Wednesday, April 08, 2026

From Ian:

Seth Mandel: Iron Dome and the ‘America First’ Left
The problem is that it isn’t true that Iron Dome is none of our concern. The America First left is thus living a lie—the very same lie that America First rightists tell themselves. The Horseshoe Theory strikes again.

There are two kinds of benefits that Iron Dome funding brings to America: direct and indirect. An example of an indirect benefit: It is an immensely cost-effective way to prevent escalation in the Middle East, since it allows Israel to absorb rocket attacks that would otherwise necessitate an overwhelming military response. And preventing escalation in the Middle East saves American lives.

One theory behind funding Iron Dome, then, is: It is good to save American lives.

But the indirectness of that particular benefit opens space for naysayers to claim otherwise (though it would be surprising if they actually believed such claims). So if that were where the argument ended, AOC and Khanna and others could claim some kind of “both sides” stalemate in which two legitimate but unprovable claims must coexist.

But it does not end there. In fact, it begins there.

As one Congressional Research Service report on Iron Dome explains succinctly: “In March 2014, the United States and Israeli governments signed a coproduction agreement to enable components of the Iron Dome system to be manufactured in the United States, while also providing the U.S. Missile Defense Agency (MDA) with full access to what had been proprietary Iron Dome technology.”

Let’s take the first part first, because it’s so simple even an anti-Zionist could understand it. For about a decade, Raytheon’s plant in Arizona was the critical core of Iron Dome parts production in America. In November 2025, a new plant in Arkansas came online, moving even more of the process from Israel to America. Now, the manufacture of missile components for Iron Dome interceptors is mostly an American process. In other words, just like much of what is called “aid” to Israel, the money is spent on the U.S. economy and in fortifying American manufacturing. Along with the new Arkansas facility, Reuters reports, Raytheon received a $1.25 billion contract to supply Israel.

American jobs, American money, American manufacturing—if these are unimportant to Iron Dome’s critics, they should say so. Ignoring them entirely is an act of profound bad faith.

Meanwhile, access to the missile-defense technology is its own return-on-investment, since the U.S. gets to see data from the tech’s deployment in wartime scenarios. So: Iran fires missiles at Israel, and the U.S. sees what works and what doesn’t without its own civilians being the live targets.

Which is why, in the end, opposition to Iron Dome in the U.S. generally takes an ideological, and not a mathematical or practical, primary basis. One cannot argue that there are no benefits to the U.S.; one can only argue that those benefits—investment in the U.S. economy, job creation, a steady boost to domestic manufacturing, and of course lives saved—aren’t meaningful.
From first intercept to 10,000 combat intercepts: Iron Dome turns 15-analysis
On April 7, 2011 at 6.20PM I was in the southern city of Sderot when the incoming siren blared. Hamas had fired a Grad missile towards the city of Ashkelon. Running to the safe room, I heard a sound that was different than a rocket slamming into the ground-it was the first interception by the now famous Iron Dome missile defense system.

Air defense soldiers gave the call sign “Alpha”- the signal for a successful first intercept of a rocket toward Israel. That interception, 15 years ago today, has changed the face of active defense around the world- especially here in Israel where it fundamentally redefined Israel’s defensive doctrine and its ability to counter rocket threats.

The system has logged more than 10,000 combat intercepts and sustained success rates exceeding 90%.

“Over the past 15 years, the system has changed the face of the battlefield and shielded Israel’s civilians from relentless threats coming from multiple adversaries. Iron Dome is a first-order strategic asset and a central pillar of Israel’s national defense doctrine,” said Prof. Yuval Steinitz, Chairman, Rafael Advanced Defense Systems.

Hilla Haddad Chmelnik was on the Iron Dome’s development team during her service in the Israel Air Force and recalled her first encounter with the system.

“I met Iron Dome a year before it became operational. It was in advanced development of the first interceptor batteries. I was in the Air Force, at the test range, and Rafael and MAFAT came to the Air Force to make it operational with an acceptance test. We had to think: how do we check the system and make sure it works well?”

The primary contractor for the development of the Iron Dome is Rafael Advanced Defense System. The MMR radar is developed by ELTA, a subsidiary of the Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), and the command and control system is developed by mPrest.

Its development was completed in roughly two and a half years, an exceptional engineering feat by any international standard.

“It immediately became a different kind of project, a sort of paperless project, because it was developed so fast. It was extraordinary because it required a whole new way of thinking about how an interception system works. It changed the way we test systems,” she told Defense & Tech by The Jerusalem Post.

The first test of the system took place in February 2011 and two months later the first interception took place.

“The interception happened an hour before my wedding in Herzliya,” Haddad Chmelnik recalled. “It was a double celebration. It was amazing.”
Strategies to stop antizionist abuse
The most effective and powerful analogies are always the simplest and easiest to picture.

And during an empowering 90-minute presentation at Sydney’s Dover Heights Synagogue late last month on how to identify, and fight back against, the dangerous tsunami of antizionism that’s enabling the spread of hatred against Jews, Josh Dabelstein – the Australian chapter coordinator of the Movement Against Antizionism (MAAZ) – delivered an absolute beauty.

At the event organised by the Zionist Council of NSW, Dabelstein, who has a unique and deep knowledge of antizionism because he was once an antizionist himself, relayed to the audience of more than 100 this most potent of paragraphs:

“If we think about the highway to Jew hate, one lane is antijudaism, the middle lane is antisemitism and the other lane is antizionism. We [society and the law] blocked those first two lanes. That doesn’t mean that there are still people swerving all over the road. Some people do just hate Jews, right? But the one lane that allows them through today and emboldens them, provides them a permission structure and allows society to really spread all of this stuff, is antizionism.”

To understand why Dabelstein considers antizionism the single greatest threat facing Jews in the Diaspora today, it helps to understand how MAAZ frames the history of Jew hatred as a whole. At his Dover Heights shule address, he explained how those “three lanes on a highway” are related, but also quite distinct, with each associated with different “permission structures”, meaning they utilise a system of language, beliefs and authorities that makes the harm that the protagonists cause feel justified and allows people to adopt positions they once would have vehemently rejected.

Antijudaism, the oldest form, targeted Jews through religion – which is now illegal. Antisemitism targets Jews through race and ethnicity – which is also now illegal.

But antizionism – the dominant form today – targets Jews through demonising the Jewish state – disguising the hate as political criticism, or for social justice. Josh Dabelstein speaking at the event, presented by the Zionist Council of NSW.

