Thursday, January 18, 2024

  • Thursday, January 18, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon

At the Fort Hamilton Islamic Society of Bay Ridge, a  Brooklyn imam admits that Islam considers all Jews to be the enemy, not the "Zionists."


It's all in English.

From MEMRI:

Imam: "It is important that we are able to identify criminals properly, because what you find the majority of people allowing us to say is that this is a conflict between Zionists and Islam or Zionists and the Palestinian people. That is interesting that the media or society allows us to say the word 'Zionists' but will never allow us to say the word 'Jewish.' And so you should ask yourselves, why I am even being allowed to say the word 'Zionists' unless this word is a red herring, a word that is actually not true or has falsehood to it and so I am allowed to say it because they know that we have still not identified the true target and the true oppressors. Zionism, they say, was created in 1945, I ask you, what about the incident of Ashab Al-Ukhdud, the people of the trench? The king at that time was Jewish, and he told his community that if they refused to accept Judaism he would kill them all. What do we call that? Was he a Zionist or was that Jewish extremism?
[...]
"Consider with me for a moment. If they have been living in this situation for the past 75 years, and in the past 75 years, just imagine with me for a moment, they embraced Judaism and left Islam, left Christianity. Would they fight them for this piece of land? If they embraced Judaism in the last 75 years, gave up their rights and said 'this is an Israeli state, I am Jewish now,' would they fight them?
[...]
"They are fighting them because of Islam. They are not fighting them only because they are Arab, they are fighting them because of their faith. And if they would just buckle and give up their faith and abandon their religion and abandon belief in Allah and obedience to His messenger and would roll over and would accept Judaism, like others have, only Allah knows whether there would be a conflict there today."
Ashab Al-Ukhdud is an incident mentioned in the Quran where a Jewish convert king of Himyar, Dhu Nuwas, supposedly threw a bunch of Christians into a burning pit for refusing to convert to Judaism like him. He is not exactly a household name among Jews, and no one looks at him as a hero or role model. 

But to this bigot, he represents all Jews for all time. 

I have to say, though, I prefer antisemites to be honest about it. 



Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 


  • Thursday, January 18, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon

Ahmed Majdalani, a member of the Executive Committee of the PLO and the current social affairs minister in the Palestinian government, is being heavily criticized by Palestinian activists for calling Hamas a "terrorist organization."

Speaking on Al Arabiya's Al-Hadath channel,  Majdalani said, “Hamas is a terrorist organization in its current form, its current program, and its current political discourse, and it may be part of the solution [only] if it abandons armed resistance.” 

Majdalani said Hamas should "rely on a solution based on international legitimacy resolutions and international law,” saying that if this happens, it will be a “fundamental change” in Hamas’s doctrine. 

All of these are entirely consistent with what the PA has been telling the West for years. But Majdalani apparently didn't get the memo that with Hamas' huge popularity among Palestinians since October 7, he must not say anything negative about them or their actions, in the name of "Palestinian unity."

The Palestinian National and Islamic Forces issued a statement saying, “We condemn in the strongest terms the statements that depart from the national consensus made by the minister in the Shtayyeh government, Ahmed Majdalani, to Al-Arabiya channel, in which he speaks with the mouth of the occupation, describing the Hamas movement as a terrorist!”

The statement continued, "These statements are unpatriotic and represent a departure from the national consensus, and they are an instrument to serve the occupation and its agenda aimed at striking the national unity and steadfastness of the Palestinian people who are facing a war of genocide and torture in Gaza and the West Bank."

They demanded his removal from his positions.

The invocation of "unity" is a remarkable thing. It means that the most extreme, violent components of Palestinian political structure have control over everyone else. The more explicit terror groups rarely subscribe to the idea of "unity" and public agreement with the more moderate policies - the unity only goes one way, towards the extremists. 

This is partially because of the Arab honor/shame dynamic. Public disagreements (especially in front of the West) are shameful, and the illusion of Palestinian unity must be maintained, even when everyone knows that Hamas and the PA are bitter enemies. 

As a result, even moderate Palestinian media will not criticize Hamas for its dragging the region into a potential war and for putting the lives of tens of thousands of Palestinians in Gaza in danger. (This also applies to Arab media altogether.) And this fear of being shamed for public disagreements means that Arab media will not publish anything against the most heinous terror acts - and therefore the people will reflexively support even terror groups associated with the Muslim Brotherhood like Hamas that are largely despised in normal times.







Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Thursday, January 18, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
The Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies released the results of a survey of the Arab world last week, and it shows that the overwhelming majority of Arabs consider the 10/7 pogrom to be "legitimate."

A total of 88% considered the attack legitimate, while only 5% considered it illegitimate. 67% considered it entirely legitimate, 19% say it was legitimate but Hamas made some mistakes, and 2% admitted that it included heinous or criminal acts - but was still legitimate.

Among Palestinians surveyed in the West Bank, 0%  - yes, statistically nobody - considered 10/7 illegitimate. 11% said some mistakes were made and 4% admitted it included heinous acts, but was legitimate anyway.

Libya and Jordan supported the attack even more than Palestinians in the West Bank d0, although a tiny percentage considered it criminal.

Citizens of Arab countries across the board considered the terror attack to be legitimate. But the UAE and Bahrain were not included in this survey.



Even though this survey showing near unanimous support for the October 7 terror attack among Arabs was released a week ago, major media ignored the survey. Because telling the world how supportive the Arab world is of attacking civilian is not something the media wants the world to know. 


51% of Arabs say that the United States is the biggest threat to the security of the Middle East -  far higher than Israel, for which 26% considered the most dangerous. Iran got only 7%.

The survey also found that the vast majority of the Arab world - 84% - felt a great deal of psychological stress as a result of the war. The respondents that showed the least stress over the war were - Palestinians from the West Bank!



69% of Arabs support Gazans and Hamas, while 23% say they support the people of Gaza but oppose Hamas.



Again, the huge support for Hamas by the Arab world at large contradicts the conventional wisdom that the media and Western politicians have been carefully cultivating of a moderate and peace-loving Arab majority. Killing and raping Jews is very, very popular in the Arab world. 

People ignore the facts at their own peril.








Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

Wednesday, January 17, 2024

From Ian:

NGO Monitor: The Global Samidoun Network: Mapping Branches in Europe and North America
Founded in 2012, and designated by Israel as a terror entity in 2021, Samidoun: Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network promotes the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) terrorist organization through an international network of activists. Samidoun branches, including in Western countries, publicly support and celebrate the PFLP, its actions and its leaders; campaign for the release of jailed PFLP members; and promote anti-Israel campaigns. Moreover, Samidoun advocates for Palestinians’ “natural right to armed resistance.”

Samidoun does not publish financial information, including funding sources and annual income. In the US, according to its website, “Samidoun Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network is a fiscally sponsored project of the Alliance for Global Justice, a 501(c)(3) Organization.” Samidoun is also a registered not-for-profit in Canada (since March 2021).

The February 2021 designation of Samidoun by the Israeli Ministry of Defense identifies the organization as an arm of the PFLP. A press statement accompanying the designation added that Samidoun was founded by “members of the PFLP in 2012,” and that it “plays a leading and significant role in the PFLP’s anti-Israel propaganda efforts, fundraising, and recruiting activists,” serving as a “front for the PFLP abroad.” In 2020, Germany expelled Samidoun head Khaled Barakat and imposed a four-year entry ban; his appeal was rejected, citing PFLP links and “support for a terrorist organization.” In 2022, Barakat was denied entry into the EU.

This report provides representative examples of the activities of major Samidoun chapters and key activists in Europe and North America. This includes supporting the PFLP and its members, justifying the use of violence, and incitement against the state of Israel.1

While the network operates on several continents, and has a notable presence in Iran, this document addresses Samidoun activities in Canada, France, the Netherlands, the US, Germany, and Belgium.2
‘The left has become Hamas’s useful idiots’
Ever since Hamas’s 7 October pogrom, Western cities have been overwhelmed by anti-Israel protests on a near-weekly basis. These demos have, without fail, descended into carnivals of anti-Semitism. Yet the self-styled anti-racists on the progressive left have remained silent about this Jew hatred. Many of them have marched side by side with Islamist anti-Semites. Many of them have made openly anti-Semitic comments themselves. How did we get here? Can the left ever recover from this staggering moral lapse?

Jake Wallis Simons – editor of the Jewish Chronicle – returned to The Brendan O’Neill Show to discuss the new anti-Semitism and much more. What follows is an edited extract from their conversation. Listen to the full episode here.

Brendan O’Neill: What do you think the so-called pro-Palestine marches tell us about people’s views after the 7 October pogrom?

Jake Wallis Simons: It tells us a lot about what we should be afraid of in Britain. The skeleton of the marches, in particular, was very interesting. In October, we published a story in the Jewish Chronicle where we exposed the fact that four out of the six groups heading the marches had leaders with strong and explicit connections to Hamas. These people had gone to Gaza and met with Hamas leadership. They were fairly open about it, too.

Up and down the country you have also had radical preachers in mosques openly arguing from the pulpit in support of Hamas. It is a crime in Britain to support Hamas, which is a proscribed terrorist organisation. Yet these preachers were openly flouting the law, filming their preachings and putting them up on X. And the police are still doing the square root of bugger all about it. In fact, Scotland Yard has instead been investigating Israeli war crimes in Gaza. They’ve been putting up signs asking any witnesses to please come forward so that the police can investigate said crimes. This is the same police force that has for decades failed to enforce the law by arresting jihadists.

This has been particularly clear during the marches, where many of the protesters have been incredibly intimidating. Early on, there was an attack on a brave Iranian activist who was flying an Israeli flag at one of the marches. He was pursued and threatened with beheading. The police managed to protect him, but one of his aggressors was found to be carrying a knife. These are the kinds of people attending the marches.

And then there’s the outer-corona of useful idiots, almost exclusively from the political left. These are people who probably know very little about the particulars of the conflict. Various videos have exposed that. Students in the US, for example, were asked which sea was being referred to in the chant, ‘From the river to the sea’. Answers varied from the Caribbean Sea to the Atlantic Ocean.
UK group ‘deeply sorry’ its journal scrapped Jewish trauma article
The British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy, which represents more than 60,000 mental-health professionals across England and Wales, stated earlier this month that it is “deeply sorry” that it didn’t publish an article titled “A community in traumatic stress,” as well as “for the hurt that decision has caused.”

The article, by the psychologist Sandi Mann, a senior lecturer at the University of Central Lancashire, had been slated to appear in the association’s journal Workplace. The association subsequently posted the article online.

“It will also go in the next print version of the journal,” Mann wrote on LinkedIn. “This is a very important victory against the culture of threats and intimidation that Jews are facing in the UK today.”

“When Hamas committed its horrendous massacre of approximately 1,200 Israeli civilians and abduction of over 240 men, women and children on Saturday, Oct. 7, 2023, the impact on the local Jewish communities in the UK was immediate,” Mann wrote in the journal article. “The impact of the terrorist atrocities was to send the local Jewish communities into a state of traumatic stress.”

Mental-health professionals at the Jewish Action for Mental Health, which Mann chairs, “quickly became burned out” by soaring demands following the attack, “not just to provide therapy but to speak at events, hold Zoom sessions and even to offer Zoom support to the traumatized in Israel,” she wrote. “When desperate people look to us to make them better and we can’t take away the pain, that is tough—when this happens at a mass level for so long, it can become unbearable.”

“I hope that no community in the UK ever needs to benefit from what we have learnt about mass trauma response—but if they do, we are ready to help,” Mann concluded.
  • Wednesday, January 17, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
I have never seen the sheer volume of antisemitism in Arab media as there is nowadays. 

Here is the top picture in an article in an Arab cultural newspaper, part of a series on how Jews are portrayed in movies. I'm not even sure what point the author is trying to make, but the graphic artist is pretty clear was to how they want the reader to look at The Jew.



“ I learned about their roles in the extremist homosexual movement, the radical feminist movement, and the pornography industry, in addition to their excessive contribution to encouraging and making abortions available to non-Jews .”

“ I discovered their role in organized crime, the slave trade, the civil rights movement, and Freemasonry .”

“ I read about the hatred of those committed to the Babylonian Talmud for non-Jews, their complete lack of respect for Jesus Christ, the Virgin Mary, Christianity, and Christians in general, and the facts that Christ himself killed them .”

