Disclaimer: the views expressed here are solely those of the author, weekly Judean Rose columnist Varda Meyers Epstein.On February 14, Rashida
Tlaib refused to support a resolution denouncing Hamas for raping and
sexually violating and mutilating Jewish men, women, and children. The only
member of the House of Representatives who voted present instead of voting for the resolution, Tlaib
said she condemns all sexual violence, but claimed that H. Res. 966, Condemning
rape and sexual violence committed by Hamas in its war against Israel, “completely
ignores and erases any sexual violence and abuse committed by the Israeli
forces against Palestinians, especially children.”
This, of course, is a lie. On many levels. For one thing, the
resolution is broad and inclusive, condemning all rape and sexual violence as
weapons of war (emphasis added):
That the House of Representatives—
(1) condemns all rape and forms of sexual violence as
weapons of war, including those acts committed by Hamas terrorists on and
since October 7th;
(2) calls on all nations to criminalize rape and sexual
assault, and hold accountable all perpetrators of sexual violence,
including state and non-state armed groups;
(3) calls on all international bodies to unequivocally
condemn the barbaric murder, rape, sexual assault, and kidnapping by Hamas and
other terrorists on and since October 7th, and hold accountable all
perpetrators;
(4) reaffirms the United States Government’s support for
independent, impartial investigations of rape and sexual violence committed by
Hamas on and since October 7th; and
(5) reaffirms its commitment to supporting survivors of
rape and sexual violence, including those brutalized on and since October
7.
Tlaib could have happily signed on, knowing that the
resolution includes every act of rape and every act of sexual violence no
matter the parties responsible for these heinous crimes. But that would not
have served Tlaib’s true aims, all of which she accomplished:
* She inserted a new idea: that the IDF also commits rape
and sexual violence. This is a lie.
* She inserted a second new idea: that IDF soldiers are
pedophiles who specifically prey on and prefer to rape and commit sexual
violence against Arab children. This too, is a lie.
* She inserted a third new idea: The resolution does not specifically
focus on children as victims of Hamas rape and sexual violence. In accusing the IDF
of pedophilia, Tlaib intimates that IDF soldiers are
actually worse than actual (Hamas) terrorists. Absolutely false and also
repugnant.
* She created a false equivalence between perpetrator and
victim—Hamas committed rape and sexual violence on October 7th,
and has continued since that time to rape and violate Jewish men, women, and
children. The assertion that the IDF also engages in such atrocities is false
and also abhorrent, since the war on Hamas is a defensive war, a direct response
to Hamas rape and sexual violence.
* She inverted the truth. The oldest Arab trick in the
book: she accused the Jews of doing what they, the Arabs do. There was
no rape or sexual violence by the IDF. The atrocities were committed by one
side alone and that one side was Hamas.
The Arab enemy plays dirty. It cheats and it lies and it
inverts the truth. But we know what happened. “The evidence is abundant and
beyond compelling. Through survivors coming forward, witnesses, video footage
and independent analysis, we know that Hamas’s use of sexual violence including
rape, mutilation, and brutality was not an anomaly. It was a premeditated part
of its strategy to purposefully use sexual violence as a weapon against
innocent civilians,” said Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, regarding
the horrific sexual crimes of Hamas.
Meanwhile, there are no credible reports that similar deeds, or worse, have been perpetrated by the IDF. But with her lies Tlaib offers up new
ways to demonize the Jews, with new lines of propaganda for use by the legions
of ugly-minded people siding with terrorists against the Jewish victims.
Antisemites don’t care about truth or proof. In their minds, all’s fair in
their hatred and envy of the Jewish people.
The Arab tactic of inverting the truth unlike Tlaib's fake
"facts" is not new. A 2007
essay by Joel Fishman goes into the history and use of the "inversion
of reality" as he calls it, appropriately begins with the following
(ancient) verse:
Woe unto them that call evil good, And good evil;
That change darkness into light, And light into darkness;
That change bitter into sweet, And sweet into bitter.
