I guess celebrating the murder of a 19 year old woman is "natural."
Hadar Cohen is, of course, a real martyr, who helped stop what would have been a much worse attack.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
A Border Police officer succumbed to wounds suffered during a shooting and stabbing attack near Jerusalem’s Old City Wednesday, after efforts to save her life at Jerusalem’s Hadassah Hospital Mount Scopus failed. The woman was identified as Hadar Cohen, 19, from Or Yehuda.
Cohen was rushed to hospital in critical condition after she was wounded in the attack shortly after 2 p.m. local time. Paramedics who treated her at the scene said she was fighting for her life. Hospital officials said she was shot in the head. “We succeeded in stabilizing her condition for a time, but her head wound was so severe she never had a chance,” a hospital spokeswoman said.
Another policewomen was in serious but stable condition at the hospital, with wounds all over her body, including her head, the spokeswoman said.
Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat told residents of the capital not to fear “engaging” with suspected Palestinian attackers, after three Palestinians carried out a shooting and stabbing attack, killing one border policewoman and wounding another outside the city’s Damascus Gate on Wednesday afternoon.
Officials said the quick response of security forces in shooting and killing the terrorists prevented a much larger attack by the three.
“I spoke to the brave fighters who were not afraid to engage,” the mayor said of the team of Border Police officers who shot and killed the three Palestinians attackers within moments of the attack. “The preparedness of the policemen is what led to the engagement and saved lives. The residents of Jerusalem need to open their eyes, and in a case like this, not to fear engaging [the attackers]. This vigilance is what will thwart attacks.”
Despite Al Aqsa’s importance to Islam—it is considered the religion’s holiest site outside Saudi Arabia—few Westerners are aware of the content of the sermons, lectures and lessons offered there. Many of these sermons are posted on the mosque’s two official YouTube channels and have been translated from the Arabic by my organization, the Middle East Media Research Institute. What we have found at Al Aqsa is a steady stream of calls for jihad and martyrdom, venomous attacks on Jews, Christians and other non-Muslims, and praise for al Qaeda, Islamic State, or ISIS, and other jihadist groups.
Calls for the destruction of the U.S. and the West, including promises that Islam will take over the world, are other common themes. On July 24 last year, Sheikh Ahmad Al-Dweik—a frequent lecturer at the mosque and Palestinian cleric, like the other religious leaders quoted here—said: “The caliphate will come to be, and the nuclear bomb will be produced,” adding that this future Islamic caliphate—will “fight the U.S. and will bring it down” and “eliminate the West in its entirety.”
On July 6, 2015, Sheikh Muhammad Abed, known as “ Abu Abdallah,” declared that from “the land of the Prophet’s nocturnal journey”—a reference to Jerusalem—“armies will set out to conquer Rome, to conquer Constantinople,” and then he added to the list “Washington and London.” In an Oct. 27 address at Al Aqsa, Sheikh Khaled Al-Maghrabi called for the annihilation of the Jews all over the world, providing justification by quoting the well-known hadith (sayings of the Prophet Muhammad) of the stone and the tree: “Oh Muslim there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.” Earlier at the mosque, on May 29, Sheikh Al-Maghrabi explained why Jews were killed in the Holocaust. “On Passover,” he said, the Jews “would knead the dough for these matzos with children’s blood. When this was discovered, the Israelites were expelled across Europe . . . It got to the point where they were burned in Germany.”
Yesterday was yet another "work accident" where two Hamas terrorists were killed in a tunnel collapse.
Last week seven were killed in a similar collapse.
The tunnel was located "east of Deir al Balah." Since that is not so close to Egypt and not in an urban area, this indicates that this tunnel wasn't meant for smuggling weapons nor as part of a network of urban bunkers used to store weapons and travel from house to house during war.
Meaning that this tunnel could only have been used for one purpose: to attack Israelis by tunneling under the boundary between Gaza and Israel, perhaps towards the communities of Kisufim or Re'im.
Hamas' press release celebrating the deaths of the "martyrs" almost admits this, by saying "the men of the tunnels continue on the same path of jihad and sacrifice, ...both the defensive and offensive tunnels, which gives them the advantage of the resistance and enables them to painfully strike the enemy..."
Here are the latest "martyrs" at their workplace. One was a field commander.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
Member of Knesset Ayman Odeh, who was described as a "rock star" when he spoke at the HaaretzQ conference in New York last December, has officially come out as supporting BDS.
When asked a question about that at a seminar, Odeh responded, "First, I would like to salute the people who are working on BDS, I think this really puts Israel on the spot in world public opinion."
He then made an intentionally vague statement that could be interpreted as possibly "only" supporting the boycott of Jewish businesses in Judea and Samaria, saying, "So long as it is focused on the occupation it is going in the right direction. For instance, the boycott of settlement products is extremely important. " But he didn't limit his comments to only a boycott of settlement products.
He then went on to say that it is important not to boycott Jews, but the Jewish state, saying, "If we can mobilize as many Jews as we could that would be a win for us."
