Wednesday, March 12, 2025

From Ian:

Seth Mandel: Normalize Normalization!
The run of normalization agreements were an acknowledgement that Israel and increasing parts of the Arab world share the same reality: Their maps of the world actually match now, ending a bizarre parallel existence.

The agreements also normalized the idea that normalization could be part of future Israeli-Arab agreements and maybe even the goal of negotiations. Israel has a peace treaty with Egypt and one with Jordan and now mutual recognition with several other states, suggesting that one day it might be considered abnormal to not have normalization between an Arab state and Israel. Could normalization become the new norm?

It’s a good sign that, depending on who you ask, the idea of normalization is on the table between Israel and Lebanon. There have always been factions in Lebanon who support diplomatic relations with Israel. But the rejectionists had the backing of imperial Tehran and its Syrian satrapy. So the rejectionists always won.

For a time it seemed as though the window for normalization had passed, in part because it was starting to look like Lebanon’s time as a country had passed. Its borders with Syria were blurred, its capital was controlled from Iran, and its parliament was colonized by Hezbollah.

Now that Israel has substantially weakened Hezbollah, Lebanon has a chance to make its own decisions. The election of Joseph Aoun as its new president was a further blow to Hezbollah. Israel is treading carefully, having released Lebanese prisoners as a goodwill gesture and asking nothing in return. Aoun will use that gesture to argue to the Lebanese public that it would be beneficial to the country to improve relations with Israel.

The Lebanese deny that normalization is on the table, of course. Recognition of Israel is never on the table until it is close enough to avoid being sabotaged by rejectionists.

But Lebanon can’t avoid negotiations with Israel, so the only question is what they are negotiating. Israel and Lebanon have been working on a maritime boundary and now share the daunting task of keeping Hezbollah from rebuilding its ministate in South Lebanon, for example.

Normalization isn’t yet near. But that’s the funny thing about normalization: It exists before it is formally brought into being. Talking about normalization is a kind of normalization all its own. After that, it’s only a matter of time.
NYPost Editorial: Ignore the negotiations sideshow: Hamas must leave Gaza or be destroyed
The key point of this war has always been destroying the Oct. 7 perpetrators and ensuring no such horror can ever happen again.

Yes, Hamas is enjoying a de facto cease-fire without releasing any more hostages, even though it’s shown no willingness to lay down its arms, surrender or even remove its fighters from Israel’s border.

Meanwhile, someone on Team Trump sent clueless Adam Boehler off to talk directly with Hamas.

That mission not only broke a longstanding practice of not negotiating directly with terrorists, it infuriated many Israelis by suggesting Washington was acting naively behind Jerusalem’s back, creating daylight between the two allies.

Even President Joe Biden’s Secretary of State Antony Blinken admits that when Hamas sees daylight, it only hardens its position.

Worse, Boehler actually called the Hamas negotiators “pretty nice guys”; he had to tweet to clarify, “they are BY DEFINITION BAD people.” Ouch.

Israel is stepping up pressure on Hamas by cutting off aid and electricity to Gaza, but it’ll likely take more than that to dislodge Hamas.

Fortunately, Team Trump (unlike Biden’s crew) seems to know it.

If Jerusalem believes it has something to gain by holding off military action for now, fine.

But either way, it knows what it (with US help) must ultimately do: End Hamas’ rule in Gaza once and for all.
Seth Mandel: Time To Stop Playing Games with the Houthis
The Houthis announced that they plan to resume their attacks on merchant ships traveling through the Red Sea and Suez shipping lanes. The Yemen-based, Iranian-sponsored junta makes two claims: that they will only attack Israeli vessels and that they are doing this in solidarity with Hamas in Gaza.

Both are false. In reality, every ship will be vulnerable to attack, and the Houthis are testing a model of 21st-century piracy that, if successful, will be made permanent and likely copied by others, throwing the global economy (and global security) into turmoil for which it is unprepared.

The Houthis can and should be stopped, but it would require Western leaders to confront the consequences of their atrocious miscalculation of the Houthi threat. Meanwhile, the Houthis’ fan base in Western progressive activist circles should be seen for what they are: cheerleaders for economic terrorism that, if left unchecked, will cause a chain reaction of death and destruction across the region and beyond.

In other words, it’s time to stop playing games with the Houthis.

Let’s take the first lie first: that only Israeli ships are in danger. Just one example of several, via Noam Raydan and Farzin Nadimi: “when the Marshall Islands-flagged oil/chemical tanker Ardmore Encounter (IMO 9654579) was attacked in December 2023, it was owned by Ireland-based Ardmore Shipping and had no clear links to Israel. Two weeks later, a report by TradeWinds untangled the case of mistaken identity—the strike was seemingly driven by the belief that Israeli shipping magnate Idan Ofer had a stake in the company, but Ofer’s shares had been sold off months before the attack.”

The Houthis also expanded their targets to those from countries allied with Israel, especially the U.S. and U.K. Between the number of ships under those flags and the exponential possibilities for mistakes, shipping through that route was soon dominated by Russia and China because Western firms were steering clear. Yet, as Raydan and Nadimi notes, “the Houthis have attacked a few vessels linked to Russia’s oil trade, once again based on inaccurate data. Even two Iran-bound bulk carriers were attacked in the Red Sea in February and May 2024.”

Russia and China are the main beneficiaries of the Houthi attacks, though nobody is truly safe.

Now let’s go to the second lie: that this is merely additional Gaza “resistance” and therefore poses no wider threat. To understand the full extent of this one, it’s worth reviewing the widespread damage that the Houthis’ Red Sea terrorism has caused, the benefits to the Houthis themselves, and what both tell us about future uses of these tactics.
Israeli FM Sa’ar: Hamas not ready to disarm
Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar on Tuesday dismissed the idea that the Hamas terrorist organization is prepared to lay down its arms.

“I don’t see any indication that Hamas is ready to disarm,” Sa’ar said in an interview with ABC News chief national correspondent Matt Gutman.

Sa’ar emphasized that if Hamas were to disarm, it would significantly alter the current conflict. “That would be a huge development—one that could change the entire equation. But up until now, they have been very clear and decisive that they will not disarm,” he said.

Instead, Sa’ar said Hamas appears to be considering an alternative approach modeled after Hezbollah in Lebanon. “They are looking at a different approach, something similar to the Hezbollah model—allowing someone else to handle the ruins they left behind in the Gaza Strip while they remain the most powerful military force there. Their goal is to continue the war against Israel,” he said.

This, he continued, “is totally unacceptable. For us, there is no way to guarantee our security without the complete disarmament of the Gaza Strip—Hamas, Islamic Jihad, all of them.”

The Israeli government has repeatedly defined the dismantlement of Hamas’s military capabilities as a key war goal.



Disclaimer: the views expressed here are solely those of the author, weekly Judean Rose columnist Varda Meyers Epstein.

Does damage to the environment incurred in the course of fighting a defensive war constitute a war crime? Of course not, but that hasn’t stopped those who hate Israel from accusing the Jewish State of committing “ecocide.” That’s right: they’ve coined a cute word for it that combines “ecology” with genocide. It’s a myth, but who cares? If you can bash Israel for public consumption, it’s fine.

The Guardian accused Israel of ecocide a year ago, using almost 1800 words to make the point. One of the three authors of this screed is Aseel Mousa, a “freelance journalist based in Gaza.” (What? You were expecting the Guardian to keep its content bias-free—this was anything but that.):

‘Ecocide in Gaza’: does scale of environmental destruction amount to a war crime?

