Showing posts with label Jews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jews. Show all posts
Thursday, May 04, 2023
- Thursday, May 04, 2023
- Elder of Ziyon
- 1948, British Mandate, building a state, Haganah, Haifa, Jaffa, Jews, Palestine Post
The time between May 1 and May 15, 1948, was a strange time in British Mandate Palestine.
Someone has to keep the lights on, collect the garbage, deliver the mail, approve permits. It takes mature people to step in and do the work needed for the good of all.
Many British bureaucrats had already packed up and left ahead of their official departure on May 15. But the Jewish state couldn't be declared yet.
Normal governmental functions still needed to be done. And who did them?
The Jews, of course.
Palestine Post, May 3, 1948:
May 4:
This is leadership.
The wealthy Arabs ran away in December, but their political leaders in Jaffa and Haifa were the first to leave, not the last, when those cities were taken over by the Haganah. (May 4)
And what about in the Arab sector? They were busy doing a run on their banks (May 2):
Monday, May 01, 2023
On January 16, 1920, prominent leaders of Nablus - both Muslim and Christian - met in a conference where they pledged, under oath::
(1) To boycott the Jews completely as n counter-measure against their covetous spirit toward this country.(2) To refuse them dwelling space in our district, and to binder their admittance thereto in every way.(3) To persevere In this boycott and opposition until there remains no trace of the Zionist Idea, or until we perish to the last man.(4) To submit this decision to His Excellency the Chief Administrator of the Occupied Territory, and, through the medium of the Allied representatives In Jerusalem, to the delegates of their respective governments at the Peace Conference; and to publish the same in the newspapers for the information of the civilized world, so that It may be understood why the inhabitants of this country are forced to sacrifice their lives for its freedom.(Seat of the Islamo-Christian Conference at Nablus.] (Signed) Youssuf.
It was essentially a declaration of unending war against the Jews of Palestine until they returned to being the second class citizens they should be.
This wasn't the only boycott that Palestinian Arabs declared against Jews.
The fifth "Palestine Arab Congress" in 1922 pledged a boycott of Jewish products and services including the nascent electricity lines being set up by Pinchas Rutenberg, and this was reiterated in at least one successive Congress.
There is not exactly room for compromise here. The Arab leaders said, either Jews remain subjugated under our control, or we keep fighting them forever.
Terrorism and Arab Jew-hatred is not a reaction to Jewish "occupation" or supposed crimes. It pre-dates all of that. And whether it is official or not, the pledge to keep opposing Jewish rights in the Holy Land has never been rescinded.
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon! Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. Read all about it here! |
|
Thursday, November 24, 2022
- Thursday, November 24, 2022
- Elder of Ziyon
- 1862, 1939, antisemitism, Jews, USA
New York Times, 1862:
New York Daily Herald, 1878:
Birmingham Daily Mail, 1880:
Sydney Morning Herald, 1883:
Glasgow Herald, 1884:
St. Louis Post Dispatch, 1888:
Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 1895:
Philadelphia Inquirer, 1906:
Boston Globe, 1910:
Hartford Courant, 1923:
Asbury Park Press, 1931, in what may be the most fascinating of them all:
Kansas City Times, 1939, the latest one I could find.
The phrase "Jews need not apply" was so well known that it was the punchline to jokes, as this article in British newspapers in 1889 shows.
No major city's newspapers were immune from publishing the phrase.
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon! Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. Read all about it here! |
|
Friday, November 18, 2022
- Friday, November 18, 2022
- Elder of Ziyon
- Al-Aqsa Mosque, Freedom of Religion, Friday prayers, Islam, Israel, Jews, Muslims, Temple Mount
Today, according to Arab websites, 60,000 Muslims visited the Al Aqsa Mosque complex on the Temple Mount.
If you walk there on a weekday, it is far less crowded, but there are always hundreds of Muslims that can be seen there.
Here's what it looked like on Thursday, August 11, 1960, under Jordanian rule.
The visitor, a Christian, noted a few people inside the Al Aqsa mosque, saying that more would show up at prayer times. He was told that the mosque could hold as many as 5,000 people.
Even if we assume on holidays that 5,000 people showed up - okay, double it and make it 10,000 - there is no way that there were ever 60,000 people on the Temple Mount at any time under Muslim rule. If there were so many visitors, there wouldn't be weeds between the pavement stones.
During Ramadan, Muslim authorities sometimes claim as many as half a million Muslims on the site, although I don't think it can fit more than 150,000. Either way, it is indisputable that far more Muslims have visited Al Aqsa under Jewish rule than ever did under Jordanian, Ottoman or any other Muslim (or British) rule. (The entire Muslim population of Jerusalem was 54,000 in 1967.)
