Wednesday, June 14, 2017


Jenni Heltay Menashe is a charismatic lady who likes to show people around the Temple Mount. I'm a little in awe of all the people involved with the revival of our rights to this holiest site of the Jewish people—see for instance, my interview with Yosef Rabin—and I knew I had to interview her. I wanted to know more about what she does, what she knows about Har HaBayit, the Temple Mount. Getting out this column was the excuse to get an in depth look at all the amazing things this 51 year-old powerhouse is doing. I know you'll enjoy reading this as much as I enjoyed the digging and prying into Jenni's life.

We live in exciting times!

Varda Epstein: Do you work for yourself?

Jenni Heltay Menashe: I work with a couple of orgs. One is called Kapot HaManul and the other is called Keren L'Moreshet Har HaBayit. They offer tours every day.

All of the organizations connected to the Temple Mount are now under a single umbrella, United Temple Mount Movements. There's really so much going on today, so many organizations. There's actually a kollel, a learning collective for Torah scholars on the Mount!  A bunch of Haredim (black hat orthodox) come every day and they learn about things like the avoda, the Temple service. There are great people involved, for instance, Yaakov Hayman, who took over where Yehudah Glick left off because Glick couldn't go up to Har Habayit after he became an MK. Elyahu Weber was the mashgiach, the supervisor, for the Eda HaHaredit (an important board of haredi rabbis), and a teacher. He was a giant who gave up his position to run the kollel. He's awesome. A talmid chacham (a learned man).

Varda Epstein: How long have you been doing this work?

Jenni Heltay Menashe: Two years. I have been a tour guide with the Western Wall Heritage Foundation for 17 years working in and around the Old City. I am there anyway so I began to get involved with Har HaBayit (the Temple Mount). I'm not a licensed tour guide, but I did take courses at the Tower of David Museum and at the Jerusalem City Hall.

Today, Jews from every sector visit the Temple Mount

Varda Epstein: How would you describe yourself religiously? I'd guess Chardal?

Jenni Heltay Menashe: Yeah. I'd probably call myself chardal (haredi leumi or strict National Religious). I definitely wouldn't call myself haredi. Our posek (halachic arbiter, rabbi) is Mordechai Eliyahu.


Varda Epstein: Where are you from originally—I'm hearing a Canadian accent? When/why did you make Aliyah?

Jenni Heltay Menashe: I was born in Edmonton and grew up in Winnipeg. When I came to Israel in the 1980's I was going to be a Conservative rabbi. I came with USY on a year program. Once I was here, I became religious, became shomer Shabbat (Sabbath observant), and I stayed.

Varda Epstein: When did you first go up to the Mount?

Jenni Heltay Menashe: I was 13. I  came with my parents for my bat mitzvah in 1979. We weren't religious. In those days, you could go up there anytime, no problem.

Varda Epstein: What was that like?

Jenni Heltay Menashe: We had a secular tour guide, he wasn't religious. We went into the mosque and walked all over the mountain. Today, non-Muslims can't go into any building on the Mount.

Varda Epstein: What buildings are there aside from the mosque?

Jenni Heltay Menashe: There's the museum. They display things like rocks they threw at Jews, bloody shirts, you know, anything that has to do with their "struggle."

Varda Epstein: So you went up when you were 13. When was the next time?

Jenni Heltay Menashe: The next time was after I did the course with Kapot HaManul. This is a wonderful organization founded and run by Avia Frankel, a young PhD candidate. The main mission of Kapot HaManul, is to ensure there's a tour guide available at the Mount to explain things properly during all the hours the Mount is open to non-Muslims, for instance Christians and Jews. We help explain things about the kedusha (holiness) of the place and so forth.
Jewish women go up to the Mount, as well.

Varda Epstein: Do you receive a salary for your work?

Jenni Heltay Menashe: We receive a small stipend. We're paid for our time. We have to be there at 7 AM. During summer hours, for instance, the Mount is open to non-Muslims from 7:30-11:00 AM and then from 1:30-2:30 PM, though during Ramadan, there are no afternoon hours for non-Muslims.

Only one group of Jews is allowed up at any one time and only with a police escort. There are the regular police and the Waqf (Jordanian Muslim Authority) security in attendance. We always have Waqf security people. Their job is to watch to make sure no one's lips move in prayer. They're paid by Jordan to make sure the Jews don't pray, God forbid.

Varda Epstein: How many police accompany a group?

Jenni Heltay Menashe: There's no rhyme or reason to it. There might be 25 people in a group accompanied by 10 policemen and 7 Waqf people. Once I went by myself and I had 3 regular police and 2 Waqf guys and I felt like a rock star!

It's a little silly to be honest, but it is what it is. So for instance, last week when they were throwing rocks, the regular police moved us away very quickly as soon as we realized what was happening and the yazam, the antiterrorist police, blocked off the mosque so the guys in the mosque throwing rocks, couldn't get out.

I can tell you as someone who's been going up for a long time, there's been a change. It was tense. The police were there to keep us in line for the Waqf, but since Rosh Hashana there's a new police commander, there's new staff at security where you go in, and they're much more relaxed. It's so much more pleasant.

I credit the commanders for this change in attitude. I think that part of that is because of Avia, because part of her job is to negotiate with the police. But the new people are great. That would be Danny Mizrachi who is police commander for all of Har HaBayit, and Yuval Kaminetz on security at the entrance. A lot of the regular police are Druse—the people on tour get nervous: why are they speaking all of this Arabic? But they're Druse. They're great!



Varda Epstein: So what do you do during the tours, exactly?

Jenni Heltay Menashe: We explain to people why we go where we go and why we don't go where we don't go. This is what we're trained for. It's important. Some of the rabbis are afraid to go up because they're afraid they'll go to the wrong areas.

