Showing posts with label boycott. Show all posts
Showing posts with label boycott. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 10, 2025


Disclaimer: the views expressed here are solely those of the author, weekly Judean Rose columnist Varda Meyers Epstein.


Dear Mr. Simon,

When I read that you’d signed a letter calling for the release of Marwan Barghouti, I wouldn’t say I was devastated. Just deeply sad that I would now have to consign your music to the “do not listen to antisemites” discard pile. That pile includes such luminaries as Massive Attack, whose “Teardrop” was the theme song for the House MD series — a ringtone I removed the moment I saw they had signed on to “No Music for Genocide.”

Carole King joined that same campaign, which involved pressuring major labels to boycott Israeli platforms, at which point I realized that when she sang, “You’ve Got a Friend,” she didn’t mean me. Because I live in Israel. She doesn’t like that.

By the same token, I have sent Susan Sarandon, Cate Blanchett, and Ben Affleck to the “do not watch antisemites on the silver screen” garbage heap. At this point, I refuse to watch anything on Netflix before checking the entire cast list against the Film Workers for Palestine pledge. I’ve got that pledge bookmarked for convenience. (The Big C has Cynthia Nixon and Idris Elba in it? Nope, not watching it.)

But you, Mr. Simon — I didn’t imagine you would sign a letter calling for the release of a mass murderer from prison. A man who ordered the murder of Jews for no other reason than that they were Jews. And of course, Barghouti didn’t only murder Jews. He was also responsible for the killing of Father Georgios Tsibouktzakis, a Greek Orthodox monk-priest shot in his car on the way back to his monastery because terrorists assumed — based on his Israeli license plate — that he was a Jew. In other words, he was murdered not because he was a Jew, but because he was thought to be one.

So now I will no longer be listening to Diamonds on the Soles of Her Shoes, because the singer-songwriter who created that musical masterpiece supports the release of a mass murderer — a man convicted on five counts of murder for attacks orchestrated by the networks under his control. Attacks that targeted Jews. Jews like you, Mr. Simon.

Marwan Barghouti built his reputation on directing the gunmen and bombers who left Israelis dead in buses, cafés, and on the roadside. This is the man you’re calling on us to release.

He wouldn’t care that you’re not Israeli or a member of the IDF. He wouldn’t care about your one-in-a-million gift for music. He would only care that you are a Jew. And that is all Barghouti would care about if he were released from prison: murdering innocent Jewish civilians. Violently.

As head of the Fatah supreme committee in the West Bank and leader of the military wing of the Al-Aqsa Brigades, Barghouti had the power to order his men to kill Jews. Jews like 45-year-old mother-of-two Yoella Hen, murdered while filling her gas tank on the way to a family wedding — murdered on the order of Marwan Barghouti, for whose release you, Mr. Simon, are calling.

Barghouti also supplied weapons to the men who killed Yosef Habibi and Eli Dahan as they were dining at a popular Tel Aviv café. The terrorist lobbed grenades into the crowd, opened fire, and when his rifle jammed, rushed inside stabbing anyone he could reach. Habibi and Dahan were murdered. Habibi’s wife Haya was critically injured. A Druze policeman, Sergeant Salim Barakat, ran to help and was stabbed to death as he bent over the terrorist’s body.

Barghouti was also responsible for the shooting attack at a bar mitzvah celebration held at a Hadera banquet hall — six murdered, 26 wounded. He directed the shooting spree on Jaffa Road in Jerusalem in which two Israelis were killed and 37 wounded. He masterminded a shooting attack in the residential Jerusalem neighborhood of Neve Yaakov, where a young policewoman was killed and nine Israelis were wounded. A worker at a coffee factory in the Atarot industrial zone was murdered by a terrorist who acted on Barghouti’s orders.

In the end, Barghouti was convicted on five counts of murder. Which is why he is serving five consecutive life terms plus 40 years. Which is also why he is very popular among Palestinians — they would love to see this Jew-killer step into Mahmoud Abbas’s shoes, now in the twentieth year of his four-year term

Mr. Simon, I know I shouldn’t be surprised you threw your support behind a murderer — all the cool kids are doing it. But somehow I thought someone as obviously brilliant as yourself knew better than to listen to the lies about Barghouti’s victimhood. That you would know enough to look into the matter and find out why Barghouti is really in prison. Not because Israel is persecuting him, but because he is a stone-cold killer.


But as it turns out, I shouldn’t have been surprised for a different reason. Something I hadn’t known. Rafael Medoff filled in the blank: years ago, you wrote The Capeman, a Broadway musical about Salvador Agron — a gang member who stabbed two teenage boys to death on a New York playground. You recast him as a troubled outsider shaped by poverty and street culture.