In each case, he argued, the hatred operates not by engaging honestly with its stated target – Judaism, Semitism or Zionism – but by inventing a phantom proxy and loading it with libels.

“They take all the things that they hate and they shove them in that word.”

In the antizionist era, today’s libels – genocide, apartheid, colonialism – are directed at the Jewish state, are repeated ad nauseam and, Dabelstein said, “are elevated to fact status through pseudo-academia and institutional adoption.”

The conspiracy theories have shifted accordingly: Israel’s President Isaac Herzog is likened to Hitler during his recent Australian visit; and stigmatising Jews is now “simply achieved through misusing the word Zionist”.

What makes all forms of Jew hatred dangerous, Dabelstein said, is precisely that each presents as fashionable in the context they arise, before eventually being revealed as violent systems that produce violent ends.

While antizionism presents itself as anti-colonial, anti-racist and humanitarian, the violence it invites is moralised the same way it was in medieval and Nazi Europe.


David Collier: The Return of the Blood Libel – and How Sky News Amplified It
Over the centuries, few accusations have proven as persistent or as dangerous as the blood libel – the claim that Jews murder children to fulfil some dark and necessary ritual.

The details have shifted to suit the times, but the underlying idea has remained remarkably consistent: that Jews, by their very nature, are capable of harming children in ways that ordinary morality cannot explain.

Today, the language has changed. The religious framing has largely disappeared, but the accusation itself has not. It reappears in modern form as claims that Jews, recast as Israelis or Zionists, deliberately target children, shooting, starving or torturing them as part of a wider project of domination and expansion.

A Version for the Modern Age
Towards the end of March, claims circulated that IDF soldiers tortured a two-year-old toddler. It is an accusation designed to provoke immediate outrage, repeated with little meaningful scrutiny.

No independently verifiable evidence has been produced to support it. Instead, the claim spreads through emotive language, detached from any reliable chain of evidence.

This is the modern repackaging of the blood libel – trading on shock and relying on audiences reacting before asking whether it is true.

In the social media age, such claims are routinely amplified by antisemitic commentators, often with the support of state-aligned outlets in Qatar, Russia, Turkey and Iran.

As seen repeatedly – including last year’s widely circulated but unsupported claims that Israel was deliberately starving children – the pattern is familiar. The claims go viral regardless of the evidence.

The outcome is also familiar: the dehumanisation of Jews – a necessary step in framing violence against them as not only legitimate, but morally justified.

What should never happen in such circumstances is for a mainstream news outlet to lend credibility to the claim.

That is precisely what makes the actions of those like Sky News so indefensible.

The Arrested Father and Return of the Child
Here is what we know:
On Thursday 19 March, a Palestinian man in Gaza approached IDF troops at the “yellow line” border area. He was repeatedly instructed to stop but continued advancing.

The man was accompanied by his twenty-one-month-old son, Karim Abu Nassar. After issuing warning shots, and possibly wounding the father, the soldiers detained them.

The IDF stated that the man was affiliated with Hamas and had participated in the attacks of 7 October, based on information obtained during questioning.

The soldiers assumed temporary responsibility for the child while arrangements were made to return him to family members. During that time, the child was reportedly given food and received medical attention.

Approximately ten hours later, the child was transferred to representatives of the Red Cross. Footage of the handover was subsequently released, and during the event, the toddler was described as “happy and healthy”.

The Red Cross did not take the child to hospital – but instead arranged for his return to family.


Jewish Community of Porto adopts the word anti-Zionism instead of antisemitism
The official communications of the Jewish Community of Porto have just changed. The word antisemitism has been replaced by anti-Zionism.

The challenge accepted by the community was launched on JNS by Daniel Friedman, a renowned professor of political science at Touro University in New York.

He wrote that he is tired of seeing anti-Jewish hatred grow while its promoters simply say: “I am not an antisemite. I am anti-Zionist.” It is repeated so often, with such confidence, that it has begun to function like a shield, like a way to redirect the charge without confronting the substance.

For years, the response has been to insist that the distinction is false and to argue that anti-Zionism is simply the latest form of antisemitism. Now, Friedman says “the debate has grown tired, circular and strangely disconnected from what is actually happening in the world,” so “let us adopt their language and call it anti-Zionism.”

After all, Zion is not merely the name of a modern state. The prophet Isaiah records God’s words: “And I say to Zion: You are My people.” Zion is not just a place. Zion is a people. And so, anti-Zionist, according to the Bible, means anti-Jewish.”

Tragically, it is almost unsurprising when Jews are attacked across the globe in the name of anti-Zionism. These are Jews living their lives thousands of miles from Israel. Synagogues in the Diaspora are not Israeli embassies; nevertheless, communities have to pay fortunes for the security of their prayer rooms or their members might die while praying.

Chanukah celebrations on Australian beaches don’t take place in military installations in the Negev, but Chabad rabbis are shot as if they were in war trenches. Museums are not government offices, but in the United States and Western Europe, peaceful visitors have been brutally machine-gunned. Because Israel is destroying the terrorist movements, they attack Jewish emergency vehicles in London that are created to save lives.

Many Israelis have asked for Portuguese nationality for a variety of reasons. Then, a “Palestinian issue” from the local political mainstream imposed the end of a law in favor of Jews and the country for which they could fight. Synagogues and museums full of life, history films and art galleries were treated by the media system with the word “opulence.” The salaries that the community paid for a decade and a half to its Israeli religious leader were stolen by the state, which was not satisfied with the decisions of the competent community bodies.

Jewish philanthropists like Patrick Drahi, a French-Israeli investor with interests in media and telecoms; Uzbek-born diamond magnate Lev Leviev; and the Sephardic Kadoorie family of Iraq were treated as mere beggars desperately in need of a passport. The granddaughter of the “Portuguese Dreyfus” and daughter of a Jewish mother was treated as “non-Jewish” by the police, and her house was searched because of alleged “suitcases of money” that never existed.

To complement all this anti-Zionist shame, the Jews of Porto were listed in newspapers, the synagogue was vandalized with “apartheid” inscriptions, and the Hamas embassy in Lisbon was inaugurated with a painting of the Middle East where the Jewish state does not appear.
Dublin venue reconsidering staging Oct. 7 play
The National Concert Hall in Dublin is reconsidering a planned staged reading of the play “Oct. 7,” following objections to its inclusion in a fundraising event for Magen David Adom, Israel’s national emergency medical service.

