Monday, September 14, 2026

09/13 Links: The lie of ‘Naza’ and the truth of ‘Fauda’; UK urged to ban Doctors Without Borders over ‘terror links’; Bin Laden wanted to attack UK and Israel years before 9/11

From Ian:

The Gaza casualty figures the West was too frightened to question
It is particularly revealing that Hamas and PIJ have now begun publishing names of their own dead fighters. Those obituaries provide information which was largely unavailable during the war. In several cases, they have effectively contradicted the original classification of the dead by international media and monitoring organisations.

The response should not be to conclude that every dead Palestinian journalist was a terrorist, or that every Palestinian doctor was secretly a militant. That would be very wrong. The proper conclusion is that every casualty database requires scrutiny.

There is another uncomfortable possibility that Western commentators have been reluctant to contemplate: Hamas and PIJ may have understood perfectly well the extraordinary political and emotional power of civilian status in the Western information environment.

A dead journalist generates headlines, as does a dead doctor. A dead paramedic produces photographs of ambulances, uniforms and bloodied medical equipment. A dead Hamas fighter produces none of these things.

If militant organisations deliberately blurred those categories, they were exploiting precisely the protections that democratic societies have painstakingly established for civilians and humanitarian workers, and that would be a particularly cynical form of information warfare.

But there is an equally important warning for Israel. The discovery of genuine Hamas or PIJ members among journalists and medical personnel does not give the Israeli military a licence to regard every journalist, doctor or paramedic as a terrorist. Nor does it eliminate Israel’s obligation to establish, before an attack where feasible, that a legitimate military target actually exists.

Indeed, recent events demonstrate why that distinction matters. An investigation published this week into the 2024 killing of World Central Kitchen workers has raised serious questions about Israeli targeting practices and the use of guilt by association.

Similarly, the Israeli military has recently opened criminal investigations into the deaths of five-year-old Hind Rajab and 15 Palestinian paramedics, after previously denying or disputing aspects of what happened.

So there are two truths which ought to be capable of existing simultaneously. Hamas and PIJ may have exploited civilian professions for military and propaganda purposes, and Israel can still be responsible for unlawful or reckless attacks against genuine civilians.

The refusal to acknowledge the first truth because it complicates the second is propaganda. The refusal to acknowledge the second because it complicates the first is propaganda too. What is most troubling is the intellectual laziness of the Western debate.

For years, journalists and politicians have demanded that Israel substantiate allegations about Hamas operating from civilian infrastructure. That demand is legitimate, but the same standard should now be applied in the opposite direction.

When an individual appears in hospital photographs wearing medical clothing and subsequently appears in militant imagery carrying a weapon, journalists should investigate, and when the evidence does not stand up, that should be reported too.

That is what journalism is supposed to mean.

The greatest danger is not discovering that Hamas sometimes lied about its dead, it is in discovering that Western media organisations were so invested in a particular leftist narrative that they stopped asking whether it was true.

Gaza has produced enough suffering without adding another casualty to the list: the credibility of journalism itself.
New York Times’ Gaza war coverage was clearly biased against Israel, damning study reveals
The New York Times’ coverage of the first months of the war in Gaza displayed a clear bias against Israel by downplaying the country’s casualties while minimizing Hamas’ role in sustaining the conflict, a new study found.

A review of the Times’ 1,559 articles published between Oct. 7, 2023, and June 7, 2024, showed that the Times often omitted deaths sustained by the Jewish military while looking the other way on ongoing Palestinian violence once the war began after Hamas terrorists’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel.

Edieal Pinker of the Yale School of Management, who published his findings in the Studies in Conflict & Terrorism academic journal, said the Times’ coverage was clearly skewed against Israel.

“Drawing on a corpus of 1,559 news articles I document a dominant narrative consistent with a framing that assigns near-exclusive agency and responsibility to Israel while diminishing Hamas’s role in sustaining the conflict,” Pinker wrote.

“It describes Hamas’s October 7 attack followed by Israeli military violence and mounting Palestinian casualties, while largely omitting Israeli casualties post-October 7, Hamas fighter casualties, and post-October 7 Palestinian violence.

“Personal accounts of Palestinian suffering appear two out of every three days, while comparable accounts of Israeli suffering rarely appear,” he said.

A total of 437 Israeli soldiers have been killed since the Jewish state began its offensive in Gaza, with dozens of police officers and civilians also killed and injured in terror attacks throughout the war, according to Israeli officials.

Pinker argued that the Times’ coverage ultimately portrayed Israel as the “sole aggressor” in the conflict while Palestinians were depicted as “passive victims.”
Mahmood urged to ban Doctors Without Borders over ‘terror links’
Shabana Mahmood is being urged to proscribe Doctors Without Borders (MSF) over its staff’s alleged links to terrorist groups.

UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI) has written to the Home Office, Charity Commission and Fundraising Regulator demanding that it investigate alleged ties between Doctors Without Borders and Palestinian terror groups.

The pro-Israel lobbying group is calling on Ms Mahmood, the Home Secretary, to ban the charity in a manner akin to Labour’s proscription of Palestine Action.

Palestine Action was banned by the Government last year after officials claimed that serious criminal damage it had inflicted met the threshold for proscription under the Terrorism Act. The move made membership of, or support for, the group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison.

A report produced by UKLFI, seen by The Telegraph, describes the alleged connections between MSF employees and terrorists, including the late Fadi Jihad Mohammed al-Wadiya, a Palestine Islamic Jihad (PIJ) militant.

Wadiya, a physiotherapist who was employed by MSF between 2018-22 and then again from Oct 7, 2023, was killed in an Israeli air strike in Gaza City on June 25, 2024, in an attack condemned by the charity.

Doctors Without Borders initially denied Wadiya’s involvement with the terrorist group, but on Feb 24 this year the PIJ published a poster naming him as a “martyr commander” and identifying him as “deputy head of its military manufacturing unit”.

Only then did Doctors Without Borders, who still have Wadiya listed as an employee on their website, edit their post about him to say: “On 24 February 2026, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) publicly stated that Fadi Al Wadiya had been a member of the group.

“MSF had no indication that Fadi Al Wadiya might have been involved in military activity of any kind prior to his killing by the Israeli Forces.

“If the Israeli authorities had any reliable information about Fadi’s involvement in military activity, they never shared it with MSF either prior to his killing or when we reached out immediately after he was killed to ask for clarifications around the circumstances of his death.

