Zelenskyy's Contempt: For Once, Israel Isn't Special (Judean Rose)

Disclaimer: the views expressed here are solely those of the author, weekly Judean Rose columnist Varda Meyers Epstein.

I watched, open-mouthed as Zelenskyy became argumentative, even hostile to the vice president and president in front of the press. It was so shocking I didn’t even have words for what I was seeing. “Oh my God,” I said over and over again like a mantra. “What an idiot! Why???”

I put the knife down, afraid I’d nick myself. I’d been checking two kilograms of dried apricots for bugs so I could make hamantaschen filling. My phone blared Zelenskyy, its tiny screen propped against a vase of Shabbos flowers in front of which I sat with my cutting board and a mound of wrinkly, plump and fragrant fruit. And a knife. 

But the apricots could wait. This needed my full attention.  

There was so much going on that I didn’t know where to look. Trump’s face got so red I thought he would plotz. I sincerely hope he wouldn’t croak. But if two assassination attempts didn’t take him down, neither would some weaselly little guy with a Napoleon complex in fake fatigues.

Zelenskyy had really stepped in it this time—it was one for the history books. If you ever meet someone who doesn’t understand the term “own goal,” just tell them about the time Zelenskyy, who should have been humbly begging Trump to save his country, self-eviscerated in the Oval Office in front of the press—and everyone else. In the world.

But this wasn’t the first time an ungrateful Zelenskyy decided to FAFO what an American president would do when treated with disdainful impertinence. He did it to Biden, too:

It’s become routine since Russia invaded Ukraine: President Joe Biden and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy speak by phone whenever the U.S. announces a new package of military assistance for Kyiv.

But a phone call between the two leaders in June played out differently from previous ones, according to four people familiar with the call. Biden had barely finished telling Zelenskyy he’d just greenlighted another $1 billion in U.S. military assistance for Ukraine when Zelenskyy started listing all the additional help he needed and wasn’t getting. Biden lost his temper, the people familiar with the call said. The American people were being quite generous, and his administration and the U.S. military were working hard to help Ukraine, he said, raising his voice, and Zelenskyy could show a little more gratitude.

These were not isolated incidents. This is what Zelenskyy does. He did it to Trump and JD Vance. He did it to Biden. And he did it to Israel, too.

Back in 2022, I noted that in his address to the Knesset, Zelenskyy rubbed Israelis the wrong way when he claimed that Ukrainians saved Jews during WWII:

Zelenskyy has left us Israelis with a bad taste in our mouths. He’s a hero the world over, and we want to like him, too. But it’s difficult for Israelis to like him after the things he said in his address to the Israeli Knesset on Sunday. President Zelenskyy hit all the wrong notes, pointing an accusatory finger at Israel with one criticism after another.

Zelenskyy criticized Israel for not doing enough to help Ukraine, for not supplying the right kind of aid, for not applying pressure to Russian businesses. The Ukrainian president asserted that Ukrainians saved Jews during the Holocaust, while Jews have turned their backs on the Ukrainian people.

“One can keep asking why we can't get weapons from you. Or why Israel has not imposed strong sanctions against Russia. Why it doesn’t put pressure on Russian business. But it is up to you, dear brothers and sisters, to choose the answer. And you will have to live with this answer, people of Israel.

“Ukrainians have made their choice. Eighty years ago. They rescued Jews. That is why the Righteous Among the Nations are among us. People of Israel, now you have such a choice.”

Now I was listening to the same record on repeat. Whatever America gave him, it was not enough for Zelenskyy. Trump gave him javelins? Zelensky said not enough. Biden gave him money. Zelensky said not enough. Israel took in more Ukrainian refugees than any other country and Zelenskyy said it was not enough.

Instead we got a lecture. Just as Trump and JD Vance got a lecture. Also from 2022: 

President Zelenskyy accused Israel of indifference, of refusing to choose sides, and of immorality, too, questioning whether Israel’s imagined inaction was premeditated, for which, he suggested, we’d one day be held to account in the final battle between good and evil.

“Can you explain why we still turn to the whole world, to many countries for help? We ask you for your help? What is it? Indifference? Premeditation? Or mediation without choosing a party? I will leave you a choice of answer to this question. And I will note only one thing — indifference kills. Premeditation is often erroneous. Mediation between states is possible, but not between good and evil.”

Zelenskyy hates to say thank you, but he sure does like to point a finger at others, accusing them of both apathy and conversely, at the same time, premeditated evil. Going back to the Oval Office disaster, remember when Zelenskyy tried to tell JD Vance and Trump what they’d “feel?”

Zelenskyy: First of all, during the war, everybody has problems, even you. You have nice ocean and don’t feel [it] now, but you will feel it in the future.

Trump: You don’t know that. Don’t tell us what we’re going to feel. We’re trying to solve a problem. Don’t tell us what we’re going to feel.

Zelenskyy: I am not telling you, I am answering …

Vance: That’s exactly what you’re doing …

Trump, raising his voice: You’re in no position to dictate what we’re going to feel. We’re going to feel very good and very strong.