“ I learned about the (impudence) in their claim that the lives of nations are worth no more than the lives of barnyard animals, but they consider that the lives of Jews are closer to God Himself. There is nothing wrong with stealing from non-Jews or killing a Gentile, but the lives of Jews are sacred .”

“ I learned that they control the majority of wealth, the media, and academia, even though they constitute less than 2% of the population in the United States, and much less than that of humanity, which is 18 million out of 8 billion people .”

The writer continues, saying: “They are behind the movement to legislate hate crimes that was formulated to silence anyone who might expose their agenda and try to shed light on it .”
Multiple articles like this are published every single day.  And no one is talking about it. 



Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 



Disclaimer: the views expressed here are solely those of the author, weekly Judean Rose columnist Varda Meyers Epstein.

“Never trust an Arab—even when he is dead!” So said Abu Musa to my husband some 40-plus years ago. Abu Musa was a shyster contractor who knew how to overcharge his Jewish customers and get away with it. Dov was a student in the yeshiva under the tutelage of the man who was currently being ripped off by Abu Musa. Sometimes Dov, not long in Israel, would chat up Abu Musa to learn a bit of Arabic, and something about Arab culture, too.   

Well, Dov learned something, all right. He learned from an Arab, never to trust an Arab.

It’s a difficult lesson for people who grew up like me and my husband; that we dare not trust a certain, specific people. We were raised to believe that this is wrong. Our parents taught us to judge people on the content of their character and to be polite and respectful to people no matter what they look like or believe.

For example, there was a home for disabled children located not far from my childhood home. Sometimes, a caregiver would take two or three children for a walk in the neighborhood. My mother taught me that if we passed them on the street, not to stare, and to smile and be polite the same as with any other passersby. These children had obvious, moderately severe disabilities. So my mother was preparing me for a shock, at the same time telling me not to show the shock because it would be rude and hurtful to do so.

The first lesson happened in real time. My mother explained things to me quietly, as we were about to pass by some of the children with their caregiver. There was no need for a second lesson. The next time we saw a group of kids and their caregiver up ahead, my mother didn’t say a word. She gave my hand a subtle squeeze and that was a sufficient reminder and review of what—and what not—to do. Lesson learned.

There were other lessons I learned from my parents. My late father loved to quote Dale Carnegie, “Don’t criticize, condemn, or complain.”

But most of these lessons were taught without words. My parents treated the few black people they knew, the same as everybody else. No one had to brief me on the subject, or nod at me when we were about to encounter someone with skin a different color, or eyes a different shape from my own. I learned by example that someone’s appearance is not a reason to hate.

This is what I was taught it meant to be a nice person. To understand that people come in all shapes, sizes, and colors, and to refrain from judging them on these things. To treat everyone as you would want to be treated, with respect.

That is how I was raised as a Jewish American from a middle class home. I know that my peers, and certainly my husband, from a remarkably similar background, were raised the same way. And still, here I am, someone who doesn’t trust an entire people, specifically the Arab people. It’s not about their ethnicity, or their color, but the fact that the Arab people have earned our mistrust. Too many times, it was that nice Arab worker who came back to rape and murder their employer.


I don’t trust Arabs and it’s not only about October 7. I didn’t trust Arabs long before that black day. I know of too many examples of trusted Arabs who proved to be terrorist monsters and of too many horrendous examples of Arab terror.

I no longer have to explain this to friends who once said, “I can’t be friends with anyone who says they ‘hate’ Arabs.”


It is sad really, how many of us Israelis feel sad that when it comes to Arabs, we are not able to apply what we learned in our homes about being nice people. We distrust Arabs, even if we don’t know them as individuals and there are no outward signs of anything amiss. With good reason. October 7 being the turning point for many good people.


The Arabs give us no choice. It’s a matter of life or death, this lack of trust. At the same time, not every Arab is untrustworthy. The problem is, there’s no way to know. And if you want to stay alive, it’s better to be safe and mistrust, than trust and be dead.


I have exactly two Arab friends. Or “had.” One of the two is now dead, and still I trust him more than most living people, despite Abu Musa. He found a way to prove his loyalty to me and my people. The other Arab friend is thankfully alive, and has proven his loyalty to the Jewish State a thousand times over (as did his father before him).

The others? In some cases, “trust, but verify” works.

For example, the nice, normal Arab clerk at the desk in dermatology at Hadassah. She’s wearing a hijab, which could be a sign of extremism, but we’re only going to have limited interaction, so I can be “normal” with her. It’s a question, I guess, of good faith. She’s being polite and professional, and deserves to be treated like a normal human being. Sure, she could self-detonate and kill herself and every Jew in the waiting room at any given moment, but me being rude to her probably wouldn’t change her mind.

Two months after October 7, with all of us more suspicious of Arabs, an Arab woman knocked into my husband and made him spill hot coffee on himself. He brushed off his clothes and muttered something under his breath and that would probably have been that. Except that the woman ran after us to apologize profusely, rummaging through her handbag and offering up a package of wet wipes. (I can still see the package in my mind’s eyes, it was an Arab brand of wet wipes we don’t see in our stores. They were lemon-scented.) She was really sorry and she was kind. And she, too, was wearing a hijab.

We would never have seen her again. She didn’t have to run up to us and apologize a gazillion times and try to give Dov her wet wipes. The possibility occurs that in the wake of October 7, she was trying to tell us, “Not all of us support terror. Not all of us are filled with hate and trying to kill you/rape you/torture you/kidnap you/shoot missiles at you/,” and etc.

Or maybe she just wanted everyone in the vicinity to see that, “Oh, look. Here’s a good Arab. They still exist.”

How can I know? How can I possibly know? The answer is I can’t, and that answer comes straight from the lips of a shyster Arab contractor, “Never trust an Arab. Even when he is dead.”  

For all I know Abu Musa himself, is dead. But take his advice to heart. Be he live or be he dead, he’s not to be trusted if you value your life.



Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

From Ian:

Melanie Phillips: We need to face up to the scale of the axis against Israel
The Conservative MP Andrew Percy has accused the BBC of putting British Jews directly at risk through its coverage of the Israel-Gaza conflict.

Absolutely. The BBC’s relentless portrayal of the Israelis not as the victims of genocidal terror but as hard-hearted, vengeful and wanton killers of children and the innocent has channelled ancient antisemitic tropes of Jewish blood-lust and helped fuel an enormous increase in attacks on Jews.