Of course, the people who claim to "only" boycott settlements are really only boycotting Jewish businesses in Judea and Samaria, not those of Israeli Arabs in various industrial zones, as we have discussed previously. Even the BDSers who want to boycott Israel altogether never say to boycott Arab owned businesses in Israel.
The bar for Arabs to be considered moderate or saintly by the mainstream media is quite low. Any Israeli politician who would call for a boycott of Arab or Palestinian products would be considered an extremist and criticized as a bigot, but an Arab who calls to boycott Jewish businesses in Israel - which is what he is doing, and everyone knows it - is considered tantamount to a saint. I guess the fact that he is not calling to stab every Jew in Israel is what passes for "moderate" nowadays.
Watch the video here:
(h/t Yoel)
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
See how much they care about their fellow Arabs? They dully support the Palestinian cause - right up until such support might slightly affect the life of a single Jordanian.
Israel does apparently buy some of the olive oil that grows under PA control. which means that Israel often treats Palestinians better than their brothers in Jordan do. But we already knew that.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
A group of pro-Palestinian sympathizers fanned out across New York City
earlier on Tuesday and distributed thousands of parodied copies of The New York Times bearing headlines and stories that contradict what they claim to be the newspaper's pro-Israel bias in its coverage of the Middle East conflict.
Commuters in the Big Apple could be forgiven for thinking that the "supplement" they were handed was an actual copy of the Grey Lady, since it uses the Times' famous masthead as well as the same headline fonts, page design, and layout. The "supplement" – which is titled "Rethinking our 2015 coverage on Israel-Palestine" - was also posted online. It was even given a Twitter account.
The Jerusalem Post was unable to determine the identity of the individuals behind the initiative. The only response given was that the fake newspaper was the brainchild of followers of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement – an ad hoc alliance of pro-Palestinian activists seeking to punish Israel financially over its policies in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. (h/t Yenta Press)
It’s already been established that one of Hillary Clinton’s most trusted advisers, Sid Blumenthal, sent her dozens of anti-Israel articles, ideas and pieces of advice during her time as secretary of state. But the stream of anti-Israel advice received by Hillary was much more comprehensive than that which came from just one adviser. In the entire batch of Hillary’s emails, you will be hard pressed to find a single email that is sympathetic towards the Jewish state, from any of the people on whom she relied.
The negative, poisonous approach towards Israel throughout this cache of emails shows the atmosphere that Hillary had established around herself. These emails seem to demonstrate that a huge segment of her close advisers and confidants were attacking Israel, condemning Netanyahu, and strategizing about how to force Israel to withdraw from Judea and Samaria at all costs.
Take a look at a sampling of the advice being sent to Hillary from her many advisers.
On January 27, 2016, Human Rights Watch (HRW) released its “World Report 2016,” with a section devoted to “Israel/Palestine: Events of 2015.” Following a long-running pattern, HRW presents a highly selective political narrative and omits any facts that challenge it. Lack of Methodology: Inconsistent Statistics The statistics presented by HRW, in particular those on Israeli casualties, are ambiguous and appear to be internally inconsistent. In the absence of footnotes and given the unclear writing, it is impossible to confirm most of HRW’s data. Distorted Narrative on Gaza
In the Gaza subsection, HRW claims “Israel’s punitive closure of the Gaza Strip, particularly the near-total blocking of outgoing goods, continued to have severe consequences for the civilian population and impeded reconstruction of the 17,000 housing units severely damaged or destroyed during the 2014 war.” Contrary to these claims, delays in Gaza reconstruction were primarily due to Palestinian infighting (Fatah wanted full oversight over the process); failure of donor countries (mostly Arab) in paying pledges; and diversion by Hamas of cement and other materials to rebuild their own infrastructure and terror tunnels. (h/t Yenta Press)
For years, most Iranian athletes have refused to compete against Israeli athletes in international competitions.
And for years, most of the governing authorities of sports federations have turned a blind eye and accepted the excuses of the athletes that they suddenly became "sick" or otherwise couldn't attend.
Now, Ayatollah Khamenei has made it crystal clear that these athletes are doing his bidding, and he has praised them. From Tasnim News:
Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei admired the Iranian athletes who safeguard the religious and moral values in the sports events, irrespective of the delusive wave that may prevail in the international arenas.
The Iranian athletes that explicitly safeguard the values in the championship games do a valued deed, Ayatollah Khamenei said in a gathering of officials involved in holding a congress to commemorate the Iranian athletes that have been martyred.
What is even worthier than standing on the championship stage or raising of the country’s flag is an Iranian athlete’s refusal to wrestle with a Zionist Israeli opponent or a female athlete’s decision to attend the medal award ceremony while respecting the Islamic code of dressing and wearing hijab, Imam Khamenei underlined.
According to the "Supreme Leader," an athlete refusing to compete against Israelis is a greater honor than representing Iran as a champion in international sports.