The venue said it is “considering all aspects of this matter” after learning that the fundraiser would include the play, written by Irish writers Phelim McAleer and Ann McElhinney, based on verbatim accounts from survivors of the Hamas-led terrorist attacks in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.

The reading is planned as part of a May 11 event hosted by former Irish justice minister Alan Shatter. The fundraiser was previously canceled and then reinstated after intervention by the venue’s board, according to local reporting.

McElhinney said the production has faced repeated resistance in Ireland. “We had wanted to bring you the great news that the Oct/ 7 play was finally going to Ireland. We had arranged a staged reading at the National Concert Hall, a prestigious venue for such a historic play,” she stated. “But now the NCH says they are ‘reconsidering’ the booking upon hearing it will include the Oct. 7 play, because some are calling it political. This is wrong. The play is verbatim—pure journalism.”

“It consists of Jewish voices about Israel’s darkest day, with no editorializing,” she said.
David Schwimmer Says Wireless ‘Disgraced Itself’ by Booking Ye, Calls Rapper a ‘Hate-Mongering Bigot’
David Schwimmer has some strong opinions about Ye (formerly Kanye West) and Wireless Festival, which was canceled Tuesday (April 7) after the controversial rapper was booked as this year’s headliner.

In a lengthy letter posted to Instagram on Monday (April 6), the Friends star, who is Jewish, praised Pepsi, PayPal and Diageo for pulling out as sponsors of Wireless 2026 before the entire event was canceled. “It’s great to see companies with moral clarity,” Schwimmer began. “Unlike Wireless and [promoter] Festival Republic, they decided not to platform an artist who became one of the most recognizable hate-mongering bigots in the world.”

The actor went on to slam the festival for booking Ye in the first place, even after the hip-hop star spent years championing hateful anti-Jewish rhetoric before taking out a full-page Wall Street Journal ad in January apologizing for his actions and blaming his behavior on a brain injury. As Schwimmer pointed out, “Ye’s apologized before, only to retract that apology and double down on his virulent hatred of Jewish people.”

“An apology letter is just that: Words on paper,” he continued, writing that Wireless had “disgraced itself” by inviting Ye to perform. “An advertisement, generating publicity before a concert tour. It does not erase years of abuse. I believe in forgiveness, but it takes much more than this. Then again, I do not profit from his appearing at Wireless.”

The Hollywood star also name-checked Lauryn Hill and Travis Scott, who appeared on stage at Ye’s show at SoFi Stadium, as well as CeeLo Green and Don Toliver, who are featured on Ye’s new album, Bully. Calling them “artists who seem to shrug off [Ye’s] history of rabid antisemitism,” Schwimmer went on to question why other brands such as Budweiser, Beat Box Beverages, Drip Water and Big Green Coach hadn’t pulled out of Wireless upon finding out about the 2026 headliner.

“It’s fine for his famous pals to pat him on the back and say, ‘It’s all good,'” Schwimmer wrote of Ye. “But the community he has harmed most has no reason to trust his apology is authentic. If he was sincere, he would take action to repair the damage he caused.”

The actor added, “Until Ye demonstrates a commitment to building back trust — not only with the Jewish community, but with ALL the fans he left heartbroken and disappointed by his hateful rhetoric the last several years — he should not be granted a platform to perform.”
Kanye West should meet British Jews on their terms, not his
Kanye West has spoken. In response to the growing backlash around his appearance at Wireless Festival, he has offered the following:

A desire to “present a show of change.” A call for “unity, peace, and love.” An openness to meet with members of the Jewish community. An acknowledgment that “words aren’t enough.”

On the surface, it reads well, but then come the questions. Why now? Why wait until this moment, only after the headlines, after the outrage, after the sponsors have begun to walk away and he and has enablers are being hit where it truly hurts, in their pockets.

Why was this not the position before standing in front of 170,000 people in Los Angeles? Why was there no offer then to meet with the Jewish community there, to listen, to learn, to understand?

Why only now, when the cost of silence has finally begun to rise?

Because this is the challenge with apologies that arrive on the back of consequence. They may be sincere, but they are indistinguishable from strategy. Their timing is everything, a written apology the day before the announcement of a new record deal, an offer to meet when a major festival appearance is in doubt.

So let me suggest a different course of action, one that might actually result in something meaningful. Recognise the damage you have caused. Not in broad terms, but specifically, directly, without qualification. You know, actually make reference to releasing a song called “Heil Hitler”, selling merch adorned with a swastika, threatening the lives of Jews and spreading age old antisemitic tropes.

Then pull out of Wireless.

But come to London anyway, not to perform, but to listen.

Meet with members of the Jewish community, not for optics, not for photographs, not for validation, just to listen, learn and to understand the impact of what you have said, repeatedly, publicly, and without restraint.
Muslim leaders call for Kanye West Wireless ban amid antisemitism row
Muslim community leaders have joined growing calls for the cancellation of Kanye West’s Wireless gig – and urged ministers to step in if the festival’s organisers fail to act.

The event’s promoter, Melvin Benn, last night defended the decision to host the artist currently known as Ye, despite his record of persistent antisemitic rhetoric and the fact that he released a song entitled ‘Heil Hitler’ just months ago.

But in an unprecedented expression of solidarity, three senior imams have today called for action to stop the event.

Imam Qari Asim, co-chair of the British Muslim Network, told Jewish News: “The prospect of Kanye West being given a platform at Wireless Festival is deeply troubling given his repeated antisemitic and racist remarks.

“Antisemitism in any form is abhorrent and must be confronted firmly wherever it appears. Platforming individuals associated with hateful and divisive views about any community risks normalising hate and sending a harmful message that these attitudes are tolerated.

“British Jews, along with all other minority communities, must feel safe and protected in our society. Public platforms have a responsibility to uphold these values and ensure they do not contribute to division or harm. Wireless should seriously consider removing West from the bill.”

Leicester-based imam and chaplain Asim Hafiz added: “Wireless’s decision to continue with this booking should concern us all. This is not simply about entertainment but about the moral standards we uphold in public life. Someone associated with antisemitic rhetoric and Nazi imagery should not be normalised on a major public stage. At a time when Jewish communities already feel vulnerable, this sends the wrong message.

