Tuesday, March 04, 2025

03/04 Links Pt2: Columbia’s Choice: Hamasnik Anarchy or Taxpayer Cash; Michael Rapaport: A Message to My Haters up North; Trump Admin To Review $5 Billion in Columbia Grant Funding

From Ian:

Seth Mandel: Columbia’s Choice: Hamasnik Anarchy or Taxpayer Cash
The biggest myth regarding the campus anti-Semitism crisis is that it’s about speech. It is a self-serving myth: Institutions and activists that want to disregard their abuse of Jewish students will fall back on the claim that any attempt to hold them accountable for their actions is actually an attack on free speech.

Columbia University is learning what happens when that disingenuous trick starts to backfire: Students and professors take it as a license to do whatever they want, people end up in the hospital, and the government steps in to say this cannot continue to be done on their dime.

The Biden administration was fearful of standing up to the Hamas youth groups on campus. The Trump administration is happy to do so. Thus we have the announcement that three government agencies—Health and Human Services, the Department of Education, and the General Services Administration—will be reviewing federal contracts and grants with Columbia totaling around $5 billion.

Crucially, the announcement clearly avoids the penalizing of mere speech:
“Americans have watched in horror for more than a year now, as Jewish students have been assaulted and harassed on elite university campuses,” Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in a statement. “Unlawful encampments and demonstrations have completely paralyzed day-to-day campus operations, depriving Jewish students of learning opportunities to which they are entitled. Institutions that receive federal funds have a responsibility to protect all students from discrimination. Columbia’s apparent failure to uphold their end of this basic agreement raises very serious questions about the institution’s fitness to continue doing business with the United States government.”

Assault isn’t speech. Harassment, the definitions of which are laid out in these schools’ policy handbooks, doesn’t include “criticism of Israeli government policy,” as activists and well-meaning but foolish free-speech groups routinely claim. At Harvard, for example, “such aggression must be sufficiently severe or pervasive, and objectively offensive, that it creates a work, educational, or living environment that a reasonable person would consider intimidating, hostile, or abusive and denies the individual an equal opportunity to participate in the benefits of the workplace or the institution’s programs and activities. Unless sufficiently severe or pervasive, a single act typically would not constitute bullying.”

Last, discrimination is also not speech. I wrote about one such prominent example last week: George Washington University’s professional psychology program penalized Jewish students for their religious background and Israeli students on the basis of their national origin, a textbook Title VI civil-rights violation.
Rise of the antisemitic psychologists
In February, the western world was shocked when a TikTok video exposed two Australian nurses, Ahmad “Rashad” Nadir and Sarah Abu Lebdeh, openly reviling Jews and Israelis, insinuating they would not only refuse to treat, but might actually kill — or have killed — an Israeli patient that presented at their hospital. The duo have rightfully been banned from practice anywhere in Australia, but that will not soothe Australian Jews’ fear that this loose-lipped pair are the tip of an iceberg constituted of less self-sabotaging, but equally hateful fellow travellers.

In a previous era, it was well understood in the healing professions that practitioners must never bring their personal biases to the workplace. That is no longer the case. Nobody in the medical community is encouraging nurses to kill Israeli patients, to be sure, but in professional mental-health circles dominated by far-left ideology, discrimination against Jewish students, practitioners and patients is well tolerated, and sometimes encouraged. In short, the domain of mental health, including social work, has become a psychological minefield for North American Jews.

For example, at a November psychology conference in Philadelphia, Villanova University Counseling Center director Nathalie Edmond gave a presentation on “dismantling oppression” featuring a slide show, including one titled “the colonized mind,” which positioned Zionism as equivalent to “internalized racism,” “homophobia” and “rape culture.” Social media pushback came fast and furious, but no heads rolled.

This anecdote captures the spirit of the movement to exclude therapists who identify as Zionists — that is, people who believe Israel has a right to self-determination as a nation-state — from the therapy community. In March 2024, the Facebook group Chicago Anti-Racist Therapists endorsed a blacklist of “therapists/practices with Zionist affiliations that we should avoid referring clients to,” justifying it as a strategy to preclude the promotion of “White supremacy via Zionism.” A responsive flashback to Nazi Germany is not an over-reaction. One “shocked and scared, but not surprised” blacklisted therapist, Michelle Magida, founded a private Jewish therapist Facebook page.

As psychiatrist Sally Satel notes in a Free Press article on the subject, two issues arise from the story. The first, trying to prevent clinicians who support the existence of Israel, or are simply Jewish, from treating patients “constitutes a grave breach of professional ethics.”

The second is the “alarming” trend in psychotherapy — she calls it “critical social justice therapy” — to insist on psychotherapy as “foremost, a political rather than a clinical enterprise.” Under this rubric, therapists with the “wrong” politics are not trustworthy with patients. As for patients with the same “wrong” convictions, correction of their error should be the focus of treatment.

This Sovietization of psychotherapy is a cross-border phenomenon, and so is a heavy antisemitic presence in therapy associations. The American Psychological Association (APA), the largest psychological association in the world, is considered a hotbed of antisemitism by many observers. A just-published Open Letter “demanding accountability” from APA, replete with evidence, signed by 3,556 “Psychologists against Antisemitism,” notes that “(w)hile APA has issued statements in solidarity with Ukraine and apologized to People of Color for perpetuating racism, it has remained inactive regarding the 500% spike in attacks against Jews, who represent only 2% of the population yet experience over half of all religion-based hate crimes according to FBI statistics.”
Michael Rapaport: A Message to My Haters up North
I’ve seen a lot of hate in the past 513 days. Two months after Hamas’s massacre, anti-Israel groups launched a social media campaign to discourage people from attending my show in Sacramento. In January last year, my show in Portland, Oregon, was protested, too. Six months after that, a Chicago venue canceled my act over “safety concerns.” And the day after hooligans chased Jewish soccer fans through the streets of Amsterdam in November 2024, hundreds turned up to demonstrate against my gig in Lakeview, Illinois—a Chicago suburb heavily populated with Jews.

I’m not alone. Many of my fellow Jewish performers are facing this kind of abuse right now simply because we support the existence of a Jewish state.

But on Friday morning, I woke up to the craziest campaign against me yet.

When I checked my social media feed, I saw that Heather McPherson, who is in the Canadian Parliament and a member of the New Democratic Party, was not just attacking me, but calling on her government to deny my entry into the country.

