Wednesday, July 24, 2024
- Wednesday, July 24, 2024
- Elder of Ziyon
Seth Mandel: The Olympian Self-Deception of Anti-Zionists
Mohamed Hadid tends to explain away his racism and anti-Semitism as the anger and passion of a Palestinian still seeking vengeance for Israel’s victory in 1948. But one aspect of Hadid’s back story is illuminating here. He was born in 1948 in Nazareth, which a few months earlier had gone from British to Israeli stewardship. In the Hadid family’s own telling, his father then took the family to Syria because he refused “to live under the Israeli occupation.”Melanie Phillips: Britain’s UNRWA disgrace
As Hadid’s careful choice of words hints, Nazareth was not cleared of its Arab population by Israeli troops. Today it is a mostly Arab town of nearly 80,000. According to Hadid, his relatives remained there after the war. The “occupation” Hadid speaks of, then, is actually just Israeli sovereignty. This is helpful to know, because to Hadid all of Israel is illegitimate, as is Jewish self-determination. If the problem is Israel’s existence, what’s the solution?
In fact, the “Nazareth problem”—by which I mean the increasingly popular belief that Israel and Palestine both exist simultaneously, and one can go back and forth between these two planes of reality—has become a major obstacle preventing coexistence. The Nazareth problem is, in its own way, a solution. It just happens to be a solution that erases Jewish self-determination.
According to this mindset, the battle for Palestine rages until the Jews are defeated, and therefore Israel exists only as a figment of Jewish imagination. Thus we have the trend of media describing all Israeli Arabs as “Palestinians in Israel” or “Palestinian Israelis,” the latter a particularly nonsensical formulation for Arabs who have only ever lived in the state of Israel, to say nothing of Bedouin or Druze Arabs.
The more insidious version: ’48 Palestinians, or ’48 Arabs. You’ll find the term not just in Al Jazeera but in the Columbia Journalism Review and in the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal and Foreign Policy magazine. The logical next step—simply referring to Israel as ’48—follows closely behind. The point of such semantic acrobatics is to erase the term Israel from the lexicon.
And so it becomes utterly ridiculous to describe the Hadids and others like them as “critical of the Israeli government,” or some similar wording. This war is between Israel and Hamas, and Hamas isn’t fighting for the Galilee; it’s fighting for Tehran. The Arabs in Nazareth vote in Israeli elections. They are not under occupation, they are citizens of a state—no matter how much anti-Zionist influencers wish they weren’t.
In response to the discovery of the 12 UNWRA pogromists, 18 top donor states to UNRWA suspended their funding. After Israel provided the agency with information alleging that several of its employees had participated in the Hamas pogrom, UNRWA’s Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini fired them.‘Poisonous Tree’: There are alternatives to UNRWA
In February the UN Secretary-General, Antonio Guterres, responded to the revelations by announcing the appointment of an “independent review” into UNRWA by Catherine Colonna, the former French Minister of Foreign Affairs.
This, though, was a fix. UN Watch detailed Colonna’s conflicts of interest and bias in favour of UNRWRA; it pointed out that her aim was not to get to the bottom of the allegations but, in her own words, to “enable donors, the largest among them, but in fact everyone, to regain confidence, when they have lost it or when they have doubts, in the way UNRWA operates”.
In other words, this was a cynical snow job. Nevertheless, when UNRWA opened its latest fundraising campaign at the United Nations in New York, delegates from around the world signed a proclamation that the agency’s work was “indispensable” for Gaza, and many countries undertook to provide hundreds of millions more in funding. Now Britain has followed suit.
This morning’s Times of London (£) carries an article by Neta Heiman Mina — a member of Israel’s “peace movement” — whose 84 year-old mother, Ditza, was kidnapped from her home in Kibbutz Nir Oz during the October 7 pogrom and taken into Gaza. After she was released in the last hostage deal, Ditza revealed that her Hamas abductors had handed her over to a middle-aged Gaza resident called Abed. Mina writes:
Abed had kept my mother locked in a dark room of his home, with little food and no access to medication for almost two months. He told my mother that he was a teacher at a school run by UNRWA (the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine refugees)…
It emerged that my mother was not the only hostage who had been kidnapped or held captive by UNRWA employees, but the ties between UNRWA and Hamas go much deeper than kidnappings alone…
Beyond the weapons, rocket launchers, tunnels, dead hostages and server farms found in and underneath their facilities, and octogenarians held captive by their employees, UNRWA has been funnelling significant sums of cash straight from donors to Hamas for years.
