Wednesday, January 03, 2024


Disclaimer: the views expressed here are solely those of the author, weekly Judean Rose columnist Varda Meyers Epstein.

On October 7 at 6:30 a.m., Meir Adoni [died]. A minute later, a new Meir was born. A Meir that repents his sin. A Meir who is ashamed that he was part of the delusion of the delusional Left who don’t understand that we are surrounded by extreme Islam monsters who have no interest in peace and normalcy, and only want to burn us alive.

He ended by asking forgiveness from Israel and God for having identified as left-wing. [1]

The kibbutzim where the slaughter occurred, by all accounts, lean to the political left. Many or even most of the kibbutz survivors would tell you they were happy when the settlers were expelled from Gush Katif. They thought the expulsion would bring peace. That was their ideology.

And their belief was unshaken, even when there were sirens and rockets and days and nights in safe rooms. They wouldn’t stop educating their children in the ways of peace. They kept on helping to transport sick children from Gaza into Israel for treatment in Israeli hospitals. The good farmers believed that in the end, goodness would prevail and there would be war no more.

Now in the aftermath of October 7, there is deep disillusionment. “We are the peaceful people,” they had thought. “No one would harm us,” as if pureness of heart were a kind of shield.

They couldn’t have imagined a people so cruel. No one could. Only what happened on October 7 could have broken the hope that peace would yet win out with the people of Gaza. The survivors now understand that Gaza is filled with monsters, and that there is no possibility of peace with the “Palestinian” people. That about-face from left to right, is a common theme in the emerging survivor testimonies.


Nir Shani of Kibbutz Be’eri, managed to hold the door of his safe room shut, as terrorists shot up his Kibbutz Be’eri home and then set it ablaze. His 16-year-old son Amit was taken to Gaza, and held hostage. Amit Shani was released from Hamas captivity on November 29, as part of a temporary ceasefire deal, 19 days after his father Nir, gave testimony on the October 7 attacks. Nir says that for the people of Be’eri, the peace movement was their “second religion.” Now Nir knows that peace cannot be achieved at this time, and that it is unrealistic to believe otherwise [emphasis added]:

We do need everybody, everybody to take responsibility of their previous actions and those who led to this situation, because I think it could be prevented and but yeah it—it's complicated now with the Palestinians, and their education is to hate us so badly and the hope for peace I think, no longer can exist after what they did.

We're Jewish, but we're not really religious in the kibbutz. And you can say that our second religion was the peace movement. Like every celebration we were singing a peace song and wishing for peace and oh, if we just do another effort, it would come.

But we don't have any partners from the Palestinian side to—to reach that point. They hate us so badly and [are] not willing. And there is no peace movement [on] the Palestinian side. Not at all. They're just saying, “Yeah, we want to kill them all. We want to send them away.”

So it would take another generation or two with great effort in education to change that. If at all. I think after what they did, we can't stay neighbors any longer. And there must be a certain solution to the problem.

 . . . the western world [sees] the Palestinian in a very romantic and maybe even childish way. I think we really, really wanted to live by them . . . and have peace with them, but they’re not cooperating about it. And the western world expects us to behave by certain rules of engagement that are not [the way of] the Middle East. It's like, based on the knight [battles] in [medieval] Europe.

But here it so different, as you could see in October 7th, and we have to protect [ourselves]. We have no other choice, and I wish it would be different, but for the time being, that is the situation. We have to do whatever is necessary to protect [ourselves].

I mean, the—“the occupation,” “the occupation” all the time. It's not something that we want to do, it's just something that you have to do because otherwise they would be jumping to our throats and kill us. So we have no other choice but to do that and in the most moral way that we can, I think. I mean, we really wish [there was] another way to solve the problem, but that's the situation. That's the reality we live in.

The world should understand that and demand the Palestinians to change their ways and stop supporting [them], because they get a lot of support and it's not helping to solve the problem.


Tali Enoshi-Arad, 37, huddled in the safe room of her home in Kibbutz Holit for hours on that bloody day in October, along with her husband and three-year-old daughter. The Enoshi-Arad family had left the big city for a “quieter” life on this kibbutz situated close to the Gaza border. Now Tali contemplated putting her hand over her little girl’s mouth to keep her quiet so the terrorists wouldn’t hear and discover them, bringing to mind tragic stories from the Holocaust, of mothers desperately trying to still a baby’s cry, and smothering them in the process. The people on Holit were simple farmers. All they wanted was to raise their children in peace. But now she knows that will never be [emphasis added]:

People from Gaza [used] to come in to Israel daily and work in our communities, and some people had very close connections with them um, and just thinking about the fact that this was the result—obviously they are also prisoners in their own city, because they're being uh, held [hostage] by their own government, who doesn't have any care for their safety. They just want to live up to their diabolic, diabolical uh, I guess goals, murdering Jews, killing the—destroying the State of Israel. It's in their [Hamas Charter], but these were not military installations. These were peaceful communities.

We had no form of retaliation, we had no form of attack, we had no objectives, no . . . no um, offense—barely defense.  We were just there to grow some potatoes and raise our kids in peace and you could, you would think that would have been enough, but what they did when they went in, was nothing short of deplorable atrocities.


Hadas Eilon, lived on Kibbutz Kfar Aza, a farming community, from the age of five until the age of 30, when she deemed it time to leave the nest and go out on her own. Her mother still lives there, along with her siblings and their own families. She didn’t live there anymore, but on October 7, Hadas was there with one of her two daughters, for an extended family gathering. Having grown up among the peace-seekers of a rural community, Hadas truly believed that if only people spoke with and really listened to each other, there could be peace. She still wants to believe that—or so it seems—but she is having to adjust her perceptions.

Now she knows: not all, and perhaps many, or even most Gazans want peace. The rest want death. It is hard for Hadas to come to terms with this reality. It appears to help Hadas come to terms with this reality by mentally separating Gazans and assigning them to one of either two groups: terrorists and “Palestinians.” This approach does not appear to give her complete satisfaction; it does seem to give her hope and a way to move forward [emphasis added]:

I am a person who strongly believes in communication and human relations. Hearing that drugs were found on them helped me understand the animals that they were, and at the same time, it was always so difficult for me to understand extreme people, psychopaths. I mean, it's impossible to understand. Extreme people, psychopaths, people who want others to die, that... that I can't understand.

But I also have a hard time generalizing. I also know that there are people, there are Palestinians who want peace. I think that we have a . . . completely impossible situation here. But in this completely impossible situation, something terrible is happening. And again, I was never in favor of occupation, and I always really have conversations and everything, but when there is one side, and I'm not saying that we don't have extremists either, but they don't rule. When there is one side . . . that has a job of destroying and killing and abusing, and when I hear the phone call of the Palestinian who called—a terrorist, I won't say Palestinian, because it's a terrorist—I don't want to generalize Palestinians in any way. A terrorist who calls his parents and boasts that he murdered ten Jews. It's not human, it's not human behavior, as far as I'm concerned, they don't . . . do not deserve any forgiveness or any respect as human beings, because they are not.

