SJPLeaks has audio of Marc Lamont Hill saying in September that the pro-Palestinian movement must not "fetishize non-violence", essentially saying that he supports violent "resistance" to Israel - which all Palestinians understand to mean attacking Jewish civilians (and only Jewish civilians.)
This is interesting but not new, since he made the same point in his UN speech.
What is new is that in this audio, Hill accuses Israel of poisoning the water of Palestinians.
The slander that Jews poison the water of non-Jews is a classic antisemitic blood libel that Jew-haters have been pushing since the Black Death of 1348.
Hill is not only accusing Jews of poisoning the water but also of deliberately murdering Palestinian children.
If a far-right personality would say these things, the Left would be merciless on how this is absolute proof of antisemitism. Guess what? This is bona fide proof of Marc Lamont Hill's antisemitism.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
Crazy world: why are the Europeans determined to continue to pour money into the coffers of the most lethal terrorist state in the world, which has been waging a self-declared war against the west for four decades, threatens Israel with extermination and is hell-bent on building nuclear weapons?
Why is the French president Emanuel Macron posturing against western national identity, declaring America to be an enemy and presiding over the disintegration of his country’s internal security while his own citizens are rioting on the streets of Paris against his high-handed policies that treat them with such contempt?
Why has the desire to be part of a shared national identity in the west based on a common culture become tarred as a form of hateful, racist nationalism which threatens minorities – when in fact the opposite is the case ?
Please join me here as I discuss with Avi Abelow of Israel Unwired differences in strategy over Iran, Paris burning down and the nationalism/patriotism debate.
Over the past 22 months, we have focused on a comprehensive peace plan for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. However, irrespective of the plan, Palestinians deserve better lives than they currently have.
We know that the Palestinians are not interested in mere economic peace. Their leaders believe that if Palestinians get too comfortable economically, they would lose interest in the Palestinian cause.
Palestinians are living next door to one of the most technologically successful societies on the planet, yet the Palestinian leadership refuses to engage with Israel for the benefit of ordinary Palestinians. But the Palestinians need economic help now - with or without a peace agreement.
Months ago, in co-ordination with Palestinian, Israeli and American businesspersons, we developed a concept to bring hundreds of high-paying jobs to the West Bank. But the Palestinian leadership blocked the initiative - it's normalization, they say.
This damaging Palestinian policy clouds all economic interaction between Palestinians and Israelis. It directly contradicts what Palestinians agreed to in Oslo. This anti-normalization policy has got Palestinians nowhere and continues to leave them further behind. Palestinians deserve better than calcified positions that have failed to bring peace and failed to bring jobs and opportunity.
Let's be real - 136,000 Palestinians commute to work with Israelis every day because the opportunity is there. Anti-normalization is a failed policy that only hurts the Palestinians.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
There
seems to be a lot of confusion about Hanukah - to the point where it appears to
be deliberate.
Let’s
begin with what it’s not about.
1)It’s not a Jewish Christmas
In many
circles Hanukah seems to have become an imitation Christmas – a holiday of
food, lights, decorations and gifts. This is a sad considering that although
both holidays fall in December, Hanukah has nothing to do with Christmas and
perhaps even more ironically, without Hanukah, Christmas would not exist at all.
All
Jewish holidays feature food, but the food is only a symbol, a reminder of the
miracle of the holiday.
Hanukah
is a holiday of lights but that too is a symbol, to help us remember and
proclaim the miracle of the holiday.
Gift
giving on Hanukah is not a Jewish tradition at all, only a habit adopted by
Jews living near Christians, so that their children would not become jealous of
the gifts Christians receive on their holiday. Giving children Hanukah “gelt”(=money)
is a Jewish tradition. There are different explanations for this. The Rambam
discusses the need to incentivize children to do what will be expected of them
as a grown up thus it is appropriate to provide children an example of giving
in order to teach them to give to those who have less. Additionally, as the
Greek oppressors took Jewish property, giving children money is a symbolic way
to celebrate that we have the freedom to choose what to do with what is ours
(with the emphasis on using money to support spiritual causes rather than
selfish gain). Another explanation is that as even the poorest Jew is supposed
to have candles to light for the holiday, in order to prevent shame from
children begging for their families, it became a tradition to give money to all
the children in the community. Whatever explanation is the correct one (and
possibly all are correct to some extent), the goal of Hanukah gelt is the
antithesis of the Hellenistic desire towards personal enrichment, but rather
being enriched spiritually by using money well.
2)Which miracle?
On
Hanukah children play with dreidels marked with letters designed to remind them
of the miracle of the holiday. This teaching tool differs depending on
location. In the diaspora the dreidels are marked with four letters that say: “A
great miracle happened there.” In Israel the last letter is different,
signifying that: “A great miracle happened HERE.”
As an
American child I didn’t really comprehend
the significance. I knew the word “miracle” from storybooks. I knew
that “there” meant Israel, a place I had visited as a child. But “there” was
far away and had very little to do with my American life.
Without
a concrete explanation of what we were commemorating the symbols of the holiday
loomed larger than the message they are designed to convey. This opens the door
to many unfortunate misunderstandings.
On the
Jewish educational site Judaism 101 it says about Hanukah: Note
that the holiday commemorates the miracle of the oil, not the military victory:
Jews do not glorify war.
Excuse
me?
Of
course, the miracle of the oil is center to Hanukah but that could not have
occurred without the military victory. War isn’t something to be glorified - it’s
ugly, painful and results in grief and anguish but from there to the idea that
Hanukah doesn’t celebrate the military victory is a huge leap.