The money laundering works like this: UNRWA insists on distributing cash aid to Gazans in US dollars, a currency they have to convert to shekels in order to use locally. In the West Bank, Jordan and other countries, UNRWA distributes cash aid in the local currency. Hamas, controlling the only licensed money changers in Gaza, charges Gazans a 10 to 20 per cent commission to convert their dollars to shekels. For more than a decade, over a billion dollars in cash from donations has been diverted into Hamas’s coffers.
In New York, diplomats and world leaders like Secretary General António Guterres only decried the delegitimisation of UNRWA as a partner to Hamas, and urged further donations with no end in sight. There was no attempt to counter the money laundering. No path to countering Hamas’s systematic desecration of UNRWA’s neutrality. No resolution to have UNRWA work to promote a sustainable peace between Palestinians and Israelis. By funding UNRWA as it is, we will only meet the same problems in the next generation.
At the start of the next school year, Abed will go back to teaching in his UNRWA classroom while Hamas restocks its storage cupboards with guns. Printed with the UN seal, the textbooks he will teach from contain tasks like writing out the sentence “I will nourish the homeland with my blood”, and learning early mathematics by counting martyrs from past wars.
IMPACT-se, the Israeli Institute for Monitoring Peace and Cultural Tolerance in School Education, the only NGO invited twice to testify before the U.N. panel investigating UNRWA, recently presented evidence on UNRWA’s education program to chair Catherine Colonna and the Danish Institute for Human Rights.
Following the testimony, Colonna reached out to IMPACT-se requesting further information, and IMPACT-se provided a 245-page dossier on hate teaching and antisemitism in UNRWA schools and educational materials.
Despite this, the final report ignored the extensive dossier, which analyzed thousands of pages of teaching materials, showing institutionally created violent and antisemitic teaching materials self-produced by UNRWA’s education departments and bearing the agency’s logo, and including the names of schools and lists of contributing UNRWA administrative staff. These include school principals, educational experts and content supervisors involved in drafting, supervising, approving, printing and distributing hateful content to students.
Examples presented to the review panel include material celebrating a Palestinian firebombing of a Jewish bus as a “barbecue party”; glorifying as a role model Dalal Mughrabi, responsible for murdering 38 Israeli civilians; and maps displayed in UNRWA classrooms that erase the existence of Israel and mark cities in pre-1967 Israel as Palestinian.
IMPACT-se also shared a November 2023 report which documents links between UNRWA’s education program and the Oct. 7 attacks by Hamas.
The report uncovers over 100 UNRWA graduates who are Hamas members responsible for murdering Israeli civilians, and evidence of links between textbooks teaching violent content in UNRWA schools and the Oct. 7 massacre.
It also reveals UNRWA school events celebrating the massacre, and UNRWA teachers and staff applauding the attack on social media.
But despite the evidence provided by IMPACT-se, the U.N. panel’s report described the existence of hate teaching as “marginal” and as a “small fraction.”
The report described UNRWA’s education policies that allegedly mitigate hate as “robust and fit for purpose,” and claimed UNRWA had initiated a range of initiatives to ensure the neutrality of its teaching material.
“No evidence was cited to demonstrate that this is the case,” according to IMPACT-se.
The problem of replacing UNRWA is not as simple as it sounds, and the United Nations itself will never agree to do so. Dismantling UNRWA or changing its mandate requires a vote at the UNGA, which is unlikely.
According to May, “the key to replacing UNRWA is drying up its funding.”
“UNRWA can functionally be dismantled by severing its money supply,” added May. “Dismantling UNRWA is part of a process of ridding the United Nations of its systematic anti-Israel bias.”
Michael Oren: Netanyahu’s Visit Is a Test for the Democrats
While many Americans would be hard-pressed to name the prime minister of Great Britain or the president of France, a very large number can identify—despise or admire—Netanyahu. His arrival in the United States, even in the midst of political chaos, will certainly be noted and his messages widely received.Seth Mandel: The Humiliating Cowardice of Schumer and Nadler
In an address to a joint session of Congress (his fourth, breaking Churchill’s record), Netanyahu will certainly recall the horrors of October 7, along with the hostages’ continuing nightmare. He will describe northern Israel as a war zone rendered uninhabitable by Hezbollah. Most fervidly, the prime minister will return to his favorite theme: Iran. The world’s leading enabler of terror, he’ll say, Iran bears direct responsibility for the devastation of the past ten months. The same threshold-capable Iran, he’ll proclaim, is today only a decision away from producing nuclear weapons.
The speech, delivered in the shadow of Biden’s first public appearance since exiting the presidential race, might not attract the attention it might otherwise have garnered. But far greater attention will be focused on his three high-profile meetings—each for a different reason.