Varda Epstein: Speaking of rabbis, do you know Rav Yisrael Ariel? I worked on a museum exhibition for him, on the bigdei kahuna (priestly garments). Some of my handspun linen thread is in those garments.

Jenni Heltay Menashe: Sure! He's so interesting to tour with. Rav Ariel was one of  tzanchanim, the parachutists who liberated the Mount.

Rav Ariel is one of the few people who understands the relative importance of the Mount as compared to the Kotel (Western Wall). The Kotel is a consolation prize.

Actually, this is a really bad analogy, but it's like a contest between Miss America or Miss Congeniality, and we're picking Miss Congeniality. I'm not saying Miss Congeniality isn't important; there's always a Miss Congeniality. But we went to the Kotel because we couldn't go to the Temple Mount. Now that we can, there's no reason we shouldn't.

Of course, there's the issue of tvila, the need for ritual immersion before ascent. Some rabbis were looking into this. There's a place near Shaar HaShvatim (Gate of the Tribes), along the northern wall, an entrance you can go into without tvila. But Nashim L'Maan HaMikdash (Women for the Sanctuary) were against that. It's a good thing to do tvila before ascending to the Mount.

Nashim L'Ma'an HaMikdash is basically Rina Ariel and her sisters. You know who Rina is, the mother of Hallel Yaffa Ariel, HY"D (may God avenge her blood)? They make an aliya (go up) to Har HaBayit twice a month. Usually on yod chet, which is chai, life, and somewhat the middle of the month; and also on Rosh Chodesh, the first day of each new month.  

The Mosque was built on the site of the Kadosh HaKadoshim, the Holy of the Holies. 

Varda Epstein: I know they were pushing to rename Mughrabi Gate "Shaar Hallel," Hallel's Gate.  

Jenni Heltay Menashe: Oh, we all call it Shaar Hallel. Those women are amazing. They have a Beit Midrash Mikdash (a Sanctuary study hall) in three locations, Kochav Yaakov, where I live, Kiryat Arba, where the Ariels live, and I think in Mevasseret. We learn all about Har HaBayit and the avoda, and sometimes we do physical things connected to the Mount like weaving or making challah in the style of the lechem panim, the  display breads or shewbread.

And there are other groups. There's a group that does practice runs for the Korban Pesach (Passover Sacrifice) and they do the Omer (harvest offering) on the first intermediate day of Passover.  You can't do it on Har HaBayit, so they did it in the Rova (Jewish Quarter of the Old City). People can come and see them do a practice run for all kinds of things. On Shavuot, they did the shewbread with the 2 loaves of bread.

We're so close we're practicing the ancient rituals. So when we finally can, we'll know how to do it. And I find it's one of the things that's bringing achdus, unity, because all of the different eidot (factions) are coming together to do the avoda of the Beit HaMikdash.

Varda Epstein: Why do you think Moshe Dayan gave the Temple Mount back to the Waqf in 1967?

Jenni Heltay Menashe: Dayan. Bless him. I'm really convinced he believed that giving the Waqf control of the Temple Mount was going to bring peace. He thought it was the war to end all wars and that now there would be peace. Hey, they all thought that! The fact that there's no peace is shocking to them.

He really thought it would bring peace. I think he was misguided but he wasn't being nasty or anti-religious. I am convinced he wanted peace.

I don't want to think so badly of anyone and there is this element of him being a hero. History will tell whether he was the smartest or dumbest man in history. We had the Mount and now we only have it in a very limited way. Look at Mearat HaMachpela, the Tomb of the Patriarchs, in Hebron. Jews and Muslims split it half-half. Why can't it be like that with the Mount?

We thought it was such a miracle, what happened in '67. They thought there would never be another war. It's difficult for us to understand that, but if you speak to the men who were soldiers then, that's what they all say.

The Waqf threw a tarp over these ancient wooden beams which have been carbon dated and go back to Temple times.

Ancient beams made from the wood of cypress and cedars of Lebanon trees, discarded as refuse in the Shaar Rachamim compound on the Temple Mount.


Varda Epstein: What should we be doing to take back the Temple Mount?

Jenni Heltay Menashe: 991 Jews went up on Yom Yerushalayim, Jerusalem Day—it was a record. They should have called in the Guinness people. But it should be like that all the time. Why should we have to wait to go up? The police are going to have to change their rules, so we don't have to wait.

Maybe we need to lobby the Knesset. They close Har HaBayit to Jews on all these Muslim holidays, why couldn't they open it up on Jewish festivals for Jews only?? We need to force the government to make changes for the better.

The Church of the Holy Sepulchre is open all the time. Why are there limited hours for Jews to visit the Mount? It should be open all the time.

How many Jews make trouble on the Mount? Go up there specifically to pray? And anyway the law says we can pray there. So why can't we do it?

They call it a provocation. We need clearer laws.

Ya know: in what other country would a people give up their holiest place and say, "We won't pray in our holiest place, we'll take the consolation prize?"

We need to shift our mentality back. Shift it back to what a Jewish mentality should be.

Varda Epstein: What do women need to know about going up to the Temple Mount?

Jenni Heltay Menashe: Women have to separate from their husbands either 3 days or two days, so there's a shalom bayit problem, a problem for married couples. There's a 1-day leniency for some. Then a woman has to dip in the mikveh, the ritual bath. There's an issue with single girls going to the mikveh. Some mikveh attendants won't allow this.

Anyway, because of the separation between husbands and wives, a lot of the rabbis are against it (women going up on the Mount). And that's the major difference between men and women. Men don't have to separate from their wives. They just tovel (dip in the ritual bath) in the morning, no problem.  

It's a problem for a woman to take a break (from marital relations) for three days. There are already so many days a woman can't be with her husband (because of menstruation). You have to have a husband who is pro (women going on Har Habayit). If he's anti, she definitely shouldn't go. The biggest issue, of course, is you must plan it all out.

