Showing posts with label AI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AI. Show all posts

Thursday, June 09, 2022

In 2015, Amnesty International created a website called the Gaza Platform, created with Forensic Architecture, that claimed to identify every casualty in the 2014 Gaza war and the circumstances around the incident.

As I showed at the time, the database was filled with inaccuracies, and many of the people that they claimed were civilian were in fact terrorists. Amnesty was aware of my research showing terrorists in their uniforms with guns that they called "civilian" and chose to keep the lies in the database - which is still available, today.

Airwars is another NGO that purports to document the innocent victims of war, and they do just what Amnesty did - they are calling legitimate military targets "civilians."

This is a Twitter thread by open source researcher DigFind on this:

Our investigation finds that award winning non-profit company @airwars is whitewashing terrorism with the help of high profile donors.

Airwars' interactive map project detailing the "civilian casualties" in Gaza was nominated for @amnesty media awards 2022.
ImageImage
Airwars is based at Goldsmiths, University of London @GoldsmithsUoL. Chris Woods @chrisjwoods is the founder and until yesterday the director. Chris also sits on Forensic Architecture @ForensicArchi's Advisory Board. 
Previously, Amnesty International @amnesty and Forensic Architecture @ForensicArchi teamed up to create the "Gaza Platform", an online data visualization app that describes many known Palestinian terrorists as civilian casualties of the 2014 Gaza War.ImageImage
Mohammed Barham Abu Draz (محمد برهم على أبو دراز) was a member of Al Qassam Brigades - a terrorist organization. He is listed as civilian casualty.
gazaplatform.amnesty.org/#1528

Same for Alaa’ Jamal Barda (علاء جمال بردع). He was a field commander with the same terror group.
ImageImageImageImage
Airwars receives funding from Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust @jrct_uk, Open Society Foundations @OpenSociety, Stichting Democratie en Media, Reva and David Logan Foundation, and J. Leon Foundation. 
Some examples of "civilian casualties" that were actual Hamas, Fatah, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad terrorists.

Ezz El-Din Mohamed Helles (عز الدين محمد حلس) - member Al Qassam Brigades
Image
Muhammad Yahya Abu Al-Atta (محمد يحيى أبو العطا) - field commander al-Quds Brigades, the armed wing of Palestinian Islamic Jihad.Image
Muhammad Saeed Abu Al-Atta (محمد سعيد ابوالعطا) - field commander Al Qassam Brigades.Image
Osama Ashraf Abu Rida (اسامه اشرف ابو ريده) - Activist Fatah youth. Fatah Movement Eastern Region referred to him as their martyr hero.Image
Zaher Atya Anbar (زاهر عطية عنبر) - member of Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades - Nidal Al-Amoudi Brigade, a Gaza based armed group.ImageImage
Yasser Al-Masry Abu Musab (ياسر المصري ابو مصعب) - Commander of the Deir al-Balah Brigade in Saraya al-Quds. Recently he died of injuries sustained in May 2021. Airwars' assessment of the IDF strike on Al-Masry - "civilian harm"ImageImage



I'd like to add that when someone is misidentified as a civilian, it not only affects the raw statistics of the victims. If the IDF has a legitimate target that was of a high enough value, then under the laws of armed conflict they are allowed to attack it even if there are civilians that will be harmed. This is not a carte blanche to attack anyone without regard to civilians, but if the target is someone or something that is important enough, some collateral damage is acceptable according to the principle of proportionality.

This means that any civilians who were effectively used as human shields by the terrorists cannot be treated as if they were killed far away from any target. Unlike how NGOs like Amnesty and HRW frame it, their deaths are legal. Only if there was no military gain from the attack does it violate the laws of war. When NGOs pretend that every civilian is a victim of Israel, they have it backwards: they died because Hamas and other terrorists hid behind them.



Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism  today at Amazon!

Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. 

Read all about it here!

 

 

Monday, March 14, 2022

From Ian:

David Collier: Amnesty International admits – it wants the destruction of Israel
Tokenising Jews, silencing their voice
We are left with O’Brien sitting in his ivory tower talking about Jews. He says he knows what Jews think. He disagrees with surveys that suggest he may be wrong. O’Brien clearly thinks he knows Jews better than they know themselves. British Jews know this antisemitic feature of the hard-left all too well. We dealt with it as it ran rampant through the Labour Party. People telling Jews that they knew better than the Jews, what being Jewish was about.