Nonetheless, Khamenei's words prove that it is no coincidence that Iranian competitors refuse to play against Israelis on principle, not due to illness.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
As most of Elder’s readers will be aware, a
week or so ago the Northeast Conference on Science and Skepticism (NECSS)
rescinded its invitation to Professor Richard Dawkins, the British evolutionary
biologist and high-profile atheist, to address it this year. His offence in its eyes was “his approving
retweeting of a highly offensive video”.
The video in question is this one
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecJUqhm2g08, entitled “Feminists Love
Islamists”. Apparently, when Professor
Dawkins posted it, he was unaware (as I was, too, when, quite coincidentally, I
linked to it on my blog) that the feminist caricature depicted in the animation
is based on an actual American activist who claims to have suffered harassment
over the depiction. When he was apprised
of that fact, Professor Dawkins did the gentlemanly thing and took it down.
“We
believe strongly in freedom of speech and freedom to express unpopular, and
even offensive, views. However, unnecessarily divisive, counterproductive, and
even hateful speech runs contrary to our mission and the environment we wish to
foster at NECSS. The sentiments expressed in the video do not represent the
values of NECSS or its sponsoring organizations.”
‘I have specifically challenged the people in NECSS to
explain exactly what their issue is with the video ("which line exactly
and what's your issue with it?"). They responded that it was inappropriate
because the woman had received abuse, so Dawkins was promoting her furtherabuse. So then i asked them to come on the record here and now that
Dawkins has never received any abuse for being in the spotlight. They refused. Then, I pointed out that Dawkins was currently being mobbed
on twitter due to their actions. "So you've inspired his abuse. Explain
the difference in logical terms please." They never replied.’
I say “fobbed off” because the NECSS
statement quoted does not appear to be referring to the perceived insult to the
women’s movement activist on whom the video is based (and now that I know who
she is and what she looks like I see that it’s obviously meant to be her: she’s
much prettier, by the way, if she’ll forgive me for saying so). The statement, despite its avowed espousal of
freedom of speech, is condemning the
sentiments expressed in the video as “divisive, counterproductive … hate
speech” and distancing itself and its “sponsoring organizations” from those
views.
I don’t know what, if anything, the activist
depicted in the video has had to say regarding Islam and the Quran, but I do
know that there’s a video in the public domain that shows she doesn’t mince
words when expressing her robust contempt for Christianity and the Bible. However, it appears that the NECSS, for all
its adherence to scepticism and what I suppose I may call “the rational,” is
too afraid of offending Islam to be seen to support scepticism and – er –
rational criticism of it, or to tolerate commentary on the irony of Western “feminist”
fondness for an ideology that believes women are inferior to men and must be
appropriately subordinate to men.
Such hypocrisy, such Orwellian doublespeak,
such claptrap, as appears in the NECSS’s statement are par for the course among
leftists, of course. For instance, this
is how that politically correct Israel-bashing British newspaper The Independent (home to such delightful
types as Robert Fisk) reported matters
(http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/richard-dawkins-vdeo-twitter-necss-event-feminism-a6841161.html):
‘The
video … was shared by Dawkins on [January 27], alongside the explainer:
“Obviously doesn’t apply to vast majority of feminists, among whom I count
myself. But the minority are pernicious.”. Dawkins later deleted the tweet but
the NECSS shared a screengrab of it. The distasteful video, which compares
Islamists to feminists and shows two cartoon characters singing about having
things in common, was deleted by Dawkins after he apparently learnt the
‘feminist’ character in the song was based on a real person who was
subsequently “threatened with violence”. Additionally, he later attempted to
defend his post by telling a Twitter user the video was a "joke song
satirising the alliance between radical Islamism and radical feminism".’
Now, I’m not an atheist and I’m no fan of
Professor Dawkins’ atheistic stance, but his views regarding the strange love
that many of today’s “feminists” have towards Islamism are hard for anyone
except a perverse blinkered leftist/”pernicious feminists” to fault. On Twitter Dawkins has fought his corner
convincingly, and includes this very pertinent tweet (video of Islamists
disrupting a speech by an Iranian-born British feminist in the linked article):
Dear @NECSS this is the kind of thing being satirised
by the "Feminists Love Islamists" vid for which you banned me
As for that
strange love that “pernicious feminists” the Western world over have for the
Muslim abusers of their sex, here’s the correct response, hurled by the genuine
feminist Ann-Marie Waters of the UK-based Mothers against Sharia at a bunch of
foolish Danish women in Copenhagen who were there to heckle her speech that
warned of the burgeoning encroachments of Islam on the culture and polity of
Europe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTVpyCOmcKY
‘Young
German women thankfully enjoy historically unprecedented economic and sexual
freedom, with their expensive smartphones and their right to celebrate New
Year’s Eve however they want. The same isn’t always true of young male migrants
exchanging life under repressive regimes, where they may at least have enjoyed
superiority over women, for scraping by at the bottom of Europe’s social and
economic food chain. It is not madness to ask if this has anything to do with
attacks that render confident, seemingly lucky young women humiliated and powerless.
