You might not remember the debate about whether the road to Middle East peace ran through Jerusalem or Baghdad. In the early 1990s, U.S. Secretary of State James Baker believed that peace between Israel and Palestine was the key to solving the main problems of the Middle East. During the second Bush administration, a reverse suggestion was made — and debated: that solving the problem of Baghad would hasten a peace between Israel and the Palestinians. Time proved both theories wrong, or at least premature. Peace was not achieved, and the Middle East still has problems. Very few people still believe in a so-called “linkage.”
Of course, peace with the Palestinians has merit, but avoiding the linkage between achieving that goal and pursuing other Middle East advances removes some of the pressures on the Israeli-Palestinian issue. The Palestinians cannot hold all other Middle East advances hostage until their issue is resolved. The world no longer lives under the illusion that Israel-Palestine peace is the first priority (more important than, say, Iranian nuclear advances). Israel is no longer blamed — at least not by serious people — for causing trouble in other areas in the region.
With that linkage basically put aside, Israel is now aiming for the jugular of the second linkage: whether it can be legitimized in the Arab Muslim world when its conflict with the Palestinians is still an open wound.
Egypt was the first country to erode this linkage when it signed a peace agreement with Israel (with provisions aimed at advancing a solution for the Palestinians). Jordan likewise signed a peace agreement with Israel in the early 1990s, when Israel and the Palestinians seemed for a while as if they were moving toward resolution.
The situation today is much changed. It is clear that Israelis and Palestinians are not moving toward peace. It is also clear that when Arab Muslim countries get closer to Israel that they are not doing it because of the Palestinian issue but rather in spite of it. They are doing it because they have other priorities — concerns about Iran; economic or technological needs Israel can satisfy; or political needs that can be addressed through Israel’s ties in Washington.
The message that Iran is sending to Palestinian families is: "If you want money and a good life, send your children to die on the border with Israel." This is a message that is likely to reverberate far and wide among Arabs, well beyond the Palestinians.
The declared goal of the Iranian-sponsored World Forum for Proximity of Islamic Schools of Thought is to forge unity between Muslims. For the Iranians and their proxies, Islamic unity is a prerequisite to advancing the ultimate goal of removing the "cancerous tumor" (Israel) from the face of the earth. Iran has been doing its utmost to achieve this goal.
Were it not for Iranian support, the Lebanese Shiite terrorist organization, Hezbollah, would not be aiming tens of thousands of rockets and missiles at Israel. Were it not for Iranian military and financial backing, Hamas, Islamic Jihad and other terrorist groups would not have been able to fire more than 500 projectiles at Israel in 24 hours, as they did last month.
To set the record straight: Iran cares nothing for the Palestinians; Iran seeks to obliterate Israel, and if it could, obliterate the US, as its expansion into South America suggests.
It seems that some mullahs in Iran cannot wait for Khamenei's prediction of Israel's destruction in 2040. The Iranian money promised to the families is meant to encourage other all Arabs and Muslims to send their children to launch rocket attacks on Israel and throw stones and firebombs at Israeli soldiers.
Every year, a giant Chanukah menorah is erected in the plaza of the Kotel, the Western Wall.
The official Palestinian Authority news agency, Wafa, describes it as "the introduction of the Jewish 'candelabra' into the heart of the blessed mosque."
It goes on:
The allegedtemple groups began their celebration of Hanukkah by erecting a huge candelabra in the Al-Buraq courtyard (the western wall of the Al-Aqsa Mosque) and calling for visits to the Al-Aqsa Mosque during the holiday. The so-called "Third Temple Institute" Under the pretext of performing Talmudic rituals and reconstruction it for the Jews.
This holiday is considered one of the most popular holidays in connection with the "alleged temple" and a danger to the Al-Aqsa Mosque in particular. The other festivals are not related to the Temple or the location directly, but this holiday is associated with an alleged purge of the Temple.
The supposed holiness of the Kotel to Muslims is a new phenomenon from the 19th century. The legend of Mohammed's flying steed does not say where he supposedly tethered the magical animal; early Muslim sources associated it with the southern wall of the Mount, and then later with the southwest corner, and only in the 19th century with the area of the Western Wall.
As with everything else in Israel, Muslims consider something holy only in relation with how sacred the Jews consider it.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
When does criticism of Israel cross the line into antisemitism?
Ask white supremacist leader David Duke, who freely admits he is antisemitic!