Since when was it in Amnesty’s remit to cast aside surveys of American Jews and suggest that Amnesty know better?

Like many, O’Brien does not understand ‘Jews’ at all. I am sure he has one or two Jewish friends. People, with one foot already outside of the community who have turned their ‘Jewishness’ into something abstract and meaningless. Just as the Corbynites hid behind fringe hate groups like Jewish Voice for Labour, Amnesty have found their ‘acceptable’ Jews now too.

But Jews won’t be told by naive fools such as O’Brien what they do or do not want. We will reject Amnesty’s blatant antisemitism. The Jewish people were stateless for long enough. We know all too well how high the price can be for political impotence. And as we look at Ukraine – it is worth reminding ourselves of the reality of the world that we live in. The world needs a Jewish state that is independent and capable of defending itself. We need Israel. This is not up for debate.

Seeking the destruction of Israel
So now we know for sure. Amnesty International is seeking the destruction of Israel. O’Brien has his vision. He calls it a ‘Jewish safe space’. He says Israel should not exist as ‘a Jewish state’. We recognise this terminology. It is the same language that BDS uses. With Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran all making genocidal threats, O’Brien is trying to convince Jews they live in ‘Switzerland’.

He has the same problem many on the left do. He sees Jews as white and privileged and he sees Palestinians as ‘brown’ and gives them no agency. Rather than viewing the Islamist need for imperial domination as the problem, he sees the tiny Jewish safe haven as being the cause of the conflict. There is no point looking for logic, truth or consistency in this. It is the same incoherent modern leftist swamp in which antisemitism thrives.

The bottom line is this. Amnesty seeks the destruction of Israel. They want a world without an independent state for the Jewish people. They have clearly placed this at the top of their ideological wish list. There is no argument anymore. Amnesty International are as antisemitic as they come.
JPost Editorial: Amnesty International's report on Israel is full of distortions and lies
In the US, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Maryland) called the report “a gross mischaracterization of Israel, its history and its values.” State Department spokesperson Ned Price warned against applying double standards to Israel.

Most Jewish organizations also rejected the report. But O’Brien, who is not Jewish, obviously trusts his gut instinct more. He also seems to be hoping that by “changing the conversation” and repeating the apartheid lie enough times, he can create new facts.

The event is the first in a series hosted by the WNDC that will explore “Palestine past, present and future.” Israel’s own ancient past, its successful present and its future as the Jewish state is of less importance to the group.

In a separate story published over the weekend, JTA revealed that the environmental Sierra Club NGO has canceled its scheduled trips to Israel in response to pressure from progressive and anti-Zionist groups after activists alleged the organization was “greenwashing the conflict” and “providing legitimacy to the Israeli state, which is engaged in apartheid against the Palestinian people,” according to an email seen by the news agency.

This is another example of what happens when the apartheid libel is deliberately spread.

Such efforts don’t only harm Israel’s image, they cause once respected organizations to lose their credibility and standing. Above all, they do absolutely nothing to promote peace or help the Palestinians.

By criminalizing Israel and ignoring Palestinian anti-normalization and terrorism, these organizations and the progressive activists are encouraging more rejectionism and more terror.

The Palestinian Authority will see no reason to make even basic moves to peace as long as it believes it can erase Israel with progressive, Western support. The lies themselves fuel further attacks, both on Israelis and on Jews and Jewish targets around the world. The apartheid libel is not only a lie, it is a dangerous one.


Netanyahu: New Nuclear Agreement Will Give the Ayatollahs a Nuclear Arsenal
Opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu launched a scathing attack on world powers who are continuing to negotiate a nuclear deal with Iran — even after the Islamic Republic fired missiles toward the US consulate in Iraqi Kurdistan.

In video messages posted to social media in both Hebrew and English on Sunday evening — addressed to Israeli and American citizens, respectively — the former prime minister said it was “absurd” for world powers to continue to negotiate in Vienna with Tehran.

“The desperate rush to sign this flawed nuclear agreement with Iran is not only absurd, it’s downright dangerous,” Netanyahu stated in his English video, posted with the caption: “Every American family should watch this video.”

“Yesterday, Iran fired missiles in the vicinity of the American consulate in Iraq, and the US continues to charge ahead, along with the other powers, to sign a nuclear agreement that will give the ayatollahs a nuclear arsenal,” Netanyahu charged.