Isaiah 5:20
A summary of the essay appearing just below these lines
makes clear that inversion of the truth is a propaganda tactic designed to be
used against the Jewish people (emphasis added):
From the 1960s, inversion of truth and reality has been one
the most favored propaganda methods of Israel‘s adversaries. One of its
most frequent expressions has been the accusation that the Jewish people,
victims of the Nazis, have now become the new Nazis, aggressors and oppressors
of the Palestinian Arabs. Contemporary observers have identified this method
and described it as an “inversion of reality,” an “intellectual confidence
trick,” “reversing moral responsibility,” or “twisted logic.”
Because Israel’s enemies have, for nearly half a century, repeated such
libels without being challenged, they have gradually gained credence. Since
inversion of reality constitutes the basic principle of current anti-Israeli
propaganda, it is important to understand what it is and how it works. This
propaganda method is a product of Nazi Germany. It is totalitarian both in
its methods, particularly the use of the paranoiac myth, and in the absolute
solution it advocates. It totally denies all of Israel’s claims and leaves
no room for introspection and compromise.
Why is it necessary to invert the truth? Because the truth
does not serve the cause of those responsible for spreading twisted logic, the
desire to demonize and ultimately, to do away with the Jewish people:
One of the tactical tools of ideological warfare is
propaganda, which has been defined simply “as an attempt to influence the
attitudes of a specific audience through the use of facts, fiction, argument or
suggestion-often supported by the suppression of inconsistent material-with the
calculated purpose of instilling in the recipient a certain belief, values or
convictions which will serve the interests of the source, by producing a
desired line of action.”
To this definition one may add the statement of Dr. Joseph
Goebbels that “propaganda as such is neither good nor evil. Its moral value is
determined by the goals it seeks.” Here is the classical argument that the ends
justify the means. One may ask, however, if in certain cases the very means can
be morally defective.
The rise of technology and social media has made spreading
lies easier than ever, making the inversion of truth the perfect tactic for
modern-day antisemites, for instance Arab propagandists like Tlaib, who have infiltrated
the US government. Seventeen years have passed since this essay was penned, yet
the ideas and tactics outlined here remains remarkably current (emphasis added):
Inversion of reality as a tool of media war, with its
paranoiac state of mind, has persisted to the present. Although contemporary
observers have been able to describe its manifestations with considerable
accuracy, many have not placed it in historical context. It was in this sense,
for example, that the French researcher and philosopher Pierre-André Taguieff
applied the term “absolute anti-Semitism” to describe the post-1967 outlook of
the Palestinians. He wrote that for them, “Zionism, then, is a new ‘Nazism’
threatening to dominate and destroy the whole human species…. Thus, in a
context where Western elites never tire of calling for the avoidance of
‘Islamophobic’ utterances, the head of the Islamic Center in Geneva, Hani
Ramadan, coolly denounced ‘the genocide being organized against the Muslims.’”
It is noteworthy that Ramadan’s story line is nearly
identical to that of Nazi propagandists. Both presented themselves as targets
of a Jewish conspiracy, and the potential outcome of their “logical process”-to
use Hannah Arendt’s expression-was genocide. Although both have inverted the
truth, their assertions contain an additional feature which is disturbing
and dangerous: the inversion of morality which leads to criminal behavior and
violence without constraint.
Citing Melanie Phillips as his source, Fishman now quotes
Leo McKinstry, a Belfast-born author and journalist who described the inversion
of reality with regard to Israel, as it plays out in British public discourse (emphasis
added):
In a remarkable inversion of reality, Israel has become a
pariah state because of its determination to defend itself. A grotesque
double standard now operates, where murderous Arab terrorists are hailed as
“freedom fighters” yet Israeli security forces are treated as fascistic thugs.
