Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Moderate Fatah's chemical weapons - attempt to poison hundreds of Jews

The thwarting of an alarming terror plot was cleared for publication on Thursday, almost three weeks after a joint Shin Bet and police operation led to the arrest of two Palestinian employees of the 'Grill Express' restaurant in Ramat Gan.

The men, Eihab Abu Rial and Anas Salum, both 21-year-old residents of the West Bank city of Nablus, had planned to lace dishes served at the establishment with a powerful toxin without odor or taste, in the hopes of killing as many patrons as possible.

The two did not have working permits and were residing in Israel illegally. While in Nablus, they had been recruited to the al-Aqsa Martyr's Bridges, the military wing of Fatah, under the guidance and funding of Hizbullah.

The men were arrested by police investigators following information obtained by the Shin Bet, several short days before they planned to carry out the attack.

In their questioning the men told interrogators they were to receive the poison from two operatives in the Balata refugee camp in Nablus – Husseini Salag and Hani Quabi – who are still wanted by security forces.

The white substance is virtually undetectable and affects its victims approximately four hours after being ingested.

If they would have been successful they could have killed hundreds of people who frequent the restaurant; it would take many hours for investigators to figure out the source of the illness while the restaurant would remain open and serving more customers.

Again, Palestinian Arab terrorists and their supporters prove themselves to be capable of pure evil. All the talk about not wanting to kill innocent people and how immoral Israel supposedly is is shown to be a sham when measured against a crime like this. It is effectively an attempted - and nearly successful - WMD attack, that will be largely ignored by the world.

And who will be ultimately hurt by such an attack? As with the Mercaz Harav massacre and yesterday's Nahal Oz murders, the inevitable result is that Palestinian Arabs will be hurt, as no one in Israel will hire them any more as restaurant workers. There is no doubt that thousands of Palestinian Arabs are extraordinarily upset that their livelihoods are bing threatened by their comrades, and there is equally no doubt that their voices will not be heard because of the de facto censorship in their media, where any voices against terror are muted and marginalized.

Notice also who planned the attack - the Al Aqsa Martyr's Brigades, out of Nablus, the terror group that the PA announced months ago was disbanded.

Widget, v2

I mentioned last week that I configured a widget to easily browse through much of the Zionist blogosphere.

Since I wanted it to be as large as possible, as well as easy to get to, I just created a webpage specifically to show the widget, for easier bookmarking (or remembering if you are at an unfamiliar computer.)

The page can be found here.

A quick trip through the looking glass

I used to harp a bit on The People's Voice, an absurd publication that Google indexes as a "news" source. It got boring and while Google might take down links to a post or two it would end up giving in to the loony lefties that support the site.

Today's entry is so over the top, both in terms of its content and its amateurish style, that I had to share a bit of it. Here's the link for cutting and pasting - I don't want to give them any hits directly from here:
http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/cgi-bin/blogs/voices.php/2008/04/10/the_rise_of_the_jewish_empire_the_jewish
(His use of language, capitalization and punctuation, not to mention content, indicates someone with an intellectual and emotional age of about 13.)

The Rise of the Jewish Empire: The Jewish Conquest of America
Bob Finch

There is no such thing as an american empire. America does not have an empire. On the contrary, america has become part of the jewish empire which dictates america’s domestic and foreign policies. The policies that america is pursuing in the middle east have nothing to do with america’s national interests – on the contrary, over the last four decades it has been forced to fight the wars on behalf of its jewish master.

America may have lost the war against vietnam but it has never been invaded or conquered by external forces since its declaration of independence. But since the second world war and, in particular the establishment of the terrorist state refered to as Israel, it has been conquered from within. Wasps no longer have any significant control over american politics or its foreign policies.

The israelis in america control the republican party and the democratic party and even the green party. They control the left wing of american politics (noam chomsky, stephen zunes) almost as much as they control the extreme right wing. They control congress. Jack abramoff apparently had in the region of 60 members of congress on his payroll. And these were not insignificant members of congress either since he funded tom delay who provided dick cheney’s power base. This israeli was not only funding american goys but terrorists in the jews-only state. And this is the political influence of just one jewish billionaire. When aipac and all the other jewish lobbying groups in america, whose prime loyalties are to the jews-only state in palestine, are taken into consideration, the jews are financing virtually all members of congress. These days when american politicians talk about the need to defend their country from external threats what they mean is any challenge to the jews-only state in palestine.

