Monday, August 26, 2024

  • Monday, August 26, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
Muslim media is going crazy, claiming that National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir plans to build a synagogue on the Temple Mount.

That isn't what he said. He said, "If I could do what I wanted, a synagogue would also be established on the Temple Mount."

And obviously that is not something he can do. 

Now, reasonable people can argue whether he was impolitic in saying this, or whether it is a stupid thing to say, Ben Gvir is being pilloried as much in the Israeli media as in the Arabic media.

But Ben-Gvir is correct. Jews should have equal rights on the Temple Mount, including prayer, including even building a synagogue. 

Why would any reasonable person disagree with equal rights?  They can say that it is not a good idea practically, but no one can say that Jews have no historic or religious or legal claim to the Temple Mount, the holiest site in Judaism.  

All the other issues - politics, security, public relations - exist and are real, but they are all secondary to human rights. The right for Jews to access and pray at their holiest spot is a human right.

The "status quo" is inherently a violation of Jewish human rights.


If it was up to me, yes, I would build a synagogue there. Perhaps in the large plaza on the southeast of the Mount, where one hardly ever sees Muslims (except playing soccer.) This is part of the Mount that was not a part of the original site, only built as an extension in Herodian times, and there is no possible way it is on the site of the original Temples which would be forbidden under Jewish law. 

There are also solid reasons why building a beautiful, large synagogue there would be good for Israel and for the region. 

I have no problem with the government of Israel promising to uphold the status quo for temporary political reasons, but it should make it clear but we will never concede the rights of Jews to ascend and worship there.





Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Monday, August 26, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
Sheikh Muhammad Sakr, preacher of a Bethlehem mosque, was arrested over the weekend by the Palestinian Authority.

The reason? Because on Friday, he accused the government of colluding with Jews during a sermon.

Sakr said, "The Palestinian Authority coordinates security, serves the occupation, pursues the mujahideen, and hands over wanted persons [to Israel] and is not ashamed of that. It is also not ashamed when it offers its services in settling matters after the war."

He continued, "They will enter Gaza if the Jewish entity allows them, with the permission of the Jews and under the protection of the Jewish soldiers, to confirm that the Palestinian Authority and the Palestinian organization are the ones with authority and responsibility over the entire land of the State of Palestine. What cleverness and stupidity is this?"

As soon as this speech was spread on social media, Muhammad Sakr was arrested by the PA.

I have no doubt that the sheikh is a terrorist supporter. But this sort of repression of free speech is an everyday occurrence under Palestinian Authority rule - the people that the West wants to take over Gaza. 

And no one, besides those who support Hamas, seem to have a problem with this. 

 The media needs to simplify everything into a binary of "good guys" and "bad guys" because they consider their audience to be too stupid to understand that often the "good guys" are bad as well. Activists understand this well, and do everything possible to tar Israel as the "bad guy" in every possible fashion, which makes Palestinians the "good guys." 

No one wants to mention that Israel would never arrest a preacher unless he directly incites violence. Direct comparisons of rights and laws and reality are to be avoided at all costs. 

Stories like this that show that even the "good" Palestinians are worse than any conceivable Israeli action  never see the light of day because the narrative is more important than the truth.



Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Monday, August 26, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
Hezbollah is being roasted mercilessly on social media for its "henocidal" attack on Israel Sunday morning that only managed to kill several chickens.

Some of the memes are really funny.






However, there was another chicken story from the region this past month that the media missed.

Fresh chickens are being imported into Gaza.

Gaza restaurants - yes, there are open restaurants in Gaza - have been offering chicken this month, at quite reasonable prices.

The Elomda Restaurant in Deir al Balah offers chicken and shawarma.


Sara and her friend went to a shawarma restaurant in southern Gaza a week ago.


Takeout chicken in northern Gaza earlier this month.



Chicken for a family outing at the beach in early August.



Making schnitzel in Gaza (although the processed chicken is from a can)


The Thailandy restaurant in central Gaza  has been offering shawarma to hundreds of customers this month.


The evil Israelis are sending their non-kosher chickens to Gaza (the Hebrew sticker says they are "treyf.")


The price is less than $2.50 a pound.

In late July, Al-Marai al-Taibeh meat and fish importers showed huge pallets filled with fish and poultry imported from Israel.



Gaza doesn't exactly look like sub-Saharan Africa. 

All of this comes from the incomparable Imshin who follows Palestinian social media and brings stories that are way too difficult for the professionals to publish.






Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Monday, August 26, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon

Hezbollah made no secret that it was using the Quran and Islam as justifications for its attack on Israel Sunday morning.

The Israeli media mentioned this, but I could not find anything about this on the New York Times site, or the Washington Post, or AP, or Reuters. 

For example, the second Hezbollah statement about its attack was prefaced with part of a Quranic verse (32:22): "We shall take vengeance upon the criminals." In other words, this was a vengeance operation, and had nothing to do with land or Gaza. To the media, it is assumed that Muslims are immature beings who cannot stop themselves from attacks on their enemies when their honor is at stake, but they never mention the religious justifications for their actions, because they don't want to be called Islamophobic and they also don't want to claim that they know the Quran better than Hezbollah leaders. 

Even more obvious, and striking in how it wasn't mentioned in the mainstream media I checked, was that the failed attack was launched on Arbaeen, a Shiite holiday. In fact, Hezbollah named the attack "Operation Arbaeen Day." Whenever anyone attacks a Muslim on Ramadan, they say how disgusting it is to attack on an Islamic holy month, but they attack on Ramadan - and on other of their holidays - all the time. 

One of the myths that the media and "experts" insist on is that Muslim attacks on Israel are only about land, or "occupation," or "supporting Palestinians." 

They really hate to mention any Islamic religious justification for their attacks, even when the attackers themselves say that. Because they want to blame Israel for all unrest, and Israel cannot change the Muslim calendar.

So the Islamic component of Iran, Hezbollah, Houthis, Hamas and Islamic Jihad attacks on Israel get swept under the rug.

Which is exactly what happened on Sunday.





Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

Sunday, August 25, 2024

Tuvia Tenenbom's books all have the same style: Tenenbom goes around the world and uses his disarming personality to get people - often antisemites - to reveal things they would never tell anyone, or he uses faux-naivete to expose the hypocrisy of his targets. 