“It would also relieve sanctions and give them hundreds of billions of dollars in order to continue the terror that they waged yesterday and wage every day throughout the Middle East and the world,” he said. “This agreement is even worse than its predecessor, because in three years’ time, under this agreement, Iran will be a threshold nuclear state. It will have enough enriched uranium to create dozens and dozens of nuclear bombs and it will have the ICBMs [intercontinental ballistic missiles] to deliver them to any place in the United States.”

The final details of the burgeoning nuclear deal between Iran and world powers have yet to be revealed, and diplomats involved have said that some remaining elements are still being negotiated. It was not immediately clear which documents or intelligence Netanyahu was basing his claims on.


Wednesday, February 09, 2022

Weekly column by Vic Rosenthal


The recent Amnesty International report which accuses Israel of apartheid and crimes against humanity is demonstrably dishonest, tendentious, and so lacking in context to be unworthy of serious consideration. Indeed, it has even been called “a paradigmatic example of anti-semitism [sic].” But this will not prevent its use as a weapon in the ongoing diplomatic and legal war being waged against Israel in the UN. As Anne Herzberg of NGO Monitor wrote,

These groups [Amnesty, Human Rights Watch, B’Tselem]—through their personal connections and singular influence at the U.N. Human Rights Council, and the acquiescence of Europe—instead will simply get U.N. Special Rapporteur Michael Lynk and the Navi Pillay-headed Commission of Inquiry [COI] to uncritically adopt their claims and mark them with the U.N. stamp of approval in the next few months. Unsurprisingly and in keeping with his history of anti-Israel activism (as well as in violation of U.N. rules), although he is ostensibly currently conducting an independent and objective investigation of apartheid, Lynk promoted the group’s report on Twitter. There is no doubt that the COI will act in a similar fashion.

Here are a few of Amnesty’s dozens of recommendations (p. 272ff.): Israel must repeal its nation-state law, “relocate” Jewish residents from areas outside 1949 armistice lines, cancel evictions of Arabs (for nonpayment of rent) and change the law so that “Palestinians” are not subject to “forced eviction,” grant recognition to all “unrecognized villages” in the Negev (i.e., legalize squatting on state land), remove all restrictions on freedom of movement of people and goods into and out of the Gaza strip, punish officials and military personnel for their “violations of international law” and “crimes against humanity,” and – last but not least:

Recognize the right of Palestinian refugees and their descendants to return to homes where they or their families once lived in Israel or the OPT, and to receive restitution and compensation and other effective remedies for the loss of their land and property.

It should be clear from the above that Amnesty’s objective is no less than the end of Israel as a Jewish state, and its replacement by an Arab-majority state. Nevertheless, we can expect in short order UN resolutions calling for sanctions on Israel and attempts to prosecute Israeli officials and IDF officers in accordance with Amnesty’s recommendations.

The accusations contained in the report constitute a große Lüge, a “big lie.” They are “supported,” in a parody of scholarship, by citations from their own previous reports, from anti-Israel UN agencies like the notorious Human Rights Commission, from documents provided by the so-called “State of Palestine,” from interviews with Palestinians, from the work of anti-Israel academics, and of course from numerous NGOs, including those that were recently outlawed in Israel because of their links with the terrorist Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.

Amnesty is the largest player in the world-wide “human rights” industry. The organization operates in numerous countries and has an overall budget of close to $US 300 million. It started out in the 1960s with a pro-Western orientation, perhaps receiving funds secretly from the British government and the CIA. At some point it became more critical of the West; in 2011, it called for George Bush to be prosecuted over the treatment of 9/11 detainees. In recent years, it has focused disproportionately on alleged human rights abuses by Israel, perhaps as a result of hiring a number of anti-Israel activists for key positions. Agnes Callamard, Amnesty’s secretary-general since March 2021, recently had to disavow a tweet she made in 2013, idiotically accusing Israel of poisoning Yasser Arafat.

But Amnesty’s biased researchers had significant help on the ground. The Zionist group Im Tirtzu (disclosure: I’m a member and donor) analyzed the Amnesty report and found that 77% of the citations from various NGOs in the report came from 16 Israeli organizations, which are heavily funded by foreign money, mostly from the EU and its constituent governments. They are the usual suspects; B’Tselem, Adalah, Ir Amim, HaMoked, Peace Now, and others. Over the past 10 years, these groups have raked in more than half a billion shekels ($US 171 million) from the European Union and its constituent governments. B’Tselem alone got more than 62 million shekels ($US 19 million).