Israelis own and control the american media. They compose the largest group of billionaires in america who fund a vast network of political research organizations which determine the views of america’s jewish owned media and america’s jewish funded politicians.

The israelis have even transformed christianity in america. There are now tens of millions of so-called christian zionists who have come to believe in the zionist god of vengeance rather than the christian god of forgiveness. They no longer live on a god given planet but focus solely on the god given land of palestine.

There is not the slightest doubt that the american military is by far and away the most formidable military power in the world. But who controls that military is an entirely different matter. The american politicians who dictate military policy are not wasps but israelis - agents of the jews-only state in palestine. So, in effect the jews-only state controls american politicians who control the american military which wages war for the sake of jewish world domination.

There is no such thing as an american empire. America does not have an empire. On the contrary, america has become part of the jewish empire which dictates america’s domestic and foreign policies.

There may be those who argue that just because america implements the foreign policies of another state doesn’t mean to say that there isn’t an american empire which pursues american interests around the rest of the world. But this is not the case. America’s zionist foreign policy has drained american military resources so they cannot be used in other places around the world. The jews in american politics and their shabbat goy colleagues have become so focused on the middle east to protect the sacred judaic headquarters of the jewish empire that they have ignored, or been unable to combat, the rise of democratic forces in south america from where america imports a substantial amount of its oil.

Israeli traitors control the american media, the republican and democratic parties, congress, the pentagon, the office of homeland security, the cia, the defence intelligence agency, the state department, the national security council, and the presidency. The american military is implementing the foreign policies of the jews-only state in palestine. There is nothing american left about america.

And there are many people who read this inane tripe and say, "Yeah!"

Speaking of those sort of people, I stumbled the other day on a site that says, among other things, that the Entebbe rescue operation was a hoax. Sure enough, other sites sprinkled throughout the web mindlessly copied this "evidence."

Egypt finds huge explosives and weapons cache

Al-Ahram reports that Egyptian forces discovered a large cache of weapons and explosives in the Sinai, 60 kilometers from Gaza.

Found with the help of local Bedouin, it included 1250 kg (nearly 1.4 tons) of explosives, 24 anti-tank mines, and assault rifles.

I believe that this is the largest find of its kind - over the past couple of months Egypt has found caches of 100 kg, 250 kg (in a cemetery) and 500 kg as well as some smaller finds.

Meanwhile, the New York Times reports on how serious Hamas is on upping its military capabilities:

According to a report by the Shin Bet internal security services quoted in the study, Hamas has smuggled at least 80 tons of explosives into Gaza since last summer. That smuggling accounts for more than half the amount moved into Gaza since Israel’s withdrawal, evidence of the intensification, the study asserts.
The study also says Hamas has obtained advanced anti-tank devices like those used by Hezbollah against Israel in its war in 2006, as well as powerful roadside bombs for use in border areas where Israeli vehicles might be expected to pass in pursuit of rocket launchers. It added that hundreds of fighters had been trained in Iran, Lebanon and Syria. The study cites few sources other than several media reports, but Israel is known to be engaged in intelligence collection in Palestinian areas.
Some Israeli analysts say that is what Israel should do. The study, however, asserts that any kind of truce would allow Hamas to build its military structure further, although it also says Hamas’s big worry is that Israel will reinvade Gaza. Such a concern is one motivation for the buildup, the study says.

Of course, such an increase in explosives also means more Palestinian Arabs will end up dead, as this AP photo from yesterday shows:

A Palestinian militant sets up an improvised explosive device at a street corner in Gaza City, near the Nahal Oz crossing between the Gaza Strip and Israel Wednesday, April 9, 2008 in case Israeli troops enter the area.

What AP fails to notice is that the children right next to this IED, being placed in a crowded city, are far more likely to be killed by it than any Israeli soldiers.