“We would never knowingly employ people engaging in military activity. Any employee who engages in military activity would pose a danger to our staff and patients.”

The report also raises concerns about Nasser Hamdi Abdelatif Al Shalfouh, an MSF driver who is accused by Israel of being a sniper for the Hamas Jabaliya battalion.

Doctors Without Borders has never addressed allegations of Mr Shalfouh’s involvement with the proscribed organisation.

In 2023, MSF UK raised £11.3m, and ring-fenced around £1m for projects in the Palestinian territories. In 2024, this amount was increased to £2.7m, according to research by UKLFI.

UKLFI claims that despite these sizeable donations, appropriate safeguarding measures are not in place to minimise the risk that money raised by Britons could be used to benefit people associated with proscribed groups.

A UKLFI spokesman said: “British donors giving money to MSF are entitled to expect the highest possible standards of vetting and due diligence, particularly where substantial sums are being transferred into territory controlled by Hamas.




Two screens, one choice: The lie of ‘Naza’ and the truth of ‘Fauda’
I was there. And in a sense, I have been inside both films.

The first is “Naza,” an Israeli movie that won the Special Jury Prize at the Venice Film Festival and received an astonishing 25-minute standing ovation on Saturday.

Do not be deceived by the applause.

The creators are themselves Jews and Israelis. That creates a double deception: The film can be presented to international audiences not merely as an accusation against Israel, but as an accusation seemingly validated from within Israeli society itself.

Yet they employ against the Jews one of the oldest weapons in the arsenal of antisemitism: a blood libel.

I investigated the Israel Defense Forces’ war on the ground, including the deaths of civilians that “Naza” depicts as the consequence of a deliberate policy of cruelty and extermination.

The truth is the opposite.

Then there is the second screen: Netflix, where millions of viewers around the world are watching the TV series “Fauda.” It is a magnificent series, and in its latest season, it confronts an international audience with something many people have never truly understood: the horror of Oct. 7, 2023.

In the aftermath of the Hamas massacre, I visited the burned-out kibbutzim. I walked through the homes of murdered young people and saw blood in kindergartens. I saw the dead piled up. I listened to parents and children and heard testimony about rape and other atrocities.

These are the two screens now before us: the lie and the truth.

The reception given to “Naza” in Venice tells us something disturbing about a cultural milieu apparently eager to believe the worst accusations against the Jewish state. The anonymous voices in the film who claim that Israel made a decision to target civilians make accusations that my own experience contradicts. My witnesses are not anonymous.

At Tze’elim, I entered the high-tech command tents from which soldiers are directed building by building, house by house and tunnel by tunnel.

Asaf, a 51-year-old colonel, and other soldiers explained to me how instructions are issued in real time: Stop. Advance. Change route. Destroy. Avoid.

The purpose is twofold: to protect Israeli soldiers and to protect civilians.

That is the opposite of the picture presented by “Naza.”
Christian Toto: Hollywood’s bias against Jews and Israel is unconscionable — and getting worse
Jewish filmmakers played a starring role in Hollywood’s earliest days.

Today, Jewish artists are more likely to be targeted for boycotts, shamed in public or besmirched for any ties to Israel.

Tinseltown’s current cause célèbre? The Palestinian people.

The just-wrapped Venice Film Festival gave a record-setting 25-minute standing ovation to “NAZA,” a documentary arguing that Israel is purposefully targeting and killing Palestinian civilians.

Yet the nation’s extensive efforts to warn citizens of incoming attacks and millions spent feeding hungry Palestinians suggest otherwise.

“NAZA” won a Special Jury Prize at the celebrated festival. It’s likely to battle the anti-Elon Musk documentary “Musk” for top prize at next year’s Oscar gala.

Meanwhile, a flap involving John Malkovich –– an Oscar hopeful for his work in the upcoming “Wild Horse Nine” –– illustrates Hollywood’s double standard.



Malkovich recently backed out of an Israel-based performance of “The Music Critic.”

The reason? A press release for the live event allegedly made up quotes from the actor praising Israel.

The quotes in question included: “[I look] forward to meeting the warm Israeli audience once again, to whom I feel a strong closeness and solidarity.”

The veteran actor, who knows how tricky an Oscar campaign can be, didn’t just withdraw from the gig.

He released a statement suggesting Israel was complicit in war crimes.

“My appearance in any country, even my own, does not constitute approval of said country’s policies, nor actions, nor its elected or unelected leaders. My appearances would also not condone nor mean that I am in supposed ‘solidarity’ with any particular political cause, nor with the killing of innocents, nor with any acts of terrorism, nor any other kind of barbarity.”

Any alleged pro-Israel pose from Malkovich, seeking his first Oscar at the age of 72, would not help his cause.

Yet stars like Javier Bardem can cry, “Free Palestine” from the Oscar stage and not fear an ounce of blowback or job discrimination.

Meanwhile, while Oscar winners (Jane Fonda, George Clooney, Joaquin Phoenix) defend Mark Ruffalo from his latest anti-Israel screed, a Jewish actor/comedian shared what he endures for being outspoken in Hollywood.

Michael Rapaport (“Atypical,” “Beautiful Girls”) said recently that his mere presence causes danger.


Uri Kurlianchik: The New Mercenaries
There is something people need to understand about Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor, the producers of the anti-Israel propaganda films “No Other Land” and “Naza.”

They are not whistle blowers. They are not concerned citizens. They are not Israeli Snowdens or even Israeli Wallace Shawns.

If they were, they would have gone with whatever “evidence” they have uncovered to the authorities, or the press if they don’t trust the authorities, or some international investigative body if they don’t trust the press. They would have presented concrete facts and actionable evidence that would have led to prosecution, not insinuations that cannot be used in any legal way.

They would not have released a highly-stylized film in a foreign film festival to the thunderous applause of Israel’s foreign enemies. They would not have produced a dramatic story where faceless, nameless people who, for all we know might be actors, read lines seemingly written by al-Mayadeen and Al-Jazeera with no sources or attributions.

Yuval claims that exposing state actions is a moral responsibility for Israelis, but he and his accomplices didn’t expose anything. Is there a single person that can be prosecuted based on his tall tales? These are not witness testimonies, it’s not even hearsay. Any judge in the world would have laughed him out of court with this “evidence.”

No. Except for giving ammunition to Israel’s enemies, he and his accomplice have done nothing.

