Wednesday, June 05, 2024


Disclaimer: the views expressed here are solely those of the author, weekly Judean Rose columnist Varda Meyers Epstein.

The Jpost Jack Lew interview had me at the title, “'Two-states is a defeat for Hamas,' US envoy Lew says, touting Saudi deal.” Had me fuming, that is, at Lew’s attempt to pull the wool over our eyes. “Court Jew,” I thought. “Jino,” I muttered (though naturally Lew self-defines as orthodox).

Yup. Lew’s message came through loud and clear, a script to which he, Lew, would stick without deviation:

👉🏻Two states for two peoples is a defeat for Hamas because it allows for a Jewish state to exist. And since Hamas wants Israel gone, two states would not serve its purpose.

No matter that the missive is a study in illogic, no matter how skewed, this is the message that Lew needs us to hear and absorb. That only two states can solve this problem, that two states for two people are the only way to beat Hamas—because fighting won’t do it, sez Lew.

He could say this lie once, Lew, and it would be enough for the masses. But he will say it here many times, to ensure the memo leaks into public discourse and soaks into our little public brains.

Happily, the interviewer of Lew, Tovah Lazaroff, doesn’t make the reader wait long for the first phase of the indoctrination to begin. The talking points we are meant to parrot are already there in the second paragraph:

“I don’t think Hamas wants two states,” Lew said. “The only time they indicate they want two states is when they’re trying to put a little bit of a patina of legitimacy around their real strategy, which is the elimination of the State of Israel.”

Missing here is the fact that the two-state solution is a win for no one. Not for Hamas of course, but also not for Israel, Gaza, or the people who live under the thumb of Abbas’ Palestinian Authority (clever name, that). No. Not one of the regional actors who would be a party to the two-state solution, actually want it. And that’s a fact, Jack.




Just as Hamas wants that “little bit” of legitimacy around its real strategy of exterminating the Jews, so too the people of Gaza, who continue to support Hamas, and the people who live under Abbas (who also support Hamas). They say they want a two-state solution because that’s how they get a foot in the door that is Jewish territory. It’s what they do. Then once they have a state on Jewish land, they carve away at the rest of Israel until whoops! Israel is gone. (Won’t happen.)

Then again, Israel also doesn’t want a two-state solution. Why on earth would we give this enemy any part of our (holy, indigenous) soil? What other nation would have this “solution” imposed on them? Must France cede Paris to Morocco? Must Canada cede Toronto to the United States of America?

I think not!

No. Only Israel, tiny Israel, is required to give up its land, holy to its Jewish inhabitants since before Mohammed was born—holy to the Jews whose presence the Holy Land was never lacking even when it meant they were forced to live hidden out of sight, in caves.


(photo: Judean Rose, with AI)

Aside from being compelled to “give up” land that will, by right, continue to belong to the Jewish people for all subsequent generations, the TSS asks us to legitimize the barbarians already installed alongside us, and embedded among us in our hills. It would be a gift to the evildoers—a gift that would leave Israelis far less safe than they were on October 7.

That’s all it is, the two-state solution. Not a defeat, a gift. A gift to Hamas, a gift to the PA, and a gift to all the people who voted them in. Two states mean more land for the Islamic caliphate—and Jewish land, at that—a seeming win for Islam over Judaism. (Won’t happen.)

Lew can flap his gums all he likes as the court Jew that he apparently is, but no one with a semblance of a brain will believe him. Not that it matters to the echo chamber. Chambers don’t have brains.

(photo: more Judean Rose AI experimentation.) 


Still, the echo chamber is soaking it all in as Lew continues to argue that the opposite of the truth is the truth, that the TSS is a defeat only for Hamas; that red is green; and big, old Brussels sprouts don’t smell when boiled at length:

[Netanyahu] has balked at talk of Palestinian statehood particularly in the aftermath of October 7. Both he and his government believe Palestinian statehood rewards terrorism and legitimizes that brutal style of attack in which people were raped, dismembered, and burned alive.

Lew said he believed that the opposite is true, particularly if Palestinian statehood is achieved through the framework of a larger Saudi deal, which would place Israel within a regional alliance against Iran.

“I think it’s a defeat for Hamas to talk about a two-state solution, which is why I think even out of the pain of October 7, there is a way to have this conversation, but it takes leadership,” Lew said.

Well, Jack Lew, Court Jew, maybe the echo chamber is fooled by your rhetoric, but thinking people are not. A rape victim, out of the pain of rape, will not give up half her bedroom to her rapist. The family of executed Jewish hostages, out of the pain, will not welcome an Arab state on their doorstep. And they don’t have to. None of us have to—no matter how many resolutions are issued by the talking heads at the antisemitic UN. And no matter how much Jack Lew insults Israel's duly elected leadership.

Of course, lest you question the efficacy of the TSS, let it be known to the echo chamber that Lew’s creds are impeccable. He alone knows what’s best for the Jews and the Arabs, because he’s served in three (count 'em) administrations that believed they knew what was best for Jews and Arabs. (They didn’t):

The United States has long believed that two states is the correct resolution to the conflict, Lew said, adding that “this is the third administration I’ve served that’s believe that. So it’s not a new idea.” He clarified that such a state would be a demilitarized one.

Note that last part. The Arabs won’t actually have a state, because Lew won’t let them have an army. In Lew’s Arab dreamland, there will be no terrorists and no army. And of course, by extension, no more weapons to the Jews, either:

Imagine there's no countries

It isn't hard to do

Nothing to kill or die for

And no religion too

Imagine all the people living life in peace


(photo: yet MORE Judean Rose AI experimentation)


Here, Lew inserts the knife—peace? Never mind what Dr. Edy Cohen calls “the consistent and enduring Palestinian rejection of any and all peace initiatives with Israel, most recently the ‘Deal of the Century,’” It’s all up to the Jews who, at the moment, have closed their minds off to the idea sleeping well at night:

No one expects Israel “to decide on two states next week or next month,” but it has to be open to the conversation, he said.