Sitting before the cameras with Netanyahu, Biden will have the opportunity to prove that he is still competent enough to complete his term. He can rebuff those calling on him to resign and allow Kamala Harris to run as an incumbent.
Should he receive Netanyahu, as planned, at Mar-a-Lago, Trump can smooth over his differences with him and reinforce the Republicans’ claim to be the true pro-Israel party.
Netanyahu’s most impactful meeting, though, will be with Harris. It will showcase her as a statesperson capable of interacting with a formidable foreign leader. It will facilitate her necessary movement from the progressive left to the moderate center. Ironically, one of Netanyahu’s most outspoken critics in Washington stands to benefit substantially from his visit.
The New York Times was wrong and so, too, was the State Department’s Office of the Chief of Protocol, which apparently failed to give Netanyahu a respectable welcome. No matter. His time in Washington will be nevertheless noteworthy and perhaps even fateful.
There are three things happening here, all of them deeply destructive. The first has nothing to do with the Jewish angle of this debacle. That is the diplomatic malpractice. America has a serious amount of power and lately an unserious way of wielding it.Kamala Harris puts the ‘lie’ in allies when it comes to supporting Israel
Set aside the hysterical tone of Nadler’s post. Does anyone in Congress talk about any other ally this way? We have had a series of incompetent prime ministers in Britain over the past few years, one of whose term was outlived by a head of lettuce. We did not have members of Congress ranting about how Liz Truss was her country’s worst leader since Britain was Roman. That’s because they would look completely insane even publicly contemplating the question. If Nadler wants to retire to become a blogger at The Nation, he is more than welcome to. It’s a low bar, but more is expected of members of the United States Congress, especially those in senior positions.
Or we can turn to Canada, where the remedial-class prime minister likes to play dress-up more than think about politics, like some kind of ancient child-king. Is Schumer out on the floor ranting about how he loves Tim Hortons but the coffee will taste bitter to him until Justin Trudeau resigns to join the Ontario community theater?
The second and third problems here are related. The Democratic Party has made Israel so toxic that it is no longer possible to console ourselves with the fact that the overt anti-Semites are very few in number. Power is what matters, and Democratic floor leaders are terrified of the few but apparently scary bigmouths in the Squad and the legions of social media trolls they command. This, despite one Squad member losing his primary last month and another in danger of meeting the same fate next month. You don’t have to join them, you can just beat them.
Relatedly, it matters that Nadler and Schumer are high-profile Jews. Every time they dare to say anything nice about Israel or the Jewish people, they now caveat it to hell and back. The incentives are materially worsened by doing so, because those with even less power know they’ll be hung out to dry by leadership if and when they show a smidgen of Jewish pride.
Whatever Harris’ reason for missing the event, her record is full of harsh condemnation of Netanyahu’s prosecution of the war in Gaza.
Although Biden has run hot and cold in his support of Israel since the Oct. 7 terror attack by Hamas, Harris has been consistently critical.
As early as December, she said our ally “needed to do more” to protect Gaza civilians, saying in a Dubai speech: “The United States is unequivocal; international humanitarian law must be respected. Too many innocent Palestinians have been killed.”
Although she also said Israel had a right to defend itself, her remarks were widely regarded as coming close to accusing Israel of war crimes.
In March, she again went further than the White House by demanding an “immediate cease-fire.”
According to USA Today, she called the situation a “catastrophe” and claimed that “people in Gaza are starving.”
That is a false claim repeated endlessly by pro-Palestinian activists and Jew-haters at the United Nations.
The real problem in Gaza is that Hamas uses non-combatants as human shields and steals most of the international aid meant for civilians.
Oddly, Harris leveled that scurrilous attack in March while attending the 59th anniversary of Bloody Sunday in Selma, where Alabama troopers clubbed peaceful civil rights marchers as they tried to cross the Edmund Pettus Bridge.
The place and timing of her comments suggested she saw a similarity between Jim Crow racism and the absurd claims that Palestinians are victims of Israeli apartheid.
Indeed, her comments consistently echo those from the Dems’ far left wing, which is dominated by harsh criticism of Israel and, often, blatant antisemitism.
It’s not a coincidence that the most virulent anti-Israel protests on college campuses took place in elite institutions dominated by leftists.
The White House was mostly silent, and it was only because of tough questioning by House Republicans, notably Elise Stefanik from upstate New York, that we learned of the cowardly excuses the presidents at Harvard and the University of Pennsylvania used to duck their responsibility to protect Jewish students from threats and harassment.
- Wednesday, July 24, 2024
- Varda Meyers Epstein (Judean Rose)
- 07Oct23, 2023-24 Gaza, Joe Biden, Judean Rose, Opinion, Varda
Disclaimer: the views expressed here are solely those of
the author, weekly Judean Rose columnist Varda Meyers Epstein.
