From Evan Kohlmann at the 
Counterterrorism Blog:
When I first published a  research paper four years ago with the Danish Institute for  International Studies (DIIS) on the Turkish Muslim charitable group  Insani Yardim Vakfi (IHH), I didn't imagine it would get much of a  response outside the academic conference in which it was presented in  Copenhagen.  However, as a result of this weekend's tragic Israeli raid  on an IHH-sponsored flotilla of vessels attempting to break the ongoing  blockade on Gaza, the group has suddenly jumped into the headlines, and  has become a focus of intense debate over the intentions of the flotilla  organizers and the controversial killing of at least 9 would-be  participants by Israeli commandos. 
Though my DIIS paper made no mention of IHH's activities in Gaza or  in support of suffering Palestinian refugees, some of those angered by  the Israeli flotilla raid have  instead turned their emotional animus on past critics of IHH, such as  myself.  While I certainly can't speak with any authority on what  took place on the Gaza flotilla boats, I'm rather mystified why the  flotilla killings--whether right or wrong--would have any bearing on the  factual question of whether the IHH has engaged in illicit financing  and episodic support to extremist groups.  The evidence in this regard  is fairly weighty, and much of it comes directly from the Turkish  government -- not the United States, nor the Israelis. 
On December 5, 1997, Turkish police raided the IHH headquarters  office in Istanbul and arrested its principal leaders.  Following their  preliminary inquiry, on April 27, 1998, Turkish investigators launched a  formal legal case against the IHH.  According to a report produced by  French counterterrorism magistrates, the inquiry was spurred by the sale  of an AK-47 assault rifle to an IHH leader by "a member of the illegal  organization VASAT."  Turkish police reported seizing a series of  disturbing items from the IHH in Turkey, including an explosive device,  two sticks of dynamite, bomb making instructions, and a "jihad flag."   The French magistrates report noted that: 
"It appears  that the detained members of IHH were going to fight in Afghanistan,  Bosnia, and Chechnya... The essential goal of this Association was to  illegally arm its membership for overthrowing democratic, secular, and  constitutional order present in Turkey and replacing it with an Islamic  state founded on the Shariah.  Under the cover of this organization  known under the name of IHH, [IHH leaders] acted to recruit veteran  soldiers in anticipation of the coming holy war.  In particular, some  men were sent into war zones in Muslim countries in order to acquire  combat experience.  On the spot, the formation of a military unit was  assured.  In addition, towards the purpose of obtaining political  support from these countries, financial aid was transferred [from IHH],  as well as caches of firearms, knives, and pre-fabricated explosives."
An  official review of the phone records from the IHH's office in Istanbul  revealed two calls to the Bosnian Mujahideen Brigade unit headquarters  in Zenica, five phone calls to a member of the Algerian Armed Islamic  Group (GIA) based in London, and at least one call to Anwar Shaaban's  notorious Islamic Cultural Institute in Milan, Italy.  The IHH's connections to international terrorism have even surfaced  in sworn witness testimony in the U.S. federal court system.  During the  trial of attempted Millenium bomber Ahmed Ressam, noted French  counterterrorism magistrate Jean-Louis Bruguiere took the stand and  testified that IHH had played “[a]n important role” in Ressam's bomb  plot targeting LAX. Under repeated questioning, Bruguiere insisted that  “[t]here’s a rather close relation”: "The IHH is an NGO, but it  was kind of a type of cover-up… in order to obtain forged documents and  also to obtain different forms of infiltration for Mujahideen in combat.  And also to go and gather[recruit] these Mujahideens. And finally, one  of the last responsibilities that they had was also to be implicated or  involved in weapons trafficking."
None of this information is considered sensitive or secret, nor is it  particularly difficult to come by.  Turkish government officials have  openly acknowledged as much in major Western media outlets.  In August  1999, the governor of Istanbul was interviewed in the Washington Post  after he personally ordered local IHH bank accounts frozen because of  suspected criminal activity.  He explained at the time, "All legal  institutions may have some illegal connections.  This might be the case  here.  If they don't like it, they can appeal in court." 
To his credit, the former Istanbul governor here underscores another  critical point.  Contemporary terror finance networks are most  effectively curtailed using accepted legal sanctions and transnational  cooperation between regional allies.  Incidents such as the deadly Gaza  flotilla raid ultimately undermine the battle against illicit financing,  and weaken shared international resolve to punish those who manipulate  humanitarian relief as a cover to fund terrorism.  The Israeli  government must be more mindful in the future of the wider political  repercussions its attempts at punitive actions can have, whether  technically justified or not.  Those repercussions impact not only the  state of Israel, but also carry implicit costs for the United States and  its European allies.
(h/t Barry Simon)