You could feel the disdain coming off Zelenskyy in the combative way he spoke to the president and vice president and you could see it in his demeanor. I would even call it hatred. For the west? I don’t know. Maybe he hates everyone outside of Ukraine, which begs the question: why is he begging everyone outside of Ukraine to give him help as if it’s an honor to help him, just a sour-faced little autocrat.

Zelenskyy has a God complex. He’s smug. In his mind, he’s the only one who’s awake to what plays out on the world stage. He’s the only one who’s smart. Everyone else is oblivious. Ignorant, beneath him, and bad.

I was appalled back in 2022, when during his address to the Israeli Knesset, Zelenskyy drew a comparison between Putin’s invasion of Ukraine to Hitler’s Final Solution:

 “When the Nazi party raided Europe and wanted to destroy everything. Destroy everyone and leave nothing from us, nothing from you. They called it ‘the final solution to the Jewish issue.'

“You remember that. And I’m sure you will never forget! Listen to what is sounding now in Moscow. Hear how these words are said again: ‘Final solution.’ But already in relation, so to speak, to us, to the ‘Ukrainian issue.'”

Did the Ukrainian president think that because he was born a Jew, he could say this dreadful thing—that he could blatantly compare a land grab to the attempted annihilation of a people?

Zelenskyy seems unable or unwilling to shove aside his considerable ego long enough to consider the off-putting effects of his words on others. He doesn’t seem to realize that his contempt is obvious to those of whom he is contemptuous, which appears to be everyone but Ukrainians. And that contempt has trickled down to Zelenskyy administration officials, or as I called it in 2022, a rot that spreads from the head down:

It is now an unavoidable conclusion that criticism of Israel from Ukrainian officials over the past several weeks has come from the top down. From the Ukrainian ambassador to Israel finding fault with Israeli aid and Israel’s handling of Ukrainian refugees, to Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba accusing El Al of evading sanctions by accepting payments “soaked in Ukrainian blood,” it’s all a part of the antisemitic party line. The Ukrainian fish, like every other fish, rots from the head down.

Israel might have hoped that President Zelenskyy, being a Jew himself, might refrain from fomenting another Chmielnicki-style Uprising. Instead, the hate begins with Zelenskyy, trickling down to the others to a man. Zelenskyy may not be motivated by antisemitism, but unfortunately, he inspires it in others.

What Zelenskyy wanted from Israel was patently ridiculous. He wanted Israel to do things that would anger Russia and Iran, two countries already not very kindly disposed toward Israel, to say the least. Zelenskyy actually expected Israel to give him arms and chastised the Jewish State from the halls of the Knesset for not doing so.

Well, Zelenskyy may be suicidal, witness that Oval Office fiasco, but demanding that Israel commit suicide with him? That was a bit much. As I wrote in 2022, “For most Israelis, there’s no contest. We choose to protect our own people from terror and worse over the things Zelenskyy wants us to do for a people with a long and well known history of antisemitic cruelty.”

Zelenskyy wanted Israel to ignore the harm that supplying him with weapons would inevitably do to the Jewish State. But Israel needs to look out for Israel before looking out for Ukraine or anyone else. Zelenskyy tried to make it a moral choice: if Israel doesn’t help him we’re aligned with Putin. And he tried to do the same thing to President Trump.

But just as Israel wasn’t having any of it, neither was President Trump, who told a reporter during that disastrous Oval Office meeting, “I'm not aligned with Putin. I'm not aligned with anybody. I'm aligned with the United States of America, and for the good of the world, I'm aligned with the world, and I want to get this thing over with.” 

Zelenskyy thinks the world—and its leaders—owe him a living. He’s not grateful for a thing, believing he is more than entitled to whatever and however much you might give him. Well, ingratitude may be Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s middle name. But it’s not mine.

I’m actually a little grateful to Zelenskyy, right now. After seeing that exchange with Trump and Vance, I know that for once, Israel’s not special! Zelenskyy treats everyone badly, even the president of the United States!

Can it be that Israel has finally joined the family of man?

---

---

Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon! "He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024) PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

 

Read More

Stiff-Necked and Unbroken: Hostages Seek God in Gaza (Judean Rose)

Disclaimer: the views expressed here are solely those of the author, weekly Judean Rose columnist Varda Meyers Epstein.

We’ve all heard of people spurning God when tragedy strikes. They say things like, “God didn’t help me when I needed help. Therefore he doesn’t exist,” or, “If there were a God, He wouldn’t have made the Holocaust,” or, “If there is a God, He’s not a loving God but a cruel God and I refuse to worship him.”

But the Israeli Jews taken captive on October 7 experienced no such crisis of faith. They turned to, rather than away from God, embracing Jewish law as best they could. The hostages understood that their persecution was due to the fact that they were Jews. So they doubled down. Because the Jews are a stiff-necked people.

It doesn’t matter where you start out as a Jew. When push comes to shove, we know what to do. Many of the hostages were disconnected from religion prior to being kidnapped. Keith Siegel, for example.

Growing up in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Siegel attended a Conservative synagogue with his family. But after 40 years on a secular kibbutz, Keith had pretty much forgotten any of the prayers he’d learned as a child. This is not to say that Siegel had turned away from God. He probably just hadn’t thought much about religion or God during those years.

But held captive in a Gaza tunnel, Keith Siegel began saying the Shema, an affirmation of faith: “Hear oh Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one.”