When Bibi Netanyahu and his wife Sara got off the plane in
DC, there were no dignitaries on hand to greet them. No president,
and no vice president. The president was ill with COVID and far away, while
Vice President Kamala Harris was, well, missing. Period.
Bibi gets mediocre greeting https://t.co/7wVRdQJkfl pic.twitter.com/TodtG4BD3O
— Open Source Intel (@Osint613) July 22, 2024
There can be no doubt that with her absence, Harris was signaling her contempt and disrespect for the Jewish State. We know this because the vice president let it further be known that she would not be attending Netanyahu’s address to Congress—which is actually her job. "Vice President Kamala Harris, who is now the presumptive Democratic nominee, will not preside in her constitutional role as president of the Senate during Netanyahu’s address," wrote CNN.
Harris begged off with prior engagements. But the marked absence of the presumptive Democrat presidential nominee at the airport and the historic address to Congress wasn’t really about a speaking gig at a sorority in Indianapolis, and even Israel’s war on Hamas was only an excuse.The Vice President is supposed to preside over joint sessions of Congress. @KamalaHarris refusal to do so when the Prime Minister of Israel makes his first public address in the United States since Hamas invaded Israel on October 7, tells you everything you need to know about…
— David M Friedman (@DavidM_Friedman) July 23, 2024
The reason Kamala Harris has been MIA on all things
Netanyahu is because she doesn’t like Israel. She would say she doesn’t hate Israel; she
hates only Netanyahu. But “Netanyahu” is to “Israel” as “Zionist” is to “Jew.”
One is only a code word for the other, a code that renders hatred kosher, via an
adjustment in terminology.
The code makes it possible to read between the lines of what
Kamala Harris has said about Israel over the years, and also how she has
responded to Israel’s detractors, offering sympathy to Jew-haters for their “truth.”
WATCH: Kamala Harris nods as student accuses Israel of "ethnic genocide": “your truth cannot be suppressed" pic.twitter.com/FcqCyT7Uo8
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) September 28, 2021
Over time, Kamala Harris has become ever bolder in expressing her anti-Israel sentiments. Or maybe she was always this way. She told a man accusing Israel and the US of genocide that she appreciated his leadership.
Kamala Harris sits in silence as an audience member peddles Hamas propaganda and baselessly accuses Israel and the U.S. of "genocide."
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) October 17, 2023
Then she praises him: "I appreciate you raising the subject and I appreciate your leadership."
FULL EXCHANGE: pic.twitter.com/6gKMjWqspA
In March she expressed her sympathy for antisemitic protesters.
Harris said she understood how they felt (emphasis added):
“They are showing exactly what the human emotion should
be, as a response to Gaza. There are things some of the protesters are
saying that I absolutely reject, so I don’t mean to wholesale endorse their
points. But we have to navigate it. I understand the emotion behind it.”
In that same March interview, Harris issued a stark warning
to the Jewish State. “We have been clear in multiple conversations and in every
way that any major military operation in Rafah would be a huge mistake,” said Harris
on ABC’s “This Week.”
“I have studied the maps. There’s nowhere for those folks to
go,” said Harris, referring to the residents of Rafah.
This, of course, is a lie. The residents of Rafah do have a
place to go, in fact multiple places to go. They could go to the humanitarian
zones created for them by Israel, but Hamas won’t let them leave. They could go
to Egypt, but Egypt
won’t let them in. No one should believe that Kamala Harris does not know these
things. She has been briefed on and sat in briefings about these things.
She knows about Hamas blocking the way of fleeing civilians,
sometimes by beating and killing them. She also knows that Egypt has refused to
take in the desperate Gazans. In spite of this knowledge, during the course of
the interview, Harris went further even than Biden’s “Don’t.”
“We’re gonna take it one step at a time,” said Kamala
Harris, alluding to what the Jewish State should expect should it fail to heed
Biden’s warning. Shipments of weapons and ammunition would be “delayed.”
This, in fact, was what happened. A loophole was found and
exploited by the Biden administration in order to withhold arms from the Jewish
State. Senator Tom Cotton described how they did it in a June
24 letter to Joe Biden. It was now three months since Kamala had made her
threat, and the weapons, so crucial to the Jewish State, had not been released:
“Your administration is engaged in bureaucratic
sleight-of-hand to withhold this crucial aid to Israel during a shooting war.
As you are aware, the Arms Export Control Act requires the administration to
notify Congress before sending weapons to a foreign country. Your
administration has manipulated this requirement by withholding this formal
notification to Congress of approved weapons sales, including F-15s, tactical
vehicles, 120-mm mortars, 120-mm tank rounds, joint direct attack munitions,
and small diameter bombs. Your administration can then claim that the weapons
are ‘in process’ while never delivering them.”