He is tweeting his love for leftist anti-Israel stories and personalities. And Duke's straight anti-Israel tweets would be perfectly at home on leftist anti-Israel sites.
Duke at least admits that it is antisemitism that animates his feelings about Israel. But when you can't distinguish his anti-Israel tweets from the tweets of those who pretend to be merely "anti-Zionist," and indeed when he says he agrees with the leftist anti-Zionists and uses their talking points about Israel, it is a strong indication that there is in reality no difference between the two.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
Al Ahram, one of the oldest newspapers in Egypt, is not happy about the series of reports CNN aired last week showing how much antisemitism there still in in Europe.
The article starts off by saying that CNN is attempting to create "emotional blackmail" to help Jews in the United States and Europe by showing this series.
Anecdotes about how Jews are targeted today are dismissed by Al Ahram as events that could happen to anyone, anywhere.
Why would an Arab news outlet be concerned about a report that says that Jews are still targeted in Europe, today?
One reason is that Egypt is still a deeply antisemitic country, and Jews being perceived as victims rather than as oppressors is a challenge to the hate that is taught implicitly and explicitly by the schools and the media.
The other is that a lot of antisemitic attacks against Jews in Europe comes from Muslims and Arabs, and that story must be dowbplayed or ridiculed.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
Indonesian rent-a-crowd 'protesters' were paid less than $3.50 each to attend a rally opposing any move by the Australian government of its Israeli embassy from Tel Aviv and Jerusalem.
About 250 people attended the rally on Friday, the fourth rally in the last five days, outside Australia's sprawling embassy compound in Kuningan, south Jakarta and which was organised by the Indonesian Muslim League, a little-known group.
Protesters, some of whom were paid to attend, sit around bored at a rally outside the Australian embassy in Jakarta.
Protesters, some of whom were paid to attend, sit around bored at a rally outside the Australian embassy in Jakarta.
But while some attending the protest appeared to be genuinely fired-up by the prospect of Australia shifting its embassy to Jerusalem, perhaps half the crowd appeared largely disinterested and showed little enthusiasm for the speaker imploring them to agree to "occupy" the embassy.
Fairfax Media confirmed with three of the 'protesters' hanging around on the fringes of the rally that many had been paid to attend.
Many members of the crowd looked bored, posed for selfies, played with their phones, hid in the shade away from the afternoon sun and appeared not be listening to the speakers at the rally.
The 'protesters' said they and at least 35 of their friends had been paid to come to the rally on Friday and express their 'opinion' - a practice that is common in Indonesia.
Professor Eugene Kontorovich, director of International Law at the Kohelet Policy Forum, said the Airbnb policy is discrimination.
"Airbnb's policy discriminates grossly against people of the Jewish faith and people of the Jewish ethnicity. They treat Jews living in the West Bank different[ly] from any other group," he said.
Kontorovich said that in Palestinian Authority-controlled areas, the PA punishes Palestinians who sell land to Jews with death.
"So if you have an area where Jews are not allowed to buy houses, Jews are not allowed to live and Airbnb says, 'there we have no problem listing.' You have the Jewish areas where anybody can come, anybody can go, there's free access and Airbnb says, 'you're not allowed to list'. So Jews living in their biblical homeland is the one group that Airbnb is keeping off their platform and that should be very disturbing," he said.
Kontorovich also noted that in the whole world, Airbnb chose to make its point here.
"There is indeed a political dispute about the West Bank, but they're not saying, 'we're not taking listings from the West Bank, they're saying, 'we're not taking listings from Jews in the West Bank. That's not just a double standard, that's naked discrimination," he said.
Last week I broke the story of how National Geographic said that the Oslo Accords were meant for Israel to "return" land to Palestinians, even though no Palestinian entity or people ever had control of that land to begin with. Honest Reporting contacted them and the story was corrected.
CAMERA contacted them and they issued a speedy correction:
Also last week I also reported on a bizarre conspiracy theory in a Canadian Arab newspaper involving Jewish Freemasons building the Titanic in order to kill three (Jewish) businessmen who were on its voyage because they were against the idea of the Federal Reserve, controlled by Jews. The editor of the paper that published this was running for office in Ottawa.
A Canadian journalist saw this and made a couple of calls to ensure that the editor would not be chosen to represent anyone:
Nice fast work by National Council @CPC_HQ. Medhat Oweida will *not* be the party's candidate in Mississauga Streetsville, no way, no how. Confirmed. pic.twitter.com/nvU0SmqFu4
Also, the article itself has been removed from the site (you can see it archived here.)
