"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024) PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022) |
![]() |

"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024) PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022) |
![]() |
Recognising that, since the horrific Hamas-led attack of 7 October 2023, which itself constitutes international crimes, the government of Israel has engaged in systematic and widespread crimes against humanity, war crimes and genocide, including indiscriminate and deliberate attacks against the civilians and civilian infrastructure (hospitals, homes, commercial buildings, etc.) of Gaza, which, according to official UN estimates, at the date of this resolution, has killed more than 59,000 adults and children in Gaza;
This resolution declaring what is happening in Gaza as genocide passed by an overwhelming majority far beyond the two thirds majority required. Our membership is global. We also have members who are from survivor communities, so this is a really representative opinion of people who work as experts in the field of genocide studies.
The @GenocideStudies president claims a resolution that Israel is committing genocide "passed by an overwhelming majority" and is a "really representative opinion" of experts.
— HonestReporting (@HonestReporting) September 2, 2025
It's not. Only 28% of the membership actually voted.
Melanie O'Brien, your resolution is a sham. pic.twitter.com/LL33WH6HcV
Why such sloppy work? Maybe because IAGS isn’t just scholars. As Jewish Insider notes, anyone can join—artists, activists, “others interested in genocide.” In other words: not exactly a panel of legal experts.
This is why the resolution contains a blatant error on international law:
Acknowledging that the International Court of Justice found in three provisional measures order in the case of South Africa v. Israel — January, March, and May 2024 — that it is plausible that Israel is committing genocide in its attack in Gaza and ordered Israel to take all measures within its power to prevent and punish the direct and public incitement of genocide and to ensure the provision of humanitarian assistance to civilians in Gaza;The president of the ICJ has already publicly debunked that claim:
[The ICJ] did not decide--and this is something where I'm correcting what's often said in the media--it didn't decide that the claim of genocide was plausible. It did emphasize in the order that there was a risk of irreparable harm to the Palestinian right to be protected from genocide, but the shorthand that often appears, which is that there's a plausible case of genocide, isn't what the court decided.
The International Association of Genocide Scholars wants the world to believe its resolution reflects a united, scholarly consensus. It doesn’t. The vote was driven by a small, activist minority relying on Hamas-supplied numbers and misrepresenting international law. When an academic body trades rigor for politics, it doesn’t just fail—it erodes trust in the entire field.
And the backlash has already begun. Scholars for Truth about Genocide issued a public letter condemning IAGS and demanding a retraction of what they call a “resolution accusing Israel of genocide amid a clear misapplication of law and history.”
"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024) PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022) |
![]() |
"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024) PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022) |
![]() |
"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024) PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022) |
![]() |
America’s so-called allies – Britain, France, Canada, Australia and others – are about to stab President Donald Trump in the back. The goal is to lay waste to the president’s signature foreign policy success – the Abraham Accords.US-backed Gaza aid group slams Doctors Without Borders, accuses it of spreading 'false' claims
The Abraham Accords denied violent Palestinian rejectionists a veto over the normalization of relations between Arab states and Israel. Now Palestinians and their band of useful idiots have launched a coup. The scheme opens by overthrowing the fundamental principle of a negotiated settlement to the Arab-Israeli conflict. United Arab Emirates officials have speciously started blaming Israel for the Accords’ demise.
The staging ground for this "Et tu, Brute?" moment is the United Nations. French President Emmanuel Macron announced on Sept. 3, 2025, that he, and his Saudi counterpart, have called upon world leaders to assemble at the United Nations in New York City on Sept. 22 and endorse this agenda. Formally, the substance has been committed to paper in what they are outlandishly calling "The New York Declaration."
Trump and Macron
This means that by the time President Trump addresses the General Assembly on the following day, he will have been reduced to the guy with the broom bringing up the rear. His hopes and plans for peace in the Middle East will have already been rejected by virtually every head of state or government in attendance.
The New York Declaration first appeared at the conclusion of a confab, chaired by the French and the Saudis, at the U.N. in July of this year. The United States and Israel stayed away. The vast majority of states ignored State Department pleas to do the same.
The document weighs in at 30 pages of anti-Israel venom and attacks on American foreign affairs. It twists the horrors of Oct. 7, 2023 – when more than 1,400 Jews (and others in Israel) were murdered, raped, tortured and kidnapped – into a political win for Palestinians.