“The relevant authorities should reflect carefully on what this decision says about the standards we are prepared to defend as a society.”
Wireless festival cancelled after Kanye West blocked from travelling to UK
The Wireless festival has announced its cancellation after the government announced it would block Kanye West from entering the country, with the Home Secretary judging his presence in the UK would not be conducive to the public good.

After major backlash following the festival’s announcement on Monday 30 March that the rapper would be headlining the event, the Home Office had confirmed the rapper made an application to travel to the UK yesterday via an Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA).

Following a review, Shabana Mahmood decided to refuse permission.

The Wireless Festival subsequently announced cancellation of the entire three-day event, saying that refunds would be issued to all ticket-holders following the Home Office’s decision.

The decision was confirmed shortly after Downing Street had said “all options remain on the table” as the Home Office reviewed West’s permission to enter the UK to perform at Wireless Festival this summer.

It emerged that the rapper was initially granted a UK Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) – a mandatory digital permission for non-visa nationals visiting the UK for up to 6 months – because the Wireless Festival is on the permit-free festival list, allowing performers to travel to the UK as visitors.

But this decision was reviewed by the Home Office on Tuesday.

Jewish News revealed there was a strong consensus among ministers to block West from entering the UK to perform at the Wireless Festival in July.

It is understood that a previous decision taken by Mayor of London Sadiq Khan’s office to block a request from West to perform at the London Stadium this summer was taken into consideration.

The Mayor’s office had reached the decision to block the request to perform at the Olympic Stadium under his control because of community concerns and reputational risk to London.

Responding to the decision, the Community Security Trust (CST) said: “Preventing Ye from performing is a sensible outcome to what has been yet another bruising episode for British Jews, and ought to be entirely separate from the question of whether the festival as a whole goes ahead.

“Anti-Jewish hatred should have no place in society and cultural leaders have a role to play in ensuring that is the case. People who show genuine and meaningful remorse for previous antisemitic behaviour will always receive a sympathetic hearing from the Jewish community, but that process must come before this kind of public rehabilitation.”

A Jewish Leadership Council spokesperson said: “The government’s blocking of Kanye West’s entry into the UK recognises the deep disgust our country feels towards expressions of support for Nazi ideology. It is now incumbent on Wireless to recognise their massive error in judgement that has led us to this point.

“West did not merely share controversial opinions, he repeatedly commercialised his vile antisemitism. He should not be given a public platform in this country.”


John Anderson: An Unholy Alliance: Islam and Progressives Will Topple The West | Michael Youssef
In this special episode for Easter, John is joined by Michael Youssef to explore the complexities of political Islam and its impact on the West, challenging viewers to move beyond superficial secular answers and confront the deep-seated belief systems that continue to shape the contemporary political landscape. Youssef critiques the 'unholy alliance' between Islamism and progressivism, suggesting that this is a relationship of convenience that will end in betrayal and threatens to destroy the West.

The discussion examines the concept of 'third jihad', where democratic processes are being used to implement non-democratic legal codes such as Sharia law. It calls out the stark contrast between Islam and Christianity by examining their divergent views on power, the nature of God, and the foundation of human worth. Ultimately, this conversation is a call to rediscover our conviction in the Christian faith that originally gave birth to individual dignity and freedom.

Michael Youssef is a pastor, bestselling author, and internationally respected Bible teacher of 50 years, whose Middle Eastern heritage and background as a cultural anthropologist have equipped him to serve Christ through the international ministry organisation, Leading The Way. Youssef is the author of a number of books, including An Unholy Alliance: How Progressivism Brought about an Islamist Invasion and Never Give Up: Holding Fast to Biblical Truth in Times of Danger and Despair.

00:00 – Introduction
04:30 – Youssef background
09:00 – Origins democracy
13:30 – Bondi discussion
18:00 – Islam distinctions
23:00 – Strategy in West
28:00 – Feminism contradiction
33:00 – Muslim vs Islamist
38:00 – Sunni–Shia divide
43:00 – Education crisis
48:00 – Christianity vs Islam
53:00 – Rise atheism
58:00 – Progressives alliance
01:03:00 – Political vs spiritual
01:08:00 – Israel discussion
01:13:00 – Future outlook


Jeremy Boreing: They Say All Our Money Goes to Israel. The Data Says Otherwise | Ep. 6
Theo Von says "all of our f***ing money goes to Israel." Tucker Carlson says Bibi Netanyahu is "apparently in charge of the United States." And Candace Owens says Trump lives in a White House occupied by "Satanic Zionists."

The message is everywhere — on social media, on the biggest podcasts, across the right: Israel controls America. Our politicians are bought. Our military fights their wars. We are powerless.

But what if that's exactly what they want you to believe?

00:00 The "All of Our F***ing Money Goes to Israel" Narrative
01:33 The Data: How Much Has American Opinion Shifted?
04:11 The Real Message: You Are Powerless
05:48 Does Israel Actually Control America? The AIPAC Myth
09:44 Does America Fight Its Wars for Israel?
12:36 Why America Has Real Interests in the War with Iran
15:52 You'd Have to Believe Trump Is a Puppet
16:49 Tucker Carlson Is Wrong About Israel's Strategic Value
18:56 What America Actually Gets From Our Alliance
20:16 Israel Helped Save Our Downed Airman Over Easter
22:36 The Grifters Doesn't Hate Israel — They Hate America


Zoe Strimpel: How ‘anti-Zionism’ corrupted the arts | The Brendan O’Neill Show
Writer and historian Zoe Strimpel returns to The Brendan O’Neill Show to discuss her notorious encounter with Matthew Collings’s self-described ‘anti-Semitic art show’. Plus: they discuss her new book, Good Slut, and how the left and the right turned against women’s freedom




Trump tears into Tucker Carlson over Iran war claims: ‘Low-IQ person’
President Trump on Tuesday denied Tucker Carlson’s bombastic reporting that he was considering nuclear war on Iran, blasting the controversial commentator in a phone call with The Post.

“Tucker’s a low IQ person that has absolutely no idea what’s going on,” the president said. “He calls me all the time; I don’t respond to his calls. I don’t deal with him. I like dealing with smart people, not fools.”

Carlson in a Monday night post to X claimed that President Trump’s expletive-laden Easter morning Truth Social post that the US would soon bomb Iran’s power plants and bridges was “the first step toward nuclear war.”

“Christians need to understand where Trump is taking us,” Carlson wrote.