And now here you are again, extending the same sympathy to Marwan Barghouti. Only Barghouti’s “environment” is something else entirely.

Jew-hatred permeates the PA’s curriculum, its summer camps, its official media, and the speeches of its political leaders (though only when speechifying in Arabic, naturally). Even the sermons of imams praise those who murder Jews, describing them as pigs and monkeys — just as the Nazis saw Jews as cockroaches and rats.

When I heard you had joined the call for an arch-Jew-murderer to be released into the general Israeli population, I thought: He’s misinformed. They’re telling him lies, and the lies are so pervasive that no one bothers to check.

I hoped you were one of the rare birds — someone with enough intellectual curiosity to look into the real story of the war in Gaza. Why it happened and why it didn’t. The war did not happen because Israel wanted to wipe out the Gazan people. The war happened because of October 7 — because of the rape of little girls, the burning of babies, the slaughter of families. Civilians in Gaza cheered and filmed as hostages were dragged through the streets. Ordinary Gazans held hostages in their homes.

Hamas has ruled Gaza exactly as it promised it would. It hijacked aid, blocked distribution, and seized baby-formula shipments with full awareness of the consequences. They knew infants would die, and they let it happen because the deaths served their narrative.

And yet, instead of looking into any of this, you signed your name to the accusation that your own people are committing genocide — while calling for the release of a man who spent years trying to kill us.

The worst part is that so many of the Jews murdered on October 7 were leftist peaceniks who did everything they could to help the people of Gaza. You would know this, Mr. Simon, if you had bothered to check. If you had bothered to come to Israel, even briefly, to see for yourself, to offer support, to stand with your people in a moment of unimaginable pain.

Instead, you stood with a man who would gladly see you dead.

I even looked for you online, thinking perhaps I could explain all this to you — that you would understand how deeply you’d been deceived. I searched for you on Facebook and X, but you have made yourself unreachable to your own people.

We cannot find you to tell you what you’ve done, the harm you’ve caused, how betrayed we feel.

This letter is all I can do. And you will never read it.

But you have placed yourself in a box now — the box reserved for Jews who turn their backs on their own people. You can leave that box anytime, Mr. Simon. It would be an easy enough thing to do. You can join the side that is just, the side that holds life as its greatest value. Or you can stay where you are and earn a footnote in Jewish history as a man who sided with a murderer.

The choice is yours.



Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon!

"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024)

PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

   
 

 

Thursday, September 28, 2023




From the Siasat Daily:

In solidarity with Palestinians and rejection of normalization with Israel, Syrian boxer Mohammad Mlaiyes has withdrawn from the Asian Games currently being held in China, due to the presence of Israeli referee.

The 19th Asian Games are currently being held in China.

Mlaiyes was set to face Bahraini counterpart, Danis Latypov in the preliminary round of the men’s over 92-kilogram division of the continental event. The coach, Mohamed Ghosoun, submitted an objection to the referees committee.

The referees committee refused to respond to the Syrian objection. This prompted Mlaiyes not to get in the ring and then withdraw, after which the referee announced the victory of the Bahraini boxer Laptov.

“Syria, its territories, nation and blood are much more precious than any medal or tournament. It is a country of dignity, pride and resistance against the Israeli occupation,” the boxer told reporters.

Other reports say that the referee's name is Naim Ramaj, but according to this boxing site Ramaj lives in Croatia. 

So this entire episode may be an excuse for the Syrian to avoid a fight - and make himself look like a hero.

 



Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

Wednesday, September 06, 2023



The Palestinian Independent Commission for Human Rights just released its report of human rights violations by Palestinian authorities in the West Bank and Gaza in 2022 (it has not yet been released in English.)

Its section on violations against Palestinian human rights activists is summarized:

Concerning human rights defenders, the independent commission said: Human rights defenders are exposed to a number of violations and harassment committed by official bodies or other unofficial parties. It may lead to murder, kidnapping, arrest, torture, threats, harm to the family and defamation. Defenders of women's rights are subjected to various harassments by social movements and religious and political parties, who see their defense of women as a contradiction with religion and in line with the goals of the West and a denial of Arab values, customs and traditions.   
Those stories, about real abuse against real human rights activists, is rarely covered by the media - because it doesn't fit the narrative that Israel is the human rights violator of Palestinians and, of course, also one of the biggest human rights abusers in the world. (Apparently Israel is surrounded by an oasis of liberal progressive protectors of humanity.)

So the reality gets buried in reports no one reads while the media exaggerates and fabricates Israeli crimes. 

There are real Palestinian human rights defenders - and no one hears about them.

But there are also fake human rights defenders that get lot of coverage. Here's a story that is getting play in Arabic news sites today:

Human rights organizations have called for a boycott of Israeli companies specialized in the field of water and agriculture, prior to their participation in the United Nations Climate Summit (COP 28) scheduled for the end of next November in the UAE.