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
When challenged about the comment on Twitter, Hill responded to say that he believes in a "single secular democratic state for everyone." [At this point Newsweek has a tweet from Hill where he adds "This is the only way that historic Palestine will be free."] However, Hill's statement about a "historic Palestine" appears to be inaccurate as no Palestinian state has ever existed.
Newsweek was quite accurate.
"Historic Palestine" is a fiction of how modern Palestinians farcically refer to the area of the British Mandate, although it was never an independent state and its borders were drawn by Western powers. There is nothing historic about it.
Any map of Palestine prior to World War I includes parts of what became Jordan and Lebanon, and none of the Negev.
Marc Lamont Hill, by invoking "historic Palestine," is consciously choosing a false construct meant to completely overlap with the territory that modern Israel controlled in 1967. The very term "historic Palestine" has zero to do with Palestine or Palestinian land, and everything to do with taking away any rights of Jews to any land in the Middle East.
It is an antisemitic term.
Newsweek was right in saying that no Palestinian state never existed. Hill know this very well. He knows that he is consciously choosing the areas that Israel controls, and nothing else, when deciding that this is what the borders of "Palestine" should be - just like the 1964 PLO Covenant explicitly excluded the West Bank that was then controlled by Jordan as part of "Palestine."
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
Recently there was a conference in Istanbul for journalists to meet and to discuss how to push the Palestinian narrative in world media.
Not how to be objective.
No, every so-called "journalist" who attended the conference was there to figure out how to demonize Israel and make Palestinians look as sympathetic as possible to the world.
Every "journalist" who attended makes a conscious decision to violate all journalistic ethics and push an anti-Israel agenda. There was even a workshop on how to address Arab media that is not hateful enough towards Israel.
The forum published a list of the attendees. I highlighted the ones from Western countries and media outlets.
Aarfa Khanum (India) Senior Editor at Thewire.in
Abdallah Elbakkali (Morocco) Director of the National Syndicate of Morrocan Press
Abdallah Marouf (Palestine) Professor of Jerusalem Studies
Abdullah Abu Awad (Morocco) Academic Professor & Communications Expert
Abdullah Al-Saafin (Palestine) Media Trainer
Abdullah Almosawi (Kuwait) Researcher and Political Analyst
Abdullatif Najim (Palestine) Digital Media Expert - Tawasul
Adam Ali Adam (Chad) President of the Association of Arabic-Speaking Chadian Journalists
Adam Bensaid (Algeria) Deputy Producer at TRT World Digital
Adnan Abu Amer (Palestine) Expert in Israeli Affairs
Ahmad Hasan Al Zoubi (Jordan) Jordanian Journalist and Writer
Ahmad Hela (Palestine) Palestinian Media Consultant
Ahmed Al-Shaikh (Palestine) Veteran TV Journalist
Ajša Hafizovic Hadzimesic (Bosnia And Herzegovina) Editor at IIN Preporod Newspaper Alfredo Jalife Rahme (Mexico) Professor & Political Analyst
Ameen Izzadeen (Sri Lanka) Editor of Intl Desk at Wijeya Newspapers Group
Amer Lafi (jordan) Correspondent of Aljazeera - Istanbul
Angel Phiri (Zambia) Broadcaster at MUVI TV Zambia Angela Lano (Italy) Journalist & Editor of InfoPal Press Agency Antony Loewenstein (Australia) Australian Journalist, Author & Filmmaker
Anwar Abdelhadi Abu Taha (Palestine) Director General of Palestine TV today Anwar Farrán Veloso (Chile) Journalist & Filmmaker Ashraf Ali (India) Founder Editor of Asia Times Online
Asma Alhaj (Palestine) TV Presenter at TRT Arabic
Assaad Taha (Egypt) Documentary Filmmaker and Audio-Visual Expert
Ayman Gaballa (Egypt) Director of Aljazeera Mubasher TV
Ayman Zeidan (Palestine) Deputy Director-General of Al Quds International Institution
Azzam Al-Tamimi (Palestine) Director of Alhewar TV Channel Ben White (UK) British Journalist & Author Britt Hendrix (Netherlands) Human Rights Advocate Carmen Corda (Italy) Italian Journalist & Researcher
