Thursday, August 21, 2025

By Forest Rain

Ditza Or makes many secular people uncomfortable.

Her clothing marks her as a religious Jew, which, for some, is unsettling in itself. But it isn’t her appearance that disturbs—it’s her words.

Ditza’s son, Avinatan, is being held hostage in Gaza. To most of the world, he is known as Noa Argamani’s boyfriend—the handsome man who, though bigger than his captors, chose to walk into captivity beside Noa because he hoped to protect her.

Noa’s scream of terror, arms stretched out to Avinatan as she was whisked away on a motorbike, was the moment the world saw them both—and the last time she saw him.

Although she has not received a sign of life, Israeli intelligence assures Ditza that Avinatan is alive. And alone. We’ve all seen the videos of the other hostages, starved down to shadows of themselves—concentration camp skeletons. We can only assume Avinatan’s condition is the same.

Imagine, for one moment, what it’s like to be in Ditza’s shoes. What would you say? What would you do if your child was a hostage in the dungeons of Gaza?

We understand the parents willing to burn the world down, to do anything to bring their son home NOW.

Ditza is not one of those parents. She articulates her anguish matter-of-factly, her outward composure unsettlingly incongruent with the horror she describes. As if that weren’t enough, Ditza speaks with blood-chilling clarity, framing the physical nightmare as a manifestation of our struggle—and failure—on the spiritual plane.

Ditza says things we don’t want to hear. The soul recoils, which, to me, seems to be a sign that she is probably correct.

She points out that, 20 years after Jews were forcibly expelled from Gaza in the Disengagement, her son was forcibly dragged into Gaza—to the terror tunnels beneath. Avinatan has never once appeared on the lists of hostages considered for release. He is alone. Starved. Suffering.

And yet, their family name is Or—“Light.”

Ditza explains that she believes souls choose their journey before birth. Avinatan, she says, agreed to this nightmare being part of the story of his life. He chose to play this role in the story of the Nation of Israel. And that, she says, means he has the strength to endure it.

But why? Why must he suffer so? Why must their family suffer so?

Avinatan’s father, Yaron, rarely speaks publicly about his son. He’s worried sick—literally. His heart is struggling to withstand the agony. For this reason, his twin brother (and my friend), Rabbi Shimon Or—who has also suffered health-related stress issues—usually speaks in his stead. Ditza, no less distraught, focuses on the spiritual and less on the political.

How could any mother find meaning in this horror? It would be easier to stay in bed and remain in the dark, but Ditza says we must understand what is happening before we can make it stop.

She speaks because she wants her son back.

Ditza says, the Nation of Israel is meant to be a Light to the Nations. We have a job to do—an obligation to the world as well as to ourselves.

On October 7th, when Israel was attacked with the most revolting and obvious evil, the world looked to us. They expected us to show them what Light does to Darkness. They expected to see good vanquish evil.

But that isn’t what happened.

Instead, we entered a long, grinding war—feeding the enemy, releasing their fighters, allowing them to grow stronger. In doing so, we blurred the line between good and evil. The world, watching, grows confused. Even in Israel, some are confused. Perhaps what they thought was good is not. Perhaps what they thought was evil is acceptable—even reasonable. Justifiable. As a result, confusion is turning to anger: the Jewish people are failing in our mission.

Ditza says that even those who don’t see or believe in the spiritual realm feel it instinctively. They react—and lash out—without consciously being able to articulate why.

She sees two possible choices.

One is surrender. Make a deal, bring home as many hostages as possible, stop the war, save our soldiers. But she rejects this as an illusion—Hamas will never release them all, and such a deal only ensures another, even worse October 7.

The other choice is victory. To vanquish Hamas, reclaim Gaza, and declare sovereignty. To take responsibility for the land that is ours, because no one else can ensure our safety.

Israel, she says, has chosen neither. We have not fought to truly defeat Hamas. We have endangered our soldiers, left our hostages in hell, and failed to ensure that Israelis can safely return to their homes. We have not chosen sovereignty, still hoping someone else will bear responsibility for our future.

And it is this indecision, Ditza says, that is killing us.

Matter-of-factly, she concludes: “My son will remain a hostage in Gaza until we decide.”

 




Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon!

"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024)

PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

   
 

 

  • Thursday, August 21, 2025
  • Elder of Ziyon

Jerusalem Post, March 15, 2026

In an effort to combat loneliness among elderly citizens, the Israeli Ministry of Health announced the 'Golden Years Companion Program' today, providing rescued puppies to senior citizens, including Holocaust survivors. 'Studies consistently show that pet ownership reduces depression and increases longevity,' said Health Minister Dr. Sarah Cohen. 'These beautiful animals deserve homes, and our elders deserve companionship.'"


Twitter, March 15th, 3:47 PM:

@MiddleEastWatch: "Convenient timing for Israel to announce a feel-good puppy story while the Palestinian issue festers continues. Classic distraction tactics. #PuppyWashing"

Retweets: 1,247


Al-Jazeera, March 16th

Experts Warn: Israel's 'Puppy Program' May Have Darker Purpose

While presented as a humanitarian gesture, sources suggest these animals may be part of a broader security apparatus. "We've documented cases of dogs being weaponized by settlers,' claims activist Mahmoud Al-Rashid. "What starts as companionship training could easily become training vicious animals to attack Palestinians. It's happened before with wild boars."