No nation has been more demonized than Israel. One recent survey across Europe
revealed that Israel is now regarded as “the greatest threat” to world peace,
an utter absurdity given that Israel is actually the only democratic, free
society in the Middle East. But such a finding reflects the strength of the
hysterical anti-Israeli propaganda that fills the airwaves of Europe. No matter
how much this anti-Israeli feeling is dressed up as support for Palestine, it
is in fact profoundly antisemitic….
It is clear that nothing has changed since 2007, except for
it being easier than ever to invert the truth and spread antisemitic lies
whether in Britain or DC—or anywhere else where there are people who don’t like
Jews. The Arab inversion of truth, however, really hits its stride beginning in
the 1960s:
Prof. Arnold Toynbee delivered a lecture in Montreal in
January 1961 in which he “compared from a moral standpoint, the attitude of
Israel to the Arabs in 1947 and 1948 with the Nazi slaughter of six million
Jews.” The ambassador of Israel to Canada, Yaakov Herzog, read this
statement in the Montreal newspapers and challenged Toynbee to a debate which
followed on 31 January 1961 at McGill University. Ambassador Herzog did well in
this disputation, but it is not clear if Arnold Toynbee’s statement represented
an isolated event or, in the years which followed, provided a source of
inspiration to others. (Two years later, in April 1964, Arnold Toynbee came to
Egypt on a twelve day visit to lecture at Egyptian universities. It would
be interesting to know, if, beyond considerations of academic scholarship, an
authoritarian regime such as Nasser’s Egypt had other motives for showing
Toynbee such a public sign of great favor.)
During the 1960s, and particularly after the Israeli victory
in the Six Day War in 1967, the Soviet Union and its allies in the Arab world
reintroduced some of the old propaganda themes. Israel’s victory represented a
humiliation to the Soviet cause and posed an internal danger because it shook
the foundations of authority. Domestically, it heartened the minorities
in the Soviet Union, not least the Jews. Having suffered a major reverse, the
Soviet Union and the Arab countries decided to use political anti-Semitism as a
means of shifting world attention from their defeat. They endeavored to
delegitimize Israel, to brand Israel as the aggressor, and to bring about its
isolation. Some elements of the new propaganda campaign were:
·
The accusation that Israel
was the aggressor in the Six Day War and denial of its right to self-defense.
·
The passing of UN General
Assembly Resolution 3379, “Zionism is racism,” on 10 November 1975 which gave
the standing of international law to a proposition totally based on the
inversion of reality. This resolution transformed Zionism, the Jewish national
movement, into the embodiment of evil by equating it with the depravity of Nazi
Germany.
·
The drafting of the PLO
Covenant in its various versions of 1964, 1968, and 1974. This document claimed
that justice was totally on the Palestinian side and that Israel had no
standing at all.
·
The Hamas Charter of 1988.
·
The unprecedented assault
on Israel at the end of August and beginning of September 2001 which took place
at the UN Conference in Durban.
The UN Resolution of 1975, later overturned, declaring that “Zionism
is racism,” is another prime and historic example of how truth can be stood on
its head in order to demonize the Jews (emphasis added):
On 10 November 1975, the Soviet Union and its supporters
passed UN General Assembly Resolution 3379, “Zionism is racism,” which
transformed an anti-Semitic slogan into an internationally accepted “truth.”
Rabbis Abraham Cooper and Harold Brackman explained that “the term ‘racism’ was
coined in 1936 to rally scientific and political opinion against Nazi doctrines
of ‘Aryan superiority’ over Jews and other alleged untermenschen.”
According to the original meaning of the term, then, “racism” denotes one of
the great abuses of Nazism. Thus, to equate Zionism with racism
represents a serious accusation and inversion of reality.