Hamas' fake martyr operation

Palestine Press Agency reports that one of the "martyrs" that Hamas claimed to have been killed during Wednesday morning's murder of an IDF soldier was in fact killed in internal Fatah/Hamas clashes, and Hamas brought his body to the area to claim that Israel killed him: (autotranslated):

[Hamas'] Qassam Brigades announced in a press conference Wednesday in Khan Yunis in the martyrdom of Mohamed Fayed Chamie said that one of its leaders were killed during clashes with Israeli special forces and enable the sniper and killed an Israeli soldier east of Khan Younis...

Local sources in the Gaza Strip said that Mohamed Fayed Chamie not in the place in which it was killed, pointing out that while his body was transported to the hospital and his funeral emerged as a refreshing! There is a new death, which implies that he was killed in the internal events of the Gaza Strip and his body was thrown in the Israeli operation to his funeral and announcing that he martyrs killed during clashes with the occupation.

Chamie a resident of neighborhood Khan Younis many accuse him of being behind the murder and assault on Fatah and the security services and is one of the hired killers in the ranks of Hamas and the militias participated in the bloody coup in the Gaza Strip ", according to the sources said.

Citizens in the Gaza Strip, eyewitnesses told Palestine Press News "that Hamas has always followed this method during the events preceding or following an internal liquidation operations in the ranks of the militia hide them and no disturbances in the ranks of its members and the number of dead in concealing internal bloody events."

This is not the first time that Hamas has been accused of faking martyrs, either.

Since PalPress gives details on the person's name and circumstances, I am counting this as a 2008 self-death, putting the number at 57. And if this practice is as prevalent as it sounds, I am sorely undercounting - and the counts by various agencies of Palestinian Arab deaths from Israeli fire have been inflated as well.

Whitewashing what Muslims think

Martin Kramer looks at a book we've mentioned a couple of times, and now makes me almost regret ordering it:

Professor John L. Esposito runs a slick operation at Georgetown with $20 million of funding from Saudi billionaire Prince Alwaleed bin Talal. The shared agenda of these two is to make us all feel guilty for having wondered, after 9/11, about Saudis, Muslims, and the contemporary teaching of Islam. Esposito now has a new book (with co-author Dalia Mogahed, who runs something called the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies), bearing the pretentious title Who Speaks for Islam? What a Billion Muslims Really Think. It's based on gleanings from the Gallup World Poll.

The core argument of the book is that only 7 percent of Muslims are "politically radicalized," and that "about 9 in 10 Muslims are moderate." On what does this factoid rest? The authors explain (pp. 69-70):
According to the Gallup Poll, 7% of respondents think that the 9/11 attacks were "completely" justified and view the United States unfavorably.... the 7%, whom we'll call "the politically radicalized" because of their radical political orientation... are a potential source for recruitment or support for terrorist groups.
So an essential precondition for being "politically radicalized" is to believe that 9/11 was "completely" justified. The pool of support is only 7%. Don't you feel relieved?

Yet a year and a half ago, Esposito and Mogahed used a different definition of "radical," in interpreting respondents' answers to Gallup's 9/11 question. In November 2006, they gave this definition:
Respondents who said 9/11 was unjustified (1 or 2 on a 5-point scale, where 1 is totally unjustified and 5 is completely justified) are classified as moderates. Respondents who said 9/11 was justified (4 or 5 on the same scale) are classified as radicals.
Wait a minute.... In 2006, then, these same authors defined "radicals" not only as Muslims who thought 9/11 was "completely justified" (5 on their scale), but those who thought it was largely justified (4 on their scale).

So for their new book, they've drastically narrowed their own definition of "radical," to get to that 7% figure. And they've also spread the impression in the media that the other 93% are "moderates." In 2006, their "moderates" included only Muslims who thought 9/11 was "totally" or largely unjustified (who answered 1 or 2 on a 5-point scale, where 1 is "totally unjustified"). But what about Muslims who answered with 3 or 4? Well, they weren't "moderates" by 2006 standards. The 3's were neither "moderates" nor "radicals," and the 4's were "radicals." But this year, they've all been upgraded to "moderate" class, because they didn't "completely justify" 9/11. Whether they largely justified it, or half-justified it, they're all "moderates" now.

...
Because there's no hard data in their book, just these percentages, the authors are directly responsible for the confusion they've created.

Kramer makes the same point that I made in the initial press release for this book.