As Percy said, the BBC’s double standards on Israel, treating patently absurd civilian casualty figures from Hamas as reliable while casting doubt on Israeli statements, present Israel rather than Hamas as the aggressor and rogue actor.

A principal offender has been the Today programme presenter, Mishal Husain. Interviewing the Defence Secretary Grant Shapps on Monday, she unleashed a barrage of distorted and out-of-context quotes to demonise Israel as a bloodthirsty aggressor.

Claiming that the IDF spokesman, Rear-Admiral Daniel Hagari, had said in October that “our focus is on creating damage not precision,” and that Israel’s defence minister, Yoav Gallant, had said “we will eliminate everything” in Gaza, Husain said these remarks suggested Israel wasn’t acting within international law and might be why “so many Palestinians have died”.

Yet as the Guardian acknowledged on 5 December, Hagari had been mistranslated. He had actually said: “While balancing accuracy with the scope of damage, right now we’re focused on what causes maximum damage”.

Gallant’s words have been taken out of context. He had said: “Gaza won’t return to what it was before, and Hamas will not exist. We will eliminate everything”. He meant eliminating Hamas, not Gaza’s civilians.

In any event, what matters is not what’s said but what Israel does. For the ratio of civilians to combatants killed by Israel is around two to one.

This is far fewer than the proportion of civilians killed in war by any other nation’s army — and when taking into account the Hamas rockets falling short into Gaza and killing its people, fewer still.

Most disgusting of all was how Husain twisted Benjamin Netanyahu’s reference to the ancient Israelites’ biblical foe, Amalek, when he said: “We remember, and we are fighting.”

Husain claimed that “Amalek” involved the injunction to spare no-one and destroy “every man, woman and child, sheep, camel and donkey”. And she suggested this was the cause of Israel’s rate of death and destruction in Gaza.
Col. Tim Collins: There's No Solution in Gaza or the Red Sea until Iran Is Contained
The Iranian mullahs must be disabused of the notion that war is a viable pathway for them by a strong and coherent international response led by the U.S. Iran has a long history of directing its coalition of the damned, carefully constructed by the late Major General Qassim Soleimani, against the West, to achieve Iran's revolutionary aims across the Middle East.

The Houthi rebels, Shia tribesmen from Yemen, are part of Iran's al-Quds Force network of subversive groups. It also includes Hizbullah in Lebanon, the Popular Mobilization militias in Iraq, the regime forces of Syria, and Hamas, until lately in control of Gaza.

It is time to raise our collective gaze to the real cause of the attacks: Iran. Iran acts directly as well as through its proxies, boarding and seizing ships not only close to its coast in the Strait of Hormuz but further afield as well, most recently in the Gulf of Oman.

The international community must present a course of action toward Iran aimed at curtailing its activities and those of its proxies. It would be a waste of time to do this through the UN.

Only once Iran is contained can we get back to finding a solution to the conflict in Gaza without a gun to our heads.
No Israeli Would Ever Be Safe amid Capitulation to Hamas
Israel must destroy the military capabilities of Hamas and prevent its leadership in Gaza from holding on to power there. This means the IDF must not at this time, or in the near future, end the fighting and withdraw from Gaza. If the Hamas infrastructure remains in place and its senior leadership remains unharmed, then no Israeli can be safe. An IDF withdrawal of forces from Gaza would be regarded as a capitulation to Hamas. It would be a complete sacrifice of the security of Israelis and would have significant strategic consequences.

We would all be at risk of being kidnapped by any Iranian proxy. No Israeli would be able to travel safely abroad without fearing abduction, and that is especially true for the young travelers who visit third world countries. Furthermore, even a weekend getaway in the north would be risky.

If Israel allows Hamas to remain in power in Gaza, they would only prepare for the next murderous assault from that border, while Israel's deterrence for all of its enemies would be lost, and any will of moderate Arab nations to normalize their relations with Israel would diminish.

For Israelis to live with a modicum of security, the IDF must be allowed to complete its mission to destroy the Hamas military infrastructure above and bellow ground and remove its leaders.
In early December, The Lancet published a peer-reviewed study that sought to prove that the Gaza Ministry of Health casualty counts were largely accurate.

Their methodology was to compare the number of deaths per thousand reported by the Gaza Ministry of Health with the number of deaths per thousand of UNRWA employees, which were counted independently by UNRWA and not the Hamas ministry.

They found that the two death rates were roughly the same (actually, UNRWA's was higher), indicating that the health ministry was not exaggerating the total number of deaths.




The methodology is flawed. It makes an assumption that everyone in Gaza has an equal chance of being killed, meaning that Israel is killing people randomly and indiscriminately. This is not only a false assumption, but an antisemitic one. 

Indeed, one reason UNRWA workers could have been killed at a higher rate is because none of them are children - and more than half of them are males of fighting age. About two thirds of the first 101 killed were men, a higher percentage than the percentage of male employees at UNRWA (about 54% across UNRWA, not sure about Gaza itself.) Chances are that at least some of the UNRWA casualties were also legal combatants, either actively participating or acting as "spotters" or other support. 

But there's another problem with this. If the Lancet methodology is correct, then it should be correct for every month of the war, not just the first month.

But over the past month, from December 15 to January 15, Hamas claims 5200 people were killed - 2.4 per thousand. But only 15 UNRWA employees were killed in that same timeframe - only 1.1 per thousand! (I'm assuming 13,500 UNRWA employees and 2.2 million total population of Gaza, which seems to be The Lancet's numbers.) 

Using the Lancet's own methodology, even assuming the false assumption that UNRWA employees represent the entire population of Gaza rather than only adults and primarily males, the number of deaths claimed by Hamas is over double what their methodology would predict!

That's thousands of false Gaza deaths - using the methodology of this peer-reviewed paper.

Even if we accept that the Gaza health ministry had accurate information for the first month of the war, logic indicates that as Gaza infrastructure has deteriorated, the reliability of their figures has gone down as well. As we showed earlier, even the UN no longer parrots the Hamas claims that 70% of the deaths are women and children. There is no reason to believe the ministry of health figures over the past two months given that we know their "70% women and children" number is pure propaganda.

Which strongly indicates that Hamas is mandating how many deaths to claim, and the relationship with reality is increasingly tenuous as the war goes on and as Hamas sees its figures accepted as truth worldwide. 