But even if it does, the answer wouldn’t be to halt immigration …’
"The
patriarchy argument is that men beat up women in some cases because they hate
women. But I don't think it is about how
men look at women, it is about how men look at themselves. They have lost their self-esteem, their job,
are welfare-dependent, on drugs or alcohol in their life. They use domestic violence as a coping
mechanism to get over all the other crap they have in their lives. Demonising men and making them feel worse
about themselves is not going to solve the problem."
No prizes
for guessing that the distaff side of the Islam-loving (anti-Israel) Australian
Greens/Left Alliance, as silent concerning the attacks by Muslim gangs on women
in Europe as they are vociferous in condemning the “patriarchal attitudes” and
“misogyny”of white culture, have been down on Latham like the proverbial ton of
bricks. But back to
Europe. Lawyer, writer and blogger Phillip
Mark McGough has written as incisive a commentary on the situation there as I
have ever read
(http://quillette.com/2016/01/18/after-cologne-feminism-is-dead/). Inter alia, he observes:
‘[O]ne of the few tragi-comic chapters in the
horror story of Nazism concerns a strange little organization called the
Association of German National Jews. They were a pro-National Socialist Jewish
group whose membership not only welcomed Hitler’s accession but actively
promoted the self-eradication of Jewish identity and its absorption into the
new, heroic, master-culture represented by the Nazis (it was said of them,
tongue only partly in cheek, that their motto was “down with us”). In 1935,
predictably and forcibly, the group was disbanded. Whereas Stalin had his
useful idiots, for Hitler there could be no useful Jews.
With the above in mind, Marx needs revision.
History repeats itself: First as farce, then as tragedy. No longer the
unofficial motto of a handful of obscure pre-war self-hating Jews, Down With Us
has latterly been adopted (or so it seems) as an official article of policy by
the German government itself. Here is a country whose improvident approach to
Near Eastern immigration these past few months is quite literally threatening
its future as a liberal, progressive, democratically-viable European
nation-state. It wouldn’t take an especially imaginative political cartoonist
to show Frau Merkel as Frankenstein-throwing levers and blowing fuses as she
botches an attempt to graft a million (and counting) Muslim refugees onto the
body politic of an increasingly mutilated society. In politics as in cheap
Gothic literature, such experiments breed monsters.
Some of us are old enough to remember when
refugees consisted almost entirely (and by definition) of the most vulnerable
members of any given country in crisis: Women, children, the elderly, and so forth.
Today, on the other hand, most of the Muslims arriving in Europe from the Near
East seem to be young men of fighting age: Young men whose views regarding
Jews, gays, and of course women are completely at odds with Europe’s liberal
tradition as it’s evolved these past few centuries; a liberal tradition which
Germany, for obvious reasons, has sought to reify in its approach to domestic
and international affairs ever since the end of the war. But thanks in no small
measure to mass Muslim immigration, antisemitism in its most predatory
incarnation is once again the norm on German streets, while misogyny is more or
less accepted, even expected. It is to choke on the irony of it all. In the
name of a long-cherished tradition of tolerance, Germany is becoming savagely
intolerant: Totally unsafe for Jews who dare to display their Judaism in
public, and increasingly unsafe for women who dare even to go out in public at
all after nightfall (or use a swimming pool; or attend a carnival; or do pretty
much anything short of redacting their identity behind a hijab and never
leaving the house again)….
We now know that law-enforcement authorities
throughout Europe have been conniving for some time in similarly clumsy
attempts to neutralize news of the scale of the violence (particularly sexual
violence against women) at large within certain sections of newly-arrived
migrant communities. Across Europe, citizens are being asked by their own
governments to accept that complicity in a conspiracy of silence is the highest
form of tolerance. Fortunately, most people aren’t buying into it. Sadly,
however, some people are: And, oddly enough, not a few of them are women….’
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
Dafna Meir's young daughters win second, third place in gymnastics competition - then break down in tears after returning home.
Natan Meir, the husband of terror victim Dafna, published an emotional Facebook post last night, which has already received numerous shares and reached Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu. Dafna Meir was recently murdered in her Otniel home.
"My sweet daughters, Noa (11.5) and Ahava (10.5) competed in an internal gymnastics competition in Otniel today. They both won medals for second and third place. Two mothers, loving neighbors, escorted them and greatly cheered them up," he wrote. "When evening came, so did the tears - their mother wasn't able to see this achievement. Where is her hug? Why isn't she here to see? I suggested that I would post a picture of them with their medals so they could receive a warm embrace and love from the entire Jewish People."
In the past, both Abbas and his predecessor Yassir Arafat assessed at various points that they were better off cooperating with Hamas against Israel than with Israel against Hamas. Their decisions in 1996, from 2000 to 2007, and intermittently ever since, have had little to do with Israel's positions. Indeed, their shifts from Israel to Hamas have often occurred at times when Israel did the most to support them.
As for Abbas's control over his forces, this too can change on a dime. For years, Palestinian sources have insisted that these forces feel no intrinsic loyalty to Abbas. They stay with Abbas because he pays them.