Siegel knew that what had happened to him, had happened to him because he was a Jew. It shifted something inside of him, something that called out to him in the haze of the endless starvation and torture, and the constant dread of death. Keith Siegel reached out to the one God he’d almost forgotten, and pledged allegiance. “Shema Yisrael, Adonai Eloheinu, Adonai Echad.”

With plenty of time alone with his thoughts, Siegel reviewed his slim knowledge of Judaism. He knew the blessing for bread. It was really the only blessing he remembered. So he began saying the Hamotzi blessing at meals.  “We had a pita bread for every meal, that was the first thing I would eat after I said the bracha (blessing),” said Keith.

One day, Keith caught a glimpse of an Israeli TV show after his captors happened to switch the set on. The program was about something like good places to eat in Tel Aviv. Siegel heard one participant make the "borei minei mezonot," blessing said over baked goods and pasta before taking a bite. Keith decided that from then on, he too would make this blessing, whenever he ate anything other than pita bread.

Someone else might have thought that wrong. That you cannot say the mezonot blessing over, for example, a grape or a date. But with his mezonot, Keith Siegel was connecting to God with the only resources God gave him. “I thought it was appropriate,” he said. “But it was the only [blessing] I knew.”

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Jewish Motivation | Meaningful Minute (@meaningfulminute)

It was what Keith Siegel had. These were the tools of his survival: the shema, the hamotzi blessing, and now, the mezonot blessing. These things comforted and strengthened him. They were his pathway to God.

When Keith Siegel was finally freed after 484 days in captivity, his family recognized that something remarkable had happened, that cleaving to God was what had kept him alive. His daughter Shir spoke about it.

 “Dad searched for his Jewish identity while in captivity, and he found it in small prayers. He started saying blessings over food, like ‘Borei Minei Mezonot,’ which he had never said before, and ‘Shema Yisrael,’ which he had never recited in his life.

"He said that amidst all that hell, he wanted to remember that he was Jewish, that there was meaning to his people and to the place from which he came, and that strengthened him greatly.”

Ah, there it is right there, that backbone Jews get when between a rock and a hard place, life and death, the Inquisition and the Holocaust or a tunnel in Gaza. It only stiffens our resolve and our necks, which is why they never succeed in getting rid of us.

“After he returned,” continued Shir. “I asked him what he wanted us to do for our first Shabbat meal together. I imagined he’d want some dish he loves or a good challah. He replied, ‘You know what I want most of all? A kippah and a Kiddush cup.’”

“Who is like Your people, Israel?” (Samuel 7:23)

Keith Siegel is not the only freed hostage who turned to, instead of away from God. There are many such stories. And we will have plenty of time to tell them.

In fact it will be a delight to take our time in telling the stories, knowing that the enemy will have it rubbed in their faces for years to come. This is what happens when you try to kill the Jews.

It isn’t possible. You can’t do it. Because we’re a stiff-necked people, who, in intolerable situations will always seek to reclaim that spark in the soul that the Arab enemy so desperately wants to extinguish.

But never will.

***

We must thank two readers for bringing my attention to sources that state that it is acceptable to say the mezonot prayer on everything except water or water and salt, b'dieved (a posteriori).

A reader shares the following, "According to the Chayei Adam (58:3) and implied by the Gemara in several places (Brachos 12a, Brachos 35, somewhere in Nedarim that escapes me for the moment), 'Borei Minei Mezonos' on everything but water and salt is acceptable bdi'eved."

Yehudah Posnick comments that Rabbi Aaron Hamaoui of  of the Sephardic Community of Greater Boston said that bdi'eved, the mezonot blessing covers all foods, except for water, because the word "mezonot," suggests that the item to be ingested is satiating, and water doesn't sate. (See his comment below for the full thread.)

My take: Keith Siegel did his best and his best was the right thing to do. Disclaimer: I am not a rabbi. 

---

---

Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon! "He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024) PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

 

Read More

After October 7: Why American Jews Still Voted Democrat (Judean Rose)

Disclaimer: the views expressed here are solely those of the author, weekly Judean Rose columnist Varda Meyers Epstein.

I should be overjoyed that Donald Trump won the election. But the truth is, I’m angry. Even deep into February. Still angry.

I had thought, ‘Finally, finally, American Jews will wake up and stop voting Democrat, the party that hurts Israel.’  Instead, overwhelmingly, the Jewish vote once again went to the Democratic candidate, this time Kamala Harris. But really, it could have been any Democrat, an addlepated Biden or anyone at all.

It’s not like the Jewish vote made a difference to the outcome, a landslide for Trump by all accounts. But to me, the American Jewish vote felt like a betrayal of our people. Many Jewish lives had been lost as a result of the policies and dirty machinations of the Biden Harris administration. Had she won, Harris would have been far more hostile to Israel, and infinitely more dangerous to the Israeli people.

It was aggravating. Couldn’t they see it? The Biden Harris administration did not get our hostages home. They gave money to Hamas. They gave money to Iran. They slow-walked arms to Israel and even forced Israel to give aid to the people who murdered and raped them.