In Trump’s Sunday morning missive, he warned Iran to “open the F—–’ Strait, you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in Hell – JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah.”

Carlson called the language on Easter — a holy Christian holiday — “vile on every level.”

“How dare you speak that way on Easter morning to the country?” Carlson said in his podcast. “Who do you think you are? You’re tweeting out the f-word on Easter morning.”

Carlson in his podcast likened the US president to the antichrist, suggesting Trump is setting in motion nuclear war to provoke armageddon.

“Is it just a conventional escalation ladder in a badly thought out war … [or] could it be something bigger? Is it possible what you’re watching is a very stealthy yet incredibly effective attack on what, from a Christian perspective, is the true faith: belief in Jesus?” he said.

“Is it possible that the president sees this in bigger terms? Sees this as the fulfillment of something? An elevation of some higher office beyond president of the United States?”

As part of his evidence, he claimed that Trump infamously did not put his hand on the Bible when swearing into office in January 2025 because he rejects God’s authority.

“… Maybe he didn’t put his hand on the Bible because he affirmatively rejects what’s inside that book, and what’s inside that book are limits on human behavior,” he said. “Because if there’s one theme that spans all 66 books in the Christian Bible, it’s that you are not God and you cannot assume his powers.”

Hyping up his nuclear hypothesis, Carlson further urged White House and military staffers to resign if Trump directs them to launch a nuclear bomb on Iran.


New York City protest gaslights who really fosters violence
Early last week, entirely by accident, I came across a group of 50 or so Arab and Muslim activists hosting a press conference just a few steps away from New York City Hall. At the conference, most of which I videotaped with my iPhone, I saw something I’ve seen at anti-Israel, pro-Islamist rallies all the time—people demanding rights for themselves that they deny to Jews.

These activists include supporters of Within Our Lifetime (WOL), a group that has called for the destruction of Israel. Astonishingly enough, they enlisted support from members of Jewish Voice for Peace, one of whom affirmed their agenda by portraying Diaspora Jews as serving as “human shields” against criticism of Israel, which he falsely accused of perpetrating “genocide” against Palestinians in Gaza.

The press conference on March 30 was organized by the New York Chapter of Muslim American Society (MAS) to publicize the March 26 arrest of Alexander Heilfer, a 26-year-old Jew from Hoboken, N.J., charged with the unlawful manufacture and possession of firearms by the FBI. The New York Times reported that Heilfer allegedly intended to use Molotov cocktails to attack Nerdeen Kiswani, the founder of WOL, a group that has also legitimized the Hamas-led massacre in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which resulted in the deaths of 1,200 Israelis and the kidnapping of 251 others, many of them held captive for months in Gaza tunnels.

The Jewish Community Relations Council in New York condemned Heilfer’s alleged plot in unequivocal terms, declaring on X that while it “adamantly” disagrees with Kiswani’s “inflammatory rhetoric and her organization’s tactics,” it condemns “in the strongest possible terms the reported plot against her.” The Times of Israel reported that Shai Davidai, a prominent Jewish activist and a former professor at Columbia University in New York City, said: “I despise everything that [Kiswani] stands for,” though added, “at the same time, violence is not the answer. This is completely unacceptable.”

On X, Brad Hoylman Sigal, who, according to The Forward, is “the Jewish Manhattan borough president,” praised the New York City Police Department for stopping the assassination,” saying “political violence, against anyone, for any reason, has no place in our city.”

The response of these Jewish leaders to Heilfer’s alleged crimes stands in marked contrast to the response of Muslim organizations to Islamist-perpetrated violence.

For example, getting Muslim organizations in the United States to respond critically to the atrocities of Oct. 7, which included torture and rape, for an article I wrote for Focus on Western Islamism in late 2023, was like pulling teeth. Umar Lee, a Muslim convert I had interviewed previously, unequivocally condemned the massacre, as did the anonymous person who answered the phone at a mosque in Illinois. The response from mainstream Muslim organizations like the Council on American-Islamic Relations and the United States Council of Muslim Organizations was frankly celebratory.


Michigan’s El-Sayed Suggests Hasan Piker’s ‘America Deserved 9/11’ Remark Must Be Viewed in ‘Context’
The left-wing Democratic candidate for Michigan’s open Senate seat, Abdul El-Sayed, defended his decision to campaign with Hasan Piker, who said "America deserved 9/11." El-Sayed argued in a televised interview that the influencer's comments need to be viewed in "context."

El-Sayed used his Tuesday morning Fox News interview to accuse critics of Piker—who has also defended Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, attacks—of attacking both individuals unfairly. The Senate candidate is scheduled to appear with Piker at two campaign events later in the day.

"It’s important to talk about context," he told Fox & Friends host Lawrence Jones. "I’m never going to agree that 9/11 was justified. It was wrong. It was a horrible day for all of us. I’m never going to be okay with the innocent murder of civilians. I condemned Hamas and I condemned that attack on day one. The issue that you're trying to do is paint me with out-of-context quotes taken out of context specifically to ask me these questions."

El-Sayed also said Piker’s critics are engaging in "cancel culture."

"Because you appear with somebody doesn't mean you agree with them on everything," he contended. "My question to you is, when did we start bending to cancel culture?"

Piker has a long history of backing terrorism against the United States and its allies. He said during a 2019 video appearance that "America deserved 9/11, dude. F— it, I’m saying it."

The streamer has also justified Hamas’s Oct. 7 attacks, called Orthodox Jews "inbred," and praised the "mujahideen" who attacked U.S. soldiers during the war on terror as "brave." He has voiced support for Hamas terrorism against Israel and said it "[d]oesn't matter if f—ing rapes happened on October 7. Like, that doesn't change the dynamic for me even this much."

Jones also pressed El-Sayed about audio from a private campaign meeting in which the candidate said he didn’t want to make a statement on the death of former Iranian supreme leader Ali Khamenei because many voters in Dearborn, Mich., were "sad" about the dictator’s assassination. The Washington Free Beacon first published that audio last week.

El-Sayed appeared to dodge the question, instead drawing an equivalence between the "regime" of the Islamic Republic and the "regime" of the United States.

"I'm no apologist for any regime, including our own," he said. "And at the end of the day, the question is whether or not a leader focuses on his or her people. Clearly, the ayatollah did not, and clearly Donald Trump and this administration is not either."