From
Josephus we learn that the first years following the victory of the Maccabees
there were Hanukah celebrations that did not including Hanukah lights. The
celebration was of victory – of the small band of warriors against the
powerful Greek army, of the small stubborn tribe who clung to their traditions
and religion and did not succumb to the compelling allure of the predominate
Hellenistic culture.
The Hanukah miracle is the miracle of warriors of the body and spirit
who refused to give up their identity and, in their stubbornness, won. THAT is
glorious!
The
miracle of light, the oil that burned for eight days when it only should have
sufficed for a single day is a symbol for the miracle of
retaining identity against all odds - a physical manifestation of the victory
of body and faith over the powers of assimilation.
When the
light of our People should have died out, through faith and hard work,
determination and willingness to suffer for a greater good, it did not. The
light is important because it is a testament to Jewish faith and that, in
return, God grants us miracles. Light without faith would not exist. Light
without the military victory would only be a dramatic folk story, easily
dismissed and quickly forgotten.
It is
the combination of light and victory that makes the miraculous story of Hanukah
complete.
3)Without God there is no victory
Matitiyahu,
father of the Maccabees, was a Cohen, a priest in the Temple. He was also a
warrior, as were his sons.
In an
attempt to erase Jewish culture and ensure the dominance of the Greek culture,
Antiochus erected a statue to Zeus in the Temple in Jerusalem and demanded the
sacrifice of pigs on the altar. It was Matitiyahu, the priest, who set the
standard of unwavering Jewish faith. When the Seleucid Greek government
demanded the sacrifice to the Greek gods, Matitiyahu not only refused to do so,
but slew with his own hand the Jew who had stepped forward to do so. He then
killed the government official that required the act. It was his sons who led
the revolt against the oppressing government and, against all odds – regained
Jewish sovereignty and religious freedom.
Faith is
not a sentiment that can remain in the realm of theory, it calls for action.
Similarly, victory does not occur due to the actions of man, alone.
In the
Torah, before battle, the priest is supposed to tell the Nation (Deuteronomy -
Chapter 20):
"Hear, O Israel, today you are approaching the battle
against your enemies. Let your hearts not be faint; you shall not be afraid,
and you shall not be alarmed, and you shall not be terrified because of them.
Jewish
faith says that God walks with us into battle, to fight for us
and save us. This is not a figurative description but a very literal one. The
Maccabees must have heard this prayer before battle as do IDF soldiers today. This
clip is from Israeli News (Channel 2) at the time of Operation Cast Lead (Gaza
Dec 27, 2008 – Jan 18, 2009). It opens with the IDF Chief Rabbi Rontzki
reciting the prayer before battle.
The
Hanukah song, Maoz Tzur, acknowledges this truth as it appears over and over
throughout Jewish history. In the time of the Maccabees, the exile to Babylon,
from Haman’s attempt at genocide and slavery under Pharaoh – each time the
Jewish people were in danger of being wiped out, physically or through cultural
extermination (assimilation) and each time, in different ways, God saved us
from our enemies.
Without
God there is no victory. Miracles are not a thing of religious fantasy, they
are a tangible experience, the deciding factor between life and death, a nation
victorious or a nation lost.
4)Holiday, not a holy day
Part of
the confusion surrounding Hanukah is that it is a holiday but not a holy day.
The story of Hanukah is that of an event in Jewish history and is not part of
the Torah. The ritualistic elements of Hanukah center around the Hanukah lights,
how they are lit, what prayers are said, not working during the time they are
burning and not doing actions connected with mourning.
Hanukah
is a celebration of Jewish nationalism (which does not exist without God) and
not a holiday of religious holiness although there are some prayers that are
specifically associated with Hanukah. It similar to celebrating Israel’s
Independence Day which also commemorates the victory of a tiny group of
stubborn Jews fighting for sovereignty and freedom, against an enemy much more
powerful and well equipped and – by the grace of God – WINNING.
5)The fight for Judea
King
Arthur and Camelot are part of a glorious but fictitious story about a King
creating a better, kinder reality for England. In contrast, the Maccabees were real
people who fought for Jewish freedom and the sanctity of the Temple on the
Temple Mount in the heart of Jerusalem.
The
Maccabees lived and died in the land which gave the Jewish People our name –
Judea.
Today
the Jewish fight for Judea continues, it is only the methodology and field of
battle that have changed. It is no longer a conquering army but a battle fought
with terminology designed to create a new reality, attempting to influence
public perception in order to affect political policy. International
organizations, companies like Airbnb, the BDS movement and individual Jew-haters
call Judea the “West Bank”, a term that is not geographical but political in
nature (it would be similar to calling Texas, “North Mexico”). - designed to
associate that area of land with Jordan, disconnecting Judea from Zion, as if
Zion would exist without Judea.
Modern
day fiction cannot change Jewish history however it can change Jewish future.
Forgetting our roots enables the fictitious to root itself and become
“alternative facts” which are already being used to wipe us off the map –
literally.
Jews are
from Judea. (And Arabs are from Arabia). It really is that simple.
6)Two front war
The
Maccabees fought a battle on two fronts:
·The physical battle against the army of
Antiochus who tried, by force, to eliminate Jewish identity – occupying the
land, refusing its occupants the right to live and worship as Jews, defiling
the Temple in the heart of Jerusalem.
·The spiritual battle against assimilation,
necessitating confrontation even with other Jews who found Hellenistic culture
alluring and were willing to give up Judaism, to assimilate with the Greeks,
forgetting Jewish uniqueness for the ease of becoming like everyone else.