New York Times, March 18:

A controversial new program, purportedly to give animal companionship to senior citizens in Israel, has been condemned by Palestinian officials as violent and Islamophobic.

"This is canine apartheid," declared presidential advisor Jibril Rajoub. "The animals are being raised and groomed at attack innocent Palestinian children, of this there is no doubt."

Eight year old Fatima Awda is fearful of dogs. "She cannot sleep at night since I told her about the vicious dog program," says her mother Aisha. 

Israeli officials dismissed the critics. "That's the dumbest thin gI ever heard," said Israel's health minister Dr. Sara Cohen, who announced the scheme earlier this week.

Yet Dr. Priscillas Thornfield, professor of Middle East Studies at University of Illinois, called the program "clearly Islamophobic."

"Dogs are considered unclean animals in Islam and as far as I can tell, Israel did not coordinate this announcement with Islamic religious leaders."

Some Israeli settlers are known to own dogs. 



TikTok, March 20th

A grainy video shows an elderly man with a small cut on his hand. Caption: "ISRAELI ATTACK DOG PROGRAM ALREADY CAUSING INJURIES."

Views: 2.3M 


X, March 21

@Israelidude: "That man is my neighbor. He cut himself opening up a can of dog food. He loves Fluffy."

Views: 67


Politico, March 23

A Dearborn, MI city council member may lose her primary election after her opponent, Ahmad al-Masri, accused her of being a Zionist because her campaign website did not condemn the Israeli Canine Apartheid plan. 

"Of course I am against canine apartheid!" emphasized incumbent Amy O'Neill (D).. "I just didn't get a chance to update my site yet!"

Al-Masri countered, "If Amy cannot keep up on important matters like this, how can we expect her to help run Dearborn?"


UN Press Release, March 25

The UN General Assembly voted 178-4 to to condemn Israel's systematic use of domesticated animals as tools of psychological warfare against Palestinian populations. The resolution calls for immediate suspension of all canine-related programs and called the plan a "threat to regional peace and security."


Amnesty International, March 27:

Our comprehensive 137-page report, "Wolves in Sheep's Clothing," describes how Israel has weaponized dogs against Palestinians. Our experts have found:

 * Over 80% of all dogs in Israel are owned by Jews, proving their concept of Jewish supremacy.

* The IDF has an entire unit dedicated to training military dogs.

* Cute puppies sometimes grow up to become vicious animals.

* While there is some evidence that a small number of seniors can benefit from animal companionship, Israel chose dogs because Islam considers them unclean.

Amnesty's director said that any program to promote dog ownership in Israel is a war crime, a violation of the UN Charter and a crime against humanity. 


Electronic Intifada, March 28:

We must boycott dogs. Whether we like it or not, dogs are now linked to Zionism and genocide. It is ironic that the same people who were terrorized by dogs in the SS under the Nazi regime are now promoting Jews to own dogs. What more proof do you need that Zionism is antisemitism? 


MSNOW, March 29:

President Donald Trump refused to condemn the controversial Israeli program to raise vicious dogs to attack Palestinians. "I don't understand what people are upset about," Trump said at a news conference. "It sounds like a good program for seniors. I never owned a dog myself but why shouldn't others be allowed to?"

Rep. Rashida Tlaib blasted the president, saying that this is just more evidence that he is an Islamophobic hater of Palestinians. "We shouldn't be surprised that he supports these tools of settler-colonialist oppression," she said. "But every decent person should oppose Donald Trump and his Zionist funders."



Epilogue: Six months later, a quiet news brief mentions that 47 elderly Israelis report significantly improved mental health outcomes from their new pets, one one of them was rescued when her dog barked to get help when she fell. 

This story receives 23 shares on social media.




Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon!

"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024)

PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

   
 

 

  • Thursday, August 21, 2025
  • Elder of Ziyon
The BBC says:
Israel has given final approval for a controversial settlement project that would effectively cut off the occupied West Bank from East Jerusalem and divide the territory in two.

Construction in the E1 area has been frozen for two decades amid fierce international opposition. Critics warn it would put an end to hopes for a viable, contiguous Palestinian state.

UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the E1 plans would, if implemented, "would divide a Palestinian state in two, mark a flagrant breach of international law and critically undermine the two-state solution".

 Let's go through the lies and hypocrisy:

A glance at a map shows that the West Bank is still quite contiguous. The "divided in two" rhetoric is absolute nonsense. Here is Peace Now's map of E1, Jerusalem and Maale Adumim from 2011:


Look at all that contiguity on the eastern half of the map! 

Others point out that this will isolate the Arabs of east Jerusalem from the West Bank. Yet those Arabs, whether citizens of Israel or recognized as residents of Jerusalem, have more mobility than any Jew - they can go anywhere in Israel and anywhere in the West Bank. E-1 doesn't affect them at all. 

Maale Adumim is never going to be evacuated in any possible peace plan. Israel has never conceded the area and every plan from Taba to Annapolis to even the unofficial Geneve Initiative had Israel holding on to Maale Adumim with at least a road between it and Jerusalem (in exchange for land swaps.)   E-1 makes the land connection to Jerusalem wider but it does not change the contiguity issue. The only potential problem is that Palestinians would have to drive extra time to go around the area.