But a lot of what is happening today in this sphere, with Har Habayit, is due to women, the push of the women, like in Egypt and in the desert, how the women helped perpetuate our nation. Do you know there's even Beit HaMikdash jewelry, beautiful jewelry with symbols that evoke Har HaBayit. Sarah Feld of Beit El makes amazing jewelry. Maayan Ayash designed Rina Ariel's necklace with a gate that says "Zeh HaShaar, Shaar Hallel" (This is the Gate, Hallel's Gate).

The entrance to the Holy of Holies with the Hebrew words "Oro Shel Olam" or Light of the World. Original Jewelry by Sarah Feld.

Pomegranate with pearl reminds us of the Priestly garments. Original jewelry by Sarah Feld  
There are new things at the Kotel, too. There's something called A Look Into the Past, which is a virtual tour of the Beit HaMikdash, you sit on  a chair, put on these goggles, turn 360 degrees, and you tour the Beit HaMikdash, it's like you're really there. Everyone raves about it. I've taken people there and they just cry.

The other tour there is the Journey to Jerusalem, a computer-activated program where the Bayit Sheni (the Second Temple) has just been destroyed. The Jews have to run away: where do you go? You have options.

It's been good for the Jews for a couple hundred years, then, all the sudden, it's not so good, so where do you go?  You could do the program 200 times and never get the same journey. I've done it 50 times and never get the same thing. These days there's so much more than the Kotel




We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
Our weekly column from the humor site PreOccupied Territory

Check out their Facebook page.


GemaraNew York, June 14 - Experts in the body of Jewish law and lore called the Talmud voiced amazement and gratitude this week to antisemitic groups spreading passages from the work that the scholars, despite their collective expertise, had never encountered.
Professors of Talmud around the world expressed amazement at the passages the hate groups cite with some frequency to the effect that non-Jews are subhuman, that it is permissible to kill or steal from a gentile, that the Jewish goal is world domination, and many other dicta from the collection of teachings, compiled in the fifth and sixth centuries CE. To a man, observed the scholars, not a single one of them had previously been acquainted with those passages despite poring over and analyzing the Talmud for decades.

"I don't know how they managed to find those parts - I still don't know where they are supposed to fit in, but that is for later analysis, I suppose," gushed Hugh Gottabee-Kidden, a Professor of Talmud at Ryerson University. "It just goes to show that even the experts might not be able to find things that a layman can."
"I'm curious, and eager to examine those passages in the original Aramaic," admitted Dina de Garmi of the University of Bologna, Italy. "To date I have only seen the selections in translation posted by various white power groups and Islamist sympathizers. I do hope they soon release the original manuscripts containing these passages, so linguistic and other analyses may be performed on them. What a find!"

Representative of antisemitic organization demurred. "We never said anything about manuscripts," hesitated a spokesman for the Nation of Islam. "Maybe you ought to ask the David Duke or Stormfront people - I'm sure they know all about the original source."

A call to Stormfront yielded no further information. "Oh, everyone's known that stuff for centuries - we didn't discover it ourselves," insisted a man who identified himself as Mr. Black. "Those so-called scholars are just messing with everybody. It's part of a conspiracy to hide the truth. Now that we've been instrumental in not letting anyone hide the truth anymore, they're changing tacks - instead of dismissing us as crackpots, all of a sudden we're useful to them. Well, we're nobody's fool. They're the ones with the original Aramaic, not us. Go ask any yeshiva boy."

Rabbis and yeshiva students admitted confusion. "I'm not sure I follow," responded Rabbi Yirmiya Seinfeld of the Lakewood Yeshiva. "I'm supposed to find passages teaching me how to control the world and subjugate the goyim? Man, I was hoping just to make ends meet this month. You sure you're not from the International Jewish Conspiracy, with a generous payment to prove to me you folks actually exist? Please?"



We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
From Ian:

PMW: Did the PA lie to the US Secretary of State?
The US Secretary of State was told that the PA intends to "cease the payments to the family members of those who have committed murder or violence against others"
The PA currently pays 26,800 families of "Martyrs" 660 million shekels ($183 million) per year [2016 PA budget]
The PA currently pays 6,500 terrorist prisoners salaries amounting to 486 million shekels ($135 million) per year
Contrary to what the US was told, Abbas and PA officials tell Palestinians that the salaries will never be stopped:
PLO Prisoners' Affairs' Commission director:
"In response to American Secretary of State [Rex Tillerson's] statements about stopping the allowances... Karake emphasized that the Palestinian leadership will not submit to any pressure, and that the aid to the families of the prisoners and Martyrs is a national, moral, and human responsibility. He also rejected all the terms and concepts that define the prisoners and Martyrs as 'terrorists'"
PLO Prisoners' Affairs' Commission director [April 29, 2017]:
"The President [Abbas] emphasized his absolute refusal of the Israeli demands to stop the allowances of the families of the prisoners and Martyrs (Shahids), and emphasized his absolute support for them (i.e., for the payments)'"
PA Ministry of Information: "Martyrs" deserve payments because they are not "highway robbers, but people who sacrificed their lives and freedom"
PLO official Ahmed Majdalani: "... calmed the prisoners and Martyrs' families [saying] that the Palestinian leadership will not submit to the occupation's laws and will continue to be loyal to the Martyrs' blood and the prisoners' suffering."

