We've seen how Israel haters
change the definition of terms like "genocide" and "apartheid" just to be able to accuse Israel of those crimes.
Another one is "hospital destroyed."
It seems obvious that when a hospital is destroyed, it can no longer function without being rebuilt. No construction materials are being brought into Gaza.
Yet hospitals that Hamas, the media and NGOs report as "destroyed" by Israel somehow keep treating patients.
The Kamal Adwan Hospital that Israel is now falsely being accused of "burning" was called "destroyed" a year ago. And the
source was none other than the respected World Health Organization.
Yet it was functioning earlier this month. Perhaps between the pieces of rubble.
Don't forget that the Al Ahli hospital was "destroyed" by Israel in October 2023 before it was discovered
not to even have been attacked.
That hospital was also the "only functioning hospital in northern Gaza" over the summer according to
the same Al Jazeera. It's a miracle!
In the new vernacular, the words "damaged" and "closed" have been replaced with "destroyed." This redefinition is happening consistently and deliberately. So when Hamas terrorists hide in hospitals, fire at Israeli troops from hospitals, and the IDF fires back at those specific locations from which they were attacked, the media and UN and NGOs are quick to describe the entire hospitals as "destroyed."
"Destroyed" hospitals cannot function. Damaged hospitals can. And the reason for damage is that terrorists use them as their base for operations.
Israel (and others) have provided lots of
documented evidence that these hospitals are being
used by Hamas and
Islamic Jihad - yet the same media and NGOs never mention that, only blaming Israel for the damage to the hospitals and claiming that Israel has no valid reason to attack.
Words themselves are being weaponized against Israel.