If the Jews are oppressing Muslims so much, then please explain why far, far more Muslims visit the Temple Mount on an average Friday under Jewish rule than ever visited before 1967?
Tuesday, November 15, 2022
- Tuesday, November 15, 2022
- Elder of Ziyon
- 2020, antisemitism, Arab antisemitism, Arab News, crypto-Jews, Hezbollah, Jews, Lebanon, Muslim antisemitism
The former Jewish quarter in Tripoli |
In 2014, when the Magen Abraham Synagogue reopened in Beirut, Lebanese politicians from across the spectrum were present, bathed in the glare of TV cameras. They all reiterated their support for a community they said they cherished as much as the other 17 sects that make up the Lebanese government.Former prime minister Fouad Siniora declared: “We respect Judaism. Our only problem is with Israel.”Even Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah weighed in: “This is a religious place of worship and its restoration is welcome.”
Hussain Rahal, a spokesman for Hezbollah, likewise said: "We respect the Jewish religion just like we do Christianity. The Jews have always lived among us. We have an issue with Israel's occupation of land."
This is a standard lie we hear throughout the Arab world, and nowhere is it as obviously false as in Lebanon.
Because there are still a handful of Jews in Lebanon - modern day crypto-Jews, frightened to be revealed to their neighbors.
Monte Carlo Doualiya reports that there are only 27 Lebanese Jews left. They live in great fear and hide their true religious identity. In Tripoli in northern Lebanon, the remaining members of the Jewish community are not known to their neighbors and practice Judaism in complete secrecy.
The Magen Abraham synagogue is not used as a house of worship. The Jews are too frightened to go there publicly.
If the Lebanese have no problem with Jews, then why do the remaining Jews have to hide?
The Arab News article, which is pretty good, describes the fear in starker terms:
The story has it that a Jewish woman from Beirut who was keen to meet other Jews heard of a coreligionist living in the town of Zahle, 50km east of the capital. She went there and searched for her. It was difficult as the woman had changed her name, something many Jews have done for safety reasons. But when she finally found her, the Zahle woman met her with a glacial stare. She spoke one word: Leave. The woman was obviously scared of the attention her visitor might awaken.Those who are still there preserve a total silence about their identity. They gather secretly in each other’s houses for their prayers.
The Arab News feature notes that Lebanese Jews who now live in New York are nostalgic for the good times in the past, but in Lebanon they were attacked every time something happened in Israel.
True, Lebanese Jews were not rounded up and thrown out like their Egyptian, Iraqi and Syrian counterparts, yet “whenever something happened in Palestine, people would take revenge on the Jews,” said (author of a book on the Jews of Lebanon) Zeidan.“They would throw a bomb at a synagogue or kidnap a Jewish man. Protests would erupt, inciting violence against the Jews.”
It seems almost unbelievable that there are crypto-Jews today, hiding their Jewish identity the way that their ancestors did in Spain and Portugal out of fear for their lives. But they still exist, and they are living proof that "anti-Zionism" always was, and always will be, antisemitism.
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon! Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. Read all about it here! |
|
Tuesday, September 20, 2022
- Tuesday, September 20, 2022
- Elder of Ziyon
- 1943, American Jewish Congress, history, Holocaust, Jewish refugees, Jews, NGO silence, silence is complicity, USA, World Jewish Congress, wrong side of history
They presented a letter to Vice President Wallace asking for a government agency to help save the remaining Jews from the Holocaust. The letter demanded that the US open its doors to Jewish refugees, that the UN create a passport that could be used for Jews to travel, and for Britain to "open the doors of Palestine."
Some of the details about this trip are outrageous.
Historian Alex Grobman writes:
Dressed in long, dark rabbinic attire, the rabbis walked from Union Station to the Capitol Building. There, Rabbis Eliezer Silver, Israel Rosenberg and Bernhard Louis Levinthal led a recitation of Psalms. Peter Bergson (Hillel Kook), who was head of the Emergency Committee to Save the Jewish People of Europe, introduced them to Vice President Henry Wallace and a number of Congressmen.Bergson enlisted the rabbis and the American Jewish Legion of Veterans for the march. He expected American clergy would join, but none did. Only the Union of Orthodox Rabbis of the U.S. and Canada, the Union of Hassidic Rabbis and a commander of the Jewish Legion participated. The modern Orthodox Rabbinical Council of America sent Rabbi David Silver, Rabbi Eliezer Silver’s son.White House adviser Judge Samuel Rosenman told the president that those “behind this petition” were “not representative of the most thoughtful elements in Jewry.” The “leading Jews” Rosenman knew opposed the march, but he admitted failing to “keep the horde from storming Washington.”A number of Jewish congressmen had attempted to dissuade the rabbis from marching. This backfired when Congressman Sol Bloom, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, argued that “It would be undignified for these un-American looking rabbis to appear in the nation’s capital.”At the Lincoln Memorial, the rabbis—who had declared a fast day—prayed for the welfare of the armed forces and the Jews of Europe and a quick Allied victory. Then they walked to the White House and prayed outside the gates. Though they expected to meet with the President, they were told he was unavailable. Later they learned he went to Bolling Field Air Force Base for a minor ceremony to avoid meeting them.