Except that this isn't true either. 

In March the Knesset approved a road for Palestinians that would cut through the area and make it even easier for Palestinians to go from Bethlehem to Ramallah than they do today!

Again, map from Peace Now:


Peace Now calls this road built to make Palestinian lives easier an "apartheid road" - because Israelis wouldn't use it. Which means that it is "apartheid" because it, um, discriminates against Jews. 

Now, let's talk more about contiguity in a Palestinian state. Clearly, Gaza cannot be contiguous with the West Bank. So a Palestinian state will always be fragmented. The "peace camp" has proposals to minimize that problem - building an elevated road or tunnel between Gaza and the West Bank.

Meaning, the exact same solution they propose to link two non-contiguous Palestinian  areas is rejected when Israel proposes it in the West Bank to make it easier to link two already contiguous areas. 

Let's step back further. 

Who says contiguity is even necessary for a well-functioning state? There are bizarre borders in Europe like in Baarle-Nassau that has enclaves and counter-enclaves between Belgium and the Netherlands. In the US, Alaska and Hawaii are not contiguous with the other 48 states. And I once made this map to show the absurdity of the Palestinian demands that contiguity is necessary for viability.


The viability of a state is based on good governance and good relationships with its neighbors, and has little to do with contiguity.

Yet the same people who insist on contiguity have no problem insisting that Israel separate some of its citizens from others. Indeed, for 19 years, Mount Scopus was a completely separate Israeli enclave within Jordanian-annexed Jerusalem, where Jordanian troops did not adhere to the armistice agreement to allow free passage,  and no one outside Israel really cared. 

To be clear, I oppose a Palestinian state. I support E-1 as a necessary component to fully connect Maale Adumim to the rest of Jerusalem and not leave it open to the types of deadly attacks that isolated Mount Scopus and the Jewish Quarter were subjected to in 1948. (For some reason, contiguity is only considered important for Palestinians, not Israelis.) 

When you get past all the lies and hypocrisy and poor arguments, there is only one point that Israel's critics are really making: E-1 makes it almost impossible for any part of Jerusalem to be the capital of a Palestinian state. Given that dividing Jerusalem is essentially an impossible task, the fact that a divided Jerusalem would endanger the lives of a lot of people, and that Israel already annexed Jerusalem and will never consider redividing it, E-1 doesn't change anything on the ground except the fantasies of people who hate Israel. 

The Palestinian insistence on Jerusalem is not based on any historic connection or legal claim, but on the desire to separate Jews from their holiest sites. They didn't demand Jerusalem as their capital in their 1964 or 1968 PLO charters, and the first time I am aware of they issued an official document with that demand was in their 1988 "Declaration of Independence." It is not a long-standing demand - it is an attempt to cut the Jewish soul out of Israel. 

And that is what Peace Now, the UN and the European critics of the E-1 plan really want to see. E-1 doesn't affect the nebulous prospects of a Palestinian state in the least.   But it hurts the chances of separating Jews from their holiest places. 

Everything else is a smokescreen.







Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon!

"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024)

PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

   
 

 

  • Thursday, August 21, 2025
  • Elder of Ziyon
Sama News reports:
The UAE, in cooperation with the World Health Organization, carried out a new evacuation flight carrying 155 injured and sick patients, accompanied by their families, from the Gaza Strip. The flight departed via Ramon Airport in Israel and via the Kerem Shalom crossing. This brings the total number of patients and their companions evacuated and provided with medical care by the UAE since the beginning of the crisis to 2,785.
The Palestinian newspaper mentions coordination with WHO, but of course the UAE is also cooperating with Israel on these  medical evacuations.

The patients aren't magically transported from Gaza straight to the countries like Italy and France that are taking them in. Everything needs to be coordinated with Israel. 

How to jive Israel helping to save thousands of lives with "genocide" is anyone's guess.



Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon!

"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024)

PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

   
 

 

Wednesday, August 20, 2025

From Ian:

Brendan O'Neill: Yes, anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism
Let’s leave to one side Ms Sultana and take a look at the broader Israelophobic animus that has swept the West like a fever since Hamas’s fascistic pogrom of 7 October 2023. There is nothing more disingenuous than when leftist hotheads or liberal scribes say, ‘It isn’t anti-Semitic to criticise Israel’, because we are not talking about criticism of Israel. We are talking blind hatred for Israel. Hysteria about Israel. The fantasy of Israel’s death. The wild and demented conviction that Israel is the most murderous state in existence, if not the most murderous state ever, and that it wields staggering power over the obsequious nations of the West. That’s not criticism – it’s a species of madness, built on the foul belief that the Jewish State is the most nefarious, most bloody and most sneakily powerful state on Earth.

Show me one other anti-war movement that called not only for an end to war but for the end of an entire nation. ‘We don’t want two states / We want ’48!’, cry the keffiyeh-adorned bigots of America’s Ivy League to signal their desire to return to 1948 before the modern State of Israel existed. Shorter version: obliterate that filthy country. Which other nation is referred to as ‘the pigs of the Earth’, as ‘uniquely murderous’, as a ‘scum state’, as ‘the new Nazi state’? Name another country whose annihilation is feverishly envisioned by that unholiest alliance of radical Islamists calling for the army of Muhammad to return to slaughter every last Jew and Israel-sick leftists screaming ‘From the river to the sea’.