In other words, Lew wants you to know on behalf of the Biden administration, as the court Jew he is, that the Jews are completely closed up in their own little selfish Jewish mindsets crying, “Ours. All ours!” totally unable to think outside the box; to be creative; to share nicely what they have with “others,” barbarians who swear they will perpetrate endless October 7ths. (Won’t happen.)

“The basic orientation” should be: is this “a win or a loss for Hamas? Is it a win or a loss for Iran?” Lew said.

How kind of Lew to orient us all, in particular the Jews, who after all are oriental. Thanks to Lew’s largesse of spirit, we now understand that the elimination of Hamas depends solely on Israel’s retreat from Gaza. If only Israel will only stop killing the terrorists and talk to them instead—give them land—peace will reign over the entire region:

[To] arrive at a deal, Lew said, there must be a cessation of hostilities between Hamas and Israel, particularly given that the war has entered a phase, where success might better be achieved through diplomacy than on the battlefield.

Never mind that there was a ceasefire on October 7, and that it was Hamas who broke it; clearly it is only Israel’s close-mindedness, its unwillingness to compromise that prevents peace, now. That is, if you don’t count the more than 8,000 Jews expelled from Gaza—which apparently, Lew does not.




Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 



From Ian:

Seth Mandel: Biden Tries To Take Victory Off the Table
President Biden made clear in a speech today that he wants the war in Gaza to end without Hamas’s eradication. Unveiling the outline of a ceasefire agreement, Biden said that “the people of Israel should know they can make this offer without any further risk to their own security because they have devastated Hamas forces over the past eight months. At this point Hamas no longer is capable of carrying out another October 7.”

Thus have the goals shifted, although that process began in December with Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s comments that the U.S. “will continue to support Israel’s efforts to do everything possible to ensure that Hamas cannot repeat the horrors of October 7. And that means, among other things, that Hamas cannot remain responsible for governance in Gaza and it cannot retain the capacity to repeat those attacks.”

This was the Biden administration’s way of telling the public what it had told Israeli leaders earlier that day in December: The U.S. would no longer support the original goal of Hamas’s eradication.

Today, President Biden made that point himself. “Indefinite war in pursuit of an unidentified notion of total victory will only bog down Israel in Gaza,” the president admonished, “draining the economic, military, and human resources and furthering Israel’s isolation in the world.”

According to Biden, Israel’s long-professed characterization of victory isn’t possible. Continuing its operations in Gaza “will not bring an enduring defeat of Hamas.” He described a path that instead would see Israel out of Gaza and becoming part of “a regional security network” that ideally would include Saudi Arabia. Meanwhile Gaza will be rebuilt with the help of the international community “in a manner that does not allow Hamas to rearm.” So, again, the president envisions Hamas continuing to exist. Of course, “Israel will always have the right to defend itself against threats to security and to bring those responsible for October 7 to justice.” Translation: If at some point in the future Yahya Sinwar turns up at the Super-Pharm in Tel Aviv to pick up some Advil, go ahead and arrest him.
Jonathan Schanzer: The Policies That Are Killing Israeli Soldiers
Biden Administration policies have put Israeli soldiers in greater danger. On the eve of the Muslim holiday of Ramadan, in March, the White House warned Israel to halt its military advance on Rafah as the IDF was on the cusp of destroying Hamas, defying the predictions of most Middle East experts. When Ramadan was over, the White House moved the goal posts.

The U.S. began to warn of a potential humanitarian disaster in Gaza. The State Department went so far as to suggest that Israel could be guilty of war crimes in Rafah. The White House even threatened to halt the provision of ammunition to Israel. Never mind that Israel had kept the civilian to militant casualty count lower than any of America's previous engagements in Iraq or Afghanistan.

Then, in mid-May, a major lawfare campaign against Israel kicked into high gear. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) charges of siege warfare leveled at Israel would likely have never been aired had the State Department not first suggested it was occurring in the first place.

The cumulative effect of all of this over the last three months has prompted the IDF to halt its advance in Rafah, and to move much slower than it originally anticipated. These three months of relative quiet afforded Hamas the time to prepare the lethal booby traps and IEDs that are now killing Israeli soldiers.
Melanie Phillips: Wake up, Americans!
This sustained Hezbollah onslaught shows that the war against Israel is not being waged merely by Hamas terrorists in Gaza. It’s a war of extermination against Israel by Iran and its proxies on no fewer than seven fronts. The attacks by Hezbollah and the threat of far worse from those forces are intolerable.

But if you’re reading this in Britain or America, the chances are you’ll have read virtually nothing about any of this. I can’t see any coverage of these terrible fires in any mainstream media outlets other than a solitary mention today by CNN.

The escalation means that Israel will have to deal with this once and for all. Israelis are bracing for an imminent major war against Hezbollah in Lebanon. Until now, Israel’s defence forces have been responding to these attacks in limited fashion in order to avoid a major escalation, which could see thousands of Israeli civilians killed. But no country can live like this, and Israel has done so for eight months.

Yet if it now takes the gloves off in Lebanon, stand by for hysterical condemnation by the western media which has paid virtually no attention to the months of Hezbollah attacks — and consequently will viciously defame Israel once again as the aggressive warmonger, in yet another big lie designed to demonise, delegitimise and destroy it. While Israel fights for its life, the western media carries out the strategy designed to annihilate it by the enemies of humanity.

The carnage in northern Israel must also be laid at the door of the Biden administration. Shortly after the October 7 pogrom in southern Israel, following which Hezbollah started attacking the north, Israel was about to launch a pre-emptive strike on the Iranian backed “Party of God” to neutralise the fearsome threat from Lebanon — but the Biden administration forced it to abort that mission.