“New Democrats are alarmed that American personality Michael Rapaport is scheduled to perform in Canada,” she posted.

“Rapaport, who has a significant criminal history, also has a long history of racist and Islamophobic speech, and of inciting violence and supporting terrorism. We are witnessing an alarming increase in Islamophobia in Canada and globally. All Canadians deserve to feel safe in our communities.”

At the end, she once again urged Justin Trudeau’s party to take action against me, saying: “New Democrats are calling on the Liberal government to deny entry to Michael Rapaport.”

Now, I’ve got no beef with Ms. McPherson. I’ve never met her or even heard of her, which is something I have in common with most people. But I guess what ticked her off is that I’m headed to Canada this week to perform five stand-up shows in Edmonton, Alberta’s capital city, which McPherson represents.


Trump Admin To Review $5 Billion in Columbia Grant Funding, Citing Ivy League School's 'Apparent Failure' To Address Anti-Semitism
The Trump administration’s multi-agency task force to combat anti-Semitism is launching a review of Columbia University's contracts and grants, citing the Ivy League institution's "apparent failure" to protect Jewish students. It will probe more than $5 billion in federal funding commitments and could issue stop orders impacting more than $51 million in active contracts.

The Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Education, and the U.S. General Services Administration announced the move in a Monday night press release. It came almost immediately after Secretary of Education Linda McMahon's confirmation.

"Americans have watched in horror for more than a year now, as Jewish students have been assaulted and harassed on elite university campuses. Unlawful encampments and demonstrations have completely paralyzed day-to-day campus operations, depriving Jewish students of learning opportunities to which they are entitled," McMahon said in a statement.

"Institutions that receive federal funds have a responsibility to protect all students from discrimination. Columbia’s apparent failure to uphold their end of this basic agreement raises very serious questions about the institution’s fitness to continue doing business with the United States government."

McMahon has said she "wholeheartedly" supports President Donald Trump's call to close the Department of Education. In the meantime, however, she's pledged to focus on tackling campus anti-Semitism and DEI initiatives. Before her confirmation, in late January, Trump directed all federal agencies "to combat the explosion of anti-Semitism on our campuses and in our streets since October 7, 2023." The Justice Department launched an anti-Semitism task force to "root out anti-Semitic harassment in schools and on college campuses" shortly thereafter.


UKLFI: BBC and Hoyo Films Reported to Counter Terrorism Police
The BBC has been reported by UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI) to the Counter Terrorism Police for possible terrorism offences. UKLFI has also reported the co-producers of the production company Hoyo Films for possible terrorism and fraud offences.

These reports were made in connection with the documentary “Gaza: How To Survive A War Zone”, which was screened on BBC on 17th February, and featured a child narrator, who was the son of a Hamas government member.

The BBC admitted in a formal statement that the production company had made payments to the family of the child narrator of the film, knowing he was the son of a member of the Hamas government.

According to the statement, the BBC asked the production company “in writing a number of times” about any potential connections the child narrator and his family might have with Hamas. UKLFI considers that this is evidence that the BBC suspected that the child might be connected to Hamas and that money paid for his narration might be used for the purposes of terrorism.

However, the production company failed to reveal to the BBC the information they knew about the child’s Hamas connections.

UKLFI has reported the BBC to the Counter-Terrorism police under Section 17 of the Terrorism Act 2000, according to which

“A person commits an offence if—
(a) he enters into or becomes concerned in an arrangement as a result of which money or other property is made available or is to be made available to another, and
(b) he knows or has reasonable cause to suspect that it will or may be used for the purposes of terrorism.”

In addition, if a person “(a) believes or suspects that another person has committed an offence under any of sections 15 to 18, and (b) bases his belief or suspicion on information which comes to his attention … in the course of a trade, profession or business, or … employment …”, they have a duty to disclose this to the police according to Section 19 of the Terrorism Act 2000. It is an offence not to disclose it. Since it appears unlikely that the BBC reported their suspicions to the police, UKLFI has also reported the BBC for this Section 19 offence.

Prior to the BBC’s statement, UKLFI had already reported the two producers from Hoyo Films to the police for various possible terrorism offences, including providing money with reasonable cause to suspect that it may be used for terrorism. UKLFI has now also reported possible breaches by them of Sections 2 and/or 3 of the Fraud Act 2006, which prohibit fraud by false representation and by failing to disclose information, respectively.
BBC director general: I lost trust in the flawed BBC Gaza film
BBC director general Tim Davie has admitted he is aware of a “small payment” being made to the sister of the son of the Hamas official who featured in a documentary on Gaza.

Appearing before the Culture, Media and Sport Committee on Tuesday alongside BBC chair Samir Shah, Davie said he is “not ruling anything out” when asked if the documentary on Gaza could return to iPlayer.

Shah told Committee: “To my shock, I think we found there were serious failings on the independent production side and on the BBC side.”

The BBC chair added: “We now need to decide what action we are going to take.”

The corporation removed the documentary Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone from the BBC’s on demand service after it emerged that the child narrator is the son of Ayman Alyazouri, who has worked as Hamas’s deputy minister of agriculture.

Davie told the Committee: “In terms of saying there was a specific question around the father of the boy, as we have dug into it, we have found out we were not told.”

He praised the “fantastic teams” working at the BBC, adding:”If you’re asked a question a number of times and that question was not answered …

“As editor in chief I have to be secure not only editorially where the film’s at, but the making of that film. At that point, quite frankly I lost trust in that film.”

The broadcaster apologised last week for “serious flaws” in the making of the programme after conducting an initial review and it has launched a further internal probe.

Davie told the Committee: “As editor-in-chief, I have to be secured, not only editorially where the film’s at, but the making of that film. And at that point, quite quickly, I lost trust in that film.

“Therefore I have taken the decision, took the decision quite quickly, to take it off iPlayer while we do this deep dive.”


Channel 4 used Hamas official’s son in award-winning coverage
Channel 4 News featured the son of a Hamas official in its award-winning Gaza coverage.

For seven months, Channel 4 News broadcast footage of Abdullah al-Yazouri, who was then 13, without disclosing he was the son of Dr Ayman Alyazouri, the deputy agriculture minister in Gaza’s Hamas-run government.

At one point, the programme reported that Abdullah was selling chocolate on the streets of Rafah to “make a living” and “help support his family”.