And name one nation – just one – that is not only lambasted for its actions but also finds its entire right to nationhood ceaselessly called into question. ‘Fuck Zionism’, protesters cry. Zionism is ‘a cancer to the planet’, they say. Destroy the ‘Zionist entity’, mobs wail, like that’s normal; like it’s normal to pine publicly for the erasure of a nation of nine million souls. Until someone shows me footage of hundreds of thousands of fuming Westerners hitting the streets to say ‘Fuck Turkish statehood’ or ‘Destroy the Pakistani entity’, I will entertain not one single protestation that anti-Zionism is just ‘criticism of Israel’. No, if you have sworn yourself solely to the upending and elimination of the project of Jewish nationhood, then you can’t be too surprised if someone calls you a Jew hater.

Criticism? Please. We’ve now reached a point where I struggle to envision what ‘criticism of Israel’ would even look like. We never see it. We only see a savage and violence-tinged loathing for Israel that long ago left the plane of geopolitical critique and now exists entirely in the realm of bigotry. Everything they once said about the Jews – they love to let blood, they love to kill children, they’re all-powerful, they’re a cancer on humanity – they now say about the Jewish nation. Some people might accept that this is entirely coincidental – I am not one of those people.
The Betrayal of Journalism in Gaza
While it might seem obvious that uniformed military personnel would not be considered journalists, CPJ seems all too willing to grant ununiformed terrorist operatives who perform equivalent military functions for their respective militant groups that very title, artificially inflating the number of journalists killed and undermining the contributions of actual media professionals who make the ultimate sacrifice in the line of duty.

Finally, there have been several individuals who operated as journalists for reputable news organizations while moonlighting as full-fledged combat operatives for terrorist groups. Unlike the previous group, these were no mere propagandists, but rather key members of rocket launching squads, snipers, and commanders of combat battalions.

Anas Al-Sharif, whose death last week triggered the current wave of international opprobrium, was such an individual. While both CNN and the BBC have confirmed that he previously served as a Hamas propaganda operative, he went on to join Al Jazeera, becoming a recognizable face to millions in the Arab world as he broadcast from Gaza throughout the current war.

In October 2024, the IDF released a ream of personnel files, salary records, and other documents captured in Gaza proving that six Al Jazeera employees were active Hamas and Islamic Jihad terror operatives. Al-Sharif was identified as the commander of a Hamas rocket launching squad and a member of the group’s Nukhba Force — the elite unit that spearheaded the October 7 attack — and was shown to be on Hamas’s payroll. Al Jazeera angrily rejected the charges, claiming that they were being used as a pretext to target its journalists, and continued employing Al-Sharif and the others.

After Al-Sharif and his colleagues were killed in an Israeli airstrike, CPJ CEO Jodie Ginsberg declared the killings to have been unlawful. “International law is very clear on this point that the only individuals who are legitimate targets during a war are active combatants,” she told the BBC. “Having worked as a media advisor for Hamas, or indeed for Hamas currently, does not make you an active combatant,” she added. Her comments were later echoed by Foreign Press Association President Ian Williams, who told CNN’s Bianna Golodryga that he “[doesn’t] care if Al-Sharif was in Hamas or not,” saying that “Hamas is a political organization” and “we don’t kill journalists for being Republicans or Democrats or, in Britain, Labour Party.”

But that comparison is plainly ridiculous and it is simply untrue that only “active combatants” can be targeted in wartime. Under international humanitarian law, an individual who performs a continuous combat function (CCF) is viewed as having lost his or her civilian status and is indeed considered a legitimate military target. In point of fact, that standard has been applied in numerous conflicts — from the Kosovo War to the Iraq War to the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine — to justify the targeting of propaganda officials and functionaries whose activities contributed directly to war efforts. Even a “media advisor” for Hamas — or a propaganda operative for one of its media outlets, like the individuals discussed above — could indeed be targeted if he or she had a CCF, meaning he or she was fully integrated into the terrorist group and was continuously engaged in hostilities.

Yet according to the evidence produced by Israel, Al-Sharif was no mere “media advisor” — he was an actual combatant on behalf of a recognized terrorist group, having commanded a rocket squad and served as a member of Hamas’s commando force. There is no question, then, that he was a legitimate military target.

Which begs the question: Why are media organizations and journalists’ associations defending terrorists?
Radical U: Professors as architects of the campus Palestinian resistance
In the span of a few years, American academics have escalated their support for the Palestinian “resistance” from rhetorical to material.

For decades, academics have fostered a friendly territory for radical groups and fertile ground for anti-Israel propagandists, though few actually endorsed terrorism. It’s safer to massage the language, twist a metaphor or two, and figure out a way to excuse violence without actually endorsing it—or at least use language, often abstruse or cryptic language, to provide a degree of deniability.

But all that has changed.

Oct. 7 triggered something in many academics, who suddenly no longer felt constrained. Rather than stopping just short of applauding terrorism against Israel, they adopted Hamas’s slogans and defended its attacks. Colleges and universities today have effectively taken the place of the Palestinian terrorist organizations as the primary disseminators of anti-Israel propaganda to Americans. Middle Eastern studies departments and programs in particular have transformed academia into the vanguard of anti-Zionism in a sick perversion of philosopher John Stuart Mill’s vision for higher education—turning students into “capable and cultivated human beings.”