These companies work to improve their image in front of the world in light of their theft of Palestinian rights to water and the destruction of the Palestinian environment through toxic agricultural pesticides.

The companies (Mekorot, Netafim, Haifa Chemicals, and Adama) seek to present themselves during the summit with their ability to achieve sustainable solutions regarding the environment around the world, at a time when these companies steal Palestinian resources and direct them towards illegal Israeli settlements according to international law.

Human rights organizations are working to reveal the true face of these Israeli companies, and to defend Palestinian rights against climate colonialism.   
Notice anything strange?

The stories do not mention a single "human rights" organization that is calling for this boycott.

The only group I can find talking about this is, of course, BDS. They probably pretend to be a human rights organization. Yet it would not be a surprise if HRW or Amnesty indeed does call for a boycott of Israeli companies at COP28. Because "human rights" is now nothing more than a slogan, with no relationship with real human rights. 

And the real contributions that Israeli technology make to help the world conserve water are considered not as important as the political boycott of any Jewish-owned company in the Middle East. 

And real humans will be deprived of water in the name of "human rights."




Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

Wednesday, August 23, 2023




The Jerusalem Post reports:
Lebanon’s National Security Ministry confiscated Israeli goods from store shelves around the country, its National Security Ministry announced, according to Lebanese media reports on Tuesday.

It is unknown how the Israeli goods ended up in commercial centers in Lebanon, as the two countries do not have diplomatic relations and do not engage in trade. 

According to the reports, the Lebanese ministry stated that “relevant parties had been summoned for questioning.”

According to Ynet, among the Israeli goods confiscated in Lebanon were kitchen towels from the Netanya-based home goods company, Golf & Co. as well as sealing strips from PROMAX.

This doesn't come close to capturing the absurdity of Lebanon's zealousness at enforcing Article 285 of the Lebanese penal code which prohibits trade with an enemy state.

Lebanese State Security released this video dramatizing how their strangely masked employees received the information of the dangerous goods, then enter a vehicle while heavily armed, where they race down the streets in order to confiscate the contraband that is, shudder, "MADE IN ISRAEL." 


It is a clown show, yet they are taking this all so seriously. 

The entire country is going to hell, but at least Lebanese citizens can sleep at night knowing that their security forces are protecting them from Zionist kitchen towels. 




Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

Tuesday, August 15, 2023

Today, Amnesty International tweeted this:


Amnesty is saying that banning a movie is a violation of freedom of expression. Amnesty is against all forms of censorship - the allegation that the movie promotes homosexuality does not seem to be the issue at all, just freedom of expression.

However, when Lebanon bans movies for having Israeli actors or producers, Amnesty has not said a word. Isn't that the exact same violation of freedom of expression?

Perhaps not according to Amnesty. Because they do support some boycotts - boycotts against Israel. 

Amnesty says, "Advocating for boycotts, divestment and sanctions is a form of non-violent advocacy and of free expression that must be protected."

BDS advocates boycotting the free speech of Israelis on college campuses, and its boycotters do all they can to get venues outside Israel to cancel any talk by an Israeli. Similarly, they threaten artists not to play in Israel , which is another violation of freedom of expression. 

How, exactly, is Algeria and Kuwait's boycotts of a movie for religious reasons (whether or not their objections are accurate) a violation of free speech, while Israel-haters' boycotts of movies with Israelis are an example of free speech?

In both cases, the boycotters are the ones that are trying to shut down free speech. You cannot have it both ways.  

The analogy isn't perfect - government censorship is different than people deciding to boycott on their own, which of course is their right. But Amnesty has condemned a number of countries for censoring films with LGBTQ themes, and not one word for censoring films with Israeli links. 

They are both equally guilty of violating freedom of expression, but only one upsets Amnesty. 

It sure sounds like Amnesty's concern for freedom of expression only extends to expression that they agree with. 




Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

Tuesday, July 25, 2023



From BNN:
The Iraqi Fencing & Modern Pentathlon Federation recently decided to withdraw its team from the FIE Fencing World Championships in Milan due to a potential confrontation with Israeli players. 

This is not the first time the Iraqi team has made such a decision. The team also withdrew from individual races in a previous World Fencing Championship held in Istanbul for the same reason.

Azhar Ali, the director of the Federation’s media, stated that the team’s withdrawal only applies to confrontations with Israel, and that the Iraqi players would continue to participate in other competitions. Ali also emphasized that the Iraqi Federation would not face any penalties due to the withdrawal, as it is in compliance with international regulations.
That last sentence does not seem to be true.