US vetoes anti-Israel UN Security Council resolution Video
Here are just some of the Declaration’s extraordinarily dangerous demands:
A "State of Palestine" before "mutual recognition" of the Jewish state.
A Palestinian "right of return" that would flood Israel with millions of Palestinians from the river to the sea – thus ending the Jewish state.
A fully armed Palestinian state (called a "one state, one gun policy") and an indefensible Jewish state.
An arms embargo on Israel ("ceasing the provision or transfer of Arms") cutting off the country’s ability to defend itself.
A global pogrom to arrest and prosecute Israelis in national and international courts the world over.
Abandoning the hostages and rewarding the kidnappers by conditioning their release on Israel freeing convicted Palestinian criminals and fully withdrawing from Gaza.
And here is what the Declaration does not mention: Jews. Judaism. The Jewish state. Antisemitism – the actual driver of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Even Jerusalem is only discussed in terms of Islamic and Christian rights. Jewish history is nowhere.
The Declaration represents multilateral bullying at its worst. But the United States is not powerless.
Following unrelenting criticism from the United Nations, the U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) is once again being targeted by NGOs, even as it delivered its 155 millionth meal to Gazans on Saturday.Ben-Dror Yemini: As Pro-Palestinian Flotilla Heads to Gaza, Israel Should Counter by Sending Survivors, Hostage Families and Border Residents
Doctors Without Borders, known by its French acronym MSF, has launched ads criticizing GHF. Meta’s Ad Library shows that in August it ran several Facebook ads targeting the foundation. One ad read, "This is not aid. This is orchestrated killing." Another said, "In MSF’s 54 years, rarely have we seen such levels of systemized violence."
Both allegations are taken from an Aug. 6 article on MSF’s website in which General Director Raquel Ayora describes accounts received from patients reportedly injured around GHF sites. Ayora says aid seekers claimed to have witnessed "children shot in the chest while reaching for food. People crushed or suffocated in stampedes. Entire crowds gunned down at distribution points."
GHF spokesperson Chapin Fay called MSF's accusations, "false and disgraceful," saying that it is "amplifying a disinformation campaign orchestrated by the Hamas-linked Gaza Health Ministry. They know better. By repeating these lies, they’re not aiding civilians, they’re aiding Hamas."
"No civilians have ever been shot at any of our distribution sites," Fay told Fox News Digital.
Fay said, "Nearly every day, Nasser Hospital issues false reports to the media of civilians killed near our sites, based solely on testimony from others. Not a single MSF doctor has ever witnessed an incident near our sites. Any conflict between Israel and Hamas, sometimes several kilometers away, the Gaza Health Ministry falsely links to GHF."
In response to questions about whether MSF employees have witnessed injuries or deaths at GHF sites firsthand, a spokesperson told Fox News Digital that, "MSF has documented the impacts of violence and chaos at GHF sites in Gaza, based on firsthand accounts of our personnel and patients at two clinical sites, as well as a body of medical data."
MSF declined to respond to questions about how much money it has spent on ads targeting GHF, or whether it has advocated for medical care for Israeli hostages taken by Hamas.
The MSF spokesperson added, "For the past 22 months, humanitarian organizations working in Gaza and the West Bank have consistently faced baseless and inaccurate smear campaigns."
Though there is growing outcry about purported violence near GHF sites, reporting from the United Nations indicates that there were twice as many deaths surrounding humanitarian aid convoys (576) as there were deaths around GHF sites (259) between July 21 and Aug. 18.
Greetings to all those sailing on the flotilla to Gaza. We are convinced that if you truly knew the reality, the honest among you would join protests against the Islamo-Nazism that threatens you just as much as it threatens us. Hamas broadcasts have aired explicit calls "to kill all Jews and Christians to the last one."
On Hamas's children's television programs, they repeatedly teach - sometimes through a Mickey Mouse lookalike - that their ultimate vision is "the extermination of all Jews." Israel is not committing genocide; Israel is trying to prevent the genocide Hamas openly declares.
Fathi Hammad, a senior Hamas leader, admitted: "We use women and children as human shields." Ismail Haniyeh, Hamas's former leader, said: "We need the blood of women, children and the elderly." These are Hamas's stated policies. Israel regrets deeply that civilians are harmed - but they are harmed because of Hamas, not Israel.
Hamas and other jihadist groups represent Islamist imperialism that murders primarily Muslims who refuse to submit to its rule. Their vision is to impose strict sharia-based laws, which allow the total erasure of basic human rights. They themselves say, "raise the flag of Islam over the Vatican" while destroying Christianity and Christians worldwide. Is that truly the cause you want to help?