‘I Have No Idea, To Be Honest’: Columbia Encampment Organizer Mahmoud Khalil Says It’s Unclear Whether Hamas Targeted Civilians on Oct 7
Columbia University encampment leader Mahmoud Khalil said in an interview that it's unclear whether Hamas targeted civilians in its Oct. 7, 2023, attack against Israel. Hamas is widely understood to have done so.

"I wouldn’t rule out that Hamas targeted civilians, but I wouldn’t confirm it either," Khalil told the Forward in a profile published Tuesday. "That’s my position on this."

Khalil, a Syrian native and Algerian national who served as a negotiator for the Columbia University Apartheid Divest movement and whom the Trump administration has long attempted to deport, spent a large portion of the interview casting doubt on the idea that the terror group sought to massacre Israeli civilians—a conclusion that generally anti-Israel organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch drew in their own reports on the attack.

"I wouldn’t say Hamas were saints or angels and did not commit any crimes," Khalil said. "The fact that civilians were caught up in such violence and the killing means that there were crimes committed, and Hamas has a responsibility for that."

Asked whether it was plausible that the civilians killed on Oct. 7—upwards of 800, according to the Israeli government—were all killed incidentally, Khalil said, "I have no idea, to be honest."

In the same interview, Khalil stated that the anti-Israel movement’s celebration of the Oct. 7 attack and use of Hamas iconography does not mean that all the movement’s participants support Hamas. Instead, he told the Forward, many support the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP).

"A big part of this movement is LGBTQ, and of course they don’t support Hamas," Khalil said. "That’s why you see a lot of PFLP affection in this country just because it’s the left-iest organization carrying out armed resistance."


Medical Practitioner Tribunal Service lets off NHS doctor over 7 October tweets
The Medical Practitioner Tribunal Service has let off an NHS doctor accused of posting objectively antisemitic and grossly offensive comments on social media on 7 October 2023, saying it “did not find that…[her]conduct constituted misconduct which was serious.”

On 7 October 2023, Dr Menatalla Elwan shared video footage of people fleeing the Nova festival, which Hamas had attacked earlier that day. Alongside the footage, Elwan wrote: “If it was ur home, u would stay and fight. U wouldn’t just run away”, alongside a blushing smiling emoji.

In a second post a few hours later, Dr Elwan said: “Israel was never a country. They illegally occupied Palestine. Would u support Russia invading Ukraine? Israel kill Palestinians everyday, didn’t see anyone caring. Also there are no civilians in Israel.”

Hamas murdered around 1,200 people on 7 October, including hundreds at the Nova music festival.

In a judgement made late last month which has now been published, an MPTS panel considered that “whilst Dr Elwan’s posts had been found to be inappropriate, insensitive in their timing and in shockingly bad taste, they were nonetheless permitted as political free speech within the boundaries of Dr Elwan’s Article 10 rights, as they were not found to be grossly offensive or antisemitic.”

It went on to state that “the Tribunal was of the view that, in the circumstances, the behaviour of Dr Elwan would not be considered deplorable by fellow professionals, morally culpable or disgraceful… the conduct did not fall short of clear expected standards at the time of events, nor did the conduct reach the threshold of seriousness for misconduct, given the heightened protection afforded to political free speech.”

The tribunal accepted a number of claims from Dr Elwan, including that she had watched the video without sound before sharing it (the audio included gunshots) . The tribunal also said it was of the view that “Dr Elwan knew that the incident was more serious than a regularly occurring fight between military forces. Further, the wording of the tweet, referring to ‘stay and fight’ suggests that she was aware that it was more than the day-to-day occurrences of a longstanding conflict, although it is accepted that she did not know the scale or extent of what was later known to have occurred on that day.”
NHS consultant filmed calling for Israel to be ‘wiped off the map’ in London protest speech
An NHS consultant has called for Israel to be “wiped off the face of the map” during a speech outside the US Embassy in London on 4 April.

Footage circulating online shows Ranjeet Brar addressing a crowd, praising Iran and its regional allies while urging action against Western governments.

In the speech, Brar says Iran is “rewriting the map of the Middle East” and “ejecting US imperialists from the whole region”. He adds that he supported the continued Iranian strikes against Israel.

He describes Israel as a “genocidal, settler colonial entity” which “has no right to existence” and says it “needs to be wiped off the face of the map”.

Brar also expresses support for groups in Lebanon and Yemen, saying he wants to see their “resistance triumph” and “thrive”.

He calls for the removal of all US troops from the UK and for both the Israeli and US embassies in London to be shut. He also urges the creation of a “resistance movement” in Britain and calls for the current government to be removed from power.

During the speech, he refers to “financiers in the City of London” as “parasites” and accuses them of controlling global wealth and driving conflict.

A spokesperson for King’s College Hospital said: “We are aware of the footage in question, and we are investigating.”

Brar was arrested in 2024 on suspicion of inciting racial hatred after distributing a pamphlet containing antisemitic conspiracy theories, including imagery combining a Star of David with a swastika. The material also promoted claims about “Zionist” control and repeated widely discredited narratives about Jewish identity and history.


ADL, AEN raise concerns over anti-Israel content at American Association of Geographers event
The Anti-Defamation League and Academic Engagement Network issued a joint statement on Tuesday, raising concerns about anti-Israel content held at the annual meeting of the American Association of Geographers.

According to the ADL and AEN, a group called Geographers for Justice in Palestine organized numerous sessions at the annual meeting on March 17-21, including sessions titled “No Geographic Technology for Apartheid” and “Mapping and Counter-Mapping Genocide.”

Shira Goodman, vice president of advocacy and head of the Center to Combat Antisemitism in Education at the ADL, and Miriam Elman, executive director of AEN, said some of the sessions at the annual meeting “lacked factual accuracy, intellectual openness and a commitment to civil engagement.” (JNS sought comment from the association.)

“We are especially troubled that these issues have persisted, despite concerns raised following last year’s annual meeting,” the two said. “At that time, we urged AAG leadership to review its session selection and vetting processes. The apparent lack of progress on these matters raises serious questions about the association’s commitment to maintaining academic integrity and ensuring that its convenings reflect the highest standards of scholarship and discourse.”

They added that “a continued pattern of programming that lacks civility, disregards factual complexity and promotes exclusionary academic practices risks causing reputational harm to the association and to the broader academic community it represents, while also contributing to the marginalization and alienation of many of its Jewish members.”