Channel 4 News has won at least six awards for its coverage of the Israel-Hamas war. Both the Royal Television Society (RTS) and the Press Gazette named it news programme of the year in 2024. It won the same honour at the Broadcast Awards this year.

The programme won a Bafta and an International Emmy for war reporting last year, while reporters including Secunder Kermani, the foreign affairs correspondent, earned individual awards for Gaza coverage.

However, on Monday, the RTS, which named it “network daily news programme of the year” last February, told The Telegraph the award was now “under review”.

Abdullah is the teenager who narrated the BBC’s now-discredited documentary Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone. Last week, the BBC pulled the film from iPlayer and apologised for “serious flaws” in its production.


Kassy Akiva: The Truth About The Oscar-Winning Anti-Israel Documentary ‘No Other Land’
His Israeli co-director, left-wing journalist Yuval Abraham, chimed in, claiming that he is free as an Israeli, while Adra is “under military law that destroys his life and he cannot control.”

But according to the Israeli NGO Regavim, the documentary relies on a “concoction of misrepresentations and outright fabrications.”

“This is a propaganda film that serves the false Palestinian narrative, and seeks to undermine the legitimacy of the State of Israel in the international arena in order to cause boycotts and sanctions of IDF fighters,” Meir Deutsch, director-general of Regavim, said in a statement.

Throughout the film, Adra documents his struggle to stop the Israeli Defense Forces from demolishing what are described as “ancient villages” in an area called Masafer Yatta, which is east of the Palestinian Authority town of Yatta. In reality, Regavim points out, all of the so-called villages of Masafer Yatta did not exist when Israel declared the area an IDF training zone for live-fire exercises in the early 1980s.

The name Masafer Yatta is believed to come from the word “traveling,” a reference to its distance from Yatta, or from the Arabic word for “nothing” or “zero,” a reference to the desert wasteland that was not suitable for anything.

Aerial photographs dating as far back as 1945 — some of which the Arabs submitted themselves to the Israeli Supreme Court — show no signs of a residential presence before the 1980s. Not until the 2000s does the area have signs of habitation in the images.

The IDF routinely blocked attempts to build illegal structures on the training ground in the 1980s and 1990s when the Israeli Air Force and IDF were conducting live-fire exercises. However, Arab farmers and shepherds were allowed to use the zone when there were lulls in training to plant and harvest crops and graze livestock.

IDF Firing Zone 918, where Masafer Yatta is located, is within “Area C” of Judea and Samaria, which is under full Israeli control under the Oslo Accords. Yatta is located in “Area A,” which puts it under the full control of the Palestinian Authority. “Area B” is under dual Israeli and Palestinian Authority control.

In 2000, a group of Arabs petitioned to Israel’s High Court of Justice to block the demolition orders issued against their squatter structures, leading to a temporary injunction that suspended demolitions and prohibited new, permanent construction.

During the 12 years of deliberation over the petition, the group of Arabs continued to rapidly increase construction, which has been funded in part by European countries. Several photos Regavim has taken at the sites of the illegal building have signs attributing funding to the European Union, other European governments, and UK Aid, a foreign aid agency of the United Kingdom. Some of the signs state that the villages are part of “The State of Palestine.”


California is now at the heart of the battle against woke anti-Semitism
In California, Jewish legislators are campaigning to keep CRT’s pernicious influence contained, and to mitigate the worst consequences of the new “ethnic studies” guidelines. But the CRT radicals remain deeply entrenched and well-placed within school bureaucracies and the teacher’s unions. Many blue states still embrace policies that discriminate on the basis of race and gender. The Biden administration to its shame promoted critical race theory. Much the same has occurred in the likes of Minnesota.

So even as Trump and his allies seek to counter DEI and CRT, it’s going to be a tough struggle at some elite universities. In some cases, anti-Jewish sentiment is widespread. Jewish students face professors hectoring against Israel and demonstrators who have blocked off access to school buildings for “Zionists”. Erwin Chemerinsky, Berkeley’s Law School dean and well-known progressive, wrote in the LA Times that “nothing has prepared me for the anti-Semitism” now clearly evident at Berkeley and other campuses.

Despite these outrages, it won’t be easy to remove these antics. Already some universities are rallying to keep discriminatory practices, even in red states. Their oligarchic funding is unlikely to run out in the near future. At least until Trump, Leftist activism was often subsidised by federal taxes, something the public had little notion about.

In the long term, however, the decline of CRT should mark a step towards a society closer to Dr King’s ethos, particularly critical for a country that may become predominantly non-white by mid-century. Crowing about the end of “the US white majority” might be popular in ethnic studies departments but has not translated into a better life for most minorities. America’s great strength is that it was not founded on the basis of any particular ethnicity and has successfully evolved to become more inclusive; a fundamentally racist society would not be such a lure for new Latin American, African or Asian immigrants.

Getting rid of DEI, CRT and their offsprings is one step towards this new post-racial future. It represents the rejection of the sectarianism preached by “racial justice” activists in the West, Hamas and other jihadis, and by far-Right sectarians across the West. America, indeed, all of Western society, needs not more separation but more unforced integration.

CRT needs to be returned to the obscurity of its origins in the university hothouse. What is needed instead is a commitment to help raise people from poor circumstances, whichever race they happen to be. True social justice cannot be accomplished by turning people against one another.
Center for American Progress pushes aside Israel critic Patrick Gaspard from leadership
In returning to the Center for American Progress last week as president and chief executive, Neera Tanden landed just where she had left off when she departed the influential liberal think tank four years ago to join the Biden administration as a top domestic policy advisor.

But while her homecoming was heralded by the center as crucial to developing a new Democratic agenda to help counter President Donald Trump, it also came as a tacit rebuke of Patrick Gaspard, who led the organization in Tanden’s absence and is now serving as a distinguished senior fellow.

The center made no mention of Gaspard in its announcement of the leadership change. But two people familiar with the situation confirmed to Jewish Insider that his move to a largely titular role was not voluntary. Instead, he was pushed aside to make room for Tanden, the sources said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive issue.

The demotion comes as Gaspard’s stewardship of CAP, which consistently failed to fundraise sufficiently to meet its roughly $50 million annual budget throughout his tenure, had fueled what one source with knowledge of the matter called a growing sense of “discomfort” among board members as well as “discontent” from donors about a lack of attention to fundraising.