Survivors of the Nova music festival massacre, residents from Gaza border communities, families of hostages, and freed hostages should board Israeli boats to meet the flotilla, armed with their personal stories.
The objective of the current study is to understand the impact of positive and negative portrayals of Muslims in entertainment television. Specifically, we examined the effects of exposure to depictions of Muslims in television shows on people’s support for policies that are broadly undemocratic or specifically anti Muslim, attitudes toward Muslims, and perceptions of Muslims.
The research team ran an experiment in which participants were randomly assigned to watch either a positive or negative depiction of Muslims in entertainment media to assess effects on support for various policies, intergroup attitudes toward, and perceptions of Muslims.An episode of 9-1-1: Lone Star (season 1, episode 3) was selected for the positive depiction of Muslims. The episode featured a Muslim woman firefighter who helps save a man trapped in a grain silo and interacts with colleagues and community members to whom she describes her connection to faith and reasoning for wearing hijab. An episode of Criminal Minds (season 2, episode 10) was selected for the negative depiction of Muslims. The episode featured FBI profilers discussing Islam as violent and focuses on a Muslim suspect who is portrayed as being resistant to the FBI profilers and trying to radicalize other prisoners toward militant jihad.
It is unsurprising that people who are exposed to positive messaging end up being more sympathetic in an immediate interview and those who are exposed to negative messaging do the opposite.
What is interesting is that in order to find an appropriate "anti-Muslim" TV episode, they had to go back to 2006, when the "Criminal Minds" episode was aired.Keep in mind that this was only five years after 9/11.
Discussing jihadists on a TV crime show is hardly inappropriate in that (or any other) time - it is a real problem. And from what I can tell, the episode did not generalize the jihadists to all Muslims, and the main investigator told the terrorist " You have perverted your faith to justify killing millions of people."
Should TV reflect the truth, or should it bend over backwards to not offend? The Barney Miller episode was respectful but truthful, and the Criminal Minds episode seems to have been the same way (with the stakes much higher.)
Nevertheless, the fact that the ISPU study couldn't find a more contemporary example of negative portrayal of Muslims on mainstream American TV shows that there is no problem at all. Not that they would admit that - they don't. The entire study implies that negative portrayals of Muslims are prevalent on TV and needs to be fixed.
"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024) PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022) |
![]() |
Hamas waged its surprise attack on Israel, storming across the border on Oct. 7, killing about 1,200 people — most of them civilians, according to the Israeli government — and seizing about 250 others as hostages. Israel then launched its war in Gaza, killing tens of thousands and leaving generations of Palestinians to experience displacement and hunger, and the fear that they would never see their homes again.
The majority of victims of October 7 were civilians - but only if you believe the Israeli government. The New York Times isn't quite sure, you see.
But it is certain who launched the war: Israel. Before that was merely a "surprise attack," completely independent of anything else. There is no "according to Hamas' health ministry" for the "killing tens of thousands" to parallel the caveat for Israeli victims.
The centerpiece of the article, however, is the Abu Samra family of Deir al Balah. Abdulrahim describes how they were fearful when the war began, and many fled to Egypt, paying huge amounts of money to escape. Yet their patriarch, 87-year old Abdallah Abu Samra, was not able to leave, because of some capricious Israeli decision: according to the family, Israel placed a "security block" on him. So he is left in Gaza, homeless with only a few family members, just like he was in 1948.
Awful, isn't it?
Here's a photo of the Abu Samra family home in Deir al Balah from before the war.
What Raja Abdulrahim doesn't mention is that the Abu Samra clan of Deir al Balah has been associated with Hamas and other terror groups for years, which would explain how they could live in such an opulent home.
Meet Qassam Brigades commander Mahmoud Ahmed Abu Samra from Deir al Balah:
Palestine Remembered describes his family as a "good, generous and blessed family that loved resistance." Mahmoud himself participated in a suicide car bomb attack on the humanitarian aid site at Kerem Shalom in April 2008, which injured 13 IDF soldiers.
In 2015, on the eighth anniversary of the attack, Hamas organized a march from a mosque to the Abu Samra home to pay tribute to their "martyr." Here are masked members of the Qassam Brigades together with the Abu Samra children in what is almost certainly the same palatial house that the New York Times showed:
Also from Deir al Balah is Awda Mahmoud Abu Samra, a leader of the Nasser Salah Din Brigades:
He was responsible for a number of rocket attacks on Sderot as well as other attacks, listed here. He was "martyred" in 2005, and his obituary notes that his father was also a terrorist who spent time in Israeli prisons.