So I am ready to make peace with Palestinians and humans who have a heart and family and children. But with terrorists and human animals, I'm not ready to make peace. And if someone wants to kill me, I will kill them first.


Natali Yohanan is a 38-year-old mother of two boys. What happened to her family on October 7, in their home on Kibbutz Nir Oz, and what happened to their neighbors, relatives, and friends, killed her faith in humanity. She no longer believes that peace is possible.

Not in a world where a mother of children can treat another as she, Natali, was treated by a Gazan mother of children, a civilian who infiltrated her home on that terrible day. Natali was shocked into reality by this monster’s cruel behavior toward her and her two sons. The Washington Free Beacon featured Natali’s story in “Netflix and Kill: How a Palestinian Woman Took Over an Israeli Family's Home on Oct. 7,” [emphasis added]:

We had people in the kibbutz who are very involved with the Palestinian, um people. We had one person he's in Gaza right now, he’s kidnapped, that he drove sick kids from Gaza to the hospitals in Israel. We're a very peace-loving community. Like, the country, they always make fun of us that we're very, like, people-loving and we want peace, and in Israel not everyone feels the same, but we don't feel the same, anymore.

I always told my son, “There are kids just like you in Gaza. They just want to go to school, and just want to live, and just want to be happy and be free,” and that's what I thought before. It's very hard for me as a mother to think about a woman who came to my home and saw the pictures of my kids and still came to, to steal and to terrify my kids, and the first thing she did is to open my [electric box] and [turn] off the electricity. Just in the safe room.

So she sat and watched TV, and my kids—we had no water, no food, no air conditioning. It's the middle of the summer. It was so hot.

Like she saw my kids’ pictures on the walls. She knew there's a family inside—like terrified kids. I think that she's a mother as well, because she took my kids’ clothes, and she took my clothes, and she took, um, she took my credit card, and then she went back to Gaza, and she, she went to the supermarket and she bought . . . I got a list of the things she bought.

It broke my faith that people are good. It’s . . . I never thought that a woman would do that. Like men? Yes. Soldiers? Yes. Hamas terrorists? Yes. I knew they were very cruel and very driven, but I never thought a common people—kids and women—would participate in things like that and it broke my faith in the goodness of people, but especially people from Gaza, because I really—I really believed that the women and children were just—they were kidnapped by Hamas terrorists.

I really believed that Hamas kidnapped Gaza, and um, I don't anymore. I think they are participating. I think in that morning [Hamas] told them, “We are going to do this, who wants to come in?” or they invited people they trust and they told them, “You can take whatever you want. You can take. You can plunder. You can steal, and we'll keep you safe,” and they told themselves, “Why not?”

Why not? Like I'm a woman. I'm a mother. I'm a teacher. I work with kids. I believe that all kids are good. All kids are good, good. No one is born bad. No one is born a terrorist and I feel very guilty that I raised my kids in a place that [wasn’t] safe.

I believed that I'm safe. I believed my kids are safe. I really believed it.

Like, we have this sense of, we want revenge, which is a horrible, horrible feeling, but I find myself showing my son videos of houses being bombed in Gaza, because I want to show him that Israel is still strong. I want to show him that the army is strong—that someone is protecting us, because he doesn't feel it anymore, and something in his faith was broken.

It is broken. We don't believe in anyone, anymore. We don't believe in the country. We don't believe in the army. We don't believe in ourselves. We don't believe in in Gaza. We don't believe in the world. We don't believe in anyone who will come to help us, and it's, um, like everything we believed was shattered in that moment.

I don't want Hamas to exist anymore. I want the . . .  the normal, the, the, the good people in Gaza to rule. I want someone who my country can talk to and uh, right now it, it sounds like it will never happen . . .

 . . . I try to concentrate on not falling to the revenge—that we feel like we want to [take] revenge. I'm trying not to focus on that, ‘cuz it's not healthy. It's not going to help my kids. Nowhere is safe in the world like Israel. Israel is the safest place for Jews. That's what I believe.


Her daughter was to depart for a class trip to Poland in a few days. Now, says her mother,  Ola Metzger, the 17-year-old girl won’t need to visit Auschwitz, a rite of passage for Israeli students. She won’t need an experiential history lesson on the Holocaust—the girl won’t need it, because she just went through one, a true Holocaust, right in her home on Kibbutz Nir Oz, so perilously close to Gaza. Ola, 45, used to believe that if we would only alleviate the suffering of the common people of Gaza, peace would reign.

What Ola learned on October 7, was that peace is not a value for them. Material wealth is also not so important to them. What is important to them is their hate. For her, the eye-opener was the destruction, burning cars, homes, people. They already, had already looted and taken what they wanted, money, everything, and still it did not satisfy the lust, because the lust is not for things. The lust is for torturing and murdering Jews [emphasis added].

I told her to hide under the bed because bad guys were out there shooting all, all over, all around, and all I was thinking [was], “What happens if they get in?”

I can't believe that these actions are real actions to aim to free Palestine from someone. I always felt that these people are being hostages you know, of their own regime, and uh, we always felt that if they will be okay, if these people will have something to lose, you know, I mean something to lose, I mean if they have a regular, or more or less regular life and homes and work and you know, money coming in, and uh, food for their kids . . . if they will be okay we will be okay, too.

It's very hard to say that I hate someone, but I don't trust any, anyone now. I, I don't trust them. I can't. We lost so many people, you know, one out of four in our kibbutz . . .

Um, it was [scary]. I was scared. I was scared and then sad you know, later on, because how much hate do you have to have? Okay. So you, okay . . . you came in, you took all the jewelry and you know, and the money, and the computers and TVs, and whatever, and then you just, you just have to like ruin everything?


Irit Lahav, a 57-year-old peace activist from Kibbutz Nir Oz, sustained a serious shock on October 7. It was then that Lahav realized that the people of Gaza were not like her, not like normal human beings. Their behavior, well, they do things Lahav would never dream of doing to anyone, even her most mortal enemy. The smaller deeds of October 7, even, would be beyond her. She could not have stolen a wallet, a bike, or a person’s shoes, let alone perpetrate such brutal acts of violence.

On that day, a border was crossed, all boundaries and norms of behavior breached. Now the ardent peacenik is no more. Now it is us and “them” [emphasis added]:

In 2005, when Israel moved out of Gaza, I was very happy. I thought this, this, is the right thing to do, and I was shocked that 2 months later, they threw bombs, missiles, at us. What, what the heck is going on? They just received what they wanted. Why, why is this going on?

Generally speaking, everybody from the kibbutz is very left-minded. I would say even 100% of the people would really respect the Palestinians and wish really good things for them and never want to hurt them or do anything bad toward them. I always saw that they have an equal right like we do, to have their own country—to be happy, to live peaceful, to be prosperous.