This is a huge sum and should be a scandal of major proportions. These organizations, despite having almost no support among Israel’s Jewish population, are able to exert great pressure in the legal and political realms. They have petitioned the Supreme Court to dismantle communities built over the Green Line, to prevent the demolition of the homes of convicted terrorists, to prevent the deportation of illegal residents, and so on. They seem to have good access to the Israeli media, as illustrated by the recent B’Tselem and Peace Now campaign to mainstream the idea that there is an outbreak of “settler violence.” But most importantly, they produce a steady flow of accusations against Israel to the international media and to foreign governments.

Whenever there is a military conflict, they swing into action to provide respectability to the propaganda from Israel’s enemies; and they provide the fodder for international condemnations of Israel, as happened in 2009 with the Goldstone Report. Much of the material they supply is simply a repetition of claims made by the PA and Hamas, which achieve credibility through the “halo effect” created by their passing through a supposedly disinterested NGO.

Why does the EU pay to maintain subversive anti-state organizations in Israel? Some of the officials involved may actually believe that they are advancing the cause of human rights. On a few occasions, when the connection to terrorism has been blatant, the EU or a government has suspended funding for a particular group. But they appear to be fine with the idea of supporting the Palestinian cause, the dissolution of the Jewish state, at least when no guns or bombs are directly and immediately involved. I believe that there is a deep feeling in Europe, possibly going back long before there was a Palestinian cause (or even Palestinians), that the world would be better off without Jews or, even more so, their state. Antisemitism has somehow morphed into humanism.

And why does Israel permit her enemies to support a subversive fifth column inside the state? I don’t know. Big money corrupts. Maybe enough Israeli politicians have personal connections to these NGOs, and they or friends and family benefit from them, and that’s why the laws that have been passed to regulate foreign money are weak and toothless. Maybe now, after the damage has been done, the Knesset will take action.

The Amnesty report is just another libel against the Jewish people, like the medieval blood libels and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. There is little that the State of Israel can do to silence its external enemies. But it does not have to allow them to pay her home-grown quislings to do their dirty work.





Wednesday, December 25, 2019



David Collier has written a walloping 200-page report (available for download as pdf) exposing the anti-Israel bias and obsession of international human rights group Amnesty International. In its sheer breadth of coverage, the report is an astonishing body of work, but then we’ve come to expect nothing less from Collier. We watched on, not so long ago, as he issued a similar bombshell, his multipart exposé of Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party. That report appeared to necessitate Collier infiltrating a secret Labour Facebook group.
David Collier
This is like the kind of spy stuff you read about in novels. It would take guts to do that and not a little caution, sustained over a lengthy period of time, in order to avoid detection. But Collier’s unconventional methods of research have borne fruit, witness the fact that Boris Johnson is in and Corbyn is most definitely out.

