Incorrect categorisationThis is hardly a retraction of the disgusting views mentioned.
The original opinion piece was incorrectly categorised by a junior assistant editor and passed the usual checks due to a temporary resource shortage, as such it was inadvertently approved for news aggregators. Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience caused.
And of course, Mathaba has a huge catalog of other articles by the same author as well as different authors, which include such gems as:
Many people will laugh at the very idea that a Jew would consider any black to be an equal – as a rule, Jews loathe blacks more than they do whites, but they find that exploiting blacks is advantageous to the advancement of their agenda, and it is for this reason, and no other, that they associate with blacks.
In the end the article is nothing more than a recap, it reiterates the same tired and predicable story we see time and again in the United States, Goyim states fact, Jews react with litigation, litigation fails, Goy is smeared in the media, etc… etc… ad nauseum.
In fact the word "Jew" is found on the Mathaba search engine nearly 200 times, a strange obsession at the least.
Mathaba was delisted by Google for reasons unknown in April but it got reinstated. Their freedom of speech isn't the issue; it is that Google consistently applies different standards to far left news and opinion outlets than those of the right.