Since then, the US has persistently undermined Israel’s attempt to neutralise Hamas in Gaza. The perfidy of the Biden administration in its attempt to ensure that Hamas survives and Israel is left unable to defend itself against genocidal attack has now reached yet another crescendo.
Uh-oh!


The Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor wrote in April, "It is estimated that Israel has dropped more than 70,000 tons of explosives on the Gaza Strip ."

This little factoid has been suddenly picked up by anti-Israel media in the past couple couple of days.

If this is true, and if you accept the Hamas claims of 36,000 Gazans killed during the war, that means that Israel has dropped nearly two tons of bombs - 4,000 pounds - for every single person killed.

That's an SUV filled with explosives dropped on the head of every dead Gazan.

While making the argument that Israel is engaging in "genocide," the NGO is in fact proving the opposite. While they do not indicate their source for the 70,000 ton statistic, if true, it indicates a stunningly poor aim for a country that is practicing "genocide."

Put it another way, that is 70 pounds of explosives for every Gazan man, woman and child. A hand  grenade, which can kill several people, weighs about a pound.

That is a hell of an inefficient genocide.  

The source of the statistic is not mentioned. And Euro-Med is known to lie, constantly. Even in that same article, they said that Israel had killed 10,000 more people than even Hamas claimed at the time.

Which means that their source is either Hamas or a random number generator.

(h/t kweansmom)






Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Wednesday, June 05, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
From The Washington Post:

Columbia University officials agreed on Tuesday to provide safe passage for students on campus in a settlement reached with a Jewish student who sued on behalf of those who switched to online learning in April in the midst of intense pro-Palestinian protests.

The school is creating a “Safe Passage Liaison” who will have authority to open alternative entrances and exits to students with existing 24-hour security escorts, if needed, under the terms of the settlement. 

“We think peaceful protest is a constructive way to solve situations,” said Jay Edelson, an attorney for the plaintiff, but recently extremists have tried to take over campuses, and “push out, figuratively and literally, people who they deem are on the wrong side.” That has created situations that have turned frightening, he said.

As protests intensified, some Jewish students at Columbia complained they were the targets of antisemitic threats, according to the settlement and interviews with students.

“We got a focused security monitor who’s going to be able to serve as the eyes, ears and voice for anyone on campus who feels unsafe,” Edelson said. “That is a major win.”
No, this is a travesty.

Jews who want to feel safe need to call up a hotline and get escorted to alternative building entrances to not be attacked? That is considered a win?

Imagine if black children who want to attend integrated schools still needed to be accompanied by escorts of US Marshals, like Ruby Bridges in 1960, for their safety today.


It was a necessary stage to integrate the school at the time, to normalize the idea of a black child having equal rights. But if people of color required escorts today to go to class,  everyone would recognize that as racism and unacceptable. 

A year ago, Jewish students at Columbia had free access to the entire campus. Now they don't. Forcing them to have to change their way of life to protest those who are attacking them is not progress; it is pandering to the antisemitic mob.

An escort might make things slightly better for individuals who need help at the moment, but it misses the entire point of what equal rights actually means. 

I cannot believe I need to say this, but: All students should have the right to use every space on campus, every entrance to buildings, equally.  Any protest that limits those rights is not, by definition, "peaceful protest" or "free speech" - it is intimidation.

The protesters who are shutting parts of campus off to people they don't like are the ones who need to be forced to change their actions to make the campus safe for all, not the victims. 

Not to mention what would happen when this is implemented. Some students would resent this public "protection" of Jews, saying that the Jews are being treated better than everyone else. Some Palestinian students might performatively call the escorts to go into Hillel to intimidate Jewish or Zionist events. 

Any supposed solution that enforces unequal treatment of some students is, by definition, discriminatory.  It is the campus environment that must change, not the habits of those who are being attacked.






Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Wednesday, June 05, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
We've become almost inured to stories about anti-Israel rallies worldwide and how the protesters abuse Jews who pass nearby. However, this story that flew under the radar in Melbourne, Australia, that went largely unreported, is beyond appalling.

On May 19, there was a rally against antisemitism, called "No Hate, Mate,"  held in Melbourne attended by thousands of Jews and others.  

There was a counterprotest of about 150 people with keffiyehs and signs calling for "intifada."


Yes, they were protesting a demonstration against antisemitism. 

The Australian (paywalled) reports that while police tried to separate the two groups, elderly attendees, those in wheelchairs  and parents with prams couldn't climb the stairs from a train station near the rally and had to pass through the haters from a different route from the north. 
One woman described her fellow elderly female friend being surrounded by pro-Palestine protesters, who had their faces covered, “and kicked with great force repeatedly in her calves, punched in her shoulders and abused using the foulest of language.”

The woman said her friend was “spat at repeatedly” and sustained a bleeding calf and upper body bruising.

Another woman told of attempting to make her way through the pro-Palestine crowd with her adult daughter, who has cerebral palsy and uses a wheelchair, and her daughter’s carer.

“We were surrounded by an angry mob that encircled us. One man screamed at me and his nose could almost touch mine. They stole (my daughter)’s Israeli flag from the back of her wheelchair,” the mother and grandmother said.

“(My daughter)’s carer was traumatised and sobbing at the end of this ordeal.”

Another woman described being surrounded by pro-Palestine protesters yelling abuse as she attempted to make her way through the crowd using a walking frame, and an elderly couple with walking sticks spoke of being elbowed and called “f***ing murderers,” while other rally attendees said they had been punched in the jaw and the chest respectively, and others spoke of being kicked, poked and pushed to the ground.

Many Never Again is Now attendees spoke of being verbally abused, with some called “f...ing baby killers”, “Zionist pigs”, “murderers”, “genocide supporters” and “Nazis”, and others told they were “whores” in Arabic, that they “should be killed,” and that a “second Holocaust” was coming for them.
At the time, only a limited number of these incidents were reported in the press:
One woman was in tears as she tried to enter the pro-Israel rally with a disabled loved one, while counter-protesters yelled that they were “baby murderers”.