Gary Langham, executive director of the association, told JNS that “in a world where science and academic freedom are under attack, the AAG was honored to host more than 5,000 academics from 100 countries.” He did not speak to the complaint about unfair or untrue content.

“Participants presented research for discussion and debate in more than 1,200 sessions,” he said. “Both presenters and participants are bound by strict professional conduct rules to encourage open discourse and freedom of thought.”
Ohio University says it won’t act on student vote to divest from Israel Bonds
Ohio University does not intend to act on a measure, upon which the student body voted, to divest from Israel Bonds.

“While Ohio University values input from the student senate and the student body it serves, it is important to note that the university will neither consider, nor act upon, any resolution or referendum that proposes illegal actions or could expose the university to civil liability,” Dan Pittman, senior director of communications at the school, told JNS.

“Ohio law prohibits public universities from ‘engaging in refusals to deal, terminating business activities or other actions that are intended to limit commercial relations with persons or entities in a discriminatory manner,’” Pittman said. “More specifically, Ohio law prohibits divestment from Israeli investments.”

The spokesman added that the Ohio University Foundation publishes audited financial statements annually that “are publicly available in accordance with state law.”

Pittman told JNS about the public school’s intentions after the student government voted overwhelmingly for a referendum calling for the university to divest from Israel Bonds.

The referendum, which JNS viewed, asked students if the university should “commit to end all direct and indirect investments in Israel Bonds through the Ohio University Foundation until Israel Bonds are rated in one of the two highest categories by at least two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations.”

It also asked students if the school should publicly disclose its investments online.

The school’s Students for Justice in Palestine and Young Democratic Socialists of America chapters were among the organizations that backed the resolution.

A spokesman for the school’s student senate told JNS that 86.29% of the 1,853 students who voted, or 1,599, voted for the referendum.

According to its website, Ohio University has more than 28,000 students, including about 20,000 on its residential campus in Athens. That suggests that just about 6.5% of the student body voted on the measure.

The student senate spokesman told JNS that the referendum wasn’t about divesting from Israel but on “the phasing out of Israeli government bonds, based on the worsening credit rating by S&P Global, Fitch Ratings and Moody’s.”

“The idea is to simply let Israeli bonds, if Ohio University has any invested in, reach the maturity date,” the spokesman said. “Also, the referendum from the student body is a non-binding recommendation.”


In Albania, teens at German school discover tribal code of honor that saved Jews in WWII
Sixteen-year-old Melisa Malo, a 10th-grader at Tirana’s Gjimnazi Sami Frashëri, first learned about the Holocaust four years ago when she attended an Albanian-language stage performance of “The Diary of Anne Frank.”

That evening, her parents told her how ordinary Muslims and Christians in Albania — an isolated Balkan nation with no more than 300 native Jews — risked their lives during World War II to hide nearly 2,000 foreign Jewish refugees from the country’s Nazi occupiers. They did so thanks to “besa,” a tribal code of honor that requires Albanians to protect strangers fleeing persecution.

One such Albanian was Refik Veseli, a young photographer’s apprentice who from 1942 to 1944 hid a Jewish family at his own family’s house in Krujë, a village near Tirana. In 1987, Jerusalem’s Yad Vashem honored Veseli and his parents as Righteous Gentiles, the first of 75 citizens of Albania — as well as those of neighboring Kosovo — to eventually be so honored.

Twelve years ago, students at a German high school in Berlin’s Kreuzberg district, which is home to many immigrants to Germany, voted to rename their school in his memory.

On January 27, a delegation from the Refik Veseli Schule visited Tirana for International Holocaust Remembrance Day. Among other things, they and their teenage counterparts from the local Gjimnazi Sami Frashëri spoke to around 150 people about the urgency of fighting antisemitism.

“I think this bridge we’re building between our two schools illustrates the concept of besa very well,” Malo said. “We’re promising to be united and stand up against hatred and discrimination.”

Malo and others then symbolically planted an olive tree outside Albania’s Ministry of European and Foreign Affairs, which arranged the half-day event attended by diplomats, lawmakers, local journalists and other dignitaries.
US judge rejects bid by Swiss Bank UBS to limit its liability for Nazi-linked crimes
A US judge on Tuesday rejected UBS’s bid to clarify a $1.25 billion settlement from 1999 of Holocaust-related litigation against Swiss banks by shielding it from claims based on new revelations about Nazi-linked accounts.

US District Judge Edward Korman in Brooklyn, New York, said UBS was seeking an advisory opinion protecting it from “hypothetical” lawsuits that haven’t been filed.

“Until a genuine case or controversy arises that requires judicial interpretation of its terms, the agreement will continue to speak for itself,” Korman wrote.

UBS did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The Simon Wiesenthal Center, a Jewish human rights group, had argued that UBS’s proposal would improperly expand the 1999 settlement to encompass newly uncovered facts about banks’ dealings with the Third Reich. Its lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

UBS sought Korman’s intervention after an investigation commissioned in 2020 by the former Credit Suisse uncovered additional ties between that bank, its predecessors and Nazis, including 890 accounts with potential Nazi links.

The $1.25 billion was paid by UBS and Credit Suisse, and distributed to more than 458,000 Nazi victims and their families.

UBS bought Credit Suisse in a Swiss government-arranged emergency takeover in 2023.
Rio de Janeiro sees wave of antisemitic incidents during Passover
A series of antisemitic incidents in Rio de Janeiro during the Passover holiday has prompted legal action and renewed calls for stronger national measures against antisemitism.

The incidents come amid a sharp rise in reported cases nationwide. According to figures from the Confederação Israelita do Brasil, nearly 1,000 antisemitic incidents were recorded in 2025—an increase of roughly 150% compared to 2022.

In one case, a bar in Rio’s Lapa neighborhood posted a sign reading “US & Israel citizens Are Not Welcome.” Following public outrage, Rio de Janeiro City Hall and the Brazilian Consumer Protection Agency fined the establishment about $1,850 for severe consumer discrimination. The bar now faces the potential revocation of its operating license.

A separate restaurant expressed support for the bar by posting an image of the Israeli flag marked with an “X” on social media, declaring Israelis unwelcome.

In another incident, Brazilian Jewish chef Monique Benoliel reported that a deli refused to sell her matzah for the holiday, with the owner stating he was “tired of Jews.”

“When business owners feel comfortable hanging signs stating that Israelis are not welcome or refusing to sell Passover food to a Jewish customer, it is a severe warning sign for all of society,” stated André Lajst, CEO of StandWithUs Brazil.