Catherine Dorcas Ageno (Uganda) News Producer at NTV Uganda Clare Short (UK) Former Secretary of State for Intl Development of UK
Dareen Abughaida (Palestine) Principal Presenter at Aljazeera English Daud Abdullah (UK) Director General of MEMO - UK Dorothea Ionescu (Romania) Journalist & Strategic Communications Consultant
Edison Mutumba (Kenya) Cinematographer & Drone Operator
Elijah Mwangi (Kenya) TV Producer & Media Consultant
Farid Abudhier (Palestine) Professor of Media at Al-Najah University - Nablus Farrah Adeeba (Malaysia) TV Presenter
Fatih Er (Turkey) Director of News, Programmes & Visual at TRT World
Francis Ameyibor (Ghana) Deputy News Editor at Ghana News Agency Gustavo Abu Arab (Argentina) Acredited Journalist at National Governemt House - Argentine
Hani Al Masri (Palestine) Director of Masarat Research Center
Hasina Kathrada (South Africa) Senior correspondent at SABC
Hassan Haider (Palestine) Executive Director of Quds Press International News Agency - UK
Hisham Qasem (Palestine) Director General
Hossam Shaker (Palestine) Media Consultant
Houreye Thiam (Senegal) TV Programs Presenter Hugh Miles (UK) Editor of ArabDigest.org
Imad Musa (Palestine) Digital Media Expert
Isra Al-Modallal (Palestine) Journalist & TV Presenter
Issa Qaraqe (Palestine) Ex-Minister of the Bureau of Prisoners Affairs
Jaber Alharmi (Qatar) Chief Editor of Al-Sharq Newspaper - Qatar
Jamal Rayyan (Palestine) Media Expert & TV Presenter
Jasim Al-Azzawi (Iraq) Anchor and Media Expert
Jimi Matthews (South Afrıca) Veteran Journalist & Former Head of News at SABC John Quigley (USA) Professor of Law at Ohio State University
Johnny Mansour (Palestine) Palestinian Historian and Writer Jonathan Steele (UK) Veteran Journalist & Guardian Columnist
Jorge Ramos Tolosa (Spain) Professor of Cont. History at the University of Valencia
Khaled Taha (Jordan) Technical and Media Consultant
Khalil Mabrouk (Palestine) Correspondent of Aljazeera.net - Turkey Leila Nachawati Rego (Spain) Spanish Writer & Human Rights Activist Luca Steinmann (Italia) Italian Journalist & Political Analyst Luisa Morgantini (Italy) Former Vice President of the European Parliament
Malik Ayub Sumbal (Pakistan) Political Commentator, Award Winning Journalist & Broadcaster Martin Lejeune (Germany) Journalist, Photographer & Human Rights Advocate
Marwah Jbara (Palestine) Palestinian Filmmaker & CEO of Zainab Productions Matteo Meloni (italy) Italian Journalist & Communication Professional
Metin MutanoÄŸlu (Turkey) Chief Editor of Anadolu Agency
Moeti Mohwasa (Botswana) Journalist and Writer
Mohamed Mansour Injay (Senegal) An announcer in Tubah channel - Senegal
Mohiyiddin Haris (India) Executive Editor at Tejas Daily Monica Maurer (Germany) International Filmmaker
Montaser Marai (Palestine) Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Journalism - Al Jazeera Media Institute
Mouad Khateb (Palestine) Human Rights Activist
Muad Zaki (Maldives) Journalist & Writer
Nada Atieh (Palestine) Ù€ournalist at Arab Reporters for Investigative Journalism (ARIJ)
Nafiz Abu Hasna (Palestine) Director of Palestine Today TV
Noureddine Miftah (Morocco) Moroccan Federation of Publishers
Nur Hasan Murtiaji (Indonesia) Deputy Chief Editor of Republika Newspaper Olivier Pironet (France) Journalist at Le Monde Diplomatique
Omar Abu Arqoub (Palestine) Researcher in Media Issues & Engineering of Consent Omar GarcÃa (Nicaragua) TV & Radio Newscaster
P. KOYA (India) Managing Editor at Tejas Daily PatrÃcia Campos Mello (Brazil) Journalist & Special Reporter
Pizaro Gozali (Indonesia) Chairman of JITU - Moslem Journalists Union
Prashant Tandon (India) Media Strategist & Consultant
Ramzy Baroud (Palestine) Journalist and Media Consultant
Rawan Damen (Palestine) Filmmaker and Media Consultant
Resul Serdar AtaÅŸ (Turkey) Director of News & Visuals at TRT Araby Romana Rubeo (Italy) Editor at The Palestine Chronicle
Saadiah Mufarreh (Kuwait) Kuwaiti Journalist and Writer
Said Abu Moalla (Palestine) Lecturer at Arab American University of Jenin
Salma Aljamal (Palestine) Palestinian Journalist at Aljazeera TV