Along the path to academia’s shocking embrace of Hamas, some moments stand out. The 2006 war with Hezbollah, coupled with military operations against Hamas in Gaza in 2008-09 and 2014, brought new adherents to the BDS movement. However, it was the 2021 Hamas war that inspired many academics to graduate from observers to self-described participants in the Palestinian cause.

Coming a year after the Black Lives Matter-George Floyd riots in the summer of 2020, with most college classes still being taught via Zoom, the brief conflict that lasted 11 days in May 2021 riled a pandemic-restless academia. And so, members spontaneously exploded with a flurry of nearly identical statements and petitions defending Hamas and blaming Israel for the war.

Of the more than 300 “solidarity statements,” one of them, titled Palestine & Praxis: Open Letter and Call to Action, by “Scholars for Palestinian Freedom,” became the manifesto of a new movement. It provided a language to mimic and a template to follow. The word praxis (Greek for “practice,” as opposed to theory) became the jargon term du jour identifying this new movement, and every anti-Israel academic with an axe to grind found a fashionable praxis angle.

Some took to “archiving praxis in Palestine,” while others explained the “praxis of Palestinian democracy.” The Palestinian Feminist Collective developed a “Feminist Praxis for Academic Freedom in the Context of Genocide in Gaza.”

In the fall 2022 publication of the Association for Jewish Studies, Atalia Omer, a professor of religion, conflict and peace studies at the University of Notre Dame, called for “a praxis of restorative justice” that would “interrogate historically the Zionization of Jewishness.”

In 2023, an organization called Radical in Progress, whose “goal is to equip aspiring activists with the vocabulary, knowledge and strategies they need to radically reimagine the future,” published a “Praxis study guide” to Rashid Khalidi’s 2020 book The Hundred Years’ War on Palestine.

In the spring 2024 encampment semester, Students for Justice in Palestine sponsored an anthropology conference at Princeton University titled “Palestine as Praxis, Still.”

Whatever else the term implied, it meant action. The scholars boldly declared in their calls to action that “the critical theory we generate in our literature and in our classrooms must be backed in deed.”
From Ian:

Israel’s High Court of injustice and the Red Cross
Israel’s High Court of Justice has once again revealed its misplaced priorities. And that’s putting it delicately.

In a hearing on Monday about National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir’s policy to bar Red Cross visits to Nukhba terrorists in Israeli prisons until the organization gains access to the hostages in Gaza, the judges made their outrage clear. But their fury was not aimed at Hamas or the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), which has utterly abandoned its humanitarian mission. Instead, it was directed at their own government and prison authorities.

The ex parte session was spurred by a petition on behalf of the terrorists. It was submitted by the usual left-wing “suspects”: the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, Physicians for Human Rights, HaMoked (the Center for the Defense of the Individual) and Gisha.

These NGOs pulled a typical fast one. They first acknowledged that “Hamas doesn’t provide information about those it holds in captivity, and refuses to allow Red Cross visits to the hostages … in Gaza [among whom] are those who were murdered in Hamas captivity.”

They then went on to get to the crux of their foul maneuver to equate victim and perpetrator, by stating that “Israel’s obligations toward those it holds do not change because of Hamas’s war crimes and crimes against humanity.”

As if Israel’s “holding” of mass murderers is comparable to Hamas’s “holding” of innocent captives.

Not surprisingly, Justice Yitzhak Amit, the self-anointed president of the Supreme Court, agrees with this twisted logic. But the reasoning that he proffered during the hearing went beyond woke politics to focus on his personal reputation and that of his hallowed perch in the international arena.

“Right now, what’s … being publicized abroad [is] that there is starvation, that dozens of prisoners are dying, that it’s basically the Israeli Guantánamo,” he bellowed, banging on his table. “And you’re putting us, the court, at the forefront, on the front line.”

His colleague, Justice Daphne Barak-Erez, fretted about families of terrorists not knowing what’s become of their loved ones. You know, being a sensitive woman and all.

She went as far as to bemoan that each incarcerated individual has been reduced to nothing more than an anonymous title of “prisoner X.”

Though like the petitioners, she conceded that the Oct. 7 terrorists indeed “committed heinous acts,” she expressed horror that their families have no clue where they are. “Even in the harshest times, there was never such a situation,” she asserted. “A writ of habeas corpus requires that information be provided, and there was always compliance. Suddenly, zero information is being conveyed.”

Boo-hoo for the parents who raised their kids to boast about killing Jews with their bare hands.
Trump admin revokes security clearance for 37 intelligence professionals
Tulsi Gabbard, U.S. director of national intelligence, announced the revocation of security clearances on Tuesday of 37 current and former intelligence officials, “who have abused the public trust by politicizing and manipulating intelligence, leaking classified intelligence without authorization and/or committing intentional egregious violations of tradecraft standards.”

“Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right,” Gabbard wrote. Members of the intelligence community who “put their own interests ahead of the interests of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold.”

The list includes several individuals with ties to Israel affairs, including Maher Bitar, a former White House coordinator for intelligence and defense policy at the U.S. National Security Council under the Biden administration.

Bitar was a leader of Students for Justice in Palestine and worked for UNRWA, the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, which Israel has said is deeply infiltrated by Hamas.