I also volunteered. I would drive the Palestinians who are very sick, from the border to get treated in Israeli hospitals. Am I thinking about myself being foolish until now? Maybe. Maybe. But more is that I'm disappointed at them that they are so cruel, have no values—really lost their human values.

There is no “Hamas” anymore for me. There is the Palestinian nation. They are responsible for that, and I think Israel should [let go] this concept of Hamas being the important people. No. The whole community has invaded and were brutal and violent.

I think about myself. Would I go to somebody’s house and rob it and steal their shoes and bicycles and wallets? And no. I wouldn't. Even if he is my enemy. Even if it's someone that I don't agree with I would not do that, and if this is not clear to them or to the world that's very sad, really.

What else can we do? What else can we do? I fight for the peace. We step out from their land. We respect them, you know, and this is what is going on. Slaughter. Slaughter back.

No. Too much.


[1]Israel-Hamas war: Did Oct. 7 change Israeli left-wing views on peace?” Ariella Marsden, Jerusalem Post, November 24, 2023

 



Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 





  • Wednesday, January 03, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah gave a speech on Wednesday night where he discussed Israel's apparent airstrike against Hamas leader Saleh Arouri in Beirut's southrn suburbs.

He showed his disdain for the Lebanese people whom his party has hijacked..

“Those who think of war with us will, God willing, regret it, and war with us will be costly. So far we have been taking Lebanese interests into consideration, but should war be waged on Lebanon, the Lebanese interests require that we go with the war to the end,” Nasrallah said. 

Did he hold a referendum on what Lebanon wants? Is anyone in the Lebanese government outside Hezbollah controlled parties calling for war?

Nope. Iran decides when Lebanese people are disposable and Hezbollah, like Hamas, is digging tunnels underneath them. 

“Until now, we have been fighting on the front with controlled calculations and that’s why we are paying a hefty price from the souls of our young men, but if the enemy thinks of waging a war on Lebanon, we will fight without restraint, without rules, without limits and without restrictions,. We do not fear war,” Nasrallah added, from is own heavily fortified bunker deep underneath Lebanon.

He also revealed his antisemitism, saying the Israelis are “killers of the prophets and the messengers,”  a standard Islamic slur against Jews. 

Another trope that Nasrallah pushed was that every Israeli has another passport and their suitcase is packed for when things get rough. Which is what all anti-Israel terrorism is based on - the myth that when the going gets tough, most Israelis would flee. It hasn't worked for the past 100 years of terrorism, but this theme is entrenched in Arabic media - every story of a slowdown in immigration, for example, is a headline. 

One other point: Just like in Gaza, the Hamas office that as attacked was in "an overcrowded residential area packed with civilians, shops and restaurants." And the airstrike didn't even break the windows of the building next door.









Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

From Ian:

Alan Dershowitz: Israel Has Committed No War Crimes—Hamas Has
This brings us to the law of war. The only requirement of proportionality under international law is that when combatants are targeted in areas where civilians are present, the value of the military target must be proportional to the number of anticipated civilian deaths. This highly subjective judgment can’t be the basis of a war-crime prosecution, unless the judgment is utterly unreasonable. The 2-to-1 ratio is not only reasonable, but far better than that achieved by other armed forces facing comparable situations. Thus, were Israel to be prosecuted for violating the principle of proportionality, that would necessarily involve the application of a double standard against the Jewish state.

The charge of genocide made by South Africa is even less persuasive. Real genocides have taken place in the world today, especially in Africa. South Africa has been silent about these neighboring genocides. And it is weakening the term itself by selectively politicizing it against Israel. Gaza has grown in population during the period in which genocide is charged. Israel has provided health care to Gazans in need of Israeli hospitals. It provided high-paying jobs in Israel to thousands of Gazans. These aren’t the actions of a nation engaged in genocide.

Genocide is directed against an entire people, not just criminals and terrorists among them. To accuse Israel of genocide is to fail to distinguish between the legitimate military goal of ending a terrorist organization, such as Hamas, and the illegitimate goal of ending the existence of an entire ethnic or religious group.

The term genocide was coined to describe the Nazi effort to rid the world of all Jews. Accusing Israel of genocide is a form of Holocaust denial, since no one even suggests that Israel has extermination camps, gas chambers, or other mechanisms that exemplified the Holocaust. If Israel were to be found guilty of genocide, the very meaning of that horrible crime would be diluted beyond recognition. It would then apply to the US bombing of Hiroshima, the British bombing of Dresden, and the killing of civilians during the Afghan, Iraqi, and Syrian military actions.

Every civilian death in wartime is a tragedy, and Hamas knew it was signing the death warrants of many civilians when it attacked Israel and then hid its war machinery among Gaza’s civilian population. The death of a human shield is the legal and moral responsibility of those who deliberately placed civilians in harm’s way. Consider the following example: A bank robber starts shooting at customers. When the police arrive, the robber grabs one of the customers and uses her as a human shield. A policeman, in an effort to save the lives of customers, tries to shoot the robber. But the hostage suddenly makes a move, and then the policeman’s bullet hits and kills her. Under the law of every nation, it is the hostage taker, not the policeman who is guilty of killing the hostage, even though the bullet that killed her came from the policeman’s gun.

It is Hamas and its Iranian patrons that should be on trial, not the victims of Hamas barbarism.
US intelligence confirms Shifa hospital was Hamas command centre
US spy agencies verified Israeli claims that Hamas and another Palestinian terrorist group used Shifa Hospital in Gaza City as a command center and to hold hostages, The New York Times reported on Tuesday.

In late November, the Israel Defense Forces released extensive video evidence of terror tunnels under Shifa Hospital—the Gaza Strip's largest medical facility—saying it “unequivocally" proves the modus operandi of Hamas, "which systematically operates from hospitals.”

The terrorist group held at least three of the estimated 240 hostages it kidnapped on October 7 at Shifa, the IDF said.

Nevertheless, critics continued to claim that the IDF had little evidence Hamas used the hospital as a command post.

"In the weeks since the operation, news organizations have continued to raise questions about Hamas’s presence at the hospital. And health and humanitarian organizations have criticized the Israeli operation. A humanitarian team led by the World Health Organization, which visited Al-Shifa immediately after Israeli forces stormed the hospital, called it a 'death zone,'" the Times reported.

But a senior US intelligence official said Tuesday that the American government was convinced that Hamas used the hospital complex to direct terrorist forces, store weapons and hold “at least a few hostages.”

The official also said US spy agencies had information that Hamas destroyed evidence before the IDF operation at the hospital got underway.
How Hamas covered its tracks in Gaza's Shifa Hospital before IDF's raid - NYT
Hamas terrorists took measures to prepare for the IDF's November raid of Shifa Hospital in Gaza by destroying documents and transferring hostages to an alternate location, according to intelligence documents obtained by The New York Times.

The report said that US intelligence found that Hamas destroyed technology and documents crucial to the organization's operation, with Shifa hospital as a home base.