“The kindest thing I can say about him is he was not putting basic time and attention into his fundraising responsibilities,” the person told JI, noting that CAP “was on a very unsustainable path” when it chose to replace Gaspard.

In a brief phone conversation with JI on Thursday, Gaspard denied he had been forced to relinquish his position leading the nonprofit. “This is categorically false information,” a CAP spokesperson added in a statement. “Patrick is an important part of the CAP family, and we are thrilled to continue our important work with him.”
Barnard President Rosenbury: When Student Protest Goes Too Far
We will vigorously pursue discipline and other remedies against those who forcibly and illegitimately entered the building, damaged or destroyed property, disregarded our community expectations, and violated many policies and rules. To those who hide behind masks, we invite you to step forward, not in anonymity but in dialogue. We welcome respectful conversation in a space of shared learning and accountability. That requires knowing who is at the table. Last week was a test, set in motion by Barnard’s decision to act decisively after the classroom disruption. Expulsion is always an extraordinary measure, but we did what needed to be done, and we will continue to do so. That means removing from our community those who refuse to share our values of respect, inclusion, and academic excellence. That means a disciplinary process that is fair, with an appeals process that does not include taking a building hostage. Even when under enormous pressure from outside groups, we will ensure our community is safe and free from discrimination and intimidation, while also supporting students as they grow, learn, and make mistakes. We will stand strong and act thoughtfully, even while being criticized for being both too punitive and not punitive enough. Disrupting classes and defacing buildings to intimidate and divide our community is not academic exploration. It is a betrayal of the goals and sanctity of higher education. Barnard had the courage to take a stand. To protect and defend higher education, others must do the same.


Trump admin threatens to pull $51M in contracts with Columbia for NYC college’s inaction on protests that harass Jewish students
The Trump administration threatened Monday to pull more than $50 million in government contracts it has with Columbia University — pointing to the Ivy League school’s alleged inaction to get a handle on anti-Israel protests that have targeted Jewish students.

Federal officials announced they were considering placing “Stop Work Orders” on $51.4 million worth of contracts and reviewing more than $5 billion in federal grant commitments tied to the Big Apple university to ensure the rights of Jewish students are being met.

“Anti-Semitism – like racism – is a spiritual and moral malady that sickens societies and kills people with lethalities comparable to history’s most deadly plagues,” Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in a statement.

The looming warning to the school is part of an ongoing investigation into possible civil rights violations and comes after President Trump formed the Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism when he got into office in January to fight against vile hate being carried out on college campuses.

Newly minted Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said in a statement Monday that since the start of the conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, Americans have “watched in horror” as Jewish students have been assaulted and harassed at elite colleges.

“Unlawful encampments and demonstrations have completely paralyzed day-to-day campus operations, depriving Jewish students of learning opportunities to which they are entitled,” she said.

Columbia said it was reviewing the federal government’s message and hoped to work with the White House to fight antisemitism.

“Columbia is fully committed to combatting antisemitism and all forms of discrimination, and we are resolute that calling for, promoting, or glorifying violence or terror has no place at our University,” the school stated Monday night.
Columbia University Instructor Cancels Class for Anti-Israel Protest, Day After Radicals Storm Campus Building
A Columbia University instructor who defended last spring’s illegal pro-Hamas encampments canceled his classes Thursday so students could attend an anti-Israel protest—one day after radicals stormed a campus building at Columbia’s sister school, Barnard College.

A source with knowledge of the circumstances told the Washington Free Beacon that the lecturer is Conor Cullen, who teaches philosophy at Columbia and has consistently supported anti-Israel encampments and protests on campus. He dismissed his contemporary civilization class after students asked for time off to "support the student protest movement" and attend an anti-Israel rally.

One of Cullen’s students, who declined to be named, said he and his classmate were "in shock" after the professor asked students to take a "blind vote" on whether to cancel the class.

Columbia called Cullen’s decision a "serious breach of University policy" and said it would be "investigated and addressed swiftly."

"[W]e apologize to our students and community members for this unacceptable infringement on our core academic mission," said Columbia in a statement.

On Wednesday, an anti-Israel mob stormed a Barnard building, assaulting and injuring a staff member. The radicals were protesting the expulsion of two Barnard students who were part of a group that rushed into a Columbia class and handed out flyers depicting a trampled Star of David.

Another anti-Israel rally protesting the Barnard students’ expulsion was scheduled for Thursday. That morning, Cullen "mentioned that a noticeably large chunk of students was missing from the class and that he suspected these students were skipping out to support the protests against the disciplinary action of these two Barnard (anti-semitic) students," the unnamed student wrote in a letter to Columbia officials.

"He then opened up the class for discussion in which two students voiced their opinions in support of the class being canceled to support the student protest movement and the protest that was to occur on the main campus later today at 12:45," the student continued. "Meanwhile, the rest of the class stayed silent, eyes looking to one another in shock."

"Our professor then instructed the class to close their eyes and take a blind vote on whether to cancel class, not cancel class, or not vote," the student wrote. "This resulted in him deciding to cancel the class as well as his 2:10 - 4:00 pm class section later in the day as well."

The student said the cancellation was "not acceptable and should not be tolerated," adding that the university community "needs to wake up!"


Board member of anti-Israel teachers’ union is member of American Communist Party
A member of the Massachusetts Teachers Association executive board is also a member of the American Communist Party — a group with direct connections to Hamas and Hezbollah, Jewish Insider has learned.

Several American Communist Party leaders attended the funeral of Hassan Nasrallah, secretary-general of Hezbollah until his recent assassination by the Israeli army, and met with Hamas leaders in person in recent weeks.

In a Feb. 14 letter obtained by JI, the party wrote that it “strongly condemns recent attempts by Zionist politicians to intimidate the MTA and Palestine solidarity movement by singling out and fear-mongering about a member of our party, Comrade Joe Herosy.” The statement was referring to a Feb. 10 Massachusetts Legislature Special Commission to Combat Antisemitism meeting, where members expressed concern over a series of Herosy’s social media posts — including a photo he posted to Facebook on Oct. 8, 2023, that appeared to celebrate Hamas’ deadly massacre that took place the day prior.

Herosy is on the board of directors of MTA, the largest teachers’ union in the state. On March 12, 2024, in response to a controversial MTA webinar on antisemitism, he claimed that the “Israel lobby” is “a tool of U.S. Imperialism as opposed to the common false idea that Israel is controlling U.S. policy.” In the same exchange, he accused Israel of “genocide,” “settler-colonialism” and “apartheid.”