One theme that goes through his books is that he genuinely likes most ordinary people (and especially their food) while he finds most leaders and officials to be hypocrites.

In his latest book,  "Careful, Beauties Ahead!", Tenenbom is using his trademark interview style, but the subject is more personal than in previous books. Tuvia grew up as a haredi Jew in Bnei Brak, and in this book he spends a year among the Chassidic and Litvish (yeshivish) Jews of Israel. 

As a religious Jew myself, even though I am not haredi, this makes the book more personal for me as well.

Tuvia spends most of the time in Mea Shearim, the religious neighborhood in Jerusalem. He gravitates towards the most extreme anti-Zionist Jews but he doesn't ask them much about Zionism. He asks them about God, about spirituality, about angels, about the resurrection of the dead, about why women cover their hair after marriage. He then returns to the neighborhood of his youth in Bnei Brak.

It is easy to cheer him on when his targets are antisemites in Germany or the UK. When he talks about Torah leaders, it makes makes it more challenging to try to distinguish between his own personal biases and what he actually observed himself. 

For example, he grew up near Rav Chaim Kanievsky, a giant of Torah learning, but he always regarded him as weird. He gets people to say negative things about the now-late leader of Orthodox Jewry, but doesn't mention anything positive about him.  

One striking part of the book is that he discusses how ordinary Chassidim make a "kvittel," a piece of paper that they write their names on, and have glorious stories about how their Rebbes have miraculously discerned amazing details of questioners' lives based just on the kvittel. When Tuvia manages to visit three separate Chassidic rebbes, every one of them tell him that they cannot do anything supernatural with the kvittels. 

For me, who wants to see more Jewish unity, Tuvia's descriptions of  infighting within the Chassidic community and antipathy towards Jews outside it are distressing. The book meanders with his travels, but one theme that emerges is the split between the "old Ger" and the "new Ger" Chassidim, and the threats by the old Ger leaders to ostracize those who want to follow the new one. 

Similarly but more amusingly, Tuvia documents how the the main Satmar study hall/bais medresh has an announcement prohibiting anyone from studying who does not wear an overcoat or who speaks Hebrew instead of Yiddish. An observer tells Tuvia that the rule has nothing to do with Zionism but is meant to exclude Sephardic Jews, whose own bais medresh does not have air conditioning or free coffee, so they would go to study at Satmar. 

In Mea Shearim, there is a lot of anti-Zionist graffiti. Tennebom doesn't definitively identify those who are responsible, but it appears to be youths who really cannot hack all day study in yeshiva. Of course, these are the ones who would be first drafted into the Israeli army. 

One of the sadder parts of the book, for me, was the ignorance of the subjects - and even some of the Chassidic leaders. They couldn't answer basic questions about Judaism. The main exception was a  teacher at the ba'al teshuva yeshiva Aish HaTorah who answered most of Tenenbom's questions (not to Tuvia's satisfaction) and then emailed Tenenbom the sources to the answers he didn't know. But most of the Chassidim could not point to sources for customs; one could not distinguish between a midrash about Korah's followers and what it says in the Torah about him. He also makes a good point about how the haredi world is woefully ignorant of the books of the Prophets. 

Tuvia being Tuvia, he also eviscerates an anti-Haredi secular scholar he interviewed who claims that every child in Mea Shearim is the victim of sexual abuse and none of them contribute to the economy (80% of Haredi women work, but they don't seem to count in the calculations of the progressives.) 

Tenenbom ends off with his observations that despite his criticisms, these are his people. He is more comfortable and feels more at home among the otherworldly Chassidim of Mea Shearim than with the genteel gentiles of Berlin or New York. Most of the religious Jews he meets, he loves. He describes the soulfulness of praying extremely slowly and of a Chassidic shalosh seudos that extends way past Shabbos. 

Despite his many criticisms and jibes, and the book is filled with them, these are his people - and he feels that affinity with them far more than the secular and Reform Jews he meets along the way. 

Conversely, Tuvia writes that he went back to visit the community on the following Simchat Torah . He didn't need more material for the book; he visited because he wanted to be with his new friends for a very happy holiday. 

It was October 7, 2023. 

His new friends asked him what all the sirens meant, since they couldn't see the news during the holiday. When he found out and told them, the universal response to the news of the Hamas massacre of mostly secular Jews was horror and prayers. All the rhetoric he had heard and seen about how much they hate non-haredim disappeared when there was a real tragedy among fellow Jews. 

That is the real theme of the book. Jews love to argue, they disagree vehemently about everything, and in the Land of Israel they ironically have more freedom to be vociferous about their disagreements because one does not put on pretenses of civility among family. But in the end, we are all family, and the supposedly extreme "ultra-Orthodox" are more loving of their fellow Jews than the progressive, secular Jews who pretend to want a world like John Lennon's' "Imagine." 

"Careful, Beauties Ahead!" is at least twice the size of Tenenbom's other books I've reviewed, possibly because the subject matter means so much more to him. Any discomfort one may feel when reading the book is more than offset by Tuvia's honesty, humor and humanity.





Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

From Ian:

JPost Editorial: Kamala Harris, don't place Israeli, Palestinian narratives on equal footing
Acutely aware of the anti-Israel protests outside the convention hall, she started off by unabashedly voicing her pro-Israel stance. “Let me be clear. I will always stand up for Israel’s right to defend itself, and I will always ensure Israel has the ability to defend itself,” she declared, evoking a standing ovation from the packed hall. “Because the people of Israel must never again face the war that a terrorist organization called Hamas caused on October 7, unspeakable sexual violence and the massacre of young people at a music festival.”

Then she quickly shifted to Gaza, saying that what has happened there over the past 10 months is devastating. “So many innocent lives lost, desperate, hungry people fleeing for safety. Over and over again, the scale of suffering is heartbreaking.”

Harris reiterated that she and Biden are working to end the Israel-Gaza war so that “Israel is secure, the hostages are released, the suffering in Gaza ends, and the Palestinian people can realize their right to dignity, security, freedom and self-determination.” According to commentators, that comment elicited the loudest applause in the foreign policy section of her speech.