US intelligence sources emphasized that Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad used the hospital as a command center for terrorists in the field fighting against Israeli forces. This intelligence assessment was conducted after Israel insisted that Hamas had built a huge military compound under the hospital – which, according to the report, had become a "legitimate military target for Israel."

Hostages not located, but remains found nearby
While inside the hospital complex, the IDF did not find hostages but did find an arsenal of weapons behind medical equipment. The bodies of two murdered hostages were found surrounding the complex.

The IDF's findings at the Shifa hospital grounds indicated use of the space as a military compound, uncovering meters of tunnels complete with living rooms, kitchenettes, toilets, and other infrastructure.

The route of the tunnel, revealed after the shaft seen in the photographs published by the IDF spokesperson, passes under the building of the Qatari hospital located in the Shifa complex and is lined with electricity and communication infrastructure throughout.
  • Wednesday, January 03, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
(Guest post from someone who prefers to remain anonymous)




Various departments and programs within the University of Illinois (UIUC), including Women & Gender in Global Perspectives (WGGP) and the Initiative in Holocaust, Genocide, and Memory Studies (HGMS), have gone through extreme and sometimes dishonest lengths in order to repeatedly propagate pro Hamas voices from some of the most notorious and vile propagandists, and to avoid allowing any alternative voices, since October 7th.

 Here are some examples:

   On October 27th, WGGP and HGMS (along with the Center for South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies) hosted a “Teach-in” panel with Josh Ruebner (who was recently Managing Director of American Muslims for Palestine and the Policy Director for US Campaign for Palestinian Rights), Hasan Ayoub (Al-Najah National University in Nablus/Member of Global Network on Question of Palestine), and anti-Zionist Israeli Ayelet Ben-Yishai (University of Haifa). As will be a running theme, the session consisted strictly of lies, misrepresentations, and double standards geared toward condemnation for Israel.


 

On November 8th, Zachary Foster (ubiquitous pro-Hamas historian at unaccredited Academia.edu) led a “Gaza Teach In” sponsored by WGGP. It was entirely a twisted historical backgrounder on Hamas and rationalization for recent and current Hamas activities.

 

WGGP was approached by locals and staff requesting a balanced panel that offers perspectives from both sides. WGGP agreed to sponsor, in collaboration with HGMS, a panel on December 7th that would consist of Israeli Professor Yifat Bitton and Palestinian activity Hyam Tannous (former Senior Supervisor in Counseling for Women Wage Peace). Promotional material was drawn up (see below) for these two to discuss, but without the knowledge of the panelists or others, WGGP invited 2 additional (and notorious) Palestinian panelists, Susan Abulhawa and Laila El-Haddad, who are both known for supporting terror (Abulhawa has repeatedly celebrated October 7th). The original panelists and those who solicited WGGP for a balanced panel found out about the additional activists only when new promotional material was added. Disappointing as this was, those wanting a voice for Israel were still content to go through in order to have a voice heard. But then Abulhawa sent a letter refusing to participate on a panel with a Zionist. It’s unclear whether El-Haddad was still intending to participate. In any case, instead of following through with the event as planned, WGGP canceled it. When locals objected, WGGP responded to each person with a form letter that stated WGGP and HGMS couldn’t hold the event due to “an incredibly complex series of events which led to one of the panelists canceling.” WGGP then suggested reaching out to Jewish orgs CUJF and Hillel to host an event. Would they suggest Palestinians go to their local Muslim orgs to host an event? Ultimately, they were not willing to allow an Israeli voice unless it was almost entirely drowned out by extreme voices in support of Hamas terror.   

 

·       In addition, a panel event was organized by Graduate Employee Organization (GEO) under the title, “A Panel to understand the historical roots of recent events in Palestine and Israel.” The audience included some pro-Israel students and community members who were hoping for a dialogue. According to a number of attendees, the panel never referenced the October 7th massacre or the hostages, which apparently were not part of “recent events in Palestine and Israel.” Instead, the following were some key comments:

     Ø  Prof. Augustus Wood (, Labor and Employment Relations, UIUC):

-          “This violence (of Hamas) is not merely strategic in their war for liberation, but also a cleansing of oneself, of anxieties, of the occupation, of exploitation.”

-          “Despite what the propaganda is saying, none of this violence (of the Hamas) is unprovoked.”

-          “The armed resistance (Hamas) should not be referred to in crude inhumane terms such as terrorists.”

-          “The US and Israel began to publicize Hamas’s calls for truce and new borders for a free Palestine as anti Jewish, essentially creating a new weaponized form of antisemitism, to demonize anybody who calls for independence.”

-          “The state of Israel proved their worth, and the US swept in (to Israel) like the vampire it is, to extract as many resources as possible.”

-          “We need to dismantle the oppression, and put the humanity back in the discussion.”

 

Ø  Sara Hijab (SJP):

-          “Herzl chose Palestine for various reasons. All those reasons go back to anti-Arab rhetoric and bigotry.”

-          “I hope you realize the evil that Zionism is, and that it has no place anywhere in the world.”

-          “Israel has no interest in creating a safe haven for Jews. It only sees it for its financial gain, as does America.”

-          “We must all become anti-Zionists, the world needs nothing short of that”

 

Ø  Justin Holmes (PhD Candidate, Dept. of Sociology, UIUC)

-          “When we say “from the river to the sea,” we are not talking about genocide, or ethnic cleansing. We are talking about the elimination of a dominating structure and the equal protection and the enjoinment of rights and privileges.”

 

Ø  Prof. Corinna Mullin (John Jay College, CUNY - Labor for Palestine)

-          “In Gaza the armed resistance refuses to submit to Israel’s designs for ethnic cleansing.”

-          “It’s amazing how in their statements and resolutions and protests, students are unapologetic about the Palestinian national liberation by any means necessary.”

 

Ø  Prof. Bikrum Singh Gill (Political Science, Virginia tech):

-          “We need to begin by strongly and loudly saying that currently Israel is conducting a genocide in Gaza.”

-          “There is a genocide happening, and the Palestinian armed resistance is fighting against this genocide”

-          “We need to be very clear: On one side we have a genocidal war. On the other side we have armed resistance against genocide, against colonization, which is essentially a liberation war. There are 2 wars right now – the war of genocide, and the war of liberation.”

-          “As we formulate tactics and strategies to oppose this genocidal war, it’s imperative that we do not throw the armed resistance under the bus in Palestine.”

-          “We cannot play the game that the Zionists are playing, trying to distinguish between the so called humanitarian civilian space and the political power of the armed resistance in Palestine.”

-          “What the armed resistance in Palestine is challenging is the primal, the fundamental equation that underpins colonialism.”

-          “I heard the first speaker speak about violence and the way it can be cathartic and a means to decolonize, but there is also a much more direct purpose to armed resistance, as it hits at the core, at the heart of colonial power.”