They are not even Kapos, because Kapos acted under duress against their own people to save their families and lives, not for clout and profit.

People like Yuval and Szor are mercenaries funded by Israel's enemies to damage the country during war. Even the great champions of free speech, the United States, don’t tolerate unregistered foreign agents acting against Americans on American territory.

So why does Israel?

And make no mistake.

Everything about this movies is foreign. The production companies are foreign. The country of origin is foreign. The release is foreign.

These are not Israeli films. These are foreign, anti-Israel films wearing Israeli creators like a fig leaf. Image

They are being paid to give credence to anti-Israel propaganda by giving it the "validation" of an Israeli voice. They are astroturfed Solzhenitsyns. They are international Quislings. They are collaborators in a foreign anti-Israel operation.

Contrary to their claims, there is nothing Jewish about what they are doing.


Culture minister urges revoking citizenship of ‘NAZA’ film creators for ‘treason’
Culture Minister Miki Zohar accused filmmakers Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor of treason on Sunday evening and called for their citizenship to be revoked, after their documentary “NAZA,” which is about Israel’s alleged AI-assisted killing of civilians in Gaza, won a special jury prize at the Venice Film Festival.

“The searing self-hatred of the producers, who are willing to hurt their homeland for applause from the antisemites of the world, is inconceivable and is a betrayal of the country,” Zohar said in a statement.

He also said that “as culture minister, I will immediately act to revoke the Israeli citizenship of these despicable directors for treason against the state.”

Other Israeli ministers also took aim at the directors, who won an Oscar in 2025 for their film “No Other Land” about settler violence in the West Bank.

“You are a disgrace and an embarrassment to the entire people of Israel. Go away!” far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir said on X.

“I am certain that your friends, that is to say our enemies Hamas in Gaza, will welcome you with open arms,” he continued.


The Real Forever War By Abe Greenwald
Via Commentary Newsletter, sign up here.
Perhaps, too, if the West hadn’t already woken up to the horrors of jihad 22 years earlier, it would have done so on October 7, 2023. And if we hadn’t already been two decades into our own misguided post-9/11 self-recrimination, we might have responded with appropriate levels of shock, disgust, and rage at Hamas’s massacre of innocents. Perhaps, instead of opposing Israel’s ensuing war of survival, the civilized world would have cheered it on. There’s no room in that alternate universe for an intifada-friendly mayor of New York City.

But my point isn’t really about Mamdani. It’s rather that if 9/11 plunged the U.S. into a forever war—and I believe it did—it’s not the one that Americans fought in Iraq or in Afghanistan, and it’s not the current war in Iran. Our real forever war is the domestic cultural fight that’s been raging for a quarter century since we were attacked. It’s the war over who we are, the intentions of our enemies, what’s worth defending, what must be defeated, and how to go about it all.

It’s an internal forever war between those who will go to any length to defend the greatest country in history and those who’ve been so blessed by America that they’ve got nothing left to oppose but America herself.

A few years before 9/11, Osama bin Laden said that the U.S. is a “paper tiger” that can’t go the distance in a real war because we don’t have the will to endure casualties. And he claimed that the American soldier is known for his low morale. So bin Laden believed that after being attacked, the U.S. would fold on the battlefield. It’s true that Americans are a humane, feeling people, and we rightly despise seeing harm come to our own. But bin Laden was no prognosticator. The U.S. won the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, overcoming the direst setbacks at a tremendous cost in blood and treasure. In fact, the most senseless aspect of our retreat from Afghanistan in 2021 was that Joe Biden orchestrated the whole debacle only after our armed forces had endured the grueling work of defeating the enemy. We’re now on our way to victory in Iran.

The U.S. will continue to win its wars against theocratic savages. Our real weakness is that a significant portion of the American people have a problem with winning—so much so that we take our hard-earned victories and place them at the feet of the monsters we’ve defeated.

Twenty-five years ago, al-Qaeda killed 3,000 Americans. The U.S. then successfully destroyed al-Qaeda and toppled its Taliban protectors. But what was required to avenge thousands of American deaths and prevent future attacks threw some into a tailspin. In their counterfactual scenario, the U.S. loses. Giving Afghanistan back to the Taliban was but a step toward making that a reality. They’re looking to hand over the American homeland, starting with New York.
Bin Laden wanted to attack UK and Israel years before 9/11, secret dossier reveals
The previously top secret documents detail how the UK was on the hitlist of the al Qaida leader back in 1998.

The information emerged in a trove of President’s Daily Brief (PDB) products released by CIA director John Ratcliffe to mark the 25th anniversary of the September 11 terror attacks, which claimed the lives of nearly 3,000 people, including 67 British citizens.

The spy agency said the single largest publication of such files related to the atrocity “aimed to give Americans a glimpse into our most sensitive intelligence from the years before and day after one of our nation’s darkest moments”.

It added that the 71 briefing notes, which have been redacted, “trace the story of CIA analysts’ evolving understanding” of al Qaida and efforts to highlight and warn of Bin Laden’s plotting “despite sparse, vague, and imperfect information”.

Notably, there are several references in the documents to plans by Bin Laden to hijack planes, including the possibility that a group “may fly an explosive-packed airplane into a US city”.

The PDB is a confidential dossier presented to the US president each day, summarising the most important global threats, national security issues, and intelligence analysis.

One of the documents dated August 28 1998, said that Bin Laden, which the agency spells in the files as Bin Ladin, was looking to target the UK. The 9/11 Living Memorial Plaza in The Arazim Valley outside Jerusalem is the only memorial outside of the United States that lists the names of every victim from the Sept. 11 attacks. (U.S. Embassy)

Entitled “Bin Ladin Terrorist Network Still a Threat”, it was compiled following American cruise missile strikes on al Qaida bases in Sudan and Afghanistan in retaliation for the earlier bombing of US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, which claimed hundreds of lives.

It stated: “Hours before the US missile strikes, Bin Ladin (redacted) was looking at options for further attacks against the US as well as the UK (redacted) Bin Ladin did not indicate precise targets or timing.”

A further memo at the end of that year, subject marked “Significant Near-Term Threat of Bin Ladin Attacks”, said: “We have strong indications that he would like to attack the US and allies such as the UK and Israel on their own soil.

“If Bin Ladin judges these venues are too well defended, however, he will target US and allied interests in other areas of the world accessible to his network.”
Won’t someone please think of the Muslims?
‘What terrifies me is if ISIS were to detonate a nuclear device and kill 50million Americans. Imagine the backlash against peaceful Muslims?’