What
difference is there between the battle of the Maccabees and the fight of Jews
today, particularly Israeli Jews? Today, as in the time of the Maccabees, it
seems it would take a miracle to retain Jewish identity and freedom in the face
of the modern forces hell-bent on eliminating the Jewish State and Jewish
willingness to assimilate in the hope of becoming “like everyone else.”
In a
time when many view nationalism, borders and uniqueness to be evils that must
be expunged from the world, it is convenient to forget what Hanukah is all
about. It is less threatening when Hanukah becomes a trivial imitation of
Christmas, a holiday of lights and doughnuts.
Over the
centuries fear has led Jews to put their heads down and weather the storm of
whatever discrimination or violence was directed at the community: “We survived
Pharaoh, this too shall pass.” Living under oppression led Jews to turn within,
to focus on spirituality, rituals and theories. Destruction of the Temple,
exile and disconnect from the land which gave us our name led Jews to set aside
the physicality of Jews life.
We
forgot that we come from a nation of warriors.
The
re-establishment of the Jewish State led Jews around the world to once again
raise their heads in pride. In theory this was pride in prophesy actualized. In
actuality this was pride in Jewish identity once again becoming complete. The
spiritual Jew, reconnected with the physical Jew. The warrior once again, free
in the land from which our people sprang.
This, of
course, revived an even greater wave of Jew-hate and subsequent Jewish fear. It
is easy for the world to accept the meek Jew, to go through the motions of
sympathy for the dead Jew. Strong Jews who can reach their arm across the globe
to pluck Jews out of the hands of their enemies are a completely different
story. Warrior Jews who refuse to give up, refuse to die and refuse to become
like everyone else are threat to a world that demands that all nations
relinquish identity, uniqueness and borders.
Frightened
Jews, still believe that returning to meekness will appease the haters. If only
the Jewish State was less Jewish maybe the hate would die down. If only
individual Jews would set aside their Jewish identity, they could become like
everyone else and no longer be hated… Fear
makes people irrational and unable to learn from the past.
Hanukah
is the story of Jewish nationalism. An indigenous people, fighting for their
ancestral homeland and tribal rights AND WINNING.
This is
the same Jewish nationalism that was objected to when the Jewish State was
declared in 1948. The same nationalism that was recently defined by the Nation
State law, defining that the Jewish People are the only People who have the
right to self-determination as a nation within the State of Israel. All
citizens have the right to individual self-determination but only the Jewish
Nation has the right to the Jewish State.
No
wonder the Hanukah is being minimized and trivialized. Nothing is scarier than
a Maccabee.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
The Forward has a piece from Maha Nassar claiming that the phrase "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" really means a country where Jews have equal rights with Arabs in all respects. She says that Zionists are purposefully choosing in interpretation of that phrase that Hamas uses, where Jews have no place in the land.
She is correct in saying that Fatah has never explicitly said what it plans to do with Jews and that there was always a subtext of thought that most Jews would naturally want to leave, but they wouldn't be forced out. That is probably true. But that is a long way from pretending that Jews would have the same equal rights in "Palestine" that Arabs do in Israel today.
So assuming that Fatah represents "mainstream" Palestinian thought (even though Hamas did win the only real elections they ever had!) what is its goal?
First of all, Fatah's goal is not the two state solution. The 2009 Fatah platform, that is still in effect, says "The objectives, principles and methods stipulated in the first chapter of the basic law (charter) of Fatah remain the key elements of our Movement and part of the intellectual and political entity of our people." Here is the first chapter of the Fatah charter that is still in effect for the "moderate," non-Hamas Palestinians:
CHAPTER ONE
Principles... Goals.... MethodsThe Movement's Essential PrinciplesArticle (1) Palestine is part of the Arab World, and the Palestinian people are part of the Arab Nation, and their struggle is part of its struggle.
If, as Israel's critics charge, a Jewish state is by its very nature discriminatory against non-Jews, then they have to admit that an Arab state is by its nature discriminatory against non-Arabs. If they claim that Arabs would be more liberal towards Jews than Israel is towards its Arab citizens, they are knowingly lying.
Article (2) The Palestinian people have an independent identity. They are the sole authority that decides their own destiny, and they have complete sovereignty on all their lands.
No room for Jewish political power.
Article (3) The Palestinian Revolution plays a leading role in liberating Palestine. Article (4) The Palestinian struggle is part and parcel of the world-wide struggle against Zionism, colonialism and international imperialism.
Even the idea that Jews might want power would be illegal in Palestine, since Zionism is the enemy, not an alternative national movement that deserves equal weight.
Article (5) Liberating Palestine is a national obligation which necessities the materialistic and human support of the Arab Nation.
Article (6) UN projects, accords and resolutions, or those of any individual which undermine the Palestinian people's right in their homeland are illegal and rejected.
The current love of Palestinians for the UN has nothing to do with accepting international ideals of peace and equality.
Article (7) The Zionist Movement is racial, colonial and aggressive in ideology, goals, organisation and method.
Therefore, Zionists would not be tolerated in Palestine.
Article (8) The Israeli existence in Palestine is a Zionist invasion with a colonial expansive base, and it is a natural ally to colonialism and international imperialism. Article (9) Liberating Palestine and protecting its holy places is an Arab, religious and human obligation.
Jews would have no equal access to holy places. Or access at all.