-          “From southern Lebanon, Hezbollah uses armed struggle to end the occupation from southern Lebanon.”

 

The moderator concluded, saying that: “We heard of the role of the armed resistance in fighting a war against genocide, a war of liberation, even that terminology is just extremely important. I appreciated the analysis of the root causes of the problem, and provided historical context of Zionism I think was particularly important”.

 

Local supporters of Israel raised questions regarding the ethnic cleansing of Jews from Arab countries, and noted that many Jews lived in Israel for generations. They asked the panel if it would denounce Hamas, and whether the panel seeks a peaceful and equal solution (something Hamas does not seek). And they asked why the organizer of the panel did not offer any alternative voices other than those siding with Hamas. And finally, they asked why events of October 7th were not mentioned.

 

The panel answered as follows:

-          Jews were not cleansed from Arab countries (and that it is propaganda to say so).

-          “What happened on October 7th did not happen in a vacuum. It did not start any new war, any new deaths. Palestinians have been relentlessly murdered and relentlessly bombed since 1948 and so we should talk about what happened before October 7th. The reason why Hamas launched their reaction is because Jewish settlers went and harassed Muslim worshipers in their mosque, in one of the holiest sites for Muslims.”

 

When pressed on what happened on October 7th, the response was: 

-          “On October 7th, Hamas went and made paragliders, and then flew to where Israelis were holding a concert, a festival, right next to Gaza, an open air prison. They took Israeli settlers as political pieces, to exchange for all the Palestinian prisoners who are wrongfully imprisoned with no basis.”

 

The panel stopped the discussion when asked how many were murdered on October 7th, and whether a 9 months-old baby is a political prisoner. They did not answer the questions about the composition of the panel, and reiterated that Hamas should be referenced only in terms that make clear it represents justified armed resistance. 

Beyond this, the Jerusalem Post published a story of another Jewish UIUC student who attended an interfaith dinner wearing her Jewish star necklace and one of the men said he refuses to sit next to a Jew. 

There is a serious problem at UIUC.




Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Wednesday, January 03, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon

Gisha is an Israel-based NGO that says:
Gisha is an Israeli not-for-profit organization, founded in 2005, whose goal is to protect the freedom of movement of Palestinians, especially Gaza residents. Gisha promotes rights guaranteed by international and Israeli law.

Since the 1967 occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, Israel’s military has developed a complex system of rules and sanctions to control the movement of the 4.5 million Palestinians who live there. The restrictions violate the fundamental right of Palestinians to freedom of movement. As a result, additional basic rights are violated, including the right to life, the right to access medical care, the right to education, the right to livelihood, the right to family unity and the right to freedom of religion.

If we take them at their word, then Gisha must be incensed that Egypt has built a huge new wall to block Gazans from fleeing, and that both Egypt and Jordan have insisted that they will not allow any Gazans to take refuge in their countries.

But Gisha, whose very purpose is to allow Palestinians to have freedom of movement, has not said a word about this. They've called for a ceasefire and for more aid to Gaza, but nothing demanding that Gazans who want to leave be given that option. Which is a strange position for an NGO that is dedicated to freedom of movement to take. 

This is par for the course for Gisha. They hardly ever have said anything negative about Hamas restrictions on movement, and in previous times that Egypt prevented people from coming from Gaza Gisha blamed - Israel! 

Neither has any other human rights group demanded freedom of movement for Gazans to anywhere but Israel. No calls from Amnesty, or Human Rights Watch, or Oxfam to open Egypt's and Jordan's borders to refugees. UNRWA, whose entire purpose is to help Palestinian "refugees," does not want to help any of these Palestinian refugees who want to leave a war zone. They could easily welcome Gazans in Jordanian - or even West Bank - camps if they wanted to.

Nothing on this issue from the Refugee Rights website. The International Rescue Committee is not advocating for the rights of Gazans to take refuge elsewhere should they choose to. 

And now it isn't only Jordan and Egypt, but the Palestinian Authority as well.

I had reported on a proposed "humanitarian corridor" by sea that Cyprus has proposed to bring aid to Gaza, which Israel approved. - but the PA rejected it.  On Tuesday, PA president Mahmoud Shtayyeh gave his reasons for this rejection to the Greek consul: "stressing the complete rejection of the waterway that Cyprus talks about under the slogan of transporting aid to the Gaza Strip for fear that the ships will displace our people out of the Strip."

This is a remarkable statement. The PA could simply tell Cyprus that they approve the aid with the condition that no Palestinians be allowed to leave on those ships. If we take Shtayyeh at his word, he is saying that it is better that Gaza forego desperately needed aid completely rather than even having the theoretical possibility of Gazans fleeing via the boats that bring aid. 

The people who pretend to care about Palestinian lives - Egypt, Jordan, NGOs, pro-Palestinian advocacy groups, and even the PA itself - are all dead set against allowing any Gazans from leaving Gaza.

Egypt has allowed hundreds of thousands of refugees from other Arab countries. So has Jordan. They specifically exclude Palestinians. And not one NGO has said a negative word about this discrimination. Why not?

Who, exactly, is making Gaza into an "open-air prison" nowadays?

Human rights is not what these NGOs care about. Attacking Israel is.


 


Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Wednesday, January 03, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon

The Hezbollah-linked Al Mayadeen details "Arab, Islamic condemnations of al-Arouri's assassination." 

The list is pretty pathetic:

- Iranian Foreign Ministry
- President of Iran, Ali Akbar Velayati
- The political bureau of Yemen's Ansar Allah (Houthis)
- Prime Minister of the Yemeni Government in Sanaa(Houthi)
- Yemeni Foreign Ministry 
- Iraqi Kataib Hezbollah
- Secretary-General of the Islamic Action Front Party in Jordan
- Moroccan Observatory against Normalization
- Movement for the Society of Peace (Algeria)
- Islamic Jihad

Their Arabic version of the article adds:

- Head of the Lebanese caretaker government, Najib Mikati
- Lebanese Communist Party
- Iraqi Islamic Supreme Council

Not a single word of condemnation from a country that is not in Iran's pocket. Nothing official from Jordan, Egypt, or Saudi Arabia.

They don't say it out loud, but most Middle East leaders want to see Hamas destroyed. 




Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

Tuesday, January 02, 2024

From Ian:

Seth Mandel: ‘Squandering Sympathy’ By Surviving
These observations about Israel’s squandering nature are offered not in anger but in sadness, of course. Why can’t Israel ever do anything constructive with sympathy?

It’s not as though there’s some mysterious equation to solve here. Israelis gained all that sympathy on Oct. 7 by dying horrible deaths. What’s more important, sympathy or survival? The world is very disappointed in the Jewish state’s choice.

It’s an old story. After Germany’s 1938 annexation of Austria, Jews were desperate for escape. President Franklin Roosevelt wasn’t willing to effect any change in U.S. immigration policy, either by executive action or pressuring Congress. But he was willing to organize a conference of nations who would talk and talk and talk about how sad it all was, because that at least could “show our sympathy with the victims of those conditions.”

