Emgage is a moderate American Muslim group that "seeks to educate, engage and empower Muslim American communities through educational events, voter initiatives, and leadership development for the purpose of creating a community of equitable, knowledgeable, and motivated citizens."
Joe Biden's Muslim American outreach advisor is a member of Emgage, and it seems to have raised its profile significantly during the Biden campaign.
Ali Abunimah goes through his usual attempts of smearing by association as he ticks off the supposed offenses of Emgage's leadership. For example, members of Emgage attended the Muslim Leadership Initiative, sponsored by the Shalom Hartman Institute in Israel, to give thinking Muslim American professionals information about Israel. Abunimah and BDSers absolutely hate MLI because it shows that normal Muslims are not necessarily the BDS drones that Israel-haters want the world to believe. So Abunimah tries to smear MLI by saying
MLI is managed by Turkish-born Duke University professor Abdullah Antepli and Brooklyn-born Israeli author Yossi Klein Halevi, a former adherent of Meir Kahane.
Kahane was the founder of the violent racist Israeli party Kach, which is designated by the US State Department as a foreign terrorist organization.
The idea that MLI and Meir Kahane shared any common ground is laughable, but it shows how Abunimah tries to smear anyone who doesn't share his bigoted, antisemitic views.
Abunimah also goes on a rant against what he calls "faithwashing" - having Jewish and Muslim groups talk to each other to find common ground. Really.
Emgage's main crime, to Abunimah, is that it is not focused like he is on hating Israel. Its issues page talks about oppression of Uyghur and Rohingya and Kashmir Muslims - but not Palestinians (who are living a dream compared to those other groups.) Emgage apparently commissioned a survey of issues most important to Muslim Americans - and, as with Jews who vote Democrat, the Middle East was not a top concern.
Abunimah's main issue with the group is that these are Muslims who think for themselves, and don't automatically adopt the extremist pro-terror position of the BDS crowd. BDS and haters like Abunimah depend on making the world think that all Muslims are as bigoted and hateful as they are, which gives the impression of widespread support for their anti-Israel positions. Normal Muslim Americans, meanwhile, have other issues that are more important to them.
I'm sure I would have disagreements with Emgage members on Israel and the Middle East. But they seem to be willing to listen and have a conversation, rather than boycotting mainstream Jews as the haters want.
Abunimah's deranged article tells us far more about his unhinged hate than about Emgage.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
The fallout from the UAE/Israel deal reverberates every day in the larger Arab world, in surprising ways.
Jordanian media has been the most hostile to Jews. But this article, while it fully embraces antisemitic stereotypes, is more admiring of the supposed plots of Jews to take over the world than afraid.
Prof. Bilal Abu Al-Hoda Khamash, a frequent contributor to Alsaa.net, writes:
The events of history that took place in the past and are in the present and expected to happen in the future have proven that the Jews are the most capable nation for planning in the short and long terms, for hundreds and perhaps thousands of years since God created them and after the mission of our master Muhammad, peace be upon him.
It goes on to say that the Rothschilds were very shrewd in how they took over the world's financial system, how they used the Protocols of the Elders of Zion to achieve their power, and how Sheldon Adelson is their spiritual descendant in using his money to influence Donald Trump to have pro-Israel policies.
The [Rothschilds'] had strong will and unlimited patience to reach their goals set within their master plan and their sub-plans for the whole world. Intellectuals and informed people in the world still remember the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which they had planned for more than a hundred years with their successful organization and management. They were and still are distributing tasks to each member in the set plan according to his abilities and capabilities and not according to any other criteria, and they only reveal their secret to those who can keep the secret. They do not divulge it under any circumstances. By their will, confidentiality, and boundless patience, they picked, reaped, and would reap the fruits of their plans as planned.
These characteristics are characteristic of most, if not all, of the Jews in the world.
While Khamash still believes in antisemitic stereotypes, they have suddenly morphed from hate into admiration - sort of how many South Koreans look at Jews.
Again, while there have been articles in the past in Arabic media that were grudgingly admiring of Jews and trying to learn from them (often using Nobel Prize winners as a proxy for success,) there has been a significant change in recent weeks. And some of it is more antisemitic than beforehand as well, where people who disapprove of the UAE try to find religious based reasons to oppose it and invariably that goes back to Koranic views of Jews.
Things have been shaken up, and it is fascinating to watch.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
Not long ago I wrote about one of Israel’s “soft enemies,” who choose to fight the Jewish state with money rather than bullets and explosives: the European Union. Indeed, the European Union has just demonstrated its hostility by threatening to torpedo (see also here) the bids of Serbia and Kosovo to join the EU if they persist in their intention to open embassies in Jerusalem.
Now, when the formerly impenetrable anti-Israel solidarity of Arab and Muslim nations has finally begun to crumble, our soft enemies seem to be pursuing the war against Jewish self-determination even more aggressively. Today I want to discuss yet another one, this time one that weaponizes American dollars: the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.
The Rockefeller fortune began with John D. Rockefeller, certainly the richest American in history, and indeed one of the most wealthy humans ever. Rockefeller founded Standard Oil in 1870, and before he died in 1937 (at the age of 98), he donated enormous sums for various charitable purposes, in the areas of education, health, scientific research, and causes connected to his Baptist faith. He established various foundations during his lifetime to facilitate the disbursement of his wealth. Very much a free-market conservative, he nevertheless took seriously his personal commitment to those less fortunate than himself and his family. He had four daughters and a son, J. D. Rockefeller Jr. “Junior” continued his father’s philanthropy, including founding the Rockefeller Museum in eastern Jerusalem (the site of a 1967 battle, now operated by the Israel Antiquities Authority).
John D. Rockefeller Jr. had a daughter and five sons. One was Nelson, who had a long career in public service, serving as Governor of New York from 1959-73, and Vice President under Gerald Ford from 1974-77. Nelson was socially liberal and considered a moderate on economic issues; he was the paradigmatic “moderate Republican.” Another was David, who was Chairman and CEO of the Chase Manhattan Bank from 1969-81, and was a director of the influential Council on Foreign Relations from 1959.
The Rockefeller Brothers Fund (RBF) was started by “Junior’s” five sons in 1940, who were its first trustees. It received large endowments from J. D. Rockefeller Jr., in 1951, and David Rockefeller, who gave it $225 million in 2006.
Note that there is also a Rockefeller Foundation (started by J. D. the patriarch in 1913), and a Rockefeller Family Fund (started by younger family members in 1967). They are not the subject of this article.
The RBF gradually moved politically leftward as time went by, especially after Stephen Heintz became its president and CEO in 2001. Ironically, it divested from investments in fossil fuels – the original source of Rockefeller money – in 2014.