The Biden Harris administration did all manner of terrible things to Israel. As such, I expected my people to stand up for me. Heck. I expected them to stand up for themselves. Forget about the cost of bacon or tampons in boys’ bathrooms. What about their Jewish grandchildren’s ability to safely step onto a college campus?

Instead they posted memes about Kfir Bibas, but voted for Harris. Maybe they thought that sharing those memes meant they could vote however they liked and it wouldn't matter. Because posting memes of Kfir made them good Jews no matter what else they did. Except that Biden and Harris did exactly nothing for the Bibas family. They didn't fight for them. They didn't make the effort to ascertain their wellbeing. They didn't speak about the Bibas family often and at length or make them a household name. 

Doug displays a stunning breadth of knowledge on the Jewish holiday known as Hanukkah

We may not yet know when or how or even if it happened, but Shiri, Ariel, and little Kfir, as of this writing, are believed to be coming home to Israel in body bags tomorrow. Could we reasonably expect that Biden and Harris could have done something different that would have changed the outcome? Like not send money to Iran and Hamas to begin with? Of course! But their constituents didn't think about or do anything about that. They didn't pressure the administration. Instead, they just shared lots and lots of memes of little red-headed Kfir, then went out and voted for Harris.

I think of all the anxious calls I received from Jewish family and friends in the wake of October 7, and how much effort I expended in order to update and reassure them. How could they have voted this way? Did they really care anything at all about my kids in uniform? 

It’s impossible. If they cared about me and my family or their people at all, it seemed to me they would have voted for Trump. But they cared more about voting for a Democrat than doing what their family and friends in Israel prayed they would do, speak up for Israel and for their people with their vote.

It must be said that not all American Jews voted Democrat. The orthodox didn’t. But they’re a tiny minority within a minority. By and large, the Jewish vote went to the party that shed Jewish blood. 

From The Jewish Vote in 2024 (emphasis added):

 . . . At bottom, the story of the Jewish vote is really a tale of two communities—the ultra-Orthodox, who vote like Evangelicals and are about 10 percent of the total Jewish population, and secular Jews, who constitute 85 percent of the total and who vote more solidly for Democrats than any demographic besides blacks, with whom they are now virtually tied. . .

. . . More than 85 percent of American Jews (who are neither ultra-Orthodox nor Modern Orthodox) are solidly in the liberal camp and show little sign of abandoning the Democratic Party. In fact, the National Election Pool’s exit poll promoted by CNN (the one that showed that 79 percent of Jews voted for Harris) probably underrepresents the percentage of secular Jews who voted for her, since that poll included votes in Florida, where a sizable number of Modern Orthodox Jews reside. A poll by the Jewish Electorate Institute showed that Reform-affiliated Jews voted for Harris at a rate of 84 percent, with Conservative-affiliated Jews only slightly behind, at 75 percent. The same poll found that 74 percent of Orthodox Jews (Haredi and Modern Orthodox) voted for Trump.

Even when you add the pro-Trump observant Jews into the mix, American Jews still voted for Harris in greater percentages than any other major religious group in America. Catholics voted 41 percent for Harris; Protestants gave her 37 percent; Mormons came in at 25 percent, and Muslims only at 20. The only “religious” group that surpassed Jews in their support for Harris were described in the Washington Post poll as “voters with no religion” who voted for Harris over Trump 72 to 25 percent—a ratio that actually puts them behind Reform and Conservative Jews in their ardor for Harris.

For the most part, American Israelis voted much like the orthodox Jews of America. We voted for Trump, because Trump is good for Israel. It really is that simple. Why this simple fact didn’t matter to our American co-religionists—or at least didn’t take precedence over more domestic issues—was and remains unfathomable to me.

Because we had a frickin’ massacre here. I mean, wake the hell up! Is it only me who is walking around with steam coming out my ears over the Jewish vote?

Doug and Kamala doing Jewy-stuff in Jerusalem

“Hi - American Israeli here,” wrote Stuart Schnee. I had wanted to speak to American Israelis about the US election, and the self-described book “shepherd” and book publicist was happy to oblige me.

I explained to Schnee that I was writing about our feelings as American Israelis—how we felt about relatives and friends who did not vote with Israel in mind in the recent presidential election.

“Ah. I am not the right guy,” wrote Schnee. “My family voted with Israel in mind.”

I blinked. What a lovely, unexpected answer. I felt happy for a brief moment. But I wanted to know how he felt.

“How did that make you feel?” I asked.

“I can say that I am proud and appreciate it,” wrote Schnee. “They are all loyal Americans, and at the same time Israel was part of the consideration for much of my family (and they didn't all vote the same!!)”

“Interesting,” I commented.

It was like a light had come on. I saw what he meant. In their own way, even if they didn’t agree with us, Stuart Schnee’s relatives had indeed voted with Israel in mind. They cared about Israel.

Okay, but what about in the run up to the election. Did he do anything in an attempt to give them an insider’s perspective? “Did you leave them alone, or try to persuade those who didn't see it your way? Or. . . I guess you don't get all hot-headed about this stuff?”

“I used to,” wrote Schnee, “but over the years I have seen that in the US one has very little influence.”

“Are you pleased with the way American Jewry votes?” I asked. “Do you think they are well informed?”