That tweet – posted with a twinkle in the eye by the late great comedian Norm Macdonald in December 2016 – might just be the most incisive piece of satire our still-young century has so far produced.

It had another good airing on social media over the weekend, as the world marked the 25th anniversary of 9/11 and mainstream-media outlets couldn’t help but Do The Norm Tweet, pivoting away from the apocalyptic Islamist atrocity itself to hand-wring about the ‘backlash’ supposedly suffered by Muslims in its wake:

‘After 9/11, Islamophobia shaped a generation of Muslim New Yorkers’, ran a headline in the New York Times. ‘We were viewed through the lens of terrorism’, a British Muslim interviewee told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme. ‘Sadly there were questions about our faith and whether we share British values.’

You’d be forgiven for thinking 9/11 was a colossal act of ‘Islamophobic hate speech’ – a spicy viral YouTube video, perhaps – rather than the mass slaughter of Americans by Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda for having the temerity to defy their radical Islamic ideology.

The liberal elites have been struggling to shake off this tic for a quarter of a century now. We saw it in Britain last year, when the 20th anniversary of the 7/7 London bombings was met with a preponderance of thinkpieces in which ‘Islamophobia’ was mentioned more than Islamism, if Islamism was mentioned at all.

To the extent liberal outlets feel comfortable talking about the attacks themselves, they can do so only by paying solemn tribute to those slain, as if they were the victims of a natural disaster or a national-security screw-up. The searing, pressing question of why they were murdered is one to be evaded at all costs.
New Rule: Clash of Civilizations | Real Time with Bill Maher (HBO)
It's the 25th anniversary of 9/11 and there's still a clash between radical Islamism and Western liberalism – but nowhere has the moral confusion become more obvious than in Gaza.

The prevailing view of so much of the young left in America is that we’re the worst country ever, so if someone attacks us, they can’t be all bad.




Palestinian flag-waving agitator who stormed 9/11 anniversary event unmasked as self-described 'Marxist'... as OnlyFans account and anti-Trump and Joe Rogan rants surface
The Palestinian flag-waving man who stormed the field at Yankee Stadium during Friday's Subway Series matchup has been identified as Kelly Marcucci, a Long Island man who is now facing several misdemeanor charges.

Wearing a baseball jersey with 'No Kings' emblazoned across the front, Marcucci was seen sprinting onto the field with the flag in the seventh inning only to be tackled by security amid stadium-wide chants of 'USA! USA!'

'No Kings' is a maxim adopted by many of President Donald Trump's critics.

As revealed by the NYPD on Saturday, the 38-year-old Marcucci has been booked for interference with a professional sporting event and trespassing following his arrest during the Yankees' 6-4 win over the crosstown Mets. The protest occurred during a game scheduled to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the World Trade Center terrorist attacks.

Prior to the game, Marcucci posted a rant on his Facebook page blasting everyone from Trump to podcaster Joe Rogan. He went on to discuss the evils of capitalism and Saudi Arabia's alleged role in the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

There is also a deactivated OnlyFans account appearing to belong to Marcucci, who is seen shirtless with a noticeable bulge protruding from his shorts in a profile picture atop the page. Although that image seems mirrored, there is an identifiable tattoo on Marcucci's biceps - the same design peeking out from his left sleeve on Friday night in the Bronx.


Allison Pearson: Spare us the righteousness, Ed Miliband. You’re a disgrace
The wretched truth is this Government cares only for its own survival. On the very day Miliband was announcing punitive action against the one liberal democracy in the Middle East, Andy Burnham had a “constructive conversation” with the president of China. Afterwards, a spokesman for China said the two countries should “respect and trust each other, rise above disagreements, and broaden the agenda of mutually beneficial cooperation”.

The hypocrisy is sickening. The actual Chinese genocide of Uyghur Muslims (hundreds of thousands held in concentration camps) weighs less heavily on the tender consciences of our Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary than the allegations of “ethnic cleansing” of Palestinians in the West Bank. There’s no talk from Burnham or Miliband about slapping sanctions on China, however repellent their actions. Yet righteous grandstanding against Israel on the world stage (at who knows what cost to the British people in economic pain or weakened security) is Labour Party policy, so long as it helps secure victory in the forthcoming Holborn and St Pancras by-election.

Closer to home, we could point to Piddington, where 133 women who live in the Oxfordshire village have just released a powerful video in which they appeal to female MPs, expressing their fears about being swamped by between 1,200 and 3,510 undocumented, illegal male migrants, who would no doubt share the Foreign Secretary’s weird passion for the Palestinian cause. “We are mothers. We are grandmothers. We are widows,” say the women of Piddington. “We are worried we will be outnumbered 10 to one. You’ll destroy this place.”

Will the Government listen? Of course not. They’re far too busy sucking up to Islamists on the 25th anniversary of 9/11 to show any compassion towards English women who rightly fear men from the very cultures that cheered the demonic attack on the Twin Towers. Miliband has picked a side, and it is the side of those who rejoice to see the fall of Western civilisation.

Is it too much to hope for a foreign secretary with some talent for diplomacy? Someone who might put the British interest first? Miliband’s student-activist strategy looks set to provoke an international incident, with Jerusalem and American states already threatening retaliation. The UK’s trade with Florida alone is worth $4bn (£2.96bn) a year. Israeli pharmaceutical companies provide one in seven of the medicines used by the NHS, and we rely on them for defence systems and communications technology, not to mention my favourite hummus.

Last year, I sat next to Yossi Cohen, the charming former head of Mossad, at a dinner. He told me Israel had tipped off MI5 about numerous terrorist plots. How will that embattled country feel towards us now after being treated so ill by their supposed friends? British lives could well be lost because of Miliband’s fatuous virtue signalling, which has no chance of improving the lives of Palestinians who have a lot less interest in a two-state solution than the Islamist-appeasing Labour muppets. As an exasperated Bill Clinton, who had given peace in the Middle East his considerable all during his time as US president, once observed: “Hamas did not care about a homeland for the Palestinians. They wanted to kill Israelis and make Israel uninhabitable.”

Israelis understand that fact in every fibre of their being – survival depends on it. Israel can’t afford to be sloppy, stupid and sentimental as our politicians can, which is why, tragically, so many Jews here are making plans to leave. Our country will be so much poorer without them, but how are they supposed to feel when they see Hamas express pleasure at the policy of the British Government? Hamas, for God’s sake.