In considering the tactic of reality inversion, once must also
look at the results. The academic in his ivory tower knows the truth, but
pushes the lies that serve him. The common man on the other hand, the regular
Arab Joe/Yussef on the street, actually believes the lies. He wants to believe
the lies, because they put him in the right and the Jews in the wrong. Nadav
Shragai describes the impact on ordinary Arab Muslims of the lie that the
Jews aim to destroy the al-Aqsa mosque (emphasis added):
The Palestinians and many Muslims charge that Israel “seeks
to destroy al-Aqsa” and build the Temple in its stead on a site where no Temple
ever stood; that the Jewish Temple on the Temple Mount is al-miza’um, that is,
“supposed,” “fraudulent,” “invented,” or “imaginary;” that the Jews have no
connection to the Temple Mount or, for that matter, to the Western Wall.
This is a libel on top of a libel, a double lie. The many
Muslims who are convinced that al-Aqsa is in danger are now also convinced that
“their” al-Aqsa stands on a place where “our” Temple never stood – the latter
being nothing but a fabrication.
Some of the legitimacy that terrorism draws from the libel
rests on that added lie. It is more legitimate to libel and murder Jews, so as
“to protect the captive al-Aqsa and free it from the Jews who are plotting to
destroy it,” if Israel and the Jews who “conspire to attack the site,” have
only a false and concocted connection to it. Thus, the lie that undergirds
the libel also bolsters the legitimacy to murder in its name. From the
standpoint of the “Al-Aqsa is in danger” terrorists and their supporters, they
do not murder only those who seek to wrest the Mount from their hands. As they
see it, they are also murdering the falsifiers of history, who have no link to
the site at all. They also want the Mount to be “liberated” psychologically
so that their historical and religious narrative will prevail.
Already a decade ago, Lesley
Klaff described how the Holocaust has been appropriated by the enemy, and distorted
and abused to blame and demonize Israel for the condition of the Arab people
(emphasis added):
What has been called ‘Holocaust Inversion’ involves an
inversion of reality (the Israelis are cast as the ‘new’ Nazis and the
Palestinians as the ‘new’ Jews), and an inversion of morality (the Holocaust is
presented as a moral lesson for, or even a moral indictment of ‘the Jews’).
More: those who object to these inversions are told [that] they are acting in
bad faith, only being concerned to deflect criticism of Israel. In short, the
Holocaust, an event accurately described by Dan Diner as a ‘rupture in
civilisation,’ organised by a regime that, as the political philosopher Leo
Strauss observed, ‘had no other clear principle except murderous hatred of the
Jews,’ is now being used, instrumentally, as a means to express animosity towards
the homeland of the Jews. ‘The victims have become perpetrators’ is being
heard more and more. That is Holocaust Inversion.
Klaff goes further, underlining the ways in which even the
memory of the Holocaust is abused, as it places unique moral strictures on the
Jewish people—the actual victims of the Holocaust—alone:
Holocaust Inversion [involves] the abuse of the Holocaust
memory to issue a moral stricture aimed at Israel and ‘the Jews’,
imposing upon them a uniquely onerous moral responsibility and
accountability in their treatment of others.
Dr.
Yechiel Shabiy, writing for BESA, elaborates on the inverted logic that portrays
the Arabs as indigenous to Israel even in the face of absolute proof to the
contrary (emphasis added):
The elected representatives of Israel’s Arab community claim
that the Palestinians are the original owners of the land—an indigenous
minority disinherited by foreign invaders. According to this notion,
which is aimed at undermining the Zionist narrative about the Jewish
people’s return to its historical homeland, the Arabs of the Land of
Israel—like the Indians in America, the aborigines in Australia, and the Zulu
tribes in South Africa—are victims of European imperialism/colonialism, which
turned them into a disenfranchised and oppressed minority in their own land. From
this standpoint, Zionism is a crude perversion of Judaism because the Jews do
not constitute a people but only a religious community with no national
attributes or aspirations, let alone any right to a state of their own in even
a tiny part of the Islamic-Arab-Palestinian patrimony.
That thesis is not only baseless but a complete inversion of
the historical truth.