The confluence of world events right now is intriguing. It
puts one in mind of the Book of Esther. Biden steps down from his bid for
reelection and Harris assumes the role, just as Netanyahu arrives to plead his
case. Can we predict how the story arc will play out? What will happen to Israel
in the months to come, as a heavily-funded Kamala Harris veers ever more
publicly further to the left?
Here is what will happen: Israel will refuse to stand down
against the vicious Hamas terrorists, no matter what Kamala Harris does or
doesn’t do. But should she continue to amass power, her distaste for Israel,
may end up hurting the very people she means to help. Because the longer this
drags on, the more Gazans will die.
The Biden administration has not advocated for US citizens held hostage in Gaza, and has fed money to Iran and its proxy, Hamas, all the while demonizing Israel. But when it comes to sheer public hatred of the Jewish State, Kamala somehow always takes it that one step further than Biden, letting the world know she’s not going to give the Jews of Israel the means to defend themselves.
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon! Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. Read all about it here! |
|
- Wednesday, July 24, 2024
- Elder of Ziyon
In Thrace it is absolutely necessary and of crucial importance for Turkish life, the Turkish economy, Turkish security, the Turkish regime and the revolution to abolish Jewry, which represents a hidden danger for us and wants to lay the groundwork for communism in our country, in collaboration with labour organizations, in the most radical manner.....It is urgently required that a careful solution is found to the Jewish problem, which only puts the Turks in harm’s way in all areas of life in Thrace."
- Wednesday, July 24, 2024
- Elder of Ziyon
- Forest Rain
By Forest Rain
Beautiful, beloved Amit Man – words are not enough
Words are tools that describe and create reality. Powerful
yet only representations, a reflection, not the experience itself. There is a
gap between the two which usually goes unnoticed. But when the experience is
profound the gap becomes sharp and painful. The words fall broken and twisted
into the chasm that they cannot bridge.
What words could encompass the whirlwind of evil that swept
through this little building, snatching lives away and laughing the whole time?
The dental clinic in Be’eri was designated as a gathering
place in an emergency. It was not equipped for the disaster that hit the
community on October 7th. Who could imagine a full-scale invasion of
monsters armed to the teeth and eager to rape and burn families alive?
It was here that the Children of Light fought the Children
of Darkness.
What words have enough truth in them, enough depth, to
describe what happened in this little clinic? What words have enough light in
them to describe Amit Man, beautiful and beloved, dedicated to life, choosing
others above herself when the missiles began? She could have left the kibbutz.
She could have stayed in the safe room. Instead, she took her paramedic’s bag
and ran to the clinic. What words are enough to describe Dr. Daniel Levi, Amit, and a nurse battling for
seven hours to treat the injured and save lives? What words are powerful enough
to honor the two members of the kibbutz's emergency response team who stood
guard, fighting off the monsters so that the healers could treat the injured?
Seven hours, an
eternity in hell.
Throughout the battle
Amit, just 22 years old, kept her composure and constantly updated the Magen
David Adom (MDA) headquarters about the condition of the wounded, pleading for evacuation.
When the medical supplies ran out, she caressed the heads of the injured, gave
them water, and encouraged them. Two of the survivors recounted that the
assistance she provided saved their lives.
Around 2:00 PM the brave
men battling to protect the clinic ran out of ammunition.
Amit managed to send a
message to her family: "I don't think I will get out of here. Please stay
strong if something happens to me."
“They’re here.”
Three little words. So
much, unspeakable horror.
In her last call to her family Amit can be heard screaming “Shachar” the name
of one of the men trying to protect her. Did she scream because she had already
been shot in the leg or was it because she was watching his life run out of his
body and she couldn’t help?
When Amit was found
they saw she had been shot in the leg, managed to apply a tourniquet to
herself, but was shot again and died.
There are no words profound enough to convey what it is like
to stand in the place where evil swept through, snatching lives away and
laughing.
The walls, riddled with bullet holes, are silent yet
accusatory. Here the Children of Light shone in all their glory. Here their
sacrifice, love, dedication, honor, and dignity were not enough to stop the
evil, ravenous and hellbent on stamping out life.
People whose loved ones were ripped from them here wrote on
the walls, words doomed to fail in conveying the depths of their emotions.
The flatness of the words knocked the breath from my lungs. I
saw words that attempted to infuse dignity and respect in a place where dignity
was stolen. I saw words that attempted to express love and honor. And then one little word jumped out at me:
“Mom”.