In a dilapidated warehouse in Rafah, Soha Abu Diab is living with her three young daughters and more than 20 other family members. They have no running water, no fuel and are surrounded by running sewage and waste piling up.

Like the rest of Gaza’s residents, they fear the air they breathe is heavy with pollutants and that the water carries disease. Beyond the city streets lie razed orchards and olive groves, and farmland destroyed by bombs and bulldozers.

“This life is not life,” says Abu Diab, who was displaced from Gaza City. “There is pollution everywhere – in the air, in the water we bathe in, in the water we drink, in the food we eat, in the area around us.”

For her family and thousands of others, the human cost of Israel’s invasion of Gaza, launched after the Hamas attack on 7 October, is being compounded by an environmental crisis.

The full extent of the damage in Gaza has not yet been documented, but analysis of satellite imagery provided to the Guardian shows the destruction of about 38-48% of tree cover and farmland.

Olive groves and farms have been reduced to packed earth; soil and groundwater have been contaminated by munitions and toxins; the sea is choked with sewage and waste; the air polluted by smoke and particulate matter.

Researchers and environmental organisations say the destruction will have enormous effects on Gaza’s ecosystems and biodiversity. The scale and potential long-term impact of the damage have led to calls for it to be regarded as “ecocide” and investigated as a possible war crime.

Yup. That’s what happens when you gang-rape Israelis, murder families, and take hostages to Gaza where you torture and starve them and keep them underground for over 500 days. But wait, there’s more. The authors tell us that IDF “says” it follows international law, which is supposed to make this a balanced piece—except for the impression the reader receives, which is that Israel is being less than forthright:

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) says it follows international law and attempts to limit damage to agricultural areas and the environment.

“The IDF does not intentionally harm agricultural land and seeks to prevent environmental impact absent operational necessity,” it told the Guardian.

Satellite imagery, photos and video footage from the ground show how Gaza’s farmland, orchards and olive groves have been destroyed by the war.

Perhaps the authors regretted giving Israel even that much credit, because a few paragraphs later, they inform the reader that actually, Israel is destroying Gaza’s environment on purpose. It’s “systematic,” they say, pointing to repeated aerial bombardments in specific locations vulnerable to ecological damage.

Samaneh Moafi, FA’s assistant director of research, describes the destruction as systematic.

Researchers used satellite imagery to document a repeated process in multiple locations, she says: after initial damage from aerial bombardment, ground troops arrived and dismantled greenhouses completely, while tractors, tanks and vehicles uprooted orchards and fields of crops.

“What’s left is devastation,” says Moafi. “An area that is no longer livable.”

The thrust of the Guardian piece is that the ecological fallout from the war Gaza started is not simply war-induced ecological damage, but a purposeful attempt to destroy Gazan wildlife, pollute the air that Gazans breathe and the water they drink, and make it impossible for Gazan farmers to grow food.

Abeer al-Butmeh, the coordinator of the Palestinian Environmental NGOs Network, says: “The Israeli occupation has completely damaged all elements of life and all environmental elements in Gaza – they completely destroyed the agriculture and wildlife.

“What is happening is, for sure, ecocide,” she says. “[It] is completely damaging the environment in Gaza for the long term, not only for the short term.

“Palestinian people have a strong relationship with the land – they are very connected to their land and also to the sea,” she says. “People in Gaza cannot live without fishing, without farming.

FA says: “The destruction of agricultural land and infrastructure in Gaza is a deliberate act of ecocide.

“The targeted farms and greenhouses are fundamental to local food production for a population already under a decades-long siege. The effects of this systematic agricultural destruction are exacerbated by other deliberate acts of deprivation of critical resources for Palestinian survival in Gaza.

Well, maybe they should have thought of that before they murdered more than 1,200 people with unprecedented cruelty, and took 251 people hostage. Not to be outdone by the Guardian, Reuters also weighed in on the ecological damage that those mean Israelis did to the “innocent” people of Gaza. But that’s okay. They’re just repeating what the UN told them—and we all know how the UN lavishes untold amounts of love for Israel:

Gaza conflict has caused major environmental damage, UN says

The conflict in Gaza has created unprecedented soil, water and air pollution in the region, destroying sanitation systems and leaving tons of debris from explosive devices, a United Nations report on the environmental impact of the war said on Tuesday.

The war between Israel and Hamas, the Islamist movement that controls the Gaza Strip, has swiftly reversed limited progress in improving the region's water desalination and wastewater treatment facilities, restoring the Wadi Gaza coastal wetland, and investments in solar power installations, according to a preliminary assessment, opens new tab from the U.N. Environment Programme (UNEP).

Explosive weapons have generated some 39 million tons of debris, the report said. Each square metre of the Gaza Strip is now littered with more than 107 kilograms (236 lbs) of debris. That is more than five times the debris generated during the battle for Mosul, Iraq, in 2017, the report said.

"All of this is deeply harming people's health, food security and Gaza's resilience," said UNEP Executive Director Inger Andersen.

Gaza's environment was already suffering from recurring conflicts, rapid urban growth, and high population density, before the most recent conflict began on Oct. 7.

Interesting how the conflict simply “began” on October 7, as opposed to Israel responding to an attack of unprecedented cruelty by Gaza. Even now, they torture our captives. President Trump remarked on the fact that not a single Gazan person has been kind to hostages or given them a bit of hope:

“I said, ‘Did you see anybody in there [who] was kind out of the hundreds of people that you were seeing [from] Hamas? Did some of them wink at you and say, ‘Don’t worry, you’re going to be okay, or give you a piece of bread?’ ‘No.’

“I said, ‘Were there any people that were like kind? I was shocked. The answer was nobody. There was nobody. Just the opposite. They’d be slapped and punched. One man broke his ribs. He couldn’t breathe for a month. It was brutal."

But none of the people with their accusations of ecocide care about kindness to hostages. They are also not kind. In fact, you will not find a single mention of the captives in any of their long-winded allegations of a supposedly deliberate Israeli campaign to destroy the environment of Gaza. They don’t want you to know what Gaza did and is still doing to Israel. They don’t want you to know what Hamas did to the Bibas babies and their mother.

No. They don’t want you to know any of that. Instead, they tell you that Israel just went into Gaza and destroyed all the trees, air, land, and water for no reason (those horrible Jews). Take the University of California Global Health Institute (UCGHI). In its report on the so-called “ecocide” in Gaza, there is not a single mention of the captives. It’s all about the nasty, nasty Jews:

Ecocide in Gaza: Israel's genocide in Gaza will create an unprecedented environmental health crisis

As Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza continues, thousands of Palestinians continue to drown in death and disease. The environmental devastation in Gaza, however, is an often overlooked but critical aspect of the ongoing genocide by Israel on Palestine. The relentless assaults on Gaza have not only caused immense human suffering but have also inflicted severe and lasting damage on the environment, transforming the region into a toxic wasteland. This environmental demolition, referred to as "ecocide," is a deliberate strategy that compounds the humanitarian crisis and poses a long-term threat to the region's sustainability and the health of its inhabitants.