But Abu Samra's family association with Hamas didn't end years ago. Asharq al Awsat notes an incident this year where a Hamas policeman shot and killed a child of the Abu Samra family, and they publicly executed the policeman. The article mentions that Israel "killed at least 20 members of the Abu Samra clan during the current war, including activists affiliated with Hamas."
This terrorist family is who the New York Times is framing as tragic victims of another Nakba.
There is no way that Raja Abdulrahim is not aware of the history of the Abu Samra clan. But she sure doesn't want the readers of the New York Times to know any of this.
"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024) PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022) |
![]() |
"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024) PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022) |
![]() |
It has taken until 700 days for Israel to get permissions from families and friends to freely distribute 22 minutes of the 47 minutes of footage that was initially shown to journalists in private screenings following the October 7 massacre. I was one of those journalists. I endured the entire 47 minute screening. I averted my eyes a few times, and just listened to sounds. For the most part, I kept my eyes open, no matter how horrifying, because I needed to bear witness to the atrocities to know that I understand October 7 and that I know why the IDF is in Gaza. I needed to see it all to strengthen my resolve in the face of a two-year-long media onslaught that has since taken place to frame Israel as the aggressor “genocidal” force, when in fact it was Gaza who intended to commit a genocide on that black Shabbat, 700 days ago.Andrew Fox: The insanity of 7th October denial
It must be noted that there is vastly more than 22 - or even 47 - minutes of bodycam and CCTV and cellphone footage. This is a snapshot of what Israel had to face on the day that would never end. On the day that still has yet to end. For us, it is still October 7, 700 days later. We are yet to wake up from the nightmare. If you’re still here reading, thank you. You are one person yet to cave to public pressure, yet to be so gaslit by the narrative that you no longer can see right from wrong and good from evil, yet to vote with your feet and leave the Jews in the darkness alone once more.
700 days. The last 700 days has shown us the truth of the world both outward and inward. A gargantuan test. We are still standing and we keep fighting for the truth and for the 48 hostages - dead and alive - who remain in captivity.
Our adversaries have stopped at nothing, aiding Hamas’s strategy to seduce the world and usher in a feverish call to banish the Jews from public life. The other week I was at coffee with a friend. He said that he heard a one word definition of antisemitism. Impossible, I thought. “Libel”, he said. Wow. That’s it. The world has bathed in it for almost two years following the worst attack on Jews since the Holocaust. Bathed in it like it was a vintage bottle of Dom Perignon. Champagne socialists have turned the word Zionist into a slur and made Jew hatred the socially acceptable form of racism among every class. They have picked their own self-hating Jews to speak to their agenda, turning our own brothers and sisters against us. They have made Israel stand trial for defending her right to exist in the face of a regime that would wipe her off the map and replace her with yet another Arab colonized state: Palestine.
There is a direct line from this video of Hamas atrocities to the hysteria and denial of the pro-Palestine mob. Their need to scream at the top of their voice at the slightest supposed evidence of Israeli “genocide” is a pathetic compensation for the cognitive dissonance 7th October causes them, and their inability to process its sheer scale and horror.
Hamas has to bombard us with some real, some fake, some heavily manipulated snuff clips from Gaza until we go mad. If they didn’t, people would look 7th October and never forgive them. All those screeching hordes would be silenced if they had to watch that video and be honest about it. Hamas’s media campaign from Gaza gives them a get-out-of-jail-free card to carry on, untroubled by the mass rape and the slaughter of Israeli civilians.
The world has to drown out 7th October by heaping opprobrium on Israel as a behemoth of evil. If it didn’t, these people would have to face what happened on 7th October. Even worse, they would have to face their own complicity. Of course the UN is colluding and lying about Gaza, because through UNRWA and other agencies, it helped 7th October happen by at least turning a blind eye, at worst actively enabling it.
Owen Jones is the template; this phenomenon in microcosm. Something in him broke when he saw that video: not just his prejudice about Israel and Palestine but his own belief in humanity. He came out having looked at the Medusa and not having an answer. He has spent nearly two years deflecting 7th October with a mirror of confected outrage, because that video challenged every belief he held about “Palestine”. Accepting the truth would have turned his foolishly-held conviction to stone. Now he spends his days trolling from oCcUpPieD pALesTiNe.
