Monday, October 16, 2017
Elder of Ziyon
During a period when Israel’s foes are taking advantage of increasing
radicalism on college campuses and elsewhere, it is easy to panic or fall
into despair as each news cycle brings more tales of terror for Israel and her
supporters. But if there’s one thing
that separates the effective from the ineffective warrior (political or otherwise),
it’s the ability to skip over panic and get down to business.
Yes, the news is indeed frightening (especially when your
news feed has been customized to only deliver tales of your political enemies
behaving badly). And factors such as
such as how decisions get made in Tehran or the Kremlin (or the White House for
that matter) are beyond the control of any activist or group of activists, no
matter how talented. But the first rule
of warfare is to understand what is in your control so you can make choices
based on concrete reality, vs. wishful (or fear-driven) thinking.
Working from the top, the general zeitgeist is that the
election of a controversial American President has galvanized elements of the
political Left to find common cause.
While not a problem in and of itself (why shouldn’t political allies
come together to fight a political foe?), the tendency of the ruthless (whether
Leninist or anti-Zionist) to rise to power within such coalitions means such
groups are likely to turn against Israel – if not immediately, then eventually.
The Right has also been doing coalition building and
political agitation, of course. But
since the most significant anti-Zionist
agitation has been coming from SJP types and their intersectional allies, at
least for now we must focus on the actual vs. potential enemy. Any good military will devote a subset of its
energy to anticipating and planning for future threats. But doing so at the expense of winning the
battle you’re currently fighting is folly.
With that big picture in place, we must also keep in mind
Tip O’Neill’s maxim that “All politics is local.” It’s easy to lose sight of this central truth
in an era when a food coop boycott in Brooklyn makes international news, or a
church divestment resolution triggers tweets from Detroit to Doha. But the reason why there was a boycott or
divestment motion in that particular coop or church is because local anti-Israel
activists within each community organized and sustained campaigns for
them.
This means that understanding the local situation takes top
priority. Is there a divestment row
brewing at your school? Which groups are
behind it? How many members do they
have? Are those numbers real, or just
boasts or Facebook joins? Most
importantly – who leads the opposition and are they any good?
By good, I mean, are they able to sustain coalitions or
political activities for long periods of time, present a responsible face to
those they are trying to convince (like unaffiliated students, administrators
or reporters) and think and plan strategically?
Or is there success driven primarily by aggression and charisma – both
strong sources of power, but more limited ones than patience, empathy and a
strategic mindset.
Oh, and if the opposition has decent leadership, are they
going to be around or are they about to go on exchange program next semester
(in which case the next question should be who is in charge when they leave and
how effective are they?).
If you have the patience, this
short book goes into more detail about analyzing battlefield forces and
landscapes, and elements of effective strategic thinking. But in the particular period we’re living
through when Israel’s foes are trying to use the current moment to gain control
over the entire Left end of the political spectrum and turn it against us, some
specific questions to ask include:
- · - How much radical activity is really going on in your community? While partisans on both sides of the Right-Left divide have a stake in inflating the significance of such activity (either to condemn or celebrate it), it is your job to determine if that latest march or 20-page list of demands represents a genuine power play vs. a political stunt.
- · - What is the response of the rest of the community to the radicals? Are they supportive, hostile, indifferent? Fear of being condemned as racist, sexist or something-else-ist might make it difficult for community members to honestly express what they think. But time spent really listening to people other than allies and enemies can help you better evaluate honest community attitudes.
- · - Are there opportunities to cleave coalitions among our foes, or prevent them from forming? There is, after all, no requirement that every Left-leaning individual and organization must drop on their knees before the Palestine uber alles agenda. And there are various ways of making that known, from recruiting confident and vocal minorities and feminists to openly question the assumptions behind intersectional alliances, to creating your own coalitions to focus on providing genuine help (vs. just slogans) to the needy and oppressed.
Most importantly, the successful warrior is a happy warrior
able to project a spirit of confidence vs. fear and despair. Our enemy thrives on other people’s weakness,
following Lenin’s maxim to probe with bayonets, advancing when they encounter
mush and retreating when they meet steel.
This means that no matter how overwhelmed you might feel at any given time,
never let your foe see anything but impenetrable metal.