Schnee was matter of fact. “I fully understand why Jews still vote Dem even when it seems like it isn't such a great match any more. Even Jews I know who have started voting GOP - they don't always agree with every policy the GOP champions.”

She knows a thing or two about yarmulkes.

I posed the same question to Batya Spiegelman Medad, an expat American living in Shilo, a woman who has no problem stating her mind. “Do you have relatives who expressed concern for you after October 7, then proceeded to vote for a candidate you felt was bad for Israel?”

“Yes, for sure. The vast majority of my relatives vote religiously for Democrats, and a few have shown concern—in one case very strong, sincere concern and support—for Israel, but they don't recognize that the party they support endangers the survival of the State of Israel. I never initiate political discussions with them, nor with American friends. I write very clearly what I think on Facebook and my blog Shiloh Musings. I try not to argue with anyone or respond to the negative things they write, but I won't mute my opinions,” said Medad.

“Does it make you angry to know they voted for someone who you feel poses a danger to Israel? Or rather, how does it make you feel? I don't want to presume you're angry,” I said.

“Angry? I'm beyond anger; it saddens me,” said Medad. “I'm so different from my family. Actually, I'm the ‘rebel.’ I took the 1960s in a different direction, becoming a Torah observant Jew, demonstrating for Soviet Jewry as my version of civil rights and then making aliyah with my husband two months after our wedding.

“When one tried to discuss American elections, I said that for me the important issues for choosing which party to vote for in the presidency depends on two things only, defense/security and economics. They don't get it.”

“But you kept it to yourself. You said nothing to them. It's just politics, and politics shouldn't come between relatives?” I asked. “Or you just didn't see the point? Something else? Does it feel like you're carrying it around? Does it make you uncomfortable to correspond/speak with them?”

“There's no doubt that many of my family have seen/read my opinions,” said Medad, “but I'm not going to argue directly with them. Without facebook, I'd lose all contact with most of my family, and I don't want that. If anyone asks a question, I answer.

Medad continued, “The problem is that most Americans have chosen to listen/read only one type of news media. They don't think/compare to make their own decisions. They repeat the lies they've heard and aren't open to hearing something else.

“It must be so confusing for most American Jews to have heard what happened to innocent Israelis on Oct 7, 2023, and then be told that Israel is guilty,” added Medad. “But there are left-wing Israelis, even bereaved families from the southern kibbutzim, who can't accept that their political opinions about peace with their Arab neighbors is a dangerous lie. They're sticking together to make sure nobody shakes their ‘conceptzia.’”

Chanuka joy

I went next to Susan Tova Mann Hirsch, a retired teacher (44 years) of children with special needs and asked her to weigh in. “Did you have relatives who expressed concern for you in regard to Oct. 7, but then voted in a way you felt was contrary to Israel's interests? Do you feel American Jewry is well informed about Israel and geopolitics?”

“My one sister expressed a lot of concern about my living here in Israel after Oct. 7; however, she still voted for Harris,” said Hirsch. “I still have lots of friends and family in America and I feel they are poorly informed (and educated) about Israel and the geopolitical situation in our part of the world. Most see no problem with granting the so-called Palestinians with a state of their own. They really don’t understand what is going on here and the issues/problems faced by Israel.”

“How does that make you feel?” I asked.

“That if my family members really cared about my safety (and the safety of all Israelis),” continued Hirsch, “they would do more to support Israel. They really didn’t/don’t understand how much more dangerous it would have been for Israel if Harris and her crew would have been elected.”

“Well, but can you tell me what emotion it makes you feel, for example, understanding, betrayed, patient, despairing, resigned, angry, sad?” I pressed.

“A tad angry, but more resigned that they truly don’t understand and/comprehend what really is happening here.”

Bear hug from Bibi! 

Last but not least, I spoke with Israel Pickholtz, a genealogist friend. Knowing he shares my sentiments on the subject, I got right down to it. “How do you feel about the fact that even after Oct. 7, American Jewry still largely voted for Harris?” I asked

“There is definitely a disconnect between caring about Israel and actually voting that way,” said Pickholtz.

“What do you think causes that disconnect, and is there anything regular people can do to help them reconnect?” I asked.

“Let's give them the benefit of the doubt,” he said. “They must have great faith to believe that we will survive despite the US government.

He quoted Esther 4:14: "רֶוַח וְהַצָּלָה יַעֲמוֹד לַיְּהוּדִים מִמָּקוֹם אַחֵר" “Relief and salvation will come to the Jewish people from another place . . .”

I finished the verse in my head, “. . . and you and your father’s house will be lost.”

“We will survive,” said Pickholtz. “They?”

“Is there anything we can or should do to address this?” I asked.

“Keep reminding them that they are on the wrong side of Jewish history.”

Oh, I will. But I guess I’ll have to start reminding them in a quieter voice. The angry tone of my written social media screeds doesn't seem to be having the desired effect. If my words have had any impact at all it was to to alienate my faraway loved ones. They think I don’t understand them and what is important to them. They’re right. I don’t understand why their people don’t come before all other considerations. That is the wide chasm that divides us, a divide that may prove too wide to bridge.