It has strongly advocated for and funded advocates of the JCPOA – the nuclear deal with Iran – and criticized US President Trump for exiting from it. Armin Rosen notes that “Between 2012 and 2015, RBF gave $4.4 million to the Ploughshares Fund,” which then “led the public campaign in favor of the [Obama] administration’s Iran diplomacy. Ploughshares … gave National Public Radio $100,000 toward its coverage of the Iran nuclear issue.”
In 2011, RBF began its “Peacebuilding” program, and it started to make grants related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Today it supports various organizations and programs whose goal is to eliminate the Jewish state. It funds the group “Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP),” which supports boycott-divestment-sanctions (BDS) of Israel, and which was called one of the top 10 anti-Israel groups in America by the ADL. It has made grants to IfNotNow, the BDS-supporting student organization. It supports the American Friends Service Committee, which also promotes BDS, and numerous other BDS-supporting groups, including the umbrella organization for BDS in the US, the US Campaign for Palestinian Rights (USCPR). The USCPR is deeply involved in the successful campaign to get the “mainline” Protestant churches like the Presbyterian Church USA and the United Church of Christ to adopt BDS. USCPR also pushes the absurdly false but popular idea that the movement to destroy Israel is analogous to the American civil rights movement.
At this link is a partial list of grants made by RBF to groups that are to a greater or lesser extent involved in activities to demonize and delegitimize the Jewish state, in “lawfare” against it, or even which have connections to anti-Israel terrorist organizations. One of the largest recipients of RBF money is J Street, the phony “pro-Israel” lobbying organization which has consistently taken positions opposed to Israeli interests. Other recipients include Zochrot, an Israeli NGO that wants to “dezionize” the state, Breaking the Silence, which defames IDF soldiers, and Adalah, a group that works to radicalize Arab citizens of Israel and incite them against the state. There are dozens of other groups, each of which has its own particular angle to attack Israel.
It’s unlikely that David Rockefeller, also a moderate Republican, would have approved of the uses to which his bequest was put. His Chase Manhattan Bank was the agent for Israel Bonds in the US, making it a target of the Arab boycott. And unlike another tycoon, Henry Ford, there is no evidence that the founder of the dynasty, John D. Rockefeller was antisemitic.
One of the notable images used by Jew-haters from 19th-century Europe, through the Nazi period, and including today’s European and Middle-Eastern antisemites is the hook-nosed Jewish spider sitting in the center of his web, pulling strings that stretch his malign power throughout the world. But in reality, the opposite is true: there are a number of anti-Israel puppet masters, pulling the strings – and streaming money – into the literally thousands of loci of misozionist hate around the world. Money that originates in the European Union, the RBF, the Ford Foundation*, and George Soros’ Open Society Foundation and its satellites, flows into the numerous anti-Israel NGOs, student organizations, propaganda organs, Middle East Studies programs, and so forth.
Think about it. It’s truly marvelous. Has there ever been another enterprise like this in history? All this, aimed and concentrated against one tiny country, my country! _________________
* The Ford Foundation funded many of the same organizations as the RBF until 2013, when it was convinced to stop supporting anti-state NGOs in Israel. It still provides funds for international groups like Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, Oxfam, etc. that are strongly biased against Israel.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
As was the case in those BBC reports from 50 years ago, throughout the programme presenter Bob Howard referred to the terrorist organisation to which the hijackers belonged using the euphemistic term “militants” and the word terrorists was not heard once.
Howard: “The two hijackers, a man and a woman, armed with a revolver and a hand grenade, now effectively held the 155 passengers and crew hostage. They were hoping to use them as a prisoner exchange for Palestinian militants held in various jails in Israel and Europe.”
As we have previously had cause to note, three of the prisoners described by Howard as “militants” had carried out a terror attack on an El Al plane in Zurich the previous year and three others had carried out an attack on a bus carrying El Al passengers at Munich airport on February 10th 1970, killing one person and wounding several others.
Listeners were told that: Howard: “…over the course of three days there’d been attempts to hijack four other [sic] planes. One had failed, resulting in the death of a hijacker but another three had succeeded. […] Three days later a BOAC VC10 was hijacked en route to London and also flown to the same Jordanian airfield.”
Howard: “The hijackers of the three planes had joined with other PFLP militants and were now looking to escape from Dawson’s Field.”
Howard did not clarify that the point of that later hijacking was to pressure the British authorities to release Leila Khaled who had taken part in the failed hijacking of an El Al flight. Later listeners heard that:
Howard: “Although all of the passengers survived their ordeal, several PFLP prisoners had been released in exchange…”
BBC World Service audiences heard nothing about the British government’s negotiations with the PFLP concerning the release of Khaled or the radio station’s own small role in that story:
“At 7pm on 13 September, the BBC World Service broadcast a government announcement in Arabic saying that the UK would swap Khaled for the hostages.”
Howard’s superficial portrayal of Black September likewise included presentation of additional terrorist factions as “militants”.
The Arabs have alays maintained that a "Palestine" was included in the British pledge made during the McMahon-Hussein talks.
I found this: PALESTINE (MANDATE AND BALFOUR DECLARATION).HC Deb 09 December 1929
§33. Mr. de ROTHSCHILD asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether His Majesty's Government have made any promises or pledges to the Arab-speaking populations of Palestine or neighbouring countries which invalidate in any way the Balfour Declaration of 2nd November, 1917, or the clauses of the Mandate for Palestine as approved by the League of Nations?
§The UNDER-SECRETARY of STATE for the COLONIES (Dr. Drummond Shiels) I have been asked to answer. The position in regard to this question was fully stated in the White Paper (Cmd. 1700) of 1922, to which I would refer the hon. Member. His Majesty's Government have always held that there is nothing in their pledges that could invalidate the Balfour Declaration or conflict with the terms of the Mandate.
§Colonel HOWARD-BURY Is it not the case that on 24th October, 1915, Sir Henry McMahon made a declaration stating I am empowered in the name of the British Government to recognise and support the independence of the Arabs within the limits of the boundaries proposed by King Hussein and that these limits included Palestine?
§Dr. SHIELS As regards the first supplementary question, I think it is true to say that the facts which I have stated are perfectly well known. The position is that which the British Government have always taken up in this matter. In regard to the second supplementary question, the pledge to which my hon. and gallant Friend referred was not made to the Palestinian Arabs, and the British Government have always taken the view that Palestine was excluded from that pledge.
Diana Buttu has another screed up today in the New York Times about how the Israel-UAE deal supposedly betrays the Palestinians. I can leave much of Buttu's article to others, but one part has been mentioned numerous times before without sufficient rebuttal (Daniel Pipes provieds one example of rebuttal is here) and is at the root of the narrative of Israeli Goliath wantonly oppressing Palestinian David.