It was Arab/Muslim invaders who came to the Land of
Israel as an ascendant imperialist force in the decade after the Prophet
Muhammad’s death and laid the groundwork for the colonization of this land by a
long string of Muslim empires up to the fall of the Ottoman Empire at the end
of WWI. During this lengthy era, the non-Jewish and non-Christian residents of
the land identified themselves as Muslims—not as Arabs, and certainly not as
Palestinians—until WWI, when the idea of Arab nationalism gathered steam with
the help of British imperialism.
One need only look at common family names among the
Palestinians to see their colonialist origins: Hijazi, from the Hijaz in the
Arabian Peninsula, from which the original invaders came; Bosniak, from Bosnia;
Turk, from Turkey; Halabi, from Syria; Hindi, from India; Yemeni, from Yemen;
Masarwa/Masri, from Egypt; Mughrabi, from the Maghreb, and so on.
In contrast, countless place names in the Land of Israel
testify to a Jewish presence over thousands of years. Take, for example, the
Narbeta River in northern Samaria. Narbeta, which is the Aramaic pronunciation
of Arubot, the biblical city in which one of King Solomon’s 12 governors lived,
ruled the whole region of northern Samaria. In Narbeta, as Yosef ben Matityahu
(Josephus) recounts, the Romans slaughtered thousands of Jews during the Great
Revolt (66-73 CE). The area teems with archaeological relics from the Second
Temple, Mishnaic, and Talmudic eras.
Each year, Israel is faced with the dilemma of whether to
allow Muslim worship on the Temple Mount during Ramadan. With the season upon
us, concurrent with Israel’s war on Hamas, the issue was once more discussed and
decided: The Arabs are to be allowed to worship on the Temple Mount, in spite
of the war and the Arab propensity for violence with the Jews as their target. When
Israel was confronted by the same yearly conundrum in 2022, David Weinberg took
the opportunity to outline some of the more inflammable
Arab rhetoric batted about in regard to Jews and the Temple Mount along
with the history of how it has evolved (emphasis added):
I am infuriated by the calls of Western leaders upon Israel,
all week long, to "ensure the status quo" on the Temple Mount
and "respect the sanctity" of its Moslem holy sites. Often
this has been accompanied by tsk-tsking about "provocative incursions"
by Israeli police and so-called "excessive force" employed by
police to disburse "peaceful Arab worshippers."
The inversion of truth contained in the above description of
events and the perversion involved in blaming Israel for Arab rioting on the
Temple Mount – is utterly galling!
The plain facts are that the so-called "status
quo" on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem long has been dead. It has been
violated repeatedly in recent years by radical Palestinian and Islamic actors
who have turned the Mount into a base of hostile operations against Israel, instead
of protecting it as zone of prayer and peace. Israel, on the other hand, has
acted with utmost restraint in the face of Arab assaults. (Too much restraint,
in my opinion.)
Waqf and Islamic movement provocateurs have attacked Jewish
visitors to the Mount, Jewish worshipers at the Western Wall below the Mount,
and Jewish worshippers on their way to the Western Wall. They have attacked
Emiratis and Bahrainis praying in Al-Aqsa Mosque (because these countries
signed Abraham Accord peace treaties). They have greatly restricted visitation
rights to the holy Mount for all non-Moslems; and have hijacked the pulpits in
the mosque on the Mount to preach hatred and violence against Israel.
Palestinian terrorists have smuggled machine guns onto the
Temple Mount and killed police guarding the gates of the Mount. The terrorists
launched their attack from within the Temple Mount and then fled into the
shrines on the Mount. The tens of thousands of boulders and rocks stockpiled by
Arabs on the Mount for their periodic, planned "outbursts" of
rock-throwing violence, including repeated attacks over the past week, are no
less outrageous.
The Waqf also has conducted vast, illegal construction
projects on the Mount and beneath it, willfully destroying centuries of Jewish
archaeological treasures.
Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas, a supposedly
"moderate" Palestinian figure, continues to roil the waters and
foment violence against Israel by repeating the canard that "Al Aqsa is
in danger," meaning that "the Zionists are conspiring to blow-up
the mosque and Islamic shrine" on the Mount. This is a blood libel that
goes all the way back to the notorious pro-Nazi Arab leader Haj Amin
al-Husseini in the pre-state period.