---

---

Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon! "He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024) PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

 

Read More

Conniving Jewish Dogs: The Canine Casualties of October 7 (Judean Rose)

Arbel Yehoud with her partner Ariel Cunio, still captive in Gaza, and their rescue puppy, Murph

Disclaimer: the views expressed here are solely those of the author, weekly Judean Rose columnist Varda Meyers Epstein.

When Eli Sharabi appeared on our screens wasted, skeletal, like an apparition from the Holocaust, it broke our hearts. We knew he’d been through a Holocaust without having heard the details. And like so many other survivors of the previous Holocaust, Eli was to learn what he’d hoped against hope was not true: no one in his immediate family was waiting for him. Eli Sharabi’s wife was gone. His two daughters were gone. His home was gone. Even his dog was gone—on October 7, Hamas shot Eli Sharabi’s four-legged friend dead, too.

Before the release of Eli Sharabi, there was Arbel Yehoud, squeezed on every side by masked Hamas terrorists armed to the teeth. She was terrified. No one had explained what was happening to her now, and she was sure that this time she would not manage to cheat death as she had for over a year. But Arbel did survive and she did get out.

Arbel’s partner, of course, is still suffering, still locked away in Gaza—we hope—because the alternative is death. But Arbel’s dog Murph is not suffering, and not locked away for some indeterminate period of unending time. Murph was shot dead by Hamas terrorists on October 7. 

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by My Land of Israel / Meira׳s Page (@mylandmyhomeisrael)

Emily Damari impressed us all with her spunky personality still shining through after going through hell. With good humor, Emily gave us the victory sign despite her missing fingers. Hamas had shot her in the hand. They sewed it up crudely, without anesthesia, in unhygienic conditions, but Emily survived.

Emily Damari’s dog Choocha did not. Like so many other faithful family dogs on that black day in October, Emily’s dog had been shot dead.

What are we supposed to make of terrorists whose hate for Jews runs so deep and so black that even their pets must be eliminated? Do Nukhba “fighters” and the “just regular Gazan folk” who poured across the border to slaughter Jews, see these dogs as having a taint by association with their Jewish masters, or did the terrorists simply murder them for sport?

Here we see a dog come bounding out of a house towards the October 7 attackers, hoping to protect his owners, only to be immediately mowed down with a barrage of bullets

                                     

He staggers along through several shots

Did they murder the dogs to shut them up so they wouldn’t alert their owners to the horror that was about to descend upon them? Or did the murderers perhaps murder these beloved family pets to inflict maximum pain on their Jewish owners? Who knows?

At last he succumbs, after a final bullet takes his life.

Perhaps the murderers murdered these voiceless, intelligent creatures because in their brand of Islam, dogs are impure and spread impurity and may therefore be mistreated and killed at will. Especially, if you happen to be a monster that craves blood. Maybe it doesn’t matter whose blood is shed, blood is blood, and all of it makes terrorists happy. They see red and it gives them joy. And it didn’t begin on October 7.

In November 2022, Tayseer Abu Sneineh, the mayor of Hebron and a convicted murderer of six Israelis, announced a 20 shekel bounty—about $5—to anyone who captured or killed a stray dog. The Arab residents of that town proceeded to go on a wild shooting spree, torturing and killing dozens of dogs. Judging by the subsequent flood of footage and photos on social media, the Hebron dog massacre was probably less about the money than the easy attainment of a license to kill. This appalling episode suggests that PA and Hamas-ruled Arabs do indeed enjoy spilling the blood of living things, in particular, Jews and dogs. 

It’s reasonable to wonder what Islam has to say about killing dogs, creatures unable to defend themselves from a maniac with a gun. Well, it’s not that the Quran says it straight out: “Kill dogs.” But it comes pretty close. According to one Hadith, for every day that a Muslim keeps a dog as a pet, he loses a part of his heavenly reward:

[Ibn ‘Umar] said:

“I heard [Mohammed] say: ‘Whoever keeps a dog, except a dog that is trained for hunting or a dog for herding livestock, his reward will decrease each day by two Qirats.’”

. . . What is the meaning of Qirats? When the companions asked [Mohammed] about its meaning he said: “Equal to two huge mountains.”

Raising a dog or keeping a dog decreases our good deeds.

When keeping a dog for any of the reasons known in shariah then you should prepare a separate place for it [as] dogs shouldn’t enter the house.

Muslims are permitted to keep dogs for practical reasons like hunting, herding, and serving as watchdogs. Unfortunately, abuse of these smart, sensitive animals is widespread. “I volunteer at the Gush Etzion Municipal Pound,” relates Efrat resident Leora Hyman. “We get dogs from the surrounding area. We have had dogs and puppies come in with no ears. Their ears are hacked off. I have heard that it's done so when the dogs are guarding outside in the rain, the rain and the wind will get into their ears and bother them so much, so they won't fall asleep. One puppy came in with no ears, cigarette burns and a knife wound.

“I adopted one of those puppies and he could never get over his trauma of being in a small place,” said Hyman. “If he were in a small space he would become aggressive. If he saw Arab workers, he would bark at them even though he was friendly to everyone else. Always.

“Other puppies have come in and not been so traumatized, but their ears are gone and they struggle in the rain and wind. I bought my dog an ear covering for walks in the rain.”

It’s painful to hear about and witness such cruelty, but even more difficult to understand why the world would cheer on a motley crew of dog killers. Sure, we understand that the world hates Jews. But dogs??