Article (10) Palestinian National Liberation Movement, "FATEH", is an independent national revolutionary movement representing the revolutionary vanguard of the Palestinian people. Article (11) The crowds which participate in the revolution and liberation are the proprietors of the Palestinian land.
GoalsArticle (12) Complete liberation of Palestine, and eradication of Zionist economic, political, military and cultural existence.
Yes, even Israeli culture must be eradicated. And if Israeli culture includes Jewish holidays and rituals? Take a guess how much respect they would be given if there is the slightest conflict with Arab and Muslim desires.
Article (13) Establishing an independent democratic state with complete sovereignty on all Palestinian lands, and Jerusalem is its capital city, and protecting the citizens' legal and equal rights without any racial or religious discrimination.
See previous note. It would be equal on paper, but in the end it wouldn't be. Would Jews be able to eat in public on Ramadan? Would Jews be able to sell wine?
Article (14) Setting up a progressive society that warrants people's rights and their public freedom. Article (15) Active participation in achieving the Arab Nation's goals in liberation and building an independent, progressive and united Arab society. Article (16) Backing up all oppressed people in their struggle for liberation and self-determination in order to build a just, international peace.
Method
Article (17) Armed public revolution is the inevitable method to liberating Palestine.
This is still part of the Fatah platform, today.
Article (18) Entire dependence on the Palestinian people which is the pedestal forefront and on the Arab Nation as a partner in the fight, and realising actual interaction between the Arab Nation and the Palestinian people by involving the Arab people in the fight through a united Arab front. Article (19) Armed struggle is a strategy and not a tactic, and the Palestinian Arab People's armed revolution is a decisive factor in the liberation fight and in uprooting the Zionist existence, and this struggle will not cease unless the Zionist state is demolished and Palestine is completely liberated. Article (20) Achieving mutual understanding with all the national forces participating in the armed struggle to attain the national unity. Article (21) Revealing the revolutionary nature of the Palestinian identity at the international level, and this does not contradict the everlasting unity between the Arab Nation and the Palestinian people. Article (22) Opposing any political solution offered as an alternative to demolishing the Zionist occupation in Palestine, as well as any project intended to liquidate the Palestinian case or impose any international mandate on its people. Article (23) Maintaining relations with Arab countries with the objective of developing the positive aspects in their attitudes with the proviso that the armed struggle is not negatively affected. Article (24) Maintaining relations with all liberal forces supporting our just struggle in order to resist together Zionism and imperialism. Article (25) Convincing concerned countries in the world to prevent Jewish immigration to Palestine as a method of solving the problem.
There is a law that is explicitly antisemitic in the Fatah constitution. Jews cannot immigrate to "Palestine." But Arabs can. The only tiny sliver of land in the world where Jews can freely immigrate must be destroyed in the Arab concept of a liberal, modern state of Palestine.
Article (26) Avoiding attempts to exploit the Palestinian case in any Arab or international problems and considering the case above all contentions. Article (27) "FATEH" does not interfere with local Arab affairs and hence, does not tolerate such interference or obstructing its struggle by any party.
This is the most liberal interpretation of the phrase "from the river to the sea" possible. There is no Palestinian calling for anything more inclusive of Jews than what is described here.
Anyone who thinks that this is an acceptable or even desirable goal - the creation of yet another Arab state that pay lip service to equality but which is in fact antisemitic (and anti-Christian!) to the core - is fooling themselves.
In reality, the Palestinian state would treat Jews, at best, the same way the Arab political leaders in the West Bank have treated Christians - with such contempt and bias that the vast majority have fled over the decades of both Jordanian and Palestinian rule.
If a state with truly equal rights in the Middle East is the goal, then why does Israel have to be the only state that is morally obligated to be replaced - when it is truly the only state in the world where Jews can have true self determination?
Yes, there is tension in Israel between absolute equality and being a Jewish state. But those who complain that Israel must be dismantled to create an Arab state that would give far fewer rights to Jews than Israel does to Arabs is not interested in equality - they are interested in destroying the human right of self determination for Jews and only Jews. All the talk about a state for all its peoples is simply a catchphrase for destroying the only Jewish state - and replacing it with yet another failed Arab regime.
If there is any iota of evidence that Palestinians can govern themselves in a more enlightened way than any other Arab state, I am anxious to hear about it. And if there is any evidence that a Palestinian state would treat its minorities better than Israel does, by all means, enlighten us.
The very idea is ludicrous, and even Israel's most fervent critics couldn't say with a straight face that a Palestinian state would be more inclusive than Israel is today.
Which means that the people screaming "from the river to the sea" aren't interested in equal rights. They are antisemitic, plain and simple.
.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
This perverse understanding of how wars end led Israel to make extraordinary blunders in the fifteen years after Oslo, for which it was punished by unremitting campaigns of delegitimization and violence, symbolized, respectively, by the Durban conference of 2001 and the Passover Massacre of 2002.
Such nonsense ended during Netanyahu's near-decade-long term as prime minister, but it has not yet been replaced by a sturdy vision of victory. Rather, Netanyahu has put out brush fires as they arose in Sinai, Gaza, the West Bank, the Golan Heights, Syria, and Lebanon. While agreeing with the concept of an Israeli victory when personally briefed, he has not spoken publicly about it.
Meanwhile, other leading figures in Israel have adopted this outlook. Former deputy chief of staff Uzi Dayan called on the army "to return to the path of victory." Former education and interior minister Gideon Sa'ar has stated that "The 'victory paradigm,' like Jabotinsky's 'Iron Wall' concept, assumes that an agreement may be possible in the future, but only after a clear and decisive Israeli victory ... The transition to the 'victory paradigm' is contingent upon abandoning the Oslo concept."