“Sympathy” for the Jews usually means a death sentence. And FDR ensured it would be so, as Rick Richman writes in And None Shall Make Them Afraid, his recent book of key moments in the life and work of various Zionist figures (also reviewed in Commentary’s July/August issue here): “The text of the invitation included an assurance that no country would be expected to change its laws to admit more refugees or to provide any funds to resettle refugees; any financing, the invitation noted, would have to be provided by private organizations.”

FDR also instructed the State Department to prevent any consideration of sending the fleeing European Jews to Palestine. Other Western democracies were no better.

In attendance to watch all this unfold was Golda Meir. She was both dejected and resolute. The lesson was that “Jews neither can nor should ever depend on anyone else for permission to stay alive.” The conference inspired one of her most famous comments: “There is one thing I hope to see before I die, and that is that my people should not need expressions of sympathy anymore.”

Meir would return to this theme time and again after the establishment of the state of Israel and her rise to the prime minister’s office. The world, she repeatedly recognized, was full of sympathy for dead and defeated Jews, and the Jews would squander that sympathy by surviving. What has changed isn’t the world’s preferences but the Jewish people’s ability to render those preferences irrelevant.
Dr. Dan Diker and Khaled Abu Toameh: America’s Mainstreaming of Hamas, Antisemitism, and Terror
We are currently witnessing the mainstreaming of Hamas in the U.S. Thousands of protesters across American cities and more than 200 university campuses have been calling to destroy the small, democratic, Jewish-majority state instead of advocating for a peaceful Palestinian one alongside Israel.

Since Hamas' Oct. 7 massacre in Israel, tens of thousands of American university students, faculty, and supporters have been chanting, "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free," a call to replace the only Jewish-majority state with the 23rd Muslim Arab-majority one. Behind many of the demonstrations is Students for Justice in Palestine, a Hamas-linked group which quotes or echoes slogans and rhetoric from the 1988 Hamas Charter and Hamas leaders.

Hamas' jihadi rhetoric and extremist ideology is inciting violence against Jews and Jewish institutions across North America today. Senior Hamas official Mahmoud al-Zahar has threatened to target Jews "wherever they are." In the aftermath of the Oct. 7 massacre, Israel and diaspora Jewry are both targeted for elimination.
Why do feminists turn a blind eye to Islamists?
Other professional feminists and ‘thought leaders’ have been similarly silent on Hamas’s actions. A widely circulated open letter, entitled ‘Feminists for a free Palestine. Stop the genocide. End the Occupation’, neither mentions Jewish women nor condemns Hamas. By early November, over 1,200 ‘scholars who work in feminist, queer and trans studies’ had signed the letter.

Two things are at play in the warped response of Western feminists to the atrocities of 7 October. Firstly, their embrace of the ideology of ‘decolonisation’ and their simple-minded view of Israel as a ‘settler-colonial’ state has prevented them from standing in solidarity with Israeli women. They see them as part of an evil occupying force and therefore as less than human. Secondly, they are unwilling to criticise Islamist terror and violence, largely for fear of being labelled Islamophobic.

Indeed, Western feminists’ unwillingness to condemn Islamist violence against women extends beyond Hamas’s rape and mutilation of Jews. They have also shown themselves incapable of standing up for women persecuted by Islamist regimes in Iran and Afghanistan.

It is over a year since 22-year-old Mahsa Amini was killed by Iran’s religious police for violating Iran’s hijab law and failing to wear the veil ‘properly’. Amini’s killing may have prompted mass protests by brave, hijab-free women in Iran. But it has prompted very little in the way of solidarity in the West. In November, the death of teenager Armita Geravand, also apparently at the hands of Iran’s morality police, passed by with even less comment or outrage. It seems that Western feminists are too frightened of appearing Islamophobic to do what Iranian women have bravely been doing – challenging a misogynistic state that compels women to wear a veil.

Western feminists have shown a similarly curious reluctance to criticise the Taliban. After all, the Taliban ought to be an obvious target of feminist ire. Since it regained control of Afghanistan in 2021 it has banned Afghan women from any form of political participation, prevented them from dressing how they choose and banned them from education and most forms of work. Yet you will struggle to find much condemnation of this medieval sexism from Western feminists and ostentatiously ‘progressive’ organisations this year. After reports emerged that the Taliban has been imprisoning survivors of domestic abuse ‘for their own protection’, the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan meekly said that the Taliban’s handling of ‘gender-based violence complaints’ was ‘unclear and inconsistent’. Which is one way of describing a movement that systematically degrades and oppresses women.

There does seem to be a massive Islamist-shaped blindspot here. Feminists and their progressive apologists are only too happy to call out relatively trivial acts of sexism in the West. Yet they show a repeated unwillingness to stick up for women suffering at the hands of Islamists, from Iran to Israel to Afghanistan.

If we want to advance women’s freedom around the world, then we cannot ignore the misogyny of the Islamists.
  • Tuesday, January 02, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon
In October, Egypt's Youm7 - considered close to the government - published an article calling Israel's action in Gaza a "holocaust."

Israel's Institute for National Security Studies noted this and other Arab articles using that terminology, pointing out how outrageous it is. 

Now Youm7 seems to have just discovered the INSS article and they are ecstatic. They claim the terminology was "a media bullet that pierced the heart of Israel.

And in a new article, they urge all Arabs to adopt this terminology, while tossing in some Holocaust denial:

After the Youm7 newspaper article “The Gaza Holocaust” raised a state of strategic anxiety for the Israeli entity, there is a question, which is why the Arab media - new and old - did not employ these terms that hurt and worry Israel, so I call on everyone who has a media platform, even a page on social networking sites [to us that term.] . ...We must be aware of the importance of terminology. Especially since it has become a weapon no less important than the weapons of field wars

The Zionist state developed and perpetuated the narrative of the Jewish Holocaust to serve its strategic goals, as a means and justification to blackmail the world under the name of anti-Semitism and international terrorism and an excuse to attract the sympathy of the international community to justify killing and aggression against the Palestinian people.
 
This is why they are concerned about describing what is happening in Gaza as a Holocaust:  It is a new Holocaust, which is more credible and more horrific than the Holocaust of the Jews that they claim, because there are many Western and American voices that have begun to doubt the occurrence of a Holocaust of the Jews as it is portrayed by the Zionists, or at least that there are those who consider what happened to the Jews a Zionist exaggeration in numbers and the descriptions.
 
There is agreement by many experts, researchers, and international research communities that the Jewish Holocaust is nothing but a Zionist industry that has been exploited over many decades as a scarecrow, an attraction for immigration to the land of Palestine, and a means - as we mentioned - for global and moral blackmail and for achieving strategic gains for the Zionist entity.
Besides the obvious antisemitism, note that the only reason they give to use that terminology is not accuracy, but because it upsets the Jews and because it frames the war to be other than what it is. 





Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

  • Tuesday, January 02, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon

Benjamin Moser, who is of course anti-Zionist himself, writes in the Washington Post that anti-Zionism cannot be antisemitism because anti-Zionism was created by Jews:

Anti-Zionism, after all, was a creation of Jews, not their enemies.

Before World War II, Zionism was the most divisive and heatedly debated issue in the Jewish world. Anti-Zionism had left-wing variants and right-wing variants — religious variants and secular variants — as well as variants in every country where Jews resided. For anyone who knows this history, it is astonishing that, as the resolution would have it, opposition to Zionism has been equated with opposition to Judaism — and not only to Judaism, but to hatred of Jews themselves. But this conflation has nothing to do with history. Instead, it is political, and its purpose has been to discredit Israel’s opponents as racists.
The article is dishonest on a couple of levels. The main deception is that Moser conflates pre-1948 anti-Zionism with today's - and they are not the same at all. After Israel was reborn, anti-Zionism changed from being against creating a Jewish state to wanting to dismantle the only Jewish state. It is the desire to see a recognized nation destroyed - and by remarkable coincidence, only the Jewish one. Not the Christians ones, not the Muslim ones - just the Jewish one. What are the odds?

Secondly, he quotes early Reform Jewish thinkers on the topic:
 “This country is our Palestine, this city our Jerusalem, this house of God our Temple,” said Rabbi Gustavus Poznanski of Charleston, S.C., in 1841. A century later, during the Holocaust and World War II, Rabbi Samuel Schulman of Temple Emanu-El in New York declared that “The essence of Reform Judaism for me is the rejection of Jewish Nationalism, not necessarily the eating of ham.”
But the Reform movement disavowed its anti-Zionist position before 1948. Its 1937 "Columbus Platform" said, " Judaism is the soul of which Israel is the body." Its 1950 statement said:
The Union of American Hebrew Congregations in Convention assembled send affectionate greetings to our brethren in the State of Israel. We take pride in your heroic achievements. We offer prayers for your continued success. We pledge continued aid for your historic task of rehabilitating the homeless of Israel.

We favor the extension of aid to Israel by the United Nations and the United States Government in order to sustain and strengthen a vital democratic State in the heart of the Near East.

Thirdly, there have always been different flavors of antisemitism. The vast majority of Jews overlapped in each of them, but a few outliers didn't. That doesn't make it any less Jew-hatred.

Racial antisemitism claimed it had nothing against the religion per se the way Christian antisemitism did.  I list a whole bunch of different flavors of antisemitism here.

Just because anti-Zionists swear up and down that they aren't antisemitic doesn't make it so - just as the phrase "anti-semite" was coined to make hating Jews sound scientific and not bigoted. Antisemites over the centuries always claimed that they had solid reasons for their hate, it was never capricious.  Just read Martin Luther. 

If the effect of your beliefs is to demonize the vast majority of Jews by any definition - racial, religious, or political - then it is, in reality, Jew-hatred. 

Even when done by Jews themselves.

Anti-Zionism is part of a long tradition of finding new reasons to hate Jews. When you look at anti-Zionism through the lens of historic antisemitism you see that it is an old wine in a new bottle. 





Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

From Ian:

The Peace Processors Return, Having Learned Nothing from Their Mistakes
Among Western opinionmakers and policy experts—even those supportive of Israel in its war against Hamas—there is a widely held belief that after the fighting ends, Washington must renew efforts to get Israel and the Palestinians to agree to a two-state solution. Daniel Kurtzer and Aaron David Miller, both former State Department officials, recently made such a case in Foreign Affairs, despite the repeated failures of this approach, and the bloodstained results. Elliott Abrams comments:

Our two peace processors . . . acknowledge that “addressing legitimate Israeli security concerns” must be part of the picture—but they give no sense of what they think those concerns might be and how they might be “addressed.” They acknowledge that “even if Netanyahu leaves office, no other current top politician in Israel appears eager to embark down a path of peace. And there are no Palestinian leaders with the gravitas and political weight to engage seriously with Israel in the aftermath of the conflict.” But they do not draw the obvious conclusion from those two sentences: well, okay, so that’s dead. . . .

From everything we can see about Palestinian politics and public opinion, basing Israeli security on dreams about Palestinian pacifism is nuts. Moreover, Iran has under way a vast effort to build proxy forces and strengthen every terrorist group—from the Houthis to Hizballah and Palestinian Islamic Jihad to Hamas—to attack Israel by stocking the groups with guns and money. That is the problem with the two-state solution: no one can explain how a sovereign and independent Palestinian state will not constitute a grave security threat to Israel (and Jordan as well, by the way). Kurtzer and Miller certainly don’t explain it; like all the peace processors, they wish it away, conjuring up a mythical Palestine that loves peace. If you believe, clap your hands!

This is going to be a hard sell in Israel. It ought to be an equally hard sell in Washington.
Inside the tunnels of Gaza
The types of sandy or loamy soils common in Gaza made it both easier for Hamas to excavate the tunnels and harder for Israel to destroy them, two experts said.

The three main types of soil in the 365 sq. km. enclave are:

An illustration of the three types of soil in the Gaza Strip: Dune sand, loess, fluvial and eolian, and calcareous sandstone.

Even in the trickier areas - such as the dunes near the Mediterranean coast that are prone to water infiltration - Hamas had enough building materials and resources to adjust to the type of soil they were dealing with, said Professor Joel Roskin, a geomorphologist and geologist with Israel's Bar-Ilan University near Tel Aviv, who has studied the tunnel network.

“What we've seen is that there are so many tunnels that have been reinforced with concrete,” Roskin said, adding that Hamas had invested considerable money and manpower in construction.

“To dig deeper demands more resources, more energy. The deeper tunnels are of course more difficult to detect.”

A map of the major exposed rock types across Israel and Gaza. Alluvium (gravel, sand, silt, clay, and rock), sand, and calcareous sandstone, red sandstone, and loam are the types found in the Gaza Strip. In the east, towards Jerusalem, the area is predominantly covered by chalk, limestone, dolostone, and chert. Next to the map sits two charts visualizing a cross section of the rock layers below the surface. One for the Nirim area in the Gaza Strip and another for the area surrounding Jerusalem.

John Spencer, chair of urban warfare studies at the Modern War Institute and a founding member of the International Working Group on Subterranean Warfare, said the sandy nature of the soil had certainly made it easier for Hamas.

“I have seen many videos of them digging by hand or using simple power tools,” he told Reuters. “The soil is conducive to rapid and unskilled digging.” By contrast, he said, the Lebanese Shi’ite group Hezbollah had to dig through solid rock in south Lebanon to build cross border tunnels into northern Israel.

Hezbollah has not confirmed the existence of the tunnel network but, in 2019, the Israeli military put on display one tunnel that, it said, reached depths of 80 meters (265 feet) as it ran from a kilometer inside Lebanon into Israel near Zar’it in the Upper Galilee.