“It is absolutely risible for Ed Miliband to describe himself as a proud Jew,” fumes one member of the community. “Nothing he does demonstrates his love for Judaism. It’s clear to everyone he uses that phrase to Jew-wash his policy – it’s despicable.” It really is. I am so sorry that this sweet new year is soured by the betrayal of Britain’s best-integrated, most patriotic and productive minority. Jews have been betrayed to give comfort to some of the worst among us – we should feel ashamed.

As Israel prepares to mark the third anniversary of the October 7 attacks, can I suggest that Miliband spends Rosh Hashanah watching the fifth series of Fauda, which happily began this week on Netflix. One of the greatest ever TV dramas, Fauda charts the never-ending, poisonous cycle of conflict between Israel and Hamas. We follow Doron, a commander in the Mista’arvim undercover unit, and his phenomenal team as they try to protect their small country surrounded by implacable foes. It is no small part of the drama’s great achievement that we perfectly understand the source and depth of the Palestinian hatred, and grow to care for some of them, as much as the Jews’ ferocious will to fight and survive.

Episodes seven and eight, some of the most harrowing ever seen, portray the events of October 7, the worst genocidal attack on the Jews since the Holocaust. On a kibbutz, we see the wife and teenage children of the grizzled, wise Eli, mentor to Doron, smoked out of their safe room and murdered. Dear Eli, whom we have come to know and love over the years, is annihilated by grief.

Doron finds himself at the Nova music festival where he climbs into a skip full of freshly slaughtered beautiful young Israelis – a scene out of Hieronymus Bosch. Words fail me, but days after watching, the horror still resonates within me like a struck gong.

If you told the real-life equivalents of Doron and the Fauda guys what Miliband had just done to Israel, they’d laugh, I think. They’d find it embarrassing, pitifully beside the point. Unbelievably courageous people who had to scoop up the remains of the flower of their youth, engaged in daily battle against barbarism, care nothing for the good opinion of an adenoidal idiot ideologue from Tufnell Park.
Michael Gove: It's an ironclad law of history that countries which are descending into darkness are those where Jews don't feel safe. This week Burnham took Britain a step closer to that abyss
Twenty-five years ago this week, I wrote an article for The Times. About terrorism. It appeared on the morning of 9/11, hours before the attacks on the Twin Towers took place.

In my piece, I argued that people in the West were facing an onslaught from totalitarians who were – mind, heart and soul – opposed to our way of life.

They wanted to eradicate the means by which a free society could continue to exist. A campaign was being conducted which had only one aim – annihilation.

Of course, those behind the violence utilised historic grievances and real injustices to rally support for their cause. But this was a cynical appropriation of suffering to advance fanaticism.

And the terrorists wanted to make the West feel a disabling guilt about resisting their claims. They were succeeding, as politicians, including in Britain, tried to appease them. But, I maintained, if we continued to show weakness in the face of terror, the terrorists would only be emboldened to escalate.

Even though my column appeared on that fateful Tuesday in September, it was not a prediction about what might happen to the US.

It was an analysis of what was happening to Israel. That country, I reported, was in the front line of a fight against a terrorist onslaught which was only growing. I had no idea my fears would become horrific reality in such terrible terms so soon.

I thought about that article again this week. And only partly because of the 9/11 anniversary. What really brought it to mind was the welcome for Ed Miliband’s decision to sanction Israel. From Hamas.

Hamas – the same organisation whose members danced in the streets 25 years ago to celebrate the massacre of the innocents in New York. Hamas, whose killers were responsible, on October 7 2023, for the biggest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. Hamas, whose whole existence is dedicated to the erasure of the existence of any Jewish homeland.

For those who believe in terror, embrace violence and hate the West, Tuesday was another day of celebration. Another day when the West weakened democracy in its fight against fanaticism, accepted the propaganda of those who wish to weaken us, and lowered our resistance to the extremists who hate our way of life.

And while Hamas and its allies celebrated, others mourned. And warned of more mourning to come.


UKLFI: Companies boycotting Israeli communities to be named & shamed - Natasha Hausdorff discusses
Natasha Hausdorff discusses with Peter Cardwell on TalkTV the threat to US businesses operating in the UK and British businesses operating in the US under US Federal and State counter-boycott if they comply with proposed UK legislation banning trade with Israeli communities in Judea & Samaria (the West Bank).

This follows an initiative of US academics and NGOs encouraging whistleblowers to report any such compliance, including any compliance in advance of the legislation being enacted, with a view to invoking applicable US laws.

The discussion also covers rising antisemitism in the UK, which Natasha points out emanates from falsehoods circulated about Israel, including by the Foreign Secretary. She suggests that there is a vicious cycle in which Jew-hate creates the falsehoods and the falsehoods promote further Jew-hate.

Natasha goes on to discuss a report in The Telegraph newspaper that the UK Home Secretary has been urged by UK Lawyers for Israel to proscribe Medecins sans Frontieres (MSF) due to its terror links.

She notes that MSF refused to cooperate with the Israeli government's attempts to ensure that MSF staff were vetted, resulting in the Israeli government refusing to work with MSF. This may have resulted in the Foreign Secretary's false remarks that Israel was preventing medical supplies to Gaza, on which the UK government appears to have relied in decisions imposing sanctions on Israel, and these sanctions in turn feed the baying crowd calling for the extinction of the Jewish State.

Natasha is a barrister, international lawyer, and Legal Director of UKLFI Charitable Trust. She is also the Founder and President of the Center for International Rule of Law (CIROL).


Erin Molan: Britain’s Move Against Israel Could BACKFIRE in a BIG Way
Britain’s new sanctions targeting Israelis have sparked outrage — but Melanie Phillips says the sanctions themselves may not be the most troubling part.

Erin Molan sits down with British journalist and author Melanie Phillips for a wide-ranging conversation about the UK government’s increasingly hostile posture toward Israel, Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband’s rhetoric, and what Phillips believes the consequences could be for Britain’s Jewish community.

Phillips argues that the demonization of Israel does not remain confined to foreign policy. She explains why she believes rhetoric coming from Britain’s political establishment is contributing to an increasingly hostile atmosphere for Jews at home — and why conversations once considered unthinkable are now taking place around Jewish Shabbat tables across the UK.