Bitar is currently chief counsel and national security adviser to Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), a staunch opponent of U.S. President Donald Trump.

Andrew Miller, former deputy assistant secretary of state for Israeli-Palestinian affairs for the U.S. State Department, also had his security clearance stripped. He previously served as a senior policy advisor to Linda Thomas-Greenfield, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations under the Biden administration, covering the Middle East and North Africa, counterterrorism, political-military affairs and intelligence. He was also director for Egypt and Israel military issues on the National Security Council during the Obama administration.

Since his departure from the State Department, Miller has become a vocal critic of U.S.-Israel policy. He’s currently a senior fellow in the National Security and International Policy department at the Center for American Progress.
Germany charges Russian national with plan to attack Israel embassy in Berlin
German prosecutors have charged a Russian national they suspect of planning an attack on the Israeli embassy in Berlin and of trying to join the Islamic State terrorist organization, they said on Wednesday.

Prosecutors believe the accused, identified only as Akhmad E. in line with German privacy rules, obtained instructions from the Internet on how to make explosives, but the plan failed as he could not get the components he needed.

“From the beginning of February, he planned to carry out an attack in Germany, for example on the Israeli embassy in Berlin,” said federal prosecutors in a statement.

He has been detained since his arrest at Berlin airport in February. Prosecutors suspect he was on the way to Pakistan for military training with ISIS and that he funded the trip by selling expensive smartphones that he obtained by signing up for mobile phone plans.

He is also accused of translating propaganda into Russian and Chechen for IS, said the statement.

Prosecutors charged him on August 7 with preparing and incitement to commit a serious act of violence endangering the state and, as a minor, of trying to join a terrorist group abroad.


Disclaimer: the views expressed here are solely those of the author, weekly Judean Rose columnist Varda Meyers Epstein.

When more than 80 self-described Modern Orthodox rabbis signed a public letter accusing Israel of failing to prevent starvation in Gaza, the result was not “moral clarity,” as the document’s title claimed. Instead, it provided a dangerous boost to Hamas propaganda at a time of unprecedented hostility toward the Jewish state.

The statement, “A Call for Moral Clarity, Responsibility, and a Jewish Orthodox Response in the Face of the Gaza Humanitarian Crisis,” insists that while Hamas is guilty of heinous crimes, Israel bears responsibility for preventing hunger in Gaza. Cloaked in the language of compassion, the letter distorts reality, undermines Israel, and arms its enemies with new talking points.

Jewish law holds leaders to the highest standards of truth in speech. Yet this letter repeats claims that collapse under scrutiny. Though it does not have to, since May, Israel has facilitated the entry of nearly 183,000 tons of humanitarian aid into Gaza. The United Nations, by contrast, reports just 67,000 tons—a discrepancy of more than 115,000 tons. The explanation is simple: Hamas steals, hoards, and diverts supplies, while the UN amplifies those manipulated figures. In fact, since the start of the war, Israel has facilitated the entry into Gaza of almost 2 million tons of aid.



Instead of consulting Israel’s Coordination of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT), which publishes daily data on aid deliveries, the signatories embraced Hamas-tainted statistics and then presented them as an Orthodox moral imperative. This feels more like moral confusion and cluelessness than moral clarity.



The harm goes far beyond numbers. Anti-Israel media outlets in Turkey and the Arab world immediately broadcast the rabbis’ statement as proof that even Orthodox leaders accuse Israel of starving Gaza. The familiar weapon of “even Jews say” has now been upgraded: even Orthodox rabbis say.



Such messaging hands Hamas and its allies exactly what they need—Jewish voices validating their narrative—while antisemitism continues to surge globally.

Those who hold the title of rabbi carry an obligation to weigh the impact of their words. Their statements reverberate far beyond their intended audience, particularly in times of war and rising antisemitism. To sign one’s name to a letter that repeats propaganda is not an act of conscience but a failure of responsibility.

Rabbis are expected to serve as witnesses for the Jewish people, not to echo the accusations of those who seek the destruction of the Jewish state. At a minimum, Jewish leaders must confirm the facts before attaching their authority to public pronouncements.



The rabbis who signed this letter may not intend to harm Israel. But intentions do not negate consequences. By repeating distorted figures and equating Israel with Hamas, they have lent credibility to falsehoods that endanger Jews everywhere.

This is not moral clarity, nor is it an Orthodox response. It is, at best, naïve—and at worst, a dangerous gift to Israel’s enemies.



Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon!

"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024)

PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

   
 

 

  • Wednesday, August 20, 2025
  • Elder of Ziyon
From Times of Israel:
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu upbraided French President Emmanuel Macron on Tuesday, charging that the latter’s move to recognize a Palestinian state fuels antisemitism, drawing a combative response from Paris.

The premier went on to call on Macron to confront antisemitism in France, saying he must “replace weakness with action, appeasement with resolve, and to do so by a clear date: the Jewish New Year, September 23,” known as Rosh Hashanah.

The Elysee Palace slammed the accusation as “abject” and “erroneous.”

France “protects and will always protect its Jewish citizens,” the Elysee said, adding that Netanyahu’s letter “will not go unanswered.”