Rafael Medoff adds:
The era’s most prominent American Jewish leader, Rabbi Stephen Wise, criticized the march in somewhat similar terms. Wise, who headed the American Jewish Congress, the World Jewish Congress, and the American Zionist movement, wrote that “the orthodox rabbinical parade [ sic]” was a “painful and even lamentable exhibition.” He derided the organizers as “stuntists” and accused them of offending “the dignity of [the Jewish] people.”
The oh-so-dignified Jews were aghast that Orthodox rabbis would make a scene while pleading for the lives of Jews in Europe.
And these self-appointed leaders were dead wrong. They thought that since they had their own access to corridors of power, they had influence in those corridors. In fact, Roosevelt didn't want to meet the rabbis specifically because he didn't want to be pressured to help save the Jewish refugees from Europe. FDR knew the power of public pressure. (His schedule that afternoon was remarkably open.)
The vice president issued a vague, meaningless statement of support meant to get rid of these strange Jews.
And there was a more than a little self-hating from the American secular Jews in this event, as these supposed defenders of Jews in America did not want to be associated with people who looked like their grandfathers did. The Orthodox embarrassed them. Public tears to help save millions of lives is not the image they want Americans to see.
They thought of themselves as superior, at having left their visible Judaism behind. And their conceit that they are better, and know better, than other Jews, indirectly resulted in more European Jews being murdered.
It is the same conceit that kept the daily attacks on Orthodox Jews in Brooklyn out of the news cycle for so long.
Friday, September 16, 2022
- Friday, September 16, 2022
- Elder of Ziyon
- 2022, Institute for Social Policy and Understanding, Islamophobia, Jews, Muslims, opinion poll, poll
The Institute for Social Policy and Understanding has released its 2022 survey on Muslims in America.
The findings on the specific questions that make up the definition of Islamophobia are even more interesting.
The survey shows that Jews are the one faith group that is most tolerant towards Muslims.
Even more than Muslims themselves!
The Discrimination and Islamophobia section of the survey shows that in their Islamophobia Index, which averages to responses for several questions about Muslims, Jews were by far the most tolerant - and Muslims looked at themselves in a worse light than the average American does.
17% of Jews were considered Islamophobic according to this index, while 25% of the general public did - and 26% of Muslims themselves.
While only 9% of Jews say Muslims are prone to violence, 24% of Muslims say that - the highest faith group to believe that by far and nearly triple that of the general public.
For the question of "Do you agree that most Muslims living in the United States are hostile to the United States," again the highest score went to Muslims themselves - 19% - compared to only 4% for Jews.
Nearly identical results came from the question of whether respondents agree that US Muslims are less civilized than other Americans.
Another result of the survey is that white Muslims are far more Islamophobic than Muslims of color - and it is getting worse.
ISPU tries to spin these results, saying that the Muslims who are self-hating have been brainwashed by mainstream Islamophobic tropes.
Endorsing negative stereotypes about one’s own community is referred to as internalized oppression, or internalized bigotry or racism in the case of a racial group. ... Some studies on internalized racism have surprisingly found that endorsing negative stereotypes about one’s own group is associated with a higher locus of control. This suggests that internalized prejudice may actually be a defense mechanism against the trauma of bigotry at the hands of the dominant group by agreeing with those in power but believing one has the choice (locus of control) to not be like those tropes.
That would make sense if the mainstream was indeed bigoted - one could expect a small percentage of the minority group to be influenced by the majority. But as theses result show, the majority isn't Islamophobic compared to Muslims themselves, which makes that theory nonsensical.
One other point: if a Muslim organization has no problem noting that over a quarter of US Muslims are Islamophobic by their definition, why is it considered so awful for Jews to point out that some Jews are antisemitic?
(h/t Adam Albilya)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)