Beyond that, would the Lancet even consider publishing a paper using the exact same methodology for the time period of December 15-January 15 as I've shown here? I highly doubt it. Which shows how even "peer reviewed" papers can be biased, even when their numbers are accurate - the researchers and editors are looking only to publish papers that confirm their biases, and they won't even bother to look at anything that shows that disproves their biases.

But if any doctors and statisticians want to take this data and submit it to this formerly prestigious journal - data that thoroughly rebuts the first paper - it would be instructive to see whether they are honest enough to publish it. 

(If you are wondering, the data for November 10-December 15 shows a 2.5/1000 death rate for UNRWA employees and 3.5/1000 for Hamas figures of Gaza' general population - also a significant difference, but not as striking as the most recent month.)


(h/t Ibn Boutros)



Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Wednesday, January 17, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
 Khaled Abdel Rahman Al-Awad, writing in Saudi newspaper Al Bilad Daily, asserts, "Zionists believe that other nations are inferior to the Jews and that they deserve to be exterminated and killed, and some of their officials have boldly stated this publicly."

His "proof" is really something:

This story that reveals this abhorrent racism: a Jew named Shaul Simonov left the Soviet Union heading to New York City when Menachem Begin was head of state for Zionism, specifically to the Brooklyn neighborhood where many Jews live without fear, surveillance, or contempt. Simonov felt proud when he saw his fellow citizens living in this Jewish neighborhood with freedom, reassurance, and prosperity.

He was reading the names of the shops on the street with pride, as they were written in English and Hebrew. But this joy and euphoria quickly disappeared when he was struck by a sign in English above a shop selling sandwiches with the words “No Jews allowed to enter” written on it in clear language. Shaul Simonov felt very angry because he did not expect this hateful racism that spoiled his happy moment, and he decided to enter this racist buffet.

He said to the shop owner: "I am Shaul Simonov, an immigrant from Odessa. I came just to get acquainted."  The shop owner replied with a smile: "I am Moshe Levi Kaganovich, an immigrant from Ukraine. "  

Saul was silent for a while, then exploded, saying: "So are you a Jew like us, and are you insulting your brothers and family? Why do you forbid them to eat and drink in this place?" 
Moshe Levi Kaganovich interrupted him whispering: "Have you tasted my food? Did you see how we prepare food in this kitchen before you accused me of anti-Semitism? Come and see for yourself!"
Simonov felt very happy, as this food and drink were not appropriate for God's chosen people. This filth, fraud, and high prices are only suitable for non-Jewish infidels, or goyim, as they are called in Hebrew. Simonov blessed this noble act and left the store looking at that sign, smiling maliciously and devilishly.

It is pretty obvious that this never happened. It was probably a perversion of an old Jewish joke. 

But it "proves" how evil Jews are to Saudi readers!






Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Wednesday, January 17, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon



I mentioned yesterday that Gazan shopkeepers and drivers are charging exorbitant rates to take advantage of people's distress instead of working together to help each other as Israelis are doing during the war.

Another story in a similar vein was published in Sada News - this one about moneychangers.

Gaza workers who normally get their salaries from ATM machines are now at the mercy of moneychangers who are charging as much as 15%:

The banks are closed and the ATMs are destroyed, and until the employee gets the money in his hands, he will go through a journey of exploitation, from people who have “cash” in their hands, and they charge commissions ranging between 5-7-10-15% for the exchange!

This forces the employee to agree to the fees despite the clear exploitation of people's circumstances during the most difficult times they are going through. 

The matter is not limited to moneychangers only, but Sada learned that commercial stores were able to partially open their doors recently, disbursing employees’ salaries in the same way, “transferring the value of the salary through banking applications, and when notification arrives of the completion of the transfer process, the employee is given his salary, minus a commission he specifies. He charges money as he pleases.”

This also affected remittances that reach citizens from abroad, for example via Western Union, in exchange for which they are disbursed with large commissions of up to 15%. 
They are such wonderful people!



Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

Tuesday, January 16, 2024

From Ian:

Seth Mandel: ‘Footballing While Jewish’ and Other Crimes
You’d be surprised how sensitive people can be about the possibility they or their family will accidentally see or hear a Jewish person. Last month the Telegraph reported that British Airways had decided to “pause” a plan to include the Jewish sitcom Hapless in its in-flight entertainment offerings just after Oct. 7. The airline didn’t want to “take sides.” The Telegraph had seen the internal messages confirming the airline’s decision.

The series they chose not to show is about a Jewish newspaper in London. I don’t know how to pretend this decision isn’t completely insane.

“Pause” is a word that comes up a lot these days in the post-Oct. 7 entertainment industry. Haaretz reports that “Netflix has hit the pause button on broadcasting several Israeli series. One of them is the action drama ‘Border Patrol,’ which it acquired in September following its premiere on the Hot cable TV channel. Another is the original Israeli comedy drama ‘Through Fire and Water,’ created by Hanan Savion and Guy Amir, which was scheduled to premiere on Netflix in early November but was postponed.” A third series was put on ice by Netflix shortly after.

Producers told Haaretz that European companies were more easily spooked by their association with Israel than American ones were. Some told Israeli producers, “we have to stop and wait for better days.”

Perhaps after some time has gone by, everyone will be more comfortable watching actors portray Jewish characters, or playing hockey or soccer or cricket with Jewish athletes. I don’t think we have much to worry about, though: No one seems particularly bothered by it all, at all.
Brendan O'Neill: Gary Lineker and the bigotry of the virtue-signallers
Let’s be clear about BDS: it is sectarian intolerance masquerading as social justice. It invites the middle classes – those most inclined to cultural boycotts – to obsessively avoid any foodstuff, book, idea or person that originates from the evil state of Israel. It makes a virtue of being ‘Israel-free’. Protect your pristine life and pristine self from the moral pollution of the Jewish State – that, in a nutshell, is what the cult of BDS says to the right-thinking sections of society. The fast track to moral glory in leafy, right-on Britain is to foreswear all things made by Those People.