Her Republican opponent, former president Donald Trump, responded to her speech in real time on Truth Social. Harris, he charged, stands for “incompetence and Weakness,” adding that “Our Country is being laughed at all over the World!” With regard to her comments on Israel, Trump added: “SHE HATES ISRAEL – Wouldn’t even show up to Congress for [Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu’s session!” referring to his speech to the joint session last month.

Some commentators such as the NYT’s Sanger said the speech signaled that Harris planned to continue Biden’s policy if she wins the presidential race on November 6.

“Acutely aware that the Gaza issue and the protests it spurred on college campuses had left the administration caught between two powerful constituencies – pro-Israel Democrats and younger progressives – she was looking for a way to quiet the issue for the next three months,” Sanger wrote. “In the end, Ms. Harris relied on a forceful tone to address the protesters in the party, rather than a change in policy.”

On the other hand, Vox analyst Zach Beauchamp argued that Harris “displayed empathy for both sides [Israel and the Palestinians] while also implicitly distancing herself from Biden’s unbalanced pro-Israel approach.”

Too often, he wrote, “people discussing this topic feel the need to only recognize one of these narratives – and in American politics, that’s most often the Israeli one. Yet Harris placed them on truly equal footing.”

While it remains to be seen if Harris follows or strays from Biden’s approach, we urge her not to draw a moral equivalency between the Israeli and Palestinian narratives, especially while Hamas is still holding Israelis hostage in Gaza.
Noah Rothman: On the Gaza War, Kamala Harris Says a Lot of Nothing
Why have “innocent lives” been lost in Gaza, and why are its people “desperate” and “hungry”? Because Hamas has abused the people over whom it presides. Their only value to Hamas is as sympathetic corpses. Why are they “fleeing to safety”? Because they are being evacuated via no-fire corridors by the IDF to temporary refugee cordons. Israelis do not oppose Palestinian self-determination. Before October 7, they regularly expressed support for that outcome, although that sentiment had eroded with every “round” of hostilities inaugurated by Hamas and like-minded terrorist groups. Successive Israeli governments have made dozens of concessions over the decades in the effort to make Palestinian self-determination a reality. Where the pro-Palestinian Left heard a rebuke of Israel, Israel’s friends heard pablum.

“And know this,” Harris closed, “I will never hesitate to take whatever action is necessary to defend our forces and our interests against Iran and Iran-backed terrorists.”

Well, that should be that. Hamas is very much one of those “Iran-backed” terrorist organizations — one of many in the region with American blood on its hands. Its destruction is in America’s immediate national-security interests. Harris refused to identify the real obstacle blocking her preferred pathway to peace, likely to preserve the delusion that Benjamin Netanyahu is the recalcitrant party here. But it is Hamas that has rejected every temporary cease-fire on offer, and it is Hamas that will not accept its own dissolution. Obviously.

If Harris were compelled by her own logic, she would clear the way for the IDF to finish the job in Gaza, neutralize Hamas, and open the door to a better future in which a responsible civilian authority might succeed the terrorist regime under which Gazans have long suffered. That, not mollifying an unyielding mob, is the path of least political resistance.

But Harris hasn’t earned anyone’s trust yet. The anti-Israel/pro-Hamas activists are crestfallen today. They cannot be appeased, and it was foolish of Harris to make the attempt. Even her perfunctory nod in the general direction of their concerns will embolden them to keep menacing the Democratic Party until it capitulates to their demands. Pro-Israel Americans are probably just as unsatisfied. They need to know if, by giving Israel “the ability to defend itself,” Harris means defensive weapons alone — just enough support to keep Israeli civilians from dying en masse, but not enough to eliminate the threats that regularly force Israelis to flee their homes, huddle in bunkers, or spend restless nights wondering if their families will be murdered in their beds.

Harris will have to do more. We know the vice president is for peace. How she intends to secure that peace remains a mystery.
Caroline Glick: JNS poll: Israelis willing to defy US to defend national interests
With the U.S. pushing Israel to avoid taking action against Iran or Hezbollah in Lebanon that risks intensifying the regional war, JNS/Direct Polls asked Israelis a series of questions on Aug. 19 about how they assess the Biden-Harris administration’s commitment to Israel’s security and how they feel about defying the administration’s wishes on a series of pressing issues.

When asked to what extent they believed Biden and Harris when they declare their commitment to Israel’s security, 38% of respondents said that they have great faith in the U.S. leaders’ commitments to Israel’s security. Twenty-one percent said they somewhat believed them, 22% said they had little faith in their commitment, and 19% said they have no faith in the U.S. leaders’ commitment to Israel’s security.

On the other hand, only 34% of Israelis believe that Biden and Harris are committed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Sixty percent do not believe them. And 6% have no opinion.

Fifty percent of Israelis believe that following the events of Oct. 7, Israel should give less consideration to the U.S. administration’s positions on foreign affairs and national security issues. Twenty-three percent said that Israel’s position should be unchanged from what it was on Oct. 6, and 22% said Israel should give greater consideration to the U.S. position.

These numbers were reflected in answers to specific questions.

Fifty-two percent of Israelis said that in the event the U.S. asks for Israel not to carry out a military operation in Lebanon or attack Iran’s nuclear installations, Israel must defy the U.S and act in accordance to its interests. Another 29% said that it depends on the circumstances in which the U.S. makes the request. Eighteen percent of Israelis responded that Israel must abide by such an American request.

JNS asked the Israeli public what they believed was responsible for the rising levels of animosity towards the Jewish state among Democrats.

Forty-five percent of respondents attributed the growing hostility to the presence of extreme progressive view in the American body politic. Thirteen percent attributed the hostility to either the Israeli government or the American Jewish community. Twenty-six percent of Israelis said that progressive opinion and hostility towards the Israeli government and American Jews were equally responsible for the rising levels of hostility. And 16% said neither of the choices was accurate.
  • Sunday, August 25, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon


Human Rights Careers is a website to help aspiring human rights workers learn more about the field, provide online courses and showcase various job opportunities.

It also showcases how much anti-Israel propaganda.is an inherent part of the larger human rights community.

Very few articles on the site target any specific country. There are passing mentions about human rights in Iran buried in much longer articles. But three of their articles are primarily written with Israel in mind.

One of them is explicitly pro-BDS and calls Israel genocidal, making Israel the only country in the world that these human rights professionals say they want to boycott. 