Samia Labidi (France) Coordinator of the Palestine Films Meetings, Filmlab: Palestine
Seema Mustafa (India) Editor-in-Chief of "The Citizen"
Shafeeq Al-Ghabra (Kuwait) Political Analyst & Writer
Shafiq Morton (south Africa) RADIO JOURNALIST
Shahin Hasnat (Bangladesh) Vice President of Dhaka Union of Journalists
Shaker Aljawhari (Jordan) Director of Jordanian Digital Journalism Society
Siddharth Varadarajan (India) Founding Editor of thewire.in & former Editor of The Hindu
Sles Nazy (cambodia) President of Cambodian Muslim Media Center Soraya Misleh (Brazil) Member of International Ciranda of Shared Communication & Director of Institute of Arab Culture Susana Mangana (Spain) Columnist & Political Analyst Sylvain Cypel (France) Veteran French Journalist with Le Monde & Orient XXI
Talib Al Maamari (Oman) Journalist & Writer
Temiloluwa Bamgbose (Nigeria) Communications Consultant
Umud Mirzayev (Azerbaijan) President of International Eurasia Press Fund
Urmilesh Singh (India) Former Executive Editor at RSTV
Yassir Abu Heen (Palestine) Director of Safa News Agency - Palestine
Yousef Alshouly (Palestine) Palestinian Journalist
Zainab Ismail (Kenya) Senior news Anchor at Nation TV Ãngel MartÃnez (Spain) Chief Editor of International Section at El Confidencial
İsmail Sinani (Macedonia) Chief Editor of News at TV SHENJA
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
Last Saturday, Iran’s “moderate” President Hassan Rouhani called Israel “a cancerous tumor” in a speech at the regime’s annual Islamic Unity Conference.
Rouhani’s fellow speakers included deputy Hezbollah chief Naim Qassem and Hamas chief Ismail Haniyeh. Both terror bosses called for the destruction of the “cancerous tumor.”
With the predictability of a Swiss clock, the Europeans rushed to condemn Rouhani. The EU in Brussels condemned Rouhani. The German Foreign Ministry condemned Rouhani. And so on and so forth.
We could have done without their statements.
Just two days after Rouhani’s Jewish cancer speech, his representatives sat down with senior EU officials in Brussels to discuss Iranian-EU nuclear cooperation in the framework of the 2015 nuclear deal. Following the talks, EU Foreign Affairs Chief Federica Mogherini’s office put out a statement claiming that the sides “expressed their determination to preserve the nuclear agreement as... a key pillar for European and regional security.”
As Mogherini and her colleagues were sitting with the Iranians, the Wall Street Journal reported that the French and German governments have agreed to set up a back channel, in the form of a joint corporation, owned by European governments, whose job will be to arrange for payments for Iranian exports in a manner that bypasses and so undermines US financial and trade sanctions on Iran.
How are we to understand Europe’s behavior? What is possessing Germany and France and Brussels and even Britain, (which is reportedly considering joining the Germans and French in their sanctions-busting operations) to stand with Iran against the US?
It isn’t because Iran has proved its good intentions to them. To the contrary, over the past six months, Iran has plotted three terror attacks in Europe. In June, Iranian operatives murdered a regime opponent in Holland. In July, Belgian authorities prevented an Iranian plot to attack a regime opposition rally in Paris. And in October, Danish authorities intercepted an Iranian terror squad en route to assassinate the head of an organization of Ahwaz Arabs, Iran’s Arab minority that suffers from harsh repression at the hands of the regime.
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Saturday accused Iran of testing a medium-range ballistic missile capable of “carrying multiple warheads,” which he said could strike “anywhere” in the Middle East and even parts of Europe.
In a statement, Pompeo said the missile test violated United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231, which was adopted as part of the 2015 nuclear deal curbing Iran’s nuclear program and bans Iranian tests of nuclear-capable ballistic weapons.
He not specify when the test took place, but said it had “just” occurred.