One might have guessed that Greenpeace would jump on the blame Israel ecocide libel. They really, really hate Israel. It’s to be expected. Tree huggers tend not to like Jews. Or shall we say they’d rather hug a tree than a Jew. Greenpeace Legal Researcher Farah Al Hattab has no problem calling the environmental damage to Gaza, “deliberate.” The words “captives” and “hostages” do not once appear in her “ecocide” report:

Scorched-earth: making Gaza uninhabitable for generations to come

Concepts such as “ecocide” have been used by experts and NGOs to describe the ongoing deliberate destruction of Gaza’s environment. A recent satellite analysis reveals that “the scale and long-term impact of the destruction have led to calls for it to be investigated as a potential war crime, and to be classed as ecocide, which covers damage done to the environment by deliberate or negligent actions.”

International law requires Israel to bear the cost of rebuilding Gaza, given its recognised responsibility as an occupying power.
Al Hattab concludes her rant with a poignant reference to seeing genocide with her “own eyes,” by which she means she’s seeing it on her phone:

I am witnessing an unfolding genocide with my own eyes, through my phone – a haunting first hand documentation of horror. As long as Israel is not held accountable for the blood it has shed in my region, I fear the Gazans’ fate is coming for the rest of us.

The “ecocide” label is brand spanking new, born in the wake of the October 7 attack on Israel. But before there was “ecocide” there was “environmental Apartheid.” In 2022, the Institute for Middle East Understanding (IMEU) published a handy-dandy fact sheet which speaks of a deliberate, systematic attempt by Israel to destroy the ecology in Gaza. It’s the longest fact sheet I’ve ever seen at more than 2,500 words. Rather than bore my readers to tears, I’ve opted to provide only a small taste (don’t vomit): 

Environmental apartheid refers to Israel’s systematic exploitation of the environment in Palestine/Israel and the discriminatory system by which Palestinians are dispossessed of their land, water, and other natural resources, while being disproportionately impacted by ecological damage caused by Israel.

Israel’s environmental apartheid is harmful to the climate and violates the human rights of Palestinians, and is part of Israel’s broader system of apartheid against Palestinians, both inside Israel’s internationally recognized borders and in the territories it has militarily occupied since 1967 (the West Bank, East Jerusalem, Gaza). To detract attention from its abuses of Palestinian human rights, Israel engages in “greenwashing,” promoting itself as an eco-friendly country even as its policies and actions cause tremendous harm to the environment and to Palestinians.

According to the United Nations Development Programme: "So pervasive are the effects of the Israeli occupation on the climate vulnerability of Palestinian communities that the occupation – in and of itself – is considered here a ‘risk’, alongside environmental risks such as sea-level rise and altered rainfall patterns."

The naked deceit inherent in this narrative of a deliberate, systematic, and unprovoked attempt by Israel to destroy the environment in Gaza should turn the stomach of every decent human being. Where is the mention of the 1,500 cars burned by Hamas on October 7—cars with families still inside them—their corpses burned to a crisp?


And where is the mention of the exploding balloons that Gaza regularly sends into Israel? Not to mention the fifty million dollars’ worth of condoms that Biden sent to Hamas that were blown up like balloons and sent into Israel with incendiary devices attached to them—the idea being that little children would clamor for the “balloons” and get blown up?



Little Jewish children are not the only target of the incendiary balloons and condoms. Murdering Jews is considered a fun time for Gazan Arabs, but burning down Israeli farms is definitely a close second. In general, Arabs enjoy exploding and burning things. Arab arson is rampant in Israel. Does it really matter if the Arab doing the burning is from the PA administered territories of from the Hamas administered territories? A rose by any other name would smell like ash and smoke. 

From July:

AND THEN there are the multiple brush and forest fires persistently being lit every day in Judea and Samaria by Palestinian terrorists in an attempt to literally smoke Israeli farmers, ranchers, and settlers out of the area.

Over the past months, firefighters have battled well over 1,000 fires in Judea and Samaria, many of them adjacent to Jewish towns and Israeli army bases, almost all of them certainly caused by arson.

This included difficult-to-control fires around the community of Peduel, on the western ridge of Samaria, and adjacent to Elon Moreh, an Israeli town of 2,000 people in the Samarian highlands; fires near Revava, Shavei Shomron, Karnei Shomron, Salit, Nahal Shiloh, Yitzhar, Givat Itamar, Tzur Harel, Oz Zion, and Kochav Hashachar; in Gush Etzion and the Jordan Valley; near the important IDF base on Mount Hazor near Ofra, near the Mount Kabir base above Nablus, and adjacent to the “Ofrit” base on Mount Scopus on the eastern ridges of Jerusalem.

And every single day, Palestinians and their extreme left-wing Israeli anarchist allies torch the grazing grounds of cattle in the central Binyamin and Samaria highlands where pioneering Israelis have established a string of some 100 ranches (in Hebrew: havot) – or as Western media and hostile NGOs call them, “wildcat settler outposts.”

The grass and brush that grows in the vast and mostly unsettled parts of Binyamin and Samaria are “natural gold” for feeding these herds of cattle and flocks of sheep.

Burning the pastures is outright warfare, designed to firebomb Jewish “settler sheep” off the land and drive settlers from the area.

This is not too different from the devastation caused by thousands of incendiary balloons and kites sent over the Gaza border by Hamas since 2018, firebombs that destroyed tens of thousands of acres of nature reserves and farmland in southern Israel. (Experts say it will take years to rehabilitate the burned farm fields in southern Israel.)


Arab arson has been a serious problem in Israel for a very long time, causing damage to forests, farms, and wildlife, and polluting Israel’s air and water. Beginning in 2016, Arabs setting fires became a regular feature, especially in summer. But it wasn’t like it was a new tactic. The LA Times reported on the damage from Arab arson already way back in 1988:

Fires Destroy 60 Acres of Israel Forests: Arab Arson Blamed; Shamir Sees Threat to National Survival

JERUSALEM — Fires attributed to Arab arsonists destroyed more than 60 acres of treasured forest in northern Israel today, and a rash of stone throwing signaled new momentum in the 6 1/2-month-old Palestinian uprising.

Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir called the new wave of violence an attempt to destroy the Jewish state.

“There is a wave of aggression, whether arson or murder, against the Jewish presence everywhere in the land of Israel,” Shamir told Israel army radio. “The problem is one of survival.”

Police, firefighters and volunteers, backed by army helicopters and planes, were on alert for arson. The uprising’s leaders had ordered Palestinians to set fire today to Israel’s farms, forests and factories.

Eight fires erupted, and all but one of those were of suspicious origins, police said. David Angel, spokesman for the Jewish National Fund, said that was less than the 18 average daily fires last week.

“It’s because we had so many people out looking,” he said.

The largest fire scorched 50 acres of woodlands in Mt. Gilboa, 70 miles north of Jerusalem, some of it part of a reforestation program. The blaze began overnight.

“You see years of work go up in smoke in a few minutes,” Avraham Yariv, head of the Gilboa Regional Council, told Israel radio. “You stand helpless before this terrible sight.”

Yariv said the fire was obviously arson because it started in four places.

Angel said another blaze destroyed 10 acres of woodlands near Kfar Qassem, north of Tel Aviv. “This was a young forest first planted a couple of years ago,” he said.

Loss of Trees Painful

The destruction of trees is especially painful to Israelis, who take pride in having made the desert bloom. Many of the trees were bought by American Jews in memory of relatives.

Police Commissioner David Krauss said the fires were set by Palestinians, some of them as young as 8 or 9.