The official FIE regulations state:

t.113  Refusing to fence an opponent  
1 No fencer (individual or team) from an FIE member national federation may take part in an official competition if he refuses to fence against any other fencer whatsoever (individual or team) correctly entered in the event. Should this rule be broken, the penalties specified for offences of the 4th group will be applied (cf. t.158-162, t.169, t.170). 

Offenses of the 4th group means a black card. 

2 The FIE shall consider whether there are grounds, and to what extent, for taking sanctions against the national federation to which the disqualified competitor belongs (cf. FIE Statutes 1.2.4 and Rules Article t.170).

Any black card awarded at a competition of the FIE or at a competition organized by any Confederation which has subscribed to the FIE disciplinary code shall be reported within 10 days to the President of the FIE, for him to assess whether the severity of the offence committed warrants the sending of the report made by the FIE supervisor or by the Directoire Technique to the president of the Legal Commission, requesting him to establish a Disciplinary Tribunal to determine if penalties in addition to those imposed at the competition should be imposed. 
Given that the Iraqi team did the same thing in Istanbul a couple of months ago, if the FIE has any concern for the sport, it should expel any team that has clearly stated that they refuse to participate in these competitions against legal competitors. 




Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

This week, the American Anthropological Association voted to boycott all Israeli academic institutions

The resolution that they approved is antisemitic. It says that Israel's very existence is "apartheid", not "settlements" or "occupation", saying that "from the onset of the Nakba, the catastrophic events of 1948 that led to the mass expulsion and displacement of Palestinians from their homes, Palestinians—including activists, artists, intellectuals, human rights organizations, and others—have documented and circulated knowledge of the Israeli state’s apartheid system and ethnic cleansing."

The first paragraph of the resolution is all the proof you need that there was no research or academic rigor that went into this decision. 

Whereas, in 2005, 175 Palestinian civil society organizations, including the Palestinian Federation of Unions of University Professors and Employees (PFUUPE), issued a call for boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) against the Israeli state, in support of the Palestinian struggle for human and political rights, including the basic right of freedom;
The very first paragraph invokes the antisemitic BDS movement as justification for the boycott, blindly accepting whatever accusations it makes against Israel. The following paragraphs are all essentially cut and pasted from BDS materials. No one at AAA did any fact checks on the assertions in the rest of the resolution.

But what about the Palestinian Federation of Unions of University Professors and Employees? Their support for a boycott is considered the linchpin from which the entire resolution gets is legitimacy. Who are they?

The PFUUPE does not exist in any real sense.

It has no webpage. It has no Facebook account. It has no Twitter account. 

It does have a phone number, which is also the main phone number of Palestine Polytechnic University and the office number of that university's president, Dr. Amjad Barham  

He is the president of the PFUUPE according to his CV.

Is it not strange that the president of a federation of unions is also the president of a university that those unions would naturally make demands of for better benefits and working conditions? There appears to be a conflict of interest there.

But not if the PFUUPE is fictional. 

There is no evidence that the Palestinian Federation of Unions of University Professors and Employees has a single member outside Dr. Barham. It apparently does not have bylaws, or membership fees, or benefits, or recruitment materials, or a board, or committees, or elections, or a vice president.

It is one person named Amjad, a man who lists being able to use a PC and the Internet on his resume,  and who issues regular press releases in the name of all Palestinian academics. Nearly all of those are about boycotting Israel. He even managed to parlay his one man organization into a Guardian op-ed - again, advocating boycotting Israel, which appears to be the only purpose of this purported federation.

Many other of the "175 Palestinian civil society organizations" that signed the BDS "call" for boycotts appear to be equally fictional, tiny one-person operations created just for the purpose of appearing to be part of a greater whole. Many of them are not even based in the borders of British Mandate Palestine - these "Palestinian civil society" organizations are in Syria and Lebanon and Canada - but they are presented as "Palestinian" to promote the myth that the BDS movement was initiated by Palestinians. 

The American Anthropological Association didn't check out whether the PFUUPE that they refer to in their very first paragraph is a real organization. They have no intellectual honesty at all. And any academic who remains a member of an organization that cannot be trusted to check the facts in its own resolutions is not interested in truth either. 

UPDATE: GnasherJew did find a Facebook page for this union. 



Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

AddToAny

Printfriendly

EoZTV Podcast

Podcast URL

Subscribe in podnovaSubscribe with FeedlyAdd to netvibes
addtomyyahoo4Subscribe with SubToMe

search eoz

comments

Speaking

translate

E-Book

For $18 donation








Sample Text

EoZ's Most Popular Posts in recent years

Search2

Hasbys!

Elder of Ziyon - حـكـيـم صـهـيـون



This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For 20 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.

Donate!

Donate to fight for Israel!

Monthly subscription:
Payment options


One time donation:

Follow EoZ on Twitter!

Interesting Blogs

Blog Archive