One first person account was published in Australian Jewish News: Australian Jewish News: 

On Sunday the 19th of May, my mum, a friend and I went to the Never Again is Now rally in front of the steps of parliament. When we left Parliament station we heard drums and at first thought that it might be the rally. It turned out to have been a responding pro-Palestinian demonstration of around 150 people between us and the rally we were going to. Realising that we would have to go through them to get to the rally, I felt a sudden fear which was only amplified by hearing them chanting “Intifada”  over and over again. As we approached the demonstration we attempted to keep a low profile. Despite this as we walked through the corridor of cones set up by the police I was yelled at by a young woman who asked me if I was a nazi telling me that if I was a nazi I should go through gesturing to the Never Again is Now rally she then shouted at me as I walked away that I was committing a holocaust against Palestinians. I thought to myself how could I be called a nazi by the person calling to globalise the intifada, practically calling for the death of all Jews.  
This is pure antisemitism, not "pro-Palestinian activism."  It is happening every day. 

And children are being indoctrinated to ensure an entire generation of more haters, as this photo from "Free Palestine Melbourne" taken that day shows.



(h/t Jill)





Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Wednesday, June 05, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
A former American president said that Gazans were being "starved to death" in a speech at the American University in Cairo. 


The former president was Jimmy Carter.  

The New York Times reported on April 18, 2008:
In Cairo on Thursday, former President Jimmy Carter met with Hamas leaders from Gaza and spoke at the American University, Reuters reported. He criticized Israel’s action, after Hamas took over Gaza by force last June, to allow only basic supplies to be moved into the territory.

Mr. Carter said Palestinians in Gaza were being “starved to death,” receiving fewer calories a day than people in the poorest parts of Africa. “It’s an atrocity what is being perpetrated as punishment on the people in Gaza,” he said.

Carter repeated the accusation in 2009:

“To me, the most grievous circumstance is the maltreatment of the people in Gaza, who are literally starving and have no hope at this time."

 Sixteen years of starvation with practically no deaths has to be some sort of  a record. 




Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

Tuesday, June 04, 2024

  • Tuesday, June 04, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
Ian is still not feeling well, so I'm pinch-hitting.

A Columbia alumnus snubbed his alma mater and anonymously donated a staggering $260 million of his fortune to one of Israel’s largest universities.

Bar-Ilan, the public research university that is getting the gift, described the philanthropist as a “North American Jew and graduate of Columbia University who was active in World War II.”

It said Monday that the donor sees Bar-Ilan as “best able to undertake the great task of expanding science-based technological resilience in Israel.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday said that US President Joe Biden had disclosed only part of the proposal aimed at achieving a ceasefire in Gaza and securing the release of Israeli hostages, and added that he had not agreed to end Israel’s military operations against Hamas.

“Biden omitted one crucial detail regarding the second stage” of the deal, Netanyahu said. “Israel didn’t agree to end the war, but only to ‘discuss’ its end,” Netanyahu said, adding that such a discussion would occur after the hostages were returned and “only on our terms.”

“Despite what President Biden said, the number of hostages that will be released in the first phase has not yet been agreed upon. There are many details in the deal, and the war will not end without us achieving all of our objectives. We will not give up on absolute victory,” he said.
Roughly four years ago, Mondaire Jones and Jamaal Bowman made history together. Young, left-leaning Democrats, they won hard-fought primaries in neighboring districts to become the first Black men ever to represent New York’s Westchester County in Congress.

Now, they find themselves deeply at odds over the Israel-Hamas war, a break so sharp that Mr. Jones vowed on Monday to help defeat Mr. Bowman in the Democratic primary on June 25 and endorse his opponent, George Latimer.

An Iranian general has been killed in a suspected Israeli air strike near the Syrian city of Aleppo, nearly two months after the Islamic republic warned it would retaliate against attacks on its interests.

Saeed Abyar, described as a military adviser, was targeted in a bombing raid on Monday morning, resulting in the death of several civilians and “material losses”, according to Syria’s official Sana news agency.
In the aftermath of the devastating October 7th massacre, a surge of anti-Israel sentiment and egregious anti-Semitism has swept across the United States. As misinformation and hate speech proliferate, a group of courageous individuals and organizations has risen to combat these dangerous trends. These intrepid defenders of justice have taken a stand against anti-Israel propaganda, Hamas propaganda, and the growing manifestations of anti-Semitism, displaying remarkable bravery and determination.

These advocates face significant risks and challenges, yet they persist in their mission to protect the integrity of Israel and ensure the safety and dignity of Jewish communities. Through public advocacy, educational initiatives, legal action, and community support, they are pushing back against the tide of vociferous Jew hatred. Their efforts are not only about defending Israel but also about upholding the principles of truth, justice, and human rights in the face of growing adversity.

Leaders of European Jewish communities single out EU top diplomat Josep Borrell for criticism, accusing him in a resolution of adding to the bloc’s antisemitism problem by excessively criticizing Israel.

Borrell has demonstrated “a clear and repeated anti-Israel bias that has been a significant contributory factor to the ongoing antisemitism and the vilification of the state of Israel as a whole in the European public space,” reads a resolution unanimously passed by more than 100 delegates from European Jewish communities at a conference on fighting antisemitism organized in Amsterdam by the European Jewish Association.

Borrell is on record as saying that Israel is deliberately causing famine in Gaza, a claim that Israel rejects, and has said that Israel “created” Hamas, a claim that his critics, including the Portuguese security analyst João Lemos Esteves, say is fueling antisemitic conspiracy theories.

 Leading rabbi warns mass exodus of Jews from Europe to Israel may be imminent

EJA Chairman Rabbi Menachem Margolin opened the meeting with a stark message. "We are in a fight for the continuation of Jewish life in Europe," he said. "Jews wearing traditional clothing or displaying mezuzahs on their doors are facing relentless harassment. Jewish students are receiving threats on their lives and being excluded from university courses, while hate graffiti defaces Jewish homes, synagogues and cemeteries without any deterrent."