In the last two months, fires have destroyed 35,000 acres in Israel, much of it cherished farmland and forest, about 10 times last year’s total.

Arab arson is a common occurrence in Israel, especially in summer. The devastation almost defies description. From Aug. 10 2012:

A wave of fires has hit Israeli in recent weeks. Police believe most of the fires were started by Arab arsonists as a form of terrorist attack.

Nature and Parks Authority head Shaul Goldstein told Arutz Sheva that the damage done by the fires is even greater than some realize. “These fires – beyond destroying the plant life, they completely destroy the animal life, from small animals to large animals,” he said.

“Our job is to rehabilitate the area after the fire,” he continued. He called on the public to help by reporting any fire, no matter how small. “A small fire can be put out with a cup of water, but a large fire cannot be put out by even 10 firefighting planes.”
A June 2019 story offers a bit of a timeline of Arab arson in Israel from 2016 and onward:

Israel has been facing weeks of ongoing fires in recent weeks. Fifty families have been left homeless, countless animals have died, and thousands of acres of land have been destroyed, including pristine forests in central Israel.

The media framed the fires as the result of the high heat temperature - until the investigations began.

"Hundreds of the fires in the last weeks in Jerusalem and Beit Shemesh area were a result of arson," Kan News reported.

Here are the facts from the wave of fires that began in Israel on November 2016:

Firefighters have fought 1,773 fires.

In Haifa for example, 527 apartments were destroyed leaving 1,600 people homeless. 75,000 residents were evacuated and more than 20,000 dunams of forests burnt.

After a thorough investigation, it was determined that out of 80 fires that were checked, 71 were the result of arson.

Firefighter Ran Shlaf, considered the premier authority in fire investigations in the country said: “Yes. We've faced arson terror. There is no dilemma or doubt about it. All the villages that were burned were Jewish, and all those arrested or prosecuted were Arabs. And from a thorough investigation we conducted, no one else in the Middle East - including the Palestinians - experienced such an extreme wave of fires like we experienced".

A year earlier, in June 2018, Israel National News damage the damage from incendiary balloons and kites—yes, kites, too. Nothing like a kite or a balloon to catch the eye of a Jewish child and make them want to pick it up and play with it. Naturally these Arab arsonists love the thought of blowing up Jewish children:

Firefighters on Saturday worked to extinguish 24 fires which broke out in Gaza border towns due to incendiary kites and balloons sent into Israeli territory by Gazan arson terrorists.

All of the fires are now under control.

The kites and balloons sent into Israel are armed with firebombs and other explosives. Some of them have landed in private homes and near kindergartens and playgrounds, and others have sparked fires in populated areas. Most of the incendiary kites and balloons have caused agricultural damage, scorching fields of wheat and produce.

As of the beginning of June, the arson terror had caused 5 million NIS ($1.4 million) in damage, and scorched over 5,000 dunam (1,235 acres) of land.

In September of 2024, the JNS reported that Arabs burned down homes in Halamish and caused extensive damage to a nearby forest:

Palestinian rioters targeted Neve Tzuf (also known as Halamish) in the Binyamin region of Samaria on Thursday, throwing Molotov cocktails at the village.

The attack resulted in a rapidly spreading fire, forcing the evacuation of residents in the first few houses near the edge of the community.

It took two firefighting planes and several firefighting teams to bring the blaze under control. The terrorists responsible for the attack fled towards the nearby village of Deir Nidham.

Deputy Commander Ido Peretz of the Binyamin Regional Fire Station detailed the response: “Due to our knowledge of the area and understanding of the threats, numerous teams were dispatched from the Binyamin Regional Fire Station, as well as assistance from neighboring stations in the Judea and Samaria district and inter-district support.”

He added, “This is a forest located within the town, and at this time, the fire is moving with the help of the winds. A pair of firefighting planes from the Elad squadron are on their way to the location to assist in extinguishing the fire.”

By Thursday afternoon, there was no longer any danger to residents, but the nearby forest was badly damaged and there was tremendous damage to ecological systems and wildlife . . .

 . . . This is not the first time that Neve Tzuf has been targeted. In 2016, another Palestinian arson attack struck the town, destroying 23 homes and causing severe damage to several others.

A statement from Neve Tzuf administration back then highlighted the ongoing threat: “The light punishment given to the terrorists who carried out the attack serves as inspiration for every copycat terrorist. With the simple means of a Molotov cocktail, they cause immense damage that takes many years to repair, if it can be repaired at all.

In December of 2018, there was finally a winter lull from all the warm weather arson, a lull long enough for the Israel Nature and Parks Authority to take stock:

The four-month arson terrorism campaign, part of the campaign of border violence orchestrated by the Hamas terrorist group that rules the Gaza Strip, has resulted in appalling damage: Some 32,000 dunams (7,900 acres) of Israeli fields, parks and other lands have been reduced to ash.

The report found that 12,086 dunams (2,987 acres) of national parks and nature reserves, 9,873 dunams (2,440 acres) of JNF-owned land, 4,237 dunams (1,047 acres) of agricultural fields and 6,085 dunams (1,504 acres) of open land have been burned. Since the arson terrorism began, 14% of all nature reserves in the region bordering the Gaza Strip have been lost to fire.

The worst-hit areas are the Be'eri Crater Nature Reserve, 78% of which has been burned, and the Kurkar Niram Nature Reserve, 77% of which has been burned. Fifty percent of the Karmiya Nature Reserve, 30% of the Reches Gvaram Reserve, 27% of Nahal Grar Park, and 21% of the Besor Nature Reserve have also been lost to the fires.

The parks authority is concerned that invasive plant species could replace local plants and cause more damage. Workers are taking care to root out invasive species, and next spring, after the winter rains, the authorities plan to inspect the damaged areas for any changes to the plant life.

The fires have annihilated wildlife as well as flora. The bee-eater birds indigenous to the Besor Reserve are gone, their nests having been lost, and Be'eri's wild turtle population has suffered a critical blow.

As well as destroying animal habitats, Hamas also used animals to set the fires, releasing hawks into Israel to which operatives had attached burning fuses.

According to the INPA, the fires have caused some 15 million shekels ($4 million) in damage to nature reserves alone and the amount of territory lost will make it too difficult for the nature reserves to rehabilitate themselves, requiring human intervention.

"We are now seeing the scope of the damage caused to the nature reserves, and it's immense," said INPA Southern District Director Gilad Gabbai. "Most of the Be'eri Reserve has been burned, and it almost doesn't have the resources for renewal. It's a really tough blow. We need to take more aggressive action that wasn't needed in the past. We need to intervene, as opposed other places, where we're protecting the ecosystem from outside and allowing it to recover naturally."

Of course, if you call the Arabs on their arson and destruction, they’ll tell you they are totally innocent. It was the Jews who did it—burned down their own farms and forests and homes, just to make Arabs look bad. Or something. The funny thing is, journalists and college students and horrible UN people believe them, no matter how flimsy the story, no matter how skimpy the evidence that anyone but an Arab caused these fires.

One thing we can say for the Arab arsonists is that they are ecumenical. They’ll target Jews. They’ll target Arabs. They don’t care whose farms, homes, and forests they burn. The main thing is to say that the Jews did it.