Since witnessing the video, Owen has since invested everything in ignoring and disregarding the atrocity of 7th October, throwing himself into pretending that everything that has come since is far worse, so that he can hide from his own shock, fear and confusion. This is reflected in the madness of the pro-Palestinian mob: they cannot accept that Israelis were ever victims, and so they ignore and deny not only Hamas’s actions on 7th October, but also Hamas’s actions in sacrificing the people of Gaza.
Here is the video in the first reply. I challenge you to make it through more than five minutes.
The resolution’s accusation of genocide by Israel is a baseless fabrication, unsupported by evidence and a shameful misuse of the term “genocide.” The following facts dismantle this fraud:Palestinian statehood recognition now betrays Labour’s better traditions
1. Humanitarian Realities: Gaza’s population has grown since the conflict began. Israel facilitates substantial aid, including increased caloric supplies and polio vaccinations, actions fundamentally incompatible with genocidal intent.
2. Israel’s Civilian Protections: Israel issues evacuation warnings before military operations, a practice antithetical to genocide. Conversely, Hamas, which initiated this war and holds hostages, could end the conflict instantly by releasing them but refuses to negotiate.
3. Fabricated Narratives: Allegations of starvation rely on manipulated images. Active markets and restaurants in Gaza contradict claims of systemic deprivation.
4. Complicity of International Actors: Many humanitarian agencies fail to denounce Hamas’s terrorism or advocate for peace, instead amplifying anti-Israel narratives that perpetuate a cycle of violence for political ends.
Categorical Evidence Against Genocide Accusations: The claim that Israel’s actions constitute genocide is not only false but impossible under the legal and factual circumstances, as demonstrated by the following:
- Absence of Genocidal Intent: Genocide requires specific intent to destroy a group “as such” (1948 Genocide Convention). Israel’s actions target Hamas, a designated terrorist organization, not Palestinians as a group. Military operations focus on combatants, with documented efforts to minimize civilian harm, such as precision strikes and warnings.
- Population Growth and Aid: Gaza’s population has increased, and Israel has facilitated massive humanitarian aid, including 1.5 million tons of supplies since October 2023, contradicting claims of intent to destroy. Conditions of life are not calculated to cause physical destruction but are impacted by Hamas’s diversion of aid.
- Hamas’s Role in Prolonging Conflict: Hamas’s refusal to release hostages and its use of civilian infrastructure for military purposes (e.g., tunnels under hospitals) drives the conflict’s intensity. Israel’s response is a legitimate act of self-defense, not a genocidal campaign.
By being deliberately deceived into endorsing this propaganda, IAGS has abandoned its scholarly mission and become an active combatant in the information war. A small faction of activists has manipulated the organization, exploiting its pay-to-join structure to push a false narrative. The consequences are catastrophic: IAGS has destroyed its own credibility, reduced itself to an absurdity, and disgraced the field of genocide studies.
I demand the immediate retraction of this fraudulent resolution and the expulsion of every signatory who endorsed it. These individuals, having exploited a vulnerable organization for propaganda, must be held accountable for this academic travesty. The damage to IAGS’s reputation and the broader field of genocide studies is profound and irreparable.
The Labour Party has a complex history with Israel. The post-war Labour government neither intended to recognise the Jewish state nor support its UN membership, abstaining from the UN Partition vote in 1947. Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin told his US counterpart that Britain was “unanimous” in opposing a Jewish state, calling the Balfour Declaration an “unfortunate error.”Lammy replaced by Cooper as Foreign Secretary
After the vote, Bevin condemned President Truman’s recognition of Israel, insisting borders not be recognised and the arms embargo maintained. Labour systematically tried to sabotage the UN Partition Resolution, such as offering “wholehearted support” for the Bernadotte Plan, which would have removed 60% of the Jewish state. They were among the few to abstain from the 1949 vote admitting Israel to the UN.
Yet Labour giants like Nye Bevan and Richard Crossman celebrated the new state. Harold Wilson, the only modern prime minister to win four general elections, continued this legacy throughout the 1960s and 70s, expressing reverence for “social democrats who made the desert flower.”
However, Soviet bloc support for Israel reversed from the late 1960s, with extreme anti-Zionist propaganda infecting the far-left, including then-outsiders Jeremy Corbyn and George Galloway.