"Over the next two days, we will formulate plans to combat antisemitism on all fronts: political, legal, public and by enhancing community and personal security," Rabbi Margolin added. "However, this may not be enough. Therefore, Israel urgently needs to develop a practical contingency plan to welcome European Jews. Unfortunately, this is no longer a hypothetical situation but a real existential threat that European governments are either failing to address or are unwilling to tackle with the necessary determination."

For some college protesters, attacking Israel — and American support for Israel — might seem new and trendy. Yet, both the CIA and big oil were precisely doing that, decades ago, forming alliances with anti-American dictators, antisemitic war criminals, the press, Protestant groups, academics, university administrators, and fringe Jewish groups claiming to represent “what’s best” for American Jewry.

Residents and local authorities in northern Israel demanded Tuesday that the government take clear action to restore security, as bushfires sparked by Hezbollah rockets launched from Lebanon spread across large swaths of territory, with emergency services straining to control the blazes.

A spokesperson for Kiryat Shmona, where fires lapped overnight at the outskirts of the evacuated border city, lamented that the government was failing to provide even the most basic level of security for residents.
This past Memorial Day, as Americans honoured their war dead, the Biden administration was running interference for an Iranian regime whose Supreme Leader has described “death to America” as his official state policy. A report in the day’s Wall Street Journal described how the US was “pressing European allies to back off plans to rebuke Iran for advances in its nuclear programme”. This followed a confidential report by the International Atomic Energy Agency that assessed Iran has increased its stockpile of enriched uranium to more than 30 times the limit set in the 2015 nuclear deal — enough to produce three to four nuclear weapons within a week, according to experts.

Theoretically, the news should have troubled officials in Washington, who often still speak as if they oppose the proliferation of nuclear weapons to rogue states that vow to destroy the US-led international order. So why, then, did the US block the effort led by its allies France and England to censure Iran? For the same underlying reason that has motivated White House policy since October 7: The Biden administration sees Iran as America’s main partner in the Middle East and the lynchpin of US grand strategy.
The U.N. Watch NGO on Thursday accused the Human Rights Council’s special rapporteur on the Palestinian territories of “gross violations of U.N. rules and professional ethics.”

In a complaint filed to U.N. Secretary General António Guterres and High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk, U.N. Watch alleges that Francesca Albanese accepted honorariums and payments from activist and advocacy groups, in violation of the U.N. code of conduct.

Albanese has a documented history of making antisemitic comments and justifying terrorism against Israel. Her denial that Hamas’s Oct. 7 massacre was based on the terrorist group’s hatred of Jews was rebuked by the French government, which called the remarks “scandalous” and “a disgrace.” The German government called her comments “appalling.”

After backlash, Vancouver comics festival apologizes for excluding Jewish artist over IDF service

A Vancouver comics festival apologized to a Jewish artist it had banned over her past Israeli military service and a Seattle museum announced it was recommitting to an exhibit on antisemitism that prompted a staff walkout, in two reversals of arts-world sanctions connected to the Israel-Hamas war.

Both the Vancouver Comic Arts Festival and the Wing Luke Museum had faced significant backlash over the actions they took because of pro-Palestinian activism. 

The Biden administration’s massive program of “environmental justice” grants appears designed to empower extremist groups.
In a remarkable work of reporting, Park MacDougald recently traced the tangled roots of organizations backing pro-jihad protests, both on and off campuses. These include Antifa and other networks of anonymous anarchists, along with “various communist and Marxist-Leninist groups, including the Maoist Revolutionary Communist Party, the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL), and the International ANSWER coalition,” MacDougald writes. Higher up the food chain, we find groups openly supported by America’s growing class of super-rich tech execs or the anti-capitalist heirs of great fortunes. For example, retired tech mogul Neville Roy Singham, who is married to Code Pink founder Jodie Evans, funds The People’s Forum, a lavish Manhattan resource center for far-left groups. As the Columbia protests intensified, the center urged members to head uptown to “support our students.” Following the money trail of other protest groups, MacDougald finds connections to the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the Ford Foundation, and—surprising no one—the George Soros-backed Tides Foundation.

Of course, the current wave of anti-Israel protests also involves alliances with pro-Hamas organizations such as Students for Justice in Palestine. Last November, Jonathan Schanzer of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies testified to the House Ways and Means Committee that SJP and similar groups have deep ties to global terrorist organizations, including Hamas.

For many keffiyeh-wearing protestors, however, a recently professed concern for Palestinians is just the latest in a long list of causes they believe justify taking over streets and college quads. In Unherd, Mary Harrington dubs this medley of political beliefs the “omnicause,” writing that “all contemporary radical causes seem somehow to have been absorbed into one.” Today’s leftist activists share an interlocking worldview that sees racism, income inequality, trans intolerance, climate change, alleged police violence, and Israeli-Palestinian conflicts all as products of capitalism and “colonialism.” Therefore, the stated rationale for any individual protest is a stand-in for the real battle: attacking Western society and its institutions.
Until Hamas’ massacre against Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, the Coastal Road terror attack was the most lethal in Israel’s history. Fatah terrorists from Lebanon hijacked a bus full of Israeli civilians on vacation and murdered 37, of whom 12 were children. Arch-terrorist Abu Jihad planned and supervised the attack, which was led by female terrorist Dalal Mughrabi.

The PA has praised Abu Jihad for orchestrating the murder of at least 125 Israelis, and Palestinian Media Watch has documented how the PA has turned him into a role model for Palestinian society. Posthumously, PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas awarded Abu Jihad the Star of Honor.