Israel didn’t ask for October 7. It did ask for its hostages. And when the hostages didn’t come home, Israel was forced to fight a war it never asked for, a war it was forced to fight because of the unimaginable horrors wrought by Arabs against innocent men, women, and children on October 7. Did they really think we’d look the other way?

Probably not. But it’s all good. Now the Arabs of Gaza and their legions of antisemitic friends, can talk about Jews committing Apartheid, genocide and ecocide, in other words all the things PA- and Hamas-ruled Arabs have done all these years to the Jews. We don’t dare go into their towns but they walk freely through Jerusalem, ride alongside us on buses, and operate on us in Israeli hospitals. They’ve systematically and deliberately murdered Jews with cars, axes, boulders, knives, rockets, bombs, and more. They’ve systematically and deliberately burned down farms, forests, nature reserves, and wreaked havoc on Israel’s flora and fauna, Israel’s air and water.

Blaming the Jews for their own misdeeds is not new for the Arabs of Gaza. “Ecocide” is just a marketing tool. What are they marketing? Jew-hate.

Here in Israel, we also worry about the ecology and the damage that Arabs have caused in our homeland. But while “ecocide” due to Arab arson, bombs, rockets, balloons and condoms is a serious problem for Israel, right now, we worry more about “kinocide.” Also brought to us by Gaza.

The word “kinocide” originates from a report by the Civil Commission on October 7 Crimes by Hamas against Women and Children:

What is Kinocide?

[In] coining the term kinocide, the report exposes the deliberate, widespread exploitation and destruction of familial bonds to intensify victims’ suffering, highlighting the profound and lasting harm inflicted on individuals, communities, and societies. [Dr. Cochav Elkayam-Levy] noted that the Dvora Institute calls for urgent international recognition of the term as it describes a new, distinct international crime against humanity and presents legal and policy recommendations to close gaps in international criminal law, ensure accountability, and prevent such atrocities in the future.

GENOCIDE, AS practiced by the Nazis, is directed against a group of people – “national, ethnical, racial or religious,” according to the UN’s 1948 Genocide Convention – but kinocide is a specific type of assault against a group, using the relationship between family members and their emotional, identity, cultural, symbolic, material and other bonds, as a way to maximize the intended harm of the attack.

On October 7, Arabs broke the ceasefire with Israel, breaching its border and committing kinocide. Perhaps some are naïve enough to think that if the Arabs release our hostages, we’ll lay down our arms. But we’ve had enough of the Arab Apartheid, genocide, ecocide, and kinocide of our people, the indigenous people of Israel. This time, they aren’t going to get away with the damage and the war crimes.

We won’t wait for the UN and their resolutions, or the ICC with its lies and threats. We will take out this trash. We will take out Amalek. And that’s a promise. You might even say a covenant.

Purim Sameach.

Bonus! A Purim Drinking Game: Drink shots of bourbon until you don’t know the difference between Trump and Biden. Let me know how it goes. *laughs nefariously*



Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon!

"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024)

PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

   
 

 



  • Wednesday, March 12, 2025
  • Elder of Ziyon
The Arabic version of France24's fact check site The Observers lists a bunch of antisemitic conspiracy theories, all of which are laughably false, that have gained some currency among the US far right.

All of them were published by a single X account, SaltyGirl09.

These theories include:

Claim: Israelis were in Amsterdam waving the Ukrainian flag and chanting "We will rape white women and drink your blood."  
Fact check: "In fact, this video has nothing to do with Ukraine. A reverse image search using Google Lens reveals the original version of the clip on YouTube. The video was filmed in October 2016, not in Amsterdam, but in the Dutch city of Alkmaar. The video shows fans of the Israeli soccer team Maccabi Tel Aviv performing songs by the fan group "Maccabi Fanatics" as part of a trip to face the Dutch city's team in the Europa League. Although the Maccabi Tel Aviv fans were indeed wearing yellow and blue, these colors were not a reference to Ukraine but rather the colors of the Israeli team's jersey." (The song, while hugely offensive, does not say they want to rape "white women.")

Claim: 

Fact check:  The video was not filmed in March of this year, as claimed by the owner of the @SaltyGirl09 account on X, but in October 2024. The Ukrainian city of Uman is a sacred pilgrimage site for Jews, particularly Orthodox Jews, especially with the start of the Jewish New Year, Rosh Hashanah.


Claim:
Fact check: "Volodymyr Zelensky's statement was taken out of context. The Atlantic Council article , published in April 2022, refers to an article in the Israeli daily Haaretz . Haaretz quoted Volodymyr Zelensky as saying during his speech that he wanted Ukraine to become a "Greater Israel." His intent was to replicate the security and military structure of the Jewish state, not an Israeli political or religious project."

Claim: 

Fact check: "Although the governments of Ukraine and the United Kingdom had already signed a 100-year partnership on January 16, 2025, to strengthen security and diplomatic ties between the two parties, this treaty bears no relation to the 1917 Balfour Declaration. Unlike the latter, the Kyiv-London Association Agreement contains no reference to support for the establishment of a Jewish state in Ukraine, nor does it contain any reference to the Jewish faith."






Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon!

"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024)

PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

   
 

 

  • Wednesday, March 12, 2025
  • Elder of Ziyon
CNN writes a backgrounder about Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia University leader of the antisemitic CUAD group.
In an interview with CNN last spring, Khalil said he was born a Palestinian refugee in Syria, but his family is from Tiberias, an Israeli city that was once known for its mixed Jewish and Arab population.

During the Arab-Israeli War in 1948, Palestinians were forcibly removed from cities like Tiberias in what became known as “The Nakba,” or catastrophe.
The New York Times uses almost identical language:
Mr. Khalil was born and raised in Syria because his grandparents were forcibly removed from their ancestral home in Tiberias, now part of Israel, according to his lawyers’ legal filing. 
Indeed, the legal brief does make that claim, employing a footnote that does not support it at all. 
Mahmoud Khalil is Palestinian, but he was born and raised in Syria because his grandparents were forcibly removed from their ancestral home in Tiberias, Palestine.
It is simply not true.

Efraim Karsh summarized what happened in Tiberias in 1948:
Five months after waging his war of annihilation on the Yishuv, the Mufti's strategy had backfired in grand style. His forces, together with the ALA, had been routed, and Palestinian Arab society had been profoundly shattered, with tens of thousands of terrified and disorientated Arabs taking to the road. On April 18, another milestone in the war was passed when, after a few days of fighting, the Hagana made its first urban gain, capturing the mixed-population city of Tiberias, overlooking the Sea of Galilee, where some 6,000 Jews and about as many Arabs were living.

Ignoring pleas by the local Jewish leadership to stay put, the Arabs acting on the orders of the Nazareth National Committee and on the advice of local British commanders chose to leave Tiberias en masse and were evacuated by the British army. 
Contemporaneous accounts support this.

The Jews and Arabs of Tiberias signed a treaty of non-aggression. Yet Iraqi troops, and possibly Syrians with a former Nazi officer (1948, Benny Morris, p. 199), moved in and started attacking the Jews. 

The Palestine Post, April 9, 1948, describes how the Jews were forced to evacuate their homes under fire.