You’d think that all the students and others protesting Israel’s “genocide” of “innocent” Gazans, in addition to supposedly caring about the Gazan people, would also care about animal rights. What would these green-smoothie-drinking college campus protesters say were we to show them the clips and photos of Hamas terrorists shooting defenseless creatures dead on October 7? There’s no lack of such photographic evidence. The terrorists filmed the whole thing themselves with their GoPro cameras.

Would the protesters make excuses of some sort for this show of barbarism—the cold-hearted murder of harmless pets? Surely pets have no religion and no political bent for which they might reasonably be slaughtered. Or is killing a dog somehow different when it happens while ridding the world of colonialist Apartheid Jew occupiers? 

Can excuses be made in such a case? Or even denials? Can one reasonably claim that the GoPro footage was edited?

There was no outrage at the gang-raping and genital mutilation of Jewish women on October 7. There was no outcry as Jewish women in captivity continued to be sexually abused by their captors. But there was also no outcry and no outrage at the murdering of several of man’s best friends.

Could it be that when a man is Jewish, man’s best friend is nothing but a conniving Jew?

---

---

Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon! "He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024) PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

 

Read More

Terror Unleashed: The Dangerous Cost of Hostage Freedom (Judean Rose)

Disclaimer: the views expressed here are solely those of the author, weekly Judean Rose columnist Varda Meyers Epstein.

The night before the first three women hostages were released, Prime Minister Netanyahu addressed the nation. Attempting to placate a nation appalled at the prospect of another terrorist release, the prime minister made a promise [emphasis added]. “We have established that terrorists who have killed will not be released to Judea and Samaria; they will be expelled to the Gaza Strip or abroad, and we also decided in the cabinet on a very significant reinforcement of our forces in Judea and Samaria to protect our citizens,” said Bibi.

Because we have been lied to before, we didn’t really believe this declaration. But it didn’t much matter. The only difference between a terrorist who has killed and one who hasn’t, is that in the first instance, the victims died, and in the second, they lived. That is why the distinction isn’t much comfort to the 5,700 or so Jewish residents of Beit El. Of the first 200 terrorists released in this deal, 114 of them were sent to Ramallah, adjacent to Beit El.

One woman in my town of Efrat heard that a further 22 terrorists “who have not killed” were released to Hebron, quite close to us. I asked how she knows this, since everything about the mass terrorist release has been cloaked in mystery. It turns out her son’s friend is serving there. He said he would have been safer in Gaza.  

In truth, there is a general air of despondency here. Many assume that what we hear about the terrorist release is not true, or at least not the whole truth, because so little information filters down to the common man that it makes us suspicious. Others are more pragmatic. “I'm not sure it's a ‘lie’ as much as politics and hands tied and deals behind the scenes,” says Chani Ugowitz of Efrat.

Be that as it may, the lack of information has created an air of distrust. Victim families directly affected by the release have yet to be contacted by the government. Those of us who live in close proximity to locations where terrorists will now roam free, have not been briefed.

 “This is a crazy complicated situation. I am so against this "deal"/ blackmail but know so many people that are going with it because they feel we had no choice. We tried the other way and it didn't work. I don't know. Makes me mad, scared, and sad,” says Ugowitz.

“It’s incredibly painful,” said another Efrat friend, Rachel Schwartz, “Statistically, half of those will do another terror attack. 170 out of 200 hundred that were released had life sentences. Varda, it is so incredibly painful. I can’t stand it.”

I had heard the same figure regarding terrorist recidivism. But it seems this figure has been updated. Lt. Col. (res.) Attorney Morris Hirsch formerly of the Military Prosecutor’s Office, writes that [emphasis added], “[As] part of the cabinet discussion going into approving the deal, the head of the Shin Bet noted that 82% of those released in the Shalit deal returned to terrorism.”

In the frightening Hebrew-language article, Without you knowing: This is how Israeli terrorists will be released back to the country, Hirsch shares a further, little known but profoundly disturbing fact, “The list of terrorists who will be released as part of the deal includes no less than 73 terrorists who hold Israeli citizenship or residency. This means they will be released back to the country.”

“Of that list, 21 terrorists are serving life sentences – that is, murderers. Of these, eight terrorists are to be released to Israel (within the 1949 armistice lines), while the rest are to be deported, although at this stage it is not clear where,” writes Hirsch. “Five of the eight are affiliated with Hamas and the rest with Fatah. All eight were arrested between 2001 and 2003, during the terror attacks initiated by the PA, starting in September 2000.”

All in all, of the 73 Israeli terrorists to be released from prison, 45 will be released into Israel, writes Hirsch, “while the remaining 28 terrorists will be deported abroad, either temporarily (3 terrorists) or permanently (25 terrorists).”

We may not know nearly enough about the terms of this deal but one thing seems certain, exactly none of the terrorists slated for release will be deported to America. President Trump wants Americans to feel safe. He doesn’t want any more innocents killed, people like Jocelyn Nungary and Riley Laken. So Mr. Trump is having these criminal elements deported. He doesn’t want them in his country.

“And there they are deporting murderers and criminals,” said Chani Ugowitz of the new administration, “while forcing us to take them to our streets with our children.