Erin also presses Melanie on a bigger question: does Ed Miliband genuinely believe the claims he is making about Israel and Israeli communities in Judea and Samaria? Melanie explains why she thinks he does — and why she considers that even more concerning.

The conversation then expands to Britain’s domestic crisis, mass immigration, the growing political influence of Islamist voting blocs, Nigel Farage and Reform UK, Kemi Badenoch, the split on the British right, and Melanie’s warning about what can happen when citizens lose faith in the democratic process.

And finally: what does all of this actually mean for Jews living in Britain?

Melanie Phillips is the author of Fighting the Hate: A Handbook for Jews Under Siege.

⏱️ CHAPTERS
00:00 Ed Miliband Announces Britain’s New Israel Sanctions
01:00 Erin Reacts: But This Isn’t the Worst Part
01:35 Melanie Phillips Joins Erin
02:00 Why Is Britain Targeting Israel?
03:05 “British Jews Are Being Thrown to the Wolves”
04:25 How Attacks on Israel Affect Jews in Britain
05:50 Does Ed Miliband Actually Believe This?
07:10 Why Melanie Says the Left Cannot Abandon Its Narrative
09:25 Miliband’s Claims About Israeli Settlers
10:25 Will These Sanctions Actually Hurt Israel?
11:25 The Bigger Consequence for British Jews
12:30 Why Miliband “Cannot Not Believe It”
14:25 Britain’s Problems at Home — So Why Focus on Israel?
17:30 What Does This Mean for Jews Living in Britain?
18:55 British Jews Are Asking: At What Point Do We Leave?
20:55 Melanie Calls Out Denial Inside the Jewish Community
22:55 Nigel Farage, Reform UK and Britain’s Divided Right
25:10 Melanie’s Warning About “Mob Rule”
26:45 Fighting the Hate & Final Thoughts




ASIO foils 16 terrorist attack plans since Bondi mass shooting
The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) said it has foiled 16 terrorist attacks in the later planning stages since the Bondi mass shooting.

Mike Burges, director of the ASIO, said 33 major terrorism plots, with an attack imminent or in the final stages of planning, had been unravelled since 2014, with 16 of those happening since she Bondi shooting in December 2025.

Australian Associated Press reported that Mr Burgess made the announcement during a speech on Friday, reflecting on the 25 years since 9/11.

“In the nine months since Bondi, ASIO and law enforcement have disrupted 16 of these cases – 16 cases where a terrorist threat was considered serious but not necessarily imminent,” he said.

"The alleged cases include a planned anti-Semitic attack, threats to kill Muslims, and an advocate of racist violence allegedly found in possession of weapons and ammunition."

Mr Burgess detailed how although Sunni violent extremism remained the biggest focus of ASIO’s work, terrorism threats to Australia have changed in recent years, according to the AAP.

Nine reported that Mr Burgess also gave examples of diversified attacks being seen more now, including one inspired by extreme right-wing ideologies, another inspired by extreme left-wing ideologies and one inspired by extremist Christianity, with plans to blow up a school.

He said a major concern is how terrorism threats are now growing in isolation, through social media and the internet, instead of solely a large scale operation.

"Sophisticated mass-casualty attacks have largely been supplanted by individuals or small groups using basic weapons and tactics, making it harder for authorities to detect and intervene,” he said.

"It is too simplistic to assume there is a single terrorism threat or a most likely terrorist threat as we did in the aftermath of 9/11.”


Israeli survivor of Bondi massacre haunted by terrifying moment he came face to face with evil
A young Israeli man who stared down the barrel of a rifle during the Bondi massacre has recalled the terrifying moment the shooter inexplicably spared his life, only to find himself standing over the disarmed gunman moments later, desperately screaming to “f**king shoot him”.

In his first-ever interview for the book “Bondi Terror”, Gefen Bitton reflects on his grueling recovery after being shot during the attack, which left him in a coma and required nearly two dozen surgeries.

Mr Bitton, captured in extraordinary footage with bystander Ahmed al-Ahmed who had tackled the gun from shooter Sajid Akram, says he is haunted by the thought that had he tackled Akram first, he might have shot the gunman and saved lives.

As Ahmed stood over Akram, pointing the rifle at him, Bitton said he yelled at him: “What the f**k are you doing? F**king shoot him or give me the gun. Do something. Shoot him!”

Before Ahmed could answer and before Bitton had a chance to take the gun from him, Bitton was shot.

“I just saw terrorists shooting people, no one was stopping it, I thought something needs to happen, and you just have to help,” he said.

“There was something going on with the gun so I started to run towards him. But in the middle of my running towards him, I saw this other guy, Ahmed Al Ahmed, run from the other direction, so he got to the father before me. And he took the gun.”

Like every Israeli, Bitton did compulsory service in the IDF and can expertly handle weapons.

Ahmed put the rifle down, leaning it against the palm tree, and backed away with his arms in the air, not wanting to hurt anyone.

Sajid retreated towards the bridge, where he would go on to fire another five shots into the Chanukah festival.

“I think all the time that if I was there before (Ahmed) and I had the gun, it would end differently,’ Bitton said.

“I would have done something else. I wouldn’t have just held the gun and put it on the grass. I would have shot [Sajid] and probably tried to shoot the son as well. I would have stopped this terrorist attack. But it didn’t happen, and I was on the floor.”


Trump: If Iran had nukes, it would have ‘blown up’ Israel, Middle East and parts of Europe
U.S. President Donald Trump on Saturday defended his decision to go to war against Iran, saying that if the regime in Tehran acquired nuclear weapons, it would target Israel and the entire Middle East, as well as Europe.

“Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon, it’s very simple,” Trump said.

“They were two weeks away from having a nuclear weapon, if they had it they would have blown up Israel, they would have blown up the Middle East, and they would have hit [some of] Europe’s cities ... and they would have probably hit us too before we put out the fire,” he continued.

Trump said that the war would end “very soon,” probably “right after” the U.S. midterm elections in November.

The comments come amid intermittent U.S. retaliatory strikes on Iranian targets, including Tuesday’s destruction of five Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-linked crude oil tankers. The attacks came after the IRGC targeted a U.S. Navy warship with ballistic missiles twice over the previous two days, CENTCOM said on Wednesday.

The U.S. warship evaded both Iranian attacks and continued to patrol regional waters. No American personnel were injured, according to the statement.