The entire reason I ordered the book was to get the raw numbers of the poll, and to see how many Muslims considered 9/11 somewhat justified - a much more important number! I suspected that the authors - both quite sympathetic to Muslims - were cooking the numbers, and I have already shown that they are dishonest in how they present the findings that they published before the book was released.

When the book shows up I'm sure I will have other things to write about.

Proof of Hamas' involvement in Nahal Oz attack

The gullible Western press happily reprints claims of responsibility for terror attacks, like this example from Reuters:

Fighters from three factions -- not including Hamas -- infiltrated the terminal.

The stories go on to say that Israel holds Hamas responsible, but the impression one gets from these stories is that there is no evidence behind that accusation, and that Israel is trying to gain political points.

However, there is clear proof that Hamas was directly involved in the attack. And even the Reuters article mentions it a couple of paragraphs later:

Hamas said it pounded the area with mortar bombs and machine guns during the operation, which one of the groups involved, the Popular Resistance Committees (PRC), dubbed "Breaking Zionist Arrogance."

Before and during the attack, Nahal Oz was bombarded with the worst mortar attacks in memory. And Hamas happily takes credit for the barrage in Arabic on its Al Qassam website (autotranslated):

Qassam Brigades resume bombing site "Nahal Oz" Zionist Qassam rocket (2008-04-09)

Qassam Brigades Tguens Zionist soldier near "Nahal Oz" The Zionist enemy recognizes affect it (2008-04-09)

Bomb-Qassam Brigades, a gathering of the mechanisms at the gate "Nahal deficiency" Qassam rocket (2008-04-09)

Bomb site Qassam Brigades "Nahal Oz" Zionist fired Qassam (2008-04-09)

A major part of the terror attack was the cover provided by this huge escalation in mortar fire. Which means that Hamas is just as involved in this terror attack as Islamic Jihad, Fatah and the PRC.

It also shows, yet again, that these "competing" groups work together quite well, so much so that some will take credit in order to take the political heat off of Hamas.

When Israel says that they hold Hamas responsible, they know how these groups work together, and they know who is calling the shots.

Iran's Mehrnews is concerned for the welfare of Jewish children

Iran's "news" agencies provide a never-ending source of amusement. Here's an op-ed that shows real concern for the welfare of young, impressionable Jewish children:

Apartheid walls go up, apartheid walls come down, but the walls in people’s heads are harder to dismantle.

Israel is currently constructing an apartheid wall in Palestine and the United States is currently constructing an apartheid wall on the U.S.-Mexico border. The effect of these walls on the people being kept out is clear, but there has been little reflection on the effect of these walls on the citizens of the countries building them.

...Indeed, what will happen to the souls of Israel and the United States?

The apartheid wall in Palestine is being built because most Israelis have apartheid walls in their minds.

This line of thinking is actually destroying the minds of Jewish children in Israel and the rest of the world.

The Zionists, who are so quick to condemn anyone who criticizes Israel as an anti-Semite, should try to determine who is the real anti-Semite. Since their racist ideology is destroying the minds of Jewish children, it is clear that the Zionists are the worst anti-Semites.

The Palestinians, all the rest of the Muslims, and all of the other anti-Zionist elements are not attacking the minds of Jewish children.

Nope. Only their bodies.

Racism produces a mindset that dehumanizes other races and ethnic groups and which is one of the worst things for the mental health of children.

It is said that the Berlin Wall was built so that its inevitable collapse would bring about the collapse of the Soviet bloc. Likewise, the apartheid wall on the U.S.-Mexico border and the apartheid wall in Palestine are being constructed so their collapse will bring about the collapse of the United States and Israel.

The New World Order will be built on the ashes of the United States, Israel, and the European Union.

The utter lack of unintended irony in this article is priceless. And that little implied threat at the end is just the icing on the cake.

Terror attack in Nahal Oz - what are the motives?

From YNet:

Two Israeli men in their 30s were killed Wednesday afternoon in exchanges of fire that erupted near the Nahal Oz terminal in the central Gaza Strip, the Magen David Adom emergency services reported. Medical teams were making their way to the scene of the incident.

Three Palestinians were killed in an ensuing Israel Air Force strike in Gaza City, sources in the Strip said.