The title is "Academia in Times of Genocide: Why are Students Across the World Protesting?  There is not one word against Hamas or even mention of Hamas, starting off with, "Protest encampments have sprung up at university campuses around the world in recent months, calling for an end to the Israeli occupation of Palestine and atrocities committed in Gaza. The protests have been sparked by the events following the attack on October 7th, 2023, which led to a severe military response from Israel. "

Some people did,....something.

The article praises the students for their actions, not saying a word about their antisemitism and targeting of Jews on campus. The article then castigates the London School of Economics for refusing to accede to student demands to boycott Israel. 

There are no articles calling for LGBTQ rights in Muslim majority countries. But there is one that somehow pretends that the bogus charge of "pinkwashing" in Israel is a human rights issue. 

Instead of praising Israel for its gay-friendly policies, it condemns Israel for publicizing its gay-friendly policies, as if that somehow hurts Palestinians. It is a conspiracy theory that the only reason Israel helps the LGBTQ community is to hide how awful it really is. Any conspiracy theory about Israel is antisemitism. 

A third article discusses NGOs helping Palestinians.  Again, there is no comparable article for any other  human rights issue. A number of the NGOs they recommend explicitly support BDS, meaning they are antisemitic as well.

Beyond that is the article's own execrable description of the October 7 massacre: 
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has caused immense suffering, with countless individuals displaced, harmed, and killed over the years. Tensions heightened on October 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked Israel, leading to Israeli retaliation and worsening the conflict. This escalation has created a severe humanitarian crisis in Gaza, with 2.8 million people, including 1.2 million children, in need of assistance amidst airstrikes and bombings. 
Oh, Hamas attacked Israel? Like, they shot rockets or sent their army to fight the IDF? 

Not once, as far as I could tell, does the site mention a single Israeli civilian being attacked by anyone. 

Besides some random mentions of the Holocaust - which minimize that as well - the site simply does not consider Jews today as being worthy of human rights protections. 

(h/t Jill)



Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Sunday, August 25, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon


There is a science to figuring out the truth between competing press statements.

Both Israel and Hezbollah issue statements all the time, and both try to spin the statements in a way where they cannot be caught in a lie but where the message spins their actions as being successful.

This is what happened after this morning's strikes in Lebanon and Israel. The statements sound like they are diametrically opposed, until you read them carefully. 

The IDF statement, as Times of Israel reports:
“Before dawn, we identified Hezbollah preparations to carry out launches against the north and center [of Israel]. Some 100 Israeli Air Force fighter jets preemptively struck to remove the threats,” Hagari says.

“Hundreds of rocket launchers armed with thousands of launch barrels. Most of them were aimed at northern Israel. We also struck drones that were aimed at central Israel,” he says.

“Hezbollah planned to launch hundreds of rockets at the north of the country and drones at central [Israel]. We removed a larger threat, likely a future threat in some areas, with an emphasis on the rockets at northern Israel,” Hagari says, adding that the strikes took place in around 40 areas of southern Lebanon.

We foiled most of Hezbollah’s planned attack, and we intercepted many of the threats launched at Israel,” he says.
Hezbollah released three separate statements, as its Al Mayadeen mouthpiece reports:

  The Islamic Resistance in Lebanon – Hezbollah launched an "initial response" to the assassination of Commander Martyr Fouad Shokor at dawn Sunday, on the anniversary of Imam Hussein's Arbaeen, by launching a large number of drones deep into the occupied Palestinian territories.

In a statement, the Resistance clarified that the attack targeted a strategic Israeli military site, adding that details about the specific target "will be disclosed at a later time."

Hezbollah released another statement that begins with a Quranic verse that states, "Indeed We shall take vengeance upon the guilty."

In its statement, Hezbollah confirmed that it had successfully completed the first phase of its response to the assassination of Martyr Shokor.

In this phase, Hezbollah targeted Israeli barracks and sites to facilitate the passage of attack drones towards their intended target deep within the occupied Palestinian territory. The drones successfully reached their destination as planned, according to the statement.

Secondly, the statement confirms that the number of Katyusha rockets fired exceeded 320, targeting enemy positions.

The statement concluded with a list of successful targets in the occupied Palestinian territory as part of the first phase of the response, which includes:

1. Meron Base
2. Naftali Ze'ev artillery position
3. Zaitoun Base
4. Zaoura artillery positions
5. Al-Sahel Base
6. Kila Barracks in the occupied Syrian Golan Heights
7. U.F. barracks in the Syrian Golan Heights
8. Nafah Base in the Syrian Golan Heights
9. Yardan Base in the Syrian Golan Heights
10. Ein Zivitim Base
11. Ramot Naftali Base

In the wake of the military strikes, Hezbollah issued a third statement declaring that it had successfully launched all its attack drones at the designated times from their respective launch sites. The drones crossed the Lebanese-Palestinian border, targeting their intended objectives through multiple routes.

Hezbollah dismissed claims by the Israeli occupation that it had preemptively disrupted the operation and neutralized the attack as baseless and contrary to the facts on the ground. These claims will be addressed in detail later in a speech by Hezbollah Secretary-General, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, whose date will be set later on Sunday, the statement added.
Hezbollah claims that it targeted multiple specific sites in the north of Israel, including with hundreds of rockets, to support the main attack towards a presumably high value military site in central Israel. Israel's statements do not deny that, saying that "most" of Hezbollah's attack was thwarted - but not all. 

Israel says it hit some, not all, of the drones aimed at central Israel. 

Hezbollah denies that Israel's pre-emptive airstrikes affected their plans, while the Israeli statement indicated that those strikes were aimed at "likely a future threat." 

So far, they are not contradicting each other.

It is possible that Hezbollah aimed drones at multiple sites in Israel, including Tel Aviv, and Israel successfully stopped most of them, but not all. 

If we are to believe both sets of statements, perhaps a Hezbollah drone did manage to hit a single high value - or symbolic - military site in central Israel but at this point we do not know how much, if any, damage it may have inflicted, or how many sites it targeted. Hezbollah is now claiming only a single target, but that doesn't preclude that it originally tried for multiple targets and knows it failed to hit most of them.

 Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah will presumably mention the target and declare victory in this phase 1 of Hezbollah's attack this afternoon.






Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Sunday, August 25, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
There's a Watergate-era adage that the coverup is worse than the crime. The UN is now trying to cover up its knowledge of sexual abuse by humanitarian workers in Gaza.

Last month, I discovered a 72-page UN report released in April  by the PSEA [Protection from Sexual Exploitation and Abuse] Network called the "Risk mitigation assessment report to prevent sexual exploitation and abuse in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank." It included this:

According to the SEARO 2022 Index, Palestine ranked in the 20th position among the context with higher risks of SEA. Yet, the onset of the war has challenged the resilience of the network and a completely different context is unfolding with important emergent risks of sexual exploitation and abuse by aid workers and related personnel....
Food insecurity, loss of livelihoods, and acute aid dependency are highly engendered matters that further expose women and children to SGBV [sexual gender-based violence] and VAC [violence against children], including by Aid Workers. 

[H]umanitarian actors must scale up their PSEA and Safeguarding capacity to prevent an epidemic of SEA abuses committed by personnel related to humanitarian operations. This should be also seconded by programmatic actions to protect  the most vulnerable from sexual exploitation and abuse by aid workers but also other actors. 
Several times it warned that there was sexual abuse by aid workers in Gaza, and even warned of a potential "epidemic." 

There were two different places on the Internet where this report could be found. One was on the UNICEF website, and the other was on the website of the PSEA Network.

If you go to the UNICEF link today, you get a login screen. Only authorized UN workers can access the report that used to be available to the world. 

And the PSEA link? The report can be found at the moment from a Google search, but it appears to be "orphaned" - I cannot find any reference to it from the PSEA webpages. This strongly indicates that it used to be visible on their webpages (for Google to index it) but no longer is. A site search looking for that report title comes up empty.

Another interesting finding is that the PSEA country dashboard map allows you to click on any country to see statistics - but when you click on "OPT" in the map, meaning the Palestinian territories, you get another login page instead of the summary page. That might be a glitch - the login page does not appear when you click on "Palestine" in the menu, and that data is from 2022. Still, it msakes one wonder why the Palestinian link behaves differently from all others on the map.




Since I first discovered UN reports mentioning aid worker sexual abuse in Gaza, including forcing women into prostitution to get food aid,  the only news site to pick up the story has been The Jerusalem Post.  

And now it appears that UNICEF and the PSEA Network are both trying to make it difficult for anyone else to see their April report that describes this problem.

That report also indicates that it is likely that the aid workers they are talking about are UNRWA workers. "The vast majority of aid workers currently in the Gaza strip are Palestinians, particularly from UNRWA who prior to the war counted with a work force of 13,000 employees" it says.  This is not conclusive, but shouldn't this be more transparent?

Or does the world really not care about terrible things happening in Gaza unless they can blame Jews?





Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

Saturday, August 24, 2024

From Ian:

'If we stayed in Gaza, Oct. 7 wouldn't have happened,' says general who led evacuation
Even when he commanded the evacuation of Gush Katif, retired Major-General Gershon Hacohen felt it was a mistake. But even in his darkest predictions, he could not have imagined the massacre on October 7. In a recent interview, Hacohen claimed that October 7 was made possible because it evacuated the Jewish communities in the Gaza Strip.

Nineteen years after Israel's departure from the Strip, he reflects on the mindset that led to the disaster, the failure of military commanders, the responsibility of the political echelon, the increasing Iranian threat, and the future.

In the days following the massacre, amidst the horror and cries, while the army remained uncertain about when the ground invasion of Gaza would occur, Hacohen publicly supported the offensive. It wasn't a simple or popular stance. While many soldiers and commanders called for an all-out assault, senior military officers and former generals urged caution, advocating patience or even abandoning the ground operation. Retired Major-General Yitzhak Brick, who had foreseen the events of October 7, gained public favor by arguing that a ground invasion would entangle the army, lead to significant losses, and destabilize the country. Hacohen thought the opposite and voiced his opinion openly. "Then I received messages from women who admired Brick," he recalls. "They told me, 'Why are you in favor of a ground invasion? You're going to kill our children.'" That’s a serious accusation.

"Yes, but it’s also legitimate. After all, these are mothers of soldiers, deeply anxious about their children's fate. But despite understanding their concerns, there comes a time when you must stand and say, 'Do not fear, my servant Jacob,' and take action."

To ensure that action was taken, Hacohen went straight to the top. Together with senior members of the security movement, where he serves as the chairman of the board, he met with Prime Minister Netanyahu to encourage him to initiate a ground operation in Gaza. "I did this because there was considerable hesitation at the political level," he recalls. "The Chief of Staff was receiving calls from retired generals and former Chiefs of Staff, who weren’t aware of the situation on the ground, warning him against a ground invasion. Eventually, someone had to bang on the table and say, 'Give it to me, and I’ll handle it.'"
Hamas official boasts Oct. 7 derailed normalization processes, says never to two states
Hamas political bureau official Ghazi Hamad praised the October 7 attacks during a livestream with the pro-Palestinian NGO Masar Badil at the end of June, stating that they had challenged the normalization of ties between Arab states and Israel and that the war had sold the Palestinian cause to the West, the Middle East Media Research Institute published on Friday.

The same official had previously told Lebanese media that Hamas would repeat October 7 "again and again."

The interview, titled "Al-Aqsa Flood and the Palestinian Resistance Today," saw both Hamad and interviewer Khaled Al-Rehab praise the October 7 attacks on southern Israel - where Hamas terrorists invaded Israel and murdered over 1200 people.

“We say long live October 7, which has brought the Palestinian struggle to the top of the agenda of global politics,” Al-Rehab said in the opening remarks.

Hamad told Al-Rehab that thanks to Western support and its strong economy, Israel “reached the level of normalization with countries in the region to reinforce itself as an element of the region,” but the attacks “turned the tables on this whole view.”

The hostages held captive in Gaza
Hamad claimed that Hamas had sent terrorists to target “the Gaza Brigade of the Israeli army, and the goal was to destroy this brigade and to take some soldiers as prisoners.”

However, Hamas killed a large number of civilians on October 7, including foreign workers and fellow Palestinians. Many of the remaining hostages in their captivity have never served in the Israeli military. One-year-old Kfir and 5-year-old Ariel Bibas, who remain in Gaza, were civilian children abducted.

