Amnesty UK tweeted this:
Here’s another picture of Mr. Kapos laughing as he equates the Holocaust to the “Nakba.”
Amnesty-UK is publicizing a child Holocaust survivor who marches in anti-Israel demonstrations, calling the Gaza War a “genocide.” The only reason they want to promote him is to make the point that as a Holocaust survivor, Kapos knows what genocide is and has a particular moral authority to be able to describe Israel’s actions as the most heinous war crimes.
But if Holocaust survivors have a unique perspective on genocide - and they do, having survived the paradigm of all genocides - then what about the 99.9% of living Holocaust survivors who support Israel, and who recognize Hamas and October 7 as being the closest modern equivalent to Nazis? If Holocaust survivors have an important perspective on the matter, why is Amnesty ignoring the feelings of nearly all of them and promoting a fringe figure among them?
Clearly Amnesty doesn’t consider most Holocaust survivors’ opinions to be important.
This means two things:
Since Amnesty says that those who support Israel and its war against Hamas to be advocating genocide, that means that Amnesty is calling the people who escaped the gas chambers, and whose parents and siblings were murdered in a real genocide, to now be supporting genocide themselves. They found a “good” Holocaust survivor, but all the rest are the genocidal Zionists who love to see civilians killed, in Amnesty’s interpretation of a war on a terror group. To accuse Holocaust survivors of supporting genocide is as antisemitic as possible., but there is no other way to explain Amnesty’s position.
Their choice to elevate this one survivor as a paradigm of virtue while ignoring or disparaging the vast majority reveals that they don’t actually respect Stephen Kapos.. They are using him as a prop, not as someone that should be seriously listened to. If they cared what Holocaust survivors really thought, they would be quoting their opinion of Hamas, of Iran, of Hezbollah, of the Houthis, and of all the modern terrorists who want to finish Hitler’s job.
All Holocaust survivors remember when the word “Palestinians” meant “Jews.” When they were growing up, there was next to no Palestinian nationalism - there was Arab nationalism. Syria and Jordan were competing to be the leaders of the Levant Arabs in the years after 1948; no one was interested in a Palestinian state - not even the Arabs who lived under the Palestinian mandate themselves.
Holocaust survivors experienced a world before the myth of an ancient Arab Palestine took hold. They know the truth. This is why Amnesty disrespects them - they know too much.
To Amnesty, the Holocaust is not a lesson for them to learn from. It is only a lesson for its victims and their descendants. It wasn’t a genocide, exactly, but a giant classroom for Jews to learn to behave themselves and not act like Nazis. The rest of the world, the world that let the Holocaust happen, are now the judges that determine whether Jews fighting for their lives are crossing the line or need to be taught Remedial Holocaust 102. To Amnesty, the Holocaust is a prop meant to be trotted out when it is convenient for them to hurl the most hateful accusations against Jews and then use fringe, mentally ill Jews as a cover to protect themselves from being accused of antisemitism.
No one else can be compared to the Nazis but Jews, in Amnesty’s universe.
This tweet, alone, exposes the cynicism and hypocrisy of this supposedly “human rights” organization. And, yes, the implications of this tweet are pure Jew-hatred.
|
Reclaiming the Covenant on America's 250th (May 2026) "He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024) PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022) |
|
Elder of Ziyon