Tony Blair’s leadership saw Labour reaffirm close ties with Israel as a fellow democracy surrounded by hostile actors, clinging to liberal values in an anti-democratic region plagued by extremism.
Today, Starmer’s Labour holds little influence with Israel. Foreign Minister David Lammy allegedly couldn’t secure a meeting with the Israeli Prime Minister during his visit. When two Labour MPs were barred from Israel for calling for sanctions, 70 colleagues were reduced to a protest photoshoot.
After hostile diplomatic gestures, Sir Keir dramatically announced UK recognition of a Palestinian state — presumably for cynical electoral reasons, after feeling squeezed by vocal anti-Israel backbenchers and independents who make Gaza their core policy offering.
But pandering to extremists for whom Labour can never be extreme enough is unacceptable when voices of reason are so desperately needed. The government cannot explain the borders it will recognise and has no clear idea how the Palestinian Authority can exercise governance. It seemingly hasn’t noticed that the PA relies on aid, is deeply unpopular, corrupt, has lost control of West Bank areas to Iran-backed terror groups, pays salaries to convicted terrorists, and glorifies violence and racism to children.
David Lammy has been replaced as Foreign Secretary by former Home Secretary Yvette Cooper in a major cabinet reshuffle.
In another surprise move Shabana Mahmood becomes the new Home Secretary.
Tottenham MP Lammy – who has been a divisive figure within the community for his stance on the conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, and moves to recognise a Palestinian state – has been appointed Justice Secretary and Deputy Prime Minister.
In her role Home Secretary Cooper had proscribed the Palestine Action group, and had worked with police chief over incidents of antisemitism at pro-Palestine demos.
Yvette Cooper, Home Secretary, CST Fundraising Dinner 2025. (C) Blake Ezra Photography
She has also been a regularly attendee at the Community Security Trust’s annual dinners, along with her husband Ed Balls.
Lammy had been scheduled to fly out to the Gulf imminently to meet senior officials in the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia over the next few days to try to build a consensus around a framework for lasting peace in the region.
His role as Deputy PM will still offer Lammy the chance to use his diplomatic skills.
Cooper will now also be handed a central role over the imminent move by the UK to recognise a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly on September 23.
But Cooper has received criticism of the failure to get a grip on the small boats crisis.
It seems important that Trump and Netanyahu’s campaign of purposeful misdirection preceding the Iran strikes was designed to fool not only the Iranians and their U.S. allies throughout media, academia, and the think-tank world, but also MAGA influencers who opposed military action to end Iran’s nuclear program. So long as they thought they’d boxed Trump in, outing a plot to stop Iran and its proxies that was contrived by a “neocon” cabal inside the administration that was destined to fail, these influencers favored the president they deemed vulnerable to their threats as well as their blandishments. After all, what was Trump without them?Hold Jordan accountable: Extradite Sbarro terrorist Ahlam Tamimi
Thus, Bannon must have been confident he’d be able to talk sense into Trump and dissuade him from striking Iran when the president invited him to the White House for lunch as doomsday for Iran’s nuclear program approached. Because Bannon’s echo chamber celebrated him as a savior, and because the anti-Trump schemers inside MAGA can’t fathom the thought that they’re utterly irrelevant without Trump, he was unprepared to find that Trump had used him as a decoy. Thus, after the president joined Israel’s efforts against Iran, Bannon, Carlson, and the rest were in open rebellion against Trump. The only other place on the board they could move to was Obama.
The MAGA cohort voicing its contempt for Israel and pro-Israel activists—and loathing for the Israeli leader with whom Trump has made a historic alliance—characterizes its stance by drawing on historical Republican models such as Buchanan. They’re not left-wingers, no; rather, according to them, they’re Buchananites.
The problem is that Pat Buchanan, who expressed his disdain for Israel supporters among the representatives of the U.S. public by labeling them Israel’s “amen corner” in Congress, was a presidential speechwriter and later a third-party presidential candidate. He never implemented policy because he wasn’t the president and never got close to being president. The president who implemented a policy to replace Israel and the Jews with the negation of Israel and the Jews is Obama. On the other side is Trump. In that framework, it’s clear that the aim of the nominally pro-Trump figures attacking the U.S.-Israel alliance is to complete Obama’s project and sever the United States from Israel and cut us off from our history.
