This article examines homemaking as an important, yet understudied, response to settler colonialism. While there is growing interest in settler colonialism, defined by the colonial settlers’ drive to replace the Indigenous population, existing literature does not adequately address the response of its victims. This article highlights the resistance patterns of an Indigenous society facing a unique form of differential settler colonialism. Settler colonial projects adapt to their contexts, employing various means to facilitate the replacement of the Indigenous society. Exploring how Indigenous peoples engage in homemaking provides valuable insights into their resistance strategies. We outline three dimensions of homemaking as resistance: Return versus Displacement, Preservation versus Erasure, and Authentication versus Appropriation of Indigeneity. These dimensions do not encompass all strategies of resistance to all forms of settler colonialism. However, they contribute to a deeper understanding of its dynamics and promote a new theoretical model of homemaking as a resistance strategy.
This is all absurd. It assumes at the outset that Israel is a settler colonial state and that it is hellbent on erasing all Arab culture. The premise is wrong to begin with - the very existence of the Museum of Islamic Art, the significant amount of Arab and Islamic exhibits at the Israel Museum and Israel's preservation of Islamic buildings even at Judaism's holiest places show that Israel acts to preserve all cultures, not replace them.
Purchasing homes in mixed cities or cities established for the Jewish settler society is a key homemaking practice that reflects the Palestinian return process. It is important to distinguish that while some of the Palestinian presence in cities now defined as mixed, such as Haifa, Acre, Lydda, Ramle, and Jaffa, is a historical presence that predates the establishment of Israel in 1948, there is a growing trend of Palestinian families relocating from villages to these cities. This phenomenon, referred to in research as “internal migration”, reflects a form of return.Does anyone really think Arabs want to move to mixed cities as a form of "return"? It is where the jobs and better schools are! If Israeli society was as racist as the authors presume, then moving to these cities would be prevented by the Jews.
"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024) PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022) |
![]() |