Get The Times of Israel's Daily Edition by email and never miss our top stories
Free Sign Up
“As we have been warning for some time, Iran’s missile testing and missile proliferation is growing. We are accumulating risk of escalation in the region if we fail to restore deterrence,” Pompeo said.
He also called on Iran to “cease immediately all activities” related to the development of ballistic missiles designed to carry nuclear warheads.
No one should whitewash, rationalize, or excuse what former CNN contributor Marc Lamont Hill did this week. He spoke at a gathering of anti-Semites at the UN, a notoriously anti-Semitic institution, and called for violence against Israel and for destruction of the Jewish state. There is no other explanation for his actions that make the slightest bit of sense. He did not use a “dog whistle.” He stood and shouted.
Simply put, his actions were the left-wing anti-Semite version of walking into a white nationalist meeting and speaking the infamous 14 words.
On Wednesday, Hill spoke at a U.N. event honoring the International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People and made two despicable statements. First, he at length defended violent Palestinian resistance against Israel. He condemned romanticizing or fetishizing peace, scorned the politics of “respectability,” and compared Palestinian resistance to slave rebellions. He added that while “we must promote non-violence at every opportunity” he could not “endorse narrow politics that shames Palestinians for resisting, for refusing to do nothing in ethnic cleansing.”
This is important context for his second statement, an explicit call for a “free Palestine from the river to the sea.” In other words, he called for violence with an explicit anti-Semitic goal — the physical destruction of the Jewish state of Israel.
Why do I compare this statement to the white supremacist’s 14 words? (For those who are blessedly ignorant of white-supremacist propaganda, the 14 words are “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.”) Because of content and context. The content is plain enough. “Palestine” is not Israel and Israel is not Palestine. Any two-state solution would not result in a Palestine “from the river to the sea.” He is expressing a desire for a one-state solution, and that state is not Israel. A free Palestine in that context means the destruction of the Jewish state. Full stop.
Mediaite reported first on Thursday that Hill had been dismissed, quoting a CNN spokesman with a one-sentence statement: "Marc Lamont Hill is no longer under contract with CNN." That same statement went out to multiple other outlets, although it was unclear at first when he had been dropped—an IQ Media search showed he hadn't been on the network since September. The Washington Free Beacon confirmed with a separate source that Hill had been terminated that day.
The spokeswoman handling the matter, Barbara Levin, did not return multiple calls and emails on Thursday and Friday asking for elaboration. CNN also did not outright condemn his comments in any statement. The Free Beacon will update the story if it gets responses.
Some labor disputes end with both sides agreeing to remain silent, although it's unclear if that's the situation regarding Hill and CNN.
Rabbi Abraham Cooper of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, a nonprofit that works to combat global anti-Semitism, praised CNN for its reporting on anti-Semitism in Europe and for terminating Hill, but he said it would be "appropriate and helpful" for CNN to be explicit about what merited the firing.
"The Simon Wiesenthal Center is appreciative that CNN, through its poll and reportage on anti-Semitism, has generated a global focus on history’s oldest hate that will hopefully help to break down the apathy and lack of understanding of the scope that it poses to Jews here in the Americas and Europe," Cooper told the Free Beacon in a statement.
"We are also grateful that CNN took decisive action in firing Marc Lamont Hill as a commentator after his horrible speech at the United nations," Cooper continued. "This is one of the few times in recent memory where there has been a price to pay for this kind of behavior. It would be appropriate and important for CNN to add in a sentence or two, linking their decision to Lamont Hill’s extreme anti-Israel/anti-Semitic and pro-terrorist views and rhetoric. It would be appropriate and helpful if CNN would state for the record, if they haven’t already, that he was let go for those reasons."
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
Bigotry extends to the ballot box. The Alternative für Deutschland, led by a man who dismissed the Nazis as a mere “speck of bird poop” in Germany’s otherwise glorious history, is now the country’s third-largest party. The National Front in France, founded by a man who called the gas chambers a “detail in the history of World War II,” got 33.9 percent of the vote in the last presidential runoff elections. The Freedom Party in Austria, founded by ex-Nazis, is now part of the governing coalition. Then there is the rise of Law and Justice in Poland and Golden Dawn in Greece — developments cheered by those countries’ Jew haters.
But the story of European anti-Semitism isn’t simply a case of the resurgence of the neo-fascist right.