Amit Man’s sister Haviva and mother wrote these words on the
wall, in between the bullet holes:
In memory of Amit
Man, our little sister,
the beloved of our hearts who was murdered while saving lives,
together with Dr. Daniel Levi,
Shachar Tzemach,
and Eitan Hadad.
We love you forever and ever.
Mom !
Haviva
As time passes and others forget, we are left to pick up the
debris left by the storm.
October 7th isn’t over.
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon! Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. Read all about it here! |
|
- Wednesday, July 24, 2024
- Elder of Ziyon
- Wednesday, July 24, 2024
- Elder of Ziyon
The Beijing declaration calls for a Palestinian state based on borders that were in place before Israel captured the West Bank, the Gaza Strip and east Jerusalem in a 1967 war.What borders?
Tuesday, July 23, 2024
Hamas and Genocide in Israel
"Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such..." — Definition of genocide, The United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, December 9, 1948.My Son Was the First American Killed by Hamas
Their genocidal aim, clear to the Hamas terrorists, was to murder Jews; others, such as Asians and Muslims, were also murdered. What is illuminating is how easily the civilized world, in this instance, accepted that as well as the abduction of 250 hostages. Those who slaughter and take hostages should be the subject of disgrace and condemnation. Instead, frequently, they were celebrated.
Israel, of necessity, responded to this massacre. Israel's goals, according to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, called by Andrew Roberts "the Churchill of the Middle East," are "returning hostages from Gaza, eliminating Hamas' military and governing capabilities, ensuring that Gaza will not constitute a threat against Israel and also returning displaced Israeli residents securely to their homes in both the south and the north." Israel's goal is not to destroy the Palestinians, Arabs or Gazan civilians.
The situation of displaced Gazans -- temporary evacuations are allowed by Geneva IV, Article 49 -- is certainly unfortunate; however, the main problem is the aggressive nature of Iran's and Hamas's totalitarian regimes. That is what has led to the October 7 massacre and is the seminal reason for the war and the Gazan casualties.
"Israel Implemented More Measures to Prevent Civilian Casualties Than Any Other Nation in History"; "Israel Has Created a New Standard for Urban Warfare: Why Will No One Admit it?" — John Spencer, chair of urban warfare studies at the Modern War Institute at West Point; Newsweek, January 31, 2024, and March 25, 2024.
It is, in fact, Iran and Hamas that should be on trial for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
"Hamas is a religious movement, and they are a raging religious movement against Israel. The mainstream media cannot say this because they are afraid to ignite a religious war. And what I say, it already is. They want to annihilate the Jewish people because they are Jewish people, because they are a Jewish state." — Mosab Hassan Yousef, son of Hamas co-founder Sheikh Hassan Yousef, Fox News, October 23, 2023.
The recent news that a group called American Muslims for Palestine was ordered by a Virginia court to provide financial documentation to state Attorney General Jason Miyares as part of an investigation into the group’s funding sources and allegations it may have used funds for “benefitting or providing support to terrorist organizations,” was another reminder of the need to shut down Hamas and its terror tentacles worldwide. But to me, the news hit particularly hard, because my son David Boim was the first American citizen killed by Hamas.The Lancet’s anti-Israel pseudoscience
It was Monday, May 13 of 1996, and David was 17. Although he was born in New York, he was studying at a yeshiva in Israel, and, that fateful morning, he was standing at a bus stop with his friends, chatting happily as he waited for his ride back home to Jerusalem.
Tragically, Amjad Hinawi and Khalil Tawfiq Al-Sharif had other, evil plans. The two Hamas terrorists contemplated an attack on a nearby military base, but the sight of soldiers with guns made them lose heart. Better, they reasoned, to seek out more vulnerable targets. Driving around, they first shot at a bus, wounding two passengers. Then, they spotted the kids at the bus stop and opened fire.
David’s friend Yair Greenbaum was shot in the chest and later recovered. David wasn’t so lucky: He was struck in the head and was pronounced dead within the hour. Hinawi and Al-Sharif fled to the Palestinian Authority and remained committed to murder and terrorism. A year after he had murdered my son, Al-Sharif blew himself up on Jerusalem’s Ben Yehuda street, killing five and wounding 192 Israelis.
The same newspapers that minimized our suffering as understandable collateral damage today continue to draw false equivalences. The same so-called defenders of human rights extend sympathy to everyone but Jews.
Over the years since David was murdered, I have visited his grave hundreds of times. I told him about the lawsuit his father and I filed against American organizations we believed were fundraising fronts for Hamas. I shared with him the good news when we won that lawsuit in 2004 and were awarded a $156 million judgment. And I wept for him as the same organizations found guilty of providing material support to the terrorists quickly disbanded rather than comply with the court’s ruling. Then I was told that many of the same terrorism supporters went on to play very similar roles in very similar organizations, only with different names.