When previously confronted with this in an interview by the BBC in October, Hamad stormed out.

During the interview, Hamad claimed Hamas did not intend to kill any civilians during its assault.

When the interviewer stressed that many civilians were killed and asked if Hamad believed that Hamas’s murder of civilians in their beds was justified, Hamad ripped off his microphone and responded, “I want to stop this interview,” before storming out.
'Exhilarated' Lebanese Palestinians rush to join Hamas after October 7
As the war in Gaza drags on, Hamas has begun to face some resistance from the population for its actions, but in Lebanon, Palestinians who have been traditionally excluded from public life are rapidly joining the terrorist organization, according to a report in the New York Times on Saturday.

Ain Al-Hilweh is one of 12 Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon, which were founded in 1948 and have evolved into city-states within a city.

The Lebanese military has kept out of the camps, preferring to let armed Palestinian groups fight it out in the quasi-independent refugee camps.

Journalists have been kept out of the camps by the Lebanese government for years; New York Times journalists were able to sneak into a camp during a funeral and speak with residents.

Hundreds recruited
The journalists spoke with the Hamas chief in the area, Ayman Shanaa, about the recruitment situation.

Shanaa told them that hundreds of young men had been recruited from that area alone but refused to give an exact number.

During the funeral procession, calls of support for Hamas and Yahya Sinwar could be heard loudly and clearly, “Al-Aqsa Flood Battle, the Battle of Glory and Victory. Our blood and our souls we will sacrifice to you, martyr!”

The journalists maligned the loss of Palestinian secular armed groups that dominated the Palestinian side of the conflict. Replacing them is a slew of radical Sunni Islamist groups, of which Hamas is the principal group.

Palestinians generally do not join Hezbollah due to the sectarian difference, mainly Sunni Islamism vs Shia Revolutionaryism, the report noted.

Friday, August 23, 2024

From Ian:

Melanie Phillips: The anti-Jewish candidate
Contrary to Holtzblatt’s strictures, American Jews can be forgiven for being skeptical of Harris’s views on Israel and the Jewish people.

Tragically, however, Holtzblatt was speaking for too many American Jews, who believe that the “social justice” agenda embodies the Jewish concept of tikkun olam, or “repair of the world.”

Holtzblatt wasn’t wrong that compassion and respect for the natural world are Jewish values. But these are also values prized by those of other faiths or none. When dislocated from Judaism, they are no more than Kumbaya values—and so the “intersectional” social-justice agenda, which actually repudiates Jewish principles, has turned into a weapon against Israel and the Jewish people.

Jewish values are fundamentally based on moral responsibility. The social-justice agenda, by contrast, dispenses with moral responsibility altogether for an entire “victim” class based on race and gender. Those people are deemed not to be responsible for their actions, whose bad effects are blamed instead on their supposed “oppressors”—notably, white people, men and Jews.

Since moral choice defines what is to be human, the social-justice agenda is thus the quintessence of racial and dehumanizing bigotry against that supposed “victim” class. It stands for a culture of resentment and grievance that traps the poor permanently in poverty and disadvantage, promotes division and hatred, and is a dagger in the heart of Jewish values and identity.

Harris is, therefore, the anti-Jewish candidate. To disguise this, she is cynically recruiting anti-Israel Jews like Goldenberg to her team. She is also deploying what she presumably regards as her biggest weapon of deception: her husband, Doug Emhoff.

In a cheesy address at the convention, Emhoff played his Jewish card. He said Harris had helped him connect more deeply to his Jewish faith; she accompanied him to synagogue during the high holidays; and she made “a mean brisket” for Passover that “brings me right back to my grandmother’s apartment in Brooklyn; you know, the one with the plastic-covered couches.”

This is aimed at persuading those who think that Jewish identity is about brisket, sepia-colored memories of booba in Brooklyn and twice-a-year synagogue visits that Harris has the interests of the Jewish people at heart.

In fact, Emhoff has a starring role in a circus of deceit being used to launder a viciously anti-Israel and anti-Jewish agenda. There are sacred texts explaining that, too.
I told Christy Moore that a song he performs called Palestine makes me want to leave Ireland
The song, Palestine, which folk singer Christy Moore has been singing for months deserves special mention. Written by Seattle-based Jim Page, it starts: “the Jews and the Arabs lived all the same for 1,000 years until the Zionists came . . .” This is ahistorical demonising of Zionists who, the song goes on, “came in a river and a flood”.

The Zionists who came in “a river and a flood” were Jews persecuted first in pre-war Europe and they also comprised the sorry remnants of the Holocaust, including some of my family. The Zionists who came from the Middle East were expelled from neighbouring Arab countries, mirroring the Palestinian Nakba, from 1946 until 1980, by which time 850,000 Mizrahi Jews had been displaced. These Jews did not have any concept of colonisation; they were all refugees.

There’s more.

“They talk about dollars,” the lyrics continue, which obviously refers to (Jewish) American support of Israel, a dog whistle to the cliched, seemingly evergreen anti-Semitic tropes of dual loyalty and the centuries-old conspiracy theory concerning Jews and money.

The word “jackboot” referring to Israeli behaviour towards Palestinians is the single most jarring note of the song. This is unreconstructed Holocaust inversion. The equivocation of Nazi oppression of Jews to the oppressive behaviour of the Israeli state in the occupied territories towards Palestinians minimises the Holocaust and dispossesses Jews of the worst suffering in their history, still in living memory, ratcheting up hatred towards all Jews, regardless of their political bent.

Christy Moore approached me two years ago when he was about to release 1942, a song about the arrival of a trainload of deported Jews to Auschwitz. He wanted reassurance that he had not unwittingly trampled on sensibilities. I was grateful that he had been so thoughtful and, even more so, when he offered me the song to use in my own advocacy.

I wrote to him expressing my horror at the lyrics of Palestine. I also explained my confusion that he wanted affirmation for the first song but not the second. His reply was courteous and gracious, stating that the song had been sent to him to perform at a gig in aid of Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), which he said came about after three MSF doctors died in an Israeli air strike on their hospital. He said that he had been accused of being both an anti-Semite and a Hamas supporter, an accusation I do not make.