Last week, the PA yet again cemented its view of Abu Jihad as a hero and admirable figure for Palestinians by inaugurating a hall in Ramallah named after him. 
This, is really what the anti-Israel protests that erupted in the wake of the Hamas massacre of October 7, the attitude to the war, and the constant criticism Israel has faced since before the blood had a chance to dry have been about. 
With his carefully coiffed hair, baritone voice, and grandiose manner of speaking, David Levy – who passed away Sunday at age 86 – made his presence felt on this country’s political stage for more than three decades.

From 1969, when he first entered the Knesset as a member of the Gahal party, to 2006, when he finally left as a Likud member, Levy held numerous senior ministerial positions, including foreign minister – a post he held three separate times – and deputy prime minister.

All immigrants can appreciate the difficulty and impressive nature of the following feat: Within 12 years of aliyah and without even a high school diploma, he became a Knesset member. Two decades after moving here – in 1977 – he was instrumental in forging an alliance between Mizrachi voters and the Herut party that realigned and shaped Israeli politics for generations.
CBC The Current Shares Hamas Propaganda On Rafah Tent Fires, Host Matt Galloway Asks If Canada Should Expel Israel’s Ambassador To Canada

The main theme of the 19-minute segment surrounded a May 26 Israeli airstrike in southern Gaza, targeting senior Hamas terrorists. At the same time, a large fire was recorded in a tented area, prompting Hamas to claim without evidence that Israel was responsible.

Rather than examining the evidence, host Galloway accepts Hamas’ allegations, hook, line and sinker.

Galloway told listeners that “an Israeli airstrike hit a camp for displaced Palestinians in Rafah that ignited a deadly fire and killed dozens of people,” as if it were an established fact, when it is decidedly not.

 


Bibi at 28:





Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Tuesday, June 04, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
Besides the daily, quite exact-sounding casualty numbers, Hamas also regularly releases other Gaza statistics.

 One of them is the number of people missing, presumably under rubble.

In November, the number rose from 6,500 to 7,000. It briefly spiked to 7,500 before settling in at exactly 7,000 in  every single report from December to the end of April.  Then, days later, it jumped up another 3,000 to 10,000, where it has stayed since then.

Here's the chart.

Keep in mind that there is no mechanism for reporting missing people. Yet Hamas claimed that from December to March 70% of the missing were women and children. If they know that detail, that means they should know the exact count 

Hamas dropped that 70% claim in April but then decided that the 7,000 number was getting old and chose to add a few thousand more, even though there were no major air raids with hundreds of people stranded under rubble in that timeframe.

The UN's OCHA dutifully transcribed Hamas' made up numbers, showing the rise from 7,000 to 10,000 missing between May 1 and May 3. 


In this case, the additional 3,000 was laundered  through a circuitous route. 

OCHA is quoting the GMO (Gaza Media Office) and PC (Protection Cluster.) 

The Protection Cluster sounds like a legitimate UN organization, so what was its source?  It was OCHA again! OCHA on May 1 quoted Palestinian Civil Defense that 10,000 were suddenly missing - which is, of course, Hamas! 

So the UN OCHA quoted another UN agency, which got the numbers from OCHA itself, which got them from Hamas. But this way it sounds like they got them from a reliable source. 

It is not the first time we've seen the UN play this particular game. 







Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Tuesday, June 04, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon


From TRTWorld:
The Columbia Law Review suspended its website after publishing an article on the Nakba...

The article, "Toward Nakba As A Legal Concept," was written by Harvard Law School student and Palestinian human rights lawyer Rabea Eghbariah.

What Columbia Law Review's website looks like now
Seven editors involved in the article disclosed that over the weekend, members of the journal's board of directors urged the leadership of the law review, which consists of students, to delay or potentially retract its publication.

Upon the editors' rejection of this request, the board opted to shut down the entire website. The editors who opposed the directives of the board of directors have reportedly been asked to step down now.
The law review article is 100 pages of anti-Israel and antisemitic agitprop dedicated to the idea that the "nakba" is so unique, so utterly evil, that simple terms lik e"occupation" and "apartheid" and genocide" do not do it justice, and it requires an entirely new legal category in the pantheon of heinous war crimes.

The law does not possess the language that we desperately need to accurately capture the totality of the Palestinian condition. From occupation to apartheid and genocide, the most commonly applied legal concepts rely on abstraction and analogy to reveal particular facets of subordination. This Article introduces Nakba as a legal concept to resolve this tension. ... This Article proposes to distinguish apartheid, genocide, and Nakba as different, yet overlapping, modalities of crimes against humanity.

The target of the article is really Zionism itself. And the author is not above comparing Palestinians fleeing in 1948 to the Holocaust - and saying  Zionism uses the Holocaust to justify the fictional genocide of Palestinians.

Historically and conceptually, the 1948 Nakba has existed at the juncture of the Holocaust and Apartheid South Africa. The concept of Nakba thus provides an opportunity to generate an independent framework that structures the legal questions at play and moves beyond simple analogy. Recognizing Nakba not only bestows a belated recognition upon its primary victims and allows us to imagine liberatory, egalitarian, and just futures but also reinforces, rather than undermines, the universal lessons of the Holocaust by recognizing the grave dangers of situations in which victimhood is used and abused to victimize others.

...Zionism must be understood in terms of the Nakba it generated. Destructive ideologies mirror the calamities they produce and often become defined from the perspective of their victims. Just as Nazi ideology produced the Holocaust and Afrikaner nationalism generated apartheid, Zionism similarly birthed the Nakba. 

Indeed, the entire article is an exercise in Holocaust jealousy. The subtext is that if Jews have a unique term to describe the Nazi mass-producing murder machine, then Palestinians - who are the ultimate victims of all historical wrongs - certainly must lay claim to their own unique framework, one that international law must recognize as a distinct and particularly heinous crime.

Just for context, more Jews were deliberately murdered every single month during the four years of the Holocaust then the number of Palestinians killed since 1948, including the current war. His comparison is obscene, ahistorical, false and antisemitic.