I’m not a lawyer and not a legal expert, but I know a mockery of justice when I see one, which is why my husband and I decided to file another lawsuit and insist that justice prevail.
But it’s not the legal proceedings I’ve been thinking about since Oct. 7. It’s not even hearing that some of the very same people who provided support to my son’s killers are now training young college students, not much older than David was when he was murdered, to once again hate and assault Jews. Rather, it’s that so little seems to have changed since my son was shot for no other reason than being Jewish. The same terrorists who helped plan my son’s execution are now overseeing the murder and kidnapping of other young Jews. The same newspapers that, back then, minimized our suffering as understandable collateral in a complicated conflict continue to draw false equivalences and refuse to condemn the murderers for what they are. The same so-called defenders of human rights and dignity seem to extend sympathy to all but the targeted Jews.
You’d think that all this causes me nothing but anguish. But that’s not the case.
When I lost David, I swore to myself that his death shall not be in vain. That even though I cannot bring him back to me, hold him once more in my arms, tell him again how proud I am of him and how much I love him, I can—and will—not only hold the perpetrators and their helpers accountable, but also continue to warn the world about what happens when we let evil men do evil things without standing up for what’s right.
And the horrors of Oct. 7 reminded me that my work here is far from done.
The eye-catching nature of the 186,000 figure, as well as the fact it was published in such a well-respected medical journal, has turned it into international news. It has been seized on by pro-Palestine campaigners. It was spray-painted by vandals on the ground by the Cenotaph in London last week, and has been quoted as fact by a Labour MP.
Some might try to argue that these outlandish figures are in no way being endorsed by the Lancet, as they were published in a letter and not a peer-reviewed article. But this is tosh. Peer-reviewed articles naturally carry more weight because they are more carefully scrutinised by outside reviewers. However, letters to the editor are not published at random. They are not akin to below-the-line comments on a website. They must be approved by an in-house editor and the vast majority are rejected. Approval and subsequent publication confers the imprimatur of a prestigious medical journal, whether the editorial staff publicly agrees with the letter or not. The fact that this was published at all carries some kind of implication.
Nor was this incident a one-off for the Lancet. The journal was previously involved with a different type of well-publicised scientific innumeracy during the Iraq War in the 2000s. In 2006, it published a study claiming that there had been 655,000 excess deaths in three years of war. This would have meant 500 deaths daily or 2.5 per cent of the Iraqi population. This surely could not have gone unnoticed by the authorities or journalists present, none of whom reported such daily carnage at the time. More recent analyses suggest the mortality figures were considerably lower than those published in the Lancet. The study, well-quoted by the anti-war community at the time, has been discredited by many sources.
The Iraq War study and the Gaza letter are examples of agenda-driven scientific reporting. Sadly, this phenomenon is not restricted to the Lancet. Respected American medical journals such as the New England Journal of Medicine and the Journal of the American Medical Association have abandoned objectivity in numerous editorials, letters to the editor and scientific reports. A recent study that examined content from Nature, Science and Scientific American – three of the world’s top scientific journals – found a growing number of political articles published at the expense of scientific ones.
The Lancet’s nakedly partisan Gaza letter cannot be unseen. It is the latest example of an insidious trend in medical journals of abandoning their role as neutral reporters, while simultaneously using science to advance political causes. This pernicious drift into politics will do immeasurable long-term damage to the scientific world – and to the public seeking its guidance.
Seth Mandel: A Turning Point in the U.S.-Iran Shadow War?
The most important metric here is deterrence. If the response hasn’t altered the Houthis’ ability to threaten the sea lanes, then the overall number of missiles we’ve blown up doesn’t matter much. Kurilla seems to speak for a not-insignificant part of the defense establishment that would like permission to, as the Journal puts it, “carry out a broader range of strikes.”Jake Wallis Simons: Israel is about to discover how revolting the Democratic Left have become
“If you tell the military to re-establish freedom of navigation and then you tell them to only be defensive, it isn’t going to work,” one U.S. official told the paper. “It is all about protecting ships without affecting the root cause.”
Meanwhile, Vladimir Putin is flirting with providing the Houthis with antiship cruise missiles, which would certainly make U.S. officials wish the conflict had been solved already. In fact, Russia is leveling that threat as a direct response to U.S. support for Ukraine, more proof that the conflicts cannot be compartmentalized and treated as if in a vacuum. As if to reinforce the point, on Tuesday a Ukrainian security team guarding a cargo ship in the Red Sea appears to have destroyed a Houthi naval drone fired at their vessel.