Bannon is zeroing in on the strategic aspect of the U.S.-Israel relationship by claiming that Netanyahu is corrupt and Israel is weak and worthless as an ally. Israel is a protectorate, says Bannon. The Jews needed Trump to finish the job in Iran, and now they’re trying to drag America into a regime-change war. To help sell his case, Bannon draws on Obama partners such as Iran lobbyist Trita Parsi, a chief spokesman for the Iran nuclear deal.
Carlson, on the other hand, is focused on the American majority. Obama went after the Jews, but for Carlson, it’s Christians, in particular evangelicals, the bedrock of pro-Israel America. It seems that his slate of shows on religious or spiritual topics is purposed to build an evangelical audience—a potentially self-defeating endeavor, since selling despair, sowing confusion, and peddling lies about the Jews while comforting their hunters may give evidence to believers that a man who claims to have been attacked by demons lost that skirmish.
The more practical problem is that evangelicals understand not only scripture but also American history better than Carlson and his guests do. Americans’ love of Israel didn’t start at the dawn of the 20th century, thanks to a best-selling Bible commentary; rather, it’s contemporaneous with our founding. That is, the small upstate New York town founded in 1714, for instance, was named Goshen not because of the 1902 Scofield Bible, but because our forefathers believed that the American project is rooted in the history, faith, and trials of the Jews.
Replacing Israel and the Jews with the negation of Israel and the Jews means not only undermining our historical and cultural foundations but also exposing our constitutional republic to extinction-level danger. A Palestinian Youth Movement conference last week in Dearborn, Michigan, gave evidence of what happens when the enemies of the Jews are raised to pride of place: threats of assassinating pro-Israel officials and disrupting American supply lines and commerce, all in the name of anti-Zionist resistance.
Even before Biden collapsed our borders, we lost thousands of miles from our eastern-most frontier, Europe; the continent is on the verge of collapse under the weight of foreign populations whose values and ideas are incommensurate with the civilization the West built on the foundations laid long ago in Jerusalem. Our flank is increasingly exposed because we have no other ally who can or wants to fight to preserve our past and ensure our future. It’s the United States and Israel alone. Thus, the choice for us is stark: America or the hellfire, Trump or Obama.
There have been some indications of American pressure on Jordan of late. On Oct. 1, 2020, for instance, Tamimi’s husband, Nizar Tamimi, was forced to leave the country after Jordan refused to renew his residency permit. He currently resides in Qatar.Trump signs order that punishes those who detain Americans illegally
Earlier this summer, the Trump administration was asked about Tamimi during a State Department Press Briefing as a reporter questioned what was “preventing” U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio from pushing the Jordanians to enforce Tamimi’s extradition. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce promised to get more information.
The issue was raised two days later at another State Department press briefing. This time, the question was tied to President Trump’s Day One executive order declaring that America and its citizens come first.
Noting that Jordan receives more than a billion dollars in aid each here, the reporter asked a State Department spokesperson. “How is it conceivable that Tamimi is still there, and any of that falls under these dictates of what American foreign policy is supposed to be, with three dead Americans at Tamimi’s hands? … the U.S. failure to turn the screws on Jordan is a violation of Trump’s promise that ‘the foreign policy of the United States shall champion core American interests and always put America and American citizens first.’”
This time, it was deputy spokesperson Thomas Pigott who proved a tepid response, saying the United States “has continually emphasized” to Jordan that Tamimi has to be held accountable, and that the United States “continues to impress” upon them that she should be brought to justice. This response, however, likely fell far short of the kind of pressure the reporter was asking about.
But it does seem that some more concrete steps to extradite Tamimi are being taken.
On July 17, the Roths met with Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, who plays a key role in extraditions. They also had a private meeting in May with U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee at the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem and presented him with a petition with more than 30,000 signatures urging more pressure on Jordan. However, the Roths have yet to meet with Rubio.
For years, Tamimi’s continued freedom has been a blatant symbol of impunity and a painful affront to the victims’ families. Yet lately, we are seeing signs of pressure being applied to the Trump administration. The recent involvement of the U.S. Attorney’s Office, continued high-level meetings and public pressure signal a possible shift and re-energizing of the push to finally hold Jordan accountable for its obligations.
It’s time to force Jordan to choose: Tamimi or $1.5 billion.
U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Friday that creates a designation for state sponsors of wrongful detention of Americans.
A senior U.S. official told reporters that the public can appreciate the measure’s consequential nature by watching videos of Israeli-American Eden Alexander’s White House-brokered release from Hamas captivity earlier this year and Ksenia Karelina’s arrival on American soil after Washington intervened to secure her release from Russia.