The impact of BDS has been horrible. We’ve seen violinists booed and jeered at the Proms for the crime of being Israeli. Israeli dance troupes have faced furious protests in the UK. A theatre in London pulled the plug on a Jewish Film Festival. Authors like Alice Walker and Sally Rooney have declined requests for their books to be published in Israel (I guess that’s one upside of BDS for Israelis). Israeli produce is ostentatiously shunned and sometimes even destroyed. A few years ago, ‘pro-Palestine’ protesters in Birmingham stormed a Tesco and hurled Israeli food products on to the floor – proof of the irrational dread of all things Israeli that BDS stirs up in its supporters.

The hypocrisy of the BDS cult is extraordinary. These people will go to mad lengths to dodge oranges grown in Israel and films part-funded by the Israeli government, but they’ll happily buy their kids toys made in China and go on holiday in Turkey. The plight of the Uighurs and Kurds make not a dent in their conscience. The double standards of the BDS mentality can be glimpsed in Lineker himself. He retweets the suggestion that Israel should be kicked out of football yet he’s happy to watch Iran play football. In fact, he’s happy to commentate on Iran playing football.

During the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, Lineker anchored the England-Iran match for the BBC. This was at the precise time the Iranian authorities were slaughtering hundreds of their own citizens, young women and men, who had dared to rise up against the law of mandatory hijab-wearing and against theocratic tyranny more broadly. No red card for Iran? Why not? Is the killing of young Iranian women who want to show their hair in public less bothersome to the virtue-signallers than the killing of Gazan civilians in the Israel-Hamas war? Lineker’s cant should be treated with the contempt it deserves. This is a man happy to host matches from a misogynistic, homophobic regime (Qatar) featuring a nation that murders its own citizens (Iran), and yet he thinks Israel should be kicked out? What a tosser.

Banning Jewish film festivals, boycotting shops with links to the Jewish State, screaming in fury when a musician from the Jewish nation starts to play… does this remind Mr Lineker of anything? How striking that Lineker hears echoes of the 1930s in so many things – including in Suella Braverman’s comments about immigration – but not in this noisy, feverish boycotting of all Jewish State stuff. That he’s happy to swan around in Qatar, a nation that funds Hamas, the terror group that carried out the worst attack on the Jews since the Holocaust, and then get on his social-media soapbox about Israel is not only preposterous – it’s sick-making.

I would wager that many Brits with dual Israeli citizenship, or just British Jews who have an affinity with Israel, now feel even more isolated from the public broadcaster following Lineker’s promotion of BDS bigotry. Seriously, Gary – do you have no shame?
Melanie Phillips: Anti-western ideology is infecting public sector
The term “far right” is routinely used to smear anyone whose attitudes challenge progressive dogma. The loudmouth and undeniably offensive Joe Rogan was more accurately described by CNN as “libertarian-leaning”.

Murray’s own thought-crime is to be a passionate and articulate supporter of Israel and a clear-sighted analyst of Islamist extremism. The similarly robust Shawcross had to fight a determined attempt by Home Office civil servants, who subscribed to the “Islamist extremism is exaggerated” mindset, to prevent his government-ordered report from ever seeing the light of day.

Shawcross and Murray play a courageous role in the struggle to defend Britain and the civilised world against its enemies. For lecturers in counterterrorism to dismiss, smear or try to cancel them in this way shows how deeply the rot in society has penetrated.

Stanley resigned from the Foreign Office and has emigrated to Israel in despair at what she perceives as the institutionalised dogma fuelling epidemic Jew-hatred and wildly distorting Britain’s foreign policy by helping forces hostile to the West.

The universities and other institutions are riddled by anti-western thinking. But these tropes are also being used to service the agenda of Islamists intent upon undermining the free world. King’s enjoys close links with Qatar, which funds the university’s centre for global banking and finance. A decade ago, King’s had a four-year teaching contract with the Qatari government worth £26 million. Professor Denise Lievesley, the dean of the university’s faculty of social sciences and public policy, called Qatar “comparatively liberal” for the region.

But Qatar funds Hamas and supports the Muslim Brotherhood, as was laid out in a 2022 Policy Exchange report by Sir John Jenkins, formerly the Foreign Office’s senior Arabist. He said that although both Conservative and Labour ministers had hailed Qatar as a “friend and partner”, it had often pursued a foreign policy at odds with British and western interests.

Significant and often disguised funding by Qatar, said the report, had been used to support Islamist groups in the US, Britain and Europe over the previous two decades. Such funding had openly supported university departments and think tanks studying “highly contested regional issues,” including King’s, Bristol University and St Antony’s College, Oxford, and built influence within parliamentary and other official circles.

Questions in parliament perhaps should go further than merely this disturbing course at King’s. Britain not only refuses to heed the warnings of people like Jenkins, but has spawned a culture that is actively helping promote the enemies of civilisation.
Tom Tugendhat orders review of Left-wing civil servant training over ‘indoctrination’ fear
Just yesterday Home Secretary James Cleverly announced he is to add Hizb ut-Tahrir to the list of proscribed terrorist groups, a group he described as an “antisemitic organisation that actively promotes and encourages terrorism, including praising and celebrating the appalling 7 October attacks”.

The same civil servant training course that downplayed Islamic terrorism also described Spectator journalist Douglas Murray, and US podcaster Joe Rogan, as “far-right”.

The lecturer invited those in attendance to deliberate “to what extent should Joe Rogan and Douglas Murray be suppressed”, and argued “society needs to find other ways to suppress them”.

Following the deeply concerning reports, Mr Tugendhat is demanding answers and action.

Speaking in the Commons yesterday, he told MPs: “If courses aren’t high quality and politically neutral then civil servants shouldn’t be attending them.”

Addressing the debate held at the training day, around whether they could define terrorism, Mr Tugendhat provided the left-wing lecturers with a straightforward answer.

He said: “We know what a terrorist is, the law knows what a terrorist is and this government knows what a terrorist is - that’s exactly why we’ve just proscribed Hizb ut-Tahrir.”

A King’s College London spokesman argued the training course was “taught by eminent experts using impartial and evidence-based resources in an environment where different theories, concepts and questions are shared to prompt discussion”.
The first one needs to be blown up (so to speak.)











Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Tuesday, January 16, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
Synagogue in Portugal defaced with "Free Palestine" on October 10, 2023

Two years ago, I noted that Jovan Byford, an expert on conspiracy theories, defined the line between legitimate criticism of Israel and antisemitism to be the line where that criticism turns into a conspiracy theory.
The events since October 7 show this to be true, yet again.