The webinar was scrutinized by parents and teachers who said that it portrayed “inaccurate historical events” and came as the union has been accused of frequently perpetrating antisemitism in the classroom since the Oct. 7 attacks.
MTA has yet to remove antisemitic teaching materials from its resource list, critics say
The Massachusetts Teachers Association (MTA) is under fire for not removing all alleged antisemitic materials from an educators’ resource list on the Israel-Hamas war.

According to a report by the Boston Herald, Jewish advocacy groups, the Anti-Defamation League, teachers, and state officials are blasting the MTA for not fully following through on its agreement to remove links to certain materials that critics say are biased and offensive.

The MTA said it would remove “any materials that do not further the cause of promoting understanding.” The concession followed a heated Feb. 10 State House hearing led by the Special Commission on Combatting Antisemitism. At the hearing, MTA President Max Page was hammered with questions about the material and accused lawmakers of “political grandstanding.”

Page and MTA Vice President Deb McCarthy later released a statement saying, “The way these resources were manipulated in such a fashion, so as to label the state’s largest union of educators as promoters of antisemitism, remains one of the more deplorable displays witnessed at the State House.”

The controversial material depicted a Star of David made out of folded dollar bills, a poster showing a hand grabbing a snake’s tongue with the words “unity in confronting Zionism,” and a poster depicting a person holding an automatic weapon with the words “what was taken by force can only be returned by force.”

Critics say only some of the materials have been removed, but that as much as 95 percent of the controversial content remains available on the union’s “Resources on Israel and Occupied Palestine.”

“As far as I can gather based on what MTA members have shared and told me, there are still an abundance of antisemitic and one-sided materials on the site,” State. Sen. John Velis, who is a co-chair on the Special Commission on Combatting Antisemitism, told the Herald. “To be sure, some have been taken down.

One such example, according to the Herald, is a link to a children’s workbook that calls Zionists “bullies.” The workbook, titled “Handala’s Return,” was created by the Palestinian Feminist Collective and focuses on a Palestinian child’s experience as a refugee.


Not Fired, Just Demoted: Hamas Apologist Digs In at MSNBC
MSNBC didn't fire Ayman Mohyeldin, the Hamas-aligned host of a poorly rated weekend show—they just demoted him. The left-wing network announced last week it was canceling Ayman, which aired Saturdays and Sundays at 7 p.m., as part of its ongoing restructuring in the face of financial difficulties. But the controversial host isn't going anywhere.

"I'm not leaving the network, in fact, quite the opposite," a defiant Mohyeldin told a handful of viewers over the weekend. "Despite the challenging and fearless ways we have covered stories on this show for more than two years, MSNBC has offered to extend my tenure at the company." Mohyeldin will cohost a new weekend program, launching in April, alongside two other personalities that have yet to be announced.

"Soon, this show, the name, the format will change, and I will be joined by two new incredible hosts who will be announced soon enough," Mohyeldin said. "But one thing that won’t change is my promise to you, the viewers, that I won’t stop talking about the difficult stories and challenging topics that others don’t cover." Mohyeldin acknowledged how "saddened" he was by the firing of his "dear friend, ally, and colleague, the fearless Joy Reid," but declined to echo star host Rachel Maddow, who accused MSNBC of deliberately suppressing non-white voices.

The demoted host's comment about "challenging topics that others don't cover" was presumably in reference to his long history of antagonism toward Israel. Mohyeldin has been the foremost Hamas cheerleader on MSNBC since the departure of fellow anti-Israel activist Mehdi Hasan in 2023. Otherwise his show is relatively standard fare for MSNBC, examining topics such as "how Democrats should resist Trump's agenda" and how the "GOP's attack on DEI" has gone too far.


MEMRI: Arab Writers: The Arabs And The Resistance Axis Must Acknowledge Their Defeat In The War With Israel; We Must Strive For An Era Without War
With the conclusion of the fighting between Israel and Hamas, Hizbullah and other members of the resistance axis, articles in the Arab media condemned the rhetoric regarding the historic victory over Israel promoted by spokespeople for these organizations.[1] The articles argued that these organizations, far from defeating Israel, actually suffered a crushing defeat in the war, as evident from the heavy damage and losses sustained by them and by and the local populations. They also stated that the outcomes of the war proved that the doctrine of 'unity of the fronts' formulated by the Iran-led resistance axis – whereby all the axis members would assist each other in the event of a war against Israel – had collapsed.

The writers described this defeat as another link in the chain of defeats suffered by the Arabs in the wars they have waged against Israel since its establishment under the banner of the "Palestinian cause." They argued that these defeats are the final nail in the coffin of the Palestinian issue as the foremost cause of the Arab world and are a reflection of Israel's power in the region. The writers therefore called on those who fought against Israel and on the entire Arab nation to recognize their defeat and dedicate their efforts to developing their countries instead of engaging in futile wars.

The following are translated excerpts from these articles:
Hamas And Hizbullah Were Defeated; The Doctrine Of The "Unity Of The Fronts" Has Collapsed

One of the major arguments presented in the articles against Hamas and Hizbullah's claims of victory is the extent of the damage and losses sustained by them and their environment. This, the writers said, not only represents a defeat for these two central members of the resistance axis, but also shows that the "unity of the fronts," a key doctrine of this axis, has completely collapsed.

Lebanese journalist Jean Al-Feghali, chief editor at the LBCI News channel, wrote in the Lebanese daily Nidaa Al-Watan: "...Hamas, which started this war... was defeated in it, and anyone who wants to contest this should examine the balance of gains and losses: the part of Gaza that is aboveground no longer exists; it is completely destroyed; [Hamas'] leaders have been eliminated, from Yahya Sinwar [the architect of the October 7 attack] to Isma'il Haniya... So how can this be considered a victory?

"What is true for Hamas and its 'victory' in Gaza is also true for Hizbullah and its 'victory' in Lebanon: more than 20 towns and villages on the southern "front" [i.e., on the border with Israel] have been destroyed... Most of Hizbullah's leaders, from Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah, through field commanders, to Radwan Force fighters have been killed, not to mention the [destruction of] the ammunition and missile depots. So how can this be considered a victory?