He added that the incidents reinforce the need to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance working definition of antisemitism into Brazilian law. The IHRA, an intergovernmental body comprising more than 40 countries, promotes Holocaust education and remembrance. Its working definition of antisemitism has been endorsed by more than 1,200 governments and institutions worldwide.
Long Island town must pay $19M for blocking construction of Chabad synagogue
After nearly two decades of legal sparring, a town on Long Island has been ordered to pay a local Chabad center $19 million, settling claims that officials unlawfully blocked the construction of a synagogue on its rabbi’s property.

Rabbi Aaron Konikov and Lubavitch of Old Westbury sued the Village of Old Westbury in 2008, after the village passed a law in 2001 governing places of worship as Konikov sought to build a synagogue on his property.

Local officials enacted the law two years after Konikov planned a ceremony to announce a new building on the land where he already operates a synagogue. They decreed that houses of worship could be built only on plots of 12 acres or more. Konikov owns a 9-acre plot.

In October, US District Judge Gary Brown ruled that the 2001 ordinance “unconstitutionally discriminates against the free exercise of religion and is therefore facially invalid.”

Old Westbury agreed to pay the plaintiffs in the suit $19 million as part of a consent decree, which was signed by Brown on March 18, Newsday reported this week.

“This consent decree may not be modified, changed or amended except in writing signed by each of the parties approved by the court,” Brown wrote. “Each party participated fully in the negotiation and drafting of the terms of this decree, and any ambiguity shall not be construed against any party.”

Kornikov did not respond to requests for comment on Monday. But he may soon be switching into construction mode for his long-hoped-for synagogue, for which preliminary plans show a 20,875-square-foot building and an adjacent parking lot.


Noga Erez to play Coachella, despite haters, war and canceled flights
It’s been clear to fans following Israeli indie musician Noga Erez that she and her life partner, bassist Ori Rousso, wouldn’t let Iranian missiles stop them from performing at music festival Coachella, which opens April 10 in Indio, California.

In an Instagram post titled “Episode 1,” or “Playing Coachella as an international artist (from a country at war),” Erez recently shared parts of the odyssey that she, Rousso, and their toddler took to reach the United States.

It clearly wasn’t easy, given the emergency flight schedule operating from Tel Aviv and the ongoing soft cultural boycott experienced by Israeli artists globally over the war in Gaza.

Erez and Rousso continued performing throughout the US and Europe with their band after the bloody Hamas-led onslaught of October 7, 2023, bringing their brand of electro-pop to an ever-growing audience.

If Erez and Rousso have endured anti-Israel hate on tour, they haven’t shared much, beyond a few social media posts.

In one such Instagram story, Erez keeps it light, as she responds to an antisemitic commenter who posted, “Hi jew you suck!” (sic) shortly after Erez and Rousso arrived in the US last week.

“I will make sure your show at Coachella will be cancel, it’s already in discussion! Go back to Israel, you are not welcome here ! P.s. Your Music is horrible,” continued the message.

In a response video, Erez dryly corrected their grammar. “It’s canceled, ‘ed’ at the end,” she deadpanned at the camera.

Despite the ongoing obstacles of being performing artists from a country at war, the two have used their unique sound as a background for their thoughts and views on Israeli and international politics, society, and feminism.


Iranian Crypto-Jewish treasures feature at National Library of Israel
A 200 year old set of tefillin, ketuba and Haggadah translated into Judeo-Persian are some of the rare items at The National Library of Israel that shed light on a dramatic chapter in the history of Iranian Jewry; the crypto-Jews of Mashhad, who were forced to live as Muslim for more than a century but continued to keep their faith in secret.

Considered one of the holiest sites for Shiite Muslims, Mashhad, like Mecca and Medina today, did not allow Jewish settlement. However, a small Jewish community was founded in the 18th century at the invitation of Emperor Nader Shah (1688/98-1747), who sought to turn Mashhad into a commercial hub and made it his capital.

However, by the time the Jews arrived, he had been assassinated, and they were permitted to settle only outside the city walls.

For nearly a century, the Jews of Mashhad lived in a state of constant friction with their Shiite neighbors. Tensions finally erupted into violence on March 26, 1839. On that day, a false accusation led to a blood libel and massacre in which dozens of Jews were murdered, young Jewish girls forcibly married to Muslims, and Jewish homes and businesses looted and burned.

The community’s seven Torah scrolls were seized by Shiite clerics, and legend has it that they remain hidden within the walls of the city’s main mosque – the Imam Reza Shrine – to this day.

The next day, members of the community were faced with a cruel choice: convert to Islam or to die. Thus, for some 120 years, these Jadid al-Islam (“new Muslims”) led a double life of prayers held in secret, clandestine kosher meat slaughter, and mitzvot — including wearing tefillin — kept away from the ever-prying eyes of authorities and neighbours.

Outwardly, they were devout Muslims, fasting during Ramadan, attending prayers at the mosque, and dressing in traditional Muslim attire. Yet from birth, each child had two names: an official Muslim name and a secret Jewish name.

To avoid intermarriage with Muslims, the crypto-Jews of Mashhad often betrothed their young children to other children from within the community — sometimes before they were even four or five years old. In this way, if a Muslim man sought a Jewish girl for marriage, her family could claim she was already engaged.

The similarities between Judaism and Islam made it easier to maintain their hidden Jewish identity. Certain practices, like circumcision, raised little suspicion due to their presence in both religions. However, keeping kosher and observing Shabbat required elaborate deception. Non-kosher meat would be purchased in public but disposed of secretly. Proprietors would open their shops on Shabbat but avoid handling money – some even bandaging their hands and claiming they were injured.






Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon!

"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024)

PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

   
 

 



AddToAny

Printfriendly

EoZTV Podcast

Podcast URL

Subscribe in podnovaSubscribe with FeedlyAdd to netvibes
addtomyyahoo4Subscribe with SubToMe

search eoz

comments

Speaking

translate

E-Book

For $18 donation








Sample Text

EoZ's Most Popular Posts in recent years

Search2

Hasbys!

Elder of Ziyon - حـكـيـم صـهـيـون



This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For 20 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.

Donate!

Donate to fight for Israel!

Monthly subscription:
Payment options


One time donation:

Follow EoZ on Twitter!

Interesting Blogs

Blog Archive