“Listen to the voices of the American citizens, who were liberated as hostages and wrongfully detained, and that will give you the significance of the action the president is taking this afternoon,” the official said.
Senior Trump administration officials told reporters that designating states that support detaining Americans wrongfully is based on sanctions of state terror sponsors but has a different scope and purpose. The new designation aims to turn such detentions from a potential asset to a liability, they said.
Under the new order, Washington could bar officials and nationals from the offending country from entering the United States.
The U.S. government interprets the designation “wrongful detention” based on the degree to which the country’s judicial system is impartial, evidence presented against the alleged offender and whether the detention appears to be used as leverage to extract concessions from Washington, the senior officials said.
If offending countries don’t release wrongfully detained Americans prior to penalties being imposed, the new order could also limit U.S. passport holders from traveling to those states.
“We are drawing a very clear delineation today—a line in the sand,” a Trump administration official told reporters. “You will not use Americans as bargaining chips, and there will be severe consequences for anyone who thinks that that which was done under the Biden regime can continue under the second Trump administration.”
The order applies to entities that control significant territory, even if they aren’t recognized governments.
The lives of three U.S. nationals and one unborn American child ended in the Sbarro conflagration. One was a newly married young woman, herself an only child, visiting from New Jersey. She was pregnant with her first baby. Next, a young mother was catastrophically brain-damaged, alive but in a vegetative coma to this day. (The toddler daughter she was eating pizza with survived unharmed and grew up motherless.) And finally, our Malki, an American citizen because her mother is a native New Yorker.
With the help of God and His guidance,
We, Hussein I, King of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, having reviewed the Extradition Treaty signed in Washington on March 28, 1995 between the Government of the Hashemite [Kingdom] of Jordan and the Government of the United States of America, do hereby declare our agreement to and ratification of that Treaty in whole and in part. We further pledge to carry out its provisions and abide by its Articles, and We, God willing, shall not allow its violation.
Accordingly, we have ordered that Our Seal be affixed to it, and We have signed it properly.
Issued on this day the Fifteenth of Safar, 1416 H, corresponding to July 13, 1995, by the Hashemite Court.
Number one, Justice Department officials held a discussion on Thursday with the parents of Malki Roth, the American citizen who was murdered with two others in the Sbarro bombing in Jerusalem back in 2001. The discussion centered around the possible extradition of Jordanian national Ahlam Tamimi. The Jordanians get a billion and a half dollars a year in foreign aid. Democratic and Republican administrations have skated by on this extradition issue for a decade and a half now at least. What’s preventing Secretary Rubio from pushing the Jordanians to finally go through with this extradition?Spokesperson Tammy Bruce promised to get more information. Two days later, Wagenheim was back:
Last question for you. Hopefully I’ll drag an answer out of you on this one. I asked in Tuesday’s briefing about why Secretary Rubio is not pushing harder for the extradition of Ahlam al-Tamimi from Jordan. I was given a written answer by the State Department on that yesterday, after you guys took it back. It basically said we continue to impress upon the Government of Jordan to bring her to justice.
President Trump said on day one – his executive order – American citizens come first in American foreign policy, America and American citizens. Secretary Rubio put out his three questions. Every dollar spent, every program has to answer in the affirmative one of three questions: Does it make America safer? Does it make America stronger? Does it make America more prosperous? I’m sure you have these memorized by heart. A billion and a half dollars of foreign aid to Jordan – how is it conceivable that Tamimi is still there and any of that falls under these dictates of what American foreign policy is supposed to be, with three dead Americans at Tamimi’s hands?
For years, Tamimi’s continued freedom has been a blatant symbol of impunity and a painful affront to the victims’ families. Lately, we are again seeing signs of pressure being applied to the Trump Administration. The recent involvement of the U.S. Attorney’s office, continued high-level meetings, and public pressure signal a possible shift and a re-energizing of the push to finally hold Jordan accountable for its obligations. It’s time to put aid on the line and force Jordan to choose between Tamimi and $1.5 billion.
"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024) PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022) |
![]() |
Buy EoZ's books!
PROTOCOLS: EXPOSING MODERN ANTISEMITISM
If you want real peace, don't insist on a divided Jerusalem, @USAmbIsrael
The Apartheid charge, the Abraham Accords and the "right side of history"
With Palestinians, there is no need to exaggerate: they really support murdering random Jews
Great news for Yom HaShoah! There are no antisemites!