“I've gotten very harsh in my views since the war and I don't like it but I don't like how the other side has pushed me to think in an "us or them" mentality. There is no partner on the other side of the negotiation table so it becomes blackmail on their end and force on ours.”

Then too, what does it say about Israel that we’re freeing murderers into the wind? Whatever it was that was held over Bibi’s head to agree to this deal, it’s hard to hear that it was worth letting these murderers roam loose. Why would anyone even ask us to do so? 

“How depressing that monsters like these are the price of getting innocent Israelis freed from the Hamas underworld,” remarked Arnold Roth, father of 15-year-old terror victim Malki Roth, murdered in a pizzeria. “and that there's no one so monstrous that Israel would keep him or her in prison if the blackmail demands were perceived as warranting an even more painful surrender.”

Meantime, outside of Israel, Jews are giving Trump's Middle East Envoy Steve Witkoff multiple ovations (!) for forcing Israel into accepting Biden’s May horrific deal. Yet he managed to get not a single American hostage released. 

What then, was the point?

I wonder if President Trump is aware that among the terrorists released or slated for release in this deal, are many who were convicted of murdering Americans. JD Vance begged us Israeli Americans to vote for Trump, and we did. Now we wonder at the betrayal of American Israeli victims of terror whose murderers we were leaned on to release.

Why was Israel pressed into this deal now, when we were ahead of the game, when we were winning, when we were no longer between a rock and a hard place because it was no longer Joe Biden threatening us, slow-walking arms, and supplying the enemy with cash dollars? Trump had won and could now push Hamas into releasing the captives with just a few threatening words. Why then force Israel to release murderers from Israeli jails into the wild? 

Will we ever know why we were compelled by Trump to sign a bad deal months after it had been rejected? Or why not one American hostage has yet been released since this ceasefire was implemented. As of this writing, Keith Siegel is not to be released in this latest batch of hostages, and we know he is fast fading. Emily Damari was so worried about Siegel that she offered to switch places and let him go first. Hamas refused.

Keith Siegel, an dual American citizen held captive in Gaza

So we watch as no Americans are released, but the murderers of Americans like Dr. David Applebaum and his daughter Nava, who were blown up in the Hillel Café on the night before what would have been Nava’s wedding are going free in this “deal.” 

Dr. David Applebaum, Nava Applebaum, murdered at the Hillel Cafe in Jerusalem

Member of the cell that killed them, released or about to be.

The same is true of the murderer of American citizen Asher Palmer and his baby son Yonatan, who were on their way to spend Shabbat with their family when their murderer stoned their car with boulders.

Asher and Yonatan Palmer, murdered when their car was stoned while driving to family for Shabbat

 

On the list of terrorists demanded by Hamas

Ditto the murderer of Tuvia Yanai Weissman, an American killed by a child terrorist in 2016 while shopping at a supermarket.

Out or about to be out and free as birds.

It was that last name that grabbed at my throat, as I finished scanning a new list of the terrorists to be released, this time in English, from Palestinian Media Watch (PMW). It was just before Shabbat, and I had to shut down my computer, but I remembered that one. I never could get Tuvia Yanai Weissman out of my mind, because of the photo that circulated of him with his young wife and infant son. He had such a beautiful baby face, and his wife’s face was so full of joy and light. How awful to lose her young husband with whom she was clearly smitten. I mentioned Tuvia at the Shabbat table, and my youngest son told me that Weissman’s wife is his friend’s sister.

Tuvia Yanai Weissman, a dual American citizen, murdered in a supermarket.

Every Israeli has multiple connections to multiple terror victims. Connections upon connections upon connections. That’s the way it is.

Ari Fuld, dual American citizen, murdered while talking to his wife on the phone

I wonder: does President Trump feel a connection to the American victims whose murderers are now being set free in this deal we were compelled by his man Witkoff, to sign?

Why don’t we hear President Trump threatening Hamas if they don’t release Keith Siegel, now? 

Why don’t we hear Witkoff saying to Hamas, “No. You can’t have the terrorists who killed American citizens. You can’t have the murderers of Americans Marla Bennett and Ben Blustein, exchange students killed in the Hebrew University Cafeteria,” or “No. You can’t have the terrorist who killed American citizen Ari Fuld while he was standing outside a supermarket talking on the phone with his wife,” or “No. You can’t have the murderers of David and Nava Applebaum, or the murderers of Asher and Yonatan Palmer. You can’t have the murderers of Tuvia Yanai Weissman.”

Ben Blustein, American exchange student

Marla Bennett, American exchange student, who along with Ben was murdered in the Frank Sinatra cafeteria on the Hebrew University Mt. Scopus campus

Instead, we hear none of this. We hear people say things like, “What if it were your family members being held in Gaza?” as if those of us who feel as I do, that this “deal” is a horrible, unjust, and dangerous thing, are heartless.

But two things can be true at once. We are joyous at the release of each hostage, and sick at the release of murderers of loved ones we tracked down, caught, and jailed. Where is the justice for the victims? 

How do you think their families feel?

And how would you feel if you lived in Beit El, and 114 murderers had just been released next door to your home?

---

---

Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon! "He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024) PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

 

Read More