In this context, the statements by Lieberman and Bennett point to a change in thinking. Lieberman quit his position as defense minister out of frustration that a barrage by Hamas of 460 rockets and missiles against Israel was met with a ceasefire; he called instead for "a state of despair" to be imposed on the enemies of Israel. Complaining that "Israel stopped winning," Bennett demanded that the IDF "start winning again," and added that "When Israel wants to win, we can win." On rescinding his demand for the defense portfolio, Bennett emphasized that he stands by Netanyahu "in the monumental task of ensuring that Israel is victorious again."
Opponents of this paradigm then amusingly testified to the power of this idea of victory. Ma'ariv columnist Revital Amiran wrote that the victory the Israeli public most wants lies in such arenas as larger allocations for the elderly and unbearable traffic jams. Meretz leader Tamar Zandberg, replied to Bennett that for her, a victorious Israel means winning Emmy and Oscar nominations, guaranteeing equal health services, and spending more on education.
That victory and defeat have newly become a topic for debate in Israel constitutes a major step forward. As media figure Ayalet Mitsch correctly notes, "even left-leaning Israelis think it's time to win again." Thus does the push for an Israeli victory move forward.
Speaking from the European parliament, Sandell said, “What we have found out, something I heard for quite some time already, from central and eastern European countries that would have an inclination to move their embassy to Jerusalem, this is the natural thing for them to do, is that they have received phone calls from Berlin, from Angela Merkel, the chancellor. Basically, this cannot happen under any circumstances.”
"I have spoken to many Germans these last few days in Brussels," he said. "They are not aware of this, and all of them would be shocked that all of the countries in the European Union today would want to block an embassy move to Jerusalem, not only for your own country, but for other countries that have the conviction [that] this is the right thing to do, the only country to do would be Germany. This is a big shock."
He added that "this is something unprecedented. This is not the Germany we once knew. This is not the even Angela Merkel we once knew when she was elected.”
Sandell said many of Merkel’s telephone calls took place to European leaders in April when “many of the nations were seriously considering moving their embassies.”
Sandell said Merkel’s anti-Israel moves have to do with the Iran nuclear deal, which “has been very much supported by Germany [and] the German government.”
How the IHRA's anti-Semitism definition is a threat to British democracy
The IHRA definition is yet another tool in the arsenal of Israel’s far-right government and the UK Israel lobby to destroy any possibility of developing an independent approach to Israel-Palestine
The underlying claim is that when Jews want to define Antisemitism, it is really nothing more than an attempt to undermine criticism of Israel.
And now, a similar kind of muzzling of Jewish opinion took place just the other day -- this time affecting how Jews talk about their own holidays.
Coveney questions the Peace Initiative itself ("U say u are working on a New Peace Initiative") and finishes off claiming that this is just one more in a series of "unhelpful statements."
But still: Jews describing Jewish holidays is provocative when they are tied to the history of the Jewish people and how they have fought for their lives -- and their land.
During Hanukkah, the Jewish connection to the Temple Mount and Jerusalem is more blatant, but even holidays like Passover, Shavuot, Rosh HaShannah, Yom Kippur, Sukkot and Shemini Atzeret remind us of Jewish Jerusalem -- if for no other reason than the prayers that recall the sacrifices that were brought to the Temple in Jerusalem.
The same goes for Tisha B'Av and other fast days that commemorate the destruction of the Temple.
Likewise, even in during the holiday of Purim, which did not even take place in Israel, the status of which day the Megillah is read is dictated on whether the city was a walled city when Joshua conquered the land -- and the only city that fulfills that requirement today is Jerusalem.
So while the world has no problem remaining quiet while Palestinian Arab leaders deny the historical bond between Jews and Jerusalem, when Jews openly celebrate their holidays and their ties to Jerusalem and the Temple Mount, we are the ones being provocative.
As usual.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
After seeing the recent self-serving "apologies" for offending Jews offered by Linda Sarsour and Marc Lamont Hill, it is (almost) refreshing to see what looks far more like a real apology for antisemitism.
Last week I reported on an absurd antisemitic conspiracy theory published by a Canadian Arabic newspaper that claimed that the building of the Titanic was a Freemason/Jewish conspiracy to force three bankers who opposed the Federal Reserve to be killed on its maiden voyage.
I noted that the editor in chief of the newspaper was running for office, and a Canadian journalist made inquiries about the article, prompting the editor to issue this apology:
Important Message to Readers From Medhat Oweida, Editor-in-Chief
Late last night it was brought to my attention that an article was submitted on our online newspaper whose content was offensive and anti-Semitic. The article in question was published on November 11, 2018 by the editor who oversaw the submission process for incoming contributions to the website.
As the editor-in-chief, I would typically be involved in the approval process of any submissions. However, since October 1st, I had delegated this responsibility as I was focused on seeking the CPC Nomination in the federal riding of Mississauga-Streetsville.
I would like to make the following clear:
I do not share the views of the author of the article in question, and I categorically condemn views which spreads hate directed toward any group.
Once I learned of the existence of the article, I took immediate action to have it removed from the website.
The author of the article has been banned from accessing the website.
We immediately parted ways with the editor who permitted the publication of the article. We are conducting a thorough search of the archives for any other submissions by the same author to ensure removal and to declare we have no association.
We commit to work to improve the submission process to prevent such events from occurring in the future.