The IDF reported that an army aircraft struck and hit a vehicle carrying gunmen who were involved in the shooting attack in Nahal Oz.
...
"This a cynical attack," an official added. "On the one hand, Hamas complains of the blockade on Gaza, and on the other hand it is responsible for the attack on the fuel terminal, which provides gas and fuel to the residents of the Strip," he stated.

Ha'aretz adds:

Channel 2 TV said the infiltrators set fuel depots afire.

The extent of damage to the facility was unclear, but the attack threatened to exacerbate Gaza's already delicate humanitarian situation . Plumes of smoke billowed up from the depot, the sole conduit of fuel to Gaza's 1.4 million residents.

People try to find logic in the targets that Palestinian Arab terrorists hit, but they miss the point:

The terrorists hit wherever they can. Certainly they might try to abduct rather than kill Israelis, but for the most part they will kill any Israeli in the Middle East that they can. Thanks to Israeli defenses, they don't have the luxury of choosing targets based on perceived symbolic value; they will choose the weakest point they can find and kill whomever they can, not caring if the victims are women, children, Arabs or Jews, and cause all the damage and panic they can.

In this case, the fact that they set Gaza's main fuel depot on fire shows that their bloodlust and intense desire to feel powerful is more important than prosaic concerns like the humanitarian situation in Gaza. (Not to discount the fact that they have a great interest in maintaining a humanitarian crisis in Gaza, but that wasn't the goal.)

These are crimes of opportunity, plain and simple.

April 9, 1948: The end of Palestinian Arab military leadership

The 1948 war was striking in the paucity of Palestinian Arab military leaders. Almost all of the major leaders in the war against the Jewish state were from neighboring Arab countries, rushing in to destroy Israel before it started.

There were a couple of exceptions, but the effective end of Palestinian Arab war leaders occurred on April 8, 1948 (reported in the April 9 Palestine Post:)

It turns out that Salameh (who had parachuted into Palestine in 1944 along with Nazi paratroopers) did return to Lydda later in April, and was killed in June. (And, as noted there, his son was one of the architects of the Munich Olympic massacre, assassinated by the Mossad in 1979.)

Another use for a burqa

Firas Press (Arabic) reports a story about an Egyptian man who was not allowed to marry the woman he loved, presumably due to family objections.

His sweetheart agreed to marry another man, and this Egyptian decided he wanted to secretly attend the wedding.

So he covered himself in a burqa and went in drag.

Unfortunately, he made a mistake - he didn't change his shoes.

The women immediately recognized that he was an impostor and his plan was foiled.

Yes, the kid was killed by a Palestinian Arab mortar

Yesterday I posted a large number of articles about a child killed in Gaza and compared how these "news" sources reported Palestinian Arab claims that the child was killed by an Israeli tank shell. Some of them took the Palestinian claims at face value, and the ones that noted Israel's denials buried that information much lower in the article.

Well, today the Palestinian Center for Human Rights came out with their investigation of the issue, and, sure enough, the kid was killed by his peaceful Gazan neighbors:

On Sunday evening, 6 April 2008, ‘Abdullah Mohammed Bahar, 4, was killed and his brother, ‘Abdul Jawad, 8, was wounded when a mortar shell fell near their house in al-Boreij refugee camp in the central Gaza Strip.

According to investigations conducted by PCHR, at approximately 15:00 on Sunday, a mortar shell fell near a house belonging to Mohammed Suleiman Bahar, 51, in the east of al-Boreij refugee camp in the central Gaza Strip. As a result, two of the owner’s children were wounded when they were playing near the house: ‘Abullah, 4, wounded by shrapnel to the head and the chest; and ‘Abdul Jawad, 8, wounded by shrapnel to the head. The two children were evacuated to al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in Deir al-Balah town, but ‘Abdullah died shortly after arriving at the hospital.

Will we be seeing any corrections from the many media that - as always - reported the lying Palestinian "witnesses" and "medical sources" without skepticism and gave them more credence than Israeli claims that are almost inevitably vindicated?

Previous examples of Palestinian Arabs blaming Israel for deaths they committed themselves here, here, here, here and here, just to list a few.

The 2008 Palestinian Arab Self-Death count is now at 56, with 11 children. Which, in PalArab terms, is roughly half a "holocaust."