Eight Jews were killed and the Haganah responded. (April 11, 1948)


The Arab residents  chose to flee under the advice of their leaders and the British, who helped evacuate them with their lorries. (April 21)


Benny Morris largely agrees:
The Haganah occupied key Arab areas and demanded surrender. The Jewish commanders vetoed the idea of a "truce," and the Arab notables, perhaps on their own initiative, perhaps heeding British advice, decided on an evacuation of the population.  The British imposed a curfew and assembled a fleet of trucks. Then, on 18 April, escorted by British armored cars, the Arab population was trucked out in separate convoys east-ward to Jordan and westward to ALA-held Nazareth. 

But two remained. (April 22)


No one was forcibly evicted. It was a decision by Arab leaders to leave (partially because of false rumors of a massacre nearby.) 

But why would the media doubt what an ardent Hamas supporter says?

The lies about 1948 are echoed today. Arab propaganda and lies work, just as they did 75 years ago. 

(h/t A Human Being)






Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon!

"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024)

PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

   
 

 

Master propagandist Peter Beinart  has written a polemic in The Guardian, adapted from his most recent book, that can only be described as antisemitic.

He describes the Jews of the Purim story as being genocidal:
 The book of Esther doesn’t end with Haman’s death. It continues because although Haman is gone, his edict to kill the Jews remains. The king can’t reverse it. What he can do is empower Mordechai and his kinsmen to take matters into their own hands. Which they do. “The Jews struck at their enemies with the sword,” proclaims the book of Esther, “slaying and destroying; they wreaked their will upon their enemies.” On the 13th day of the month of Adar, the Jews kill 75,000 people. They declare the 14th “a day of feasting and merrymaking”. With the blood of their foes barely dry, the Jews feast and make merry. That’s the origin of Purim.

Purim isn’t only about the danger Gentiles pose to us. It’s also about the danger we pose to them.

...My hope, this Purim, is that when Jews encounter the slaughter that concludes the Book of Esther, we shudder. And that from this revulsion comes a new dedication to ending the slaughter being committed in our name in the Gaza Strip.

Beinart admits that the Jews of Persia had no choice but to proactively attack those who wanted to wipe them out. The king cannot reverse the edict. What else could be done? Yet even so, Beinart wants to frame the Jews defending their lives as a genocidal attack. He doesn't use that word here but his comparison with Gaza and his separate embrace of the lie that Israel is guilty of genocide makes this clear.

The analogy between the Gaza war and the Purim battles is apt, for the opposite reason. Hamas' charter and Haman's edict were both to exterminate the Jews. In both cases the Jewish goal was to eradicate only those who will stop at nothing in their attempts to utterly destroy the Jewish community. That is not immoral - on the contrary, self defense against those who want to murder you is supremely moral. That is the Jewish perspective. The only genocides are the ones that Haman and Hamas planned. 

Beinart is upset that secular Jews aren't aware of the entire Purim story and gloss over the brief war mentioned in the Book of Esther. So am I. The war was justified and the killings as described in the story were justified as well. 

Peter Beinart is not the first person to accuse Jews of genocide in the Purim story. It is a staple of antisemites.  Beinart's perversion is to make this accusation while posing as a committed Jew.

Beinart will quote Jewish sources when they are convenient for him. He writes, as a Jew, "We have largely stopped wrestling with what our sacred texts say about Jewish ethical responsibility. " Yet this is what Beinart himself is doing - ignoring what the sacred texts say about Jewish self-defense. 

Beinart cherry-picks Jewish sensitivity to violence but ignores how tradition distinguishes between what is and is not allowed in battle. He knows quite well that the Hebrew Scriptures, Talmud and Jewish commentators are critical of misconduct and excesses in war and other violence. When Levi and Simeon slaughtered the residents of Shechem, they were criticized by Jacob and this was reiterated on his deathbed. The Jewish sages noted that God rebuked the angels for singing as the Egyptians drowned, with God saying, “My creations are drowning, and you sing?" 

Yet there is no such criticism of war against Amalek - except of Saul for not following Gods instructions to destroy them totally. The war in Esther was written as a clear analogy to the justified - and commanded - wars against Amalek, as Haman is regarded as a descendant of that people. Indeed, no classical Jewish commentary says a word against the destruction of the enemies of the Jews in Persia, and the sages were not reluctant to criticize actions that they felt were immoral. 

It isn't that Jews aren't sensitive to unnecessary deaths, as Beinart's libels imply. It is that there is a big difference between obligatory wars, such as those motivated by self defense, and wars that go beyond the necessity.  The battle in Persia was clear in its goals and its morality,  hence no criticism. 

Beinart pretends that he is more moral than the Jewish sages he himself claims that are a source of his ethical stance. Instead of understanding and learning from the sages, he arrogantly pretends to be more virtuous than they are. 

Worse, Beinart’s depiction of Jews ‘feasting with blood barely dry’ revives medieval blood libel imagery, a hallmark of antisemitic propaganda, while cloaking it in progressive critique.

And he has the nerve to promote his book with these antisemitic arguments while posing in front of the very sacred texts that he is throwing in the garbage.


Jews know quite well what the lessons of history are, thank you very much. Beinart's claim that Jews do not properly learn from their own traditions is nothing less than a sophisticated version of the antisemitic argument that the Jews should have learned more from the Holocaust. 




Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon!

"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024)

PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

   
 

 

  • Wednesday, March 12, 2025
  • Elder of Ziyon


Last year, Columbia University turned Jewish students into fugitives on their own campus. Need to study? Call an escort. Want to avoid the anti-Israel mob? Sneak through a back door. The “Safe Passage Liaison” wasn’t protection—it was a surrender to antisemites who faced no consequences for turning swaths of campus into no-go zones for Jews.  

Columbia protected the antisemites more than they protected the Jews - the antisemites had no restrictions on their movement. Yet this  “Safe Passage Liaison” was framed as a way of defending Jews.

That travesty is emblematic of President Biden’s approach to antisemitism: bubble-wrap the victims, not battle the hate. 

He signed generic acts against hate crimes. He condemned antisemitic incidents. It was almost all talk. Perhaps the most pro-active thing he did to combat antisemitism was not original to him - he supported Trump's previous executive order asserting that Title VI of the Civil Rights Act prohibits antisemitic and related discrimination in federally funded programs.

Biden's crowning achievement ostensibly against Jew-hatred was the U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism. But it was a failure before it started, not even defining antisemitism. It couldn’t even specify the enemy it claimed to fight.

The focus of the national strategy was passive and defensive - raising awareness, protecting Jewish communities and institutions, fostering cross-community solidarity. DEI was considered a solution for antisemitism, not part of the problem. 

Compare the situation at Columbia University only nine months ago with Columbia now. Columbia is now in the news due to the Trump administration cutting hundreds of millions of dollars of funding because Columbia did little to actually allow Jews to have equal rights on campus - the simple right to walk on campus and to gather in groups without fear. The Trump administration is going after the ringleaders of the antisemitic protests. (Yes, "resistance by all means necessary" and "globalize the intifada" are barely veiled dog-whistles to murder Jews.) 

Biden's efforts were nearly all about protecting Jews at a time when antisemites will always find new ways to attack. Trump's efforts are to go after the antisemites -  against the specific people who make the lives of Jews on campus hell. 

While Biden's focus was "hate," Trump's is antisemitism. He recognizes that not all hate is the same. Watering down attacks on Jews as another form of discrimination does not fight antisemitism at all. It arguably worsens antisemitism because it leans on a "oppressor" and "oppressed" dichotomy that invariably slots Jews as the oppressors (and the people of color who attack Jews as the oppressed.)