PMW: PA TV’s “heroic prisoner,” representing “pride and honor,” is mastermind of murders of 14
Official PA TV recently visited the home of imprisoned terrorist Nasser Awais, who is serving 14 life sentences for planning attacks in which 14 were murdered. Palestinian Media Watch has documented that PA TV routinely honors terrorist murderers as "heroes," visits their homes, and even participates in their birthday celebrations .
The PA TV host praised Awais, who was also one of the founders of the Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades terror organization, saying:
"Nasser Awais has left behind a name and a legacy that cannot disappear. Nasser Awais who everyone knows what he did for the homeland... All the glory is yours, my brother Nasser Awais." [Official PA TV, Giants of Endurance, May 30, 2017]
In fact, the "glorious" things that Awais "did for the homeland" was plan terror attacks in which 14 were murdered and dozens were wounded:
6 murdered in shooting at Bat Mitzvah celebration (Hadera, Jan. 16, 2002)
3 murdered in shooting and stabbing at Seafood Market (Tel Aviv, March 5, 2002)
2 murdered in shooting (Jerusalem, Jan. 22, 2002)
2 murdered, 1 a baby, in grenade attack (Netanya, March 9, 2002)
Israeli border policeman murdered (March 31, 2002)
In addition to glorifying terrorists verbally, all Palestinian terrorists imprisoned by Israel receive a high monthly salary from the PA. Awais has already received 558,200 shekels ($147,000) in salary, as mandated by PA law. Under PA law, salaries of terrorist prisoners keep rising the longer the terrorists are imprisoned. In other words, the worse the crime, the longer the time in prison, the higher salary. In January 2011, the PA also raised the salaries substantially.
PA TV's “heroic prisoner,” representing “pride and honor,” is mastermind of 14 murders


  • Wednesday, June 14, 2017
  • Elder of Ziyon
From Radio New Zealand:

Diplomatic relations between New Zealand and Israel have been restored after a letter from the New Zealand government expressing regret at "fallout" from a UN resolution that sparked a six-month political crisis.

Israel recalled its ambassador in December after New Zealand co-sponsored a UN Security Council resolution condemning Israel's continued settlements. Israel condemned the resolution as a "victory for terror".

The Jerusalem Post has reported Prime Minister Bill English wrote a letter saying that he regretted "the damage done to Israel-New Zealand relations as a result of New Zealand proposing Resolution 2334 at the Security Council".

Foreign Minister Gerry Brownlee confirmed diplomatic ties between the two countries had been restored.

"What the letter indicated was that New Zealand wanted to resume diplomatic relations with Israel and regretted that there'd been fallout from the co-sponsorship of the resolution," he told Morning Report.
Longtime bile-filled editorial cartoonist Malcolm Evans responded this way:




Evans has always shown intense hatred towards Israel in his cartoons:





But he has also crossed  the line into clear antisemitism:





Even if one claims that these are just anti-Zionist, his true hate of Jews is clear from this cartoon of his:


Yes, Evans says that all US Jews have no loyalty to their country and look at America as a nation of despicable "goyim" to be taken advantage of.

Not surprisingly, Evans was fired from his job at the New Zealand Herald in 2003 for his noxious views, and he responded with this conspiracy-theory fueled cartoon where he pretends to be a literal martyr.

(h/t John W)





We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
  • Wednesday, June 14, 2017
  • Elder of Ziyon


Linda Sarsour has been taking a new tack lately to defend Islamic laws: by saying that they are exactly the same as Jewish laws.


Sarsour is very wrong.

Unlike Christianity which is faith-based, normative Judaism and Islam are above all legal systems. What people are and aren't allowed to do is determined using a loose, mostly decentralized judicial system. Every aspect of both Jewish and Muslim lives, for believers, is determined by legal rulings. Both systems have personal laws that look bizarre and arcane to outsiders.

But halacha developed in the Jewish Diaspora. The bulk of Jewish laws concern the day to day lives of Jews with the implicit assumption that they are living under non-Jewish rule. While halacha can deal with matters of Jewish sovereignty, those discussions are for the most part theoretical. (Just as halacha can address theoretical questions about how to pray in the Space Shuttle or on the moon.)

Sharia, however, developed in countries that were majority Muslim. This marks the biggest practical difference between Islamic law and Jewish law; Islamic law is meant to apply not only to Muslims as individuals but to Muslims as a nation (umma.)

This is why so many Westerners get Islam wrong. Sure, it is a religion, but it is also a political philosophy (or, actually, a set of several related philosophies.)

As a political philosophy, Islam is objectively awful compared to modern political philosophies in terms of human rights and modern liberalism. But people are afraid to criticize it because they have been brainwashed to believe that it is purely a belief system and not a political worldview.

Sarsour pretends that sharia is only personal, like halacha almost always is, but then she is forced to ignore the Quranic-based laws and punishments that exist, today, in Saudi Arabia, Iran and Pakistan.

She is forced to ignore how Palestinians are arrested during Ramadan for publicly eating - and that goes for Christians, too.

Poster seen in the UK
And many Muslims do not limit their demands for sharia to only Muslim majority countries. As the graphic at the top of this article shows, sometimes they demand sharia for Western countries as well, or in areas where they are predominant:




And that brings up the next difference between sharia and halacha: Societies based on sharia law, loosely or strictly, force non-Muslims to adhere to that law as well. The constitutions of Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Oman, Iran and other countries specifically say that Sharia or Koranic law are major parts of their legal system.

Oh, and so does the constitution of "Palestine". Article 4, paragraph 2, says "The principles of Islamic Shari’a shall be the main source of legislation."

Israel does not base its legal system on halacha. And very few people want it to, at least before the Messiah's arrival. But Sharia is not merely a personal legal system; it is meant to be enforced on a national or pan-Muslim basis.

At least.

When Muslims like Sarsour insist that American law of course supercedes Islamic law in the US, they are adding an implicit "for now." Because Islam's legal based system includes the political constructs of Dar al Harb, where  (according to many but not all Muslims) the Western nations are places to be attacked or conquered.

There are fatwas that support killing Americans, suicide bombing Israelis, beating wives, and any number of major human rights violations. One can argue that these fatwas are not universally accepted, but they are based on Muslim religious sources and have a level of support. One cannot easily dismiss them without showing a Sharia-based argument that they are wrong - which is not always so easy, since Islamic law has not really evolved over time.

Which is perhaps the most important difference between sharia and halacha.