In fact, Abbas has stoked a broad-scale campaign against the
authenticity of Israel's historic rights in Jerusalem. In September 2015 he
screeched about "filthy" Jewish feet that were
"desecrating" holy Islamic and Christian holy sites in Jerusalem.
"Al-Aksa is ours and so is the Church of the Holy Sepulcher," he
bellowed. "They (the Jews) have no right to desecrate them with their
filthy feet. We won't allow them to do so, and we will do whatever we can to
defend Jerusalem."
In 2019, Tzvi Fleischer wrote of the UN inversion of the truth in regard to the
status of Arab women, be they Arab women with Israeli citizenship, or those who live under Abbas or Hamas (emphasis added):
The UN has produced another one of the anti-Israel
absurdities for which it has become infamous. On July 23, the UN’s 54-nation
Economic and Social Council voted 40-2, with 9 abstentions, to single out
Israel as the only state in the world branded as a violator of women’s rights.
Among those who voted in favour were such paragons of women’s rights as Saudi
Arabia, Iran, Pakistan, and Yemen (Australia is not a member).
Most of the long resolution said nothing about women but
simply parroted generic UN anti-Israel rhetoric, accusing the Jewish state of
numerous crimes, but the key clause condemned Israel and the
“occupation” as “a major obstacle for Palestinian women and girls with regard
to the fulfilment of their rights, and their advancement, self-reliance and
integration in the development of their society.”
Of course, the resolution did not mention
how Palestinian women’s rights are impacted by their own governing authorities—the
Palestinian Authority and Hamas. These surely have the primary responsibility
for progressing the “advancement, self-reliance and integration” of the
Palestinian women of the West Bank and Gaza respectively.
Yet with regard to the situation of the Palestinian women
who are citizens of Israel, recent years have seen achievements which make a
mockery of the UN’s claims. A decade ago only 22% of Israeli Arab women were
working outside their homes. Today, that number is more than 40%
(admittedly, this is still way below the workforce participation rate of Jewish
Israeli women, who have one of the highest participation rates in the OECD).
The jump in employment rates among Israeli Arab women is
in part the result of deliberate Israeli Government policy. The Israeli
Government has set a target of 54% employment for Arab women by 2030. To help
achieve that goal, they have been improving public transport to Arab villages
so women can reach jobs, building industrial zones in large Arab towns like
Nazareth that can offer employment closer to Arab villages and have set up 22
employment centres specifically for Arab women to help match them with
available jobs.
The UN is still busy inverting the truth when it comes to Israel
and the Jews. CNN
reports that UN is investigating “credible reports” that IDF soldiers did to
Arabs the disgusting things that Arabs did to Jews (emphasis added):
United Nations experts have called for an investigation into
what they described as “credible allegations of egregious human rights
violations” against Palestinian women and girls in Gaza and the West Bank by
Israeli forces.
The allegations include extrajudicial killing, arbitrary
detention, degrading treatment, rape and sexual violence, according to a
statement by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights released
on Monday. It did not detail how they did their fact-finding, but they referred
to photos of female detainees in degrading circumstances reportedly taken by
Israeli troops and uploaded online.
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) denied the accusations and
said it adheres to international law. “Without precise details or proof of individual
cases it is not possible for us to examine them in depth,” the IDF said in a
statement to CNN.
i24
News further elaborates (emphasis added):
The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights has
accused the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) of raping Palestinian women and girls
in detention, sparking a contentious dispute as Israel vehemently denies the
claims.
In a report by Sky News, the UN Human Rights Office a few
reports of Israeli officers allegedly sexually assaulting Palestinian women and
girls while in detention.
Allegations include strip searches conducted by male
soldiers and alleged instances of sexual violence against detainees.