Ideologically, these men under arms are free floaters. Nothing they believe is a bar for shifting their loyalties to Hamas. More to the point, all the US financial transfers to the PA security forces won't stop any of the US-trained Palestinian forces from moonlighting as Hamas, Fatah or Hezbollah terrorists. They've done it in the past and they will do it again.
The instrumental, and necessarily temporary nature of Palestinian security cooperation with the IDF tells us three things. First, the IDF needs to ditch its current counterterror strategy which is based on the wrongheaded assumption that we can rely on the PA security forces. Central Command needs to develop contingency plans for neutralizing these forces. These contingency plans don’t need to be made public. But to the extent that aspects of the plans can be quietly implemented, they should be implemented as quickly as possible. Second, IDF commanders need to stop praising these hostile forces. At some point in the not so distant future the IDF will be required to fight these forces. When that day comes, the IDF's enthusiastic tributes to their great cooperation with these terror-supporting forces will come back to haunt us. How will we be able to explain why our actions are necessary to allies to whom we have praised these hostile forces? This brings us to the final thing we need to recognize about these Palestinian forces. It was a major strategic blinder for Israel to support the US's decision to train them. By supporting the US training program, Israel has given the US an incentive to deny the hostile nature of these forces. Even worse than guaranteeing that the US will be unwilling to accept that in training these forces its military built a terror army, is that threat these forces pose. Today seven US-trained Palestinian combat battalions are deployed close to Israel's major urban centers. Their fighting skills far surpass anything Israel has had to deal with in campaigns to date against Palestinian terror onslaughts.
The myth that Hamas uses tunnels to smuggle food and other necessities to the "besieged" Gaza Strip has been buried under the rubble of the tunnel that collapsed last week east of Gaza City. The incident, in which seven members of Hamas's armed wing, Ezaddin Al-Qassam, were killed when the tunnel they were working in collapsed, provides further proof that the Islamist movement has stayed true to its charter, which calls for the total destruction of Israel.
The Hamas men who were killed in the tunnel collapse belonged to the movement's elite "Tunnel Unit." According to Ezaddin Al-Qassam, the men were busy repairing one of the tunnels (damaged during the 2014 war with Israel) when it collapsed due to severe weather conditions. Contrary to popular belief, the tunnel was not being renovated to allow Palestinians to smuggle basic goods from Egypt to the Gaza Strip. This was one of many tunnels that Hamas has dug over the past few years to infiltrate Israel and carry out terror attacks.
Hamas makes no secret of the goal of its renovations. Hamas leader Mahmoud Zahar readily admits that the tunnels are being rebuilt to target Israel.
In the wake of last week's politically motivated "reminder notice" that goods from Jewish settlements cannot be labeled "Made in Israel," EoZ reader Irene emailed to the US Customs and Border Protection and asked them a simple question - are there any rules that goods from Moroccan-occupied Western Sahara be labeled as such, or are they labeled as Morocco as their country of origin?
The answer:
Thank you for your outreach. Currently, I’m not aware of any C/O marking requirements from Western Sahara.
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.
Randy Mitchell
(Acting) Director, Commercial Operations and Entry Division
Trade Policy and Programs, Office of International Trade
1400 L Street NW 4th Floor, Washington DC
202-863-6532
Randy.mitchell@cbp.dhs.gov
In fact, the official State Department policy towards Western Sahara is completely different from its policy towards Judea and Samaria:
The United States’ policy toward the Western Sahara has remained consistent for many years. The United States has made clear that Morocco’s autonomy plan is serious, realistic, and credible, and that it represents a potential approach that could satisfy the aspirations of the people in the Western Sahara to run their own affairs in peace and dignity.
Autonomy - sort of like what Palestinian Arabs enjoy today which is considered by the UN's Secretary General to be so oppressive that terror attacks are a natural reaction.
Moroccan settlements in Western Sahara - whose population now exceeds that of the indigenous Sahwari people - are not considered a problem at all. The Geneva Conventions that everyone cites regarding Jews moving voluntarily to their historic lands do not seem to apply to Morocco moving hundreds of thousands of people to occupied territory.
Can you say "double standards?"
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
The Palestinian Authority's security cooperation with Israel is being pushed to the brink after the recent attack by an off-duty Palestinian staff sergeant who shot and wounded three Israeli soldiers, analysts say.
The Sunday morning attack, which took place at a Ramallah-area checkpoint, was the most recent to be carried out against Israeli forces. The attacker was identified as Amjad Sukkari, 34, from Jamaain village in the northern Nablus district. He was shot dead at the scene.
Thousands of people took to the streets of Nablus on Monday for Sukkari’s funeral after Israeli forces, in what was arguably a surprise move, released his body just a few hours after the shooting.
Two of Sukkari’s brothers, both Palestinian police officers, carried the casket from the Nablus-area hospital to the city’s cemetery as crowds waved flags and chanted “martyr”.
While some PA officials were present at the procession, and some mourners were seen waving Fatah flags, the PA officials have stayed mute on the matter. Several PA offices, including the PA’s security spokesperson Adnan Dmiri, all declined MEE’s repeated requests for comment.
In stark contrast, Hamas and Islamic Jihad have both come out in support of Sukkari, publically endorsing his actions and calling them a natural reaction of occupation.