Beginning in 1993 with the signing of the Oslo Accords, the P.L.O. embarked on a process of negotiation with Israel that was supposed to lead — at least as the Palestinians viewed it — to an independent state, kicked off by recognition of Israel.
Buttu is correct that the signing the Oslo Accords in 1993 meant that the P.L.O. embarked on a negotiation process with Israel that kicked off with a recognition of Israel. She might even be correct that rank-and-file Palestinians only sought an independent state for themselves. However, the P.L.O. viewed the Oslo Accords as a means to strength the Palestinian national movement and weaken Israel so as to achieve what decades of conventional warfare and terrorism had been unable to achieve, which is the eradication of Israel. Yasir Arafat's talk to a Muslim audience in South Africa, in which he cited the Treaty of Hudaibiyah as a precedent entering into the Oslo Accords, makes sense once one assumes that motive.
For years, Israelis were in denial that the Palestinians sought Israel's destructions and insisted to themselves that they only wanted a some degree of independence for themselves. However, repeated muggings by reality have forced the overwhelming majority of Israelis to recognize the Palestinians' true objectives. In response, Israelis have decided to stop cooperating in their own destruction and have voted for parties that are reliable to withhold that cooperation. The end of any progress towards a Palestinian state is the result.
Ardie Geldman is a people person who happens to love Israel. That makes it only natural he'd use his people skills to impart the truth about Israel to visiting groups of tourists who often have a negative view of the Jewish State. Geldman calls his initiative iTalkIsrael, and the work is having an impact even if it's only to draw attention to the idea that hey: when it comes to Israel, there's another narrative out there to consider.
At 68, Ardie looks many years younger, and shows no signs of slowing down, so don't count him out. He's right in the thick of things on the Israel front, offering straight talk on settlements and Arab terror to often-hostile tourists and students who show up with all kinds of ignorant preconceptions. Anyone else, this author, for instance, would have lost their mind arguing with these people, eons ago. But Ardie keeps on keeping on, using his God-given talents to make a difference for his beloved country, Israel.
Ardie Geldman
Ardie's late father, Z"L. "My Zionist Inspiration."
Varda Epstein: Can
you tell us a bit about yourself, your family, where you’re from, why you made
Aliyah?
Ardie Geldman: I was born and raised in Chicago. My mom,
z”l, was also born and raised in Chicago. My father, z”l, was born in
Bessarabia, later Romania, in a city called Bolghrad, today in Southeast
Ukraine. He came to Eretz Yisrael as a chalutz
[pioneer V.E.] in 1920 and stayed for about a year, helping to construct the
first paved roads in the Galilee near Tiberias.
According to my father’s American visa application his residence in Israel was “HaMashbir Tiberias.” I believe that this was the first HaMashbir enterprise [HaMashbir is a chain of department stores in Israel, V.E.] established under the then newly formed Histadrut [General Organization of Workers in Israel, V.E.]. After contracting and, B”H, recovering from malaria, common then and there, he accepted his aunt’s and uncle’s invitation to come live in America, specifically Milwaukee, WI. My father lived there for a few years but subsequently moved south to Chicago where employment opportunities were better. There he met my mother. I am the result.
Ardie and Ivonne Geldman
I am sure that the few stories my father told me about his experiences here, when I was quite young, planted a seed in me that, along with
other influences, including the 1960 movie Exodus, contributed to my decision
to live my life in Israel. My wife was also born in the States. She came to
Israel immediately after high school. While neither of my parents personally
experienced the Holocaust, my late father-in-law was a prisoner in a number of
concentration camps and lost much of his family at the hands of the Nazis. His
experiences, I’m sure, influenced my wife’s Zionism and contributed to her
decision to live here.
Both myself and my wife were raised in secular Jewish homes
and independently were drawn to a religious-Zionist way of life before we met. We moved to Israel in 1982 and lived in Petach Tikvah for the first three years. We
have been living in Efrat since 1985. Here we raised six children and have been
blessed, so far, with 10 grandchildren.
Varda Epstein: When did
you start italkIsrael and why?
Ardie Geldman: What
became iTalkIsrael began with my speaking to media people, Jewish tourists and Jewish
organizations that would visit Efrat in the late 1980s and especially in the
early 1990s while I was an elected member of the Efrat Town Council. The mayor
of Efrat at that time barely spoke English and my flexible work schedule,
overseeing sundry community development projects in Israel on behalf of the
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, allowed me to arrange my time to
meet with these groups.
In those days I
would say that nine out of ten such Jewish groups were gung-ho about
“settlements” like Efrat [Efrat has official town status, but since it is
located in Judea, is often condemned as a “settlement,” V.E.], whereas today, representatives
of Jewish organizations coming here most often say that we are an “obstacle to
peace.” At some point during the 1990s, and I don’t remember exactly when, I
believe that my name was shared with a guide that brought to Efrat what turned
out to be a non-Jewish, pro-Palestinian group from Australia. I don’t remember
much else about this group other than being on the receiving end of hostile
questions for the first time; it was like suddenly being kicked in the stomach.
In short, word then
got around to these types of groups that there is a “settler” who lives in an
“illegal settlement” near Bethlehem who is willing to meet with pro-Palestinian
foreigners. For years I did just that, speaking to mostly pro-Palestinian
groups in Efrat for 1½ to 2 hours who, with but few exceptions, left with the
same jaundiced and deluded views of “settlers” and “settlements” with which
they came. It seemed that almost all left with the same scripted non-committal
line, “Thank you for your time.” This meant to me that the content of my
presentation had fallen upon deaf ears.
iTalkIsrael was created
to change that response. It was an initiative that emerged following the
experience of three Christian college students, women, who were the only ones
that, during a short lecture visit, took me up on my invitation to the entire
group to return and spend a traditional Jewish Shabbat with Efrat families. The
three had an amazing time and this convinced their program director to include
a three-day Shabbat weekend stay in Efrat for some 30 Christian students the
following year. This first experience indicated to me that I was onto something
and my marketing efforts have led to the participation of additional Christian
student programs.
Christian students listen intently to Efrat resident.
Varda Epstein: Can
you tell me about the demographic of the people you work with?
Ardie Geldman: The demographic is mixed if you overlook the
fact that the majority of the groups with whom I meet are mostly Christian. With
respect to age the participants range from high-school groups to mature adults.
The only groups that spend a full Shabbat weekend (Thursday through Sunday morning)
in Efrat are Christian college students. All the others, mostly from the U.S.
and Canada, but also from the United Kingdom, Western European countries and
Australia (though not to the best of my recollection from either Central or
South America or Africa) come only for short, hour-and-a-half lectures.