And what, exactly, is the crime of "Nakba"? It is Zionism itself.

Against this background, this Article advances an understanding of Zionism as Nakba. Typically, Zionism is recognized primarily as a movement of Jewish self-determination without attending to its key material consequence. The Nakba, which is the material corroboration and culmination of the ideals espoused by Zionism, leaves no room for doubt as to Zionism’s key feature. If before 1948 one could still arguably distinguish between Zionism and its commitment to expulsion or consider the tensions between the colonial and national facets of the movement, then after 1948—and certainly since then—this attempt cannot be understood as anything but an excuse for Zionism and an attempt to salvage Zionism from the atrocities it has committed. To recognize Zionism as Nakba is to take seriously the magnitude and mechanisms of Palestinian displacement as well as to situate that process within its historical context, namely European antisemitism, the destruction of European Jewry, and the supremacist claims made by European Zionists on Palestinian land. The Nakba has emanated from Zionist praxis and provided an irrefutable material instantiation of Zionist ideology that must inform how we define it.

Nakba is Zionism, and Zionism is, according to Eghbariah, the ultimate form of displacement of a people. 

He brings pages of evidence that Zionism is inherently committed tothe ethnic cleansing of all non-Jews from the river to the sea. But footnotes do not prove a point - a single counterexample is enough to disprove this thesis.

Such as the fact that Israel has offered Palestinians a state numerous times on the very lands that Jew claim as their historic homeland. It is impossible to make that fact fit in with this definition of Zionism as inherently eliminationalist - was Ben Gurion not a Zionist? 

Or, for example, the large amount of documentation that Jewish leaders pleaded with Arabs not to flee Haifa in 1948. It wasn't the Jews who expelled them - they all left because their leaders abandoned them and their fellow Arabs told them to leave so they could return, victorious. If Zionism is defined as displacement, how could Zionists try to stop Arabs from leaving?

The huge number of footnotes obscure more than they reveal. Holocaust revisionists like to use footnotes, too. But when you ignore all counter-evidence that counters your argument, you are not writing in good faith to begin with.

This article wants to create an entirely new legal concept, just against Jews. Doing that requires an extraordinary amount of proof. The author, instead, cherry picks what he wants and doesn't address the truth. It has no business being published anywhere, let alone in a prestigious Ivy League law review.







Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 



  • Tuesday, June 04, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon


The Book of Ruth, which Jews read on the Shavuot holiday next week, starts off with something that seems unlikely on the surface::

AND IT came to pass in the days when the judges judged, that there was a famine in the land. And a certain man of Bethlehem in Judah went to sojourn in the field of Moab, he, and his wife, and his two sons.,And the name of the man was Elimelech, and the name of his wife Naomi, and the name of his two sons Mahlon and Chilion, Ephrathites of Beth-lehem in Judah. And they came into the field of Moab, and continued there
Moab was not far away - most of Moab was within 25 miles/40 kilometers from Bethlehem. 

How could there be a famine in Judea and food be plentiful in Moab?

The fact that there was a significant famine has been proven by archaeologists, by examining pollen samples from the time period. Scientists from Tel Aviv University and Germany’s University of Bonn found evidence of a major drought between 1250-1100 BCE in the Levant, right in that same time period of the Judges. But that only makes the question stronger: how could there have been food in Moab? Did they have a Joseph-like figure to store grain during times of plenty?

The current issue of Biblical Archaeological Review has a sidebar to its story about Moab, written by archaeologists studying the region of Moab in modern-day Jordan,  that sheds light on the answer:
Our investigations at Balu‘a may have revealed the answer. The land around the site is quite fertile, perhaps in part because of the volcanic soils of the area (thanks to nearby Jebel Shihan). Soils derived from basalt can be rich in minerals that make it quite fertile and productive for dry farming. Preliminary archaeobotanical analysis confirms the presence of barley, wheat, lentils, and peas in the site’s Iron Age occupation levels. So, although the biblical author does not specifically identify the area around Balu‘a, his general knowledge of Moab’s relatively stable agricultural food supply seems to underlie the setting of the story.
That's pretty neat! 




Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Tuesday, June 04, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
Here is a December press release from the Climate Justice Alliance:

NATIONAL – Today the EPA announced $600 million in grants through the 2023 Environmental Justice Thriving Communities Grantmaking (EJ TCGM) Program. The EJ TCGM Program was created to reduce barriers to the application process and increase the efficiency of the awards process for environmental justice grants. 

Climate Justice Alliance (CJA) was selected to receive a $50 million grant for its UNITE-EJ (United Network for Impact, Transformation, & Equity in Environmental Justice Communities) application and to serve as a National Grantmaker for EJ TCCGM to provide support to the Western United States (EPA Regions 8-10).
(The $600 million is only a small part of the windfall the EPA received from the Inflation Reduction Act.)

The Climate Justice Alliance explains what they want to do with the money:
In this role, UNITE-EJ will provide technical support to regional grantmakers and grassroots organizations, as well as serve as a regrantor of tens of millions of dollars in public funds to environmental justice communities over the next three years. As firm believers that those closest to the problems hold innovative and visionary solutions, we trust in the wisdom and leadership of EJ communities to effectively deploy these resources to the projects that need them most. 
On the very top of the CJA webpage is a link to a section called Free Palestine. 



What does Gaza have to do with "climate justice"? Nothing at all.  But millions of taxpayer dollars dollars are going towards creating that link. 

It gets worse. Climate Justice Alliance is actively pro-Hamas.

That webpage encourages people to download  "Palestine Art for Protests." One of the posters they want people to use glorifies the October 7 massacre with a depiction of the Hamas bulldozer breaking the fence in Gaza to allow thousands of people to murder, rape and kidnap Israelis and Jews.