“This attack showcases the rejection of security coordination with the occupation, even among members of the PA security forces,” Hamas movement's spokesman, Sami Abu Zuhri, said on Sunday.
The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine – a left faction of the PLO – dubbed the attack a “heroic operation,” and called for the end of PA security coordination with Israel, saying the attack by a PA police officer was “a slap in the face of security coordination with the occupation”.
The PA chose to honour him with a military funeral, a move that was in question until a few hours before the burial.
According to Islamic rites, a body should be buried on the day of death before sunset, but the funeral was delayed in order to wait and see if the PA would come through with the official burial, his brother told MEE.
The Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades (Fatah) also praised the attack, and used the same words that Hamas and Islamic Jihad used to describe it - as a "natural reaction" to occupation.
UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon used very similar terminology to describe Palestinian terror attacks, saying that it is "human nature to react to occupation."
While Ban didn't create that terminology - terror groups have been calling their attacks "natural reactions" to Israel for years - so far in this uprising the reason for the attacks in Arabic have been either the Al Aqsa Mosque or revenge for other people killed while trying to kill Jews. It seems that when terror groups are using this terminology today, they are relying on the idea that Ban Ki Moon has legitimized "natural reaction to occupation" as now a UN-sanctioned reason to attack Jews.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
During the funeral for the seven Hamas terrorists who were killed in a tunnel collapse last week, Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades spokesman Abu Obeida arrived to the ceremony on what he bragged was a locally-produced Hamas tank, ready to be used to fight the Israelis.
The link has a video:
Here's another one:
Fatah had a field day with this. For one thing, they noticed that the "tank" had tires that look a lot like there is an SUV underneath:
Fatah created a poster that says "Can they excite the feelings of their supporters with...sewer pipes and fiberglass panels?"
Fatah said that the apparent use of sewer pipes shows that Hamas has no interest in the well-being of Gazans who, they say, are witnessing these absurd displays while waiting for their homes to be built.
Hamas' "tank" is admittedly pretty pathetic.
This is the sort of thing that Western media would be merciless in ridiculing - if the butt of the joke wasn't Hamas, which can do ugly things to their reporters.
(h/t Ibn Boutros)
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
Members and supporters of Breaking the Silence—the group of former Israeli soldiers who accuse the IDF of committing immoral and illegal acts in the West Bank—have on several occasions likened their campaign to that of the dissidents who fought for human rights in the Soviet Union. In 2010, for example, Breaking the Silence was on a short-list of three finalists for the European Parliament’s Sakharov Prize, which recognizes leading human-rights activists around the world, and defenders of the controversial nomination hailed the group as an heir to Andrei Sakharov’s legacy.
In this view, the struggle to end Israel’s military presence in the territories by bringing international pressure to bear on the Jewish state is analogous to the struggle to bring down the Iron Curtain by calling the world’s attention to Soviet repression. Unfortunately, the comparison is deeply flawed. For one thing, it completely ignores the distinction—so clear and so important to Soviet dissidents—between dictatorship and democracy, and with it the fundamental differences between the Soviet Union and Israel. Soviet dissidents set out to democratize a dictatorial regime, to create the kind of representative institution with which Israel is already blessed. Because such institutions were entirely absent in the USSR, we had no choice but to rely on external forces to induce the regime to respond to our claims. Breaking the Silence, by contrast, sets out to bypass an existing democratic government and resolve a controversial political issue by means of international pressure. It is of course legitimate to believe that Israel’s military presence in the West Bank should be ended immediately. But it is equally legitimate to believe that such a withdrawal would be dangerous and even catastrophic for the state. This is a political question that should be decided by Israel’s citizens through their elected representatives, not by a small group of self-appointed prophets and their chorus of foreign supporters.
Anyone who doubts the gravity of the threat to Israel and Jewish students on American college campuses could have stopped by the Brown University campus here on Thursday night. Students and community members attempting to listen to a conversation about Jewish identity between actor Michael Douglas and Soviet dissident turned Israeli political figure Natan Sharansky had their event intruded on by loud chants of “free, free, Palestine” from protesters outside.
Don’t blame Brown. The event was crawling with university and city police, along with Mr. Sharansky’s formidable security detail. The protesters have as much right to speak on campus as Mr. Sharansky, 68, and Mr. Douglas, 71, do. Though they do not necessarily have the right to speak so loudly and closely as to drown out the Jewish identity event, or to distribute inside the lecture hall, as they did, a slickly worded handout accusing Israel of “ethnic cleansing” and libeling Mr. Sharansky as “an infamous anti-African racist” while falsely representing the flier as a “program addition.”
The protesters failed to stop Mr. Sharansky from delivering his message, though the noise they generated outside could be heard inside the lecture hall for what seemed like a long while. But it’s nonetheless a sad moment for American higher education, for Israel, and for world Jewry when a campus conversation between an American actor with a Jewish identity and a human rights hero known for surviving nine years in the Soviet gulag is greeted — before it even happens — by an op-ed in the student newspaper summoning a rally “to speak out against this justification of Israeli crimes.” It’s a measure of the movement’s virulence that it targeted not an appearance by an Israeli general or a foreign policy talk but rather a discussion about Jewish identity.
