Col Kemp: Call off the Paris conference
The planned Paris conference was born out of good will, but it comes at a very bad moment. On the one hand, Resolution 2334, recently adopted by the U.N. Security Council, has endorsed the Palestinian narrative that the core of the problem comes down to a geographical issue: the settlements in the West Bank and the 1967 borders. Yet this interpretation does not hold water. Every time Israel has swapped land for peace, it has only earned more terrorism. The most striking and visible case is the Gaza Strip: Since Israel carried out its unilateral withdrawal in 2005, Hamas has ruled in that territory with total impunity and the attacks on Israel have only continued. Thousands of rockets and missiles have been launched from Gaza against civilian populations in Israel.French Ambassadors Declare War on Israel
It is easy to believe that the conflict can be reduced to an issue of territories. But that's false. The reality is different.
The real problem is that the Palestinians don't want to give an inch of what the Israelis want, namely, that they recognize Israel as the state of the Jewish people. It is as basic as that; nothing more, nothing less. To demand that Israel renounce any claim to the Western Wall and other places at the heart of Judaism is not just historical nonsense, it is the wrong move. The Palestinians demand east Jerusalem today; tomorrow they will want the entire city, and later, the entire country. In fact, that's what their propaganda teaches. Their school textbooks, all paid for with EU taxpayers' money, are full of hatred, incitement to violence, and clear denial of Israel and the Jewish people.
Peace cannot come out of incitement to hatred and violence. It would be good if the participants in Paris would demand that Palestinian leaders end their campaigns and indoctrination against Israel and assume once and for all that Israel was created as the homeland of the Jewish people and that it will continue to be so. The sooner they accept that, the better, so they can reach an agreement with Jerusalem on the drawing of borders.
In the same spirit, this international conference would do well to demand that the Palestinian state have transparent institutions, free from corruption, and defend tolerance and peaceful coexistence with neighboring Israel. No liberal democracy should be satisfied if what it establishes and recognizes is a nest of corruption, nepotism, discrimination, and violence.
For our ambassadors, terrorism does not exist in "Palestine". They just whisper Quixotically about "the need for security" for Israel.Melanie Phillips: Perfidious Boris?
The obvious conclusion is that they are just trying to hide their own detestation of Israel behind the Arab one.
The problem is not Jewish "settlers" in "Palestine". Before 1967, there were no settlements, then what was the Palestine Liberation Organization "liberating" when it was created in Cairo in 1964? The answer, as the PLO was the first to admit, was "Palestine" -- meaning the entire state of Israel, regarded by many Arabs as just one big settlement. Just look any Palestinian map.
The problem is that these ambassadors are not as dangerous to Israel as they are to Europe and the free world, as they keep on succumbing to the demands of Islam.
First of all, the Israeli settlements are not illegal. They are lawful several times over under international law which the UK Foreign Office persistently and wilfully misrepresents. Second, this profession of the government’s “strong support for a Jewish homeland in Israel” is simply nauseating in view of the fact that resolution 2334 falsely declares that Judaism’s holiest places in Jerusalem, to which the Jews alone have the overwhelming legal, historical and moral claim as the only people for whom Jerusalem was ever their national capital, belong to the Palestinians.
The UN resolution of which Boris Johnson is so proud says in effect that it is illegal for Jews to pray at the Western Wall. It is therefore not just a strike against Israel but a strike against Judaism itself.
Not satisfied with this hypocrisy, Boris Johnson added for good measure that Britain had supported UN resolution 2334 “only because it contained new language pointing out the infamy of terrorism that Israel suffers every day, not least on Sunday, when there was an attack in Jerusalem.”
But resolution 2334, of which Boris Johnson boasts, contributed to the atmosphere of incitement in which last Sunday’s murderous truck-ramming attack, which claimed the lives of four young Israelis and wounded many more, took place. The Palestinians – who thanked Britain and the other supporters of 2334 in a cartoon which threatened more violence against Israel – have ramped up their incitement to murder as a direct consequence of the UN having now endorsed in 2334 their exterminatory lies. Israeli officials have also observed that there has been a sharp rise in the number of violent attacks in the disputed territories, primarily rock-throwing incidents, since 2334 was passed.
No more funny guy, Boris. Perfidious Albion redux, indeed.