Collier is using new and different tacks in the fight for Israel and against antisemitism. The way he uses social media, for instance, is something we haven’t seen before, at least not with this level of commitment. What has Collier uncovered about Amnesty and what can we, as regular people, do to emulate his work going forward? I spoke with Collier to learn more:
Varda Epstein: Tell us about Jewish Human Rights Watch. How did this body come to commission you to investigate Amnesty International? Tell us about your background and credentials. What sort of manpower and hours were devoted to this project?
David Collier: Jewish Human Rights Watch is a UK-based NGO. They fight anti-Israel bias the clever way, either by challenging it in the courts or exposing the toxic nature of those that stand against us. For example, they have been fighting the legality of local town councils passing BDS motions and this effort and the publicity they caused, may have played a part in the UK Government’s recent announcement that it is going to ban councils from pursuing such motions altogether.
I have done work for them before, when they commissioned a report on antisemitism in the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign. The report successfully clipped the SPSC’s wings. We both saw bias in Amnesty as a major issue, so it was natural they would turn to me for this project.
I have been fighting anti-Israel bias for two decades. My own strategy is different from most. I don’t push pro-Israeli material so much. Our problem is not whether or not Israel is perfect – it doesn’t have to be – Israel has every right to be a state that makes mistakes like all states do. Our issue is that our enemies are full of toxicity and hate. This is their biggest weakness and we should spend more time exposing them for what they are. If you engage in a “did/didn’t” argument with an anti-Israel activist, the bystander becomes confused. Far better just to show the person you are arguing with is a terrorist-sympathizing antisemite. Bystanders understand this much more clearly. We will never convince an anti-Israel activist he is a hatemonger, so don’t both trying, just expose his hate to others.
The Amnesty research took months and well over 1000 man hours. There were hundreds of thousands of social media posts to cover. During the summer of 2019, I didn’t sleep much.
 Varda Epstein: Why do we care about Amnesty International’s bias? What is the impact of this organization?
David Collier: We cannot overstate the impact of NGOs like Amnesty. They are the bridge between actions on the ground and International forums such as the UN, UNHRC and even the ICC. The NGOs are seen as legitimate and impartial “judges” and their findings carry real weight. None more so than Amnesty. If Amnesty is simply pushing raw anti-Israel propaganda as evidence during a UN hearing, they legitimise the UN’s own bias against Israel. In effect Amnesty acts as the glue which reinforces a global anti-Israel bias – if they played fair, things would look very different. 
Ashira Prem Rachana is a "human rights researcher" for Amnesty International
Varda Epstein: Was Amnesty International always so political? Did it ever do good work? Was there a turning point?
David Collier: Yes, of course. Amnesty’s sterling reputation was legitimately earned and this is, in part, why the situation is both tragic and difficult to address. Amnesty relies on the reputation from the good work it used to do to shield it from criticism today.
Originally, and in the much simpler days of the Cold War, Amnesty dealt solely with political prisoners. As the NGO arena became more overcrowded and competitive, Amnesty sought growth – both in the areas it monitored and in the type of work it undertook. They became more political. They felt it necessary to let go of crucial rules they imposed on themselves to stay clear of conflict of interest issues. In truth there were logical reasons for them to do so – but they put nothing in its place and were slowly devoured by activists using Amnesty resources for their own narrow interests. The decline has been gradual and going on for decades.
Nadine Moawad, MENA communications manager for Amnesty International
Varda Epstein: Your report states that a consultant for Amnesty, Hind Khoudary, tweeted support for a terror organization, referring to known Islamic Jihad terrorists as “heroes.” Tell us about that. Was the tweet issued as a private citizen? Does it matter?
David Collier: It doesn’t matter at all. I think one of the things Amnesty will do to deflect the criticism of the report is to suggest some of these people weren’t associated with Amnesty when they made the unacceptable comments. This is irrelevant. Imagine a judge going home and tweeting as a private citizen that terrorists are heroes – would any sane person consider him fit to be a judge? With Khoudary, there were numerous tweets. At roughly the same time she called the two terrorists heroes, she also retweeted advice to people in Gaza not to publicly say anything that would ‘hurt the resistance’. This person is a hard-core Palestinian activist and a supporter of terrorist groups like Islamic Jihad. At no point can she be considered impartial, not before or after the time she made those tweets. As it happens in this case, I think she was listed as an Amnesty consultant at the time – but in any event, it is absurd to believe she would ever tell the truth about what is taking place on the ground.
Varda Epstein: How does it feel when you see that Amnesty staffer Laith Abu Zeyad regularly retweets WaadGh who tweeted a smiley face in relation to the terrorist murder of Rina Shnerb? Do you ever need a mental health day in your work?
David Collier: That’s a good question, my wife certainly thinks so. Sadly, I have been doing this for so long I am used to it. This is what I do, I swim in the sewers with these people. I have to get into their heads and understand them. If I was sickened by what I saw, I would never be able to do the research properly. I am even forgiving. Had Zeyad only retweeted her once, I’d have written it off. We all make mistakes. But she was a common source for him, they interacted. He must know the type of politics she pushes. This is the problem - these people don’t even have to hide these associations because nobody cares.
Varda Epstein: What did you find to be the most shocking fact to come out of your investigation?