Overnight Tuesday, Jordan’s air defenses intercepted 18 of 20 ballistic missiles fired from Iran toward the kingdom, with the remaining two falling in unpopulated areas and no casualties reported, a Jordanian army spokesperson told Amman’s official Petra News Agency.

The next day, the IRGC said it targeted 10 ships in the Strait of Hormuz, including two U.S. vessels and eight oil tankers, according to Tehran’s state-run IRNA news agency.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian taunted the Trump administration on Saturday, tweeting: “If Americans are warriors, let them face our valiant military forces.

“Why wage war on civilian infrastructure, food supplies, and livelihoods?” he wrote, referring to the U.S. naval blockade of Iran and accompanying economic sanctions. “Our people can’t be bullied into submission. Iran won’t surrender.”

American forces have redirected 100 commercial vessels over the past 60 days since resuming the “steel wall” blockade of Iran, U.S. Central Command said on Saturday.


Kushner calls Israel’s Doha strike ‘terrible,’ says US used fallout to push Gaza deal
Jared Kushner, US President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and special adviser and one of the administration’s key figures in diplomacy surrounding the Gaza Strip, delivered sharp criticism over the weekend of Israel’s strikes in Doha, Qatar, last year, while also acknowledging that Washington used the international fallout from the attack to increase pressure on Israel and push it toward an agreement.

Speaking by video at a conference in Kyiv, Kushner described the Israeli operation bluntly.

“Israel did the strike in Doha, which was a terrible thing,” Kushner said. “And obviously, it was unsuccessful as a military operation. And that led to Israel being globally isolated.”

Kushner went further, saying the Trump administration saw a diplomatic opportunity in the crisis and used the new dynamic to push Israel toward a deal.

“We used that dynamic in order to push them into a deal that now today they’re quite happy with,” he said. “At the time, they were a little uncomfortable with kind of what we were pushing them to do," Kushner said.

In Kushner’s telling, the pressure ultimately paid off.

“Ultimately, it turned out to be great for them,” he said of Israel. “And it turned out to be great for the people of Gaza, because now we have a new government there.”


Kassy Akiva: Georgetown Gives Pro-Iran Apologists The Stage In New Lecture Series
Georgetown University is giving the stage to a slate of scholars and commentators whom critics accuse of advancing views favorable to the Islamic Iranian regime.

The university’s Prince Alwaleed bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding is hosting a four-part Iran lecture series this fall featuring four speakers who will address authoritarianism in Iran, the country’s nuclear program, its grand strategy and U.S.-Iran relations, and the struggle for democracy.

The entire lineup has drawn criticism over the speakers’ ties to the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), an Iranian-American advocacy organization that has repeatedly pushed for diplomacy and accommodation with Tehran and opposed efforts to increase pressure on the Islamic Republic.

The organization was co-founded by Trita Parsi, who is scheduled to deliver Georgetown’s lecture on Iran’s “grand strategy” and U.S.-Iran relations.

Parsi has faced years of controversy over his advocacy on Iran, including a federal lawsuit against a journalist who accused him of advancing Tehran’s interests, correspondence with senior Iranian officials uncovered during discovery, and recent calls for the State Department to consider his deportation.

The series comes as the U.S.-Iran war enters its seventh month and as the Trump administration intensifies scrutiny of foreign nationals accused of ties to the Iranian regime.

Critics say Georgetown has effectively assembled a pro-Iran series from a single policy ecosystem while leaving out Iranian dissidents and other voices opposed to NIAC’s approach.

“Universities are supposed to be beacons of open inquiry and intellectual freedom,” Lawdan Bazargan, founder of Alliance Against Islamic Regime of Iran Apologists (AAIRIA), told The Daily Wire. “When they repeatedly amplify one narrow set of voices while excluding Iranians who challenge those narratives, they risk becoming vehicles for propaganda rather than places of genuine debate.”

“That should concern everyone, especially when these institutions are educating America’s future policymakers,” Bazargan added.

In a letter addressed to Georgetown President Eduardo M. Peñalver, AAIRIA stresses that it is not calling for the speakers to be silenced. Instead, the group argues that Georgetown’s responsibility is to have a “robust debate.”


At Dachau ovens, N. Carolina state house candidate says: ‘This is where Trump supporters belong’
A Democratic state legislative candidate in North Carolina posted a picture of herself in front of Dachau concentration camp ovens with a caption that reads “This is where Trump supporters belong,” Breitbart reported.

Shelly Headen posted photos of what she said was a family vacation at the Nazi site in Germany, where some 41,500 people were murdered during the Holocaust.

Headen is smiling at a memorial at the site, posing in front of ovens from the crematorium where the remains of Jews and others who died at the camp were burned.

She is running for a state House seat, opposed by incumbent Republican Rep. John Blust in a suburban district in the Greensboro/High Point area.

Headen, a certified public accountant and business owner, writes on her Facebook page that she is “running to restore human decency.”

She previously wrote that “I think our only hope is an attack on US soil, ... preferably Alabama, Louisiana ... where the stupid people are.”

She is documented as a suspect in a pair of domestic violence incidents involving her husband, according to law enforcement reports from 2024, which state that “personal weapons” were used.


Pink shares statement after post criticising Macklemore’s free Palestine speech
US pop star Pink has vowed to “keep speaking out” despite being “hurt” by backlash after reposting criticism of Macklemore’s speech calling to “free Palestine”.

Macklemore, 43, opened for Ed Sheeran at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey last week and told the audience he wanted people in Gaza and the West Bank to know they had not been forgotten amid the conflict with Israel.

His words sparked controversy, including a petition demanding he be removed from the remaining dates of the tour, and Pink reposted a message criticising his comments to her Instagram page.

The Grammy-winning singer, 47, did not initially share her own comments on the matter and has since shared a lengthy essay to her page on Friday night as she responded to the backlash her reposts have received.

Pink, born Alecia Beth Moore, explained the post she shared “said things in words I didn’t write” and acknowledged acting “cheap and fast” on social media.

“I’d rather be disagreed with for what I actually said than hated for what anybody else wrote, so let me say it,” she wrote.

“I was born a Jew. I didn’t pick it, and I’ve never hidden it.

“And this week a whole lot of people decided what I believe without asking me, without checking a single thing I’ve ever said or done, because a repost and the word ‘Jew’ were apparently enough to fill in the rest.”

The chart-topper stated she does not speak for Israel or for any Government and reiterated her 2023 stance that “Palestinians deserve a future that honours their humanity and their aspirations”.

