Kannywood embattled actress, Rahama Sadau will be appearing in a sharia court in Kaduna over allegations of blasphemy levelled against her after sharing racy photos on social media.
Rahama Sadau is allegedly under police investigation after the racy photos she shared triggered blasphemous comments.
It was gathered that the investigation is linked to the blasphemous comment on the Holy Prophet Mohammed the racy photos incited.
According to a press release signed by Lawal Muhammad Gusau on behalf of the Concerned and Peace-Loving Muslim Ummah, listed some conditions that must be met before she defends herself.
It was also noted that the case against her “is a matter relating to the Hadiths of the Prophet and the Glorious Holy Qur’an and not a matter relating to the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria”.
It would be bad enough if the photos themselves got Sadau to be summoned to a sharia court, but in this case she is being charged with blasphemy for the comment by someone else on her photos!
When Rahama Sadau posted the photo on November 1, Islamic conservatives in Nigeria criticized her, and others defended her. Apparently someone complained to the sharia court and the best excuse they could find to bring her before the court was to accuse her of blasphemy.
The man who made the blasphemous comments is not even mentioned in news articles, nor is there any indication that he is being arrested or summoned to court.
Even more outrageous, the person who brought the complaint against Sadau said that she should be arrested because her photo might cause riots - mentioning another case of a singer earlier this year whose house was burned down after he posted a video on WhatsApp that was supposedly blasphemous. The criminals aren't charged.
In 2016, Sadau was accused of indecency after a music video of her doing little more than holding hands with a man was released. She was blacklisted from the Nigerian movie industry for two years after that.
The charge of blasphemy in Nigeria is treated with kid gloves by Amnesty and Human Rights Watch. If a political figure is charged with blasphemy, then they cover the story as political repression. The charge of blasphemy itself - a gross violation of the human right of free speech - is not criticized by these supposed human rights groups at all. Not a word was written by HRW or Amnesty about the singer mentioned above or a 13-year old boy sentenced to ten years in prison for blasphemy in Nigeria in October.
Here is a case of clear sexism, injustice and violation of freedom of speech that the major human rights organizations will not talk about because they do not want to be labeled "Islamophobic."
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For 20 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.
Weekend long read
-
1) At the INSS, Tammy Caner analyses ‘Trends and Challenges in Humanitarian
Assistance to the Gaza Strip’. “The UN and its agencies have joined the...
Th...
700 days
-
Dry Bones Golden Oldies in the fond memory of Yaakov Kirschen (Dry Bones).
Brought to you by Sali, the LSW.
It has been 700 days today that our hostages...
August 2025
-
August 5, The Jewish Chronicle: BBC Arabic interviewed Palestinian singer
who appeared to defend Bibas kidnappers The BBC’s Arabic channel
interviewed a ...
Hamas Also Hoarding All The Ozempic
-
The profile of users calling the reports lies revealed candidates for
Ozempic prescriptions.
The post Hamas Also Hoarding All The Ozempic first appeared ...
HR on X: Our Top Posts for August 2025
-
With an ever-growing social media presence, HonestReporting is active on X
(formerly Twitter), where journalists, opinion formers, and influencers
are. Her...
Jonathan Sacks: Letting Go of Hate Ki Teitse
-
[image: Jonathan Sacks: Letting Go of Hate Ki Teitse] Jonathan Sacks:
Letting Go of Hate Ki Teitse IsraelSeen.com
Jonathan Sacks: Letting Go of Hate Ki Tei...
What did 'colonization' mean in the 1920s?
-
One of the sleights-of-language employed by pro-Arab propagandists to
"prove" that Zionism is colonialism is that the Zionist themselves used
that term. ...
Now What?
-
Today, Jews cannot walk down the street in North America, Europe, or even
Australia without the possibility of being spat on, beaten, or even
murdered. Cou...
Closing Jews Down Under Website
-
With a heavyish heart I am closing down the website after ten years.
It is and it isn’t an easy decision after 10 years of constant work. The
past...
‘Test & Trace’ is a mirage
-
Lockdown II thoughts: Day 1 Opposition politicians have been banging on
about the need for a ‘working’ Test & Trace system even more loudly than
the govern...