A large number of physically violent acts committed against Jews in Europe are perpetrated by radical Muslims. The incidents at the top of this article were not carried out by far-right goons but by Islamists, most of them young and some of them immigrants.
Now add a third ingredient to this toxic brew: the fashionable anti-Semitism of the far left that masquerades as anti-Zionism and anti-racism.
No political leader in Europe embodies that sentiment more than Britain’s Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn. He paid respects at the memorial of the Palestinian perpetrators of the 1972 Munich Olympics massacre. He objected to the destruction of a street mural depicting despotic hooknosed Jewish bankers. He participated for over a decade in the activities of a group called Deir Yassin Remembered, which was led by a Holocaust denier. He publicly defended a virulently anti-Semitic vicar named Stephen Sizer. He invited an Islamist preacher who believes Jews use gentile blood for religious reasons to tea at Parliament. And so on.
And yet he adamantly denies being an anti-Semite, on the grounds that he has devoted his life to “exposing racism in any form.”
Anti-Semitism, though, isn’t just a brand of bigotry. It’s a conspiracy theory in which Jews play the starring role in spreading evil in the world. While racists see themselves as proudly punching down, anti-Semites perceive themselves as punching up.
When supporters of Israel worldwide think about November 29, they think about miracles.
In the year 1897, Theodore Herzl convened the First Zionist Congress and proclaimed the right of the Jewish people to national rebirth in its own country.
This right was recognized in the Balfour Declaration of 1917, and re-affirmed in the Mandate of the League of Nations which, in particular, gave international sanction to the historic connection between the Jewish people and the land of Israel and to the right of the Jewish people to rebuild its national home.
November 29, 1947, marked one of the greatest milestones along the road to realizing the miracle of the modern Jewish state. On that day, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution calling for the establishment of a Jewish state in Eretz Yisrael. This recognition by the United Nations of the right of the Jewish people to establish their state is irrevocable.
Subsequent events cemented this miracle, including how the nascent Jewish state proceeded to declare independence, and then to defy the odds by overcoming formidable Arab armies in the War of Independence. But the roots of miracle were planted at the UN on November 29.
I’ve dedicated both my career and personal life to appreciating, advocating for, and preserving this miracle. Now, quite fittingly on the date of November 29, I’ve added an even more personal layer as to my part in the sacred responsibility that we all share of securing this miracle.
On Thursday, I began my new role as world chairman of Keren Hayesod – UIA (United Israel Appeal). Born and raised in a religious Zionist environment in Miami Beach, I’ve long savored the realization of a modern Jewish state and the Jewish people’s miracle of sovereignty in their ancestral homeland. But even as I advanced in my career working on behalf of the State of Israel, it would have been hard to imagine that I would find myself at the helm of an organization that has the most direct connection possible to the state itself by serving as the fund-raising arm of the global Zionist movement.
This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For 20 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.
June 2025
-
June 1, JPost: BBC bans Gaza freelancer who describes Jews as ‘devils’ The
BBC has banned a Gaza reporter who described Jews as “devils,”...
The post Jun...
June 2025
-
June 1, JPost: BBC bans Gaza freelancer who describes Jews as ‘devils’ The
BBC has banned a Gaza reporter who described Jews as “devils,”...
The post Jun...
Concertgoers Cheer Muslim Terrorists Killing Them
-
On Nov 13, 2015, Muslim terrorists attacked a concert at the Bataclan
theater in Paris, opening fire on the crowd while shouting, “Allah Akbar.”
The Mu...
July 4th 1976, Happy Entebbe Day!
-
Dry Bones Golden Oldies in the fond memory of Yaakov Kirschen (Dry Bones)
by Sali, Happy Entebbe Day! July 4th 1976
and Happy Independence Day to Ameri...
The NUJ is hostile to Jewish journalists
-
For several years I had a press card to provide a layer of security while
covering hostile street protests. My recent experience with the National
Union ...
One Choice: Fight to Win
-
Yesterday Israel preempted a potentially disastrous attack by Hezbollah on
the center of the country. Thirty minutes before launch time, our aircraft
destr...
Closing Jews Down Under Website
-
With a heavyish heart I am closing down the website after ten years.
It is and it isn’t an easy decision after 10 years of constant work. The
past...
‘Test & Trace’ is a mirage
-
Lockdown II thoughts: Day 1 Opposition politicians have been banging on
about the need for a ‘working’ Test & Trace system even more loudly than
the govern...