Haredi families from Britain who came to vacation in the village of Chatel, which is located in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region of France and is located in the Shabla region, on the French-Swiss border, discovered that an unknown person had sprayed anti-Semitic graffiti on at least 4 of their vehicles, reading "Free Palestine."
Or as the mayor said:
"It  is not uncommon to see people of the Jewish faith spending their holidays here. They are very recognizable by their clothing, and the perpetrators of these acts could not have made a mistake. I hope that the ongoing investigation will reassure them, as they are used to spending their holidays in our resorts in complete peace  ."

Jews - not Israelis, not Zionists, but identifiably religious Jews - were targeted with "Free Palestine" graffiti. 

I have yet to find a single "pro-Palestinian" activist quoted in news articles distancing themselves from the vandalism. 

Because everyone knows the truth: "Anti-Zionism" is nothing but a rebranding of antisemitism. 

And anyone who thinks that rewarding the people that cheered October 7 will bring peace, and not embolden Jew-hatred, is a complete idiot.




Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon!

"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024)

PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

   
 

 

  • Wednesday, August 20, 2025
  • Elder of Ziyon

Remember this headline from the New York Times last month?


It was an op-ed by Omer Bartov - the second since the Gaza war started - declaring that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.

But here's what Bartov said at a lecture a few months earlier:

“Genocide is a legal term… I use that term in debates now because I know, I see the immense urge to deny… But for the people in Gaza, do you think it really matters if you call it genocide or war crimes? We need to use that terminology because we are talking to another public… For the people in Gaza… who cares what you call it.”

In other words: he adjusts his use of the word “genocide” based on the rhetorical impact he wants. forget legal precision or academic consistency. He wants impact ..

That’s a serious red flag - especially from someone who titled his article “I’m a Genocide Scholar. I Know It When I See It.”

Bartov has now published two New York Times op-eds arguing that Israel is committing or is on the verge of committing genocide. He uses the same selective quotes from Israeli officials - ripped from context - that we've seen before and ignores the extensive counter-evidence. The second article even got him a featured interview in the same newspaper about the “fallout.” In other words: it made a splash.

And that’s the point.

The New York Times op-ed page is the holy grail for pundits. Bartov didn’t land there twice because he made a nuanced legal argument. He got there because he’s an Israeli Jew willing to say Israel is guilty of the worst crime imaginable, only decades after the Holocaust. That breaks the narrative, flips expectations, and generates buzz.

Had he held the mainstream position shared by most genocide scholars, that Israel's actions don’t meet the legal threshold, he wouldn’t be published in the Times at all. In fact, the only op-ed the NYT published saying that the accusations of genocide were wrong came from their regular columnist Bret Stephens. No Holocaust scholar was approached or approved to write an opposing opinion. (A rare counterexample is this op-ed in the Washington Post by scholars Norman J.W. Goda and Jeffrey Herf.)

This is the media-intellectual feedback loop: and it’s not about truth.

Media outlets chase clicks. Pundits chase prestige. When those goals align, the system rewards hot takes, outrage, and moral drama, especially when it comes from someone “unexpected.” The more a claim subverts group identity or shocks the audience, the better it performs.

The result? Truth becomes a liability.

Nuance doesn’t go viral. Careful legal arguments don’t get op-ed space at the NYT. What rises instead are loud, emotionally loaded, and often distorted takes, especially when they break ideological or tribal norms.

This isn’t an isolated case. It’s a media-wide problem.

Decades ago, journalism was built on trust, reputation, and accuracy. Now it runs on per-article performance metrics. That means buzz, not balance. Reporters and editors are rewarded for virality, not verification. And scholars willing to bend or amplify their message to fit the emotional needs of the moment find themselves with platforms - no matter the cost to their credibility.

Bartov himself once recognized this dynamic. In a 2000 review of Norman Finkelstein’s The Holocaust Industry, he wrote:

“Finkelstein views himself as innocent of any desire to exploit 'The Holocaust' for his own ends… The fact that his sensational 'revelations' and outrageous accusations draw a great deal of public and media attention is no fault of his own... From his Mount Sinai, everything is clear and obvious. It's just that his voice is too faint to be heard in the valley.”

Bartov isn’t as dishonest as Finkelstein - but the echo is unmistakable. He once critiqued the exact performative dynamic he now appears to be enacting. That’s not just ironic. It’s a warning sign of how the pursuit of visibility can erode the very integrity that once anchored public scholarship.




Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon!

"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024)

PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

   
 

 

  • Wednesday, August 20, 2025
  • Elder of Ziyon
The IDF's COGAT unit wrote in its newsletter:
Since May, according to UN data, only 3,553 trucks entered the Gaza Strip. In reality, Israel facilitated the entry of nearly 9,200 trucks. This represents a gap of almost 6,000 trucks - 2.5 times the volume of aid that the UN claims actually entered. The fact that the UN presents only part of the aid actually transferred misleads the international community and creates a false picture of the situation, directly influencing global media coverage and shaping the positions of international decision-makers regarding the humanitarian situation in Gaza.

The UN publishes its figures through a public dashboard that purports to present a full picture of all humanitarian aid, but in practice it includes only the trucks facilitated by UN agencies and a small number of aid organizations working with them. The dashboard fails to include aid delivered by other actors in the humanitarian system, including various states, additional international organizations, the private sector, airdrops, and the distribution centers of the American company.

The truth is even worse than COGAT says.