Pink explained that what she was “reacting to” with her reposts was a costume previously worn by Macklemore featuring what she described as “a hooked nose, a black beard and a bowl cut”.

“But he apologised, and I let it go, because that’s what we do. We let it go,” she said.

“Then last weekend he stood in front of a stadium full of music-loving families, with violent images from a war on the screens, dedicated a song to the movement of his choice, and then took the mic to tell all of the Jews in the stadium that it wasn’t about them.

“You don’t get to decide that for us. That’s what prompted my repost.


Berlin woman attacked with broken glass bottle for wearing Star of David necklace, police say
The Berlin police opened an investigation on Saturday into a suspected antisemitic attack after a 43-year-old woman was targeted by two men who noticed the Star of David necklace she was wearing, directed antisemitic insults at her, and assaulted her with a broken glass bottle.

According to a police statement, the incident occurred at around 2:30 a.m. between Thursday and Friday on Torstrasse in the Mitte district of central Berlin. Two men, whose identities have not yet been determined, approached the woman after noticing the Star of David she was wearing.

They then hurled antisemitic insults at her, and at one point, one of them attacked her with a broken glass bottle.

Woman suffered cuts before suspects fled scene
The woman attempted to defend herself and suffered several cuts to one of her hands. The two suspects fled the scene following the attack.

Emergency responders treated her at the scene before taking her to a hospital for further care. Police did not provide further details at this stage regarding the woman’s condition or a description of the suspects.

The investigation has been transferred to the Berlin Criminal Police’s State Security Division, which handles offenses with political, extremist or antisemitic backgrounds. German authorities have not yet announced any arrests in the case.

The attack joins a long list of antisemitic incidents recorded in recent years in the German capital. According to Berlin authorities, 2,268 antisemitic offenses were recorded in the city in 2025, up 24.3% from the previous year. Sixty-four of the cases were classified as violent offenses.


JK Rowling’s agent Neil Blair leads fightback against the boycotters with new imprint to promote Jewish and Israeli books
JK Rowling’s agent Neil Blair is spearheading a literary fightback against the wave of post-October 7 censorship with the launch of a new international publishing venture to promote Jewish and Israeli authors.

The JW3 trustee has founded High Line Publishing Studio, which will work across New York and London with two inaugural imprints, Odessa Books and Antidote Books.

High Line’s advisory board includes Lee Child, author of the Jack Reacher series.

Odessa Books, which is named after the Ukrainian city which was a centre of Jewish intellectual life pre-Second World War and is led by executive publisher Jacky Klein, will provide a home for Jewish and Israeli writing.

Antidote Books, which is being run by former HarperCollins UK executive Joel Simon, will focus on “ambitious, idea-driven books that meaningfully shape public conversation”, High Line said.

In 2024, Blair told a JC event in London that censorship of Jewish-themed books or of Israeli authors had “accelerated” since October 7.

He said at the time: “The people doing the censoring are not stupid. They’re not going to get back to me or any other agent and say they declined because the author is Jewish. They’d lose their job. It’s much more subtle than that.”

On the launch of High Line, he said: "I've spent my career working alongside extraordinary writers who are unafraid to challenge assumptions or push the boundaries of our thinking with incredible storytelling.

“The opportunity to build a publisher that combines serious commercial ambition with a genuine commitment to creative freedom was not just exciting, but something I felt was truly needed in the publishing sector.

“That is why High Line exists: to champion distinctive voices, publish exceptional books, and connect them with the broadest possible readership.”

The two imprints are due to publish their first books early next year. Odessa’s authors include Israeli journalists Matti Friedman and Amos Harel, Dara Horn – who has just published a follow-up in the US to her bestseller People Love Dead Jews, entitled The Final Solution to the Jewish Question: A Love Story for the Living – and Adam Louis-Klein, founder of the new Movement Against Antizionism.
How an Israeli workplace productivity company wound up on the front lines of quake relief
In June, twin earthquakes toppled dozens of apartment buildings in Venezuela, killing thousands, burying survivors in rubble and prompting mass evacuations across a swath of the country.

Six weeks later, on August 10, a powerful temblor originating 66 miles beneath the earth’s surface rocked neighboring Colombia, killing more than 300. Plumes of dust rose into the sky as buildings collapsed and residents sought refuge on city streets.

As with most natural disasters, a range of groups was involved in the responses to the earthquakes, from domestic governmental agencies to foreign missions and NGOs.

One delegation to both disasters did not fit the typical mold, though – members of a foundation run by the Israeli tech company Monday.com, a publicly traded software firm that provides work management platforms and AI services to businesses.

The Monday.com Foundation’s Emergency Response Team dispatches personnel to disaster zones, where they leverage the firm’s technology to help first responders deal with the chaos that follows catastrophes like earthquakes.

The team is an example of a for-profit company filling in technological gaps in the nonprofit sector and sidestepping some of the political tensions in disaster relief for countries like Israel, even if private sector interference can sometimes create issues in emergencies.

“When we arrive in the field, we try to understand what’s going on, how the organization is responding to the disaster, and what are their pain points,” said Myriam Kuperman, who heads the Emergency Response Team. “Usually these organizations know best which challenges they have.”

Adapting workplace software for disaster zones

Monday.com’s Emergency Response Team is run through the Monday.com Foundation, the company’s philanthropic arm established in 2021. The foundation registered in Israel in 2024 as a public benefit company, a type of organization that operates similarly to a nonprofit but under a more corporatized structure that allows a commercial enterprise to maintain effective control.





Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon!

Reclaiming the Covenant on America's 250th (May 2026)

"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024)

PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

    

 

 



AddToAny

Printfriendly

EoZTV Podcast

Podcast URL

Subscribe in podnovaSubscribe with FeedlyAdd to netvibes
addtomyyahoo4Subscribe with SubToMe

search eoz

comments

Speaking

Speaking

translate

E-Book

For $18 donation








Sample Text

EoZ's Most Popular Posts in recent years

Search2

Hasbys!

Hasbys!

2019 Nobel Peace Prize nominee

Elder of Ziyon - حـكـيـم صـهـيـون



This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For 20 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.

Donate!

Donate to fight for Israel!

Monthly subscription:
Payment options


One time donation:

Follow EoZ on Twitter!

Interesting Blogs

Show All

Blog Archive

Copyright © Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News | Powered by Blogger
Blogger Templates