Neither the government in Ramallah nor the government in Gaza City has democratic legitimacy. Mahmoud Abbas, president of the Palestinian Authority, has just entered the 11th year of a four-year term. Parliamentary elections have not been held in the West Bank or Gaza since 2006. And this deadlock has nothing to do with Israel. The question arises: Why does France assume a lack of progress in hypothetical talks between Israel and the Palestinians would be Israel’s fault? Yes, there are partners in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition who are adamantly opposed to a two-state solution, such as Bayit Yehudi. But Netanyahu has repeatedly stated his support for the idea and offered to meet with Abbas.
The world know what Israel is able to offer, based on the history of the Wye and Camp David negotiations. And it is a generous, reasonable proposal. If the Palestinians turned it down yet again, then wouldn’t France’s natural response be to condemn Palestinian intransigence? By threatening to unilaterally recognize a Palestinian state, the French announcement only ensures the Palestinians will dig their heels in further in their rejectionist stance.
No people has an unalienable right to statehood, particularly when this state would quickly become yet another of the many failed Arab states of the Middle East. National self-determination is a privilege that must be earned. Palestinians have a lot of work to do before they are ready. France should know this. Then again they should also know better than to provide a state welcome full of pomp and ceremony to the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
That’s where the lame duck Obama administration comes in.
The Palestinians presume that after more talks fail and the French join the chorus of nations recognizing their aspirations, the next step will be another battle at the United Nations. Up until now every attempt to force either Palestinian statehood or a requirement for an Israeli pullout from the West Bank and Jerusalem has been vetoed by the United States. But if Security Council were to declare Israel’s continued presence in the territories illegal — something that would make a travesty of international law as well as ensuring even more Palestinian terrorism rather than peace — that would be a serious escalation of the conflict. The fact that France, a permanent Security Council member, would be behind the effort might persuade Obama that the time would be ripe for an abandonment of the Israelis at the UN.
Despite the lip service he pays the relationship, Obama has been clearly itching for a chance to force Israel out of the territories in the vain expectation that this would encourage Palestinians to make peace. The administration’s endorsement of a European Union effort to label Israeli goods made in the West Bank and Jerusalem is not only hypocritical but also brings the West one crucial step closer to a boycott of Israel. A UNSC resolution on the West Bank would be the logical — if damaging — conclusion to be drawn from everything Obama has done and said about the Middle East.
Pundits may think the president would refrain from any move that could antagonize Jewish voters during the fall election campaign. But if such a resolution were to come up for a vote after Election Day in November there would be no political impediment to a U.S. move that would be the logical conclusion to an eight-year effort to delegitimize Israel’s negotiating stance and to create more “daylight” between the U.S. and Israel. That’s a scenario Israel and its friends ought to be worried about far more than a meaningless gesture by the French.
While the irrational hatred of Israel and Zionism is often a good indicator of a hatred of Jews as well, use of "anti-semitism" is often a distraction from the argument being made, and overuse of that term waters it down over time. Misoziony , although I'm not sure how it is pronounced, is a word that may solve this problem. Miso- is a prefix, based on the Greek misos, that means "hatred." Misoziony - the hatred of Israel and Zionism - is a fundamentally irrational loathing that is just as disgusting as anti-semitism but without the baggage. Misozionists like to say, for example, that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is not anti-semitic because he allows a number of Jews to live in relative peace in Iran, as long as they keep in their place. Arguing that this is but a more subtle form of anti-semitism - which it is - takes away from the prime argument that Ahmadinejad singlemindedly wants to see the Israel utterly destroyed. Arab and Islamic anti-semitism is generally more subtle nowadays than their naked misoziony. Hating Israel in grossly disproportionate ways compared to the behavior of any other nation is a sickness that is closely related to anti-semitism but it is not identical. Misoziony shows itself to be no less reprehensible than pure anti-semitism, because the desire to see the destruction of Israel is as disgusting as any bigotry. Israel-bashers like to claim that Zionists use the term "anti-semitism" as a club to crush all criticism of Israel. The problem is, of course, that the same crowd uses the claim of Zionist use of anti-semitism as a means to avoid discussing real issues. The word misoziony can neatly solve that problem and can help re-focus the arguments back on their fundamentally untenable bases. Pointing out misoziony can help to sharpen the debate and point out the basic irrationality of the Israel-bashers.
It didn't catch on, of course, but I think it is still useful to describe things like this AP article:
Israeli anthropologist Dan Rabinowitz is a leader in his field, heading a prestigious school of environmental studies at Tel Aviv University, authoring dozens of publications and holding visiting teaching positions over the years at leading North American universities.
But the British-educated Rabinowitz fears that his younger counterparts may not enjoy the same professional opportunities for a very personal reason: They are Israeli.
