far too numerous to list here.
But the journalists won’t mention any of that in their articles. Not because they don’t believe Palestinian terrorists have used axes. But because hiding that fact advances the Palestinian agenda. Most journalists want to see Israel forced to accept the creation of a Palestinian state along Israel’s nine-miles-wide border.
Anything that would cast doubt on the Palestinians’ nature or intentions could strengthen opposition to creating such a state.
And that’s why the media pretend that Palestinian terrorists are “mostly unarmed”—even when they are armed with the same deadly weapons that have been used by so many terrorists before them.
* “A fascinating lecture by Tom Gross, well worth watching. Even though it is from a few years ago, it is still just as relevant today and has lessons for us all.” -- William Shawcross, CVO, British writer and former Chairman of the Charity Commission. * “This is a great talk by Tom Gross – journalists and diplomats alike should watch it” -- Evgeny Kissin, leading Russian-born classical concert pianist * Tom Gross: “The media coverage of the Mideast is even worse than we think it is.” Tom Gross is a former Mideast correspondent for the London Sunday Telegraph and New York Daily News, and a contributor to The Guardian and Wall Street Journal.