As a human rights activist, I spent most my life fighting hatred around the world. As a Canadian Egyptian writer, I have been a proponent of peace between Egypt and Israel and have written articles in support of the peaceful solution of the Israeli-Arab conflict.
In addition, I stand against terrorism and the hate attached to such activities. Part of this fight against extremism is standing for the rights of those who face persecution around the world, in particular members of different minorities, such as the Coptic community in Egypt, Christians in Iraq, Syria and Pakistan, and the Jewish community in the Middle East at large.
I deeply regret the offence caused as a result of the publishing of this article. Please be assured it does not reflect my beliefs and I am confident that it will not be repeated in our publication.
This is a real, well written and authentic-sounding apology, complete with concrete actions to ensure that it doesn't happen again. Firing the editor that allowed the publication is an especially bold and appreciated move. There is no justification in this apology at all for what happened, no equivocation, no excuses.
There is only one problem, though: The offensive article was written in Arabic, but the apology is only written in English.
It seems to me that Medhat should also write an article in Arabic for the Arabic-language readers of his news site - many of whom live in Egypt and other north African countries. Medhat is doing everything he can to ensure that his political career is not hurt by this incident, but if he really cared about human rights and was really against antisemtism as he claims, shouldn't he write an article denouncing antisemitism in Arabic for his Arabic readers?
Antisemitism is rife in the Arab world. Medhat knows this. If he really wanted to contribute to human rights and peace, he would be fighting antisemitism not only in Canada but also where many of his readers are in Egypt and other Arab countries. If he would have translated his apology to Arabic, then that would have shown without a doubt that his apology was sincere. Unfortunately, his failure to do so makes this apology - as well done and as welcome as it is - appear to be political rather than heartfelt.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israelمقالات مشابهة
As Jews celebrated the second night of Chanukah at the Western Wall, Arabic language sites continue to report about in in a way meant to incite Arabs to attack Jews.
A few members of the extremist Jewish "temple" groups gathered yesterday evening for prayer, dancing at the door of the tribes, and lit the candlestick of the Hanukkah festival celebrated by the Jews .
The celebrants also drank alcohol at the thresholds of the Al-Aqsa Mosque, a provocation to the feelings of Palestinian Muslims and Christians, and prayed prayers hoping to rebuild the temple again .
On Tuesday, Jewish extremists are expected to continue prayers at the gates of the Al-Aqsa Mosque, which they pledged at the start of their provocative prayers.
I believe that the reference to the "door of the tribes" was a celebration at the "little Kotel," the Kotel HaKatan north of the popular Western Wall.
But it is reference to drinking wine at the "thresholds of Al Aqsa Mosque" and praying for the Temple to be rebuilt that is meant to start anti-Jewish riots in the streets.
Because there are wine and prayers to rebuild the Temple in every synagogue every week of the year. There is obviously nothing "provocative" about it. Jewish prayers and rituals are much older than Islam is.
(It is also instructive that the article in Masrawy, an Egyptian paper, says that Arab Christians are also "provoked" by Jews drinking wine. Wine is forbidden under Islam but not Christianity, but Arab Muslims are certain that their fellow Christian Arabs will remain in lockstep in their hate of Jews and Israel.)
Jewish fanatics led by Israeli member of parliament Yehuda Klick intensified on Monday provocative tours of Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem, Islam’s third holiest site, as they marked the start of the Jewish lights holiday, Hanouka, according to Muslim officials.
They said groups of 40 Jewish fanatics each were allowed by Israeli police into the Muslim compound since the start of the morning visit hours for non-Muslims.
The extremist groups have encouraged their members to ascend to the Mosque during this holiday, as they do in every other Jewish holiday, in order to assert their presence with a goal to one day take it over and turn it into a Jewish temple.
Palestinian and Muslim officials have warned of outbreak of a religious strife if any changes are introduced to the Muslim holy compound.
This is all pure, official incitement to violence, because the entire story is Jews peacefully visiting the site during the very limited number of visiting hours available to non-Muslims that happen every day except Friday and Saturdays.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
On Hanukkah eve, I tweeted out a somewhat reductionist thought commemorating the bloody Maccabean rebellion against the Seleucid Empire and their traitorous Hellenized Jewish accomplices. It seemed to upset some of my followers.
Why are you politicizing such a pleasant holiday? Does wishing someone a “Merry Christmas” now mean that you accept Jesus as your lord and savior?
Well, first of all, the story of Hanukkah isn’t pleasant. Violent, brutal, and passionate, maybe. But not pleasant. And of course wishing someone a “Happy Hanukkah” isn’t an endorsement of any theological position, any more than wishing someone Merry Christmas is (although we appreciate the recognition of the Jewish presence in ancient Bethlehem). Mostly it’s convention and good manners. Thank you.
Fact is, there isn’t a ton of theology to worry about. Hanukkah is not a Jewish “yom tov,” which in the literal translation means “good day” but in religious terms means the holiday was not handed to the Jewish people through the Torah. Unlike Passover or Yom Kippur, there are no restrictions on work. The two books that deal with the Maccabees aren’t Jewish canon. The “miracle of the lights” — which you might be led to believe is the entire story of the holiday — is apocryphal and was added hundreds of years later in the Talmud.