Halacha evolves - slowly, to be sure, but it does.It finds loopholes - solidly based in Jewish sources, of course, but they are loopholes - to allow things that would be forbidden in the strict halachic sense. The community interest can and does steer halacha away from things that would look bad or unfair or unpleasant. The concepts of "deracheha darchei noam" and "darchei shalom" and "kovod habriut"  and "sha’at ha-dehak" and other meta-concepts are sometimes invoked to modify strict interpretations of halacha - or to accept previously rejected minority opinions -  to make Jewish law more in line with general community sensibilities or to avoid a clearly undesirable outcome.There is a sanity check that great rabbinic decisors can, sparingly, impose on the halachic process.

In other words, halacha has a built-in mechanism to modify (i.e., modernize*)  itself when necessary. It is invoked reluctantly, just as adding an amendment to the Constitution is deliberately made difficult under American law, but the ability to evolve is part of the halachic process.

Sharia, as far as I know, does not have this self-modifying property that can be used to modernize Islamic law.

So, for example, slavery is allowed in strict halacha. In reality, nowadays it is prohibited. You will not find a rabbi nowadays that says that it is permitted to own slaves for various reasons that are halachically based. But sharia has no such loophole to prohibit slavery, and slavery is still practiced in some Muslim countries, according to sharia.

As far as I can tell, a Muslim cannot say that something that was allowed in the Quran is prohibited today. They can say that they choose not to own slaves, of course, but they cannot say that it is prohibited.

These are just a few of the differences between halacha and sharia. Anyone who tries to say they are the same thing is simply not telling the truth.

-----
* The College Rabbi suggests that "moderate" is more accurate than "modernize" and I tend to agree.






We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
  • Wednesday, June 14, 2017
  • Elder of Ziyon
Times of Israel (and other media) reported on Monday:

The Hamas terror group warned Monday that Israel’s decision to reduce Gaza’s already paltry power supply would have “disastrous and dangerous” results that could lead to an outbreak of violence.

The Israeli cabinet decided Sunday night it would cut the amount of power it supplies to the Gaza Strip at the behest of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, who is seeking to ramp up pressure on Hamas, his Fatah party’s bitter rival.

The decision would see a reduction of about 45 minutes to the amount of time every day during which Gaza receives electricity, Israeli media reported.

“The decision of the occupation to reduce the electricity to Gaza at the request of PA President Mahmoud Abbas is catastrophic and dangerous. It will accelerate the deterioration and explode the situation in the Strip,” said Hamas spokesperson Abdel Latif al-Qanua.

“Those who will bear the consequences of this decision are the Israeli enemy, who is besieging the Gaza Strip, and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas,” he added.
Haaretz had an analysis:

Like the proverbial frog slowly cooking in a pot with the water temperature rising so gradually it doesn’t sense the danger, so the Gaza Strip is coming to this summer’s boiling point. Without it being either side’s objective, without any interest to be served by escalation, it looks as if Israel and Hamas are getting closer to a confrontation, with the active and exceptional encouragement of the Palestinian Authority.

And this is happening at the start of the Gazan summer, with temperatures already starting to reach intolerable levels. Top Israeli political and security officials held several meetings over the past two weeks to discuss Gaza’s electricity crisis and the likelihood of a military escalation in the area. On Sunday, the inner cabinet also discussed these issues.

Senior Israeli officials, including Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman, have already announced the Israel cannot step into the PA’s shoes and pay off its debts. The Netanyahu government does not want to be seen as capitulating to Palestinian extortion.

Military officials told cabinet ministers that it’s important to maintain the accommodations that prevent a new military conflict in Gaza. They stressed that further disruption to the electricity supply in the territory could accelerate an escalation. The Israeli government must presumably weigh the fact that the sums at issue, tens of millions of shekels a month, are lower than the economic cost of a single day of combat in Gaza, without even considering the expected casualties.

There will be no "explosion," for a simple reason: Hamas has lost the Arab world. If there was a new war, not only wouldn't the Arabs care about the brave Hamas resistance fighters, they wouldn't care about the poor innocent Gazans either.  Hamas has lost all its leverage.

Including cash.

Hamas is probably being driven into the arms of Iran, which would encourage war. But Hamas has already seen its fortune swing from being respected (when the Muslim Brotherhood controlled Egypt) to being despised. The pendulum can swing quickly in the Middle East, but if Hamas alliance with Iran would shut the door on any possible comeback for the terror group.

The last thing Hamas needs is a war where its own people, who know very well that Israel has nothing to do with the power crisis, will blame the Gaza leadership for making their lives even more miserable.

I still don't think it is a good idea for Israel to go along with this scheme of reducing electricity to Gaza. Israel should unilaterally take the money for electricity out of the taxes it pays the PA and tell Abbas to find another means to screw his own people.

Netanyahu is trying to stay out of this:
“The issue of electricity in Gaza is a dispute between the Palestinian Authority and Hamas,” Netanyahu said. “Hamas is demanding that the PA pay for the electricity, and the Palestinian Authority is refusing to pay. It is an internal Palestinian dispute.”
“In any case, I want to make it clear that Israel has no interest in an escalation [with Hamas] and any other speculation is wrong. But we have an interest in security, and our policy is clear on the subject of security and it won’t change,” he said.
 But by agreeing to reduce the electricity, Israel is involved whether he likes it or not.

The more Israel stays out, the more that the momentum we've been seeing of Arabs tilting towards Israel will accelerate. The (probably bogus) UAE Red Crescent report blaming Hamas for Israel allegedly attacking their field hospital is is truly incredible. If Israel is seen as helping ordinary Gazans (not Hamas) more than the PA is, for the first time in forever, Israeli goodwill gestures might actually pay off.  The articles in Arab media pointing out that Abbas wants to collectively punish Gazans while the Israeli enemy is trying to help them would be huge. And they would be written, unlike in the past.