"The outcome is 'a unity of defeats,' stemming from 'the unity of the fronts': Hizbullah has been defeated in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza… The collapse of the 'unity of the fronts' is patently evident from the fact that Hizbullah agreed to a ceasefire without conditioning it on a ceasefire in Gaza… So where is the unity of the fronts?"[2]


Colby says nuclear Iran an ‘existential danger’ to the U.S., backpedaling on past views
Elbridge Colby, the nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy, said at his Senate Armed Services Committee confirmation hearing on Tuesday that he now views a nuclear-armed Iran as an “existential” threat to the United States homeland and said he would provide military options to the administration to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon if necessary.

Colby also sought to distance himself from Michael DiMino, who prompted alarm among supporters of Israel after being named deputy assistant secretary of defense for the Middle East.

Colby’s comments suggest he’s backtracking on his past views that the U.S. could contain a nuclear-armed Iran, and that the consequences of striking Iran to eliminate its nuclear program would be worse than those of Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon, which had raised serious concerns for Senate Republicans.

But when pressed in detail about his past comments, Colby also tried to justify them by arguing he was merely pushing back against what he viewed as an overly hawkish consensus at the time. And he underscored, later in the hearing, that the Trump administration’s goal is to reach a “trust-but-verify negotiated agreement” with Iran — with a military option available.

Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR), a skeptic of Colby’s nomination, questioned Colby on his views towards Iran, saying he had concerns about Colby’s past comments and that they were inconsistent with the administration’s policy.

Pressed by Cotton on whether he considers a nuclear-armed Iran to be an “existential danger to us … not just a ‘severe danger,’ as you said in response to Sen. Gillibrand or a ‘significant one’ as you said in your written answers,” Colby said he agreed.

“Yes, a nuclear-armed Iran — especially, Senator, given that … we know they’ve worked on ICBM-range capabilities and other capabilities that would pose an existential danger to the United States,” Colby said.

He said that it was consistent with his understanding that Iran’s nuclear program poses an immediate danger to Israel and U.S. Arab allies and that Iran would have the capabilities to strike the continental United States within a few years.
Russian missile experts flew to Iran amid clashes with Israel
Several senior Russian missile specialists have visited Iran over the past year as the Islamic Republic has deepened its defense cooperation with Moscow, a Reuters review of travel records and employment data indicates.

The seven weapons experts were booked to travel from Moscow to Tehran aboard two flights on April 24 and September 17 last year, according to documents detailing the two group bookings as well as the passenger manifest for the second flight.

The booking records include the men's passport numbers, with six of the seven having the prefix "20." That denotes a passport used for official state business, issued to government officials on foreign work trips and military personnel stationed abroad, according to an edict published by the Russian government and a document on the Russian foreign ministry's website.

Reuters was unable to determine what the seven were doing in Iran.

A senior Iranian defense ministry official said Russian missile experts had made multiple visits to Iranian missile production sites last year, including two underground facilities, with some of the visits taking place in September. The official, who requested anonymity to discuss security matters, didn't identify the sites.
Witness list for Senate antisemitism hearing draws from wide array of backgrounds
Republicans and Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee are set to call witnesses from a wide range of backgrounds for Wednesday’s hearing on antisemitism, two sources familiar with the witness list told Jewish Insider.

Republicans will be calling Adela Cojab, a former student activist and legal fellow at the National Jewish Advocacy Center; Alyza Lewin, the president of the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law; and Asra Nomani, the editor of the Pearl Project.

Democrats will call Kevin Rachlin, the Washington director of the Nexus Leadership Project, and Meirav Solomon, a Jewish student at Tufts University and co-vice president of J Street U’s New England branch, as their witnesses.

Committee leaders did not respond to requests for comment.

Contentious topics at the hearing could include the use of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s working definition of antisemitism, which some progressive critics say suppresses free speech, and the Trump administration’s recent moves to address campus antisemitism.

Cojab, an activist, author, podcaster and public speaker, sued New York University over campus antisemitism issues predating the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks on Israel under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.

Lewin, of the Brandeis Center, has a long career fighting antisemitism through the legal system.

Nomani is a former Wall Street Journal reporter who co-founded the Pearl Project, a nonprofit journalism initiative named for Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, who was murdered by Islamist militants in Pakistan. Some of her recent work has focused on the ties between Islamic extremists and U.S. activists and Hamas’ propaganda efforts. She also co-founded the Muslim Reform Movement and the Clarity Coalition, which oppose antisemitism.

Nomani told JI that she plans to “break the fourth wall to expose the anti-Semitic propagandists and professional protestors who will undoubtedly be sitting behind me in the audience” and “chronicle how they are part of a multi-million dollar network of ideologues from the far left to Islamists, who spread misinformation, manipulate narratives and incite hatred against Jews under the guise of ‘free speech’ and ‘academic freedom.’”
Munich reopens investigations into 1970 arson attack that killed seven Jews
The Munich Public Prosecutor's Office reopened investigations into an arson attack on a Jewish retirement home in Munich, which caused the deaths of seven residents in February 1970, Bild reported last week, citing public officials.

Senior Public Prosecutor Andreas Franch told the German media outlet, "On January 31, 2025, the Munich Public Prosecutor's Office initiated an investigation into the arson attack on the Israelite Religious Community's nursing home."

The investigations reopened after a witness came forward to the antisemitism commissioner for the Bavarian judiciary.

While little is public knowledge, BILD reported that the information provided by the witness is deemed credible so far. Victims of the arson attack

Those killed during the arson attack on February 13, 1970, include Regina Rivka Becher, 59; David Jakubowicz, 59; Rosa Drucker, 59; Georg Eljakim Pfau, 63; Leopold Arie Leib Gimpel, 69; Siegfried Offenbacher, 71; and Meir Max Blum, 71.

Two of the victims, Jakubowicz and Pfau, were Holocaust survivors. While Jakukbowicz was originally from Czechoslovakia, Pfau held both German and Israeli citizenship, according to the Jewish Telegraph Agency. Offenbacher also had Israeli citizenship.

An additional 13 people were wounded, and a synagogue was damaged.