Every accusation against Israel is a conspiracy theory. The Leftist antisemites and their Islamist partners have put forth an astonishing number of Zionist schemes:

* The accusations of rape and sexual abuse on October 7 are all lies made up to demonize Palestinians
* The civilians murdered on October 7 were really killed by Israel and blamed on Hamas
* The returned hostages are all now lying about any abuse they suffered or witnessed; their words at gunpoint in Gaza were the real truth
* The IDF is deliberately targeting civilians and their denials prove it
* Any Israeli statements that they are only going after Hamas is a cover story for their real desire for genocide of Palestinians
    * But they are really bad at hiding that genocidal desire because they also say it explicitly, sometimes using secret code words like "Amalek"
* The entire war is a means for Netanyahu to stay in power
* Hamas members admitting atrocities on video have been tortured
* Any Western support for Israel is proof that Israel controls the West
* Israel doesn't really care about the hostages, all statements to the contrary are gaslighting
* Israel is hiding the real number of IDF soldiers killed
* Israel is digging up bodies of Gazans and stealing their organs to give to Jews

The list goes on and on.

But this is not only the domain of far-Left activists and Muslim antisemites. The major conspiracy theory being bandied about is one that every major media outlet is engaging in: the assumption that Israelis are lying in every statement, and nothing they say can be trusted.

This is the antisemitism of the BBC implying that the IDF forged evidence that Al Jazeera reporter Hamza al-Dahdouh was on the Islamic Jihad payroll. 

Or CNN implying that that the photos of weapons found in Shifa Hospital were untrustworthy because the weapons were moved to create a photo-op. 

Or the widespread assumptions by reporters who do not understand international law that Israel is obviously violating it. 

Or that every Israeli denial of accusations of war crimes - from murdering Christian women to firing on hospitals to bombing fleeing Gazans - is suspect, even though the IDF readily admits when it makes mistakes. 

I cannot count the number of times I've seen the media parrot Hamas claims about civilian casualties without any skepticism, while all Israeli evidence, photos, documents and videos are treated as inherently  untrustworthy.

The subtext for all these stories is that Jews are liars. Not only that, but they collude to hide their lies from the world. Their evidence might be faked, their statements that they were nowhere near reported incidents might be lies, their refusal to allow reporters to wander in a war zone is proof that they have something to hide and every reporter who dies was deliberately targeted. And at the same time, the media can find "experts" to confirm that Israeli statements are suspicious, using the same methods that 9/11 "truthers" use to claim that airplanes could not have brought down the World Trade Center. 

Somehow they never look for experts who can confirm Israeli statements. 

By their nature, conspiracy theories resist debunking, because all evidence is categorized as part of the conspiracy. When Israel immediately issues a denial it cannot be true because it happened to fast; when they spend three days ensuring that there was no IDF activity in the spot they are accused of war crimes that is proof that they spent the time manufacturing evidence. 

The only reason that the theories are so eagerly accepted is because so many people truly believe that Jews are always up to something. Having an audience eager to believe something is 90% of what the conspiracy theorists need to spread their poison. 

The progressive Left loves to claim that only the far-Right engage in conspiracy thinking and that they are interested in science and evidence. But their own antisemitic theories are no less conspiratorial than those of Qanon or David Duke. 





Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

From Ian:

Richard Goldberg: Pathetic: As Hamas plays sick games with hostages 100 days in, Biden whines he’s losing patience with Israel
Pro-terror demonstrations in America and Great Britain increasingly feature signs supporting the Iran-backed Houthi terror group, which is responsible for the continuous missile attacks on commercial vessels in the Red Sea — signaling support for radical anti-Western ideologies, not merely opposition to Israel.

At a weekend rally in London, one prominent Palestinian activist said, “We must normalize massacres as a status quo.”

And Hamas released a sickening video Monday of one Israeli hostage revealing the deaths of two others.

President Biden should be using these moments to further marginalize anti-Israel voices on his left flank.

Yet the louder and more extreme those voices grow, the faster Biden runs away from supporting a fellow democracy battling a terrorist group responsible for the murders of dozens of Americans — and which continues to hold other US citizens hostage.

Biden’s more strident insistence that Israel transition to “lower-intensity operations” against Hamas in Gaza comes alongside political pressure on Jerusalem to abandon a planned defensive military campaign on its northern border against an Iran-backed terror threat 10 times larger than Hamas.

Israeli officials may be underestimating Washington’s determination to “contain regional escalation” in an election year — code for strong-arming Israel into permitting Iran’s existential threats to remain intact even if it leaves the Jewish state exposed to another Oct. 7 and deterred from acting against Iran’s accelerating nuclear program.

Israel has already evacuated roughly 100,000 people from towns bordering Lebanon out of fear the Hezbollah terrorist organization might unleash its own surprise invasion.

But Hezbollah is not a threat just to Israel’s border communities — with 200,000 rockets, including thousands of precision-guided munitions, it is capable of threatening Haifa and Tel Aviv in addition to the country’s critical infrastructure.

Israelis will not return to their homes in the north so long as Hezbollah remains across the border.

And waiting around for Tehran’s order to rain missiles down on Israel while the ayatollah races across the nuclear threshold is a status quo Israel’s leaders can no longer accept.

But if Biden can’t stomach 100 days of war against Hamas after the horrific scenes of Oct. 7, can anyone be confident he’ll green-light military support for an even larger fight in Lebanon?

Indeed, the president withdrew a carrier strike group off Israel’s coast and sent a senior adviser to the region to negotiate Israel’s surrender of territory to Lebanon in exchange for Hezbollah moving a few kilometers north.

All while letting Iran gain access to $10 billion.

More than 75 years after its founding, Israel is waging its second war of independence.

Surviving the 21st century depends on Jerusalem dismantling Iran’s so-called “ring of fire” and denying Tehran its quest for nuclear weapons.

The war against Hamas in Gaza must be viewed as merely the first phase of this multifront confrontation.

Facing a shared adversary in Tehran, any US president should be fully committed to Israel’s success in this effort — not trying to pull the plug before Phase 1 is even complete.
WSJ Editorial: Palestinian ‘Pay for Slay’ Keeps Growing
Itamar Marcus of Palestinian Media Watch explains that “the PA does not differentiate between Hamas terrorists who committed atrocities after invading Israel on Oct. 7, the Hamas terrorists killed by Israel in the ensuing war, and civilian non-combatants killed in the Gaza Strip while being used as human shields by Hamas.” All are treated as heroic martyrs to be compensated by the PA, whose activities are subsidized with Western aid.