Some groups represent mainstream “high church,” such as
Presbyterians or Methodists, while others are Quakers and Mennonites. Some come
from independent congregations that do not belong to any major Christian
denomination. However, about a quarter of the groups with whom I meet are
secular, self-defined social justice or human rights groups. Among these,
especially if they come from the States, is often a sprinkling of (very
deluded) Jews. The latter often make a point of letting me know that they are
Jews, especially when they stand up and condemn Israel, the IDF, and settlers.
I have to say that I never sensed any antisemitism in any of the Christian college groups; not even a hint. In fact, so many left Efrat saying how much they enjoyed learning about Judaism. Some even said that they would stop using electronics on the Sabbath (Sunday, for them). On the other hand, I did encounter antisemitism from time to time among the groups that came for only a lecture. This happened with a few church groups as well as some so-called "social justice" groups. Three years ago I literally threw out a student group from a major East coast university and did the same two years ago with a group of adults from Belgium.
Learning to bake challah bread (challot).
Varda Epstein: On
your website you have a blurb: “Come for a real
education.” What does this mean?
Ardie Geldman: It means to be exposed to ideas with which
they are unfamiliar, or even opposed, and to a variety of opinions about
religion and politics, even within just one Jewish “settler” community. Here is
a quote from a recent email I received from a director of one of the
participating Christian college programs that reflects the work of iTalkIsrael:
“It's been so long that we had a decent argument - I
genuinely miss coming to Efrat and engaging in the wonderfully hot
conversations we had over the years. I consider the times spent with you and
Ivonne as one of my top memories during the two decades of bringing
students to the Middle East. You have given me a lasting appreciation for
Judaism, a deeper respect for Zionism, and both a deeper understanding - as
well as a recognition of my own limitations on understanding - of living in
Israel in "disputed territory."
Dialogue with Efrat youth over pizza on a Saturday night.
Varda Epstein: What
is your goal for each group that comes to you, or does that vary from group to
group?
Ardie Geldman: For the short visit groups the only objective
is to plant a tiny seed of doubt among even just a handful of the visitors
about their views of the conflict. Over the years, from time to time, a few
people would approach me after I am done speaking while the others are making
their way back to the bus and say something like “Thank you so much. We are not
hearing any of this.”
The goal for the Shabbat weekend groups is more ambitious. First
I’ll tell you what it is not. It is not to transform the visitors into
Christian right-wing Zionists. It is to disarm them, to confuse them, to reduce
their suspicion and distrust, and even to develop positive, longer-lasting
relations with people in Efrat; in short to “humanize the settlers” in their
eyes. Based on the obligatory written feedback I receive from each and every
participant, I can say that, yes, at least immediately following their “Shabbat
in Efrat” experience, this goal is 100% realized.
Christian college students dialogue with Efrat yeshiva high school seniors in the Efrat library.
Varda Epstein: Do you
ever correspond with those who hear your lectures, when their trip to Israel is
only a memory?
Ardie Geldman: Other than those very few who contacted me not
long after their visit because they were writing a term paper and needed some
additional information, the general answer is no. The reason for this is
interesting. The college programs that come fly under the radar. That is to
say, there is an implicit understanding with each program director that their
students’ participation in a weekend program in an “illegal settlement” where
they are home-hosted by “illegal settlers” remains on the QT.
The directors actually obfuscate this part of their
“Israel-Palestine” itinerary from their colleagues and their other program
partners in Jordan, Egypt, Turkey, and of course, the Palestinian Authority. I’m
not sure how they do it, but I have a feeling that not even all of their
superiors in their respective colleges are aware of the Efrat stay. It does not
appear on the respective programs’ website, although visiting Israel does.
Two years ago a group almost dropped out after the director
became enraged after reading my Commentary piece that mentioned these programs, even
though I purposely didn’t identify any of the programs by name nor their
schools. In other words, the program directors wish to maximize anonymity and
want total control over the students’ ties to the program. Consequently, they
do not share their email addresses with me. I would very much have liked to be
given their email addresses all these years in order to follow up and see how
much of an impact the Efrat experience has on the students in the long run. Having
said all of this, some of the participating Efrat host families, at the request
of individual students, do maintain email contact with the latter.
Some students, I have been told, have even returned to visit
their Efrat hosts on subsequent trips to Israel and “Palestine.” Some students
over the years came back for the Purim seudah
[feast, V.E.]; others attended a wedding celebrated by their Efrat host family.
If you consider where these students’ heads were when they first arrived in
Efrat, yes, the “Shabbat in Efrat” program does chalk up some impressive
achievements.
Ardie hosts a small group in his home in Efrat.
Varda Epstein: If
someone spends their entire trip exposed only to the progressive narrative on
Israel, is hearing you speak enough to offer balance?
Ardie Geldman: Absolutely not. The cognitive dissonance
factor is way, way too strong. The theme under which the short,
hour-and-a-half-visit groups operate is “Don’t bother me with facts, my mind is
made up.” I believe that to be true for over 90% of those whose visit to Efrat
takes place in the midst of a highly propagandized 10-day (on average) tour.
So why do they come? They come because “settlements” are
controversial and coming to one is a titillating experience. They come to take
notes and photographs that they use in their own pro-Palestinian propaganda
work back home. And some come for the opportunity to chastise a settler in
person for the evil he represents.
That is why I developed the “Shabbat in Efrat” program. It
is based on the principle contained in this Maya Angelou quote: “People will forget what you said, people will forget what
you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.”
Christian college students visit Efrat preschool.
I have come to
believe that the myriad lectures, PowerPoint presentations, video clips,
websites, tweets, articles, books, etc., etc., etc. that tell the truth about
Israel and the “Palestinians” don’t amount to a hill of beans in comparison to
a positive and extended emotional experience. Such an experience requires the
time not afforded by a lecture. In fact, I believe that a series of even great
lectures, regardless of how outstanding the lecturer(s), is relatively
ineffective at changing hearts and minds. The only thing that I am convinced
can do this requires two key elements: (1) an intimate personal experience and
(2) sufficient time. That is why “Shabbat in Efrat” is a 3-4 day program.
Things that the
students are told on the first day but would reject out of hand as “Zionist
settler” propaganda are towards the end of the program suddenly palatable and
worth considering, possibly even true! This is especially the case when
statements that conflict with their current beliefs about Israel, about Israeli
“settlers,” about the “settlements” or “Palestinians” are uttered by members of
their host family, and especially around the Shabbat table. The effect of this
experience is almost miraculous and is reflected over and over again in the
students’ written responses on the questionnaires they complete just prior to
their departure. I have collected over 800 questionnaires from student participants.
Varda Epstein: What
would you like first-time visitors to Israel to know?
Ardie Geldman: (1) The Middle East is not the Midwest, or: Dorothy,
you’re not in Kansas, anymore. Many values here are different than those by
which people live in Western countries. It is a conceit and counterproductive
to try and understand political and social events and developments in this part
of the world through a western lens.