Trump's methods are not subtle. They are a sledgehammer. They may hurt people who are not the targets of the actions. Some of the criticisms of Trump's blunt methods have some validity. And I wish he would be as strident against far-Right antisemites as he is against the progressives. 

But for Jews who are embattled on campus, and by extension in the entire country, the way Trump attacks antisemitism allows us to begin to breathe again. 

Whether most Jews recognized it or not, constantly being on the defensive and knowing that the people who want you dead are protected by the same leaders who pledge to defend you was suffocating. There was nothing the Democratic Party would ever do that would put today's antisemites on the defensive, and the Jew haters knew this quite well. They could take over campus buildings and other areas with impunity, covering their faces, knowing that there is almost no chance that they would be punished or expelled. 

Under Trump, the dynamic has changed. When he says he wants to protect Jews, that means going after the antisemites. 

They are the ones who are afraid now, and that is how it should be. 





Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon!

"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024)

PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

   
 

 

Tuesday, March 11, 2025

From Ian:

Seth Mandel: How Trump’s Anti-Semitism Crackdown Has Already Changed Education
The secretary of education is Linda McMahon, and she has moved fast. As the Times notes, four days after her confirmation hearing she had the department announce its prioritization of campus anti-Semitism. McMahon, like the rest of the Trump team, hit the ground running.

Indeed, the speed with which the new administration has taken action on numerous fronts has frequently caught the White House’s targets and the Democratic opposition completely off-guard.

And the higher-education landscape was already changing by the time Trump took office. As of today, 148 schools representing 2.6 million students have adopted policies of “institutional neutrality,” according to the Heterodox Academy. Rather than putting out institutional statements on every passing piece of news, schools officials have balked at such activism ever since the American intifada began. Officials were caught between not wanting to align their schools with Hamas and their fear of student anger at any acknowledgement of Israel’s right to exist.

Fear, cowardice, whatever you want to call it, the universities have succumbed to it rather than stand up for their Jewish students. All those 148 schools adopted neutrality before Trump brought the hammer down on Columbia. Institutional neutrality, therefore, is only going to grow.

Meanwhile, Trump’s executive orders limiting DEI—so-called diversity, equity and inclusion programs that have ended up turning U.S. institutions into playgrounds of racial and ethnic power struggles and a major catalyst of anti-Semitism on campus—have already seen some schools close certain administrative offices. The University of Virginia dissolved its DEI office just days ago.

Focusing on the institutions has, and will continue to have, profound effects on university responses to anti-Semitism. That doesn’t mean the White House is wrong to punish students where appropriate, especially if the universities won’t do so. But so far, Trump’s White House is well on its way to getting schools to discipline their own—or lose the gravy train of taxpayer money. Either eventuality would mark a significant departure from the prevailing, and unacceptable, status quo.
Seth Mandel: Hamas Supporters Know Exactly What They Are Defending
During the course of the 2008-2009 war, Operation Cast Lead, Hamas hid among the civilian population and then ghoulishly embraced the fauxtography trend to deflect blame for the Palestinian deaths that Hamas was responsible for.

In early 2009, the Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg wrote a fiery post about the world’s “pornographic” obsession with anything that can be labeled Jewish moral failure. Goldberg specifically mentioned Hamas’s parading of dead Palestinian babies:

“Why are these pictures so omnipresent? I’ll tell you why, again from firsthand, and repeated, experience: Hamas (and the Aksa Brigades, and Islamic Jihad, the whole bunch) prevents the burial, or even preparation of the bodies for burial, until the bodies are used as props in the Palestinian Passion Play. Once, in Khan Younis, I actually saw gunmen unwrap a shrouded body, carry it a hundred yards and position it atop a pile of rubble — and then wait a half-hour until photographers showed. It was one of the more horrible things I’ve seen in my life. And it’s typical of Hamas. If reporters would probe deeper, they’d learn the awful truth of Hamas. But Palestinian moral failings are not of great interest to many people.”

I recount all this because—as Oct. 7, 2023 and its aftermath showed—the amount of support for Hamas and the obsession with demonizing the Jews, all with the willing collaboration of the media, is a song played on repeat. The details get worse, sure: Both Hamas and the Western media reached new depths of depravity in their own ways over these past 16 months. Hamas’s supporters in the West, meanwhile, gathered in celebration of evil in unprecedented numbers.

One does not want to believe that all or most of these people know what it is they are supporting. One does not want to believe that members of the media are aware of the egregious ethics breaches their outlets routinely engage in. One does not want to believe that the only way to put a stop to this long-running cycle of horror is to destroy Hamas.

But we are now nearly two decades into the era inaugurated by Hezbollah and Hamas in 2006. Supporters of Hamas didn’t abandon their cause when they saw Hamasniks dancing around with the dead bodies of captive children, because it’s what one expects of Hamas. News organizations didn’t institute reforms in 2006 precisely because they expected to be using those same tactics again and again. And Hamas itself is immune to change.

Sure, there’s the occasional ignoramus on the Internet or a college campus. But for the most part, everyone knows what they’re doing here. It’s a depressing realization, but it is our unambiguous reality. And we cannot change that reality unless we face it.
The Government Has a Strong Case for Deporting Hamas Sympathizers
Here in the U.S., the Trump administration has been cracking down on the pro-Hamas movements that have established themselves in the universities. On Saturday, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents detained Mahmoud Khalil, a foreign national holding a green card and affiliated with Columbia University. ICE apparently intends to revoke his residency status for his role in violent campus protests, but yesterday a federal judge ruled that he cannot be deported without his case being heard. Andrew C. McCarthy examines the legality of the deportation attempt:

The Trump administration has . . . chosen a tough case to start with: a lawful permanent resident alien (LPR)—a status in which the alien enjoys the most robust protection that our law provides for non-Americans. Still, the administration should prevail for the reasons best articulated by Secretary of State Marco Rubio: an alien privileged to reside in the United States, even a green-card holder, should not be able to engage in activities that would form a legal basis to exclude the alien from entering our country in the first place.

Section 1182 of federal immigration law controls the categories of aliens who may be excluded from the United States. In the category of national security, the statute mainly targets aliens who have “engaged in terrorist activity,” who are “members” of terrorist organizations, or who have received paramilitary training from terrorist organizations. Fortunately, though, there is additional latitude: an alien may be excluded if he has “endorsed” or “espoused” terrorist activity. . . . The statute defines terrorist activity to include violent attacks and the planning of such attacks. That should be sufficient to bar from entry into the United States aliens who support Hamas.

If the government can prove that Khalil was in a campus group that endorsed or espoused Hamas’s atrocities against Israel, it should be able to deport him regardless of his LPR status. And if it can deport him, there are likely to be thousands of others who can be deported, too—and should be.
From Ian:

Stirrings of Life Amid the Oct. 7 Wreckage of Nir Oz
In February I went to Kibbutz Nir Oz, just over a mile from Gaza, where Hamas and hundreds of "civilians" from Gaza murdered 46 people and abducted 71 on Oct. 7, 2023, more than a quarter of the community's population. Only four houses were undamaged.

Only eight people have come back to Nir Oz so far. Yoav Bazer, 22, who survived on Oct. 7 by hiding, is an overseer of the kibbutz's agriculture. The pomegranate trees are dead, their irrigation system destroyed. But the hardier avocado trees still yield their fruit, and I find Bazer and a team of volunteers picking them.