However, I am sure that Hamas are not unhappy with the song. Christy did not answer my questions. I told him that his song makes me want to leave Ireland. He wished me well. He continues to play Palestine.

In extremis, Zionism – like any other form of nationalism – has a racist and bigoted element. In Israel this represents about 7 per cent of the population. The continued expansion of settlements in the West Bank is illegal, unjustified and morally repellent.

But the assault on Zionism has now blurred into full scale anti-Semitism. Why are Jews, alone, not entitled to express their identity through their ancient connection to their homeland? Howard Jacobson again: “The Jews are the most racially abused people in history. To deny them the right to be who they are is racism. Anti-Zionism is itself racism.”

The equivocation of Zionism to nazism is now frequently invoked. I want Israel, where half the world’s Jewish population live, to exist. I want an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, a return of the hostages, an end to regional hostilities and a sustainable, just peace settlement for Israelis and Palestinians based on a two-state solution. This does not make me a Nazi. Anti-Zionism is the new anti-Semitism.
Campus on Fire: Why Antisemitism Matters
In sum, the HOW of this Red-Green Alliance is a case of the “useful idiot” syndrome, a confluence of ideologues who, for the time being, are willing to put some fundamental differences aside to reach their desired goals. For the Reds, who continue to want to overthrow capitalism despite mounds of evidence showing that communism in practice never works, the Islamists are a welcome ally. For the Islamists, the goal is not to overthrow capitalism, but Western democracies. One would think, however, that the Reds would understand that they are being “played” or, far worse, that such an alliance destroys the very pillars they hold dear.

How could they not see the dangers of radical Islam? Is not the Iranian Islamic Revolution of 1979 a cautionary tale of lending one’s support to a regime that is an anathema to the rights of minorities and women, not to mention freedom of the press and assembly? Cautionary because leftist ideologues and theoreticians played a critical role in supporting the overthrow of the Shah of Iran. Leading Marxist literary critic Michel Foucault praised the Islamic revolution in Iran, stating that Iran is the perfect location for a “first great insurrection against global systems.” In sum, Foucault’s worldview contributed to one of the greater heists in the history of Western thought: The blind and largely uncritical support to a backward and anti-progressive Islamic regime led to the butchering of hundreds of thousands of innocent lives.

Undermining the dangers of radical Islam can likewise be seen in how we incorrectly identify the cause of the conflict between Israel and her Muslim neighbors as having to do with territory, race, and oppression when, in reality, the conflict is driven by the religious zealots of Islam. Take, for example, how we are told that Hamas is the radical and unsavory neighbor to Israel’s direct south-west, whereas the Fatah party governing the Palestinian Authority in Judea Samaria, or Area A of the West Bank, is the reasonable peace partner. In Arabic, al-Fatah means “the opener.” Within the context of political Islam, it means to open society up for Islam to rule, what Jonathan Spyer calls a “formula” for political Islam to prosper: “Islamist fervor plus state capacity.”

Interestingly, for the Islamists who have proven to be clever and who are continuing to tolerate the Marxists, the strand of antisemitism shipped to the West takes anti-colonial undertones. To the West, that is, to their sophomoric allies on college campuses, Islamists brand Jews as colonists and racists; to themselves, an entirely different strand of antisemitism takes form: Jews are apes and pigs, unworthy of living as equals in the Middle East.

And so the Red-Green Alliance is, in many ways, a master chicanery. The victims, of course, in all this will be the willing participants who chant “Free Palestine” and “Globalize the Intifada.” But the victims will also be those who minimized campus antisemitism, those who looked away as American flags burned on American streets, and an entire generation of freedom-loving Westerners who know little of the grandiose replacement plans set in motion by radical Islamists.

As recently reported by The New York Post, Jewish graduates of elite NYC schools are avoiding their parents’ and grandparents’ alma mater: Columbia University. “For the first time in over 20 years, we will not have a Ramaz graduate enrolling in Columbia College,” the Ramaz School said recently. And while the rabid Jew-haters who chant “Zionists off our campus” will be pleased, what history teaches is that when Jews flee spaces, these spaces continue to decline. It is not for nothing that the Jewish character of Arthur Miller’s 1993 play “Broken Glass” yelled, “Don’t you understand? When the last Jew dies, the light of the world will go out!” Let us then take this explosion of antisemitism seriously, for in combating Jew-hatred, we fight the greater threat to our vibrant democracy: the Red-Green Alliance.
From Ian:

Brendan O'Neill: Hamas alone is to blame for the deaths of the hostages
The dire fate of the six innocents is an indictment of one thing: the barbarism of Hamas. Two of the men, Haim Peri and Yoram Metzger, were 80 years old. Eighty. What kind of lowlife kidnaps elderly, vulnerable people and forces them into the cold and black of a terrorist dungeon? Another of the men, Avraham Munder, was 79. Then there was Alexander Dancyg, aged 75. These four ageing Jews were all seized from the Nir Oz kibbutz on 7 October by the young, heavily armed racists of Hamas. To compel the frail to become players in your demented war games is ISIS levels of cruelty and depravity.

Then there was Yagev Buchshtab, just 35, cut down in his prime as a result of Hamas’s warmongering. And Nadav Popplewell, 51, who was a British-Israeli. Born in Wakefield. A Yorkshireman who later made his home in the Israeli border town of Nirim. How shameful that British leftists and liberals showed no solidarity with Mr Popplewell upon his death in the captivity of fascists. Not so much as a squeak of anger or sorrow from our self-styled ‘anti-fascist’ movers and shakers following the discovery of the body of a Yorkshire Jew 10 months after he was seized from his home by a movement devoted to killing Jews.

The culpability for the horror in Khan Younis belongs entirely to Hamas. Yes, the exact cause of death is yet to be established. But we know, with not a shred of doubt, the cause of the situation. The cause of the savagery these men found themselves swirled up in. The cause of the hell that enveloped them. It was Hamas’s conscious decision to start a war with Israel. And its calculation that seizing Jews might work to its military benefit. And its deliberate placing of these men in one of its terror caverns in Khan Younis. These men are dead because of the Jew-hate of Hamas.