The fire was started by gasoline poured into the stairwell of the Israelite Religious Community’s nursing home, and the fire quickly spread.
Archbishop Reveals Celebrity Priest Calvin Robinson Was Fired For Serial Antisemitism
In late January, Archbishop Mark Haverland fired the British priest Calvin Robinson, who has become something of a celebrity in conservative political circles over the last few years, for mimicking a “Nazi salute” at a pro-life rally in Washington, D.C. Though Robinson maintains his innocence, the archbishop recently released a statement documenting a series of warnings issued to the celebrity priest concerning his antisemitism and political activism.

The Anglican Ink website published Archbishop Mark Haverland’s correspondence with the priest after Robinson maintained on X that he had “not received a single letter, phone call, zoom meeting or anything else” from his archbishop since he joined the Anglican Catholic Church.

“In December of 2024, Robinson began posting about Judaism, starting with a post on X about the Talmud,” Haverland noted, highlighting the celebrity cleric’s escalating antisemitic attacks, in a six-page statement released last Wednesday.

The initial offending post from Robinson read: “The Talmud is uniquely hostile toward Jesus Christ. Islam may play off Christianity — it is a Christian heresy — but Talmudic Judaism is explicitly anti-Christian.” He was citing a quote from Joel Webbon, pastor of Covenant Bible Church in Georgetown, Texas.

Evil Judaism?
Robinson invited Webbon onto his show, “Bros with Fros,” even though Webbon is “a public figure whose antisemitic priors are well established,” Haverland wrote. “During the interview Robinson sat nodding while Webbon stated, ‘religiously, spiritually, Judaism, I believe, is a pernicious evil.’”

Haverland said that he had “received expressions of concern” from clergy within and outstide his denomination that “Robinson was courting anti-Semites online” and “communicated his displeasure” about the priest to Bishop Patrick Fodor of the Diocese of the Missouri Valley, “telling him very clearly that such incendiary activity had to stop.”

Fodor warned Robinson that he was in trouble with his archbishop. On December 13, Robinson wrote to Haverland insisting he was “not antisemitic or a holocaust denier.”

However, the archbishop maintained that Robinson had begun “to use certain rhetoric that was clearly and intentionally anti-Semitic” despite the priest framing his discourse as “just asking questions” and “being anti-Zionist, not anti-Semitic.”
Quebec man sentenced to 5 years for antisemitic comments, 3D printing
Pascal Tribout, 38, was sentenced by a Quebec court to four years prison term for 3D printing firearms and an additional year, to be served consecutively, for antisemitic comments he made online, according to Canadian media reports and Jewish organizations.

Tribout pled guilty in December and was sentenced at the Valleyfield courthouse at the end of February. Judge Sylvain Lepine reportedly ordered that Tribout turn over a sample of his DNA and banned him from possessing weapons for 10 years.

Canada’s Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs welcomed the sentence, adding that “this case reminds us that antisemitism can take many forms, including among neo-Nazi and anti-vaccine conspiracies.”

“We are very satisfied with the sentence. The firearms were not functional,” prosecutor Gabriel Lapierre told The Montreal Gazette.

Lapierre noted that Tribout was the first to be sentenced in Canada for using a 3D printer to make firearms.
Vandals spray paint swastikas on Clarington playground equipment in ‘hate-motivated’ weekend attack
Vandals spray painted “hate-motivated graffiti” onto playground equipment in Clarington over the weekend, continuing a troubling trend of Nazi symbols being featured in acts of vandalism across Durham Region.

In the latest incident, which was investigated by police on Saturday afternoon, Durham police say vandals spray painted swastikas and other hate-motivated graffiti on playground equipment in Stuart Park.

Officers responded to the park, located at 58 Stuart Rd., around 4:15 p.m. on March 1, where they found one swastika spray-painted on a slide and another along with “profane language,” say police.

The swastika is a notorious symbol of Nazi racism associated with the genocide of six million Jews during the Second World War.

Police and municipal staff have since removed the graffiti.


How Germany’s new leader can make history
Merz has declared that achieving “independence from the U.S.” in defense matters is his explicit aim. He is pushing for Germany’s defense budget to be boosted by more than $200 billion—no doubt an example Trump would urge other European leaders to follow. Merz and French President Emmanuel Macron, who also sits on the center-right, are leading a push for European nations to take charge of their own defense, warmly citing Poland as a case of a government that has made this a priority, bolstering its defense spending in 2025 to nearly $50 billion.

As daunting as this task will be, it will yield more concrete results than an endless, fruitless debate with a White House that has so far taken a much more benign view of Russia than that found in European capitals. Trump may deem that Moscow is not a threat to Washington—at least not in territorial terms—but it remains the greatest single threat facing Europe. There is much to prevent Russian dictator Vladimir Putin from pushing his forces beyond Ukraine, not least his country’s faltering economy and the eye-watering human cost of his illegal, brutal invasion of his southern neighbor, but any European leader who believes that he will stop there is a fool. Indeed, if Trump does secure a peace deal between Moscow and Kyiv, Putin could well see that as a golden chance to regroup and rearm his forces. The challenge for Merz is to be ready for that eventuality and to be prepared to respond to any further Russian aggression with the use of force, with or without the United States.

A militarily strong Europe with Germany at its center (words that would have been unthinkable for most of the postwar era!) would be good news for Ukraine and other states in Russia’s sights. It would also be good news for Israel.

One of Merz’s first acts after winning the election was to announce that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was welcome to visit Germany without fearing that the arrest warrant issued for him by the International Criminal Court in The Hague would be executed on German soil, something the previous government of SPD Chancellor Olaf Scholz wavered on.

Merz has also stated that Germany’s relationship with the Jewish state created from the ashes of the Nazi Holocaust is “unique—no ifs or buts.” Following the Hamas pogrom in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, Merz said that Palestinian asylum seekers would not be welcome in Germany because his country “already has too many antisemites.” He will also take a tougher stance on Iran, having already criticized current German policy as “characterized by the idea of a cooperative government in Tehran” and declaring “this illusion has to be abandoned.”

Merz could, therefore, shape himself into a European leader without precedent: a Reaganite conservative and admirer of American democracy who nonetheless knows that the writing is on the wall as regards U.S. engagement with Europe. If that is the path he follows, we would be wise to hope that he succeeds.
Vietnam to Buy Two Spy Satellites from Israel
Israel Aerospace Industries has signed a deal to supply Vietnam's Military Intelligence with two spy satellites for $680 million to help Hanoi address China's provocations against its neighbors in the South China Sea.