(2) The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not “good guys vs.
bad guys.” It is far more complex and nuanced than they likely appreciate.
(3) Yes, to be honest, there are moral failures on both
sides of the conflict; no nation state, no society is perfect. But there is no
comparison between the quantity and enormity of such failures committed by the
Palestinian side and those on the Israeli side. Unfortunately, there are
examples of individual Israelis who have committed some unacceptable act of
violence, and of course we never hear the end of these. But Israel is condemned
most often for legitimate acts of self-defense. The Palestinian side, in
contrast, is guilty of ongoing systematic and strategic acts of terror and
violence. There IS a difference and that difference must be appreciated by
anyone who wishes to understand the conflict.
(4) Finally, with regard to first time visitors, they need
to be told that Palestinian spokespeople are masters of the tragic visage. They
take people to sites and expose them to heartrending images. These are either
presented out of context, such as (A) bringing visitors to the sordid living
conditions of refugee camps and blaming Israel for their existence, while
drawing their attention away from the mansions and expensive, late model cars
situated just across the road, or (B) as outright lies, pointing out the water
tanks on rooftops and telling visitors that Israel purposely denies the
“Palestinians” sufficient amounts of water.
Varda Epstein: What’s
the dumbest question you were ever asked about Israel and how do you answer
that question?
Ardie Geldman: The dumbest, and also the most offensive
question, uttered only a few times throughout the years is “How can Israel do
to the Palestinians what the Nazis did to the Jews?”
Varda Epstein: What’s
the question you’re asked most and how do you respond?
Ardie Geldman: Without a doubt, that question is: “Why did
you choose to live in a settlement and not somewhere else in Israel?” And my
answer is inevitably is “Because I agree with the Palestinians. There is no
difference between Efrat and Tel-Aviv.”
Varda Epstein: What
wisdom can you impart to us for dealing with people who are certain that Israel
is an occupier oppressing its Arab minority? Do you have an elevator pitch for
such people? A question that stops them in their tracks?
Ardie Geldman: That is exactly the point. In the case of
such an emotionally fraught issue where the disinformation is so deeply
ingrained there is no such thing as an effective elevator pitch. We have our
facts; they have their facts. We have our anecdotes; they have their anecdotes.
The cognitive dissonance that is created when a conflicting
opinion or idea is raised protects the “Palestinian” narrative like an Etrog. You
just can’t get to it. The words, the facts, they just bounce off.
The only way to get past it, to break through, to penetrate
it, is by way of a positive experience over time, meaning at least a few days. That
is the lesson of iTalkIsrael. The “Palestinians” learned a long time ago that the
way to a person’s brain is through their heart and NOT the other way around.
You must change the heart before you can change the mind. That is true in many
other areas of life and it is no less true here.
"She had just said in our group discussion that Israel practices racism. Then we came across these two IDF soldiers on the group's way back to the bus."
Varda Epstein: What’s
next for you and italkIsrael?
Ardie Geldman: I have a "business plan," if you will, to
duplicate the iTalkIsrael experience in five other Jewish communities in Judea
and Samaria. What we have been doing so successfully in Efrat for eight years,
the Shabbat weekends, can and should be implemented elsewhere. Before the
Corona pandemic we were hosting some 100-150 students in Efrat per year. The “Shabbat
in Efrat” program has proven itself as a kind of beta plan. There is no reason
why this can’t, within 2-3 years, grow to some 1,500 and more participants.
I would also like to create a training institute to teach
others the advocacy principles and skills that I have acquired over the years. I
have a huge, I would even say unique, library of materials waiting for this. All
that is missing are the financial resources to put this in motion.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
I have discussed at length how critical the understanding the Arab honor/shame culture is in interpreting how Arabs act, specifically towards Israel. Israel's very existence has been an intense source of shame for the Arab world, since the seemingly powerful Arab armies were defeated by the weak, second class Jews - who then took up residence in the very heart of the Arab world, dividing it in half.
As long as the honor/shame culture exists, real peace is not possible.
The UAE, by publicly embracing Israel, is puncturing not only the Arab world's united anti-Israel front, but the entire honor/shame culture as well.
Honor/shame relies to a large degree on the ability to lie - both to others and to oneself. This is because the honor/shame society is more centered on appearances than on truth. As long as one can hold oneself high, and everyone else is willing to play along, the facts aren't what is important. Lying is necessary to maintain honor when reality doesn't agree, and to avoid humiliation. Lying is part of the culture.
Another aspect of the honor/shame culture (although not exclusive to it) is the inability to admit mistakes. This blocks nearly all progress. People and societies grow from acknowledging mistakes and learning from them, but the fear of being shamed usually is much worse in the Arab world than repeating the mistake.
The system works quite well as long as everyone plays along, and as long as those who don't play can be shamed and marginalized by the system. But we now live in an interconnected world, and in the Western world it is embarrassing to be caught in a lie or to be revealed to be a hypocrite.
I always thought the honor/shame mentality was built in, and it could never be changed. I felt that since it was immovable, the West should not pander to it but to use it to advantage, to shame Arabs by confronting them with their own moral failures in public. This has worked to an extent - honor killings and female genital mutilation are now considered shameful in the Arab world in no small part because Arabs do not want to fall short of Western standards of morality, and it is shameful to defend such practices.
But the UAE deal with Israel has the potential not of only remaking the Middle East, but of seriously damaging the honor/shame culture altogether.
The UAE is telling the rest of the Arab world the truth: Israel is here to stay. It is powerful. It is modern and advanced. Pretending that we will defeat it is ridiculous. Jews are not evil. We can gain a lot more by partnering with it rather than opposing it. The Palestinians are, to a large extent, responsible for their own problems.
The honor/shame culture can paper over some truths when everyone knows and plays the game, but it cannot ignore what one of its most powerful players says. The usual response to Western criticism is screaming "how dare you insult us!" which often results in the Westerners backing down to show respect for Arab culture. But when fellow Arabs drop truth bombs on their brethren, the explosion is huge - and can cause a chain reaction.
Already, other corners of the Arab world are gingerly discussing what the world would look like if they, too, recognized or normalized relations with Israel. There is almost a palpable relief at not having to continue to lie to themselves. Truth is contagious, and taking responsibility for mistakes is empowering.
Look at this Lebanese video released by MEMRI where a former minister drops more truth bombs on a shocked hostess:
This sort of thing is happening all over the Arab world today, and it was unthinkable a mere month ago.
The Palestinians and Iranians are trying mightily to shame the UAE and to pre-emptively shame any other Arab nations from following suit. But that weapon is losing its effectiveness more and more every day.
