In response to questions about potential changes to Iran's nuclear doctrine, Kharrazi indicated that such changes are possible, especially if Iran encounters an "existential threat". He asserted that Iran has the technical capabilities to produce nuclear weapons and encounters no significant obstacles in this regard. However, he emphasized that the fatwa issued by Iranian Leader Sayyed Ali Khamenei serves as the sole constraint preventing Iran from pursuing nuclear armament.
So, suddenly fatwas are not permanent? They can be changed at the whim of the person who (supposedly) issue them?
In other words, they have no legal weight whatsoever?
Now, we already knew that the fatwa was a joke, and could be changed at any time. But here we are seeing a major Iranian official saying that same thing.
The "fatwa" that enamored Barack Obama and John Kerry ("we have great respect – great respect – for the religious importance of a fatwa") was not worth the paper is was never written on. (Yes, it was only given orally in the mid-1990s)
We all know that Iran kept pursuing nuclear weapons well after the fatwa. It never meant anything. But now we even have an Iranian official pretty much admitting it.
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon! Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. Read all about it here! |
|