But whatever reasons you have for offering good wishes, Hanukkah itself is a reminder that Jews have a singular, millennia-long historic relationship with Jerusalem. By the time Mattathias rebelled against Hellenistic Syrian king Antiochus, who had not only ordered a statue of Zeus to be erected in the Holy Temple but that swine be sacrificed to him, Jerusalem had likely been a Jewish city for more than 1,000 years. As some readers have suggested, Hanukkah might be the only Jewish holiday that celebrates events confirmed by the historical record. The Hasmonean dynasty, founded by Mattathias’ son Simon, is a fact.
.@jeremycorbyn hasn't found the time to deal with the antisemitism in his party.
But he found the time to send the Jewish community the WEIRDEST Hanukkah message ever.
The newspapers in Mandate Palestine reported in the editions of December 1, 1947 that the previous evening Arabs had attacked Jews, shooting and killing and injuring them.
In Jerusalem, as Davar reported, at 8:45 PM, nurses being transported to Hadassah Hospital on Mount Scopus were shot at while driving through the Nashashibi neighborhood:
The bus was riddled with eight bullets. The Nashashibi neighborhood is today's Sheikh Jarrah. The first Nashashibi clan house was built where now the Ambassador Hotel stands. They were driving along the road that later would be the site of the Hadassah Convoy Massacre, now called Derech Har HaZeitim*.
The Palestine Post reports, it would seem, an additional incident in Jerusalem as well as the major terror attack on Tel Aviv's border with Jaffa:
The governing body for international chess confirmed Monday that an upcoming tournament that was to be held for the second year in Saudi Arabia has been relocated to Russia because of the kingdom’s policies, which exclude some eligible players.
Two Israeli chess players had appealed to the FIDE chess federation over concerns they would be prevented from playing at the World Rapid and Blitz tournament, as they were last year when Saudi authorities refused to grant them visas to enter the kingdom.
“The Championships were moved from Saudi Arabia to Russia due to the policy adopted by Saudi organizers,” FIDE director general Emil Sutovsky told The Times of Israel in an email.
Although Sutovsky did not specify the block against Israeli players in particular, the decision to move the event came after Israeli chess grandmaster Ilya Smirin and chess organizer Lior Aizenberg sent a letter to FIDE in November demanding that it take action to preserve their right to participate in the federation contest.
The letter was sent with the assistance of the Lawfare Project, a nonprofit organization that says it seeks to protect the civil and human rights of Jewish people around the world.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
Scorpion by Nature: PTSD and other labels What do a tattoo artist, an IDF wounded warrior and a scorpion have in
common? by Forest Rain www.inspirationfromzion.com
Brilliant blue eyes
and smile lines etched in his face could not diminish the horror of the event
he was describing. Possibly it was this inherent charm, his almost apologetic
leaning towards me as he spoke, as if subconsciously pleading for
understanding, that evoked in me an intense reaction to what he described so
calmly:
“It was in 2000. On
the way home from the army, the car I was in was ambushed by terrorists. The
soldier next to me was shot. I was shot too. I got out, returned fire and
killed two terrorists. We drove off but they had already spread the news and
before we got much further a lynch mob was waiting for us. I was shot again, in
the chest. I killed two more terrorists and then we got away. They told me
later I had been mortally wounded.”
Ambushed. Shot
twice. Surviving the first ambush only to end up in a much worse situation.
Battling for his life. Struggling to protect himself and the other passengers
in the car while he was bleeding out. How is it possible to do something so
amazing?!
A man like Yossi
would probably answer: “How is it possible not to? What other choice did I
have? Death by lynch mob is much worse than death by bullets and there were
other people with me.”
I say probably
because I didn’t ask. That’s just what people like Yossi say.
I have lived in Israel
long enough to learn that no real hero will call himself a hero or be
comfortable with other people giving him that title. He will tell you about the
people he didn’t save. He will tell you about others who deserve grand titles
more than he does. He will tell you he did his best, that he wishes he could
have done better. That he just did what needed to be done.
“Just.” Such a small
word…
What comes to mind
when you hear the term “hero”? Do you think of a Superman, a comic-book
superhero? Someone with big muscles and a loud voice? Strong and self-assured?
How would you label
someone like Yossi?
For many it is
difficult to understand that the scars left by bullet holes that almost killed
you can be negligible compared to the trenches extreme trauma can dig into your
psyche. Physical wounds usually heal. It is the wounds of the soul that cause
the worst damage.
Quietly, not
searching for sympathy, just as an explanation, Yossi told me that because of
his PTSD he cannot work indoors, in a typical job so he works outside, in
construction, volunteering to help others who are suffering. When he was
injured, after the physical wounds healed, there was no one who could really
help him with the emotional burden. Now he helps other soldiers who have been
through traumatic experiences.
Who would ever
imagine that it would be a tattoo artist from South Africa who would step up to
help Yossi?
Nicholas Mudskipper
is a nice guy.
Nick came to Israel as part of a group of
tattoo artists of an international caliber participating in a unique program
called Healing Ink. The goal of the program is to utilize the art of tattooing
to bring psychological and emotional support to people suffering from trauma
and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The tattoo serves as a type of
talisman for the recipient, a permanent piece of artwork to transform an ugly
experience of violence and hate into a conscious choice of beauty. The act of
choosing the tattoo empowers the recipient who did not choose to experience the
traumatic event. Sometimes recipients choose tattoos that covers physicals
scars, incorporating them into the art created. Others choose symbols of things
they need to be reminded of when the darkness of remembered trauma overwhelms
them, a kind of light to hold on to when everything else seems too
overwhelming.