“We are particularly disturbed by reports that Palestinian
women and girls in detention have been subjected to several forms of sexual
assault,” accused the UN agency, affirming that “they had been stripped naked
and searched by male soldiers.” “At least two Palestinian detainees were
raped, while others were threatened with rape and sexual violence,” the agency
said, adding that “photos of detention in humiliating circumstances were taken
by the IDF and uploaded on the Internet".
Naturally, no proof is provided. Because there is none. Yet,
Reem Alsalem, she of the Muslim Arab-friendly first and surname insists that
Israeli violence against Arab women has been “normalized,” and that anyway, the
women don’t speak out because they’re afraid of “reprisals” (emphasis added):
The panel of experts said there was evidence of [at]
least two cases of rape, alongside other cases of sexual humiliation and
threats of rape. Reem Alsalem, the UN special rapporteur on violence against
women and girls, said the true extent of sexual violence could be
significantly higher.
“We might not know for a long time what the actual number of
victims are,” said Alsalem, who was appointed special rapporteur by the UN
Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in 2021.
She noted that reticence in reporting sexual assault was
common because of the fear of reprisals against victims. She said that in a
wave of detentions of Palestinian women and girls after the outbreak of the
Israel-Hamas war on 7 October, there was an increasingly permissive attitude
towards sexual assault in Israeli detention centres.
“I would say that, on the whole, violence and
dehumanisation of Palestinian women and children and civilians has been
normalised throughout this war,” Alsalem said.
Interestingly, Alsalem claimed to be unaware of any rocket
attacks against Israel. In spite of actual evidence, something she does not
have in regard to imagined Israeli crimes against Arab women.
Perhaps the most galling part of this concerted effort to invert
reality was the insertion of a supposed need to investigate reports of imagined
Israeli crimes against Arab women, in a UN investigation of actual Hamas sexual
crimes against Jewish women (and men and children).
In a piece called UN Investigator: ‘Convincing
Information’ of Rape and Torture, But Check the Jews Too Just In Case, the Jewish
Press, author David Israel tells us that while "Pramila Patten, the UN
Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict reported on Monday that
she and a team of experts had found 'clear and convincing information' of rape
and sexualized torture being committed against hostages seized during the
October 7 terror attacks.”
Based on reports in the media, when Patten arrived in
Israel, I was encouraged that even though, as a UN representative, Patten was
unlikely to be sympathetic to Israel, she would be fair in her investigation.
And she was. Up to a point. That point being the one where Arab guilt must be
balanced by the presumption of Jewish guilt, even in the absence of proof
(emphasis added):
The NY Times report on Patten’s report points out
that it “also cited allegations that Palestinians detained by Israel have
also been sexually abused.” No need to provide citations, of course,
because it’s a known thing that Jews rape Arab women all the time. The fact
is that from 1950 to this day there hasn’t been a single rape complaint of an
Arab woman against Israeli soldiers. Several academic researchers have actually
argued that this phenomenon is an expression of Israeli racism…
According to Israel Police data, between 2007 and 2014,
Arab men committed 533 sexual offenses against Jewish women, of which 70 were
outright rapes. In many cases, the rapists called their victims “dirty Jews,”
later explaining that “Jews are subhuman,” and “Jewish girls have no honor.”
Oh, and the Patten report for some reason noted deep
suspicion among Israelis toward the United Nations.
Shocking.
The Patten report was disheartening, because my expectations
had been higher than they should have been. By now, I should know better. Where
there is proof of Arab malfeasance and no proof of Jewish malfeasance, the idea
of Jewish malfeasance will be inserted to minimize that of the Arabs. It’s just
the way it is.
Since October 7, world Jewry has woken up to the fact that
there is overwhelming Jew-hatred everywhere. It doesn’t matter what we’ve done
or haven’t done. It doesn’t matter what we do or don’t do. We Jews live in a time
where the truth doesn’t matter, because it doesn’t serve our enemy, which is
most of the world.
|
 Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon!
Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424.
Read all about it here!
|
|
Wednesday, May 15, 2024
