Wednesday, October 24, 2018
Disclaimer: If you are an American Jew who believes in coexistence,
pluralism, and peace, and you think that Israel could not exist without you and
your largesse, you probably should not read this piece as you will find it to
be unbearably pompous and ungrateful.
If you are Israeli and were at
the General Assembly (GA) this week,
with its confrontational theme “Let’s Talk,” you know by now that you should be
very grateful that the Americans have come. Because Israeli Jewry needs a good
talking to, needs to be put in its place. GA Co-Chairman Marius Nacht
underscored this point when he said that looked at from the perspective of dog
years, Israeli Jews are younger than you think they’d be at 70 years old.
Israeli Jews are, in actuality, “adolescent teenagers,” while American Jews are
the “responsible adult.”
Yes. He actually said that. And
then he delivered the coup de grâce. “It’s time for parent and teenager to
talk,” said Nacht.
“Whoa,” I said to myself and
sucked in my breath. “Is that ever paternalistic, or what??”
It’s funny, because I knew it
would be like that at the GA, the paternalistic, insulting attitude, but I had
expected it to be more veiled. Mostly, it was. People used words like “dialogue”
and “discussion” even if what they really meant was “Let’s make Israeli Jews
hear the American Jewish (liberal left pluralistic) viewpoint.”
And force them to heel.
After all, the Americans have
been paying the big bucks to develop Israel and prop it up. They’ve kept it
going all these years. Make no mistake. They told us so, us Israelis. More than
once. Federation bigwig after bigwig, graced with a chance to speak into a mic
these past couple of days patted themselves on the back and said, “Israel would
not exist without North American Jewry.”
Now it could be that’s true.
They certainly have raised a lot of
money for Israel. It could be that without that money, Israel would still be a
dusty, dirty, Turkish outpost, or that Israeli Jews would have been wiped out
in their entirety, slaughtered by Arabs long ago (or pushed into the sea), had
it not been for all that money to buy munitions. It could be we’d all be dead
of malaria if they’d not brought us hospitals and top-notch medical care. It
could be we wouldn’t have so many people here from so many countries, thriving,
with amazing job opportunities, and healthy, nutritious food.
It could be.
But couldn’t it just be that
without Israel, American Jewry would long ago have succumbed to its final death
throes? Might it not be equally true that without Israel as American Jewry’s
symbol and primary project, that North American Jews would have no reason to
remain Jewish or to have Jewish pride?
I’m just going to throw that
out there for you to think about.
It has been said that more than
the Jews have kept the Sabbath, the Sabbath has kept the Jews. I would posit
that “keeping” Israel is just as important as something that keeps Jews Jewish,
uniting them toward a common goal. And that was my reason for attending the GA.
In the run-up to the GA, it was
clear from the venue (liberal Tel Aviv as opposed to traditional Jerusalem); the
panel themes of coexistence, pluralism, and peace; and the identities of the
speakers (nary a religious person or anyone on the right), that the GA was to
be biased in favor of the leftist liberal narrative. This made it crucial to assert
a different narrative, to make sure another side was presented and heard.
But during a panel on the state
of religious pluralism in Israel, the moderator, apparently in reaction to seeing
that my hair was covered, refused to allow me to ask a question of the
panelists. She self-described as “very active on behalf of religious pluralism.”
But her “plural” apparently does not include the orthodox or their views.
I did better on the second day
of the GA during a panel on coexistence. The speakers consisted of two Jews and
two Arabs who have different youth organizations that work to bring Arab youth
and Jewish youth together. It seemed to me that the organizations center on
having the kids socialize to show them that at heart, we’re all just people.
All well and good. But if you
don’t wrestle with the tough stuff, it’s all meaningless. So I posed the
following question to Meredith
Rothbart of Kids4Peace: “North American Israeli Ari Fuld was murdered by a
Palestinian teenager one month ago and this was a very impactful event. Did you
discuss the murder with the kids, and if not, why not?”
Rothbart’s answer seemed vague
to me. “Whenever there is something difficult,” she said, “we talk about it.”
Then she went off into a
tangent about her family saying after every terror attack, “Now will you quit
your job???” and described how her brother was in the synagogue in Har Nof
during the time that the infamous terror attack took place there. How her
family is all over the religious spectrum, and etc.
None of this actually answered
my question. Did they talk about ARI? Did they talk about why some kid just
decided to up and stab him to death because he was a Jew.
My guess is they didn’t talk
about Ari, but perhaps spoke about terror in general terms, without getting
into the specifics. Because if they had talked about Ari and what happened, she
would have said so, in frank terms, without diverging into side issues, or
generalizing about terror attacks in general.
I was willing to let it go,
having at least raised the issue in front of this large, liberal audience. But
another member of the panel, Omar
Alyan of Net@, asked if he could also respond to my question. He made full
eye contact with me, and his voice was infused with sincerity, as he told me
about a recent day in which something had happened (whatever it was wasn’t named)
and it was frightening for the Arab youth of his organization to meet with
Jewish youth because of heightened security measures at the center, which meant
checkpoints and lots of big scary IDF soldiers with guns.
I had been content to shut up,
but now I was furious. “Surely you are not suggesting that this is the same as
minding your own business and being stabbed to death???”
And a woman in a row ahead of
me, turned around, touched me on the arm and chimed in loudly for all to hear, “You’re
right! It’s NOT the same.”
Alyan finished his story by
telling us how a virtual meeting had been suggested instead, but the Arab kids
manned up and said, “No. If we do not come, there will be no peace. We ARE the
peace.”
And so the meeting was held
despite all the scary people in khaki holding arms.
Alyan, by the way, when earlier
asked if Israel had a right to exist, remarked that from Jerusalem to Haifa,
that is his, with all of us living in peace of course. He also said that at the
end of the day, both Arabs and Jews want to make sure the doors are locked,
that both sides live in fear. Which is a lot of crap. No Jews are coming after
Arabs unless the Arabs come at them FIRST.
This session was just chockful
of bull pucky, of course. I could go on and describe it for you. But the bottom
line is that I was grateful to have the opportunity to assert a different, more
truthful narrative at the GA for the American Jewish audience members to hear—a
narrative that illustrates the inequality of the situation. Because the fact is
that no matter how much Jewish and Arab youth socialize with each other, if their
leaders aren’t going to be real about the issues, no true coexistence or
anything of lasting value will come out of these experiments. No matter that
they so deeply please North American Jews with their big fat wallets and their
money.