Historically Jews
have an aversion to tattoos – due to the practice being explicitly forbidden in
the Torah and the more recent memory of our parents and grandparents being
forcibly tattooed with dehumanizing numbers by Nazis. Today the practice is
becoming more socially acceptable in Israel. Heavily tattooed people are not
common in Israel but people who have one or two tattoos are no longer a rarity.
In Israel, seeing
someone like Nick, covered as he is in tattoos, is unusual. The question is,
would you stop to talk to him and learn about his art or would the tattoos on
his arms (and legs) distract you? Would you see the man or the paintings on his
skin?
To me it seems that
most tattoo artists must reject labels. It takes guts to decorate your skin
with permanent art and disregard what others might think as a result.
Coming from South
Africa to Israel, to help IDF wounded warriors must not have been an easy
thing. I can’t imagine that in the country that would rather go without water
than accept
Israeli technology that would solve the crisis, many would find the
concept of offering support to one of our soldiers acceptable.
But Nick didn’t see
the labels so many others put on Israelis. He saw people, individuals he could
help, just by being himself, doing what he does best. This wasn’t about
supporting a political cause or a “side”, this was about recognizing human pain
and using art to minimize suffering.
Like I said, Nick is
a nice guy.
Most people find it
difficult to understand
PTSD. Often negative or traumatic experiences are conflated with
PTSD. This is similar to people saying: “I forgot where I put my keys, I must
have Alzheimer’s Disease!” Many people have had traumatic experiences. These
leave a residue of negative memory. This is nothing like PTSD that repeatedly
pulls the sufferer back into the horror in a full sensory experience that is
not a memory but the experience relived. Over and over and over. (Read this
to get a better understanding of PTSD).
One of the biggest
challenges for someone suffering from PTSD is recreating their relationship
with the label: “normal”. Imagine yourself in Yossi’s shoes. Would you ever be
able to shake the fear of being trapped in a situation that could kill you? Can
you imagine doing something normal like getting in a car to drive home? What
would it be like to suddenly be caught in a traffic jam, cars piling up and no
way to get out?
Interestingly it was
Nick’s open mind and heart that brought normality to Yossi. For the time they
spent together, Yossi wasn’t a label: IDF soldier, hero, injured, PTSD… he was
just a guy.
They discovered that
both were interested in the same sports. Both are MMA fighters and do similar
workout routines. That was enough to create an instant connection. It was easy
to overcome the differences in language and life experiences because they
weren’t divided by labels.
It was the scorpion
that threw me for a loop. I watched Nick and Yossi excitedly discuss the story
they were both familiar with about the scorpion and the frog:
A scorpion and a
frog meet on the bank of a stream and the scorpion asks the frog to carry him
across on its back. The frog asks, "How do I know you won't sting
me?" The scorpion says, "Because if I do, I will die too."
The frog is
satisfied, and they set out, but in midstream, the scorpion stings the frog.
The frog feels the onset of paralysis and starts to sink, knowing they both
will drown, but has just enough time to gasp "Why?"
Replies the
scorpion: "It’s my nature..."
Yossi wanted Nick to tattoo a big
scorpion on his back, next to the scars left from the bullet holes. At first
the choice seemed incomprehensible. Why would Yossi want to brand himself with
the scorpion that stings even when he knows it will kill himself? Why did Nick
feel this was a cool and positive choice to make? What was I missing?
When I came back at
the end of the session and saw the final tattoo, it’s meaning began to dawn on
me.
Yossi straightened
himself, to stand proud, his body no longer apologetic. The scars are still
visible but it is the scorpion that draws the eye – his choice, not what was
inflicted on him.
The scorpion is
dangerous, it stings, it can kill. Knowing this, Yossi chose to put that on his
back. He did not choose the ambush. He did not choose the PTSD that changed his
life forever. His desire to carry the scorpion on his back is an acceptance of
his “new normal” and a bold statement of power and freedom.
It is a declaration
that being fully aware of the difficult, harsh and sometimes damaging nature of
this new normal, he is strong enough to carry it.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For 20 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.
June 2025
-
June 1, JPost: BBC bans Gaza freelancer who describes Jews as ‘devils’ The
BBC has banned a Gaza reporter who described Jews as “devils,”...
The post Jun...
June 2025
-
June 1, JPost: BBC bans Gaza freelancer who describes Jews as ‘devils’ The
BBC has banned a Gaza reporter who described Jews as “devils,”...
The post Jun...
Concertgoers Cheer Muslim Terrorists Killing Them
-
On Nov 13, 2015, Muslim terrorists attacked a concert at the Bataclan
theater in Paris, opening fire on the crowd while shouting, “Allah Akbar.”
The Mu...
July 4th 1976, Happy Entebbe Day!
-
Dry Bones Golden Oldies in the fond memory of Yaakov Kirschen (Dry Bones)
by Sali, Happy Entebbe Day! July 4th 1976
and Happy Independence Day to Ameri...
The NUJ is hostile to Jewish journalists
-
For several years I had a press card to provide a layer of security while
covering hostile street protests. My recent experience with the National
Union ...
One Choice: Fight to Win
-
Yesterday Israel preempted a potentially disastrous attack by Hezbollah on
the center of the country. Thirty minutes before launch time, our aircraft
destr...
Closing Jews Down Under Website
-
With a heavyish heart I am closing down the website after ten years.
It is and it isn’t an easy decision after 10 years of constant work. The
past...
‘Test & Trace’ is a mirage
-
Lockdown II thoughts: Day 1 Opposition politicians have been banging on
about the need for a ‘working’ Test & Trace system even more loudly than
the govern...
Tuesday, December 04, 2018
Elder of Ziyon