Behind the Houthis stands Tehran, behind which stands Moscow, behind which stands Beijing. American strategists may not like it, but they cannot pretend otherwise anymore.
That is especially true because the U.S. consulate in Tel Aviv was nearly hit by the Houthi drone and may very well have been its target.
In its response, Israel did not seek to be polite. The strike had to be real. And it had to be attention-getting, because the Houthis do not ultimately act independently. So the air force struck the port of Hodeidah, which is controlled by the Houthis and used as a transit point for Iranian weapons. The strike did extensive damage to the port’s oil storage facilities and halted all ship traffic for a couple of days.
“The Houthis attacked us over 200 times,” Defense Minister Yoav Gallant said. “The first time that they harmed an Israeli citizen, we struck them. And we will do this in any place where it may be required. The blood of Israeli citizens has a price.”
Yet the Tel Aviv attack was also an escalation, a finger in the eye of the U.S. defense establishment, which has been failing to deter the Houthis for months. The fact that the Houthis—and thus, the Iranians—may have targeted the U.S. consulate is not just dangerous but deeply insulting: The Houthis could not possibly be less afraid of the American superpower.
U.S. presidents have long justified their aversion to taking strong retaliatory measures by dismissing the terrorist target as unworthy of the effort and posing no real threat to the United States. But this is Iran shooting at our consulate, and it is Russia threatening to give them advanced antiship missiles. Time to get real.
It is commonly accepted that the reason Biden has been blowing hot and cold on Israel as the November election approached was to placate the progressive wing of his party. With Michigan, a key swing state, home to the largest community of Arab-Americans in the country, and with Rashida Tlaib representing it, the electoral pressure was on.UNRWA is only indispensable to Hamas, not ordinary Palestinians
The Democrats were disunified and morose, while the Republicans looked ever more energised. Hence Biden delaying shipments of arms to the Jewish state. Hence Biden talking of the IDF going “over the top” with “indiscriminate bombing”, despite the fact that his own administration was sending precision munitions to Israel, explicitly to enable the IDF to limit civilian casualties.
With Harris in the White House, the Squad and their fellow travellers will be pushing at a far easier door. Yesterday, the co-leader of Britain’s Green Party, Carla Denyer, was forced to apologise after she praised Biden, triggering a backlash from the Israelophobic grassroots of her party.
Owen Jones, who has apparently become even more profoundly unhinged since October 7, appointed himself their mouthpiece, ranting on Twitter about how Biden had “armed and facilitated the mass slaughter of innocent people”. It didn’t take long for Denyer to cave to the pressure, bleating that she apologised if her supporters felt she was “offering my unmitigated support for his Presidency”, particularly selling arms to the Middle East’s only democracy as it fights for its life against the forces of jihadism.
Let the Greens be a cautionary tale. A second Trump term threatens to undermine America’s democratic institutions and usher in an era of isolationism, not least on Ukraine. A Harris administration may embolden the new radicalism that increasingly dominates her party and unleash it even more violently across the United States.
For those of us who care about global stability, principled and pragmatic foreign policy and the future of America, the Biden years – for all their significant failures – may come to look like a golden age.
A just approach to rebuilding Gaza would be to give Palestinians the agency to solve their own problems. Despite the insistence in the declarations, UNRWA is only indispensable to Hamas. Beyond the weapons, rocket launchers, tunnels, dead hostages and server farms found in and underneath their facilities, and octogenarians held captive by their employees, UNRWA has been funnelling significant sums of cash straight from donors to Hamas for years.
The money laundering works like this: UNRWA insists on distributing cash aid to Gazans in US dollars, a currency they have to convert to shekels in order to use locally. In the West Bank, Jordan and other countries, UNRWA distributes cash aid in the local currency. Hamas, controlling the only licensed money changers in Gaza, charges Gazans a 10 to 20 per cent commission to convert their dollars to shekels. For more than a decade, over a billion dollars in cash from donations has been diverted into Hamas’s coffers.
In New York, diplomats and world leaders like Secretary General António Guterres only decried the delegitimisation of UNRWA as a partner to Hamas, and urged further donations with no end in sight. There was no attempt to counter the money laundering. No path to countering Hamas’s systematic desecration of UNRWA’s neutrality. No resolution to have UNRWA work to promote a sustainable peace between Palestinians and Israelis. By funding UNRWA as it is, we will only meet the same problems in the next generation.
At the start of the next school year, Abed will go back to teaching in his UNRWA classroom while Hamas restocks its storage cupboards with guns. Printed with the UN seal, the textbooks he will teach from contain tasks like writing out the sentence “I will nourish the homeland with my blood”, and learning early mathematics by counting martyrs from past wars.