The dozen volunteers come from all over Israel, working in weeklong shifts. They range in age from 18 to 72. Rina Yakuel Kerzner, a charismatic grandma, says, "My job is to do anything we need to do for Nir Oz. If it is the avocado, if it is preparing in the kitchen, whatever Nir Oz needs, we are here to serve them."

Eyal Kalasquin, another volunteer, is a lawyer in his late 20s. He says, "To walk around here and think that this work was supposed to be done by people that got murdered...it's something very harsh....We sleep in the wreckage of this beautiful place." The kibbutz is still a dark world of blackened houses and shattered windows, with the debris of violence everywhere.

We meet Nili Margalit, 43, a pediatric nurse who was abducted by Hamas on Oct. 7 and released on Dec. 1, 2023, as well as Mor Tzarfati, 42, who survived Oct. 7. They both now live in Kiryat Gat. Neither wants to return to Nir Oz. "I will only come back," says Tzarfati - whose brother and his wife were shot dead on Oct. 7, their three children dying of smoke-asphyxiation - "if the people of Gaza won't be there next to us. We can't live next to people whose aim is to destroy Jews, whose education teaches them to kill us."

Both women have moved notably to the right after the Hamas attacks. Nir Oz was one of the most leftist of Israel's kibbutzim. Its residents spoke habitually of peace, and often had workers from Gaza help in the fields and with construction. But unless a radical solution is found to shift the Gazans elsewhere - or, perhaps even less likely, transform them into peaceful neighbors - Tzarfati won't be back. "Everyone from here who now lives in Kiryat Gat thinks like this," she says.
The World After Gaza: turning the Holocaust against Israel
Pankaj Mishra's polemic features what may be the most shameful minimisation of 7 October committed to print.

In The World After Gaza, left-wing essayist Pankaj Mishra attempts to argue that Israel’s actions in Gaza represent a ‘case study of Western-style impunity’. The fundamental problem with the West, argues Mishra, is that it has sanctified the Holocaust and wilfully ignores crimes of a supposedly equal magnitude.

His goal in The World After Gaza is to knock the Holocaust off its supposedly ill-deserved pedestal. He wants us to see it as just one of many horrors in a modern world shaped by colonialism and slavery. Or, as Mishra puts it, his goal is to ‘reconcile the clashing narratives of the Shoah, slavery and colonialism’. It follows from his premise that the ‘bumper-sticker lesson’ to be drawn from the Holocaust is not ‘Never Again’ – it’s ‘Never Again for Anyone’.

It’s an approach that might appear humane, acknowledging Jewish suffering while suggesting that other human lives are equally valid. Yet it soon becomes clear that this approach serves deeply anti-humanistic ends.

Delegitimising Israel is critical to Mishra’s approach. In his telling, Israel is a colonial power. He takes this argument further to argue that Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians is, in important respects, akin to the Nazis’ treatment of the Jews.

The main flaw in Mishra’s argument is its gross one-sidedness. He demonstrates his familiarity with Jewish writers on the Holocaust, such as Jean Amery, Hannah Arendt and Primo Levi. Yet he suffers from monumental blindspots. In particular he fails to consider the relationship of anti-Semitism to the Holocaust. He acknowledges the scale of the mass killing, but he fails to probe the anti-Semitic motivations driving it. As a result he fails to understand what is unique about the Holocaust.

His misreading of Hannah Arendt is particularly breathtaking. He uses the great German Jewish political thinker to help make his case for downplaying the significance of anti-Semitism. He points to her ‘denial that anti-Semitism alone was to blame for the Shoah and her emphasis on the innate genocidal potential of the modern bureaucratic state’. In reality, Arendt thought the opposite. She argued that anti-Semitism was key to the emergence of the totalitarian horrors of the 20th century.

In The Origins of Totalitarianism, she described anti-Semitism as ‘an outrage to common sense’. She sought to explain ‘the outrageous fact that so small (and, in world politics, so unimportant) a phenomenon as the Jewish question and anti-Semitism could become the catalytic agent for first, the Nazi movement, then a world war, and finally the establishment of death factories’.

For Arendt, anti-Semitism went beyond the mere hatred of Jews. It was a complex phenomenon, in which Jews came to embody the supposed evil of speculative capitalism and Bolshevism. For the Nazis, the only way to purge this evil was to annihilate its supposed bearers.

This attempt to exterminate an entire people is a key element to what makes the Holocaust unique. For the Nazis, all Jews had to be systematically exterminated. That is why, at the Protocol of the Wannsee Conference in 1942, which was called to discuss the ‘Final Solution’, the Nazis referred to 11million Jews. This number included the Jewish populations of all the countries the Nazis planned to occupy, including Britain, Ireland and Switzerland.
Spanish documentary on Oct. 7 massacre premieres for global audience
A Spanish-language documentary on the Hamas-led terrorist attacks in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, told through the eyes of Latino immigrants who were targeted in the country’s south that day, premiered in Los Angeles in February.

The four-part series, “7/O: Testigos del Terror” (“10/7: Witnesses of Terror”), tells the story of the largest single-day attack on the Jewish people since the Holocaust by focusing on Latin Americans living in kibbutzim and other farming villages on the border with Gaza, the largest immigrant group that came under attack.

In Spanish with English subtitles, episodes run about 30 minutes. They chronicle the massacres at the agricultural communities and Nova music festival. The focus is on Spanish-speaking hostages abducted by Hamas into Gaza and survivors of the attack, in addition to the overall story of Latin American immigration to Israel.

“The immigrant story is of immense interest because it is a story that is rarely told at all,” Leah Soibel, founder and CEO of the Miami-based Fuente Latina media organization, which produced the film, told JNS. “This is first and foremost an immigrant story.”

She noted that the film—made by a completely non-Jewish team—has attracted significant interest in both the Jewish and non-Jewish world, and aims to bridge the Latino audience in three continents.

The documentary was shot at the site of the massacres in southern Israel and includes interviews with scores of Spanish-speaking survivors, most prominent among them members of the Bibas family, who have Argentine-Peruvian heritage. The murder by Palestinians in Gaza of abductee Shiri Bibas and her two young sons shocked the world.
‘I fought, and I fought, and I won’: Ex-hostage Omer Wenkert says Hamas release ceremony didn’t humiliate him
Recently released hostage Omer Wenkert, who spent over 500 days in Hamas captivity before being released last month, gives his first interview since his release, speaking to Channel 12’s Almog Boker.

He says that the release ceremony held by Hamas terrorists did not humiliate him.

“I fought, and I fought, and I fought, and I won,” says Wenkert, who was kidnapped from a bomb shelter on the side of the road near the Nova music festival on October 7, 2023.

He says that one of the first things he told his mother upon his release was that he had “defeated captivity.”

AddToAny

Printfriendly

EoZTV Podcast

Podcast URL

Subscribe in podnovaSubscribe with FeedlyAdd to netvibes
addtomyyahoo4Subscribe with SubToMe

search eoz

comments

Speaking

translate

E-Book

For $18 donation








Sample Text

EoZ's Most Popular Posts in recent years

Search2

Hasbys!

Elder of Ziyon - حـكـيـم صـهـيـون



This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For 20 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.

Donate!

Donate to fight for Israel!

Monthly subscription:
Payment options


One time donation:

Follow EoZ on Twitter!

Interesting Blogs

Blog Archive