In some ways, the UAE's normalization and willingness to deal with the truth is much bigger than peace with Egypt or Jordan was. It has the potential to completely remake the Middle East - and to change the mindset of hundreds of millions of people.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
A Norwegian lawmaker has nominated Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for 2021 for helping broker a deal between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, the second time he has put forward the U.S. president for the honor.
Thousands of people are eligible to nominate candidates for the Nobel Peace Prize, including members of parliaments and governments, university professors and past laureates.
The Norwegian Nobel Committee, which decides on the award, declined to comment.
"It is for his contribution for peace between Israel and the UAE. It is a unique deal," Christian Tybring-Gjedde, a member of parliament for the right-wing Progress Party, told Reuters.
Tybring-Gjedde, who nominated Trump for the 2019 award for his diplomatic efforts with North Korea, said he also nominated him this year because of the U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq.
Last year Trump said he deserved to be awarded the Peace Prize for his work on North Korea and Syria, but he complained he probably would never get the honor. Former President Barack Obama, a nemesis of Trump, won the prize in 2009 just months into his first term in office.
Nominations for this year’s award closed on Jan. 31 and the winner will be announced on Oct. 9 in Oslo.
By thinking out of the box and looking at the world though a prism untainted by the swamp, the Trump administration accomplished what previous American administrations could not. It had bucked politically insurmountable odds to foster cooperation between historical enemies and in so doing, brought political stability and economic opportunity to two volatile regions.
So will Trump receive a Nobel Peace Prize? Don’t hold your breath. The highbrow folks who sit on that worthless Norwegian Committee revile Trump. They are an integral part the swamp, viewing the world through an elitist prism that is detached from reality. These are the same people who gave a Nobel Peace Prize to the now deceased gangster of Ramallah, Yassir Arafat, a revolting figure who was arguably the most notorious terrorist of the last century and whose word wasn’t worth the paper it was written on.
In October 2009, the Nobel Committee awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to Barack Obama, barely nine months after the former freshman senator and community organizer assumed office as America’s 44th president. Between January 2009 and October 2009, Obama hadn’t a single foreign policy success. In fact, during his tenure, Obama’s foreign policy was marked by failure and fecklessness. He downplayed the ascendancy of ISIS, vacillated when Syria used poison gas against its own people, emboldened Iran through policies of appeasement, ignored human rights abuses in Turkey and China, and shut down a very promising investigation into Hezbollah’s transnational criminal enterprise.
The Nobel committee’s mindset mirrors that of the establishment media, which detests Trump and operates as the propaganda arm of the Democratic Party. That is why the establishment media buried the Israel-UAE peace accord beneath deprecatory articles on Trump and tributes to his challenger, despite the deal’s enormous positive implications for regional peace and stability. And that is why members of the press corps directed off-topic questions at Kushner, O'Brien and Grenell when the trio issued a press conference on the Serbia-Kosovo-Israel breakthrough. Grenell, though, would have none of it and angrily responded to a journalist’s off topic question by dryly asking the journalist if he could find Serbia or Kosovo on a map. But Grenell’s tongue lashing didn’t stop there. He deprecatingly noted that there was a “crisis in journalism,” and that “people aren’t listening to you (journalists) anymore.”
So despite his achievements in forging peace on two continents, Trump will not receive the Nobel Peace Prize. But judging by the lowly caliber of the people issuing that prize, their dishonest media allies, and their skewed world outlook, the lack of committee recognition, though contemptible, should be viewed as a positive thing.
They will say Trump in ineligible for Nobel because Obama already made Peace in the Middle East. https://t.co/2LTVHQ5ont
The signing ceremony of the Abraham Accord between Israel and the UAE will take place on September 15 in Washington, the White House confirmed on Tuesday. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will represent Israel, the Foreign Affairs Minister and the crown prince’s brother, Abdullah bin Zayed will represent the UAE.
Netanyahu said he is “proud to be going to Washington next week at US President Donald Trump’s invitation, to participate in the historic ceremony in the White House, celebrating establishing a peace treaty between Israel and the United Arab Emirates.”
Last week, Israel and the United Arab Emirates started discussions to open embassies in each other’s countries, during a high-level government meeting in Abu Dhabi.
The Israeli delegation headed by National Security Adviser Meir Ben-Shabbat, together with his American counterpart Robert O’Brien, White House special advisers Jared Kushner and Avi Berkowitz, and others arrived on the first-ever direct flight by an Israeli airline from Israel to the UAE. The El Al plane, bearing an Israeli flag, was also the first-ever Israeli flight over Saudi Arabia.
The Arab League was founded in a large part in response to Zionism. Its first major actions were to gain consensus among Arab states for boycotting Jews in Israel and even though Arab states have always disagreed strongly about virtually everything, they could always pretend to agree how much they hate Israel, so the Arab League was able to maintain a pretense of unity through its many anti-Israel resolutions.
Zionism may be what destroys the Arab League.
This morning, the PLO "foreign minister" Dr. Riyad Malki gave a speech to the Arab League where he expressed the Palestinian frustration at the lack of response by the Arab League to the UAE's decision to make Israel an ally.
But he went further than that.
Malki said that usually any joint Arab actions at the Arab League supporting the Palestinians were "only for show, not implementation...But there was neither commitment nor respect for these decisions."
He called this "duplicity" and said that it put "Palestine" in many embarrassing situations, particularly when non-Arab countries would note that what they hear behind closed doors from Arab governments contradict their Arab League commitments (speaking of payments to the PLO and "supporting Jerusalem.")
"We would boast about the Arab resolutions," Malki said in his speech, "only to be told that those were nothing more than just ink on paper."
He explained that even asking for an extraordinary meeting of the Arab League to condemn the UAE proved strenuous. One country refused and asked for an ordinary meeting, and later refused to even add the Israel/UAE deal to the agenda, while another threatened to table an alternative communiqué from the one that the PLO would have written, expecting a rubber stamp as they always have gotten.
A frustrated Malki said, "How do we explain these acts? Are they determining what became acceptable or not for the Arab League meetings? Who defines this? Those with influence and money or who? Did Palestine go too far by asking for an extraordinary meeting or by adding an item to the agenda? Did Palestine cross pre-determined, but not declared, red lines?"
Malki then went on to ask whether the Arab League is even committed to its own Arab Peace Initiative of 2002. "Is this initiative for show? If so, we need to know that. Is it for implementation? If so, what do we do about those who violate it?"
He went on to say that unless the Arab League publicly opposes the UAE/Israel deal, the meeting would be considered to be blessing this deal, colluding with it or providing it with a cover. "This will not be accepted by the State of Palestine."
If the Arab League can no longer be relied on to consistently oppose and condemn Israel, the last fig leaf for its existence as a unified voice of the Arab world goes away.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
The New York Times has an interesting article about Israelis managing to harvest dates from the famous Judean date palm, planted with seeds that are over 2000 years old:
The plump, golden-brown dates hanging in a bunch just above the sandy soil were finally ready to pick.