As a global boycott movement against Israeli universities gains steam, Israeli professors say they are feeling the pressure from their colleagues overseas. Although the movement ostensibly targets universities, not individuals, Israeli academics say they are often shunned at the personal level. They experience snubs at academic conferences, struggle to get recommendations and can experience difficulty publishing their work in professional journals.
"This is highly personal and personalized," said Rabinowitz.
Peretz Lavie, president of the Technion, Israel's premier science and technology university, said the effect of such decisions has so far been minimal.
Nonetheless, Lavie said the boycott movement has become a top concern for Israeli university leaders, particularly as it gains support at the "ground level" from U.S. student unions and academic associations.
"There may be a domino effect," he said. "If we do not deal with it, it will be a major problem."
Lavie is now leading a battle against the boycott. While acknowledging that Israeli government policies are open to criticism, he said that holding universities responsible for them is unfair and asked why countries with abysmal human rights records, such as Iran and Saudi Arabia, have been spared.
"We have the feeling that these movements treat Israel differently than any other country in the world," he said.
Ya think?
Rabinowitz counts the November vote by the anthropological association as one of the most painful chapters of his career. He said he personally tried to alter the boycott resolution twice — only to be rejected with little or no debate. He said the rejection by his colleagues was a "defining moment" for him. In a statement, the association confirmed Rabinowitz's account, noting that the meeting was "highly charged."
Ed Liebow, the association's executive director, said the organization felt "a strong commitment" to take some sort of action. "The one thing we can't do is nothing," he said. The measure goes to the association's more than 10,000 members for a vote this spring.
Although the American anthropologists have never before proposed a boycott of academic institutions, the association said it commonly takes public stands against governments accused of restricting academic freedom. It recently sent a letter to leaders of Turkey, criticizing them for allegedly curbing scholars there.
Ilana Feldman, a professor of anthropology at George Washington University and a boycott supporter, said the proposal, if passed, would not impede professors "in any way" from working with Israeli scholars.
Rabinowitz, however, said it is impossible to distinguish between a person and his institution, which becomes part of one's professional identity.
Israeli academics say such feelings are increasingly common.
Rachelle Alterman, a professor emeritus of urban planning at the Technion, said she still has strong working relationships with colleagues around the world, but the pro-boycott camp is a "rising minority" in academia.
Alterman said she has begun to feel a "coldness" from some colleagues at conferences that was not there in the past. She said some colleagues refuse to attend conferences in Israel, and editors at professional journals tell her it is difficult to find people willing to review papers by Israeli academics.
"I call it the dark matter. It's there all the time, but elusive, hard to spot," she said.
In one recent case, a British colleague coolly rejected a request to assist one of her graduate students.
"I am afraid that as part of the institutional boycott being observed by some academics in relation to Israeli organisations I am unable to help with your request," the British professor wrote in an email.
And then, of course, everyone agrees who is the real evil in Israel:
Rabinowitz said the boycott efforts will backfire by undermining Israeli moderates and playing into the hands of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's hard-line government.
"It is the best present they can give Netanyahu and the radical right in Israel," he said.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For 20 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.
The New York Times Backs Holocaust-Gaza Comparison
-
It’s one thing to report on recorded testimonies, but it’s another to use
non-governmental organizations (NGOs) with clear agendas to endorse these
compari...
Ta-Nehisi Coates Trades Blackness for Wokeness
-
There is a remarkable moment in the latest unremarkable woke cash grab of a
book of essays by Ta-Nehisi Coates. The single most successful black
nationa...
Yom Kippur
-
[image: Dry Bones cartoon, Yom Kippur, sins, Israel, UN,]
Thge UN is a failing organization.
* * * Dry Bones cannot fail. . . *NOT IF WE HAVE YOUR HELP.*
...
It really is time to shut down BBC Verify
-
BBC Verify is promoted as BBC’s flagship ‘fact checking’ news service. But
as you will see below – BBC Verify is a cheap, amateurish, propaganda
device- ...
The Elder Scrolls 6 - everything we know so far
-
The Elder Scrolls 6's release date has still not been revealed. In fact,
we've not heard much of anything since it was revealed over six years ago.
Aside f...
Al-Aqsa as "exclusive property"
-
In his UN General Assembly meeting address, Mahmoud Abbas said:
*Al-Aqsa Mosque and its surroundings, ladies and gentlemen, are the
exclusive property of...
One Choice: Fight to Win
-
Yesterday Israel preempted a potentially disastrous attack by Hezbollah on
the center of the country. Thirty minutes before launch time, our aircraft
destr...
Yom Hashoah 5784 – 2024
-
Israel’s Yom Hashoah began at sundown this evening with the annual ceremony
at Yad Vashem with torches lit in memory of the 6 million Jewish victims of
the...
Closing Jews Down Under Website
-
With a heavyish heart I am closing down the website after ten years.
It is and it isn’t an easy decision after 10 years of constant work. The
past...
‘Test & Trace’ is a mirage
-
Lockdown II thoughts: Day 1 Opposition politicians have been banging on
about the need for a ‘working’ Test & Trace system even more loudly than
the govern...