Gaza has been the symbol of false Israeli cruelty. The reality is that Gazans have been the victims, above all, of Palestinian infighting. Arabs know the truth and they are just getting to the point of discussing it publicly. Israel should take the high road and force the PA to pay for the electricity this time. The potential upside is huge, and the downside is very little.





We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

From Ian:

Shunned anti-Semitism film shown for 24 hours only at Bild website
A new much discussed documentary on European anti-Semitism has been leaked on the website of the Bild Zeitung, Germany’s biggest newspaper. The leak, whose source remains anonymous, is illegal.
Titled “Chosen and Excluded – Jew Hatred in Europe,” the film by German producers Joachim Schröder and Sophie Hafner covers the various forms of Jew hatred that prevail in contemporary Europe. Although it was approved by network editors, for the past five months it has been withheld from the public by the Franco-German public TV networks Arte, which owns its broadcasting rights.
One of the reasons given for the highly controversial decision to shun the movie, which was commissioned by the German public WDR network on behalf of its partner station Arte, was that it would include too much footage from Israel. The documentary also includes a segment on anti-Semitic Israel bashing, which, as the film strikingly shows, is often supported by tax-funded European NGOs.
The public TV channels’ refusal to broadcast the film has been harshly criticized by public figures, among them scholars, politicians and artists who acclaimed the documentary. Now Bild is leaking a web link to the film for 24 hours, beginning Monday night and ending Tuesday at midnight.
Antisemitismus in Europa (Dokumentation neu) ARTE (h/t Gastwirt)


David Collier: Boycotting Gal Gadot. Antisemitic, discriminatory. BDS in action
Gal Gadot is the new ‘Wonder Woman’. Gal Gadot is also a proud Israeli. Gal’s nationality, religion and political opinion are hers to hold. BDS once again shows that it is little more than a Jew hating lynch mob, that everyone with a conscience should refuse to engage with.
It isn’t surprising that Lebanon wanted to boycott the Wonder Woman movie. The Arab boycott against Israel existed decades before the Arab Palestinians were even recognised as a separate people. Arab nations have always had a problem with advertising successful Israelis and Gal Gadot is a very successful Israeli. When you want to spread the propaganda that your enemy is the devil incarnate, it doesn’t help when Israeli citizens are successful scientists, sports people, academics and movie stars. Boycott makes the intended distortion easier.
Jordan’s suggested boycott of the movie is less understandable. After all, is there any point in Israel signing peace treaties with these nations? Perhaps for some of the Arab nations, the boycott is an excuse. After all, having Gal Gadot as a champion on screens in a deeply misogynistic society presents its own internal difficulties. Boycott is perhaps a back-door method of rejecting female-positive messages within the movie.
I always argue that the BDS (boycott, divestment, sanctions) movement is hypocritical and deeply antisemitic. I compare it to a lynch mob, ruled by the evil intent of those at the front. It does not matter if you are a social justice warrior, fooled into believing BDS is some meaningful humanitarian escapade. All you are doing is empowering the mobsters. After all, as a movement gains momentum, it doesn’t constantly need your permission to act.
We have to be thankful that as a mob that is driven by uncontrollable hate, BDS activists often show us exactly how hypocritical, discriminatory and antisemitic they are. Which brings us to the boycott of Gal Gadot. This an image from the Palestine Project:

The Irrelevance of Antisemitism
Whereas other forms of racism tend to demean people because of their race, ethnicity or sexuality the Jews are hated because they are considered omnipotent therefore responsible for all the evils of the world.
But the antisemitism expressed by members of the British Labour Party didn’t stop the electorate voting for them in their millions. Even on election day a woman was filmed at a polling booth in a Jewish area calling on people to vote Labour “to get the Jews out.”
And in the end the Jews were powerless to help themselves. In the end the leader who brought all this antisemitic controversy with him to the fore was returned with more seats than his ethnically Jewish predecessor. I suppose it’s testament to the faith British Jewry has in the British people that they assumed the reporting of incidents of antisemitism would disgust their fellow citizens enough to put them off Corbyn. Instead we’ve seen many come to believe that the reports of antisemitism are a “plot” to “smear” the exalted leader Corbyn to hold him back.
All this reminds me of a statement made by a demonstrator attempting to prevent Hen Mazzig from speaking at UCL in Central London. While standing in a crowd of screaming demonstrators who were just appalled that a small group of Jews might want to hear a talk by an Israeli officer in the IDF she said “in the 21st century we don’t need no Jewish majority state”. Of course this whole sordid affair demonstrated perfectly why, even in the twenty first century, we do.
Many people lecture Jews about what they’re allowed to believe, what they’re allowed to be offended by, what they’re allowed to be concerned by, what does and does not constitute antisemitism against them and few are listening to what Jews are saying about it. Furthermore many people are shocked and appalled, not by the antisemitism, but by the attempts by Jews to defend against it. “Smear” they shout, “plot” they scream. motivated by their own twisted morality they go to great lengths to scream from the rooftops that there’s no antisemitism, that it just doesn’t exist, it’s a conspiracy don’t you know!

  • Tuesday, June 13, 2017
  • Elder of Ziyon
As the Arab world continues its about-face concerning Hamas, new stories are coming out:

ABU DHABI // Emirates Red Crescent staff came under attack from Israel in response to Hamas fire from a Gaza hospital where they were working, the charity’s secretary general said at the Crown Prince’s Majlis on Monday night.

Mohammed Al Falahi said his organisation felt sacrificed after Hamas, which controls the Gaza Strip, fired on Israelis from the field hospital bringing retaliation from the Israelis.

Mr Al Falahi said the charity had coordinated with the Red Cross to distribute aid in Gaza during the 2014 conflict "and we asked them to liaise with the Israeli forces so they don’t strike us".