Meanwhile, in Ramallah, Mr. Blinken said that PA leader Mahmoud Abbas is “committed” to reform. Where’s the evidence? His four-year term is stretching into its 20th year. Even as the PA complains of a budget crunch, it is readying to move from glorifying the Oct. 7 attack to compensating its participants.

Why, again, does President Biden insist Israel hand over postwar Gaza to this group? Mr. Blinken also talks prematurely of giving it a state. No wonder the PA sees little reason to change.
Seth Mandel: Israel’s War Isn’t About Revenge
Necessary and winnable. True victory, then, is obligatory. To refuse to do so would be to knowingly subject your fellow citizens to wanton violence. It would diminish the freedom of the people whose freedom you have no right to diminish, and whose freedom you vowed to protect and defend.

Crucially, Cicero pointed out that to leave such an enemy intact is to increase its power. A wounded king receives pity from some and admiration from others; both provide help. And in each round, the act of rousting support for his stand against the stronger power makes the next fight more of a cause than the last, eventually including populations that otherwise have no vested interest in the war:

“And so Mithradates, after his defeat, was able to accomplish what, when he was in the full enjoyment of his powers, he never dared even to wish for.”

And so Hamas.

Every temporary defeat has left Hamas able to come back, rally a lifeline of support from countries like Iran and Qatar and Turkey, and construct a permanent base of war. And this time, after its greatest achievement was the carrying out of unimaginably barbaric atrocities, it has garnered its loftiest status as a heroic force, attested to by the throngs of marchers all over the world who were enthralled by what Hamas was willing to do to innocent Jews. Everything the world has done since Oct. 7 has incentivized Hamas—and, it should be said, other daring terrorist armies—to make Oct. 7 seem like a trial run for its next attack.

Yes, Israel has an obligation to achieve permanent victory over Hamas. Anything less would be unjust.

The following is a second interview with Dr. Harold Rhode.


The key to discussing the Middle East is understanding the cultures and languages. In Hebrew, you have the root P-T-Ch, corresponding to F-T-Ch in Arabic. The root has the general meaning of "open." But in Arabic, there is an additional meaning: opening up a land to Islam. So the leader in battle is called Fatih and the man who conquered Istanbul was called Mehmed Fatih.

Similarly, there is Fatah, the organization. The name is a reverse acronym of the Organization for the Liberation of Palestine -- arakat al-Taḥrīr l-Filasṭīn. The reference is to the liberation and return of all of today’s Israel – including Judea, Samaria, and the Gaza Strip – to Islamic rule.

This concept of being "open" means that once a land has been conquered and is "open to Islam," it is Muslim forever, even if Muslim control comes to an end. The Muslims ruled Spain from 712 CE until 1492, when the Christians finally expelled them from all of Spain. But in the Muslim mind, though their physical control over Spain ended centuries ago, Spain still belongs to the Muslims and will never be part of the non-Muslim world. Many Muslims, when mentioning Spain, often add the phrase “Allah-Willing, it will again be ruled by Muslims.”

Similarly, there was a time when all of Southeast Europe up to Vienna was under Ottoman rule. The Ottomans saw themselves as Muslims, not Turks. Their defeat in Vienna in 1683 gradually led to the complete Ottoman withdrawal from Southeast Europe, resulting in 1914 to the borders of present-day Turkey. Yet many Turks and other Muslims still talk about the area as being part of the Muslim world. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan still talks about Southeastern Europe as being “part of the Ottoman-Muslim area.”

That brings us to the years 1948-1949, when Israel defeated five Muslim armies. At the Rhodes talks in 1949, the Muslims insisted on the phrase "ceasefire lines" instead of "borders." The word "borders" implies the recognition of the people living there. Jews would have the right to live in Eretz Yisrael. A Muslim would find that unacceptable because those lands should remain Muslim forever.

To the Arabs, there is nothing magical about the lines drawn in the 1948-49 map. Those borders do not matter. The land is completely Muslim. But from the Western point of view, we are talking about how to divide up land and this is the point of pushing for the negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs. However, Netanyahu understands that the Arabs are not talking about Israel’s borders and how to renegotiate them. They are talking about Israel’s existence. And people cannot compromise on their existence.


This issue of borders and Israel's legitimacy caused a problem for Yasser Arafat. The 1993 Oslo Agreement was an interim agreement, not a Peace Treaty. Yet, at the very last moment, Arafat kept changing the terms. He was afraid of what might happen.

Years later, when President Clinton was trying to get Israel and Arafat to sign a Peace Agreement, Arafat was quoted as saying he would not sign because he did not want to end up drinking tea with Sadat. If Arafat had signed, he would have risked assassination like the Egyptian president, whose signing of the Egyptian agreement with Begin was viewed as a treasonous acknowledgment of Israel's right to “Muslim” territory.

There are YouTube videos of Israeli Muslim children -- whose ancestors had been living in Israel for 3 to 4 generations -- telling an Israeli journalist that Israel was Muslim land and that someday Muslims would get it back. 

When the interviewer pointed out his family had been living in Israel for many years, since 1948, the teenager responded that this is what he had been taught, both in school and at home: You Jews have no right to live here and we are going to take our land back from you. There was no issue of rights or that Jews were on the land long before the Arabs arrived in 637-638 CE.

None of that made any difference.
To the Palestinian Arabs, it still doesn't.



Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

AddToAny

EoZ Book:"Protocols: Exposing Modern Antisemitism"

Printfriendly

EoZTV Podcast

Podcast URL

Subscribe in podnovaSubscribe with FeedlyAdd to netvibes
addtomyyahoo4Subscribe with SubToMe

search eoz

comments

Speaking

translate

E-Book

For $18 donation








Sample Text

EoZ's Most Popular Posts in recent years

Hasbys!

Elder of Ziyon - حـكـيـم صـهـيـون



This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For 20 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.

Donate!

Donate to fight for Israel!

Monthly subscription:
Payment options


One time donation:

Follow EoZ on Twitter!

Interesting Blogs

Blog Archive