Since August 1, according to the UN, 14,778 tons of food entered Gaza. (Total aid was 21,500 tons, but nearly all of the rest were vehicles.)

In that same timeframe, COGAT counts 61,100 tons of food aid.

That means that the UN is only counting 24% of the actual food aid entering Gaza for this month.




For July, the UN counted 19,704 tons. COGAT counted 53,671 tons - 2.4 times the UN figures.

Keep in mind that this is aid entering Gaza, not aid delivered. So far in August the UN only counts 1,609 tons that was not intercepted on its way to the people - only 11% of the aid that entered Gaza counted by the UN.  COGAT does not count the food that makes it to the people, but we can assume the vast majority of the difference in aid entering Gaza is through the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, from which very little food if any is intercepted (some might be stolen by Hamas as people leave the distribution sites.) 

We can conservatively estimate that 40,000 tons of the GHF food made it to the people in August so far, which means that Israel via GHF is providing 25 times the amount of food to hungry Gazans that the UN and its partners are directly providing. (Of course, most of the food stolen en route does end up in the mouths of Gazans - after they pay Hamas for the privilege of eating food meant as free aid.) 

The problem is not, and never has been the amount of aid into Gaza. The problem has always been distribution and security of the transport. The UN blames Israel for that - but when Israel comes up with a better system, however flawed it might or might not be (I do not believe for a minute the Hamas figures of over a thousand killed by the IDF at GHF sites), the UN is more interested in dismantling the system that works in favor of the system that it uses where the vast majority of the food goes to Hamas and other armed gangs.

The websites are public. Anyone can check my figures.  Including the media. 

But the media is more interested in promoting Hamas lies, UN misinformation and anti-Israel propaganda than the truth. And this propaganda directly feeds antisemitism which endangers Jews worldwide - but who cares about them?



Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon!

"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024)

PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

   
 

 

  • Wednesday, August 20, 2025
  • Elder of Ziyon

The BESA Center report from July gives an excellent summary that describes why the IDF is not only legally allowed but tactically and morally obligated to destroy so many buildings in Gaza cities:
The fighting amounts to a deadly game of hide-and-seek. In order to clear the areas and reduce the ability of the terrorists to hide, IDF tactics now include much more vigorous destruction of buildings than previously.
The terrorists, Hamas and others, are using the buildings as fighting posts. They shoot from a building, move to another, shoot from that one, then move again, while placing remote-controlled bombs and booby-traps inside any building they believe the IDF will enter. ...Many buildings contain weapons caches, allowing individuals to move between them unarmed, enter a building, pick up weapons, use them, then return them before moving on to another location. Many buildings also feature tunnel shafts built into their lowest floors, which allow the terrorists to move between them without exposing themselves on street level and to replenish stocks of weapons, ammunition and explosives in these caches. Even when a building has been entered and cleared by the IDF, terrorists often return after the Israelis have exited to plant bombs or hide inside and shoot out at them. A significant proportion of IDF casualties occur during building clearing operations.

Buildings damaged by the fighting are also hazardous. In at least two instances, damaged but seemingly stable buildings have collapsed on IDF units resting inside them, leading to the death and injury of soldiers. The collapses occurred long after the buildings had been damaged due to the gradual failure of the foundations.

Destruction of tunnels often also damages the buildings above or adjacent to them, especially the foundations, making them unstable even if they seem undamaged above ground. Given the extent of the tunnels in Gaza, huge hazardous zones have been created above them. The underground system consists of 500-700 kilometers of tunnels that crisscross the ground underneath residential areas. For comparison, the London Underground is about 400 kilometers of tunnels and the underground portions of the New York City subway are about 700 kilometers. The urban areas of Gaza, under which Hamas deliberately concentrated its tunnel system, cover less than half the Strip’s territory and are approximately a tenth the size of urban London and an eighth the size of New York City.

Because so many of the buildings are unstable, the safest tactical choice for the IDF is to completely demolish most of them as it advances through the urban areas. It is also safer for returning civilians that these structures be entirely demolished, as damaged buildings pose a serious risk of collapse (particularly when the winter rains begin). Because this takes a lot of time and effort and is not always feasible under fire, offensive operations are very slow.

As to legality, all IDF activity is vetted by the IDF’s legal advisors. There is nothing inherently unlawful here. It is legal to target any civilian site used for combat operations; there is no obligation to check every room of a building for signs of military use, especially once civilians have been evacuated. 
As with everything else in this war, things that the IDF is blamed for as being immoral are a necessary moral, lifesaving response to Hamas' actions that endanger lives and use Gaza civilians as their main line of defense.

(h/t Irene)



Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon!

"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024)

PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

   
 

 

AddToAny

Printfriendly

EoZTV Podcast

Podcast URL

Subscribe in podnovaSubscribe with FeedlyAdd to netvibes
addtomyyahoo4Subscribe with SubToMe

search eoz

comments

Speaking

translate

E-Book

For $18 donation








Sample Text

EoZ's Most Popular Posts in recent years

Search2

Hasbys!

Elder of Ziyon - حـكـيـم صـهـيـون



This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For 20 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.

Donate!

Donate to fight for Israel!

Monthly subscription:
Payment options


One time donation:

Follow EoZ on Twitter!

Interesting Blogs

Blog Archive