They had been slowly ripening in the desert heat for months. But the young tree on which they grew had a much more ancient history — sprouting from a 2,000-year-old seed retrieved from an archaeological site in the Judean wilderness.
“They are beautiful!” exclaimed Dr. Sarah Sallon with the elation of a new mother, as each date, its skin slightly wrinkled, was plucked gently off its stem at a sunbaked kibbutz in southern Israel.
They were tasty, too, with a fresh flavor that gave no hint of their two-millenium incubation period. The honey-blonde, semi-dry flesh had a fibrous, chewy texture and a subtle sweetness.
These were the much-extolled but long-lost Judean dates, and the harvest this month was hailed as a modern miracle of science.
Where was the seed found again?
Hannah’s seed, which came from an ancient burial cave in Wadi el-Makkukh near Jericho, now in the West Bank, was carbon dated to between the first and fourth centuries B.C.E., becoming one of the oldest known seeds to have ever been germinated.
The phrase "now in the West Bank" is awkward - did the cave somehow move from Judea to the "West Bank"? But for the Times to more accurately say "now called the West Bank" would be problematic for a paper that chose to embrace that term only in the 1970s.
No one had ever heard of the "West Bank" before the 1950s, yet that Jordanian name is now considered the most accurate for media like the New York Times while "Judea" is considered a right-wing Israeli term created to supplant it. Articles like this are awkward precisely because they highlight that the land has always been associated with Jews, not "Palestinian" Arabs.
Luckily, the scientists who managed this remarkable feat aren't bound by the political correctness of using a brand new term for a Jewish historic area:
Ancient Judea was ideally placed between North Africa and Asia, along major trade routes, and the Romans, who traded all over the Mediterranean, could have brought western varieties with them to pollinate the older varieties from the east.
“Putting it simply, what do we find?” Dr. Sallon said. “The story of ancient Israel and the Jewish people, of diasporas, trade routes and commerce throughout the Middle East.”
(h/t Charlie)
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
I recently reported that Harvard University named serial liar and PLO propagandist Saeb Erakat to be a Fellow, teaching diplomacy this year.
The Clarion Project looked at what foreign nations give donations to American universities and colleges. It is no secret that many countries give lots of money to influence US curricula. Most give to several universities.
The Palestinian Authority itself only gave money to one university in the US.
Guess which one.
Even though the Palestinian Authority gets virtually all of its money from the West and it is always begging for more, somehow it found in its budget $2.6 million to give to Harvard. And by some sort of crazy coincidence, now Saeb Erakat is free to push his lies on today's Harvard students.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
Israel and the United Arab Emirates will sign their historic deal normalizing relations at a White House ceremony on September 15, a senior White House official confirmed to The Times of Israel on Tuesday.
US officials said senior delegations from both countries would likely be led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Emirati Foreign Minister Abdullah bin Zayad, the brother of the Abu Dhabi crown prince.
The officials, who were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity, said the ceremony would either be held on the South Lawn, the Rose Garden or inside, depending on weather.
Netanyahu’s office issued a statement in the premier’s name on Tuesday evening confirming his attendance. “I am proud to travel to Washington next week, at the invitation of President Trump, and to attend the historic White House ceremony establishing the peace agreement between Israel and the United Arab Emirates,” the prime minister said.
Numerous Arab diplomats, including from countries that don’t have formal ties with Israel, are expected to attend the ceremony, in a bid to show that the agreement enjoys widespread support, the Walla news site reported.
The ceremony will come just a month after the agreement to establish full diplomatic relations was announced on August 13. The deal delivered a key foreign policy victory to US President Donald Trump as he seeks reelection, and reflected a changing Middle East in which shared concerns about archenemy Iran have largely overtaken traditional Arab support for the Palestinians.
According to Walla, Israel and the US are still working toward a diplomatic breakthrough with another Arab state before the signing ceremony, though it is unclear if this will be possible.
What do you think would happen if President Donald Trump decided to meet with the family of a shooting victim, and it turned out his father was a neo-Nazi? It would be front-page news in the country’s leading newspapers and be discussed pretty much continuously on CNN and MSNBC. Whatever the other circumstances surrounding the incident, such a meeting would be rightly seen as showing Trump’s indifference to hate.
What do you think would happen if his opponent, former Vice President Joe Biden, did something just like that? The mainstream media would ignore it. Those who brought up the issue or even asked questions about it would be branded as “right-wing” provocateurs or denounced as trying to divide the country on race.
That was what happened when Biden met last week with the family of Jacob Blake, an African-American man who was left paralyzed when he was shot by a police officer in Kenosha, Wis., after resisting arrest.
Since the death of George Floyd, all incidents involving police shooting African-Americans have become the focus of intense scrutiny as the nation debates the questions of racism and alleged police brutality. Outrage about these shootings has propelled the Black Lives Matter movement to the center of public attention, as well as leading to protests, riots and violence.
In the days since the shooting of their son, both of Blake’s parents had made many public appearances. His father, Jacob Blake Sr., spoke at the March on Washington on Aug. 28 at which Dr. Martin Luther King’s 1963 event was commemorated. In his remarks, he pronounced America “guilty” of racism and other crimes in a speech that was widely broadcast and published in leading newspapers. Indeed, as The Washington Post put it, the Blake family represented the feelings of all African-Americans.
But a few days later, when the elder Blake’s views became known to the public, the same news media that was transfixed by his angry speech in Washington lost interest in him.
Does the level of the Kinneret have anything to do with the prospects for peace in the Middle East? Thomas Friedman would like you to think that it does.
Friedman has been the foreign affairs op-ed columnist for The New York Times since 1995. That means that for the past 25 years, he has enjoyed one of the most prominent and influential platforms in public discourse. Not only are his columns read by movers and shakers around the world, but he is also frequently interviewed on national television and radio shows, and invited to speak at major public forums and events hosted by Jewish organizations that should know better.
I say “that should know better” because in his writings about Israel, Friedman sometimes crosses the line in ways that would earn other pundits pariah status in the Jewish world. In 2004, he wrote that Israel “had George Bush under house arrest in the Oval Office.” In 2011, Friedman claimed that the standing ovations Israel’s prime minister received in Congress were “bought and paid for by the Israel lobby.” In 2013, he asserted that “many American lawmakers [will] do whatever the Israel lobby asks them to do in order to garner Jewish votes and campaign donations.”
Despite those Pat Buchanan-like sentiments, Friedman has managed to maintain his status as a prominent opinion-shaper. Partly that’s because as long as he has the imprimatur of The New York Times, he is considered legitimate. Partly it’s because every once in a while, Friedman writes something mildly critical of the Palestinian Arab leadership; that gives him a fig leaf to pretend that he is “even-handed” and not an Israel-basher.