The relative softness of the soil in Gaza is also a disadvantage to the IDF teams seeking to clear and destroy the network, Spencer said.

“The loose soil actually reduces the IDF use of explosives to destroy tunnels as the soft soil absorbs explosive force. Add the blast doors in the tunnels we’ve seen, and that further reduces the effects of explosive force traveling through the tunnel.”

An illustration showing the steps for building a tunnel. Initial excavation is usually done manually, with the help of shovels and other tools. In areas where the terrain is tougher, pneumatic hammers are utilized. Lastly, the illustration shows that as progress is made, the walls are reinforced with prefabricated cement or wood slabs.

On Nov. 22, the Israeli army showed some news organizations a concrete-lined tunnel near Al Shifa Hospital in Gaza City that, it said, was a command post for Hamas fighters. The tunnel complex, which the IDF said was at a depth of around 10 meters below ground, featured a bedroom, a tiled bathroom, kitchen and meeting room.

Reuters photographer Ronen Zvulun went inside the tunnels. “The tunnel floor is sand but the walls and roof are lined with concrete, like a tiny road or train tunnel. And just about high enough for someone to stand upright.”
Expert: Hezbollah has built a vast tunnel network far more sophisticated than Hamas’s
Two weeks ago, the IDF spokesman revealed one of the biggest attack tunnels in the Gaza Strip — four kilometers long, wide enough for vehicles to drive through, and running from Jabaliya, north of Gaza City, up until some 400 meters from the Erez border crossing into Israel.

While the tunnel did not cross the border, it presumably could have enabled terrorists on motorcycles and other vehicles to drive underground from the Jabaliya area and exit close to the border before IDF surveillance soldiers or patrols could block them. The IDF did not specify whether this was the case when 3,000 Hamas-led terrorists poured into Israel on October 7, slaughtering 1,200 people and abducting 240.

The uncovering of this vast tunnel, of which there are several more in Gaza, has revived discussion of similar tunnels near, at and under the Lebanon border — especially amid the ongoing clashes there with the Iranian-backed Hezbollah terrorist army, the forced evacuation of tens of thousands of Israeli residents of the north, and the Israeli leadership’s repeated insistence that Hezbollah must be forced back from the border and deterred.

The Lebanon tunnel project was begun and developed long before the one in Gaza. Existing intelligence indicates a vast tunnel network in southern Lebanon, deep and multi-pronged.

At the Alma Research and Education Center, which focuses on the security challenges on Israel’s northern border, researchers have spent many years investigating Lebanon’s underworld. Tal Beeri, the director of Alma’s Research Department, who served for decades in IDF intelligence units, has exposed that subterranean network in material based on considerable open-source intelligence.

Several years ago, Beeri managed to track down on the internet a “map of polygons,” covering what he called the “Land of the Tunnels” in southern Lebanon. “The map is marked, by an unknown party, with polygons (circles) indicating 36 geographic regions, towns and villages,” he wrote in 2021 paper.

“In our assessment, these polygons mark Hezbollah’s staging centers as part of the ‘defense’ plan against an Israeli invasion of Lebanon. Each local staging center (‘defense’) possesses a network of local underground tunnels. Between all these centers, an infrastructure of regional tunnels was built, interconnected [with] them.”

Beeri assessed that the cumulative length of Hezbollah’s tunnel network in south Lebanon amounts to hundreds of kilometers.

In an interview, Beeri recalls that the research paper on Hezbollah’s “Land of the Tunnels” was published immediately after 2021’s Operation Guardian of the Walls — where the IDF had engaged in tackling Hamas’s underground “metro” in Gaza, an operation that in retrospect did not achieve its goal of destroying the tunnels in the enclave.

The paper also featured a map assessing the likely 45-kilometer route of one “attack tunnel” in south Lebanon.
Israeli drone kills Hamas deputy chief al-Arouri in Beirut
An Israeli drone strike on a Hamas office in Beirut eliminated top terror chief Saleh al-Arouri on Tuesday night, Hamas’s Al-Aqsa Radio announced.

The explosion rocked the south Beirut suburb of Dahiyeh, a Hezbollah stronghold. In addition to al-Arouri, at least three other Hamas operatives were also killed in the blast, Reuters reported.

Al-Arouri, the commander of Hamas operations in Judea and Samaria, as well as the deputy politburo chief under Hamas chairman Ismail Haniyeh, had been based in Lebanon in recent years.

He was one of the top Hamas leaders on Israel’s target list following the terrorist group’s Oct. 7 massacre of at least 1,200 people in the northwestern Negev.

In a statement cited by Saudi Arabia’s Al Arabiya channel on Tuesday, Hamas described al-Arouri as the “architect” of the massacre.

Al-Arouri was informed of the impending invasion half an hour beforehand so he could alert Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, French outlet Le Figaro reported last week.

Local media said Nasrallah canceled a speech scheduled for Wednesday following the reports of al-Arouri’s death.

Israel is anticipating a response to the alleged assassination, according to Hebrew-language media, including possible long-range rocket fire.

During a Nov. 3 speech, Nasrallah threatened the Jewish state, telling Israelis that a preemptive strike against Lebanon would be “the most foolish mistake you make in your entire existence.”

The Hezbollah leader has repeatedly warned that any assassination in Lebanese territory would be met with a “strong reaction.”
  • Tuesday, January 02, 2024
  • Elder of Ziyon

We've seen plenty of idiotic anti-Israel Western celebrities like Mark Ruffalo, Susan Sarandon and Cynthia Nixon.

But Arab celebrities may be even dumber.

A Kuwaiti singer known as "Shams" gave an interview on an Egyptian TV channel.

She said, “We are in a time that repeats itself every 2,000 years, and we are currently living in the Age of Aquarius, and these are astronomical and scientific calculations. Over the next 2,000 years, which will begin in 2024, there will be frightening scientific and technological development and high-level achievements, but they will be years of fraud, falsity, lies and deception."

Shams added, “I see that starting in 2024 the world will be divided into slaves and masters based on the dualities of good and evil, male and female, and black and white.”

Shams continued "The reality is that 7 million Jews rule humanity, which numbers 7 billion people, because they control medicine, the media, banks, science, and all the oxygen of life."

Well, there you have it.


Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

AddToAny

EoZ Book:"Protocols: Exposing Modern Antisemitism"

Printfriendly

EoZTV Podcast

Podcast URL

Subscribe in podnovaSubscribe with FeedlyAdd to netvibes
addtomyyahoo4Subscribe with SubToMe

search eoz

comments

Speaking

translate

E-Book

For $18 donation








Sample Text

EoZ's Most Popular Posts in recent years

Hasbys!

Elder of Ziyon - حـكـيـم صـهـيـون



This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For over 19 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.

Donate!

Donate to fight for Israel!

Monthly subscription:
Payment options


One time donation:

subscribe via email

Follow EoZ on Twitter!

Interesting Blogs

Blog Archive