One of the organizations that CJA is passing millions of dollars to in the name of "environmental justice" is the NDN Collective, whose mission statement does not even mention the environment. They are explicitly antisemitic, claiming that Israel is an exercise in Jewish supremacy identical to white supremacy.
We should not treat the struggles we face against zionism, white supremacy, and imperialism as separate from one another, because they act as one to oppress and eliminate us. Only through solidarity and fighting for justice, can we create change for our people and Mother Earth. Understanding that the zionist settler project requires the elimination, removal, banishment, and identity theft of Palestinians on their homelands is the same formula that u.s. settlers use in our communities. zionism has a few founding narratives: the idea that those who develop the land own the land; claims that israel is a superior nation granted by God and ordained by a higher power to Jewish people alone; and that Palestine was barren just seven decades ago. 
In fact, NDN Collective's slogan is "Defend. Develop. Decolonize."  They spent money to send members to the various anti-Israel encampments nationwide.  

The "decolonize" part means to dismantle the United States itself, especially the military.  And they want to do it with US funding.


Another grantee from CJA ia the Fund for Frontline Power, one of whose own grantees is the Arab Resource and Organizing Center, which calls President Biden a racist, Zionist imperialist.  "President Biden and his administration have had the power to stop this genocide at any point in the last 9 months. Whether driven by commitments to U.S. imperialism, by his own racism or Zionism – or all three – Biden’s words and deeds aid and abet a fascist genocidal regime. "

The Biden administration is giving tens of millions of dollars to groups that are actively trying to dismantle and  both Israel and the United States. 

Some of this was highlighted by U.S. Senator Shelley Moore Capito in a press statement two weeks ago, and the media ignored it. 


I'm afraid this may be only the tip of the iceberg on how antisemitic, anti-Israel and anti-American organizations are leveraging US funding and grants to actively fight against what America stands for.  There seems to be little accountability for the direct recipients of the Inflation Reduction Act and the EPA, and there is no oversight whatsoever as to who they give their own grants to in turn. 




Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Tuesday, June 04, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon



A month ago, the UN said there is a "full blown famine" in northern Gaza. AP described the situation:
According to the IPC, an area is considered to be in famine when three things occur: 20% of households have an extreme lack of food, or essentially starving; at least 30% of children suffer from acute malnutrition or wasting, meaning they’re too thin for their height; and two adults or four children per every 10,000 people are dying daily of hunger and its complications.

In northern Gaza, the first condition of extreme lack of food has been met, senior WFP spokesman Steve Taravella told The Associated Press. The second condition of child acute malnutrition is nearly met, he said. But the death rate could not be verified.

.... “The bottom line is that people are practically dying from a lack of food, water and medicines. If we are waiting for the moment when all the facts are in hand to verify the final conditions to scientifically declare a famine, it would be after thousands of people have perished,” Taravella said.

In January, the UN said that 378,000 Gazans were at the IPC5 stage. In March, they said that 677,000 Gazans were at IPC5. And they predicted that by July the number would be 1,107,000 people.

Using the January numbers, we should expect - according to the IPC's own definitions - 75 adults or 150 children dying every day in Gaza from malnutrition. Using the March numbers, those statistics should be 136 adults or 272 children a day. According to their projections for a month from now, there should be 220 adults or 440 children dying every day in Gaza.

The actual number is zero. 

According to the Hamas health ministry, 28 people - all children - died of starvation by the end of March. Many of the children who died were given large amounts  of coverage by the media.  

But since then we have not heard about a single additional death from starvation, when the numbers were supposed to accelerate - not from the media and not from the Gaza health authorities.

If dozens or hundreds of Gazans were starving to death every day, you can be sure that the health ministry would be shouting this from the rooftops - which in fact they did when the number was 28. Al Jazeera reporters who have unusually excellent access to all Gaza hospitals would be taking lots of videos of emaciated, wasted children dying or dead in hospitals. It would be hard to hide hundreds of deaths a day if Gaza authorities wanted to - and they certainly don't want to.

If no one is dying, then half of Gaza cannot be in IPC5. 

What can explain the huge disconnect? If a large percentage of children have measurably thin arm circumferences,  why aren't we hearing about them dying?

I'm not seeing any of the experts who wrote the IPC report in mid-March issuing any clarifications about their predictions. Their prediction of 1.1 million Gazans in IPC5 remains on their dashboard today. 

Either the raw data on family access to food and measurable factors of severely underweight children is being falsified, or there is a lot more food in Gaza than we are being led to believe.  

Either way, we are not being told the truth. And that should concern every consumer of news and NGO reports. Because if something that is supported by so many scientists and data analysts who do not have obvious biases is proven to be so incredibly wrong, how can anyone believe anything that they are hearing about Gaza?

To add another absurdity, th AP article tried to answer the question of why there is so little data on people starving to death, and its answer shows the hypocrisy of the media:

[Verifying the death rate from starvation] is difficult. Aid groups note that Israeli airstrikes and raids have devastated medical facilities in northern Gaza and displaced much of the population. Along with restrictions on access, they complicate the ability to formally collect data on deaths.  
So let's get this straight: the Hamas authorities are believed when they say exactly how many Gazans are killed by the war, but when it comes to deaths by starvation the data gathering is suddenly neat to impossible?






Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

AddToAny

EoZ Book:"Protocols: Exposing Modern Antisemitism"

Printfriendly

EoZTV Podcast

Podcast URL

Subscribe in podnovaSubscribe with FeedlyAdd to netvibes
addtomyyahoo4Subscribe with SubToMe

search eoz

comments

Speaking

translate

E-Book

For $18 donation








Sample Text

EoZ's Most Popular Posts in recent years

Hasbys!

Elder of Ziyon - حـكـيـم صـهـيـون



This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For 20 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.

Donate!

Donate to fight for Israel!

Monthly subscription:
Payment options


One time donation:

Follow EoZ on Twitter!

Interesting Blogs

Blog Archive