So, Friedman is taken seriously in many quarters when he periodically proffers some new Arab-Israeli “peace plan.” Since all of his plans involve Israel retreating to its nine-miles-wide pre-1967 borders—what diplomat Abba Eban called the “Auschwitz borders”—the only way Friedman can pitch his latest version as “new” is to come up with some new reason why the plan is (supposedly) so urgent.
Earlier this year, Friedman wrote that climate change should be the urgent new factor in Mideast diplomacy. Mother Nature will overwhelm the various political and military conflicts, he declared. His proof? “In the summer of 2018, the Sea of Galilee was so low from droughts and water withdrawals for rising populations that it was threatening to become another saline lake, like the Dead Sea.”
The solution, according to Friedman, is to pressure Israel to permit the creation of a sovereign Palestinian state—and then Israel, Jordan and “Palestine” can form “a confederation of their sovereign entities based on sea and sun.”
Ironically, less than a year before Friedman unveiled his sea-and-sun plan, a headline in Ha’aretz (no doubt Friedman’s favorite Israeli newspaper, given its slant) announced: “Lake Kinneret Is the Fullest It’s Been in Five Years, and There’s More to Come.”
In a story about how the Palestinian Authority has watered down its criticism of the Israel/UAE agreement for a draft Arab League resolution, Reuters writes:
Announced on Aug. 13, the accord was the first such accommodation between an Arab country and Israel in more than 20 years, and was forged largely through shared fears of Iran.
This is one of those statements that seem so obvious to supposedly professional observers of the Middle East - and a little bit of thought shows it to be just as obviously false.
Yes, Israel and the Sunni Arab states in the Gulf have a shared interest in countering Iran. But that does not explain - at all! - the UAE's normalization with Israel. After all, Israel and most Gulf states have been quietly cooperating on security and intelligence for quite a long time now, and that can go on indefinitely. It isn't like Israel is going to tell the Arabs, "sorry, we won't help you defend yourself against Iran any more until you recognize us."
And the UAE could have gone the Egypt/Jordan route of a minimal recognition and a cold peace. So far, not only has the UAE made it clear that it wants a warm peace, but it has pushed back hard against Arab critics of the agreement.
Clearly, Iran is only one of many factors behind the UAE's actions.
The UAE wants to partner with Israel on business and banking initiatives. It wants to become a gateway for Israel to trade with the larger Arab world. It wants to take advantage of Israeli technology, especially water tech. It wants to share expertise on medical technologies. It wants Israeli tourists. It wants to attract branches of Israeli businesses as well as businesses that have been reluctant to go to the UAE because of the weakened but still official Arab League boycott. The UAE views itself as a progressive, tolerant Arab state and Israel is a natural partner. It wants to position itself for a time when oil is no longer enough, and Israel is a leader in energy tech. The UAE wants F-35s from the US. It is even possible that the UAE admires Israel's mix of religious and secular culture as a possible model for its own people.
There are probably a dozen more reasons real experts could come up with, as well as secret deals no one knows about that would be mutually beneficial for the two nations.
But one thing is certain: Iran is not even close to the main reason for the two countries to want to become full allies.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
[D]ozens of Christians [were] arrested in a co-ordinated series of raids by Revolutionary Guards targeting homes and house churches across three cities on June 30 and July 1.
At least 35 Christians were either interrogated or arrested on charges of “acting against national security by promoting Zionist Christianity” as part of the operation carried out in Tehran, Karaj and Malayer.
Promoting Zionist Christianity?
It turns out that Iran uses that charge routinely against converts from Islam to Christianity in Iran, along with some other charges. For example, in 2017 three Azerbaijani Christians and an Iranian Christian convert were sentenced by the Islamic Revolutionary Tribunal of Iran to ten years in prison each. The charges were " action against national security and the soft overthrow of the system through the promotion of Christianity" and "the propagation of Zionist Christianity."
This way, Iran can claim to be tolerant of all religions and still arrest Christians under the excuse that they are really Zionists.
Mohabat, the Iranian Christian News Agency, has been routinely reporting on these arrests. Lately, Iranian judges have been imposing astronomical bail terms on arrested Christians, up to $137,000.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.
This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For 20 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.
Steve Kramer: Israel finally takes the initiative
-
[image: Steve Kramer: Israel finally takes the initiative] Steve Kramer:
Israel finally takes the initiative IsraelSeen.com
Steve Kramer: Israel finally ta...
Shana Tova – Happy New Year!
-
Wishing all our readers celebrating Rosh HaShana תשפ”ה a happy, healthy and
peaceful new year which will bring the release of our hostages.
The post S...
Shana Tova – Happy New Year!
-
Wishing all our readers celebrating Rosh HaShana תשפ”ה a happy, healthy and
peaceful new year which will bring the release of our hostages.
The post S...
Jews in Iran condemn Nasrallah assassination
-
The Jewish communities in Tehran and Isfahan have both issued statements
mourning the assassination of the Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah. The
stateme...
Shanah Tovah
-
[image: Dry Bones cartoon, Hezbollah, Rosh Hashanah, Houthis, Yemen, War,
Iran, Lebanon, Israel,]
We are energized as we fight back!.
* * *
*Please make a...
FEMA’s DEI Crippled Hurricane Helene Response
-
“I don’t know that anybody could be fully prepared for the amount of
flooding and landslides that they are experiencing right now,” FEMA
Administrator D...
Al-Aqsa as "exclusive property"
-
In his UN General Assembly meeting address, Mahmoud Abbas said:
*Al-Aqsa Mosque and its surroundings, ladies and gentlemen, are the
exclusive property of...
The transparent mob attack on the Jewish Chronicle
-
Make no mistake, the Jewish Chronicle made a huge error in trusting a
source they should not have done. But as embarrassing as this episode may
be – the ...
One Choice: Fight to Win
-
Yesterday Israel preempted a potentially disastrous attack by Hezbollah on
the center of the country. Thirty minutes before launch time, our aircraft
destr...
Yom Hashoah 5784 – 2024
-
Israel’s Yom Hashoah began at sundown this evening with the annual ceremony
at Yad Vashem with torches lit in memory of the 6 million Jewish victims of
the...
Closing Jews Down Under Website
-
With a heavyish heart I am closing down the website after ten years.
It is and it isn’t an easy decision after 10 years of constant work. The
past...
‘Test & Trace’ is a mirage
-
Lockdown II thoughts: Day 1 Opposition politicians have been banging on
about the need for a ‘working’ Test & Trace system even more loudly than
the govern...
Thursday, September 10, 2020
Elder of Ziyon