David Collier: There is the big picture and the little picture. The most shocking single fact I found was a person listed as the regional Media Manager for Amnesty writing a Facebook post in Arabic that instructed terrorist factions not to “claim their martyrs” but rather to let the West think they were innocent civilians – not terrorists. The most shocking part of it all, though, is the big picture. We all know Amnesty is biased, but the report exposes the level of that bias – it shows that Amnesty operates with a subconscious (I don’t believe it is a conspiracy) political world vision. One that hates Israel most of all, but is biased against India, ignores the persecution of Christians and is strategically anti-West. I call it subconscious because it is merely the sum of the parts. Most of the parts carry a similar bias and this translates into Amnesty policy. Amnesty is a danger to any Western nation that allows them to operate freely and more fool the nation that pays attention to their findings.
Varda Epstein: This website, Elder of Ziyon, plays a role in your report. Can you describe the context? What is the importance of bloggers and tips from regular people in your investigative work?
David Collier: Elder of Ziyon plays a role in all my reports. It is probably one of, if not the best, archive of relevant information stretching back to the Second Intifada. If you are writing about almost any issue relevant to the conflict, a search of the Elder site is always advisable. In this report for example, I wouldn’t have known that Saleh Hijazi, the Amnesty Deputy Director MENA had used images of terrorists for his Facebook profile, if not for Elder’s website. It both saves me time and acts as a great source for additional knowledge.
Saleh Hijazi, Amnesty International MENA deputy director used this image of PFLP terrorist and airline hijacker Leila Khaled for his profile photo.
Varda Epstein: What hope do you have that your report will instigate positive change? Do you think there is hope that Amnesty International can be reformed? Where might Amnesty International turn its sights instead of Israel, to make the world a better place?
David Collier: Amnesty won’t change from within. They can’t, this is what they are now. What needs to happen is that we need to expose to others the toxicity within. We need to reach its membership; the political alliances and every forum in which Amnesty has influence. Show those people the report. Only real external pressure will ever work and even then, I do not know if it is possible to salvage without a complete rebuild.
What should they be doing? Every Human Rights NGO on the planet should currently have one single goal: The abolition of the UN Human Rights Council and the construction of a new UN human rights body that has strict, points-based criteria about membership. The UNHRC should be leading the way on global human rights issues and such a body could be such a force for good. Instead it is infested with and controlled by despots. Nothing would improve global human rights more than a properly run UNHRC, so if you see an NGO currently working with them – rather than calling for their abolition, you can automatically say that NGO is not a true human rights NGO. 
Sahar Mandour, Amnesty International researcher, Lebanon
Varda Epstein: Can you tell us about your roots and also about the person you are, today? What makes you a fighter, a person dedicated to digging deeply to fight against antisemitism?
David Collier: I was born in the UK and lived in Israel for 19 years. I was part of the Oslo generation, land for peace, two states, and all that. I worked intensively with Palestinians during the 1990s. I published a monthly newspaper and used the Al Ayam publishing house in Ramallah. I worked for peace. Then came the second Intifada. Israel’s problem isn’t so much the Palestinians, as the global movement that has turned them into a cause. This conflict should have ended in 1949. The reasons it didn’t have nothing to do with Israel, nor – and I can hear people shout at me – with the Palestinians. They weren’t even a thing in 1949. The war against Israel is an international one. The Palestinian identity as we know it today was created from the outside. I recognise this and this is where I fight my battles.
There is no single thing that led me to be a fighter. I lost close friends, but then so have most Israelis. I think I fight because I have to. I do not see it as a choice. People often ask “what would you have done” when referring to the rise of the Nazis, the creation of Israel, and other important milestones in history. Well, we are at war now - it is a global battle and the stakes are higher than most people imagine. If you are not doing anything today, there is your answer.
Varda Epstein: What’s next for David Collier?
David Collier: I was writing a book in 2015 when Corbyn was elected to lead the Labour Party. The last four years have been an enormous time consuming and emotional rollercoaster. Corbyn was merely a symptom of a growing problem and I see him simply as the first wave. Boris has now been elected and we have 5 years of opportunity to continue fighting. I am scared people will think the job is done – it would be a huge mistake to think that. On the immediate horizon I can go back and hopefully finish the book. It addresses the rise of the Palestinian identity as a weapon with which to fight against Israel. I am going back to the British archives in London to help me as much of the evidence is there. So fingers crossed, the next major thing for me would be to have my book published. 

***
Read more Judean Rose interviews:


Israel's Jewish Indigenous Land Rights: A Conversation with Nan Greer, Part 2


We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.

AddToAny

EoZ Book:"Protocols: Exposing Modern Antisemitism"

Printfriendly

EoZTV Podcast

Podcast URL

Subscribe in podnovaSubscribe with FeedlyAdd to netvibes
addtomyyahoo4Subscribe with SubToMe

search eoz

comments

Speaking

translate

E-Book

For $18 donation








Sample Text

EoZ's Most Popular Posts in recent years

Hasbys!

Elder of Ziyon - حـكـيـم صـهـيـون



This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For over 19 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.

Donate!

Donate to fight for Israel!

Monthly subscription:
Payment options


One time donation:

subscribe via email

Follow EoZ on Twitter!

Interesting Blogs

Blog Archive