Western observers’ weird reluctance to discuss Hamas’s responsibility for these six deaths – and their instinct instead to wonder if mad Israel did it – is of a piece with how the whole war is being talked about now. Hamas is constantly invisibilised. That it started the war, and is still fighting it by firing rockets into Israel and bullets into IDF soldiers, is all but memory-holed in the media coverage. Even Hamas’s continued criminal internment of Israeli civilians is turned back on Israel by the Israelophobic press: ‘Don’t do anything that might harm the hostages’, observers bark at Israel, rather than interrogating the depth of depravity Hamas has clearly reached to be able to hold Jewish innocents of all ages for such a long time.

We are witnessing a kind of unwitting absolution of Hamas. It seems the West’s cultural elite, drunk on woke, can only interpret this war through the warping prism of identity politics. So ‘white’ Israel is seen as the only true, conscious actor in the war, while ‘brown’ Hamas are the victims, or at least hapless players whose actions are not worth dwelling on for long. In this twisted vision, Israel acts, Palestine is acted upon – even though it was Hamas’s acting upon Israel on 7 October that started the entire thing. It’s time to stop blaming Israel for everything. It’s time to talk about Hamas’s culpability. It’s time to give evil its due.
Seth Frantzman: Iran cannot be allowed to make this state of alert the new normal
Both Hezbollah and Iran have tried to carve out this new normal of threatening Israel with escalation, when in fact it is Iran and Hezbollah that started this war. Iran backs Hamas and supported the October 7 attack. Haniyeh celebrated that attack publicly in Doha where he was living with Hamas leaders. He prayed and pointed to a television screen on that dark day in a video then posted online, in which he and other Hamas men smiled as they watched the massacre unfolding in Israel.

Hezbollah began to attack Israel on October 8, the day after the Hamas attack. It has since carried out more than 7,500 rocket attacks on Israel and launched more than 200 drone attacks.

The drone attacks have become increasingly deadly. IDF chief warrant officer Mahmood Amaria was killed on August 19 in a Hezbollah drone attack on Ya’ara in northern Israel. He is the latest casualty of Hezbollah’s endless war on Israel.

However, it’s worth remembering that Hezbollah also massacred 12 children in an attack on Majdal Shams in the Golan Heights in July. It was that attack that precipitated Israel’s retaliation, which killed Shukr in Beirut.

Israel has been living under a cloud after October 7. The size of the Hamas attack and its unprecedented death toll has led to a recalibration in the region. Hezbollah, which was wary of attacking Israel, used October 7 as an excuse to open the floodgates of rocket attacks. Iran has also prodded the Houthis in Yemen to attack ships. Iran and its proxies’ goal is to test the resolve of Israel and its allies. Israel faces so many threats on so many fronts today that it has not been able to deter them all. Iran senses this and this is why it has tried to make these kinds of attacks, modelled on the April attack using drones and missiles, the new norm.

For Israel this new situation is not acceptable. Israel has known since the 1950s that it must deter enemies and not be drawn into long wars of attrition. Israel has a hi-tech economy and is closely linked to the West. While Iran and its proxies don’t mind being bankrupt and destroying countries such as Lebanon or Yemen, Israel does not want its economy to suffer.

Israel has more to lose in these confrontations. Iran knows this. It knows that it can threaten and then wait. This waiting game is not in Israel’s interest, or in the interest of Israel’s allies.

The first two weeks of August illustrate the challenge Israel faces. As the one-year anniversary of October 7 approaches, it is important to understand that Israel must not be drawn into a war of attrition in the region where Iran can dictate the tempo. Iran has been dictating the tempo for much of 2024.

The death of Haniyeh was a setback for the Iranian axis. However, Haniyeh reaped what he sowed and Iran knows this. Iran used his death as an excuse to threaten Israel and then it climbed down from the threats to try to keep the region on edge. It’s time for the Middle East and Israel to stop living by Iran’s clockwork.
The new leaders of the Free World
On August 5, Sergei Shoigu, one of Russia’s top military figures, arrived in Tehran for formal meetings, where he promised his country’s “full cooperation” with Iran. His visit coincided with Russian deliveries of radar and air-defense technology that would help Iran to defend against a possible Israeli attack. In Avigdor Haselkorn’s view, these gestures of support reflect an ever-closer alliance among Russia, Iran, Syria, and North Korea:
A good example of the operation of this radical entente came on Sunday, August 11, 2024, when Moscow launched drone and missile attacks against the Kyiv region. According to Mykola Oleshchuk, the Ukrainian air-force commander, the Russians employed, among other weapons, North Korean KN-23 ballistic missiles and Iran-made Shahed kamikaze drones.

On January 8, 2024, the National Intelligence Service (NIS) of South Korea verified that Hamas had been using weapons from North Korea in its war with Israel in Gaza. The NIS released a photo of a North Korean F-7 rocket-propelled grenade with Korean letters inscribed on it. In addition, Israeli forces operating in Gaza had reportedly found North Korean Bang-122 artillery shells and 122mm multiple-rocket launchers.


Haselkorn argues that Israel’s current situation must be seen in light of these global alignments:
A serious U.S. undertaking would . . . seek to take advantage of the Ukrainian offensive against Russia to undermine the entente and reshape the global power balance. To this end, it would give Israel the green light simultaneously to launch an offensive to remove the Hizballah threat on Israel’s northern border. Both Russia and Iran would be put under pressure. Iran’s ability to assist Russia would be curtailed given that its main strategic asset in the region—Hizballah—was being hammered and in need of support, which will aid Ukraine—Biden’s core interest.

In turn, the greater Ukraine’s battlefield successes, the more Russia’s ability to help Iran comes into question and the stronger would be the mullahs’ disincentives to intervene to rescue their Lebanese proxy.

AddToAny

EoZ Book:"Protocols: Exposing Modern Antisemitism"

Printfriendly

EoZTV Podcast

Podcast URL

Subscribe in podnovaSubscribe with FeedlyAdd to netvibes
addtomyyahoo4Subscribe with SubToMe

search eoz

comments

Speaking

translate

E-Book

For $18 donation








Sample Text

EoZ's Most Popular Posts in recent years

Hasbys!

Elder of Ziyon - حـكـيـم صـهـيـون



This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For 20 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.

Donate!

Donate to fight for Israel!

Monthly subscription:
Payment options


One time donation:

Follow EoZ on Twitter!

Interesting Blogs

Blog Archive