"While we were in the field hospital that the UAE built, we were surprised by – and this is the first that we have announced this – someone from Hamas instigating Israeli forces by launching locally made rockets from the field hospital", he said.

Inevitably, the Israelis hit back. "This shows their [Hamas’s] wicked intentions and how they sacrificed us," Mr Al Falahi said. "They always claim that the enemy targets humanitarian envoys but the betrayal came from them."

He said as the team were leaving Gaza "after having raised the white flag, Hamas accused us of being spies, undercover foreign intelligence who were escaping".

"And apparently they had informed extremist militias in Sinai and Sheikh Zuweid [in Egypt] that there was a group making their way there, so prepare for jihad against them.

"So Muslims fighting Muslims, who were giving humanitarian aid to Muslims. As we stopped at a grocery to buy something to eat, they started shooting at us."

He said the same time they found that the militias had planted landmines in their path a few kilometres farther down the path.

"What hurts is that the betrayal came from our own people," Mr Al Falahi told the majlis.
Not to defend Hamas, but these claims are a bit fishy.

I could not find any mention of the IDF attacking any field hospital, which would have been big news. The  UAE facility was in Rafah.  I went through the lists of alleged attacks on medical facilities in Rafah and couldn't find any such report.

The story of Hamas tipping off Sinai militants to attack them and lay land mines strains credibility as well.

We know that Hamas fired from, and worked in, the vicinity of other hospitals and that they used ambulances to support terror attacks. Hamas is guilty o fsimilar war crimes many times over. But this story has not yet checked out.

Just because the Arabs are now turning against Hamas doesn't mean that their stories are any more accurate than their stories they make up against Israel.

In this case, the story isn't necessarily one of the UAE Red Crescent making credible allegations against Hamas.

The real story is that the wave of anger in the Gulf against Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood is now a tsunami that allows them to treat Hamas the way they used to treat...Israel.

(h/t John Godly)




We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.

3 years have passed. As I read the words I wrote then, it seems like yesterday. What I felt then comes rushing back and with it, the realization that still people around the world are unable to see these simple truths…

Parents usually have hopes and dreams for their children. Some dream that their children will be more successful than them, have more money, a bigger house… others will tell you “I just want my kids to be happy.”
In the Jewish tradition words and even individual letters are very important. God used words to create the world; Jews are the “People of the Book” (i.e. the bible). This belief is what led Bat Galim and Ophir Shaer to name their son “Gil-Ad”, rather than the more common “Gilad”.
“Gil-Ad” means eternal joy.
The Shaers chose a name that encapsulated their feelings about their son, their hopes for his life. They were very particular about writing his name with a hyphen to differentiate it from the standard bible name “Gilad” and from another word written with the same letters but pronounced differently: galed. “Galed” is a monument, built to honor and preserve the memory of the dead.
How ironic.
On June 12th, 2014 sixteen year old Gil-Ad Shaer was kidnapped and murdered by Hamas terrorists, along with Naftali Frenkel (16 yrs) and Eyal Ifrach (19 yrs).
Now the Shaer, Frenkel and Ifrach parents are left to build monuments for their children – tombstones. Galed instead of Gil-Ad.
A few moments after the three boys were abducted Gil-Ad called the police. This 16 year old child had the strength of mind and courage to call for help, to try to save himself and the boys with him. Who can imagine such audacity? Trapped in a car speeding off in the wrong direction, with armed terrorists, Gil-Ad dialed the police and told the operator “I’ve been kidnapped”. The recording of the call documents the crucial moments of the abduction: the call for help, the terrorists shouting at the boys to put their heads down, their hands down, one of the terrorists telling the other “take that (phone) from him”, bullet shots, shouts of pain and one of the terrorists singing. Yes – singing.
Purpose and intention make all the difference in the world. On one hand there are three boys that just wanted to go home. On the other, terrorists who left their homes, intending to kidnap Jews, terrorize and create suffering.
In an interview, the mother of one of the terrorists said that: “If it was her son that kidnapped the three teens she would be proud for the rest of her life.”
One mother wishes eternal joy for her son, Gil-Ad. The other says she finds eternal joy in the knowledge that her son killed the children of three other mothers.
What a difference.
****************************
It is politically correct to say that everyone is the same, all people have the same hopes and dreams for their children, have the same fundamental morals and values but this is just not true. Unfortunately. If that was true, Gil-Ad, Naftali, Eyal and so many others would be alive today. If that was true no Arab would have celebrated the kidnapping and murder of three children. Or be proud that it was their son who committed the murders.
It’s not politically correct to point out the difference. You could ignore them. Pretend they don’t exist. Many do. You could – but it’s very, very dangerous to do so.

Intention and purpose matter.



We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
From Ian:

Dore Gold: Untying the Gordian Knot of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
There are 58 Palestinian refugee camps in the Middle East. With the implementation of the Oslo Accords in the 1990s, 26 of these camps fell under Palestinian control. Yet there was no any indication that a single Palestinian camp was about to be closed. It was clear that the Palestinian Authority wanted these camps to be retained despite the advent of Palestinian self-government. Even the new Palestinian city in the West Bank, Rawabi, was built not for refugees, but rather for upper middle class Palestinians who could afford it.
The only explanation for this behavior was that the Palestinian leadership wanted to keep their grievance with Israel alive. In other words, they wanted to perpetuate the conflict.
The problem of UNRWA is well known among experts on the Arab-Israel conflict.
Nevertheless, the effect of letting this issue fester for generations deserves greater consideration. More than any other issue, leaving the refugee problem intact for the future undermines any possibility of reaching reconciliation between the parties. You cannot resolve a conflict and perpetuate it at the same time.
Until now, international diplomats have overlooked the Palestinian refugee issue, preferring to deal first with other dimensions of the conflict. But the Palestinians’ preparedness to finally resolve this issue is probably the best litmus test of their intentions – of whether they are ready to end the conflict once and for all. If a new peace initiative is to start, it should include at the outset a program to dismantle the refugee camps and promote a massive international effort for the construction of new housing. This initiative should begin in the West Bank but also should include Jordan, which hosts the largest Palestinian refugee population in the world.
Dismantling UNRWA is critical in this effort. It is the international caretaker of the problematic definition of refugee status for the Palestinians, which has allowed this problem to expand continually.
No international convention contains so expansive a definition of refugees. It is astounding that the international community keeps demanding concessions from Israel yet to date has not done anything about the deleterious effects of allowing UNRWA’s definition of Palestinian refugees to persist.
Alan M. Dershowitz: Why Won't Abbas Accept "Two States for Two Peoples"?
Some of the blame rests on the shoulders of Barack Obama. By applying pressure only to the Israeli side, not to the Palestinians, Obama consistently disincentivized Abbas from embracing the two-states for two-peoples paradigm. This came to a head in December when Obama allowed the U.S. not to veto the inane U.N. Resolution, under which the Western Wall and other historically Jewish sites are not recognized as part of Israel. (Recall that U.N. Resolution 181 mandated a "special international regime for the city of Jerusalem," and Jordan captured it illegally. Israel liberated Jerusalem in 1967, and allowed everybody to go to the Western Wall.)
It is a tragedy that the international community – headed by the U.N. – encourages the Palestinian Authority's rejectionism, rather than pushing it to make the painful compromises that will be needed from both sides in reaching a negotiated two-state outcome. Indeed, just a few days ago the U.N. once again demonstrated that it is a barrier to the peace-process. In his address at the U.N. General Assembly marking the 50th anniversary of the Six Day War and Israel's "occupation" of the West Bank, U.N. Secretary General, Antonio Guterres said:
"In 1947, on the basis of United Nations General Assembly resolution 181, the world recognized the two-state solution and called for the emergence of 'independent Arab and Jewish states.' On 14 May 1948, the State of Israel was born. Almost seven decades later, the world still awaits the birth of an independent Palestinian state."
Guterres failed to acknowledge that "the reason the world still awaits the birth of an independent Palestinian state" is because the Arabs rejected the U.N. partition plan, which would have given them their own state, committing instead to seven decades of undermining Israel's legitimacy.
When the Palestinian leadership and people want their own state more than they want there not to be a state for the Jewish people, the goal of the 1947 U.N. Resolution – two states for two peoples – will be achieved. A good beginning would be for Abbas finally to agree with the U.N. Resolution and say the following words: "I accept the 1947 U.N. Resolution that calls for two states for two peoples." It's not too much to ask from a leader seeking to establish a Palestinian Muslim state.
IDF Blog: 4 Reasons Why Hamas Is A Terror Organization
Hamas formed in late 1987 at the beginning of the First Intifada. The group’s charter calls for establishing an Islamic Palestinian state in place of Israel and rejects all agreements made between the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) and Israel.
Hamas’s military wing, the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades has conducted terror attacks against Israel since the 1990’s. These attacks have included suicide bombings against Israeli civilians, small-arms attacks, improvised roadside explosives, and rocket attacks.
Even as Hamas carries out terror attacks against Israeli civilians, they attempt to brand themselves as a “legitimate resistance movement”. That just isn’t true.
The definition of terror is “the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.” This is why Hamas’s actions fits that description:
1. Hamas has repeatedly called for the destruction of the State of Israel
It’s right there. Out in the open. They aren’t even trying to hide it. Their founding document explicitly says that their goal is to establish a Palestinian state in the ENTIRE State of Israel.
In Hamas’s new charter, which is said to be more “moderate”, Hamas says “Hamas rejects any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea.”
Hamas’s leaders haven’t been shy about their goal either. Mahmoud al-Zahar, one of the co-founders of Hamas recently said “If Hamas liberated 99.9% of the land of Palestine, it will not give up on the rest. We cannot religiously, morally or nationally give up on one inch of the land of Palestine.”
Hamas leaders, Imams, and Gazan citizens celebrate terror attacks against Israel. They teach violence in their schools. Parents praise violence in their homes. The result is clear: 75% of the Palestinians in Gaza support attacks against Israelis.
That isn’t what a neighbor looking for a life of peaceful coexistence sounds like.
2. Hamas specifically targets Israeli civilians
Hamas came to the scene during the First Intifada in the mid 1990’s. Targeting civilians has been Hamas’s MO ever since.
Between February and March 1996, Hamas carried out several suicide bus bombings, killing nearly 60 Israelis. From 2000 to 2004, Hamas was responsible for killing almost 400 Israelis and wounding more than 2,000 in 425 attacks. Read that again. 400 Israelis killed. 2,000 wounded. 425 attacks. And that’s all in just four years.
Since 2002, Hamas has spent massive amounts of time, effort, and money building and launching rockets at Israel. In 2016, Hamas spent 120 million dollars on building terror tunnels. In total, Hamas has launched over 11,000 rockets at Israeli population centers. A report written by Amnesty International found that Hamas rocket attacks showed “a flagrant disregard” for civilian lives.
This is the literal definition of terror. If you attempt to target civilians for political goals, you are engaging in terrorism. It’s that simple.

AddToAny

EoZ Book:"Protocols: Exposing Modern Antisemitism"

Printfriendly

EoZTV Podcast

Podcast URL

Subscribe in podnovaSubscribe with FeedlyAdd to netvibes
addtomyyahoo4Subscribe with SubToMe

search eoz

comments

Speaking

translate

E-Book

For $18 donation








Sample Text

EoZ's Most Popular Posts in recent years

Hasbys!

Elder of Ziyon - حـكـيـم صـهـيـون



This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For over 19 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.

Donate!

Donate to fight for Israel!

Monthly subscription:
Payment options


One time donation:

subscribe via email

Follow EoZ on Twitter!

Interesting Blogs

Blog Archive