IAI will supply Vietnam with an optical imagery photography satellite and a synthetic-aperture radar satellite that provides a picture of the ground even at night or through complete cloud cover.

In the past 15 years, Israel has sold a range of spy, communications, weather and research satellites to 23 countries including Italy, India, Morocco and Azerbaijan.
Evangelical leaders visiting Israel back annexation of Judea and Samaria
A group of Conservative American evangelical leaders visiting Jerusalem on Tuesday voiced support for Israeli sovereignty over Judea and Samaria—the biblical heartland of the Jewish people—in addition to the end of Hamas rule and presence in the Gaza Strip.

The remarks come as U.S. President Donald Trump is expected to make a decision on U.S. policy regarding the annexation of Judea and Samaria (also known as the West Bank), and after a prominent American Conservative group and major Christian group of broadcasters gave their backing to such a move.

Judea and Samaria are the counties in which many of the most famous Biblical stories take place, and are spiritually important to both the Jewish and Christian faiths.

“We strongly support and think it is imperative that Israeli sovereignty be expressed, extended and recognized over Judea and Samaria,” Ralph Reed, founder and chairman of the Faith and Freedom Caucus, told JNS. “Recognizing Israeli sovereignty is indispensable for Israel to provide security to its own people.”

Tony Perkins, a Southern Baptist pastor who serves as president of the Family Research Council, stated “we shouldn’t tell Israel what to do about anything.” Still, he affirmed that “we support you in your right to exercise sovereignty over Judea and Samaria.”

The faith leaders came for the Israel launch of the Conference of Christian Presidents, a new umbrella organization of pro-Israel faith groups modeled after the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. The Conference of Christian Presidents was established in Washington this past September.

The launch event at the event at the Friends of Zion Museum in Jerusalem included speeches by Bramnick, Perkins, and Reed, as well as Luke Moon, co-chair of the Conference of Christian Presidents and Executive Director of the Philos Project, and Lance Wellnau, a popular Evangelical podcaster.


Israel selects song ‘New Day Will Rise’ for Eurovision performance
Israeli public broadcaster Kan revealed on Monday that the country’s Eurovision song entry will be “New Day Will Rise”, a ballad written by the same songwriter behind last year’s winning entry “Hurricane.”

The new song, which will be performed by Eurovision entrant Yuval Raphael at the competition in Switzerland in May, is due for official release by Kan on 9 March. It reportedly contains lyrics in English, French and Hebrew and features verses from the Song of Songs, a biblical poem.

“New Day Will Rise” was written by Keren Peles, the writer of Israel’s Eurovision song choice in 2024, which was performed by Eden Golan and took fifth place in the competition, with musical arrangement and production by Tomer Biran.
Remembering Dore Gold - Visionary Scholar-Diplomat
Ambassador Dore Gold, among Israel's great scholar-diplomats, was a consummate scholar of Israel, the Middle East, and U.S.-Israel relations. His scholarly career in Israel began at Tel Aviv University's Jaffee Center, where he ran the U.S.-Israel Defense Project. He served as an advisor to then-Deputy Foreign Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the Madrid Conference in 1991.

He pioneered a revival of Gen. Yigal Alon's "defensible borders" concept and prevailed upon Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to include defensible borders in an American letter endorsing Israel's security needs provided by President George W. Bush on April 14, 2004, in exchange for Israel's withdrawal from Gaza.

Representing Israel at the UN, he summarized the UN's hypocrisy and moral bankruptcy in Tower of Babble: How the United Nations Has Fueled Global Chaos (2004). He hosted an event at the UN showing Israel's millennia of archaeological history with artifacts from the First and Second Temple periods proving the Jewish people's profound connection to the Land of Israel since antiquity.

He documented this in his 2007 bestseller The Fight for Jerusalem: Radical Islam, the West, and the Future of the Holy City. In 2009, his bestselling book, The Rise of Nuclear Iran: How Tehran Defies the West, warned Israel and the world about the Iranian regime's deceptive diplomacy.

Dore's visionary approach to Israel's national security, his scholarship, and diplomatic finesse was only matched by his consummate personal integrity. He displayed the qualities of a true gentleman of an era gone by. He also paved a new pathway for Israelis of American descent to play essential roles in Israel's national security and foreign policies and its international diplomacy.

We at the Jerusalem Center are dedicated to continuing his legacy of embracing Arab allies and securing Israel's borders while battling the disinformation, delegitimization and defamation of Israel.
Remembering Dore Gold: Scholar, Diplomat, and Defender of Israel
Years ago, I remember first encountering Dore Gold—with his distinctive moustache and slow, careful manner of speech—as a TV talking head presenting the Israeli perspective on the latest Middle East dust up. He was always paired with a Palestinian (the mendacious and ever-indignant Hanan Ashrawi was a favorite), and the interviewers always leaned in the anti-Israel direction. While there were others who played this part from time to time, Gold was the best: unflappable, precise, and logical. You could breathe a sigh of relief knowing that he was there to speak for Israel, which he did on television, on the dais at the United Nations, and in Arab capitols.

Gold died yesterday at the age of seventy-one. Born in Hartford, Connecticut, he was a scholar of the Arab world who served as Benjamin Netanyahu’s foreign-affairs adviser from 1996 to 1997, and then for two years as Israel’s ambassador to the UN (probably when I first caught him on TV), and as director general of Israel’s ministry of foreign affairs from 2015 to 2016. You can read and listen to his contributions to Mosaic here, but I’d also like to point you to this conversation with Tikvah’s chief executive officer Eric Cohen about the history of Jerusalem, recorded shortly after the U.S. decided to relocate its embassy.






Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon!

"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024)

PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

    
 

 



AddToAny

Printfriendly

EoZTV Podcast

Podcast URL

Subscribe in podnovaSubscribe with FeedlyAdd to netvibes
addtomyyahoo4Subscribe with SubToMe

search eoz

comments

Speaking

Speaking

translate

E-Book

For $18 donation








Sample Text

EoZ's Most Popular Posts in recent years

Search2

Hasbys!

Hasbys!

2019 Nobel Peace Prize nominee

Elder of Ziyon - حـكـيـم صـهـيـون



This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For 20 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.

Donate!

Donate to fight for Israel!

Monthly subscription:
Payment options


One time donation:

Follow EoZ on Twitter!

Interesting Blogs

Show All

Blog Archive

Copyright © Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News | Powered by Blogger
Blogger Templates